Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
* Correspondent author
Telephone: 91-11-25847649
Fax: 91-11-25846420
E-mail: saxena461@yahoo.com
262
263
Fig. 2Schematic diagram of steps involved in the newly developed method for the quantitative estimation of potassium in culture
broth supernatant
264
Discussion
Several methods are available for estimation of
potassium based on the ability of potassium to
precipitate sodium cobaltinitrite from blood serum.
However, the spectrophotometric estimation of
potassium in the culture supernatant of microbes has
not been attempted. One of the main disadvantages
among the available methods is the indirect analysis
of potassium through precipitation in different
complex forms and detection of components, other
than potassium. Another disadvantage is that all the
methods for the estimation of potassium are time
consuming, and not suitable for bacterial cultures,
where
the
bacterial
metabolites,
including
polysaccharides/mucilage
interfere
with
the
spectrophotometric observations.
In the present study, a new spectrophotometric
method was developed to quantify potassium in the
culture
broth
supernatant.
There
are
spectrophotometric methods available for estimation
of cobalt, rather than nitrite13-16. Among these, one
method involves dissolving the precipitate with dilute
HNO3, followed by heating and addition of alcoholic
ammonium thiocyanate solution after cooling for
colour development13. Another method employs the
suspension of the precipitate in distilled water,
followed by immersion in boiling water bath for
complete dissolution. To the cooled solution choline
hydrochloride and sodium ferrocyanide solutions are
Table 1Comparative quantification of available K in the supernatant of bacterial culture broth by flame photometric and developed
spectrophotometric methods
Bacterial cultures
Newly developed
spectrophotometric
method
SEM
CD (0.01)
Control
21.6
20.3
1.3
1.396
3.86
60.8
54.7
6.1
1.695
4.68
66.4
67.5
1.1
1.184
3.27
72.8
77.4
4.6
2.654
7.34
52
45.5
6.5
2.053
5.67
57.2
52.8
4.4
1.757
4.86
44.8
42.4
2.4
2.884
7.97
SEM
2.410
1.177
CD (0.01)
6.66
3.25
3.77
5.38
Average
*Correlation coefficient: 0.978; Correlation was significant at the 0.01 level.
265
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to Department of
Biotechnology (DBT) for financial assistance.
References
1
266