Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
APPLICATIONS IN
FORENSIC SCIENCE
ALICAI MORALES, BECKY SMITH, KIMBERLEY MASIH, SUET FAR WONG,
TOBY VICKAR, AND YE JEE ROH
HISTORY OF CSF1P0
CSF1PO is seen as having moderate to low
discrimination power
Located on chromosome 5
(5q33.3-4)
Size range of allelic ladder varies
BACKGROUND OF CSF1PO
Simple repeat STR: Contains units of identical
length and sequence
STUTTER
Stutter peak: minor allele peak with repeat units shorter or longer than parental
allele peak
Due to slipping of Taq polymerase during PCR
Stutter ratio: height/area of stutter peak over that of allelic peak
For lower stutter level:
STUTTER OF CSF1PO
AmpflSTR Profiler DNA Typing System
319 single source DNA samples
Mean stutter rate of CSF1PO was 5.83%
Lower than vWA and FGA, but higher THO1 and TPOX
STUTTER OF CSF1PO
Stutter percentages from internal validation of different
kits under threshold of 0.15
Shorter length of repeat unit and simple sequence of
CSF1PO contribute to higher stutter ratio compared to
other STR markers
Also influenced by extrinsic factors such as primer designs
used and reaction conditions
Smaller stutter ratio would be more advantageous in
interpretation of sample profile
GlobalFilerTM PCR Amplification Kit User Guide (2015).
PATERNITY TESTING
Has low mutation rate (0.16%): this is good
for paternity testing
Research has been done to improve the
reliability of the use of CSF1PO in paternity
testing
http://www.cstl.nist.gov/strbase/fbicore.htm
POPULATION DATA
HETEROZYGOSITY RATES
Country
Yugoslavia
South Korea
Mexico
East Malaysia
Brazil
Colombia/Antioquia
Serbia and Montenegro
China (Fujian province)
Russia (Vulga-Ural)
Egypt
Italy
Heterozygosity
0.748
0.716
0.7062
0.714
0.72304
0.687
0.68
0.7208
0.743
0.67
0.67
SUMMARY
Overall, we would NOT add CSF1PO
to our existing kit
Due to a combination of low heterozygosity rates, low
variation among alleles, and comparatively high stutter ratio,
CSF1PO is among the least discriminating STRs we have
today
CSF1PO
REFERENCES
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/biometric-analysis/codis/codis-and-ndis-fact-sheet
Hammond, H. A., Jin, L., Zhong, Y., Caskey, C. T., & Chakraborty, R. (1994). Evaluation of 13 short tandem repeat loci for use in personal identification applications. American Journal Of Human Genetics, 55(1), 175-189.
Tsai, C. W. , Yang, C. H., Chou, S. L., Cheng, S. G., Pai, C. Y. (2013) Non-CODIS DNA markers could be more effective than CODIS-based STRs in problematic biological relationship cases.Romanian Society of Legal
Medicine, (21), 245-248.
Butler, J. (2005). Forensic DNA Typing: Biology, technology, and genetics of STR markers, Second Edition. Elsevier Academic Press. Pg. (104-108).
D.Y. Wang et al. (2015). Developmental validation of the GlobalFiler Express PCR Amplification Kit: A 6-dye multiplex assay for the direct amplification of reference samples. Forensic Science International: Genetics ,
(19), 148155.
L.K. Boon et al. (2006). Internal validation of the AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR amplification kit on the ABI PrismR3100 genetic analyzer for use in forensic casework at the Department of Chemistry, Malaysia. International
Congress Series, (1288), 379381.
L. Blackmore, M.H. Luebke, J.M. Laird & P.J. Newall. (2000). Preferential Amplification and Stutter Observed in Population Database Samples using the AmpflSTR Profiler Multiplex System. Canadian Society of Forensic
Science Journal, 33:1, 23-32.
GlobalFilerTM PCR Amplification Kit User Guide (2015). Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
K.J.D. Balloch, J. Marshall, J. Clugston, J.W. Gow, Reporting paternity testing results when 2 exclusions are encountered, Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, Volume 1, Issue 1, August 2008,
Pages 492-493
Kee, B. P., Lian, L. H., Lee, P. C., Lai, T. X. & Chua, K. H. Genetic data for 15 STR loci in a kadazan-dusun population from east malaysia. Genet. Mol. Res. 10, 739743 (2011).
Rangel-Villalobos, H. et al. Allele frequency distributions of six Amp-FLPS (D1S80, APO-B, VWA, TH01, CSF1PO and HPRTB) in a Mexican population. Forensic Sci. Int. 105, 125129 (2015).
Cho, N. S., Hwang, J. H., Lee, Y. A. & Park, I. H. Population genetics of nine STR loci: TH01, TPOX, CSF1PO, vWA, FESFPS, F13A01, D13S317, D7S820 and D16S539 in a Korean population. Forensic Sci. Int. 137, 9799
(2015).
Klintschar, M. et al. Genetic variation at the STR loci D12S391 and CSF1PO in four populations from Austria, Italy, Egypt and Yemen. Forensic Sci. Int. 97, 3745 (1998).
Zhivotovsky, L. A., Akhmetova, V. L., Fedorova, S. A., Zhirkova, V. V & Khusnutdinova, E. K. An STR database on the Volga-Ural population. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 3, e133e136 (2009).
Yuan, L. et al. Population genetics analysis of 38 STR loci in the She population from Fujian Province of China. Leg. Med. 16, 314318 (2014).
Keckarevi, D. et al. Population data on 14 STR loci from population of Serbia and Montenegro (new and renewed data). Forensic Sci. Int. 151, 315316 (2015).
Gaviria, A. et al. Nineteen autosomal microsatellite data from Antioquia (Colombia). Forensic Sci. Int. 143, 6971 (2004).
Stojkovi, O., uljkovi, B., Vukosavi, S. & Romac, S. Yugoslav population data on nine STR loci. Forensic Sci. Int. 115, 239240 (2015).
Aguiar, V. R. da C. et al. Updated Brazilian STR allele frequency data using over 100,000 individuals: An analysis of CSF1PO, D3S1358, D5S818, D7S820, D8S1179, D13S317, D16S539, D18S51, D21S11, FGA, Penta D, Penta
E, TH01, TPOX and vWA loci. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 6, 504509 (2015).