Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SIGNIFICANCE
LIMITATION
Ausman
Framework
for Functionality includes
Interoperability
Dogac et.al, exploiting
the
of web service
1. Relating the services with electronic is demanding.
2002 [2]
semantics of Web
services
through
catalogs, describing the complementary
UDDI registries.
services and finding services according to
the properties of products or services.
2. The ontology model developed is general
enough to be used with any service
registry.
3. Integrate the described service semantics
to UDDI registries.
Brahim
Medjahed
et.al 2003 [7]
Framework
for An ontology-based model
automatic
composition of web service.
composition of Web
services.
Sven
Overhage
et.al
2003,
[12]
Simona
Framework
for
Colucci et.al discovery
of
2004[15]
services, stored in
an UDDI registry,
which exposes a
description whose
semantic can be
modeled
using
OWL-DL
based
formalism.
provided
for Quality
of
service
composition is
yet
under
investigation.
WS-Specification
maintains
backward- Interoperability
compatibility to UDDI and is ordered using a of web service
thematic grouping that consists of white, yellow, is demanding.
blue, and green pages.
Requirement of
ontology
to
describe
services.
Brahim
A novel matching use of ontology mapping approaches to support Limited query
Medjahed
framework for Web the matching of contexts that have different types answered.
et.al,2006[49]
within the same category
service composition.
Shuiguang
Deng
et.al
2004 [22]
Jian
Yang
et.al,
2004[28]
DartFlow
framework
Preeda
Rajasekaran
et.al2005[35]
Simone
et.al,
2006[54]
A. A
matchmaking
framework
for
service discovery in
Grid environments
K.D.
Bouzakis
et.al,
2009[74]
a
web
based
framework
independent from
any
specific
CAD/CAM
software
Efficient under
small service.
non-functional
service
properties, such
as
price,
security
mechanisms,
and
performance
may impact the
choice
of
service
alternatives.
Registries
didnt provide
any
value-added
service.