Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Macam
DOCTRINE: Where one of two conflicting sales of
a piece of land was executed before the land was
registered, while the other was an execution sale
in favor of the judgment creditor of the owner
made after the same property had been
registered, what should determine the issue are
the provisions of the last paragraph of Section 35,
Rule 39 of the Rules of Court to the effect that,
upon the execution and delivery of the final
certificate of sale in favor of the purchaser of land
sold in an execution sale, such purchaser shall be
substituted to and acquire all the rights, title,
interest and claim of the judgment debtor to the
property as of the time of the levy.
FACTS:
1. Sammy Maron and his seven brothers and
sisters were pro indiviso owners of a parcel
of unregistered land in Pangasinan.
2. While their application for registration of
said land under Act No. 496 was pending,
they executed two deeds of sale conveying
the property to appellee [Macam] who
thereafter took possession thereof and
introduced
substantial
improvements
therein.
3. One month later, OCT was issued in favor of
the
Marons
free
from,
lien
and
encumbrances.
4. By virtue of a final judgment rendered in
Civil Case No. 42215 against Sammy Maron
in favor of the Manila Trading and Supply
Emergency Digest:
-Sammy Maron and his siblings were pro indiviso
owners of a parcel of land which they sold to
appellee Macam pending its registration uder Act
No. 496.
-by virtue of the decision in a civil case against
Sammy Maron in facor of Manila Trading and
Supply Company, levy was made upon his interest
in the property and it was thereafter sold at a
public auction. Final sale was made in favor of
Manila Trading and Supply Co. And the latter
subsequently sold all its rights to the property to
Dagupan Trading.
ISSUE: Who has a better right to the share of
Sammy Maron to the roperty?
HELD: Where one of two conflicting sales of a
piece of land was executed before the land was
registered, while the other was an execution sale
in favor of the judgment creditor of the owner
made after the same property had been
registered, what should determine the issue are
the provisions of the last paragraph of Section 35,
Rule 39 of the Rules of Court to the effect that,
upon the execution and delivery of the final
certificate of sale in favor of the purchaser of land
sold in an execution sale, such purchaser shall be
substituted to and acquire all the rights, title,
interest and claim of the judgment debtor to the
property as of the time of the levy.