Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 66

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The

British Standards Institution 2012

BRITISH STANDARD

Spur and helical


gears
Part 3: Method for calculation of
contact and root bending stress
limitations for metallic involute gears

UDC 621.833.1

BS 436-3:1986
(Reprinted,
incorporating
Amendment No. 1)

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Committees responsible for this


British Standard
The preparation of this British Standard was entrusted by the Machinery and
Components Standards Committee (MCE/-) to Technical Committee MCE/5
upon which the following bodies were represented:
Association of Consulting Engineers
British Clock and Watch Manufacturers Association
British Gear Manufacturers Association
British Horological Institute
British Railways Board
Engineering Equipment and Materials Users Association
Federation of Manufacturers of Construction Equipment and Cranes
Gauge and Tool Makers Association
Institution of Mechanical Engineers
Institution of Production Engineers
Lloyds Register of Shipping
Machine Tool Industry Research Association
Milling Cutter Association
Ministry of Defence
National Coal Board
Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders Limited

This British Standard, having


been prepared under the
direction of the Machinery
and Components Standards
Committee was published
under the authority of the
Board of BSI and comes
into effect on
30 September 1986
BSI 06-1999
The following BSI references
relate to the work on this
standard:
Committee reference MCE/5
Draft for comment 84/73219 DC
ISBN 0 580 15227 8

Amendments issued since publication


Amd. No.

Date of issue

Comments

5797

May 1988

Indicated by a sideline in the margin

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Contents
Page
Committees responsible
Inside front cover
Foreword
ii
Section 1. General
1
Scope and field of application
1
2
Definitions and symbols
2
3
Guide to using the calculation procedure
7
Section 2. Contact stress calculations
4
Basic equations for contact stress calculations
8
5
Nominal tangential force for contact stress, FHt
8
6
Zone factor for contact stress, ZH
9
7
Contact ratio factor for contact stress, Z&
9
8
Elasticity factor for contact stress, ZE
10
9
Basic endurance limit for contact stress, BH lim
10
10 Material quality for contact stress, ZM
12
11 Lubricant influence, roughness and speed factors for contact
stress, ZL, ZR and Zv
13
12 Work hardening factor for contact stress, ZW
13
13 Size factor for contact stress, ZX
13
14 Life factor for contact stress, ZN
13
15 Application factor, KA
16
16 Dynamic factor, Kv
18
17 Load distribution factors, KH and KH
22
18 Minimum demanded and actual safety factors on contact stress,
SH min and SH
26
Section 3. Bending stress calculations
19 Basic equations for tooth root bending stress
27
20 Nominal tangential force for bending stress, FFt
28
21 Geometry factors for bending stress, YF, YS, Y
28
22 Basic endurance limit for bending stress BF0
31
23 Material quality factor for bending stress, YM
32
24 Sensitivity factor for bending stress, YB
33
25 Surface condition factor for bending stress, YR
34
26 Size factor for bending stress, YX
34
27 Life factor for bending stress, YN
36
28 Load factors for bending stress, KF and KF
36
29 Minimum demanded and actual safety factors on tooth root
stress, SF min and SF
36
Appendix A Variable duty calculations
39
Appendix B Gearing equations
41
Appendix C Design guidance on tooth modifications
42
Appendix D Typical residual stresses
44
Appendix E Tooth and mesh stiffness c9 and c*
45
Appendix F Definition of material quality
46
Appendix G Examples of calculations
47
Appendix H Equations of graphs
52
Figure 1 Yield strength for contact stress, BHY
10
Figure 2 Values of BHD
11
Figure 3 Values of ZG2
12

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Page
12
14
14
15
16
17
21
21
24
25
29
32
35
35
37

Figure 4 Casedepth factor, Zc


Figure 5 Combined speed and lubricant factors, ZLZv
Figure 6 Roughness factor, ZR
Figure 7 Values of ZW
Figure 8 Life factor for contact stress, ZN
Figure 9 Constituent parts of typical gear load
Figure 10 Kv350 for helical gears, & W1
Figure 11 Kv350 for spur gears
Figure 12 Constant K for calculation of fsh
Figure 13 Values of qy
Figure 14 Dimensions of the basic rack of the gearing
Figure 15 Values of BF0
Figure 16 Values of YR
Figure 17 Values of YX
Figure 18 YN for through hardened steel
Figure 19 YN for thick case surface hardened steel and
cast iron
37
Figure 20 YN for thin case surface hardened steel, grey cast
iron and bronze
38
Figure 21 Typical S/N curve
39
Figure 22 Height and length of end relief
42
Figure 23 Height of crowning
43
Table 1 Value of ZE for some material combinations
10
Table 2 Limiting casedepth
11
Table 3 Values of ZM
13
Table 4 Values of application factor, KA
16
Table 5 Examples of prime mover with different working
characteristics
16
Table 6 Examples of driven machines with different working
characteristics
17
Table 7 Values of X
19
Table 8 Auxiliary value, A
23
Table 9 Minimum and maximum values of KH!
26
Table 10 Value of YM
33
Table 11 Values of 9
33
Table 12 Default values for contact stress S/N curve
parameters
40
Table 13 Typical values of residual stress, BR
44
Table 14 Change in residual stress due to post-hardening
operations
45
Table 15 Variable duty calculation example
52
Table 16 Values of Kv350 at discontinuities
55
Table 17 Kv350 termination points
55
Table 18 Values of Kv350 at discontinuities
55
Table 19 Kv350 termination points
56
Publication referred to
Inside back cover

ii

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Foreword
This Part of BS 436 has been prepared under the direction of the Machinery and
Components Standards Committee. It is a general application standard for spur
and helical external and internal gears.
The standard follows the principles developed by the International Organization
for Standardization (ISO) in that the stress levels in the tooth flank and in the
tooth root are calculated and compared with basic permissible stress levels
derived from tests on simple test specimens.
Modifying factors used to calculate stress levels are based on the ISO proposals
but have been adjusted to avoid the step functions which occur in these proposals.
This Part of BS 436 together with BS 436-1 Basic rack form pitches and accuracy
(diametrical pitch series) and BS 436-2 Basic rack form, modules and accuracy
(1 to 50 metric module) supersede BS 436:1940 which is therefore withdrawn.
BS 436-1 is retained solely for the purpose of supplying replacement gears
designed in accordance with the imperial system of units.
To assist in the data processing of the calculations given in this standard,
FORTRAN sub-routines can be obtained from the British Gear Association1).
Procedures for some factors are extracted or derived from Draft International
Standard ISO/DIS/6336/1, 2 and 3, Calculation of load capacity of spur and
helical gears.
A British Standard does not purport to include all the necessary provisions of a
contract. Users of British Standards are responsible for their correct application.
Compliance with a British Standard does not of itself confer immunity
from legal obligations.

Summary of pages
This document comprises a front cover, an inside front cover, pages i to iv,
pages 1 to 58, an inside back cover and a back cover.
This standard has been updated (see copyright date) and may have had
amendments incorporated. This will be indicated in the amendment table on the
inside front cover.
1) British

Gear Association, c/o Institution of mechanical Engineers, Birdcage Walk, London


SW1 H9JJ.

BSI 06-1999

iii

iv

blank

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Section 1. General
1 Scope and field of application
1.1 This Part of BS 436 is a general application standard for spur and helical external and internal gears
of accuracy grades 3 to 10 operating at any pitch line speed. The calculations given in this standard are not
applicable to the prediction of gear damage caused by scuffing, wear, welding or fracture of the gear rims,
web, or hub.
The standard covers methods for determining the actual and permissible contact stresses and bending
stresses in a pair of involute gears. Stress levels on the tooth flank and in the tooth root are calculated and
compared with basic permissible stress levels derived from simple test specimens. Modification factors are
given to take account of:
a) the effects of dimensional variations arising from manufacture and assembly;
b) vibrations arising from sources internal and external to the gears;
c) the effect of the lubricant film and gear flank roughness;
d) stress concentration effects in the tooth root;
e) the effect of different depths of case or surface hardened gears;
f) the effect of bending stress on the tooth flank stress cycle;
g) the effect of residual stress in the tooth root.
Procedures are included for calculating the peak load capacity and for taking account of variable duty.
1.2 The gear type and qualifications in respect of the gear design are as follows:
a) Types of gears: internal and external spur, helical and double helical gears.
b) Range of speed: no restriction but note that at pitch line speeds less than 1 m/s the load capacity is
often limited by wear.
c) Gear accuracy: grade 3 to 10 of BS 436-2. The calculation of load modifying factors are based on the
largest deviation allowed for the particular manufacturing grade.
d) Range of transverse contact ratio: 1.2 u & u 1.9.
e) Range of helix angle: u 45.
f) Basic racks: no restriction.
g) Pinion and pinion shaft: solid or hollow pinion with dil/dfl u 0.52).
h) Gear blank and rim: solid gear blanks and fabricated or cast wheels with rim thickness under the
root greater than 3.5m n 2).
j) Material:
1) through hardened steel;
2) surface hardened steel;
3) cast iron;
4) bronze.
Three grades of material and material production quality are specified (see Appendix F). The permissible
stresses are reduced by a factor ZM on contact stress and YM on bending stress for lower quality materials
(see clauses 10 and 23).
The effect of residual stress at the tooth root is included in this standard. Surface hardening processes,
e.g. carburizing, nitriding and induction hardening, induce beneficial compressive residual stress at the
surface balanced by tensile residual stress in the region of the case/core junction. Grinding the tooth surface
after hardening can reduce the compressive stress and may leave a tensile stress at the surface. A
compressive stress can be introduced (or re-introduced after grinding) by means of controlled shot peening.
Typical values of residual stresses resulting from good heat treatment practice are included in Appendix D.
Appendix H gives the equations and data from which the graphs in the appropriate figures are derived.

2) If

the gears have dimensions outside these limitations then additional calculations are necessary to check the stress levels at
the root of the teeth.

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Where no in-house data are available for the calculation of the endurance limit for contact stress, suitable
fatigue factors can be determined from the information contained in clause 9.
NOTE

The titles of the publications referred to in this standard are listed on the inside back cover.

2 Definitions and symbols


2.1 Definitions
For the purposes of this Part of BS 436 the definitions given in BS 2519-1 apply together with the following.
2.1.1
effective casedepth, ceff
the depth at which the hardness falls below 500 HV for carburized and nitrided cases or below 450 HV for
induction hardening
2.1.2
endurance limit for contact stress, H lim
the maximum contact stress that may be sustained for an infinite number of cycles without the occurrence
of progressive fatigue damage (pitting)
2.1.3
limiting casedepth, clim
that effective casedepth beyond which a further increase in casedepth does not produce a further increase
in failure load
2.1.4
nominal tangential force for bending stress, FFt
the force tangential to the reference cylinder and perpendicular to its straight generators
2.1.5
nominal tangential force for contact stress, FHt
the force tangential to the reference cylinder and perpendicular to its straight generators
2.1.6
peak torque capacity for bending stress, TF max
that torque which may be transmitted for up to 1 000 tooth cycles during the design life of the gears without
causing failure due to bending stress
2.1.7
peak torque capacity for contact stress, TH max
that torque which may be transmitted for up to 1 000 tooth cycles during the design life of the gears without
causing failure due to contact stress
2.1.8
tooth stiffness constant, c9 and c*
that force which will deform one or several meshing gear teeth having a facewidth of 1 mm by an amount
of 1 4m
2.2 Symbols
For the purposes of this British Standard the following symbols apply.
NOTE

This subclause is based on the symbols of BS 2519-2:1976.

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Symbol

Designation

Units

a
b
ceff

centre distancea
facewidth
effective casedepth

mm
mm
mm

c9

d
d1

maximum tooth stiffness of one tooth pair in


normal section
mean value of total tooth stiffness
(or mesh stiffness) per unit facewidth
reference diameter
reference diameter of pinion

d2

reference diameter of wheel

mm

da

tip diameter

mm

dan

virtual tip diameter

mm

db

base diameter

mm

dbn

virtual base diameter

mm

den
df

virtual diameter to highest point of


single tooth pair contact
root diameter

mm
mm

df2

root diameter of internal gear

mm

dfn2

virtual root diameter of internal gear

mm

di

internal diameter

mm

dm

mean diameter [= (da + df)/2]

mm

dn

virtual reference diameter

mm

dw1

pitch diameter of pinion

mm

dw2

pitch diameter of wheel

mm

f
ff

individual deviation
profile tolerance (maximum of pinion and wheel)

4m
4m

fma

mesh misalignment due to manufacturing tolerance

4m

fp

permissible single pitch deviation

4m

fpe

tolerance on pitch

4m

fsh

mesh misalignment due to shaft deflections

4m

g
g!

grinding allowance
length of path of contact

mm
mm

h
ha0

tooth depth
addendum of the basic rack of the tool

mm
mm

hf2

dedendum of internal gears

mm

hfp

dedendum of the basic rack of the gearing

mm

hpr

height of protuberance

mm

hF

bending moment arm

mm

l
lc

bearing span
length of end relief per flank

mm
mm

m
mn

module
normal module

mm

c*

N/(mm4m)
N/(mm4m)
mm
mm

a, u and z2 are negative for internal gears.

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Symbol

Designation

Units

n
p
pbn

rotational speed
pitch
normal base pitch

r/min
mm
mm

pbt

transverse base pitch

mm

pr

protuberance of tool

mm

q
qs

combined flexibility of a pair of teeth


notch parameter

mm4m/N

qy

reduction factor on misalignment due to running-in

sFn

thickness of virtual tooth at critical section

mm

spr

residual undercut left by the protuberance

mm

u
v
w

gear ratioa
pitch line velocity
specific loading Ft/b

m/s
N/mm

wm

mean load intensity

N/mm

x
y
y!

addendum modification coefficient


running-in allowance (only with subscript or )
running-in allowance for KH!

4m
4m

z
zv

number of teetha
virtual number of teeth

B
Ca

parameter for effect of load


height of tip or root relief

4m

Cb

height of end relief

4m

Cc

height of crowning

4m

D
E

tool diameter
Youngs modulus of elasticity

mm

Fm

mean tangential force

MN/m2
N

Ft

nominal tangential force at reference circle

FFt

nominal tangential force for bending stress

FHt

nominal tangential force for contact stress

Fx

mesh misalignment prior to running-in

4m

Fy

effective mesh misalignment

4m

(HV)
I

Vickers hardness value


polar moment of inertia

Kv

dynamic factor

kgm2

Kv350

dynamic factor for FtKA/b = 350

Kv

dynamic factor for spur gears

Kv

dynamic factor for helical gears


(&W 1)

KA

application factor

KF

transverse load factor for bending stress

KF

face load factor for bending stress

KH

transverse load factor for contact stress

a, u and z2 are negative for internal gears.

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Symbol

Designation

Units

KH

face load factor for contact stress (Hertzian pressure)

Mred
PF

mass per unit facewidth of the gear pair referred


to the line of action
actual power capacity based on bending stress

kg/mm
kW

PFP

permissible power capacity based on bending stress

kW

PH

actual power capacity based on contact stress

kW

PHP

permissible power capacity based on contact stress

kW

R
Ra

roughness
arithmetic average roughness (CLA value)

4m
4m

Rz

mean roughness

4m

S
SF

SH

safety factor
actual safety factor for bending
stress (against breakage)
minimum demanded safety factor for bending stress
(against breakage)
actual safety factor for contact stress

SH min

minimum demanded safety factor for contact stress

T
T1

torque
pinion torque

Nm
Nm

T2

wheel torque

Nm

TF

actual torque based on bending stress

Nm

TF max

peak torque capacity for bending stress

Nm

TFP

permissible torque based on bending stress

Nm

TH

actual torque based on contact stress

Nm

TH max

peak torque capacity for contact stress

Nm

THP

permissible torque based on contact stress

Nm

Y
YF

factor for bending stress


tooth form factor for bending stress

YM

material quality factor for bending stress

YN

life factor for bending stress

YR

surface condition factor for bending stress

YS

stress correction factor for bending stress

YX

size factor for bending stress

helix angle factor for bending stress

sensitivity factor for bending stress

Z
Zc

factor for contact stress


casedepth factor for contact stress

Zv

speed factor for contact stress

ZE

elasticity factor for contact stress

ZG

disc/gear correlation factor for contact stress

ZH

zone factor for Hertzian pressure at pitch point for


contact stress
lubricant factor for contact stress

SF min

ZL

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Symbol

Designation

Units

ZM

material quality factor for contact stress

ZN

life factor for contact stress

ZR

roughness factor for contact stress

ZW

work hardening factor for contact stress

ZX

size factor for contact stress

Z&

contact ratio factor for contact stress

en
!n

pressure angle at highest point of single tooth


pair contact
normal pressure angle at reference cylinder

radians
radians

transverse pressure angle at reference cylinder

radians

tw

transverse pressure angle at pitch cylinder

radians

Fen

angle for application of load at highest point of


single tooth pair contact
helix angle (without subscript: at reference cylinder)
base helix angle

radians
radians
radians

contact ratio
transverse contact ratio

virtual transverse contact ratio

overlap ratio

total contact ratio

v
2

Poissons ratio
root radius of internal gear

mm

a0

tip radius of the basic rack of the tool

mm

tooth root fillet radius

mm

fp

root fillet radius of the basic rack of the gearing

mm

rel

radius of relative curvature

mm

root fillet radius at critical section

mm

ultimate tensile strength

MN/m2

actual tooth root bending stress

MN/m2

F0

MN/m2

FP

basic endurance limit of a polished specimen


under a reversing bending load
permissible tooth root bending stress

FY

yield strength for bending stress

MN/m2

actual contact stress (Hertzian pressure)

MN/m2

H lim

endurance limit for contact stress for gears

MN/m2

HD

endurance limit for contact stress for discs

MN/m2

HP

MN/m2

HY

permissible contact stress (permissible Hertzian


pressure)
yield strength for contact stress

residual stress

MN/m2

MN/m2

MN/m2

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Subscripts
1

pinion

wheel

core

core material properties of surface hardened steels

eff

effective values, real stress

est

estimated value

lim

value of endurance limit

min

minimum

max

maximum

red

reduced

sh

shaft

stat

static load

3 Guide to using the calculation procedure


3.1 Calculation procedure
The calculation procedure is used to calculate gear load carrying capacity either:
a) in terms of stresses; or
b) in terms of power.
In the case of a) the permissible stress is calculated from the material endurance limits modified by the
stress modifying factors. This has to exceed the actual stress which is calculated from the nominal
tangential force, modified by the load modifying factors and the gear geometry.
In the case of b) the power capacity of the gear pair is calculated from the permissible stress, the load
modifying factors and the gear geometry. This has to exceed the power required of the gear pair.
In either case the calculation is performed separately for four cases:
1) pinion contact stress (see section 2);
2) wheel contact stress (see section 2);
3) pinion bending stress (see section 3);
4) wheel bending stress (see section 3).
Illustrative examples are given in Appendix G.
NOTE The values of some factors (Kv, KH, KH, KF, KF) depend on the value of the nominal tangential force, Ft. When calculating
the maximum rating of a pair of gears the value of Ft has to be estimated in order to calculate these factors. It is recommended that
if the final rated value of Ft differs from the estimated value by more than 10 % then the load dependant factors are re-calculated
using the rated value of Ft.

3.2 Lubrication
The procedure is valid for gears having adequate lubrication.
NOTE At slow speed, particular care is required to ensure an adequate supply of lubricant at the mesh. It should also be ensured
that the lubricant will not cause corrosion of the gears or any other parts of the gear unit. Corrosion is not covered by this procedure.

3.3 System dynamics


The values of application factor provided for design purposes do not apply if the driving or driven
machinery causes an excitation at a frequency at or close to one of the systems natural frequencies.
NOTE In such cases it is recommended that the designer of the system supplies a value of the application factor, based on calculation
or measurements on similar systems.

3.4 Safety factors


The use of this procedure requires a realistic appraisal of the influencing factors. When experience has been
gained by running other similar gears in similar environments such experience can be used in choosing
appropriate values of the safety factors.

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Section 2. Contact stress calculations


4 Basic equations for contact stress calculations
4.1 Permissible contact stress HP
The permissible contact stress, HP, is calculated separately for pinion and wheel from the equation:
(1)
4.2 Actual calculated contact stress H
The actual calculated contact stress, H, is calculated separately for pinion and wheel from the equation:
(2)
where the value of FHt is the nominal tangential force at the reference circles appropriate to pinion or wheel
calculations respectively from equation (6) or (7).
4.3 Permissible power capacity and torque based on contact stress PHP and THP
The permissible power capacity, PHP, based on contact stress is calculated separately for pinion and
wheel from the equation:

(3)
The permissible torque, THP, based on contact stress is calculated separately for pinion and wheel
from the equation:
(4)
4.4 Peak torque capacity for contact stress, TH max
The peak torque capacity for contact stress expressed as a multiple of THP is given by the equation:
(5)
where HY is obtained from Figure 1.
NOTE The lines for surface hardened steels in Figure 1 are to be extended downwards as far as the B line corresponding to
the condition of the core.

5 Nominal tangential force for contact stress, FHt


The nominal force for contact stress, FHt, is calculated from either equation (6) or (7):
(6)
(7)
For information:
(8)

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

If either
a) the gear pair is subject to variable duty; or
b) the gear pair is subject to intermittent high loads (for instance at start-up) greater than the nominal
running torque
then the pinion torque, TH1, in equation (6) is calculated in accordance with the variable duty procedure in
Appendix A for TZH1.

6 Zone factor for contact stress, ZH


6.1 Purpose of ZH
The zone factor, ZH, accounts for the influence of tooth flank curvature at the pitch point on Hertzian stress
and converts the tangential force at the reference cylinder to a normal force at the pitch cylinder.
6.2 Calculation of ZH
The zone factor, ZH, is calculated from the equation:
(9)
For gears at standard centres this simplifies to:
(10)

7 Contact ratio factor for contact stress, Z&


7.1 Purpose of Z&
The contact ratio factor accounts for the load sharing influence of the transverse contact ratio and the
overlap ratio on the specific loading.
7.2 Calculation of Z&
7.2.1 For spur gears, the contact ratio factor, Z&, is calculated from the equation:
(11)
7.2.2 For helical gears with & < 1, the contact ratio factor, Z(, is calculated from the equation:
(12)
7.2.3 For helical gears with & W 1, the contact ratio factor, Z, is calculated from the equation:
(13)
For information, equations for and are given in B.8 and B.9, respectively.

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Figure 1 Yield strength for contact stress, HY

8 Elasticity factor for contact stress, ZE


8.1 Purpose of ZE
The elasticity factor accounts for the influence of the specific material properties E (modulus of elasticity)
and v (Poissons ratio) on the Hertzian stress.
8.2 Calculation of ZE
The elasticity factor ZE is calculated from the equation:
(14)

This is tabulated for some gear materials in Table 1. For properties of bronzes see BS 1400.
Table 1 Value of ZE for some
material combinations
Gear materials

Steel/steel
Steel/SG cast iron
SG cast iron/SG cast iron
Grey iron/grey iron

ZE

189
181
174
146

9 Basic endurance limit for contact stress, Hlim


The basic endurance limit for contact stress, H lim, is calculated separately for pinion and wheel from the
equation:
(15)

10

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

where
HD is obtained from Figure 2;
Zc

for through hardened steels = 1.0;

Zc

for surface hardened steels is obtained from Figure 4 and the limiting casedepth from Table 2;

ZG2

is obtained from Figure 3;

ZG1

is the greater of:


(16)
(17)
Table 2 Limiting casedepth

Hardening process

Carburizing and hardening


Nitriding
Induction hardening

Limiting casedepth
clim

0.16 mn
0.16 mn
0.32 mn

NOTE Values of HD in this figure are derived from disc tests performed under the auspices of the Admiralty Vickers Gear
Research Association and the Navy and Vickers Gear Research Association

Figure 2 Values of HD

BSI 06-1999

11

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

NOTE For internal gears the value of relfor an equivalent external gear should be used, i.e. the value of rel obtained from B.11
should be multiplied by (|u| 1)/(|u| + 1).

Figure 3 Values of ZG2

Figure 4 Casedepth factor, Zc

10 Material quality for contact stress, ZM


10.1 Purpose of ZM
Better quality control exercised in the manufacture of a material results in less scatter on the mechanical
properties of the finished material. Hence, for a given confidence level, better quality materials have a
higher permissible stress and, conversely, lower quality materials a lower permissible stress. Material
qualities are defined in Appendix F.
10.2 Values of ZM
The value of ZM is obtained from Table 3.
12

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Table 3 Values of ZM
ZM

Material

Quality A

Quality B

Quality C

Surface hardened steels

1.0

0.9

0.8

Through hardened or
normalized steels

1.0

0.9

0.8

Through hardened or
normalized cast steels or
bronze.
0.9

0.8

0.7

Nodular cast iron

0.9

0.8

0.7

Other cast irons

0.7

0.5

0.5

11 Lubricant influence, roughness and speed factors for contact stress, ZL, ZR
and Zv
11.1 Purpose of ZL, ZR, Zv
The lubricant viscosity, surface roughness and pitch line speed affect the lubricant film thickness which in
turn affects the Hertzian component of the total stress at the pitch cylinder.
11.2 Calculation of ZL, ZR and Zv
The value of the product (ZLZv) is obtained from Figure 5.
The roughness factor ZR is obtained from Figure 6. If the pinion and wheel roughnesses are different, then:
Ra = (Ra1+Ra2)/2

(18)

If the roughness is measured in terms of Rz, then the value of Ra is calculated from the equation:
Ra = Rz/6

(19)

NOTE The values of Ra1 and Ra2 relate to the flank roughness in the finished condition after completing any running-in treatment
or other manufacturing process which may improve the roughness of the flanks. This includes running-in during commissioning,
when it is specified.

12 Work hardening factor for contact stress, ZW


12.1 Purpose of ZW
The work hardening factor accounts for the increase of surface durability due to meshing a through
hardened steel wheel with surface hardened pinion. In all other cases, ZW = 1.0.
12.2 Calculation of ZW
For pinions, ZW = 1.0.
For wheels of hardness less than 400 HV, the value of ZW is obtained from Figure 7.
If the roughness is measured in terms of Rz then calculate Ra from equation (19).
For wheels of hardness greater or equal to 400 HV, ZW = 1.0.

13 Size factor for contact stress, Zx


The size factor is included to take into account possible influences of size on material quality and its
response to heat treatment and other manufacturing processes. The value is taken as Zx = 1.0.

14 Life factor for contact stress, ZN


14.1 Purpose of ZN
The life factor for contact stress takes account of the increase in permissible stress if the number of stress
cycles is less than the endurance life.

BSI 06-1999

13

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Figure 5 Combined speed and lubricant factors, ZLZv

Figure 6 Roughness factor, ZR

14

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

14.2 Calculation of ZN
If the gear pair is subject to variable duty (and the design torque has therefore been calculated using the
variable duty procedure in Appendix A), then ZN = 1.0. Otherwise, the value of ZN is derived from the
SN curve of the material if it is available, failing which it is taken from Figure 8. The number of cycles of
tooth loading, N, are those appropriate to pinion and wheel, respectively, taking into account the gear ratio
and the number of pinions and wheels in mesh.
Material type 1 applies to through hardened steels, surface hardened steels with casedepth greater than
or equal to the limiting casedepth3) and cast irons other than grey cast iron when some pitting is
permissible (see curve 1 in Figure 8).
Material type 2 applies to through hardened steels and cast irons other than grey cast iron when pitting is
not permissible (see curve 2 in Figure 8).
Material type 3 applies to surface hardened steels with casedepth greater than or equal to the limiting
casedepth3) when pitting is not permissible (see curve 3 in Figure 8).
Material type 4 applies to surface hardened steels with casedepth less than the limiting casedepth3),
bronze and grey cast iron (see curve 4 in Figure 8).
Material type 5 applies to bath nitrided steels (see curve 5 in Figure 8).

Figure 7 Values of ZW

3)

See Table 2 for values of limiting casedepth.

BSI 06-1999

15

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Figure 8 Life factor for contact stress, ZN

15 Application factor, KA
15.1 Purpose of KA
The application factor accounts for load fluctuations from the mean load or loads in the load histogram
caused by sources external to the gearing. The fluctuations depend on the characteristics of the prime
mover, the driven machinery and the system vibration response to the working conditions.
A typical total gear load is shown broken down into individual components including the application factor
in Figure 9.
15.2 Determination of KA
The application factor is assessed from measurements on similar existing systems or, if such information
is not available, from the empirical information given in Table 4,Table 5 and Table 6.
Table 4 Values of application factor, KA
Load characteristic
of prime mover

Uniform
Light shock
Moderate shock
Heavy shock

Load on driven machine


Uniform

1.0
1.10
1.25
1.50

Moderate shock

1.25
1.35
1.50
1.75

Medium shock

1.50
1.60
1.75
2.0

Heavy shock

1.75
1.85
2.0
2.25

Table 5 Examples of prime mover with different working characteristics


Character of operation

Prime mover

Uniform

Electric motor

Light shock

Steam turbine, gas turbine

Moderate shock

Multi-cylinder combustion engine

Heavy shock

Single cylinder combustion engine

16

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Table 6 Examples of driven machines with different working characteristics


Character

Uniform

Driven machine

Generator, uniformly loaded belt or platform conveyors, worm conveyors, light


elevators, packaging machines, feed gears for machine tools, ventilators, light
centrifuges, centrifugal pumps, mixer for light fluids or constant density material,
shearing, pressing, punching, turning gears, moving gears

Moderate shock Non-uniformly (e.g. mixed cargo) loaded belt or platform conveyors, main drives of
machine tools, heavy elevators, turning gears of cranes, industrial and mine
ventilators, heavy centrifuges, centrifugal pumps, mixer for high viscosity or variable
density material, multi-cylinder piston pumps, feed pumps, extruders (general),
calenders, rotary furnaces, rolling mills (continuous zinc strip, aluminium strip as well
as wire and bar rolling mills)
Medium shock

Extruders for rubber, mixers with interrupted operation for rubber and plastics, ball
mills (light), wood working (mills, saws, lathes), billet rolling mills, lifting gear, single
cylinder piston pump

Heavy shock

Excavators (bucket wheel gears, multi-bucket gears, sieve gears, power shovels), ball
mills (heavy), rubber dough mills, breaker (stone, ore) metallurgical machines, heavy
feed pumps, rotary drilling apparatus, brick moulding press, braking drums, peeling
machines, cold strip rolling mills, briquette press, pug mills

Figure 9 Constituent parts of typical gear load

BSI 06-1999

17

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

16 Dynamic factor, Kv
16.1 Purpose of Kv
The dynamic factor accounts for load fluctuations arising from contact conditions at the gear mesh. The
main influences are:
a) gear tooth accuracy;
b) the tooth contact frequency divided by the natural frequency of torsional oscillations due to pinion and
wheel inertias acting against the mesh stiffness.
The portion of a typical gear load accounted for by the dynamic factor is illustrated in Figure 9.
The values included in this standard are appropriate.
NOTE At low-load the value of Kv may be higher than given by the standard, but the stress will not exceed the stress at the
maximum rating of the gear on which the values of Kv are based. If a gear pair is operating at or near resonance speed or at multiples
or sub-multiples of resonance speed (particularly the second and third harmonics and sub-harmonics, respectively) then a thorough
dynamic analysis is recommended. This is beyond the scope of this standard.

16.2 Calculation of Kv
The value of Kv is calculated from the equation:
(20)
For helical gears of overlap ratios greater than or equal to unity,
Kv350 = Kv350
where Kv350 is obtained from Figure 10.
For spur gears,
Kv350 = Kv350
where Kv350 is obtained from Figure 11.
For helical gears of overlap ratio less than unity:
(21)
where
Kv350 is obtained from Figure 10;
Kv350 is obtained from Figure 11.
The value of B is calculated from the equation:
(22)
where X is obtained from Table 7.
If the value of FtKA/b is less than 100, then use FtKA/b = 100.
If the procedure is being used to calculate a maximum rating, then estimate the value of FtKA/b from the
equation:
(23)
where HP is the lesser of HP1 and HP2.
It is advisable to check the accuracy of this estimate when the rating has been calculated and, if necessary,
re-calculate Kv using the new value of Ft.

18

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Table 7 Values of X
Grade

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

FtKA/b # 350

0.4736
0.6110
0.7153
0.8017
0.8635
0.9005
0.9334
0.9530

FtKA/b > 350

0.2931
0.4211
0.5402
0.6361
0.7303
0.7954
0.8687
0.8954

16.3 Values of auxiliary parameter Qv


16.3.1 Qv takes account of the shift in the resonance frequency of the gear pair when both or either of the
pinion and wheel are not solid gears. The general equation for Qv is:
(24)
where Mred 0 is the value of Mred for the particular example of a solid pinion mating with a solid wheel and:
(25)
where
M1 is the moment of inertia of the pinion and
(26)
M2 is the moment of inertia of the wheel, and
(27)
16.3.2 Qv and Mred for some common gear arrangements when the pinion and wheel material are of the
same density are given in a) to d) below. If the density of the pinion and wheel materials are different, Qv
is calculated from equations (24) to (27).
a) For a solid pinion meshing with a solid wheel:
Qv = 1.0

(28)

b) For a solid pinion meshing with a wheel with a fabricated rim:


(29)

where
dm2 = (da2 + df2)/2

BSI 06-1999

(30)

19

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

c) Planetary gears
1) for sun pinion with planet gear wheel:
(31)

where
np la is the number of planets meshing with the sun;
Mpla is the moment of inertia of the planet gear and is calculated from equation (27);
Msun is the moment of inertia of the sun pinion and is calculated from equation (26).
2) planet gear with annulus rigidly connected to the gear case.
In this and other cases where the mass of the stationary annulus is sufficiently large to be assumed
infinite:
(32)

3) planet gear with rotating annulus:

(33)

where
do2 is the outside diameter of the annulus.
(d) Idler gears
(34)
where
Ml, Midl and M2 are the reduced masses of the small gear (pinion), idler gear and large gear
(wheel) respectively.

20

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Figure 10 Kv350 for helical gears, & W 1

Figure 11 Kv350 for spur gears

BSI 06-1999

21

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

17 Load distribution factors, KH and KH


17.1 Purpose of the face load factor for contact stress KH
KH is the maximum specific load divided by the mean specific load.
It accounts for the increase in local load due to mal-distribution of load across the face of the gear caused
by deflections, alignment tolerances and helix modifications.
These include:
pinionshaft bending deflections
pinionshaft torsional deflections
misalignment because of manufacturing tolerances
end relief4)
helix correction4)
crowning4)
17.2 Calculation of KH
17.2.1 The calculation of the face load factor involves the following.
a) determination of the mean load intensity wm;
b) determination of the mesh misalignment due to deflections and manufacturing tolerance modified by
the effect of running-in and helix modifications Fy;
c) determination of mesh stiffness, c*
d) calculation of the face load factor, KH
17.2.2 Calculate the value of beff from the equation:
beff = b lc/2

(35)

17.2.3 Calculate the value of wm


If the tangential load on the gears is known and the procedure is being used to calculate a safety factor,
then wm is calculated from the equation:
wm = FtKAKv/beff

(36)

If the calculated value of wm is less than 100 N/mm then use wm = 100 N/mm.
If the procedure is being used to determine the maximum rating of the gear pair, then an estimated value
of Fm is calculated from the equation:
(37)
where HP is the minimum of HP1 and HP2 then:
wm est = Fm est/beff

(38)

wm est is then used in place of wm in the following analysis.


If higher accuracy is required, then the procedure can be used iteratively by calculating a value of KH
using wm est, then re-calculating using wm est/KH. Three such iterations will normally converge to give a
constant value of KH.
17.2.4 Calculate the value of Fy . If:
a) the gears are helix corrected, or
b) the gear layout does not conform to Figure 12, or
c) substantial forces other than pure shaft torque are to be applied (e.g. pulley loads), or
d) wheel shaft deflections are significant,
then Fy is calculated by a thorough analysis of all contritutions to the mesh misalignment (bearing
clearances, case and shaft deflections, manufacturing tolerances, etc.).
4) Recommendations

22

on the design of end relief, helix correction and crowning are given in Appendix C.

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Otherwise Fy is calculated as follows.


1) Calculate the value of fsh.
Values of K, l and s are defined in Figure 12 and A is taken from Table 8. If the value of s is greater
than 0.3l then use
s = 0.3 l

(39)

Then for spur and single helical gears:

(40)

or for double helical gears

(41)

The value of s for double helical gears is the distance to the centre of the helix which is nearer to the
torqued end of the gear.
Table 8 Auxiliary value, A
Gear pairs
without crowning
or end relief

Gears with
suitably chosen
crowning

Gear pairs with


suitably chosen
end relief

mm4m/N

mm4m/N

mm4m/N

0.023

0.012

0.016

2) Calculate fma. The value of fma depends on the manufacturing tolerance of the gears, the case and
bearings and the bearing clearances.
For gears without helix modifications and without any adjustment on assembly, use:
fma = fH

(42)

where fH is the larger of the tooth alignment tolerances of the pinion and wheel given in Table 5 of
BS 436-2:1970.
For gears with crowning or gears where the contact is adjusted on assembly
fma = 0.5 fH

(43)

provided that this assumption is verified by inspection of the contact marking under light load.
For gears with suitable end relief
fma = 0.7 fH

(44)

3) Calculate Fx from the equation:


Fx = |1.33 fsh fma|

(45)

The negative sign is to be used only if the gears are adjusted on assembly and if the contact pattern is
inspected to justify the assumption.
The value of Fx is to be the maximum of
i) the value from equation (45);
ii) 0.005 wm;
iii) half the actual manufacturing tolerance (higher value of pinion and wheel)

BSI 06-1999

23

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

4) The value of qy is obtained from Figure 13. If the pinion and wheel material are different then:
qy = (qy1 + qy2)/2

(46)

5) Calculate the value of Fy from the equation:


Fy = qyFx

(47)
Factor K
Shrink fit

Key fit

a)

0.0
(s = 0)

0.0
(s = 0)

b)

0.0
(s = 0)

0.0
(s = 0)

c)

0.48

0.8

d)

0.48

0.8

e)

1.33

f)

0.36

0.6

g)

0.6

1.0

1.33

Figure 12 Constant K for calculation of fsh


17.2.5 For gears conforming to the basic rack profile specified in BS 436-1 or BS 436-2 and
with 1.2 u (! u 1.9 average values of c* are:
c* = 20 N/(mm4m) for a steel/steel gear pair;
c* = 18.2 N/(mm4m) for a steel/SG cast iron gear pair;
c* = 16.8 N/(mm4m) for an SG cast iron/SG cast iron gear pair;
c* = 14.8 N/(mm4m) for a steel/grey cast iron gear pair;
c* = 11 N/(mm4m) for a grey cast iron/grey cast iron gear pair.
24

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

If greater accuracy is required use the procedure in Appendix E.


17.2.6 Calculate the value of KH from either:

(48)

(49)

Figure 13 Values of qy
17.3 Purpose of the transverse load factor for contact stress KH
The transverse load factor for contact stress accounts for the mal-distribution of load down the tooth flank
due to profile and pitch deviations and tooth modifications.
17.4 Calculation of KH!
For gears with * < 2
(50)
where fpe is the single pitch tolerance given in Table 3 of BS 436-2:1970.
For gears with * W 2
(51)

BSI 06-1999

25

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Table 9 Minimum and maximum values


of KH!
Gear type

Minimum value of
KH!

Maximum value
KH!

Spur gears

1.0

1/Z2

Helical gears

1.15

!/cos2 b

17.5 Running-in allowance y!


For through hardened steels and cast steels:
(52)
when
v u 5:
no limit
5 < v u 10: y! u 12 800/BH lim
v > 10:
y! u 6 400/BH lim
For cast iron and bronze
y! = 0.275fpe

(53)

when
v u 5:
no limit
5 < v u 10: y! u 22
v >10:
y! u 11
For surface hardened steels
y! = 0.075fpe

(54)

subject to y! u 3 at any speed.


If the pinion and wheel are of different materials then
y! = (y!1 + y!2)/2

(55)

18 Minimum demanded and actual safety factors on contact stress, SHmin and SH
18.1 Minimum demanded safety factor SHmin
The choice of the minimum demanded safety factor is to be agreed between the gear manufacturer and the
purchaser.
NOTE The value should reflect the confidence in the actual operating conditions and material properties being truly reflected in this
standard. When the load histogram is not surely known or where high tooth loads are likely to occur due to circumstances outside the
scope of this standard an appropriately high value of the minimum demanded safety factor should be used. The recommended ranges
of SHmin are
a) for normal industrial applications SHmin = 1.0 to 1.2;
b) for high reliability and critical applications (high consequential damage, loss of life etc.) SHmin = 1.3 to 1.6.

18.2 Calculation of the actual safety factor SH


The value of SH is calculated from the equation:
SH = SH min HP/H

26

(56)

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Section 3. Bending stress calculations


19 Basic equations for tooth root bending stress
19.1 Permissible bending stress FP
The permissible bending stress is calculated separately for pinion and wheel from the equation:
(57)
NOTE The residual stress, R, is viewed algebraically, i.e. R is negative if compressive or positive if tensile. Typical values of R
resulting from good heat treatment practice are given in Appendix D. When requested by the user, the designer should make known,
with justification, the residual stresses assumed for calculation purposes.

19.2 Actual calculated bending stress, F


The actual calculated bending stress is calculated separately for pinion and wheel from the equation:
(58)
19.3 Permissible power capacity and torque based on bending stress PFP and TFP
The permissible power capacity based on bending stress is calculated separately for pinion and wheel from
the equation:

(59)
The permissible torque based on bending stress is calculated separately for pinion and wheel from the
equation:
(60)
19.4 Sub-surface bending in surface hardened gears
Because of the possibility of a sub-surface bending failure, especially when the hardened case is thin, a
check is made at the case/core junction. In this calculation the permissible stresses are calculated from
equation (61) in which the values of material properties relate to the core material.
(61)
To allow for the reduced bending stress below the surface the actual bending stress is calculated from
equation (62), in which F is obtained from equation (58).
(62)
where either
(63)
or 1, whichever is the greater.
The power capacity based on core bending stress is calculated from the equation:
(64)

BSI 06-1999

27

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

19.5 Idler duty


For frequently reversing duties or any drive where the direction of loading on the teeth is reversed each
cycle (for example, idler gears or planets in epicyclic gearing) the permissible tooth root stress is calculated
from the equation:
(65)
and FP W F
For surface hardened gears the permissible core root stress is calculated from the equation:
(66)
19.6 Peak torque capacity for bending stress TF max
The peak torque capacity for bending stress expressed as a multiple of TFP is given by the equation:
(67)
For surface hardened gears, a further requirement is a calculation of the peak torque capacity of the core
material. In this calculation, the value of FY in equation (67) is replaced by FY core where
(68)

20 Nominal tangential force for bending stress, FFt


The nominal tangential force for bending stress, FFt, is calculated from either equation (69) or (70):
(69)
(70)
(71)
NOTE If either:
a) the gear pair is subject to variable duty, or
b) the gear pair is subject to intermittent high loads for instance at start-up) greater than the nominal running torque,
then the pinion torque TF1 in equation (69) is calculated in accordance with the variable duty procedure in Appendix A.

21 Geometry factors for bending stress, YF, Ys and Y"


21.1 Purpose of geometry factors
21.1.1 Form factor, YF
The form factor takes into account the influence of the tooth form on the nominal bending stress for
application of load at the highest point of single tooth pair contact.
21.1.2 Stress correction factor, YS
The stress correction factor takes into account the stress increasing effect of the fillet and the proximity of
the bending moment arm on the nominal bending stress for application of load at the highest point of single
tooth pair contact.

28

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

21.1.3 Helix angle factor for bending stress, Y


The helix angle factor for bending stress accounts for the fact that the conditions for tooth root stress in
helical gears are more favourable as a result of the inclined line of contact than for the virtual spur gears
on which the calculations are based.
21.2 Calculation of geometry factors
21.2.1 Geometrical equations
The parameters used for calculating the auxiliary parameters in 21.2.2 and 21.2.3 are calculated from
equations (72) to (79).
(72)
(73)
(74)

ad

dana = dn + da d

(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)

dana = mnzv + (da d)

(79)

fn

is calculated by substituting dan and da by dfn and df, respectively.

21.2.2 Auxiliary parameters , G, H and qs for YF, YS and Y of external gears. Auxiliary parameters used
for calculating YF, YS and Yfor external gears are calculated from equations (80) to (90).

NOTE

For the purposes of calculation it may be assumed that hfp = ha0 and fp = ao

Figure 14 Dimensions of the basic rack of the gearing

BSI 06-1999

29

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

For the calculation of these parameters the dimensions of the basic rack of the gearing, hfp and fp are
introduced, these are defined in Figure 14. The nominal tooth form is taken as a basis, i.e. for this purpose
the influence of backlash and grinding allowance is ignored.
(80)
= ;/6 radians can be used as a starting point for the solution of equation (80).
Where
(81)
(82)
(83)
For tools without protuberance use Spr = 0
(84)
(85)

(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
* Inv is the involute form of which is tan.

30

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

21.2.3 Auxiliary parameters for YF, YS and Y of internal gears (approximated by a rack). Auxiliary
parameters used for calculating YF,YS and Y for internal gears are calculated from equations (91) to (94).
(91)
(92)
@ F2
@ fp1
As a first approximation for calculation purposes --------- = ---------mn
2

(92a)
(93)
(94)

with den2 according to equation (86)


and dfn2 analogous to dan according to equation (78) or (79).
21.2.4 Tooth form factor YF
The value of YF is calculated from the equation:

(95)

with parameters according to 21.2.2 for external gears and 21.2.3 for internal gears.
21.2.5 Stress correction factor YS
The value of YS is calculated from the equation:
(96)
where
(97)
qs is the notch parameter and
(98)
with parameters according to 21.2.2 for external gears and 21.2.3 for internal gears.
21.2.6 Helix angle factor Y
The value of Yis calculated from the equation:
(99)
When & > 1, use & = 1, when > 30, use = 30.

22 Basic endurance limit for bending stress, Fo


The basic endurance limit for bending stress used in this standard is based on the fully reversed bending
endurance limit of a 0.3 in (7.62 mm) diameter polished specimen, at a 99 % confidence level.
BSI 06-1999

31

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

This stress has to be modified for the effects of loading condition, size, surface finish, quality and life before
it can be used as a permissible stress for gear tooth root bending calculations. These factors are included
in equation (57).
The basic endurance limit is taken from the graph in Figure 15.
If the value of (HV) is known, this shall be used in preference to B when using Figure 15. For values of
(HV) not covered by Figure 15, use the equations in H.12.9

Figure 15 Values of F0

23 Material quality factor for bending stress, YM


23.1 Purpose of YM
Better quality control exercised in the manufacture of a material results in less scatter on the mechanical
properties of the finished material. Hence for a given confidence level, better quality materials have a
higher permissible stress and, conversely, lower quality materials a lower permissible stress. Material
qualities are defined in Appendix F.
23.2 Values of YM
The value of YM is taken from Table 10.

32

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Table 10 Values of YM
YM

Material

Quality A

Quality B

Quality C

Surface hardened steels

1.0

0.9

0.6

Through hardened or
normalized steels

1.0

0.9

0.6

Through hardened or
normalized cast steels or
bronze

0.9

0.8

0.5

Nodular cast iron

0.7

0.6

0.5

Other cast irons

0.3

0.2

0.2

24 Sensitivity factor for bending stress, Y


24.1 Purpose of Y
The sensitivity factor accounts for the sensitivity of the gear material to the presence of notches (i.e. the
root fillet).
24.2 Calculation of Y
24.2.1 Y at the endurance limit
The value of Y at the endurance limit is calculated from the equation:
(100)
where is obtained from Table 11 and qs is obtained from equation (98).
Linear interpolation can be used between the values given in Table 11.
24.2.2 Y at static strength (peak torque capacity)
The value of Y is calculated as follows:
a) for grey cast iron:
Y stat = 1.0

(101)
Table 11 Values of 9
Material

Grey cast iron


Nitrided steel
Soft steel
and bronze

9 (in mm)

FY = 300 MN/m2
FY = 400 MN/m2

0.310
0.100
0.083
0.045

Through hardened

0.2a = 500 MN/m2

0.028

steel cast steel

0.2 =

600 MN/m2

0.019

and S.G. cast iron

0.2 =

800 MN/m2

0.006

B0.2 = 1 000 MN/m2


Carburized, induction and flame hardened steels

0.001

0.2

0.003

is the 0.2 % proof stress.

b) for nitrided steels, from the equation:


Y$ stat = 0.27 Ys + 0.72

BSI 06-1999

(102)

33

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

c) for soft steels and bronze, from the equation:


(103)
d) for through hardened steel, from the equation:
(104)
where 0.2 is the 0.2 % proof stress
e) for carburized, induction and flame hardened steels, from the equation:
Y$ stat = 0.77 Ys + 0.22
Equation 106 deleted.

(105)
(106)

25 Surface condition factor for bending stress, YR


25.1 Purpose of YR
The surface condition factor accounts for the reduction of endurance limit due to flaws in the material and
the surface roughness of the tooth root fillets.
25.2 Calculation of YR
The surface condition factor is taken from Figure 16.
Material type 1 applies to through hardened steels, bronze and cast iron other than grey cast iron
(see curve 1 in Figure 16).
Material type 2 applies to surface hardened steels with casedepth greater than or equal to the limiting
casedepth (see Table 2 for values of limiting casedepth) (see curve 2 in Figure 16).
Material type 3 applies to surface hardened steels with casedepth less than the limiting casedepth
(see Table 2 for values of limiting casedepth) and grey cast iron (see curve 3 in Figure 16).

26 Size factor for bending stress, Yx


The size factor is included to take into account possible influences of size on material quality and its
response to heat treatment and other manufacturing processes. Its value is taken from Figure 17.
Material type 1 applies to through hardened steels and cast iron other than grey cast iron (see curve 1 in
Figure 17).
Material type 2 applies to surface hardened steels (see curve 2 in Figure 17).
Material type 3 applies to grey cast iron and bronze (see curve 3 in Figure 17).

34

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

NOTE
Ra is the roughness (CLA value) of the root.

Figure 16 Values of YR

Figure 17 Values of Yx

BSI 06-1999

35

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

27 Life factor for bending stress, YN


27.1 Purpose of YN
The life factor for bending stress accounts for the increase in permissible stress if the number of stress
cycles is less than the endurance life.
27.2 Calculation of YN
If the gear is subject to variable duty (and the design torque has therefore been calculated using the
variable duty procedure in Appendix A), then the value of YN is 1.0. If the S/N curve of the material is
known then this is used as the basis for the life factor. Otherwise, YN is obtained from Figure 18,
Figure 19 or Figure 20, as appropriate.
Figure 18 applies to through hardened steels.
Figure 19 applies to surface hardened steels with casedepth greater than or equal to the limiting casedepth
(see Table 2 for values of limiting casedepth) and cast iron.
Figure 20 applies to surface hardened steels with casedepth less than the limiting casedepth
(see Table 2 for values of limiting casedepth), grey cast iron and bronze.
For bath nitrided steel YN = 1.0 for all values of N, the number of tooth cycles.

28 Load factors for bending stress, KF and KF


28.1 Purpose of Kf and KF
The load factors for bending stress account for uneven distribution of bending moment across the facewidth
caused by uneven loading across the face.
28.2 Calculation of KF! and KF
KF! = KH!

(107)

where KH! is obtained from 17.4.


(108)
where KH is obtained from 17.2 and h/b is the maximum of h1/b1 and h2/b2.

29 Minimum demanded and actual safety factors on tooth root stress, SFmin
and SF
29.1 Minimum demanded safety factor SF min
The choice of the minimum demanded safety factor is to be agreed between the gear manufacturer and the
purchaser.
NOTE The value should reflect the confidence in the actual operating conditions and material properties being truly reflected in this
standard. When the load histogram is not surely known or where high tooth loads are likely to occur due to circumstances outside the
scope of this standard an appropriately high value of the minimum demanded safety factor should be used. The recommended ranges
of SF min are
a) for normal industrial applications SF min = 1.4 to 1.5;
b) for high reliability and critical applications (high consequential damage, loss of life, etc.) SF min = 1.6 to 3.0.

29.2 Calculation of the actual safety factor SF


The value of SF is calculated from the equation:
SF = SFmin FP/F

36

(109)

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Figure 18 YN for through hardened steel

Figure 19 YN for thick case surface hardened steel and cast iron

BSI 06-1999

37

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Figure 20 YN for thin case surface hardened steel, grey cast iron and bronze

38

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Appendix A Variable duty calculations


A.1 Symbols, terms and units
Symbol

Designation

Units

Ni

number of tooth cycles endured at torque Ti

Nmax

number of cycles at upper knee of S/N curve (see Figure 21)a

NZ

number of cycles at lower knee of S/N curve (see Figure 21)a

exponent (see equation (110) or (111)

Ti

applied pinion torques

Nm

TZ

design torque for W N cycles equivalent to the specified dutya

Nm

lim

stress at lower knee of S/N curve (see Figure 21)a

MN/m2

max

stress at upper knee of S/N curve (see Figure 21)a

MN/m2

torque number (i = 1 for largest torque)

Subscripts
i
a

With additional subscript H for contact stress or subscript F for bending stress calculations.

A.2 Preliminary calculations (applicable to both contact and bending stress)


A.2.1 Arrange the applied pinion torques, Ti, in descending order of magnitude.
A.2.2 For each level of torque calculate the number of cycles of tooth engagement experienced by pinion
and wheel respectively. The number of pinions and wheels in engagement and the gear ratio have to be
taken into account.
A.3 Contact stress calculations
The value of QH is calculated from the equation:
(110)
or if the S/N curve of the material is not available, use the value in Table 12.

Figure 21 Typical S/N curve

BSI 06-1999

39

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Table 12 Default values for contact stress S/N curve parameters


Material type (see 14.2)
1

NHZ

109

5 107

5 107

2 106

2 106

N B H max

104

5 104

105

105

105

H max/H lim

2.0

2.0

1.6

1.3

1.1

QH

8.305

4.983

6.611

5.709

15.72

NOTE In order to facilitate the calculations for surface stress when pitting is allowed, the three
sections of the life curve (see Figure 8) have been approximated to one straight line. This will
result in a slightly over-estimated value of THZ for low numbers of cycles.

A.4 Bending stress calculations


The value of QF is calculated from the equation:
(111)
where Nmin is the minimum of the values Ni, or N F max calculated for pinion or wheel, and YN(Nmin) is the
value of YN for Nmin cycles.
If the S/N curve of the material is not available, values of NFZ and NF max can be taken from the
appropriate life curve in clause 27.
A.5 Variable duty calculations
A.5.1 The following calculation has to be performed for each of the following conditions:
a) contact stress values of QH and NZ using
1) pinion tooth cycles;
2) wheel tooth cycles;
b) bending stress values of QF and NZ using
1) pinion tooth cycles;
2) wheel tooth cycles.
A.5.2 Starting with i = 1 (i.e. including the largest torque only) and continuing with further values of Ti in
descending order, calculate TZi for successive values of Ti using the equation:
(112)
Then:
a) If any value of TZi is greater than the next level of torque T(i+1) then that value of TZi is used as TZ
in the calculation of actual stress or power.
b) If TZi is less than T(i+1) (i.e. if condition a) does not apply), but TZ(i + 1)is greater than T(i + 1), then
T(i + 1) is used as TZ in the calculation of actual stress or power.
c) If when all torques have been included the final value of TZi is less than the final Ti, then TZi is used
as TZ in the calculation of actual stress or power. If the final value of TiZ is greater than the final value
of Ti then the final value of Ti is used. This is equivalent to using a) and b) above with an additional
imaginary infinitesimal torque Ti.

40

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Appendix B Gearing equations


B.1 Reference diameter of pinion, d1
The value of d1 is calculated from the equation:

B.2 Length of path of contact g


The value of g is calculated from the following equations.

NOTE

Centre distance a is a negative quantity for internal gears.

B.3 Transverse base pitch, pbt


The value of pbt is calculated from the equation:

B.4 Pitch line velocity, v


The value of v is calculated from the equation:

B.5 Transverse pressure angle at reference cylinder, !t


The value of t is calculated from the equation:

B.6 Transverse pressure angle at pitch cylinder, !tw


The value of tw is calculated from the equation:

B.7 Base helix angle, b


The value of b is calculated from the equation:
b = sin1(cos n sin )
B.8 Transverse contact ratio, &!
The value of &! is calculated from the equation:

B.9 Overlap ratio, &"


The value of &" is calculated from the equation:

BSI 06-1999

41

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

B.10 Total contact ratio, &*


The value of &* is calculated from the equation:
&* = &" + &!
B.11 Radius of relative curvature, rel
The value of rel is calculated from either of the equations:

B.12 Virtual number of teeth, Zv


The value of zv is calculated from the equation:

Appendix C Design guidance on tooth modifications


C.1 General
This design guide is included as an aid to gear designers in choosing suitable amounts of tooth reliefs and
corrections.
C.2 End relief
End relief is used:
a) on a helical gear to allow for tooth deflections such that a tooth entering the meshing zone receives
minimum shock which is important in gearing with a low noise requirement, and/or
b) to prevent high loading at the ends of the teeth due to mesh misalignment.
The height of end relief is related to tooth deflection and misalignment.
The recommended range of length of end relief is:
lc = 0.05 b
(113)
to
lc = 0.1 b
(114)
The recommended range of height of end relief is:
Cb = FY
(115)
to
Cb = FY + 20
(116)
where Fy is calculated in accordance with 17.2.4.

Figure 22 Height and length of end relief

42

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Figure 23 Height of crowning


C.3 Helix correction
Helix correction is determined by calculating the deflected shape of the pinion at a particular load
assuming a uniform distribution of load across the facewidth (but excluding the end-relieved portion of the
facewidth). The complement of this deflected shape (usually approximated to a straight line) is then applied
to the tooth in terms of metal removed.
Since helix correction is fully effective only when the gear is operating at the load for which the correction
was calculated, the choice of design load is important. The following points should be considered when
choosing the load.
a) When running at loads less than the design load, KH will increase and may become greater than its
value without helix correction. The specific loading will however be less than at the design load.
b) When running at loads greater than the design load, KH will increase but will always be less than
the value without helix correction at the particular load.
Unless the correction is designed after a no-load meshing test, manufacturing and location errors cannot
be compensated for by helix correction. It is recommended therefore that helix correction is used only for
gears of sufficient manufacturing and location accuracy that any such errors are negligible, unless
corrections are designed to accommodate errors as measured on a no-load meshing test. Crowning (see C.4)
is recommended in preference to helix correction if significant alignment errors are anticipated.
C.4 Crowning
Crowning is a crude form of helix modification used to compensate for manufacturing errors and
deformations of the gear under load. It is recommended that crowning be used only if the value of KH
without crowning (clause 17) is greater than 2.
The recommended range of crowning height is
Cc = F

(117)

Cc = F + 20

(118)

to
where fsh is calculated in accordance with 17.2.4.
C.5 Tip and root relief
On helical gears, tip and root relief is used to prevent high loading at the tip/root contact where the sliding
velocity is a maximum and scuffing is likely to occur. On spur gears, tip and root relief is used to allow for
tooth deflection, prevent tip loading and to reduce noise levels at tooth-contact frequency.
The lengths and heights of relief depend largely on the capabilities of the gear cutting machine used to
finish the gears. The following recommendations can therefore only be regarded as typical values.
The length and height of tip relief should not exceed the maximum permissible amounts specified in
BS 436-2.

BSI 06-1999

43

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

The recommended ranges of height of relief are:


a) for helical and double helical gears:
Ca = (0.06 Ft/b) + 5
to
Ca = (0.06 Ft/b) + 25
b) for spur gears:
Ca = fp + (0.06 Ft/b) + 5
to
Ca = fp + (0.06 Ft/b) + 25

(119)
(120)
(121)
(122)

The value selected from these ranges should be the minimum of the tolerance band.
This amount of relief may be disposed as tip and/or root relief on pinion and/or wheel in one of the following
ways:
1) the relief calculated in equations (119) to (122) applied as tip relief only on both pinion and wheel;
2) the relief calculated in equations (119) to (122) applied as both tip and root relief on one gear only
(usually the pinion);
3) one-half the relief calculated in equations (119) to (122) applied as both tip and root on both pinion
and wheel;
4) other dispositions between pinion and wheel tip and root with the relief calculated in equations (119)
to (122) disposed between pinion tip and wheel root, and between pinion root and wheel tip.

Appendix D Typical residual stresses


D.1 General
The residual stresses in Table 13 are typical of the values pertaining after the gear material has undergone
the listed hardening processes. If the actual residual stress of the gear or a test piece is measured, then
that value should be used in preference to the values in Table 13 and Table 14 and should be made known,
with justification, to the user.
D.2 Carburizing and hardening
Incorrect heat treatment may result in compressive residual stress levels lower than those indicated. In
particular, decarburization will reduce the residual stress level. The degree of decarburization can be
detected by surface hardness measurement or by filing and re-checking.
D.3 Gear grinding
Grinding of the surface may affect the residual stress at the immediate surface and, for guidance, the
values in Table 14 may be added algebraically to those in Table 13.
Table 13 Typical values of residual stress, R
Hardening process

Quality A or B

Quality C

Rcore

Rcore

MN/m2

MN/m2

MN/m2

MN/m2

Carburized and hardened

400

240

240

Nitride hardened

400

140

140

Induction hardened

140

450

450

D.4 Shot peening


Shot peening can be used to increase the surface residual compressive stress. Correct selection of shot and
of intensity is extremely important and should be controlled by Almen strips. For guidance, a typical value
of the change in residual stress after shot peening with correct technique is given in Table 14.

44

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Table 14 Change in residual stress due to


post-hardening operations
Operation

Algebraic change to R

Very light grinding


carefully controlled

MN/m2
0

Light full-form grinding

+ 300 (tensile)

Heavy abrasive grinding

+ 600 (tensile)

Controlled shot peening

500 (compressive)

Appendix E Tooth and mesh stiffness c9 and c*


E.1 General
The main factors influencing tooth stiffness are:
a) tooth thickness;
b) tooth form;
c) tooth height;
d) helix angle;
e) radii of profile curvature;
f) rim section design;
g) gear manufacturing deviations and alignment errors;
h) Youngs modulus.
E.2 Calculation of c99 and c*
E.2.1 Single stiffness c9
The maximum stiffness of one pair of teeth (single stiffness) in the normal plane can be evaluated using
equations (123) and (124).
(123)

(124)
Where the coefficients C1 ... C9 are:
C1 =

0.04723; C2 =

0.15551; C3 =

0.25791;

C4 = 0.00635; C5 = 0.11654; C6 = 0.00193;


C7 = 0.24188; C8 =

0.00529; C9 =

0.00182.

E.2.2 Mesh stiffness c*


The mean value of the total tooth stiffness constant in the transverse plane can be calculated from
equation (125). This equation is valid for spur gears and for helical gears up to = 45.
c* = c9 (0.75 &! + 0.25)

(125)

with c9 from equation (123).


E.2.3 Materials other than steel
Equations (123) to (125) apply to steel/steel gear pairs.

BSI 06-1999

45

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

For other materials:


(126)
(127)
where is the ratio of E for the material to E for steel, i.e.
(128)
and
(129)

Appendix F Definition of material quality


F.1 General
The following three levels of material quality are recommended.
a) Quality C defines the minimum requirements for materials and their heat treatments for lightly
loaded gears in non-critical applications.
b) Quality B defines the requirements for materials and their heat treatments for the majority of
industrial gears at reasonable cost.
c) Quality A defines the maximum requirements for materials and their heat treatments for special
applications, e.g. high power or high reliability requirements.
F.2 Quality specifications
F.2.1 General
In order to rate a pair of gears to a particular material quality level, a specification needs to be drawn up
to define the level of inspection expected at different stages of the manufacture. Such a specification may
be the subject of agreement between the gear manufacturer and the gear purchaser.
Guidance and comments are given in F.2.2 to F.2.4 under headings which would normally be included at
each grade level. This is not intended to form the basis of a specification, but rather to be an aid to
determining the quality level of a material manufactured to an existing specification. In practice, a full
specification will probably cover additional items.
F.2.2 Quality C
The inspection requirements for quality C are as follows.
a) Mechanical properties (in final condition): HB or HV only (see BS 240-1 and BS 427-1).
b) Casedepth: Etch check on a test piece carburized with the gear. For induction or flame hardened gears,
etch check on the tooth end face of a sample gear.
c) Weld repairs: For cast steels, permitted with an approved procedure. For other materials, not
permitted in toothed areas.
F.2.3 Quality B
For cast iron other than nodular cast iron, the permissible stresses for quality B are the same as for
quality C on the grounds of safety. The inspection requirements are therefore as for quality C. For other
materials the inspection requirements are as follows.
a) Chemical analysis: Supplier certification.
b) Mechanical properties (in final condition): HB, HV or HRC (see BS 240-1, BS 427-1 and BS 891-1). B
and Charpy or Izod (random samples) (see BS 131-1 and BS 131-2).
c) Crack detection: Magnetic particle inspection (100 % inspection on surface hardened, otherwise
random samples) (see BS 6072).
d) Weld repairs: For cast steels, permitted with an approved procedure. For other materials, not
permitted in toothed areas.
e) Ultrasonic inspection: 100 % checks on cast materials (see BS 4080).

46

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

f) Casedepth: Etch check on a test piece carburized with the gear. For induction or flame hardened gears,
etch check on tooth end face and full tooth profile on a sample or every gear (dependent on batch size).
g) Core structure (nodular irons): Sample check from batch for pearlite and ferrite content and graphite
spheroidization.
h) Heat treatment (carburized steel): Furnace fitted with atmosphere control instrumentation.
F.2.4 Quality A
All tests applicable to quality B apply also to quality A, but random sampling (when applicable to
quality B) is replaced by 100 % testing. Additional inspection requirements are as follows:
a) Ultrasonic inspection: 100 % check (see BS 4080, BS 4124-1 and BS 5996).
b) Casedepth: Hardness traverse check on a test piece (same material cast and heat treatment condition)
carburized with the gear. For induction or flame hardened gears, hardness traverse check at nominated
positions across the facewidth on a sacrificial test gear or segment hardened under the same conditions
as the gear.
c) Surface structure (carburized steel): Check on test piece: essentially fine martensite and specified
retained austenite and carbide.
d) Heat treatment: Furnace temperature chart records.

Appendix G Examples of calculations


G.1 Example 1
G.1.1 The following pair of single helical gears are to be rated against the standard to find the maximum
power rating.
Gear details
Pinion

Wheel

Centre distance, a

325 mm

325 mm

Normal module, mn

8 mm

8 mm

Normal pressure angle at reference


cylinder, !n

20

20

Helix angle,

18 379

18 379

Number of teeth, z1, z2

19

58

Facewidth, b

125 mm

125 mm

Reference diameters, d1, d2

160.392 mm 489.619 mm

Tip diameters, da1, da2

180.708 mm 501.292 mm

Tooth depth, h1, h2

19.2 mm

Mounting arrangement

Both central between bearings

Shaft diameters

130 mm

Number of revolutions, n1

1 450 r/min

Manufacturing accuracy

BS 436-2, grade 5

Construction

solid

solid

Helix modification

none

none

Mean roughness, Ra (flank)

0.8 4m

0.8 4m

BSI 06-1999

19.2 mm

47

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Mean roughness, Ra (root)

3.2 4m

3.2 4m

Hob details
Thickness at reference diameter

12.72 mm

Hob addendum, ha0

11.2 mm

Hob tip radius, a0

2.40 mm

Offset of tip radius from centreline, D

0.80 mm

Material and operating conditions (pinion and wheel)


Material type

steel quality B

Hardening process

carburized and hardened

Surface hardness

825 HV

Effective casedepth, ceff

1.3 mm

Ultimate tensile strength, B

2 130 MN/m2

Core tensile strength, B core

1 000 MN/m2

Residual stress (surface), R

400 MN/m2

Residual stress (core), R core

240 MN/m2

Lubricant viscosity at 40 C

303 cSt

Application factor, KA

1.0

Required life

25 000 h

Minimum demanded safety factor for


contact stress, SH min

1.0

Minimum demanded safety factor for


bending stress, SF min

1.4

G.1.2 From the given gear details the following geometry is calculated.
dw1

= 2 a/(u + 1)

= 160.390 mm

dw2

= dw1 u

= 489.610 mm

= tan1 (tann/cos)

= 21 09 360

db1

= d1 cos!t

= 149.729 mm

db2

= d2 cos!t

= 457.068 mm

&

= b sin/(mn;)

= 1.588

g!

from B.2

= 37.015 mm

g!

used in subsequent
= 34.462 mm
calculations, allowing for
undercut on the pinion
(calculated separately from
this procedure)

bt

from B.3

= 24.757 mm

&!

= g/bt

= 1.392

= sin1 (cos nsin)

= 17 279 240

48

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

rel

from B.11

= 22.703 mm

zv1

= z1/cos3

= 22.32

zv2

= z2/cos3

= 68.15

= d1n1/19098

= 12.178 m/s

G.1.3 Contact stress factors are now calculated as follows.


Zone factor, ZH, from equation (9)

= 2.3877

Contact ratio factor, Z&, from equation (12)

= 0.8477

Elasticity factor, ZE, from Table 1

= 189

Endurance limit for contact stress, H lim


BHD from Figure 2

= 2 130 MN/m2

ZG2 from Figure 3

= 0.925

ZG1 from equation (16)

= 0.887

Limiting casedepth from Table 2

= 1.28 mm

Zc from Figure 4

= 1.0

then H lim 1 from equation (15)

= 1 888 MN/m2

and H lim 2 from equation (15)

= 1 969 MN/m2

Material quality factor, ZM, from Table 3

= 0.9

Lubricant influence, roughness and speed factors, ZL, ZR, Zv


ZLZv from Figure 5

= 1.076

ZR from Figure 6

= 0.943

Work hardening factor, Zw, from clause12

= 1.0

Size factor for constant stress, Zx, from clause 13= 1.0
Life factor for contact stress, ZN
Number of tooth cycles
N1 = 25 000 60 1450

= 2.18 109

Number of tooth cycles


N2 = N1/u

= 7.13 108

then ZN1 and ZN2 from curve 3 of Figure 8

= 1.0

Minimum demanded safety factor for contact


stress, SH min (value specified)

= 1.0

Permissible contact stress, HP1


from equation (1)

= 1 724 MN/m2

and HP2 from equation (1)

= 1 798 MN/m2

Application factor, KA (uniformly loaded)

BSI 06-1999

= 1.0

49

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Dynamic factor, Kv
Qv from 16.3

= 1.0

Kv350 from Figure 10

= 1.05

(FtKA/b)est from equation (23)

= 2 337 N/mm

B from equation (22)

= 0.3586

then Kv

= 1.018

Load distribution factors KH!, KH


beff

from equation (35)

= 125 mm

Fm est

from equation (37)

= 306 700 N

wm est

from equation (38)

= 2 454 N/mm

from Figure 12

=0

from Table 8

= 0.023

fsh

from equation (40)

= 34.3 4m

fma

from equation (42)

= 12.9 4m

FX

from equation (45)

= 58.5 4m

qY

from Figure 13 and equation (46)

= 0.83

FY

from equation (47)

= 48.6 4m

c*

from 17.2.5

= 20 N/(mm4m)

KH

from equation (49)

= 1.20

fpe

from Table 3 of BS 436-2:1970

= 12.2 4m

y!

from equation (54)

= 0.9 4m

KH!

from 17.4

= 1.15

Power capacity PHP1 from equation (3)

= 2 659 kW

PHP2 from equation (3)

= 2 892 kW

G.1.4 Bending stress factors are now calculated as follows:


(sFn/mn) from equation (84):

pinion = 2.075
wheel = 2.159

(F/mn) from equation (85):

pinion = 0.475
wheel = 0.548

Fen from equation (89):

pinion = 0.387 rad


wheel = 0.340 rad

(hF/mn) from equation (90):

pinion = 1.188
wheel = 1.384

Then form factor YF from equation (95):

pinion = 1.630
wheel = 1.788

L from equation (97):

pinion = 1.748
wheel = 1.559

50

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

qs from equation (98):

pinion = 2.187
wheel = 1.968

Then stress correction factor Ys from


equation (96):

pinion = 1.945
wheel = 1.805

Helix angle factor Y from equation (99):

= 0.845

Basic endurance limit for bending stress, F0


from Figure 15 (pinion and wheel)
= 560 MN/m2
Surface residual stress, R (value supplied)

= 400 MN/m2

Material quality factor YM from Table 10

= 0.9

Sensitivity factor Y from equation (100):


pinion = 1.032
wheel = 1.030
Surface condition factor, YR from Figure 16

= 0.904

Size factor for bending, Yx from clause 26

= 0.97

Life factors for bending, YN1 and YN2 from


clause 27

= 1.0

Load factors for bending


KF! from equation (107)

= 1.15

KF from equation (108)

= 1.168

Minimum demanded safety factor, SF min


(value specified)
Permissible bending stress, BFP from
equation (57):

= 1.4

pinion = 629 MN/m2


wheel = 628 MN/m2

Permissible power capacity, PFP from


equation (59):

pinion = 2 090 kW
wheel = 2 051 kW

Sub-surface bending calculations:


Permissible core bending stress,
FP core from equation (61):
Actual bending stress, Fcore from
equation (62):

= 319 MN/m2
pinion = 218 MN/m2
wheel = 235 MN/m2

Core power capacity from equation (64):pinion = 3 056 kW


wheel = 2 787 kW

BSI 06-1999

51

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

G.2 Example 2: variable duty calculation using Appendix A


The design torque of the pair of gears in example 1 is to be calculated from Table 15.
From Table 12, QH = 6.611
and NHZ = 5 107
For the calculation of QF,
pinion

wheel

YX

= 0.97

0.97

YR

= 0.904

0.904

= 2 130

2 130

F0

= 560

560

Nmin

= 3 105

9.8 104

NFZ

= 3 106

3 106

YN(N min)

= 1.352

1.565

Then QF

= 9.685

9.852

Then THZ1

= 9 486 Nm [see A.5.1 a)]

THZ2

= 8 017 Nm [see A.5.1 a)]

TFZ1

= 14 336 Nm [see A.5.1 b)]

TFZ2

= 12 838 Nm [see A.5.1 b)]


Table 15 Variable duty calculation example
Required duty

Ti

n1

Pinion calculation
Duration of
applied
torque

Nm

Ni1

Wheel calculation

THZi1

TFZi1

Nm

Ni2

THZi2

TFZi2

Nm

Nm

Nm

17 500

500

10

3.0 105 8 072

13 797

9.8 104 6 815

12 366

15 000

500

20

6.0 105 8 763

14 336

2.0 105 7 408

12 838

12 500

1 450

25

2.1 106 9 259

6.9 105 7 827

10 000

1 450

60

5.2 106 9 486

1.7 106 8 017

8 000

1 450

Continuous

> 5 107

> 5 107

Appendix H Equations of graphs


H.1 Equations for graph of yield strength for contact stress, HY, in Figure 1
For through hardened steels and cast irons:
HY = 0.96362 B + 838.755
For surface hardened steels:
HY = 9.81 [(31.0 log10 (6ceff) 275.5) log10 (rel) + 130.0 log10 (6ceff) + 526]
H.2 Equations for graph of values of HD in Figure 2
If B < 2 130, then HD = B.
If B W 2 130, then HD = 2 130.

52

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

H.3 Equations for graph of values of ZG in Figure 3

if B W 2 130 or the material is surface hardened and rel/mn W 12.0 then ZG = 0.5667.
Use linear interpolation for values of B between the curves.
H.4 Equations for graph of casedepth factor, Zc, in Figure 4
If ceff/clim < 1.0 then Zc = [5.0 + 3(ceff/clim)]/8.
If ceff/clim > 1.0, then Zc = 1.0.
H.5 Equation for graph of combined speed and lubricant factor, ZLZv, in Figure 5

H.6 Equation for graph of roughness factor, ZR, in Figure 6

H.7 Equation for graph values of ZW in Figure 7

BSI 06-1999

53

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

H.8 Equations for graph of life factor for contact stress, ZN, in Figure 8
H.8.1 Curve 1

H.8.2 Curve 2

H.8.3 Curve 3

H.8.4 Curve 4

H.8.5 Curve 5

54

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

H.9 Data for graph of Kv350 for helical gears, &" W 1, in Figure 10
Table 16 gives values of Kv350 at discontinuities
Table 16 Values of Kv350 at discontinuities
Grade

Qvvz1
0

1 400

1 440

2 000

2 540

Values of Kv350

1.0

1.18

1.47

1.47

1.18

1.0

1.23

1.54

1.54

1.23

1.0

1.31

1.65

1.65

1.31

1.0

1.45

1.80

1.80

1.45

1.0

1.65

1.0

1.96

1.0

2.44

10

1.0

3.38

Use linear interpolation between the above points.


The lines for grades 7 to 10 are terminated at the points given in Table 17.
Table 17 Kv350 termination points
Grade

Kv350

1.50

1.50

1.50

10

1.42

H.10 Data for graph of Kv350 for spur gears in Figure 11


Table 18 gives values of Kv350 at discontinuities
Table 18 Values of Kv350! at discontinuities
Grade

Qvvz1
0

1 000

1 040

1 400

1 800

Values of Kv350

1.0

1.21

1.77

1.77

1.21

1.0

1.30

1.89

1.89

1.30

1.0

1.42

2.06

2.06

1.42

1.0

1.61

2.26

2.26

1.65

1.0

1.92

2.60

2.60

1.98

1.0

2.29

1.0

2.78

10

1.0

3.50

Use linear interpolation between the above points.


The lines for grades 7 to 10 are terminated at the points given in Table 19.

BSI 06-1999

55

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Table 19 Kv350 termination points


Grade

Kv350!

2.40

1.96

1.96

10

1.82

H.11 Equation for graph of values of q in Figure 13

H.12 Equations for graph of values Fo in Figure 15

H.13 Equations for graph of values of YR in Figure 16


H.13.1 Curve 1
YR = 1.49 0.471(6Ra + 1)0.1
H.13.2 Curve 2
YR = 4.924 3.9(6Ra + 1)0.01
H.13.3 Curve 3
YR = 4.161 3.155(6Ra + 1)0.005
H.14 Equations for graph of values of YX in Figure 17
H.14.1 All curves
If mn u 5, then

Yx = 1.0

H.14.2 Curve 1
If 5 < mn < 30, then

Yx = 1.03 0.006 mn

If mn W 30, then

Yx = 0.85

H.14.3 Curve 2
If 5 < mn < 30, then

Yx = 1.05 0.01 mn

If mn W 30, then

Yx = 0.75

H.14.4 Curve 3
If 5 < mn < 25, then

Yx = 1.075 0.015 mn

If mn W 25, then

Yx = 0.70

56

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

H.15 Equation for graph of YN for through hardened steel in Figure 18

H.16 Equation for graph of YN for thick case surface hardened steel and cast iron
in Figure 19

H.17 Equation for graph of YN for thin case surface hardened steel, grey cast iron and
bronze in Figure 20

BSI 06-1999

57

58

blank

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

Publications referred to
BS 131, Methods for notched bar tests.
BS 131-1, The Izod impact test on metals.
BS 131-2, The Charpy V-notch impact test on metals.
BS 240, Method for Brinell hardness test.
BS 240-1, Testing of metals.
BS 427, Method for Vickers hardness test.
BS 427-1, Testing of metals.
BS 436, Spur and helical gears.
BS 436-1, Basic rack form, pitches and accuracy (diametral pitch series).
BS 436-2, Basic rack form, modules and accuracy (1 to 50 metric module).
BS 891, Method for Rockwell hardness test.
BS 891-1, Testing of metals.
BS 1400, Specification for copper alloy ingots and copper alloy and high conductivity copper castings.
BS 2519, Glossary for gears.
BS 2519-1, Geometrical definitions.
BS 2519-2, Notation.
BS 4080, Methods for non-destructive testing of steel castings.
BS 4124, Non-destructive testing of steel forgings.
BS 4124-1, Ultrasonic flaw detection.
BS 5996, Methods for ultrasonic testing and specifying quality grades of ferritic steel plate.
BS 6072, Method for magnetic particle flaw detection.
BS 6443, Method for penetrant flaw detection.

BSI 06-1999

Licensed Copy: University of Manchester Library, The University of Manchester Library, 04/02/2013 16:37, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012

BS 436-3:1986

BSI British Standards Institution


BSI is the independent national body responsible for preparing
British Standards. It presents the UK view on standards in Europe and at the
international level. It is incorporated by Royal Charter.
Revisions
British Standards are updated by amendment or revision. Users of
British Standards should make sure that they possess the latest amendments or
editions.
It is the constant aim of BSI to improve the quality of our products and services.
We would be grateful if anyone finding an inaccuracy or ambiguity while using
this British Standard would inform the Secretary of the technical committee
responsible, the identity of which can be found on the inside front cover.
Tel: 020 8996 9000. Fax: 020 8996 7400.
BSI offers members an individual updating service called PLUS which ensures
that subscribers automatically receive the latest editions of standards.
Buying standards
Orders for all BSI, international and foreign standards publications should be
addressed to Customer Services. Tel: 020 8996 9001. Fax: 020 8996 7001.
In response to orders for international standards, it is BSI policy to supply the
BSI implementation of those that have been published as British Standards,
unless otherwise requested.
Information on standards
BSI provides a wide range of information on national, European and
international standards through its Library and its Technical Help to Exporters
Service. Various BSI electronic information services are also available which give
details on all its products and services. Contact the Information Centre.
Tel: 020 8996 7111. Fax: 020 8996 7048.
Subscribing members of BSI are kept up to date with standards developments
and receive substantial discounts on the purchase price of standards. For details
of these and other benefits contact Membership Administration.
Tel: 020 8996 7002. Fax: 020 8996 7001.
Copyright
Copyright subsists in all BSI publications. BSI also holds the copyright, in the
UK, of the publications of the international standardization bodies. Except as
permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 no extract may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any
means electronic, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior written
permission from BSI.
This does not preclude the free use, in the course of implementing the standard,
of necessary details such as symbols, and size, type or grade designations. If these
details are to be used for any other purpose than implementation then the prior
written permission of BSI must be obtained.

BSI
389 Chiswick High Road
London
W4 4AL

If permission is granted, the terms may include royalty payments or a licensing


agreement. Details and advice can be obtained from the Copyright Manager.
Tel: 020 8996 7070.

Вам также может понравиться