Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Flores
34-21
77th
Street,
No.
406
Jackson
Heights,
New
York
11372
louisflores@louisflores.com
1
(646)
400-1168
04
November
2015
Re
:
Predictably,
the
DOJ
has
decided
once
again
to
protect
a
closed,
opaque
government
that
hides
from
the
public
the
laws
of
the
land,
including
the
application
of
the
laws,
this
time
in
respect
of
the
governments
prosecution
of
activists,
in
violation
of
each
of
FOIA,
the
Presidents
FOIA
Memorandum,
and
the
Attorney
Generals
FOIA
Guidelines.
As
a
public
official,
you
are
supposed
to
uphold
and
defend
the
public
interest.
At
the
heart
of
this
FOIA
action
is
an
effort
to
disclose
to
the
public
how
the
DOJ
treats
the
First
Amendment,
other
Constitutional
rights,
civil
liberties,
and
other
civil
rights
of
activists.
From
your
actions,
it
seems
like
you
oppose
an
open,
transparent
government
and
the
necessary
citizenship
activities,
including
activism,
that
underpin
our
democratic
form
of
government.
You
are
choosing
to
enable
the
DOJs
pattern
and
practise
of
violating
FOIA.
Have
you
already
lost
sight
of
your
role
as
a
public
official
?
Look
at
how
much
they
make
you
give.
Its
going
to
be
through
the
work
of
activists,
including
Lt.
Daniel
Choi,
that
will
end
discrimination
in
society
and
make
government
responsive
to
its
citizens,
thereby
improving
the
function
of
democracy
in
our
government.
Furthermore,
across
the
East
River
from
the
Brooklyn
federal
courthouse,
U.S.
Attorney
Preet
Bharara
is
bringing
spectacular
cases
of
political
and
campaign
corruption
to
trial,
precisely
because
the
triangulation
between
special
interests
groups,
campaign
donors,
and
self-dealing
politicians
have
corrupted
the
workings
of
government.
On
many
occasions,
U.S.
Attorney
Bharara
has
said
that
his
offices
one-off
prosecutions
are
not
enough
to
end
the
corrupting
role
of
money
in
politics.
How
do
you
think
reforms
are
going
to
be
made
to
a
political
system
that
clings
to
corruption
and
opposes
an
open,
transparent
government
?
Its
going
to
take
activism
on
the
part
of
voters
to
shape
public
opinion
and
pressure
for
the
passage
of
legislation
to
fight
corruption.
This
is
how
a
democratic
government
is
supposed
to
function,
and
this
is
especially
true
during
a
period
of
reformation.
The
position
you
are
taking
on
behalf
of
the
DOJ
in
this
action
is
that
the
DOJ
wants
to
protect
and
defend
a
closed,
opaque
form
of
government
that
has
been
widely
reported
to
have
been
rendered
broken
by
the
corrupting
role
of
money
in
politics,
even
as
U.S.
Attorney
Bharara
is
putting
this
corruption
on
trial,
and
even
as
U.S.
Attorney
Bharara
has
been
calling
for
greater
public
involvement
to
fight
corruption.
It
took
the
activism
of
citizens,
including
Lt.
Choi,
to
end
the
governments
de
jure
discrimination
against
gays,
lesbians,
and
bi-sexuals
in
the
U.S.
military.
Its
going
to
take
citizen
activities,
from
both
voters
and
activists,
to
press
for
the
legal
reforms
to
end
corruption
in
government.
Yet,
by
your
actions,
you
are
enabling
the
DOJs
pattern
and
practise
of
keeping
secret
how
the
government
prosecutes
activists
for
their
activism,
thereby
undercutting
the
very
same
citizen
activities
needed
at
precisely
this
time
now
in
order
to
reform
government.
I
hope
that
you
can
remember
why
you
went
into
public
service
and,
thus,
fulfill
on
your
intention
to
serve
the
public
interest
by
working
with
me
to
resolve
the
numerous,
open
issues
in
this
FOIA
action.
Attached,
please
find
a
draft
joint
status
report
to
the
Hon.
Magistrate
Judge
Roanne
Mann.
Please
let
me
know
if
we
can
set
up
a
time
on
Thursday
to
discuss
this,
so
we
can
reach
timely
consensus
on
this
draft
joint
status
report.
Yours sincerely,
Louis
Flores
Louis
Flores
34-21
77th
Street,
No.
406
Jackson
Heights,
New
York
11372
louisflores@louisflores.com
1
(646)
400-1168
__
November
2015
BY
ECF
Re
:
In
response
to
Your
Honors
omnibus
order,
dated
16
September
2015
(Dkt.
No.
14),
the
parties
file
this
joint
status
report.
Due
to
on-going
negotiations,
the
parties
request
an
extension
of
time
of
8
weeks
to
resolve
numerous
issues
about
the
records
being
unjustly
withheld
by
the
U.S.
Department
of
Justice,
including
a
new
FOIA
Request
submitted
by
Plaintiff
to
the
Civil
Rights
Division
of
the
DOJ
for
applicable
records,
a
move
necessitated
by
the
DOJs
erroneous
assertion
that
the
DOJ
can
disclose
records
under
FOIA
at
its
own
discretion.
It
would
be
unjust
to
disallow
Plaintiff
the
right
to
conduct
due
diligence
on
the
few
records
produced,
consequently
leaving
open
so
many
issues,
particularly
if
the
open
issues
place
Plaintiff
in
a
position
to
be
unable
to
oppose
the
DOJs
anticipated
summary
judgment
motion.
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
56(d).
As
Your
Honor
knows,
its
the
DOJs
pattern
and
practise
to
avoid
compliance
with
FOIA.
The
parties
request
this
additional
time
to
help
the
DOJ
reach
compliance
.
Moreover,
it
would
be
unfair
to
bring
the
numerous
details
of
these
unresolved
issues
for
Your
Honor
to
address
during
motion
practise.
The
parties
consent
to
try
to
resolve
as
many
of
these
open
issues
as
possible,
before
providing
an
updated
status
report
by
8
January
2016,
at
which
time
the
parties
will
propose
a
briefing
schedule.
Respectfully
submitted,
(draft)
cc :