Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
Polymerization of acetylene was rst achieved by Natta and his co-workers using
a Ti-based catalyst (1). Because of the lack of processability and stability, early
studies on polyacetylenes were motivated by theoretical and spectroscopic interests only. Then the discovery of the metallic conductivity of doped polyacetylene
(26) stimulated research into the chemistry of polyacetylene, and now polyacetylene is recognized as one of the most important conjugated polymers. The nding
by Natta and co-workers was followed by the modication of their catalytic system. An explosive expansion in polyacetylene chemistry has been caused by the
entry of the Shirakawa catalyst Ti(O-n-C4 H9 )4 (C2 H5 )3 Al. Its very unique ability
to give a thin lm of polyacetylene (7,8) has attracted the interest of solid-state
physicists, which has signicantly contributed to the fundamental chemistry of
conjugated macromolecules.
Unfortunately, the intractability and unstability of polyacetylene strictly inhibit its practical applications. Thus, an introduction of substituents onto polyacetylene backbone has been investigated to improve its processability. Early
attempts led to the conclusion that only sterically unhindered monosubstituted
acetylenes can be polymerized with the Ti-based ZieglerNatta catalysts. Traditional ionic and radical initiators also lack the ability to provide high molecular
weight polymers from substituted acetylenes. In 1974 the rst successful polymerization of substituted acetylene was achieved when it was found that Group
6 transition metals are quite active for the polymerization of phenylacetylene to
a polymer with molecular weight over 104 (9). After this nding, there has been
much effort to develop highly active catalysts, to tune the polymer properties, and
1
Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology. Copyright John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Vol. 1
also to precisely control the polymer structure. These energetic studies have produced a wide variety of polymers from acetylene derivatives including mono- and
disubstituted acetylenes, ,-diynes, and 1,3-diacetylenes. The carboncarbon alternating double bonds in main chains of these polymers provide an opportunity to
obtain unique properties such as conductivity, nonlinear optical properties, magnetic properties, permeability, photo- and electroluminescent properties, and so
on, which are not accessible from the corresponding vinyl polymers.
Many papers in the literature have followed the nding by Masuda and coworkers (9). This article covers the literature from the mid-1980s up to mid-2000.
As a result of the rapid growth in the area, the chemistry of polymers from acetylene, 1,3-diacetylenes, and ,-diacetylenes are excluded (see POLYACETYLENE;
DIACETYLENE and TRIACETYLENE POLYMERS). The rst focus is on the polymerization reaction of substituted acetylenes with various transition metal catalysts.
The synthesis of functionally designed polyacetylenes is also covered. Readers are
encouraged to access other reviews and monographs on polyacetylene (1014), on
1,3-diacetylenes (1519), and on ,-diynes (20,21). Previous review articles are
also helpful to survey the chemistry of substituted polyacetylenes (10,13,2229).
Polymerization Catalysts
A variety of transition metal catalysts have been found to polymerize substituted
acetylenes. Effective catalysts range from Group 3 to Group 10 metals. Activity of
catalysts greatly depends on monomer structure; therefore, it is quite important
to recognize the characteristics of each catalyst. Table 1 lists recent representative
examples for the polymerization of substituted acetylenes with various transition
metal catalysts, which will help readers to understand the general features of
catalysts.
Group 3 Transition Metals. Examples for the polymerization of substituted acetylenes with Group 3 transition metals are rather limited (134).
ZieglerNatta catalysts based on Group 3 transition metals polymerize acetylene
and its derivatives (32,33,62). The combination of Sc or lanthanide transition
metals with trialkylaluminum, eg, M(naphthenate) and M(phosphonate)i(C4 H9 )3 Al, has been proven to provide high molecular weight polymers from
terminal aliphatic and aromatic alkynes. High molecular weight polymers
(M n > 30,000) are available from aliphatic linear alkynes such as 1-hexyne
and 1-pentyne, whereas 1-alkynes with branching at or -position, eg,
3-methyl-1-pentyne and 4-methyl-1-pentyne, result in polymers in low yields
(32,33). In a similar way, phenylacetylene polymerizes in the presence of a ternary
Table 1. Substituted Acetylenes That Form High Molecular Weight Polymers with Transition Metal Catalysts
Monomer
[A] Monosubstituted aliphatic
acetylenes [HC CR]
R = n-C4 H9
CH(CH3 )C2 H5
C(CH3 )3
M n , 103
Reference
170
35
27
13
33
149
335
28
[]=1.22
610
30,31
32,33
34
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
MoCl5 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
15
96
40
41
121
14
41
42
Catalyst
Table 1. (Continued)
Monomer
Si(CH3 )2 -n-C6 H13
CH(n-C5 H11 )Si(CH3 )3
n-C6 F13
CO2 -n-C4 H9
CO2 CH3
CO2 H
CO2 -()-menthyl
CH2 N(CH3 )2
CH2 OH
CH2 -N-indolyl
CH2 CH(CO2 C2 H5 )PO(OC2 H5 )2
CH2 + P(C6 H5 )3 B(C6 H5 )4
[B] Monosubstituted aromatic acetylenes
Phenylacetylenes [HC CC6 H4 R]
R=H
p-n-C4 H9
Catalyst
M n , 103
Reference
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
NbCl5
Mo(CO)6 CCl4 h
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
[(nbd)RhCl]2
MoCl5 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
MoCl5
(CpRuCl2 )2
[(nbd)RhCl]2 c
MoOCl4 n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
Ni(NCS)2 (P(C6 H5 )3 )2
Pd(P(C6 H5 )3 )2 [C CCH2 N(CH3 )2 ]2
Pd(P(C6 H5 )3 )2 (C CCH2 OH)2
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
WCl6 C2 H5 AlCl2
MoCl5 -(C6 H5 )4 Sn
17
39
105
[]=0.08
20
[]=0.063
[]=0.047
4
250
18
16
15
53
71
9
12
44
44
45
46
47
48
48
49
50
50
51
52
52
53
54
55
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
W(CO)6 CCl4 -h
WCl2 (CO)3 (As(C6 H5 )3 )2
W(CO)6 (C6 H5 )2 CCl2 -h
Fe(acac)3 -(C2 H5 )3 Alb
Sm(naphthenate)3 -i-(C4 H9 )3 Al
(cod)Rh(L)PF6 NaOHd
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
Fe(acac)3 -(C2 H5 )3 Alb
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
MoCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
15
77
33
21
4.2
184
8.7
160
39
240
9.2
56
57
37
58,59
60,61
62
63
64
65
65
65
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
[(cod)RhCl]2 d
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
WOCl4
(nbd)Rh+ [(6 -C6 H5 )B (C6 H5 )3 ]c
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
>1000
60 (Mw)
260 (Mw)
15.5
588
19
218
158
65
66
66
67
68
69
38
70
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
122
71
p-CO2 -(-)-menthyl
p-(+)-OCONHCH(CH3 )C6 H5
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
1260
320
72
73
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
[(nbd)RhCl]2 c
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
51
48
>1000
74
75
76
p-Adme
p-OCH3
p-Cl
p-NO2
m-CH NC6 H5
p-I
p-CO2 CH3
Table 1. (Continued)
Monomer
o-CH3
o-CF3
2,5-(CF3 )2
o-Si(CH3 )3
o,o,m,m,p-F5
o,o,m,m,-F4 -p-n-C4 H9
m-N NC6 H5
o-Fc (14) f
p-CH CHFc (15) f
p-N NFc (16) f
p-C CC6 H4 -p-C CFc (17) f
Other aromatic acetylenes [HC CAr]
Ar = 1-Naphthyl
2-Naphthyl
1-Anthryl
2-Anthryl
9-Anthryl
Catalyst
W(CO)6 CCl4 h
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
W(CO)6 CCl4 -h
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
MoCl5 -(C6 H5 )4 Sn
W(CO)6 CCl4 -h
W(CO)6 CCl4 -h
MoCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn-C2 H5 OH
Mo[OCH(CF3 )2 ]2 ( N-Adm) CHC(CH3 )2 C6 H5 (7g)e
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
7j
7j
7j
7j
(3)
WCl6 (C6 H5 )3 Bi
WCl6 /dioxane
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
WCl6
M n , 103
Reference
170
57
260
190
280
[]=0.352
1200
43
14
[]=0.61
110
110
16
19
11
18
78
78
79
80
80
81
82
83
84
85
85
86
87
87
87
88
95
89
46
36
9
37
9
Insoluble
90
91
92
93
93
90
340
97
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
11.7
98
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
Table 1. (Continued)
Monomer
Catalyst
M n , 103
Reference
95.3
99
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C2 H5 )3 Nc
11
100
(cod)Rh(NH3 )Cld
150
101
7j
7j
16.4
16
102
102
MoCl5
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
(OAr)3 Ta[C(CH3 )C(CH3 )CH-t-C4 H9 ](py)g (3)
MoCl5 n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
WCl6
MoCl5 -(C6 H5 )3 SiH
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
1100 (M w )
Insoluble
17.9
510
7.1
71
16
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
[(cod)RhCl]2 d
TaCl5
NbCl5
TaCl5 -(C6 H5 )3 Bi
130
210
1800
110
110
111
CH3
CH3 Si(CH3 )2 C6 H5
CH3 Ge(CH3 )3
TaCl5 -(C6 H5 )3 Bi
TaCl5 -(C6 H5 )4 Sn
TaCl5
TaCl5
80
150
809
Insoluble
112
113
114
115
Cl C6 H5
Cl C6 H4 -p-Adme
C6 H5 C6 H5
C6 H5 C6 H4 -p-Si(CH3 )3
TaCl5
TaCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
MoCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
MoCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
WCl6 (C6 H5 )4 Sn
TaCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
[]=2.70
600
690 (M w )
110
Insoluble
750
C6 H5 C6 H4 -p-Si(C6 H5 )3
TaCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
1900
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
C6 H5
TaCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
>100
124
Table 1. (Continued)
Monomer
10
C6 H5 C6 H4 -p-OC(CF3 ) C[CF(CF3 )2 ]2
C6 H5 C6 H4 -p-C6 H5
C6 H5 C6 H4 -p-N-Carbazolyl
C6 H5 C6 H4 -p-Ge(CH3 )3
C6 H5 C6 H4 -p-t-C4 H9
C6 H5 C6 H4 -p-CH2 C6 H5
C6 H5 C6 H4 -p-Adme
[E] Cyclic acetylenes
Cyclooctyne
= OC6 H3 -o,o-(CH3 )2 .
= acetyleacetonate.
c nbd = bicyclo[2.2.1]hepta-2,5-diene (2,5-norbornadiene).
a dmp
b acac.
= 1,5-cyclooctadiene,
= 1-adamantyl.
f py = pyridine, Ar = o,o-i-(C H ) C H .
3 7 2 6 3
g Ring-opening polymerization.
d cod
e Adm
Catalyst
M n , 103
Reference
TaCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
TaCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
TaCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
TaCl5 -9-BBN
TaCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
TaCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
TaCl5 -n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn
[]=0.87
Insoluble
190
1000
460
350
2200
125
126
127
128
129
126
119
Insoluble
Insoluble
Insoluble
Insoluble
130
131
132
133
Vol. 1
11
Monosubstituted acetylenes generally prefer cyclotrimerization to polymerization in the presence of halides of Group 5 metals as described earlier (135
137). The polymerization of monosubstituted acetylenes by NbCl5 and TaCl5
catalysts is possible only in the case of sterically crowded monomers, which
is exemplied by the polymerization of 3-trialkylsilyl-1-alkynes with the formula of HC CCH(Si(CH3 )2 R)R (R = CH3 , n-C6 H13 , C6 H5 ; R = n-C3 H7 , nC5 H11 , n-C7 H15 ) (45). Even tert-butylacetylene affords a low yield of polymer
in the presence of TaCl5 or NbCl5 . Additionally, the molecular weights of these
Ta- and Nb-based poly(tert-butylacetylene)s are lower than those of the Wbased ones. However, there has been a demonstration of the unique ability of
12
Vol. 1
2,6-dimethylphenoxyo (dmp) complexes of Nb, Nb(dmp)n Cl5 n (dmp = OC6 H3 o,o-CH3 , n = 1 or 2) with cocatalysts such as C2 H5 MgBr or (C2 H5 )3 Al, to polymerize terminal acetylenes such as tert-butylacetylene and phenylacetylene (30,31).
From tert-butylacetylene, extremely high molecular weight polymers are available. Even poly(phenylacetylene) prepared with Nb(dmp)Cl4 t-C4 H9 MgCl possesses relatively high molecular weight (M n = 19,000). Such an exceptional ability
of Nb(dmp)n Cl5 n cocatalyst originates from the presence of bulky aryloxo groups
that have the same effect as bulkiness on the monomer.
Group 6 Transition Metals. This class is most widely employed because
of their high ability to polymerize a wide range of substituted acetylenes (10,23,25,
26). We shall classify Group 6 transition metals into the following four categories:
metal halide catalysts, metal carbonyl catalysts, metal carbene catalysts, and
metal alkylidene catalysts.
Metal Halide Catalysts. MoCl5 and WCl6 , the most convenient Group 6
transition metal catalysts, give high yields of polymers from various monosubstituted acetylenes, especially from bulkily monosubstituted acetylenes. In the case
of sterically not very crowded monomers such as 1-n-alkyne and phenylacetylene, the yields and molecular weights of polymers are unsatisfactory (M n < 1
105 ) because of the unavoidable formation of cyclotrimers (140). In contrast, sterically crowded monomers like tert-butylacetylene and ortho-substituted phenylacetylenes selectively polymerize with MoCl5 and WCl6 to give high molecular
weight polymers. MoCl5 or WCl6 alone are unfortunately inactive for disubstituted
acetylenes.
Appropriate organometallic cocatalysts such as n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn, (C2 H5 )3 SiH,
(C6 H5 )3 Sb, (C6 H5 )3 Bi, and (C6 H5 )4 Sn remarkably activate MoCl5 and WCl6 catalysts and allow the effective polymerization of even disubstituted acetylenes such
as 2-octyne (103) and 1-chloro-1-octyne (106). Living polymerization is also possible by applying this catalyst system (141). For example, in the presence of an
appropriate protic additive (eg, C2 H5 OH, t-C4 H9 OH), MoOCl4 n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn gives
polymers with narrow molecular weight distributions (M w /M n < 1.1) from various
mono- and disubstituted acetylenes (25,27,28).
A systematic study was made on the nature of W-based catalysts,
W(dmp)n Cl6 n cocatalyst (n = 14), in the polymerization of terminal acetylenes
(30,31). The catalytic activity of W(dmp)n Cl6 n is generally lower than that of
WCl6 because the electron-donating phenoxy ligands reduce the Lewis acidity of
the metal. However, these catalysts are characterized by the ease of ne-tuning
of the activity, which can be simply performed by varying the number of ligands. W(dmp)n Cl6 n catalyzes the polymerization of tert-butylacetylene to give
an extremely high molecular weight polymer in the presence of cocatalysts such
as C2 H5 MgBr and (C2 H5 )3 Al. Emphasis should be placed on the fact that the
enhanced bulkiness around W in W(dmp)n Cl6 n enables the polymerization of
n-alkylacetylenes, leading to high molecular weight polymers. This contrasts to
the feature of the WCl6 catalyzed polymerization that generally results in low
molecular weight polymers from the less sterically hindered monomers such as
1-alkynes (M n 104 ). For example, W(dmp)4 Cl2 C2 H5 MgBr transforms 1-octyne
into an elastomer with M n of 350,000, while WCl6 provides yellow viscous oil.
It has been reported that a stable W-based butadiyne complex (3) polymerizes
ortho-substituted phenylacetylenes (142) and monosubstituted arylacetylenes
Vol. 1
13
Metal Carbonyl Catalysts. Mo or W hexacarbonyl alone cause no polymerization of acetylenes. However, upon uv irradiation in halogenated solvents such
as CCl4 , various substituted acetylenes readily polymerize with Mo and W hexacarbonyls (10,23,25,26). Cr(CO)6 as well as other Group 7 metal carbonyls such
as Mn2 (CO)10 and Re2 (CO)10 yield no active species under similar conditions. CCl4 ,
used as a solvent, plays a very important role for the formation of active species,
and therefore, cannot be replaced by toluene, that is often used for metal chloridebased catalysts. Although the activity of metal carbonyl catalysts is low compared
with the metal halide catalysts, they provide extremely high molecular weight
polymers. Another advantage of metal carbonyl catalysts is their stability, which
facilitates the experimental procedure.
An alternative metal carbonyl catalyst, (Mes)Mo(CO)3 (Mes = mesitylene),
also catalyzes the polymerization of substituted acetylenes in CCl4 (143). Photoirradiation is unnecessary for this system; the ligating mesitylene is readily released
by heating, which allows the polymerization to proceed without photoirradiation.
In a similar way, photoirradiation can be omitted by using (CH3 CN)3 M(CO)3 as a
catalyst (144).
The use of (C6 H5 )2 CCl2 enables the omission of CCl4 in the metal-carbonyl
catalyzed polymerization of acetylenes. For example, the polymerization of phenylacetylene with W(CO)6 in the presence of (C6 H5 )2 CCl2 in toluene proceeds homogeneously and gives a polymer with M n of 17,000 in 68% yield upon photoirradiation (58,59). Very high molecular weight polymers (M w > 105 ) are attainable from
sterically bulky aromatic and aliphatic acetylenes. An alternative metal carbonyl
catalyst, MCl2 (CO)3 [As(C6 H5 )3 ] (M = Mo, W), that catalyzes the ring-opening polymerization of norbornenes has been shown to polymerize tert-butylacetylene and
ortho-substituted phenylacetylenes without photoirradiation or the use of CCl4
(37).
Metal Carbene Catalysts. The rst use of isolated single-component carbene catalysts showed that the Fischer (4) and Casey carbenes (5) polymerize
phenylacetylene, tert-butylacetylene, and cyclooctyne in low yields (130). For example, the bulk polymerization of tert-butylacetylene with (4) gives a high molecular weight (M n = 260,000) polymer in 28% yield. Polymer-supported Fischer
carbene (4) is also active for the polymerization of phenylacetylene under photoirradiation (145). As a catalyst, the Casey carbene (5) is less stable but more active
than the Fischer carbene (130). The Rudler carbene (6) readily releases the intramolecularly ligated double bond upon the approach of an acetylenic monomer.
Thus, it is more active than the Fischer and Casey carbenes (146148). These
carbene complexes are, however, unable to control the polymerization.
14
Vol. 1
Vol. 1
15
Reference
60
(29,63,155,156)
(29,47,64,157160)
161
162
162
163
Catalyst
[(cod)Rh(SC6 F5 )]2
(cod)Rh(SO3 C6 H4 -p-CH3 )(H2 O)
[(nbd)Rh(acac)]2
(nbd)Rh+ [(6 -C6 H5 )B (C6 H5 )3 ]
(nbd)C6 H5 C CRh(P(C6 H5 )3 )2 (9)
[(nbd)RhOCH3 ]2 P(C6 H5 )3
[(nbd)RhCl]2 (C6 H5 )2 C C(C6 H5 )LiP(C6 H5 )3
(nbd)(C6 H5 )2 C C(C6 H5 )Rh(P(C6 H5 )3 )2 (10)
Reference
164,165
166
167
38
168170171
172
173
174
16
(63,155,156)
175
Vol. 1
17
18
Vol. 1
difference between the monomer and polymer. Namely, highly strained cyclooctyne readily polymerizes with Pd and Ni catalysts including PdCl2 , Pd2 (dba)3 ,
Pd(CH3 CN)2 (OTs)2 , Ni(cod)2 , and so forth (133).
Ionic Catalysts. Preparation of polyacetylenes having satisfactory molecular weights is impossible by ionic processes. For example, anionic polymerization of phenylacetylene is claimed to be accompanied by the electron transfer
from the active center to the conjugated chain, which causes the formation of low molecular weight oligomers (177). Attempts to ionically polymerize acetylene derivatives have been made using zwitterionic monomers such
as N-methyl-2-ethynylpyridinium salts (178180) and phosphonium acetylenes
(C6 H5 C C+ P(C6 H5 )3 Br ) (181). The degree of polymerization is generally below
25. However, the ability of these monomers to anionically polymerize offers block
copolymers with common vinyl monomers such as styrene, which would provide
a new route to functional materials. Relatively high molecular weight polymers
(10,000) can be obtained by the tert-C4 H9 OK-initiated proton transfer polymerization of acetyleneamides (182). Much higher reactivity of acetyleneamides than
that of acrylamides allows one to conduct the polymerization under the mild conditions to give formally alternating copolymers of acetylene with isocyanates.
Precision Polymerization
In these two decades remarkable progress has been made in the development of
excellent catalysts for living and stereospecic acetylene polymerizations (10,26
28). The -conjugated polymers prepared by the sequential polymerization are
strictly limited to polyacetylenes, except for only a few examples. Thus, synthesis
of tailor-made conjugated macromolecules such as end-functionalized polymers,
block copolymers, star-shaped polymers is possible only in the case of substituted
acetylenes.
General. As stated in the preceding section, diverse transition metals
from Group 3 to Group 10 elements initiate the polymerization of substituted
acetylenes. Catalysts that achieve living polymerization, however, are quite limited, which contrasts to a wide variety of living polymerization catalysts for vinyl
monomers. The catalysts are classied into the following groups: (1) metal halide
catalysts, (2) metal carbenes, and (3) Rh complexes. As described later, attention should be paid on the fact that the structure of monomers undergoing living
polymerization signicantly depends on the type of catalyst. Thus, appropriate
catalysts must be selected in order to synthesize well-dened polymers from the
individual monomer.
Living Polymerization by Metal Halide Catalysts. Metal halide-based
living polymerization catalysts possess a general formula of MOn Clm cocatalyst
ROH (M = Mo or W, n = 0 or 1, m = 5 or 4) (10,2528). The most striking feature
of these catalysts is the ease in preparation. One can readily generate these catalysts in situ just by mixing these three components. The living polymerization
of substituted acetylenes has been achieved, for the rst time, by using a Mobased multicomponent catalyst. The ability of a protic additive, ethanol, to control
the polymerization of 1-chloro-1-octyne with MoCl5 n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn in toluene has
been demonstrated (141). Poly(1-chloro-1-octyne) with narrow molecular weight
Vol. 1
19
20
Vol. 1
homo- and copolymers. On the other hand, with MoOCl4 n-(C4 H9 )4 SnC2 H5 OH,
block copolymers with narrow molecular weight distributions selectively form
from various substituted acetylenes even if the order of monomer addition is
changed (197).
Tungsten-based
multicomponent
catalysts,
WOCl4 n-(C4 H9 )4 SntC4 H9 OH, WOCl4 n-C4 H9 Li, and WOCl4 C2 H5 MgBr, have been proven to
achieve controlled polymerizations of o-triuoromethylphenylacetylene, otrimethylsilylphenylacetylene, HC CC6 F4 -p-n-C4 H9 , 3-decyne, and 5-dodecyne
(198,199). On the other hand, analogous combinations of WCl6 with cocatalysts
are ineffective for living polymerization of these monomers.
NbCl5 has been reported to polymerize 1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne in nonpolar solvents such as cyclohexane, giving a polymer with low polydispersity (200).
The molecular weight of this polymer increases in proportion to the monomer
conversion. Either the replacement of NbCl5 by TaCl5 or the use of other solvents
disrupts the living nature of the polymerization.
After the work with W-based catalysts, Mo carbene catalysts (7ad) were
synthesized (Table 3) and have been proven to elegantly induce living cyclopolymerization of 1,6-heptadiynes (150,151). Mo carbenes ligated by bulky imido and
alkoxy groups are quite effective. Because there is no signicant difference between the propagation and initiation rates, the resultant polymers show relatively broad molecular weight distributions (1.25). However, these catalysts are
able to quantitatively initiate the polymerization, which allows an easy control
of the molecular weights simply by adjusting the monomerinitiator ratio. It is
important to use appropriate solvent (DME) for selective cyclopolymerization; the
polymerizations can be run in other solvents but give insoluble networked polymers. Bisinitiation of 1,6-heptadiynes is feasible if bifunctional initiator (8) is
used (151). The ability of these Mo carbenes to tolerate polar functional groups
Vol. 1
21
Table 3. Mo-Based Carbene Catalysts ((7)) for the Living Polymerization of Substituted
Acetylenes
(7)
R1
R2
R3
R4
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
7i
7j
C6 H3 -2,6-i-(C3 H7 )2
C6 H3 -2,6-i-(C3 H7 )2
1-Adm
C6 H3 -2-t-C4 H9
C6 H3 -2-t-C4 H9
C6 H3 -2-t-C4 H9
1-Adm
1-Adm
1-Adm
C6 H3 -2,6-(CH3 )2
OC(CH3 )(CF3 )2
OC(CF3 )3
OC(CH3 )(CF3 )2
OC(CH3 )(CF3 )2
O2 C(C6 H5 )3
O2 C(C6 H5 )3
OCH(CF3 )2
OCH(CF3 )2
OCH(CF3 )2
OC(CH3 )(CF3 )2
C(CH3 )2 C6 H5
C(CH3 )2 C6 H5
C(CH3 )2 C6 H5
C(CH3 )3
C(CH3 )3
C(CH3 )2 C6 H5
C(CH3 )2 C6 H5
C6 H5
C6 H5
C(CH3 )2 C6 H5
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
CH3
C6 H5
H
permits living polymerization of functionalized monomers containing ester, sulfonic ester, and siloxy groups (151). Even a hydroxy group-containing monomer
quantitatively provides a polymer. End-capping of the polymers is readily accomplished using aromatic aldehydes including p-N,N-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde
and p-cyanobenzaldehyde. Cyclopolymerization of 1,6-heptadiynes with carbenes
(7ad) offers polymers having both ve- and six-membered cyclic structures. In
contrast, carbenes (7e) and (7f), which have bulky carboxylate ligands produce
polymers bearing only six-membered rings (152).
Ring-substituted phenylacetylenes have been applied to the Mo carbeneinitiated polymerization, leading to a nding that well-dened polymers are readily obtained with (7gi) ligated by less bulky alkoxy groups (84,149). Unless an
appropriate base is added, isolation of (7gi) cannot be accomplished because of
their instability. Like metal halide-induced living polymerizations, bulky ring substituents at the ortho position are required for controlled polymerization. The most
characteristic point of these polymerization systems is that all the steps including initiation and propagation can be readily monitored by an nmr technique. For
example, the detailed studies on the initiation step for various ring-substituted
phenylacetylenes have revealed that the alkylidene groups of (7) selectively undergo -addition onto o-trimethylsilylphenylacetylene. On the other hand, the
selectivity of -addition decreases with the decrease in the bulkiness of ortho substituents. Thus, the polymer main chain has both head-to-tail and head-to-head
structures in the case of phenylacetylenes with small ortho substituents.
Metal-containing monomers, ferrocenylacetylene (12) and ruthenocenylacetylene (13) have been subjected to living polymerization with (7j) that has
bulky alkoxide ligands (102). Living polymers are inaccessible with (7gi) that
suit ortho-substituted phenylacetylenes. Because of the insolubility of these polymers, the polymerization degree must be restricted below ca 40 in order to produce
the soluble polymers. Similar metallocene-containing monomers, HC CC6 H4 -o-Fc
(14), HC CC6 H4 -p-CH=CHFc (15), HC CC6 H4 -p-N=NFc (16), and HC CC6 H4 p-C CC6 H4 -p-C CFc (17), polymerize in a living manner in the presence of (7)
(87,88). The use of (7j) leads to successful formation of high molecular weight polymers (104 ) from terminal aliphatic acetylenes (202). Because the chain propagation is faster than initiation, narrow molecular weight distribution is not attained.
22
Vol. 1
Vol. 1
23
24
Vol. 1
isomerization and eventually inuences the cis content of the polymer. The isomerization can be retarded by conducting the polymerization at low temperature
or in poor solvents such as dichloromethane or anisole.
Functional Polyacetylenes
Thanks to the tremendous progress in the transition metal-catalyzed polymerization of substituted acetylenes as described in the previous sections, it is now
possible to access various acetylene-based polymers having desired rst-order
structures. This, in combination with highly advanced organic synthetic technology, provides novel functional materials based on polyacetylenes, and the following surveys examples of the design and synthesis of functional substituted
polyacetylenes.
Permeable Polyacetylenes. Application of substituted polyacetylenes as
gas-permeable materials has been most intensively studied (206213). These studies are motivated by the extremely high gas permeability of poly(1-trimethylsilyl1-propyne) (18) (214). which is the most permeable material among the polymers
available. Its oxygen permeability (PO2 = 12 mmol/(msGPa), 30006000 barrers) is about 10 times larger than that of poly(dimethylsiloxane). In addition
to its high permeability, the ability of (18) to give a free-standing lm has attracted many membrane scientists. Poly(diphenylacetylenes) also exhibit large
values for gas permeability (213). They are thermally very stable (T 0 > 500 C)
and possess lm-forming ability. The ease in modifying ring substituents provides
an opportunity to tune the permeability as well as the solubility and second-order
conformation. Table 4 lists examples of the substituted polyacetylenes having
high gas permeability. The permeability of poly(diphenylacetylenes) signicantly
depends on the shape of ring substituents. Generally, those with bulky ring substituents such as tert-butyl, trimethylsilyl, and trimethylgermyl groups exhibit
very large PO2 values, up to 0.370.40 mmol/ (msGPa) (11001200 barrers),
which is about a quarter of that of (18) and approximately twice as large as that of
poly(dimethylsiloxane). Poly(phenylacetylenes) tend to show lower permeability
than poly(diphenylacetylenes).
Liquid crystalline Polyacetylenes. Several kinds of polyacetylenes with
liquid-crystalline moiety in the side groups have been prepared with the motivation of improving main-chain orientation and effective conjugation through
the alignment of the pendant mesogens. The polymer skeleton of poly(1-alkynes)
shows liquid crystallinity, whereas poly(phenylacetylene)- based polymers exhibit
poorer mesomorphism because of their high rigidity of the polymer backbone (71).
Poly(1-alkynes) with phenylcyclohexyl mesogenic cores separated from the main
chain by an alkylene spacer (19) have been synthesized (40,224). These polymers
prepared with Fe and Mo catalysts show smectic A phase upon heating. Mo-based
polymers show higher transition temperatures compared to the Fe-based polymers. X-ray diffraction (xrd) measurements indicate that these polymers adopt
layered structures in the liquid crystalline state where the mesogenic side chains
locate at both sides of the main chain (225). The main chain of the polymers has
been claimed to comprise the head-headtail-tail linkage from the xrd data. Novel
photo-responsive liquid crystalline polyacetylenes (20) that have azobenzenes as
Vol. 1
25
Table 4. Oxygen Permeability Coefcients (PO2 ) and PO2 /PN2 of Highly Permeable
Substituted Polyacetylenes
Po2
mmol/(msGPa)
barrera
Po2 /PN2 ,
Reference
n-C3 H7
(CH2 )3 Si(CH3 )3
C6 H4 -p-Si(CH3 )3
C6 H4 -m-Si(CH3 )3
C6 H4 -p-Si(CH3 )3
C6 H4 -p-Si(CH3 )2 -i-C3 H7
C6 H4 -m-Si(CH3 )2 -t-C4 H9
2.0
0.29
0.21
0.32
0.17
0.15
0.15
0.033
0.60
0.93
0.90
0.043
0.080
0.40
0.37
0.067
0.037
6100
860
640
970
500
440
460
100
1800
2800
2700
130
240
1200
1100
200
110
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.0
2.2
2.1
2.7
2.8
1.5
2.0
2.4
2.4
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.5
214
113
215
215,216
217
215
215,216
217
115
114
218
215
215,216
121,122
121,122
219
219
C6 H4 -m-Ge(CH3 )3
C6 H4 -p-t-C4 H9
C6 H4 -p-n-C4 H9
C6 H4 -p-Si(CH3 )3
C6 H3 -o,p-(Si(CH3 )3 )2
C6 H3 -o-Ge(CH3 )3
C6 H2 -2,4,5-(CF3 )3
C6 H3 -2,5-(CF3 )3
t-C4 H9
0.073
0.37
0.37
0.033
0.057
0.16
0.037
0.26
0.15
0.043
200
1100
1100
100
170
470
110
780
450
130
1.1
2.0
2.2
1.7
2.7
2.7
2.0
2.1
2.3
3.0
124
128
129
129
220
220
221
222
222
223
R1
R2
CH3
CH3
Si(CH3 )3 (18)
Si(C2 H5 )3
CH3
Si(CH3 )2 C2 H5
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
Si(CH3 )(C2 H5 )2
Si(CH3 )2 -i-C3 H7
Si(CH3 )2 -n-C3 H7
Ge(CH3 )3
CH3
CH3
CH3
C6 H5
C6 H5
C6 H5
C6 H5
C6 H5
C6 H5
C6 H5
C6 H5
H
H
H
H
H
H
a1
mesogens have also been prepared (41,226). Thermally induced transitions from
glassy to smectic and isotopic phases take place at 38 and 87 C, respectively.
Polymer (20) undergoes reversible photochemical trans-to-cis and cis-to-trans isomerizations.
26
Vol. 1
the main chain by long alkylene spacers (70). The cyano functionality does not
deactivate the Mo- and W-based metathesis catalysts, and good yields of the polymers are obtained. All polymers (21) are mesomorphic, which was supported by
the differential scanning calorimetry, polarizing optical microscopy, and x-ray
diffraction analyses. The presence of a longer spacer favors better ordering of
the mesogenic cores. These polymers adopt various morphologies, eg, monotropic
nematicity, enantiotropic nematicity, and enantiotropic smecticity, depending on
the length of the alkylene spacer.
Polyacetylenes with Nonlinear Optical Properties. Substituted polyacetylenes are conjugated polymers; however, the repulsion between pendant
Vol. 1
27
groups causes the twist of the main chain to reduce the degree of conjugation.
Thus, many of substituted polyacetylenes show quite low unpaired-electron densities, which results in their poorer electrical conductivity (10,2224,26). The mainchain conjugation can be improved by introducing ortho-substituents to monosubstituted arylacetylenes. For example, poly(phenylacetylenes) ortho-substituted
by trimethylsilyl, trimethylgermyl, and triuoromethyl groups are deeply colored and show large third-order nonlinear optical susceptibilities (228,229)
(Table 5). Arylacetylenes bearing condensed aromatic rings such as naphthalene, anthracene, phenanthrene, and pyrene also belong to this category (52,90
95). Monomers designed so as to increase steric repulsion between the pendant
groups and the main chain of the formed polymers give polymers having extremely
expanded main-chain conjugation in the presence of W catalysts (94). Hence,
9-phenanthrylacetylene, 9-anthrylacetylene, and 1-pyrenylacetylene give deeply
colored polymers in good yields with WCl6 n-(C4 H9 )4 Sn. They show the absorption maxima around 600 nm, and the cut off wavelengths reach 800 nm. On the
other hand, the less conjugated polymers are formed from 2-anthrylacetylene and
2-phenanthrylacetylene. Among the polymers from monosubstituted acetylenes,
the polymer from 10-hexoxycarbonyl-9-anthrylacetylene (24) exhibits the largest
third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility (230) (Table 5). Although the homopolymer of 9-anthrylacetylene obtained with W catalyst is insoluble (90), (24)
is a soluble dark-purple polymer having an absorption maximum at 580 nm.
The electric conductivity of I2 -doped (24) is 8.77 10 4 S/cm at 293 K. NCarbazolylacetylene also polymerizes with W catalysts, giving a polymer with
high degree of main-chain conjugation (95).
Luminescent Substituted Polyacetylenes. The luminescent property
of conjugated polymers is one of the most important functions, and an energetic
study of the photo- and electroluminescence of substituted polyacetylenes has
been made (231245). Polymers that show intense luminescence are those from
diphenylacetylenes and 1-phenyl-1-alkynes, and so on. Only weak red emissions
are observed from monosubstituted arylacetylene polymers (234,240). A systematic investigation on the luminescence of these kinds of polymers found that
poly(diphenylacetylenes) exhibit photoluminescence around 530 nm and electroluminescence around 550 nm (232,242). In a similar way, poly(1-phenyl-1-alkynes)
photochemically and electrochemically emit strong lights with spectral maxima located around 455 and 470 nm, respectively. Green and blue emissions are observed
from the electroluminescent devices using poly(diphenylacetylenes) and poly(1phenyl-1-alkynes) as the emission layers, respectively (235,236,240,242,243). The
Stokes shift of photoluminescence of these polymers is quite large: 0.3 eV for
poly(diphenylacetylenes) and 0.6 eV for poly(1-phenyl-1-alkynes). This series of
studies varying the substituents on the polymers have revealed the following
tendencies: (1) the introduction of bulky or long alkyl pendant groups enhances
the efciencies of the luminescence of poly(diphenylacetylenes) (235,242), and
(2) the emission peaks blue-shift with the length of the alkyl pendant of poly(1phenyl-1-alkynes) (234). Interestingly, both photo- and electroluminescences of the
blend of blue emissive poly(1-phenyl-1-octyne) and green emissive poly(1-phenyl2-p-n-butylphenylacetylene) vary between green and blue, which is dependent
on the ratio of the two polymers (234,237). This result means that the emission
28
Vol. 1
Polymer
cis-rich
0.36
THG
1907
228
0.54
12
THG
THG
1907
1907
229
228
520
40
THG
1907
90
550
18
THG
1907
95
571
190
EA
631
230
439
3.0
THG
1907
229
536
17
THG
1907
229
548
26
THG
1907
229
28
EA
631
229
trans-rich 352
510
a THG:
Vol. 1
29
wavelength with desired color between blue and green can be obtained by controlling the mole ratio of these two polymers.
30
Vol. 1
conditions, polymers with a very high spin concentration are available. Paramagnetic metalloporphyrins have been incorporated into poly(phenylacetylene) with
the motivation of producing magnetically interacting polymers (38) (255). Unfortunately, no ferromagnetic interactions have been achieved because of the torsion
in the polyene backbone. The twist of the main chain, caused by the steric repulsion between the pendants, inhibits the extended conjugative spin coupling
through the alternating double bonds in the main chain.
Optically Active Substituted Polyacetylenes. The repulsion between
the pendants in substituted polyacetylenes twists the main chain, which discourages the studies on the synthesis of acetylene-based polymer magnets. Recently,
this main-chain torsion has been extensively applied to the synthesis of chiral
Vol. 1
31
polymers having well-ordered helical conformations, which has expanded the potential utility of substituted acetylenes as the enantioselective permeable materials, polarization-sensitive electrooptical materials, asymmetric electrodes, and
so on.
Helical Poly(1-alkynes). The rst report of the synthesis of chiral substituted polyacetylenes involved the polymerization of terminal aliphatic acetylenes
having a chiral pendant (39) with Fe(acac)3 in the presence of trialkylaluminum
(39). Relatively weak but clear Cotton effects appear in the electric absorption
range of the main chain, suggesting the helical conformation of the polymers. The
distance between the chiral carbon and the main chain remarkably inuences the
chiroptical properties of the polymers, and the intensity as well as the shape of the
Cotton effects considerably changes with the variation of the number of methylene
spacers between the chirogenic carbon and the main chain. A decrease in temperature results in the drastic enhancement of the Cotton effect, which indicates the
short persistence length of the helical domain. Monomer (40) was polymerized
with a cationic Rh catalyst, (nbd)Rh+ [( 6 C6 H5 )B (C6 H5 )3 ], to give a polymer
displaying very intense Cotton effects (38). Thus, the increase in the bulkiness at
the -carbon is likely to advantageously induce helicity to the backbone.
Helical Poly(phenylacetylenes). The most widely studied helicalsubstituted polyacetylenes are based on poly(phenylacetylene) with chiral ring
substituents. Polymerization of chiral phenylacetylenes was rst reported in
1995 (72). 4-()-Menthoxycarbonylphenylacetylene (41) was subjected to the
polymerization with several transition metal catalysts such as [(nbd)RhCl]2 and
WCl6 . The resultant Rh-based polymer shows a large optical rotation and intense
CD effects in the electric absorption region of the main chain. The polymer,
thus, exists in a helical conformation with an excess of one-handed screw-sense.
Poly(phenylacetylene) with small chiral pendants, poly(42), in contrast, displays
poorer chiroptical properties. Interestingly, an increase in temperature steeply
increases the optical rotation of poly(41) if the polymer is produced with a W
catalyst. Such a drastic enhancement of chiroptical properties is not observed in
the case of Rh-based poly(41).
32
Vol. 1
W-based poly(43), shows no distinct CD effects. High stereoregularity (cis) is, thus,
required for the construction of well-ordered helical structures. The molecular
recognition ability was demonstrated by the chromatographic enantioseparation
of various racemates using poly(43) as a chiral stationary phase.
Vol. 1
33
characteristic point of this process is that the helix sense, determined by the priory complexed chiral amines, is maintained even after complete substitution by
achiral aminoalcohols. In other words, the memory of macromolecular helicity is
possible.
Helical Poly(propiolic esters). Comprehensive studies of the helical nature
of poly(propiolic esters) (45) have shown that, apart from the exibility of the main
chain of polymers from poly(1-alkynes) and poly(phenylacetylenes), poly(propiolic
esters) possess a stiff main chain (50,261,262). The MarkHouwinkSakurada
plots of the stereoregular (cis-transoidal) poly(propiolic esters) clearly indicate the
stiff main chain of poly(propiolic esters) (262). For example, the slope of the Mark
HouwinkSakurada plot of poly(hexyl propiolate) is 1.2, which is comparable to
that of poly(hexyl isocyanate). The stiffness of poly(propiolic esters) originates
from the helical conformation with a large helical domain size. In contrast to
other substituted polyacetylenes, a clearer cooperative effect of helical structure
is observed in the chiral/achiral and the R/S copolymerizations (262). Therefore,
only a small amount of chiral substituents in the pendant groups leads to wellordered helical poly(propiolic esters) with an excess of one-handed screw sense.
The most important factor to affect the secondary conformation of poly(propiolic
esters) is the structure of pendants, and an introduction of methylene groups at
the -position of the ester group is indispensable for the construction of wellordered helical polymers (261). For the polymers having -methylene groups (44),
n = 15), remote control of the screw sense is possible if the chiral information
positions within the -carbon from the ester group. Temperature variable CD
spectra also suggest that, if the chiral carbon locates within the -position, one
screw sense dominates over the counterpart even at room temperature. When
the chiral substituent on the ester group is a long alkyl chain such as (S)-3,7dimethyloctyl group, helix sense inversion takes place, which is driven by the
change of temperature or solvent composition (77).
A simple NMR technique can estimate not only the activation energy of helix
helix interconversion (G), but also the free energy difference between the rightand left-handed conformations (Gr ) (262). In the NMR spectra of poly(propiolic
esters) without -branching, -methylene protons give two diastereotopic signals.
This peak separation is contributed by the slow interconversion process between
34
Vol. 1
the right- and left-handed helical conformations. Thus, the temperature variable
NMR measurements readily give the activation energy G for the helixhelix
interconversion (7179 kJ/mol, 1719 kcal/mol), which is comparable to that of
polyisocyanates. This means that poly(propiolic esters) undergo rapid helix inversion at ambient temperature. The Gr of poly(hexyl propiolate) was also estimated
by NMR to be 6.65 kJ/mol (1.59 kcal/mol) at 22 C.
Helical Polymers from Disubstituted Acetylenes. In contrast to the energetic studies on the helical polymers from monosubstituted acetylenes, those
from disubstituted acetylenes are very limited. One of the reasons is the difculty
in controlling and elucidating the stereoregularity of the polymers from disubstituted acetylenes. However, in contrast to the instability of polymers from monosubstituted acetylenes (263269), those from disubstituted acetylenes are quite
stable. Another advantage of polymers from disubstituted acetylenes is their excellent permeability to small molecules. Thus, chiral polymers from disubstituted
acetylenes are potentially applicable to the chiral resolution membranes.
The rst example of chiral polymer from a disubstituted acetylene is a poly(1trimethylsilyl-1-propyne)-based polymer, poly(46), which was synthesized in moderate yields using TaCl5 Ph3 Bi (112). Poly(46) displays small optical rotations,
and its molar ellipticities of the Cotton effects are up to a few hundreds. The main
chain of poly(46) is, therefore, not a well-ordered helix. This is probably because of
the less controlled geometrical structure (cis and trans) of the polymer backbone.
However, the free-standing lm of this polymer achieves an enantioselective permeation of various racemates including alcohols and amino acids. For example, the
concentration-driven permeation of an aqueous solution of tryptophan by poly(46)
gives 81% enantiomeric excess (ee) of the permeate at the initial stage. A characteristic of the membrane of poly(46) is its ability to enantioselectively recognize
2-butanol and 1,3-butanediol, because the direct resolution of these racemates by
hplc is impossible.
Other chiral polymers from disubstituted acetylenes are based on the
poly(phenylacetylene) derivatives that are also recognized as one of the most
permeable polymers. Diphenylacetylene having a dimethyl-()-pinanylsilyl group
(47a) was polymerized with Ta and Nb catalyst to give an extremely high molecular weight polymer in good yield (124). The produced polymer exhibits a very
large optical rotation ([]D > 2000 ), and complicated but very intense CD effects appear in its absorption region. Although the rst order structure (cis or
trans, head-to-head or head-to-tail) of the polymer is unknown, these very rich
chiroptical properties are indicative of the main-chain chirality based on helical
structure. Similar polymers from disubstituted acetylenes (47b) and (47c) have
been obtained; however, their chiroptical properties are poorer in comparison with
those of poly(47a).
Vol. 1
35
Although poly(47a) exhibits large chiroptical properties, its ability to enantioselectively permeate racemates is unexpectedly low. In contrast, poly(47b) that
possesses small []D and [ ] values achieves the resolution of racemic mixtures of
tryptophan. The initial % ee of permeate reached 52%. Thus, the size of the void
in the membrane of helical poly(47a) appears to be very large, which may inhibit
the racemate to interact with the chiral environment originating from the chiral
pendant.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Acetylene and Acetylenic Polymers in EPST 1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 4666, by E. M. Smolin,
Diamond Alkali Co., and D. S. Hoffenberg, Gaylord Associates, Inc.; Acetylenic Polymers in
EPSE 2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 87130, by H. W. Gibson, Xerox Corp, and J. M. Pochan, Eastman
Kodak Co.
1. G. Natta, G. Mazzanti, and P. Corradini, Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei, Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat.
Nat., Rend. 25, 3 (1958).
2. H. Shirakawa and co-workers, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 578 (1977).
3. C. K. Chiang and co-workers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1098 (1977).
4. C. K. Chiang and co-workers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 1013 (1978).
5. H. Naarman, Synth. Met. 17, 223 (1987).
6. J. Tsukamoto, A. Takahashi, and K. Kawasaki, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29, 125 (1990).
7. T. Ito, H. Shirakawa, and S. Ikeda, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed. 12, 11 (1974).
8. H. Shirakawa and S. Ikeda, Polym. J. 2, 231 (1971).
9. T. Masuda, K. Hasegawa, and T. Higashimura, Macromolecules 7, 728 (1974).
10. H. Shirakawa, T. Masuda, and K. Takeda, in S. Patai, ed., The Chemistry of TripleBonded Functional Groups, Suppl. C2, Vol. 2, Wiley, Chichester, 1994, Chapt. 17.
11. A. M. Saxman, R. Liepens, and M. Aldissi, Prog. Polym. Sci. 11, 57 (1985).
12. J. C. W. Chien, Polyacetylene, Academic Press, New York, 1984.
13. T. A. Skotheim, ed., Handbook of Conducting Polymers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New
York, 1986.
14. S. Curran, A. Star-Hauser, and S. Roth, in H. S. Nalwa, ed., Handbook of Organic
Conductive Molecules and Polymers, Vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, 1997,
Chapt. 1.
15. J. Tsibouklis, Adv. Mater. 7, 407 (1995).
16. T. Ogawa, Prog. Polym. Sci. 20, 943 (1995).
17. J. Shinar, in H. S. Nalwa, ed., Handbook of Organic Conductive Molecules and Polymers, Vol. 3, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Chichester, 1997, Chapt. 7.
18. F. Mohammad, in Ref. 17, Chapt. 16.
19. T. Kobayashi, in Ref. 17, Vol. 4, Chapt. 7.
20. S.-K. Choi and co-workers, Prog. Polym. Sci. 22, 693 (1997).
21. S.-K. Choi and co-workers, Chem. Rev. 100, 1645 (2000).
22. G. Costa, in G. Allen, ed., Comprehensive Polymer Science, Vol. 4, Pergamon Press,
Oxford, 1989, Chapt. 9.
23. T. Masuda and T. Higashimura, Adv. Polym. Sci. 81, 121 (1986).
24. C. I. Simonescu and V. Percec, Prog. Polym. Sci. 8, 133 (1982).
25. T. Masuda, in S. Kobayashi, ed., Catalysis in Precision Polymerization, John Wiley &
Sons, Inc., Chichester, 1997, Chapt. 2.4.
26. T. Masuda, in J. C. Salamone, ed., Polymeric Material Encyclopedia, Vol. 1, CRC Press,
Boca Raton Fla., 1996, p. 32.
27. T. Masuda and co-workers, J. Mol. Catal. 133, 213 (1998).
36
Vol. 1
28. T. Masuda and co-workers, J. Macromol. Sci., A: Pure Appl. Chem. 34, 1977 (1997).
29. M. Tabata, T. Sone, and Y. Sadahiro, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 200, 265 (1999).
30. Y. Nakayama, K. Mashima, and A. Nakamura, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1496
(1992).
31. Y. Nakayama, K. Mashima, and A. Nakamura, Macromolecules 26, 6267 (1993).
32. Z. Shen and M. F. Farona, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 22, 1009 (1984).
33. Z. Shen and M. F. Farona, Polym. Bull. 10, 298 (1983).
34. T. Masuda and co-workers, Polym. J. 14, 371 (1982).
35. T. Masuda and co-workers, Polym. J. 12, 907 (1980).
36. M. Nakano, T. Masuda, and T. Higashimura, Macromolecules 27, 1344 (1994).
37. H. Nakako and co-workers, Polym. J. 30, 577 (1998).
38. Y. Kishimoto and co-workers, Macromolecules 28, 6662 (1995).
39. F. Ciardelli, S. Lanzillo, and O. Pieroni, Macromolecules 7, 174 (1974).
40. S. Oh and co-workers, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 31, 2977 (1993).
41. H. Goto, K. Akagi, and H. Shirakawa, Synth. Met. 84, 373 (1997).
42. B. Z. Tang and co-workers, Macromolecules 31, 2419 (1998).
43. S. Koltzenburg, F. Stelzer, and O. Nuyken, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 200, 821 (1999).
44. H. Tajima, T. Masuda, and T. Higashimura, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 25,
2033 (1987).
45. T. Masuda and co-workers, Macromolecules 20, 1467 (1987).
46. K. Tsuchihara, T. Masuda, and T. Higashimura, Polym. Bull. 20, 343 (1988).
47. M. Tabata and co-workers, J. Macromol. Sci., A: Pure Appl. Chem. 31, 465 (1994).
48. T. Masuda, M. Kawai, and T. Higashimura, Polymer 23, 744 (1982).
49. I. Yamaguchi, K. Osakada, and T. Yamamoto, Inorg. Chim. Acta 220, 35 (1994).
50. H. Nakako and co-workers, Macromolecules 32, 2861 (1999).
51. M. V. Russo and co-workers, Polymer 36, 4867 (1995).
52. M. V. Russo and co-workers, Polymer 38, 3677 (1997).
53. T. Sata, R. Nomura, and T. Masuda, Polym. Bull. 41, 395 (1998).
54. Y.-S. Gal and co-workers, Macromolecules 28, 2086 (1995).
55. Y.-S. Gal, Eur. Polym. J. 33, 169 (1997).
56. T. Masuda and co-workers, Macromoleucles 9, 661 (1976).
57. T. Masuda and co-workers, Polym. Bull. 2, 823 (1980).
58. Y. Misumi and co-workers, Polym. J. 30, 581 (1998).
59. Y. Tamura, Y. Misumi, and T. Masuda, Chem. Commun. 373 (1996).
60. R. J. Kern, J. Polym. Sci., Part A1 7, 621 (1969).
61. B. Biyani and co-workers, J. Macromol. Sci., Part A: Chem. 9, 327 (1975).
62. Z. Shen and M. F. Farona, Polym. Bull. 10, 8 (1983).
63. A. Furlani, S. Licoccia, and M. V. Russo, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 24, 991
(1986).
64. W. Yang and co-workers, Polym. J. 23, 1135 (1991).
65. Y. Fujita and co-workers, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 36, 3157 (1998).
66. M. Tabata, Y. Wu, and K. Yokotoa, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 32, 1113 (1994).
67. M. V. Russo, A. Furlani, and R. Damato, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 36, 93
(1998).
68. A. M. A. Karim, R. Nomura, and T. Masuda, Polym. Bull. 43, 305 (1999).
69. J. Vohldal and co-workers, Polymer 38, 3359 (1997).
70. B. Z. Tang and co-workers, Macromolecules 30, 5620 (1998).
71. X. Kong, J. W. Y. Lam, and B. Z. Tang, Macromolecules 32, 1722 (1999).
72. T. Aoki and co-workers, Chem. Lett. 2009 (1993).
73. E. Yashima, S. Huang, and Y. Okamoto, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1811 (1994).
74. E. Yashima and co-workers, Macromolecules 28, 4184 (1995).
75. E. Yashima, Y. Maeda, and Y. Okamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 8895 (1998).
Vol. 1
37
38
125.
126.
127.
128.
129.
130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
135.
136.
137.
138.
139.
140.
141.
142.
143.
144.
145.
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
151.
152.
153.
154.
155.
156.
157.
158.
159.
160.
161.
162.
163.
164.
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
170.
Vol. 1
G. Dandliker,
Helv. Chem. Acta 52, 1482 (1969).
T. Masuda, T. Takahashi, and T. Higashimura, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1297
(1982).
F. A. Cotton and co-workers, Macromolecules 14, 233 (1981).
J. Kunzler and V. Percec, Polym. Bull. 29, 335 (1992).
T. Masuda and co-workers, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1805 (1987).
M. Yamaguchi and co-workers, Chem. Lett. 1259 (1991).
K. Tamura, T. Masuda, and T. Higashimura, Polym. Bull. 30, 537 (1993).
B. Z. Tang and N. Kotera, Macromolecules 22, 4388 (1989).
R. Nomura, K. Watanabe, and T. Masuda, Polym. Bull. 43, 177 (1999).
D.-J. Liaw and co-workers, Makromol. Chem., Rapid Commun. 6, 309 (1985).
D.-J. Liaw and co-workers, Polym. J. 24, 889 (1992).
D.-J. Liaw and C.-L. Lin, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 31, 3152 (1993).
R. R. Schrock and co-workers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 3883 (1996).
H. H. Fox and R. R. Schrock, Organometallics 11, 2763 (1992).
H. H. Fox and co-workers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 2827 (1994).
F. J. Schattenmann, R. R. Schrock, and W. M. Davis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 3295
(1996).
T. J. Katz and co-workers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 2659 (1984).
K. Yokota and co-workers, Polym. J. 25, 1079 (1993).
A. Furlani and co-workers, Polym. Bull. 16, 311 (1986).
A. Furlani and co-workers, J. Polym. Sci., Part A 27, 75 (1989).
M. Tabata, W. Yang, and K. Yokota, Polym. J. 22, 1105 (1990).
M. Lindgren and co-workers, Polymer 32, 1531 (1991).
M. Tabata, W. Yang, and K. Yokota, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 32, 1113
(1994).
M. Tabata and co-workers, Macromolecules 27, 6234 (1994).
Y. Goldberg and H. Alper, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1209 (1994).
J. Schniedermeier and H.-J. Haupt, J. Organomet. Chem. 506, 41 (1996).
H. Katayama and co-workers, Organometallics 16, 4497 (1997).
R. Vilar and co-workers, Eur. Polym. J. 30, 1237 (1994).
A. Escudero and co-workers, Eur. Polym. J. 31, 1135 (1995).
B. Z. Tang and co-workers, Macromolecules 30, 2209 (1997).
H. Hori, C. Six, and W. Leitner, Macromolecules 32, 3178 (1999).
Y. Kishimoto and co-workers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 12131 (1994).
K. Hirao and co-workers, Macromolecules 31, 3405 (1998).
Y. Kishimoto, T. Noyori, P. Eckerle, T. Miyatake, and T. Ikariya, in J. C. Salamone, ed.,
Polymeric Material Encyclopedia, Vol. 7, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1996, p. 5051.
Vol. 1
171.
172.
173.
174.
175.
176.
177.
178.
179.
180.
181.
182.
183.
184.
185.
186.
187.
188.
189.
190.
191.
192.
193.
194.
195.
196.
197.
198.
199.
200.
201.
202.
203.
204.
205.
206.
207.
208.
209.
210.
211.
212.
213.
214.
39
40
215.
216.
217.
218.
219.
220.
221.
222.
223.
224.
225.
226.
227.
228.
229.
230.
231.
232.
233.
234.
235.
236.
237.
238.
239.
240.
241.
242.
243.
244.
245.
246.
247.
248.
249.
250.
251.
252.
253.
254.
255.
256.
257.
258.
259.
260.
261.
262.
263.
264.
Vol. 1
Vol. 1
ACRYLAMIDE POLYMERS
41
265.
266.
267.
268.
270. J. Sedlacek
and J. Vohlidal, Makromol. Chem., Rapid Commun. 14, 51 (1993).
RYOJI NOMURA
TOSHIO MASUDA
Kyoto University