Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Crop/livesto
ck/
Fish/Forest
Area
(in ha)
Average
Yield/ha
No. of turnover/cropping
seasons/yr
Mineral
Fertilizer
Requirement/
ha/yr
Seed
Requirement
/ha/yr
Annual
productio
n
1. Bgy X
Palay
50
100
cav/ha/cropping
2x
50 cav/ha
25 cav/ha
10,000
cavans
2. Bgy Y
Coconut
(copra)
20
250
kgs/ha/harvest
4x
250 kgs/ha
200 kgs/ha
20,000
kgs
Source :_______________________________________
b.
Table ____ (No.) Population within the Road Influence Area (RIA), YYYY
Barangay
Population
Number
Number of HH
Economically
Active Population
(in %)
2000
400
2.3%
70%
Source :_______________________________________
1 If traffic survey is done along the proposed road site or adjacent existing road. This may be
done through classified manual count and roadside origin-destination
% of
productio
n
Sold in
Market
80%
100%
Barangay
Existing
Mode of
Transport in
the Area
Motorcycle
Jeep
1. Bgy X
No. of
vehicle
Units
10
2
Average
Operating
Days per
year
300
200
Ave. loading
capacity
(in
kilograms)
4
8
Average
No. of daily
trips
Observed
Transport Fares
for
Passenger/Cargo
P10/for both pass.
& cargo
P8/pass
6
2
Average
Traveled
Distance2
5km
5km
Source :_______________________________________
Type of Animal/Human
Origin to
Transport
Destination
Distance
Carabao
From farm to
0.500 km
nearest
barangay rd.
Source :_______________________________________
Transport
Price
P20/sack
Ave.loading
capacity
3 sacks
1. Bgy X
Travel time
WOP
(one way, in
minutes)
30
Travel time
WP
(one way, in
minutes)
15
No. of
working
days
% Share of
Saved Time
for Work
Average Daily
Wage Rate
260
50%
Php200
Source :_______________________________________
1. Brgy. X
Crop
Farm Gate
Price
(Php/sack)
Land
Development cost
per Ha (Php/Ha)
Production
cost per Ha
(Php/Ha)
Marketing cost
per sack
(Php/sack)
Rice
20
Php750 or
Php15/kg
Php50,000
Php20,000
Php12/sack
Source :_______________________________________
1. Bgy X
2. Bgy Y
Crop/
Fish/Forest
Mango
Vegetables
Market Price
(Php/kilogram)
Php 35.00
Php 10.00
Estimated Reduction in
Post-Harvest Losses WP
(in %)
5%
5%
Source:___________________________