Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.emeraldinsight.com/1066-2243.htm
INTR
21,3
214
Chian-Son Yu
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to construct and validate an e-lifestyle scale.
Design/methodology/approach Through a two-step approach of exploratory factor analysis
(EFA), the generated two EFA solutions reveal the adequacy of the generated seven components
underlying the 1,135 responses. By using the other 793 respondents sampling from the same
population, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) examines and supports the fitness of the overall
structure.
Findings The empirical results show that the 39 items of the e-lifestyle scale were grouped into
seven distinct components. These components represented seven principal factors that significantly
influence and shape individual e-lifestyles.
Research limitations/implications This investigation merely represents a starting point in
e-lifestyle research. To enhance the validity and generalization of the scale proposed in this study,
further cross-cultural validation is necessary.
Practical implications Beyond constructing and validating an e-lifestyle instrument, this study
could provide marketers with insights about how to integrate e-lifestyles into marketing strategies.
Originality/value This research contributes to advance current knowledge on what factors
influence e-lifestyle and relative influences of main factors shaping e-lifestyle, and pave a way for
marketers to execute more elaborate marketing research with the proposed e-lifestyle scale.
Keywords Lifestyles, Communication technologeis, Information Technology, Internet, E-lifestyle
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
The convergence of the internet and mobile communications has stimulated
phenomenal influence of information and communication technology (ICT) and
proliferation of ICT-enabled services/products. This has significantly impacted and
changed the context and the way people live in recent years. Since understanding
individual lifestyles has long been considered quite useful in tailoring and delivering
suitable services/products to specific target segments, there is a potential need to
construct an e-lifestyle instrument that could offer marketers a useful basis to
marketing/designing ICT-enabled services/products, commented by some
practitioners such as Mary Modahl (Vice President, Forrester Research Inc.) and
Jason Chian (CEO, InsightXplorer Co.) (Chen and He, 2006). Besides, previous research
has argued that the extant lifestyle instruments almost developed in the 1970s and
1980s (Lin, 2003) may not effectively capture consumers time-conscious (i.e. web-based
Internet Research
Vol. 21 No. 3, 2011
pp. 214-235
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1066-2243
DOI 10.1108/10662241111139282
The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their editorial and constructive
comments. This paper is supported by National Science Council of The Republic of China under
Contact Number: NSC 97-2416-H-158-010.
services) and technology-conscious (i.e. MP3 players) lifestyle (Swinyard and Smith,
2003; Brengman et al., 2005; Allred et al., 2006; Chen and He, 2006).
Motivated by the above and based on the idea that the more you know and
understand about consumers, the more effectively you can communicate and market to
them (Plummer, 1974; Brengman et al., 2005), the primary goal of this study is to
develop and validate an e-lifestyle instrument that could provide marketers some
insights of what triggers peoples e-lifestyles. Accordingly, Section 2 reviews the
dominant lifestyle instruments, and Section 3 constructs an e-lifestyle scale based on
lifestyle theories and related lifestyle rating statements. Given that the extant literature
directly assessing e-lifestyle is absent, this study conducts a panel discussion and a
pre-test group interview to check and revise the initially constructed e-lifestyle scale.
Section 4 performs sampling and data collecting, while Sections 5 and 6 execute
exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Section 7
discusses research implications, and Section 8 addresses limitations of the present
study and further research suggestions.
2. Literature review in lifestyle instruments
The theory-based lifestyle works emerged in the early 1950s (Havinhurst and
Feigenbaum, 1959; Lazar, 1963; Ansbacher, 1976; Anderson and Golden, 1984), the
lifestyle concept was first introduced to help marketers understand consumer behavior
in the late 1950s (Havinhurst and Feigenbaum, 1959) and inaugurated to marketing
research in the early 1960s (Lazar, 1963). Since then, studies have proposed numerous
works on assessing lifestyle. Among various lifestyle scales, two well-known and
widely used lifestyle instruments are activities, interests, opinions (AIO) rating scale,
originally presented by Wells and Tigert in the beginning of 1970s (Wells and Tigert,
1971) and the value, attitude, and life styles (VALS) rating scale, initially developed by
Mitchell in 1983 (Mitchell, 1983).
In an original AIO study profiling individual lifestyles, Wells and Tigert (1971)
defined activities as actual observable behaviors, interests as the continuous paying of
attention to certain objects, and opinions as responses to specific events. Since then,
AIO-based studies have extensively conducted to help marketers deliver specific
services/products to different targeted segments (Wells and Tigert, 1971; Plummer,
1974; Gutman, 1982; Soutar and Clarke, 1983; Bowles, 1988; Thompson and Kaminski,
1993; Bates et al., 2001; Lin, 2003; Swinyard and Smith, 2003; Brunso et al., 2004;
Brengman et al., 2005; Green et al., 2006; Hsu and Chang, 2008; Kumar and Sarkar,
2008; Hur et al., 2010). Literature review indicates the current widely used AIO
instrument, developed by Plummer (Plummer, 1974), consists of 300 rating statements.
By conducting a study assessing the values and lives of Americans in the early
1980s Mitchell and Spengler at the Stanford Research Institute developed an
800-question VALS instrument (Mitchell, 1983, 1994), which covers background
information (i.e. demographics), personal life (i.e. financial issues, habits and activities),
and perceived value (i.e. attitudes and beliefs). Through observing the relations among
individual values, lives, beliefs, and actions, Mitchell discovered that a mixture of
personal life and perceived value determine individual behavior, while perceived
values is a synthesis of individual attitudes, beliefs, hopes, prejudices, and demands
(Mitchell, 1983, 1994). Accordingly, except for activities, interests, and opinions, many
researches (Mitchell, 1983, 1994; Lin, 2003) argued that value is one of the necessary
An e-lifestyle
instrument
215
INTR
21,3
216
of psychological and sociological variables. That is, individual e-lifestyles are predicable
and assessable by psychological and sociological constructs. Therefore, following
prevailing instruments (i.e. AIO, VALS, ROV, and LOV), this study employed four
constructs of e-activities, e-interests, e-opinions, and e-values, shown in Table I, to
evaluate peoples e-lifestyles. As the lifestyle theories suggested, individual lifestyle is a
set of behaviors reflecting individual psychological concerns (internal beliefs) and
sociological consequences (external stimuli). This research operationalizes the e-activities
as observable actions in using ICT-enabled services/products, e-interests as sensible
tendencies to use and know the ICT-enabled services/products, e-opinions as
fundamental response to the matters of ICT-enabled services/products, and e-values
as basic beliefs about ICT-enabled services/products. Notably, the first three constructs
of e-activities, e-interests, e-opinions are based on AIO (Plummer, 1974), while the
construct of e-values is culled from LOV, VALS, and RVS studies (Kahle and Kennedy,
1989; Mitchell, 1994; Johnston, 1995; Lekakos and Giaglis, 2004; Green et al., 2006; Roy
and Goswami, 2007; Harcar and Kaynak, 2008; Zhu et al., 2009).
Through exhaustively reviewing past studies on lifestyle measurement during past
decades, this study found that literature regarding lifestyle assessment was huge
(Wells and Tigert, 1971; Plummer, 1974; Gutman, 1982; Mitchell, 1983; Soutar and
Clarke, 1983; Kahle et al., 1986; Bowles, 1988; Kahle and Kennedy, 1989; Thompson and
Kaminski, 1993; Grunet et al., 1997; Bates et al., 2001; Lin, 2003; Brunso et al., 2004;
Green et al., 2006; Hsu and Chang, 2008; Kumar and Sarkar, 2008, Jensen, 2009), but
none of the studies directly assessed peoples e-lifestyles and only a few lifestyle-based
studies were conducted in ICT-related domains (Damodaran, 2001; Kim et al., 2001;
Swinyard and Smith, 2003; Lekakos and Giaglis, 2004; Yang, 2004; Brengman et al.,
2005; Allred et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2009; Ahmad et al., 2010). Among
these few studies, Damodaran (2001) explored human factors and lifestyles in digital
technology world, Kim et al. (2001) proposed a 27-item internet users lifestyle,
Swinyard and Smith (2003) applied 38-item statements to assess internet shoppers
lifestyles, Lekakos and Giaglis (2004) analyzed consumer lifestyles for delivering
personalized advertisements via digital interactive television, Yang (2004) constructed
a 30-item statements to assess internet users lifestyle, Brengman et al. (2005) proposed
a 38-item battery to assess internet shoppers web-usage- related lifestyle, Allred et al.
(2006) extended and replicated the work of Swinyard and Smith (2003), Zhu et al. (2009)
adopted 56-items China-VALS to survey consumer lifestyles in the mobile phone
market, and Lee et al. (2009) adapted AIO statements and national consumer lifestyle
e-Activities
e-Interests
e-Opinions
e-Values
Work
Hobbies
Social events
Vocation
Entertainment
Club membership
Community
Shopping
Sports
Family
Home
Job
Community
Recreation
Fashion
Food
Media
Achievements
Themselves
Social issues
Politics
Business
Economics
Education
Production
Future
Culture
Respected
Accomplishment
Fulfillment
Relationships with others
Expectation
Prejudices
Hopes
Demands
An e-lifestyle
instrument
217
Table I.
Constructs used to
measure e-lifestyle
INTR
21,3
218
Constructs
Items
e-activities
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
e-interests
e-opinions
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
An e-lifestyle
instrument
219
Table II.
Items used to assess
e-activities, e-interests,
e-opinions, and e-values
INTR
21,3
220
Constructs
Items
e-values
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Table II.
Notes: After a two-step EFA analysis conducted in Section 5, some items of 52 original items will be
removed. Therefore, the items, finally removed, were expressed in italics to let readers easily identify them
Category
Number of respondents
Percentage
Gender
Male
Female
546
589
48.1
51.9
Age
Less than 20 years old
20-24 years old
25-29 years old
30-34 years old
35-39 years old
40-44 years old
above 45 years old
50
501
255
134
90
60
45
4.4
44.1
22.5
11.8
8.0
5.2
4.0
Occupation
Manufacturing
ICT-related service
Banking/financial/insurance
Media/publishing
Retail/distribution
Restate/construction
Medical/hospital/bio-tech
Education/culture
Military/police
Student
Government/non-profit sector
SOHO
House keeping
Others
89
46
47
44
46
22
49
48
22
447
38
72
106
59
7.8
4.0
4.1
3.8
4.0
1.9
4.3
4.2
1.9
39.4
3.3
6.3
9.3
5.2
Education
Senior High Diploma or Below
Associate Bachelor Degree
Bachelor Degree
Master Degree
Ph.D. Degree
87
169
632
231
16
7.6
14.9
55.7
20.4
1.4
Monthly income
Less than NT$ 15,000
NT$ 15,000-24,999
NT$ 25,000-34,999
NT$ 35,000-44,999
NT$ 45,000-54,999
NT$ 55,000-64,999
Over NT$ 65,000
511
122
144
114
102
83
59
45.0
10.7
12.7
10.0
9.0
7.3
5.2
the respondents reflect the age distribution of the current population. Following the
past studies suggestion (De Bruwer and Haydam, 1996; Yang, 2004), this research
trained four research assistants and dispatched them to recruit respondents in several
Taipei downtown areas in the mornings, afternoons, and evenings during ten
weekdays and two weekends, to remove potential sampling biases. After a two-week
survey, 793 valid respondents were collected to resemble the age distribution of
Taiwanese population, as shown in Table IV.
An e-lifestyle
instrument
221
Table III.
The profile of sample 1
INTR
21,3
222
Table IV.
The profile of sample 2
Category
Number of respondents
Percentage
Gender
Male
Female
386
407
48.7
51.3
Age
Less than 20 years old
20-30 years old
30-40 years old
40-50 years old
50-60 years old
above 60 years old
178
125
131
128
107
124
22.5
15.8
16.5
16.1
13.5
15.6
Occupation
Manufacturing
ICT-related service
Banking/financial/insurance
Media/publishing
Retail/distribution
Restate/construction
Medical/hospital/bio-tech
Education/culture
Military/police
Student
Government/non-profit sector
SOHO
House keeping
Others
44
22
18
16
21
5
25
27
7
426
17
70
7
24
5.5
13.5
15.4
9.2
4.9
4.4
1.9
4.3
3.0
30.5
1.1
2.3
1.3
2.6
Education
Senior High Diploma or Below
Associate Bachelor Degree
Bachelor Degree
Master Degree
PhD Degree
166
103
363
152
9
21.0
13.0
45.8
19.2
1.1
Monthly income
Less than NT$ 15,000
NT$ 15,000-24,999
NT$ 25,000-34,999
NT$ 35,000-44,999
NT$ 45,000-54,999
NT$ 55,000-64,999
Over NT$ 65,000
282
77
103
142
91
80
18
35.6
9.7
13.0
17.9
11.5
10.1
2.3
e-activities range from 0.781 to 0.899 (mean 0:846, SD 0:053). Next, to extract
factors from the data set and determine the number of factors which best explain the
relationships among dataset items, a two-step approach using EFA was adopted.
This research adopted a two-step approach because of the criticism that EFA is an
internally driven analysis method with few criteria for evaluating its results (Green
et al., 2006). Accordingly, this study randomly divided the collected respondents via
online sampling into two independent samples (one is called development sample and
the other is called replication samples) using SPSS Random Selection. Thereafter, this
work conducted EFA using the principal components method with varimax rotation on
both development and replication samples based on the assumption that the exact
number of dimensions underlying a set of data is unknown. This study independently
executed an identical series of EFA steps for each sample.
Following past research suggestions (DeVellis, 2003; Thompson, 2004; Green et al.,
2006), this study adopted four criteria to evaluate the EFA principal component
solutions. First, this work assesses the percentage variances explained by each
individual component and the overall set of components. That is, the variance
accounted for by each component is employed to determine whether the component
contributes significantly to the solution. The second evaluative criterion was the
occurrence of simple structure. Simple structure means that each item loads strongly
on only one component. Items that have strong relationships with more than one
component are termed cross-loading items. Cross-loading item may cause problems
when interpreting the EFA solution. In this study, items are considered as component
markers if their loading value was greater than 0.6. In contrast, lower
item-to-component correlations were determined if items were not closely associated
with other components. Third, this study evaluates the solution by the absence of
specific components. Specific components are dimensions consisting of just one or two
items, which frequently indicate over factoring of the data set. Finally, the study judges
the solution based on its interpretability. This criterion is arguably the most important,
because for the solution to be useful it must be substantively important based on
researcher knowledge of the content area (DeVellis, 2003; Green et al., 2006).
According to the above four criteria, the study extracted seven factors from 39 items
out of 52 items, displayed in Table V. Notably, Table V shows replication sample
loadings, eigenvalues, percentage of variance accounted by each factor, and Cronbach
alpha values in parenthesis. Table V shows the generated EFA results indicate good
inter-item consistency reliability and convergent validity, since all factor loading
exceeding 0.611 and the computed Cronbach alpha values ranging from 0.728 to 0.869
in the development sample data while ranging from 0.745 to 0.853 in the replication
sample data. Besides, the computed total variances explained by the generated
seven-component solution across the 568 observations in the development sample and
across the 567 observations in the replication sample are 62.842 percent and 63.591
percent, respectively. Therefore, the predictive validity is supported. Overall, the two
EFA solutions revealing 39 items under the seven components are validated and
reliable across the four criteria evaluating the EFA principal component solutions.
The computed EFA solutions indicate that Factor 1 (F1) contains nine items:
ICT-enabled services/products greatly enhance the convenience of my life, ICT-enabled
services/products greatly improve my job efficiency, I frequently use ICT-enabled
services/products to read news or get data, I frequently shop or make purchase via
An e-lifestyle
instrument
223
INTR
21,3
Factor loadings
224
Table V.
EFA results of the
development and
replication samples
Factor
Q40
Q41
Q12
Q03
Q05
Q01
Q52
Q46
Q47
Factor
Q13
Q14
Q16
Q15
Q19
Q38
Factor
Q02
Q04
Q23
Q20
Q48
Factor
Q06
Q07
Q43
Q42
Q09
Factor
Q51
Q18
Q33
Q27
Q31
Factor
Q45
Q44
Q28
Q36
Q32
Factor
Q21
Q17
Q22
Q39
Eigenvalue
Percentage of
variance
accounted by
each factor
Cronbach alpha
values
7.726
(6.915)
19.316
(17.288)
0.763
(0.831)
4.043
(4.357)
10.11%
(10.940)
0.772
(0.820)
3.988
(4.273)
9.973
(10.728)
0.782
(0.853)
3.130
(3.181)
7.828
(7.998)
0.869
(0.839)
2.762
(3.357)
6.909
(7.313)
0.741
(0.763)
1.967
(2.047)
4.915
(5.117)
0.728
(0.745)
1.515
(1.683)
4.136
(4.209)
0.801
(0.803)
1
0.823
0.815
0.812
0.798
0.756
0.723
0.712
0.665
0.615
(0.856)
(0.822)
(0.765)
(0.698)
(0.649)
(0.715)
(0.722)
(0.617)
(0.649)
0.865
0.864
0.829
0.817
0.811
0.686
(0.892)
(0.877)
(0.801)
(0.815)
(0.836)
(0.712)
0.798
0.739
0.720
0.682
0.672
(0.812)
(0.754)
(0.803)
(0.793)
(0.712)
0.873
0.860
0.778
0.758
0.741
(0.886)
(0.824)
(0.847)
(0.734)
(0.816)
0.828
0.812
0.799
0.767
0.621
(0.877)
(0.869)
(0.813)
(0.762)
(0.788)
0.813
0.755
0.733
0.729
0.717
(0.787)
(0.748)
(0.706)
(0.765)
(0.764)
0.857
0.745
0.737
0.687
(0.844)
(0.810)
(0.865)
(0.753)
Notes: Replication sample loadings, eigenvalues, percentage of variance accounted by each factor,
and Cronbach alpha values are provided in parenthesis
An e-lifestyle
instrument
225
INTR
21,3
226
Latent
variables Observed variables (scale items)
F1
F2
F3
F4
Loadings
(l values)
An e-lifestyle
instrument
CR
AVE
0.836
227
0.835
0.821
0.791
0.953
0.693
0.920
0.659
0.942
0.767
0.914
0.682
0.784
0.758
0.749
0.664
0.619
0.871
0.853
0.815
0.781
0.754
0.696
0.796
0.792
0.738
0.699
0.664
0.877
0.857
0.758
0.746
0.738
(continued)
Table VI.
CFA results of the
constructed seven-factor
e-lifestyle scale
INTR
21,3
Latent
variables Observed variables (scale items)
F5
228
F6
F7
Table VI.
Loadings
(l values)
CR
AVE
0.925
0.711
0.917
0.689
0.914
0.598
0.835
0.834
0.809
0.787
0.759
0.827
0.813
0.802
0.764
0.772
0.843
0.825
0.786
0.766
behaviors and marketing strategies cannot be asserted, which may explain why during
the past several decades hundreds of scales have been developed across domains.
Consequently, the e-lifestyle instrument constructed and validated in this work could
offer marketers a useful basis to execute more elaborate marketing research.
The empirical results show that the 39 items of the e-lifestyle scale were grouped
into seven distinct components. These components represented seven principal factors
that significantly influence and shape individual e-lifestyles. Table V shows that the
explained variance of peoples e-lifestyle accounted by top three factors was
17.288-19.316 percent, 10.112-10.940 percent, and 9.973-10.728 percent, while the
explained variance accounted by the lowest three factors was 4.136-4.209 percent,
4.915-5.117 percent, and 6.909-7.313 percent. These figures illustrated that the influence
of each of these seven factors on stimulating individual e-lifestyles is unequal. This
outcome is consistent with the results of past studies, which concluded that the weight
of each factor in influencing individual lifestyles is different rather than similar (Wang
et al., 2006).
needs-driven e-lifestyle
interest-driven e-lifestyle
entertainment-driven e-lifestyle
sociability-driven e-lifestyle
perceived importance-driven e-lifestyle
uninterested or concern-driven e-lifestyle
novelty-driven e-lifestyle
F1:
F2:
F3:
F4:
F5:
F6:
F7:
0.832
0.389 * *
0.175 * *
0.480 * *
0.382 * *
20.103 * *
0.345 * *
F1
0.812
0.225 * *
0.415 * *
0.424 * *
20.155 * *
0.659 * *
F2
0.876
0.211 *
0.121 * *
2 0.076 *
0.204 * *
F3
0.826
0.351 * *
20.0083 *
0.363 * *
F4
0.845
20.125 * *
0.376 * *
F5
F7
0.773
F6
0.830
2 0.078 *
An e-lifestyle
instrument
229
Table VII.
Discriminant validity and
correlations among the
constructs
INTR
21,3
230
An e-lifestyle
instrument
231
INTR
21,3
232
References
Ahmad, N., Omar, A. and Ramayah, T. (2010), Consumer lifestyles and online shopping
continuance intention, Business Strategy Series, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 227-43.
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior,
Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Allred, C.R., Smith, S.M. and Swinyard, W.R. (2006), E-shopping lovers and fearful
conservatives: a market segmentation analysis, International Journal of Retail &
Distribution Management, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 308-33.
Anderson, W.T. and Golden, L.L. (1984), Lifestyle and psychographics: a critical review and
recommendation, in Kinnear, T.C. (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11,
Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 405-11.
Ansbacher, H.L. (1976), Life style: a historical and systematic review, Journal of Individual
Psychology, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 191-212.
Bates, J.M., Cooper, D.L. and Wachs, P.M. (2001), Assessing wellness in college students:
a validation of the salubrious lifestyle scale of the student developmental task and lifestyle
assessment, Journal of College Student Development, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 93-203.
Beatty, S.E., Kahle, L.R., Homer, P. and Misra, S. (1985), Alternative measurement approaches to
consumer values: the list of values and the Rokeach value survey, Psychology and
Marketing, Vol. 293, pp. 181-200.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001a), Understanding information systems continuance:
an expectation-confirmation model, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 351-63.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001b), An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce
service continuance, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 201-14.
Bowles, T. (1988), Does classifying people by lifestyle really help the advertiser?, European
Research, pp. 17-24.
Brengman, M., Genuens, M., Weijters, B., Smith, S.M. and Swinyard, W.R. (2005), Segmenting
internet shoppers based on their web-usage-related lifestyles: a cross-cultural validation,
Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, pp. 79-88.
Brunso, K., Scholderer, J. and Grunert, K.G. (2004), Closing the gap between values and behavior
a means-end theory and lifestyle, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, pp. 665-78.
Chen, T.Y. and He, Q.Y. (2006), Applying decision tree techniques to segmentation bases for
e-marketing, Management Science Research, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1-25.
Damodaran, L. (2001), Human factors in the digital work: enhancing lifestyle the challenge for
emerging technologies, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 55 No. 4,
pp. 377-404.
De Bruwer, W.J. and Haydam, N.E. (1996), Reducing bias in shopping mall-intercept surveys:
the time-based systematic sampling method, South African Journal of Business
Management, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 9-16.
DeVellis, R.F. (2003), Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 2nd ed., Sage, New York, NY.
Dillman, D.A., Snyth, J.D. and Christian, L.M. (2008), Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys:
The Tailored Design Method, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, NY.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable
variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50.
Green, G.T., Cordell, H.K., Betz, C.J. and DiStefano, C. (2006), Construction and validation of the
national survey on recreation and the environments lifestyles scale, Journal of Leisure
Research, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 513-35.
Grunet, K.G., Brunso, K. and Bisp, S. (1997), Food-related lifestyle: development of a
cross-culturally valid instrument for market surveillance, in Kanle, L.R. and Chiagouria,
L. (Eds), Values, Lifestyles, and Psychographics, Lawrence Eribaum Association, Mahwah,
NJ, pp. 337-54.
Gutman, J. (1982), A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes,
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 60-72.
Harcar, T. and Kaynak, E. (2008), Lifestyle orientation of rural US and Canadian consumers,
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 433-54.
Havinhurst, R.J. and Feigenbaum, K. (1959), Leisure and life style, American Sociologist, Vol. 64
No. 1, pp. 396-404.
Hsu, J.L. and Chang, K.M. (2008), Purchase of clothing and its linkage to family communication
and lifestyles among young adults, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management,
Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 147-51.
Hur, W.M., Kim, H.K. and Park, J. (2010), Food and situation-specific lifestyle segmentation of
kitchen appliance market, British Food Journal, Vol. 112 No. 3, pp. 294-312.
Jensen, M. (2009), Lifestyle: suggesting mechanisms and a definition from a cognitive science
perspective, Environ. Dev. Sustain., Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 215-28.
Johnston, C.S. (1995), The Rokeach value survey: underlying structure and multidimensional
scaling, The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 129 No. 5, pp. 583-97.
Kahle, L.R. and Kennedy, P. (1989), Using the list of values (LOV) to understand consumers,
Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 5-12.
Kahle, L.R., Beatty, S.E. and Homer, P. (1986), Alternative measurement approaches to
consumer values: the list of values (LOV) and values and life style (VALS), Journal of
Consumer Research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 405-9.
Kamakura, W.A. and Wedel, M. (2000), Factor analysis and missing data, Journal of Marketing
Research, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 490-8.
Kaye-Blake, W., OConnell, A. and Lamb, C. (2007), Potential market segments for genetically
modified food: results from cluster analysis, Agribusiness, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 567-83.
Kelly, G.A. (1955), The Psychology of Personal Constructs, 1st ed., Norton, New York, NY.
Kim, K.H., Park, J.Y., Kim, D.Y. and Moon, H.I. (2001), Internet user lifestyle: its impact on the
effectiveness of internet advertising in Korea, 2001 Conference, American Academy of
Advertising, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Klein, S.B., Astrachan, J.H. and Smyrnios, K.X. (2005), The F-PEC scale of family influence:
construction, validation, and further implication for theory, Entrepreneurship Theory and
Practice, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 321-39.
Kline, R.B. (1998), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Guildford, New York,
NY.
Kumar, R.V. and Sarkar, A. (2008), Psychographic segmentation of Indian urban consumers,
Journal of Asia Pacific Economy, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 204-21.
An e-lifestyle
instrument
233
INTR
21,3
234
Lastovicka, J.L. and Bonfield, E.H. (1980), Exploring the nomological validity of lifestyle types,
in Olson, J.C. (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 7, Association for Consumer
Research, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 466-72.
Lazar, W. (1963), Life style concepts and marketing, in Stephen, A.G. (Ed.), Toward Scientific
Marketing, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 143-51.
Lee, H.J., Lim, H., Jolly, L.D. and Lee, J. (2009), Consumer lifestyles and adoption of
high-technology products: a case of South Korea, Journal of International Consumer
Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 153-67.
Lekakos, G. and Giaglis, G.M. (2004), A lifestyle-based approach for delivering personalized
advertisements in digital interactive television, Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 1-18.
Lewis, B.R., Templeton, G.F. and Byrd, T.A. (2005), A methodology for construct development
in MIS research, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 388-400.
Lin, F.Y. (2003), An analysis of hospitality consumer lifestyles in the United States, PhD
dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
Malhotra, Y. (1999), Bringing the adopter back into the adoption process: a personal
construction framework of information technology adoption, The Journal of High
Technology Management Research, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 79-104.
Maslow, A.H. (1970), Motivation and Personality, 2nd ed., Harper, New York, NY.
Mitchell, A. (1983), The Nine American Lifestyles, Warner, New York, NY.
Mitchell, V.-W. (1994), How to identify psychographic segment: Part I, Marketing Intelligence &
Planning, Vol. 12 No. 7, pp. 4-10.
Neimeyer, R.A. and Neimeyer, G.J. (2002), Advances in Personal Construct Psychology, 5th ed.,
Praeger, New York, NY.
Novak, T.P. and MacEvoy, B. (1990), On comparing alternative segmentation schemes: the list
of values (LOV) and values and life styles (VALS), Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17
No. 1, pp. 105-9.
Palmgreen, P. (1984), Uses and gratifications: a theoretical perspective, in Bostrom, R.N. (Ed.),
Communication Yearbook, Vol. 8, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 61-72.
Plummer, J.T. (1974), The concept and application of life style segmentation, Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 33-7.
Punj, G. and Stewart, D.W. (1983), Clustering analysis in marketing research: review and
suggestions for application, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 134-48.
Riche, M.F. (1989), Psychographics for the 1990s, American Demographics, Vol. 13 No. 7,
pp. 24-53.
Rogers, E.M. (2003), Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed., The Free Press, New York, NY.
Rokeach, M. (1973), The Nature of Human Values, The Free Press, New York, NY.
Roy, S. and Goswami, P. (2007), Structural equation modeling of value-psychographic
trait-clothing purchase behavior: a study on the urban college-goers of India, Young
Consumers, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 269-77.
Sax, L.J., Gilmartin, S.K. and Bryant, A.N. (2003), Assessing response rates and nonresponses
bias in web and paper surveys, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 409-32.
Soutar, G.N. and Clarke, Y.M. (1983), Life style and radio listening patterns in Perth, Western
Australia, Australian Journal of Management, pp. 71-81.
Swinyard, W.R. and Smith, S.M. (2003), Why people (dont) shop online: a lifestyle study of the
internet consumer, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 567-97.
Thompson, A.M. and Kaminski, P.F. (1993), Psychographic and lifestyle antecedents of service
quality expectations: a segmentation approach, The Journal of Service Marketing, Vol. 7
No. 4, pp. 53-61.
Thompson, B. (2004), Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts
and Applications, American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
Van Raaij, W.F. and Verhallen, T.M.M. (1994), Domain-specific market segmentation,
European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 10, pp. 49-66.
Veroff, J., Douvan, E. and Kulka, R.A. (1981), The Inner America, Basic Books, New York, NY.
Walters, G.D. (2006), Lifestyle Theory: Past, Present, and Future, Nova Science Publishers,
Commack, NY.
Wang, E.T.G., Yeh, H.Y. and Jiang, J. (2006), The relative weights of internet shopping
fundamental objectives: individual lifestyle differences, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 23
No. 5, pp. 353-67.
Wang, Z., Rao, C.P. and DAuria, A. (1994), A comparison of the RVS in China and The United
States, in Cote, J.A. and Leong, S.M. (Eds), Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research,
Vol. 1, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 185-90.
Wells, W. (1975), Psychographics: a critical review, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XII,
pp. 196-213.
Wells, W. and Tigert, D. (1971), Activities, interests, and opinions, Journal of Advertising
Research, Vol. 11, pp. 27-35.
Yang, K.C.C. (2004), A comparison of attitudes towards internet advertising among lifestyle
segments in Taiwan, Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 195-212.
Yu, C.S. and Tao, Y.H. (2009), Understanding business-level innovation technology adoption,
Technovation, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 92-109.
Zeithaml, V.A., Rust, R.T. and Lemon, K.N. (2001), The customer pyramid: creating and serving
profitable customers, California Management Review, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 118-45.
Zhu, H., Wang, Q., Yan, L. and Wu, G. (2009), Are consumers what they consume? Linking
lifestyle segmentation to product attributes: an exploratory study of the Chinese mobile
phone market, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 295-314.
Further reading
Geen, R. (1994), Human Motivation: A Psychological Approach, Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont,
CA.
Corresponding author
Chian-Son Yu can be contacted at: csyu@mail.usc.edu.tw
An e-lifestyle
instrument
235