RTC-Branch 40, Silay City

CALENDAR OF CASES
Thursday, November 12, 2015
HON. DYNA DOLL CHIONGSON-TROCIO-------------------------------------Presiding Judge
JEANETTE A. ARINDAY----------------------------------------- Interpreter
MERLE P. GOMEZ-------------------------------------------------Stenographer
_________________________________________________________________________________________
CRIM. CASE NOS.:
1)9663

----------

PEOPLE VS. ALEX LEDESMA

FOR: Viol. of Sec.11 Art II RA 9165
Pros. Julius C. Padios for the government
ARRAIGNMENT

2) 9628

----------

PEOPLE VS. MARK TONGCUA a.k.a. TORA

FOR: Viol. Of Sec. 5, Art. II of R.A. 9165
Pros. Benjamin B. Maido -m for the government
ARRAIGNMENT

3)8620

PEOPLE VS. REYNALDO BALONSONG

FOR: Lascivious Conduct
Pros. Julius C. Padios for the government
ARRAIGNMENT

4)9369-9370

----------

PEOPLE VS. MARLON DEJAROS, ET AL.

FOR: Attempted Murder & Robbery
Atty. Belinda S. Villa - for the accused
Atty. Janus Jarder private prosecutor
PRE-TRIAL/MOTION TO RESET HEARING

5)9302-69

----------

PEOPLE VS. FLORENCIA P. DIAZ

FOR: Estafa
Pros. Benjamin Maido for the government
Atty. Lorebette Grandea - private prosecutor
Atty. Lorenzo Alminaza - for the accused
PRE-TRIAL

6) 3995

----------

PEOPLE VS. ROLANDO CRUZ, ET AL.

FOR: Murder
Pros. Julius C. Padios for the government
Atty. Cecile M. Tamayo for the accused
PRE-TRIAL OF LOPE REAL,JR.

7)9555

----------

PEOPLE VS. MARLON EDANIO

FOR: Murder
Pros. Julius Padios /Pros. Ma. Consolacion Bascug for the government
Atty. Cecile M. Tamayo - for the accused
PRE-TRIAL

8) 8947

----------

PEOPLE VS. RYAN FLOR y GUSTILO

FOR: Viol. Of Sec. 11, Art. II of R.A. 9165
Pros. Benjamin B. Maido - for the government
Atty.Cecile M. Tamayo for the accused
PRE-TRIAL

9) 8868

----------

PEOPLE VS. JUNTE TATOY

FOR: Viol. Of Sec. 5, Art. II of R.A. 9165
Atty. Emmanuel Vinco for the accused
Pros. Benjamin B. Maido for the government
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION

10) 9044

----------

PEOPLE VS. RODOLFO ESTOYA, III

FOR: Homicide
Atty. Janus Jarder private prosecutor
Atty. Reynaldo Depasucat for the accused
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION

11)6732

----------

112) 6604

----------

PEOPLE VS. RENE DESPI

FOR: Frustrated Homicide
Atty. Ryan V. Montoro private prosecutor
Atty. Reynaldo P. Depasucat for theaccused
PEOPLE VS. ARNULFO BAJA
FOR: Homicide
Atty. Reynaldo Depasucat private prosecutor
Atty. Ryan V. Montoro private prosecutor
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION

13) 8790-8791

PEOPLE VS. JOSELITO DELA CRUZ y VASQUEZ, ET AL.

FOR: Viol. Of Secs. 5 & 11, Art. II of R.A. 9165
Pros. Julius C. Padios for the government
Atty. Rafael Atotubo - for the accused
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION

14)8669

----------

PEOPLE VS. EDGAR BIBAS, ET. AL.

FOR: Viol. Of Sec. 15, Art. II of R.A. 9165
Pros. Benjamin Maido for the government
Atty. Cecile M. Tamayo for the accused
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION

15) 8308

----------

PEOPLE VS. WILFREDO DEXIMO, JR.

FOR: Viol. Of Sec. 11, Art. II of R.A. 9165
Pros. Benjamin Maido-for the government
Atty. Cecile M. Tamayo -for the accused
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION

16)9324

PEOPLE VS. JOSEPH MAQUILING y RETOBIS

FOR: Rape
Atty. Cecile M. Tamayo for the accused
Pros. Benjamin B. Maido - for the government
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION

17)3038

----------

PEOPLE VS. JOSE PADRONIA

FOR: Homicide
Atty. Cecile M. Tamayo for the accused
Pros. Julius C. Padios for the government
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION

18) 8039

----------

PEOPLE VS. ROLAND REGALADO, ET AL.

FOR: ARSON
Atty. Cecile M. Tamayo for the accused
Pros. Julius C. Padios for the government
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION

19)8125 & 9394 ----------

PEOPLE VS. RUSTY VARGAS, ET AL

FOR: Frustrated Homicide & Frustrated Murder
Pros. Julius C. Padios for the government
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION

20)5298

PEOPLE VS. DANILO NARANJA

FOR: Homicide
Pros. Julius C. Padios for the government
Atty. Cecile Mesias-Tamayo - for the accused
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE FOR THE DEFENSE

----------

_____________