Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS
Romain Sacchi
1. INTRODUCTION
2. METHOD
A model based on abductive-reasoning lists IS
facilitating mechanisms found in the physical, social
and organizational realms of a selection of successful
and developed cases of IS: Kalundborg, situated in
Denmark, along with the IS cases of Kwinana
(Australia), Styria (Austria), Guayama (Puerto Rico),
Rotterdam (the Netherlands) and a case from the
former Soviet Union, Nikopol (Ukraine).
Fig. 1 Illustration of the model, the stakeholders and the facilitating mechanisms to IS.
5.
REFERENCES
Baas, LW, & Huisingh, D. (2008). The synergistic role of
embeddedness and capabilities in industrial symbiosis:
illustration based upon 12 years of experiences in the
Rotterdam Harbour and Industry Industrial Ecology.
Chertow, M. (2007). Uncovering industrial symbiosis.
Journal of Industrial Ecology.
Chertow, M, & Ehrenfeld, J. (2012). Organizing Self
Organizing Systems. Journal of Industrial Ecology.
Edquist, C., & Edqvist, O. (1979). Social carriers of
techniques for development. Journal of Peace Research,
16(4), 313331.
Lombardi, DR, & Laybourn, P. (2012). Redefining
industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology.
Paquin, RL, & Howard Grenville, J. (2012). The
evolution of facilitated industrial symbiosis. Journal of
industrial Ecology.
Sathre, R, & Grdzelishvili, I. (2006). Industrial symbiosis
in the former Soviet Union. Progress in Industrial
Ecology.
Schwarz, E. J., & Steininger, K. W. (1997). Implementing
natures lesson: the industrial recycling network
enhancing regional development. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 5(1)
Yu, C, Davis, C, & Dijkema, G. (2014). Understanding the
evolution of industrial symbiosis research. Journal of
Industrial Ecology.
CONCLUSIONS