REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

CEBU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

TUBURAN CAMPUS:Tuburan, Cebu

url: http://www.ctu.ph/tuburan

OJT Form 7C
October 2012
Revision: 0
Page 1 of 2

email: tuburan@ctu.ph

OJT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

(for BSFi, BSIT and Engineering)

Student: CHARLES ALOBA DALOGDOG
Major: BSICT-IV
Training Period:
Instructions: This report is to be completed by the immediate supervisor of the OJT and to be returned to the OJT
coordinator. In the space at the left, encircle the rating that describes the OJT most accurately. Total the value for
all responses and
record in the Total Scores
Cooperation
section.
1
2 Uncooperative, antagonistic
Productivity
3
4 Cooperates reluctantly
1 2 Fails to do
an adequate job
5
6 Cooperates willingly when asked
3 4 Does just
enough to get
by
7
8 Cooperates eagerly and cheerfully
5 6 Maintains
constant level of performance
9
10 Always cooperates eagerly and cheerfully
7 8 Very
industrious, does more than
Ability to Get Along with People
required
1
2
Frequently rude and unfriendly
9 10 Superior
work production record
Ability to Follow
1 2 Unable to
3 4
Needs
instructions
5 6 Follows
difficulty
7 8 Follows
difficulty
9 10 Uses
following
Initiative
1 2 Always
3 4 Sometimes
5 6 Does
7
8 Does more
willingly
9 10 Shows
beyond
Quality of Work
1
2 Does almost
3
4 Does less
satisfactory

3
5
7
9

4
Has some difficulty working with others
6
Usually gets along well with people
8
Is courteous and tactful with people
10 Exceptionally well accepted by peers and
supervisors

Attendance
1
2
Often absent without good excuse
3
4
Frequently late
5
6
Usually present and on time
7
8
Very prompt and regular in attendance
9
10 Always prompt and regular, volunteers for
overtime when asked
Appearance
1
2
Untidy or inappropriately groomed
3
4 Sometimes neglected of appearance
5
6
Satisfactory appearance
7
8
Careful about personal appearance
9
10 Exceptionally neat, and appropriately
groomed

6 Does
Overall Performance
acceptable
1
2 Unsatisfactory
work
3
4 Below average
7
8 Does more
5
6
Average
neat,
9 10 Shows
7
8 Very good
neat,
9
10 Outstanding
accurate
Dependability
1
2 Unreliable
3
4 Sometimes .fails in obligations
5
6
Meets obligations under supervision
7
8
Meets obligations under very little
supervision

10

Instructions
follow instructions
repeated detailed
most Instructions without
instructions with no
initiative in interpreting and
instructions
attempts to avoid work
attempts to avoid work
assigned job willingly
than assigned job
resourcefulness in going
assigned job.
no acceptable work
than required amount of
work
normal amount of

than required amount of

accurate work
special attitude for doing
work beyond required amount

Meets obligations without supervision

TOTAL SCORE:________

GRADE EQUIVALENT ___________ (please refer to next page)

KEVIN JOSEPH R. MIRASOL

OJT Supervisor (Printed Name & Signature)

Page 2 of 2
Describe the student-trainees areas of strengths:

Describe the student-trainees areas that need improvement:

OJT Supervisors Printed Name

Position

OJT Supervisors Signature

Date

Cooperating Agency

Address

TABLE ON NUMERICAL RATING WITH EQUIVALENT POINT GRADES

SCORE

GRADE

98-100
95-97
92-94
89-91
85-88
81-84
77-80
73-76
69-72
65-68
61-64
57-60
53-56

95
94
93
92
91
90
89
88
87
86
85
84
83

7-POINT
SCALE
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.2

SCORE

GRADE

49-52
45-48
41-44
37-40
33-36
29-32
25-28
21-24
17-20
12-16
8-11
4-7
0-3

82
81
80
79
78
77
76
75
74
73
72
71
70

7-POINT
SCALE
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5