Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Article views: 26
Copyright eContent Management Pty Ltd. Contemporary Nurse (2010) 34(2): 190198.
DIANXU REN
Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
TAMMY M HALEY
Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Bradford Campus, Bradford, PA, USA
JOANN SWITALA
Research Specialist, University of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
LINDA SIEMON
Staff Nurse, Emergency Department, Somerset Hospital, Somerset, PA, USA
ABSTRACT
Aim: To identify and describe gender-related differences in the self-esteem and optimism levels of rural
adolescents. Background: Self-esteem and optimism have been broadly examined and are associated
with health-practices, social interaction, attachment, resiliency, and personal identity. Information
describing the relationship of self-esteem and optimism as it relates to gender is limited. Methods:
Using a cross-sectional survey design, students (N = 193) from three high-schools in rural Pennsylvania,
USA completed the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and the Optimism Scale-Life Orientation TestRevised as part of a National Institute of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research funded
study. Results: Both instruments mean scores were in the range of average for this population, with
females scoring lower than males in both self-esteem (p < 0.0001) and optimism (p < 0.0001). The
results of this study have nursing implications for evidenced based interventions that target self-esteem
and optimism. Attention to self-esteem and optimism in female youth is recommended.
Keywords: adolescents; nursing; optimism; rural; self-esteem
INTRODUCTION
190
CN
BACKGROUND
Self-esteem and optimism are broadly studied concepts throughout the literature, in both
national and international arenas. They have been
studied from many aspects including: family communication, development, parental attachment,
resilience, identity style, bullying, self-harm, and
criminal behaviors. Gender differences have not
been consistently addressed.
Self-esteem
The link between self-esteem and externalizing
problems, such as aggression, antisocial behavior
CN
CN
191
CN
Kathryn R Puskar, Lisa Marie Bernardo, Dianxu Ren, Tammy M Haley, et al.
CN
Optimism
Puskar, Sereika, Lamb, Tusaie-Mumford, and
McGuinness (1999) studied optimism and its
relationship to depression, coping, anger and
life events in 624 rural adolescents in western
Pennsylvania, USA. The Optimism Scale-Life
Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) measure was
used and revealed that females had slightly lower
mean scores than males, no signicant difference
between genders was noted. Huan, Yeo, Ang, and
Chong (2006) studied optimism and gender on
adolescents perception of academic stress using the
Life Orientation Test (LOT) measure. They found
that a signicant negative relationship between
optimism and academic stress, noting that gender
was not a signicant predictor of academic stress.
The concept of optimism was claried by Tusaie
and Patterson (2006) from a study of 132 rural adolescents attending public school who were between
14 and 18 years of age. Participants completed the
LOT-R and the Optimistic Bias Scale (OBS). In
general, adolescents did not believe they were vulnerable to bad experiences. Females were found
to believe that they were more likely to experience
too much stress as compared to males. Results suggested that the inclusion of strategies to maximize
optimistic thinking in situations holds the potential
to inuence the level of resilience in adolescents.
To examine the relationship of optimism to
social support and positive health practices Mahon,
Yarcheski, Yarcheski, and Hanks (2007) utilized
regression analysis to evaluate a sample of 128 adolescents, 1214 years of age. Optimism was found
to be a weak mediator for the relationship between
social support and positive health practices.
CN
METHOD
This descriptive cross-sectional study used a survey design to measure self-esteem and optimism in
adolescents from three rural western Pennsylvania
high schools, USA. These data were collected
at baseline as part of a longitudinal randomized
CN
193
CN
Kathryn R Puskar, Lisa Marie Bernardo, Dianxu Ren, Tammy M Haley, et al.
controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a targeted intervention designed for rural youth. The
school sites were located in areas dened as rural
by the Pennsylvania Department of Rural Health,
USA (Pennsylvania Ofce of Rural Health, 2005).
CN
Measures
Rosenbergs Self-Esteem Scale was developed to
measure adolescents global feelings of self-worth or
self-acceptance (Rosenberg, 1965). It includes ten
items that are scored using a four-point response
ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
Rosenberg (1965) tested 5,024 students to check
the reliability of the self-esteem scale. Internal consistency with Cronbachs alpha was found to be
0.77. Coefcients of reproducibility were 0.91; testretest reliability was 0.85. Scale ranges from 030
and average range is 1525 (Rosenberg, 1965).
Optimism was measured by the Life
Orientation Test Revised (LOT-R). The LOT-R
was designed by Scheier et al. (1994) to measure
optimism by assessing the generalized outcome
expectancies of individuals. The scale consists of
10 items. Each item is scaled on a 5-point Likert
scale with responses ranging from strongly agree
(4 points) to strongly disagree (0 points) with
reverse scoring (on items 3, 7 and 9). The range
is 024 possible points with no normative values.
Greater optimism is represented by higher scores.
The Cronbachs alpha was 0.78, level of internal
consistency acceptable. Data were analyzed using
descriptive and inferential statistical tests. The
level of signicance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS
Analysis of the summative total score for the
Rosenbergs Self-Esteem Scale revealed that
the mean score for male respondents (n = 90,
M = 21.988, SD = 4.916) was higher than the
mean score of female respondents (n = 103,
M = 19.13, SD = 4.795). This nding was noted
to be statistically signicant (t = 4.08, p < 0.0001).
Table 1 outlines the results of Rosenbergs SelfEsteem Scale for this sample by gender.
CN
TABLE 1: GENDER DIFFERENCES FOR ROSENBERG SELF-ESTEEM SCALE (RSES) AND LIFE ORIENTATION TEST SCORES
(LOT-R)
Male
Female
Mean
Standard deviation
Mean
Standard deviation
p value
RSES
21.988
4.916
19.132
4.795
p < 0.0001
LOT-R
14.9
3.48
12.637
4.242
p < 0.0001
DISCUSSION
The results of this study are felt to provide further
evidence for the presence of gender differences in
the level of self-esteem and optimism among rural
adolescents. While the mean scores for self-esteem
and optimism were noted to be within the average
range for adolescents, there was a troubling trend
for signicantly lower scores in rural female adolescents when compared to rural male adolescents.
These ndings are noted to be consistent with
previous research reporting signicantly higher
levels of self-esteem in male youth (Sung et al.,
2006) and lower levels of self esteem in female
youth at all grade levels when compared to their
male counterparts (Birndorf et al., 2005).
In the current study, rural female adolescents
were also noted to have signicantly lower mean
scores for optimism as compared to their male
counterparts. Tusaie and Patterson (2006) found
the same pattern of response with the male participants reporting slightly lower trait optimism
(M = 14.2 SD = 4.4) and the female participants reporting slightly higher levels of optimism
(M = 13.3, SD = 3.1) than those noted in the current examination of rural adolescents. The current study identied that participants scores were
on average neutral (M = 13.69, SD = 4.05) on
CN
195
CN
Kathryn R Puskar, Lisa Marie Bernardo, Dianxu Ren, Tammy M Haley, et al.
CN
Limitations
Limitations of the study include the use of a sample
who were predominately Caucasian and enrolled in
academic programs. The participants were limited
to three rural high schools in western Pennsylvania,
USA. Future research may be done on a greater
number of schools over a larger geographic area
with more racial and academic diversity.
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides further evidence of the presence
of gender differences in childhood and adolescence
with regard to self-esteem and optimism. Consistent
with published reports, rural females were noted to
have lower levels of both selfesteem and optimism
when compared to rural dwelling male youth. The
screening of children and adolescents for low self-esteem and decreased levels of optimism may be indicated to help curb potentially negative outcomes
associated with low levels of these characteristics.
References
Birndorf, S., Ryan, S., Auinger, P., & Aten, M.
(2005). High self-esteem among adolescents:
Longitudinal trends sex differences and protective factors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(3),
194201.
Cantrell, M. A., & Lupinacci, P. (2004). A predictive model of hopefulness for adolescents.
Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(6), 478485.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S. C.
(2010). Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review.
Delfabbro, P., Wineeld, T., Trainor, S., Dollard,
M., Anderson, S., Metzer, J., et al. (2006). Peer
and teacher bullying/victimization of South
Australian secondary school students: Prevalence
and psychosocial proles. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 76, 7190.
Dolea, C. (2009). Increasing access to health workers
in remote and rural areas through improved retention: Background paper for the rst expert meeting
to develop evidence-based recommendations to
increase access to health workers in remote and
rural areas through improved retention. World
Health Organization. Retrieved March 1, 2009,
from http://www.who.int/hrh/migration/background_paper_draft.pdf
Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins,
R. W., Moftt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2005).
CN
CN
197
CN
Kathryn R Puskar, Lisa Marie Bernardo, Dianxu Ren, Tammy M Haley, et al.
198
CN