Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Legal Encyclopedias
While Sections 39.02 and 39.03 both can be misdemeanors, they must be
prosecuted in
district court as if they were felonies. Vernon's Ann.C.Cr.P. art. 4.05 gives
the
district courts exclusive jurisdiction over all offenses relating to official
misconduct. The term “official misconduct” here relates to any form of
misconduct,
which is considerably broader than the offenses defined in Chapter 39.[FN2]
Official
misconduct is defined, for purposes of court jurisdiction, by Sections
21.002(b)(2)
and 87.011(3) of the Government Code and includes any intentional
unlawful behavior
relating to official duties by a person entrusted with the administration of
justice
or execution of the law.
[FN2] See State v. Williams, 780 S.W.2d 891 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1989,
no pet.);
Emerson v. State, 727 S.W.2d 267 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Gallagher v. State,
690 S.W.2d
587 (Tex.Crim.App.1985); State v. Denton, 893 S.W.2d 125 (Tex.App.—
Austin 1995, pet.
ref'd).