0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
63 просмотров2 страницы
This Project's Agenda To describe and analyze an artifact to in a way that provides alternative cultural value, beliefs and representations. Each student will rhetorically analyze the artifact from his / her own cultural encounter and / or experience to the object.
This Project's Agenda To describe and analyze an artifact to in a way that provides alternative cultural value, beliefs and representations. Each student will rhetorically analyze the artifact from his / her own cultural encounter and / or experience to the object.
This Project's Agenda To describe and analyze an artifact to in a way that provides alternative cultural value, beliefs and representations. Each student will rhetorically analyze the artifact from his / her own cultural encounter and / or experience to the object.
& Online) Group Presentation: March 2-4 Oct 17: Final Draft + 1pg. group reflections (D2L 5:00pm) Individual Final Paper Due: Friday, March 6 @ 5pm D2L
Individual Paper length-1800-2000
words (plus works cited page), doublespaced,12-point font Presentation Length: 20mins Grade: 15% 5% Group Proposal & writing processes (Peer Response, workshop, reading annotation) 5% Individual Paper 5% Group Presentation
What is it? The Cultural Artifact Analysis
Earlier in the semester, we define Culture as: a way of practice to create, preserve, and/or pass on new or old knowledges and understandings. Artifact (Webster): An object made by a human being, typically an item of cultural or historical interest. This Projects Agenda To describe and analyze an artifact to in a way that provides alternative cultural value, beliefs and representations. Method: How its done You will work in groups of three to collectively agree on an artifact. Then each student will rhetorically analyze the artifact from his/her own cultural encounter and/or experience to the artifact. Project Requirement Project Proposal & Writing Processes (5%) o Individual Project Proposal: write a one page (300-400 words) that describes the selected artifact. Connect artifact to larger cultural implications including your personal encounter to the object. o Group Proposal 4-5-pages total should include the following: Proposal length 500-600 words (about 2 pages) Include the common thread/theme that unifies your object. Proposal should indicate each team members point/place of analysis. One-page detailed and specific presentation outline. One-page project plan that includes your method of analysis. One-page project management plan that describes each member duties and responsibilities. Individual Paper (5%): 1800-2000 Each student will approach the groups selected cultural artifactan objects, pieces of clothes, things people see, touch and useful for everyday practices; excluding technological tools, bread, pizza, facial hair, cheese, etc. Your paper should provide a critical cultural analysis and insight into the habits, values, and beliefs surrounding the artifact.
WRA || 125 || Projects II || Fofana
WRA 125:: Project II
Group Class Presentation (5%): 20 mins: Each group will present its collective artifact analysis to the class. Presentation will account for each student alternative approach and its cultural significance. Each team member should speak for at least 5mins during the presentation. Research sources This project does not require research, but rather should rely on your expertise as a member of the culture and community. On that note your analysis should be thoughtful, includes deep connection; thoughtful and careful explanation. Support your object analysis argument/claim with clear and specific evidence from your cultural encounter with the object. Again, avoid doing any form of research for this project. However, if you choose to do research, you must cite using MLA format. Learning objectives To gain practice in processes of inquiry: forming & asking questions, revising questions, & seeking answers To inquire into cultural values and/or practices To increase analytical, rhetorical, and critical skills To consider audience and genre as functions of purpose Grading Rubric || individual paper Criteria Project Proposal- 20% Your project proposal should be detailed, thorough, and insightful. It should describe the cultural object in detail including the culture and community its identifies with. Also provide the alternative angle you intend to address within your paper and eventually in your group presentation. Rhetorical Analysis30%: Your analysis of the artifact is detailed, thorough, and insightful. You discuss what meaning the artifact has, how that meaning was made, and what implications the meaning has for the people who use the artifact. You identify the ways the artifact changes or influences behavior or thoughts. You avoid identifying the culture to which the object belongs as "everyone"--try to be specific. Claims and examples/evidence10%: You support your analysis with evidence, description, and examples related to your groups artifact, observations, and sources. Context20%: You provide the social, historical, and cultural context for your audience by discussing the history of object and examining alternative angles of its use and practice Style10%: Youve effectively targeted your intended audience through use of descriptive details and varied sentence structures; appropriate diction (variety of words); avoids clich; appropriate voice (passive, active); exploration of new vocabulary Format5%: paper is correctly formatted and 1800-2000 words long; pages are numbered, double spaced, and in 12pt font with 1 margins. Sources are cited intext and on a works cited page in MLA citation style. Mechanics5%: Your essay is reasonably well-proofed so errors do not interfere with readers ability to clearly understand content of paper.