Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 198

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 1 of 198

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS


OF LANCASTER COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
and
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiffs

v.
HOTEL BRUNSWICK

:
:
:
:
:

and
ROGER FITZWATER, JR.,
WOODCREST AUDIO
and
THE JAMES STREET INVESTMENT DISTRICT
and

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CASE NO. _________

CI-15-10167

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

THE LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION


and
THE LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION
HONORARY BOARD MEMBERS
SENATOR GIBSON ARMSTRONG
CHARLES SMITHGALL
GLENN ROBINSON
LARRY ALEXANDER
MICHAEL O'DAY
BRAD HEPFER
TIMOTHY MARSDEN
Defendants
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

AND NOW comes Complainant, Stanley J. Caterbone, as pro se, and respectfully avers as follows:
Petitioner, Stanley J. Caterbone, resides at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA, 17603, and Advanced
Media Group, Petitioners. The Complainant will also file a Motion for Leave In Forma Pauperis Status.
Petitioner files a civil complaint against the DEFENDANTS named in the above caption on this 20th
day of November, 2015.
\S\ Stanley J. Caterbone
_____________________________

Date: November 20, 2015

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
amgroup01@msn.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Page 1 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 2 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR RELIEF
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Until this said Court is instructed to enforce either Civil Preliminary Emergency Andrew
Injunction
in cases
Gamber
no. 08-13373, Preliminary Emergency Injunction for Relief of December 28, 2009 or Preliminary
Emergency Injunction for Relief Case No. 15-06985 the Complainant will suspend all activities of this case
due to the following:
AFFIDAVIT
I, Stanley J. Caterbone, Targeted Individual or TI, residing at: 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania, 17603, do hereby state that I am at least 18 years of age, that I am a citizen or a legal
resident of the United States of America, that I am of sound mind, and that I am the person whose

CI-15-10167

signature follows on this Affidavit. The purpose of this document is (1) to advise Congress as well as state
and local officials of organized stalking and electronic and mind manipulation torture being committed
against me and (2) to request a state, local, or Congressional investigation and hearing on the use of
remotely-operated directed energy attacks and mind control technologies on Americans in this country.
Our Government is responsible for protecting its citizens from elements that covertly harass,
torment, murder, and cause victims to commit suicide through organized stalking and remote electronic
torture. Yet, unbiased research indicates that certain elements of Government either engage in these
activities or protect those who perform them. I seek the complete dismantling of any officially-sanctioned
covert Government torture programs, the passage of legislation specifically outlawing that high-tech
torture, and the full prosecution of any person, regardless of his rank or position, who has violated my civil
rights and my most basic human rights. The assaults on my mind and body have been occurring for 24
year(s) and include, but are not limited to the following victimization's:
1.Blanketing my dwelling and surroundings with electromagnetic energy. Bombarding my body
with debilitating electronic and mind manipulation effects. Directed Energy Weapons Causing Severe Pain
to Body and Brain. Began in at least 2005 and still continuing, with complaints to Freedom From Covert
Harassment and Surveillance, FFCHS in 2009, and in cited in various state and federal court cases over
the past several years.

Attacks causing severe artificial pain most likely from Directed Energy Devices

synchronized with telepathic harassment and organized stalking and harassment have been logged and
reported to law enforcement and medical professionals since 2008.

Prior to 2008 the attacks were

experienced and reported to medical professionals but the sources were not known. Also reported attacks
of pain to a family physician, emergency room personnel and psychiatrists.
2.Invading my thoughts via remote sensing technologies.I Was sent an autonomous email in 1998
introducing the term remote viewing. Various technologies and tactics are being used to create
emotional signatures that induce various emotional states; a systematic complete hacking of my mind.

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 2 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 3 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
3.Making me mentally hear others' voices through the microwave hearing effect.
Synthetic
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically
Filed***
and/or Mental Telepathy. First started to experience telepathy/synthetic telepathy in 2005 with full-time
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
24/7 connection during the same time to present. When full-time telepathy started a Andrew
male conducted
Gamber
interrogations lasting several hours at a time concerning a wealth of subjects including ISC/CIA
Knowledge. Cannot disconnect from continuous conversations at all times with one female person. The
handlers know everything I know and experience in real time. During 2006 and 2007 have been telepathic
with some 10 or more persons, both male and female for short durations. Can recall most conversations
and subject matter with identities of who they said they were. Interrogation type harassment is still being
used telepathically to harass and for some sleep deprivation. Made first complaints to DARPA, the FBI,
and U.S. Senator Arlen Specter in 2007. Some conversations by the persons that are telepathic with me
elude to some program similar to the DARPA datalog program where they record your entire life.

CI-15-10167

Everything that you try to do on a daily basis is subject matter for conversation and harassment.

Interference with thought, harassment, and interrogation is used often times with electromagnetic weapon
attacks to the brain or body.
4.Depriving me of sleep due to neurological intervention. Mostly Experienced Sleep Deprivation
Techniques during periods of time in 2008 to 2010. Mostly with attacks of pain from Directed Energy
Weapons to back, neck, head (brain); and heart on a few occasions; and with harassment from telepathy.
5.Introducing poisonous gas and radiation toxins into my home.

First experienced toxic gases

(Chloroform?) in heavy doses in 2006-2007. Made complaints to the Lancaster City Police Department
and the Southern Regional Police. Experienced attacks that would cause dizziness at home, in automobile
and in public. Was informed it was being released through a distribution system the size of fishing line.
To counter attacks used cotton in nostrils and gas mask. In 2009 experienced attacks of what is said to be
sleeping gas, when attacked could not open eyes. Took Pictures during some attacks.
6.Having me stalked en masse on foot and in vehicles. vandalizing my home and/or car. Gang
Stalking or Organized Stalking began in 1987 and continues today. It includes strangers using gestures
such as finger under eye; various forms of harassment; and public mobbing. Complaints have been filed
in 1987; 1992;1998 and 2005 to 2010. Complaints were made to various public officials and local, state,
and federal agencies as mental duress. The terms organized stalking, gang stalking, targeted individual,
etc., was not learned until a few years ago. The organized stalking and harassment followed in several
states, some while traveling from Lancaster, Pennsylvania to California. Tracking technologies may have
been used and most likely are still being used. Police were involved in most places.
7.Tapping (Bugging) my phones. Complaints of phone tapping/tampering were made to New Jersey
Bell in 1987 with a service call to Stone Harbor, New Jersey to check lines and phones. The same was
done by a Bell Atlantic repairman in Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1998. In 2004 a complaint with a report
number was filed with the Pennsylvania Attorney General Office in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Agent Amy
Zelnick) regarding interference with phone calls and impersonations by perps intercepting and rerouting
CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 3 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 4 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
calls. Computer Hacking complaints were filed to local authorities in the County of Lancaster
and the
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically
Filed***
Cyber Crime unit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2005 to 2010.
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
8.Blacklisting me in the labor market. Filed complains of employment discrimination with the
Pennsylvania Attorney General in 2006 and the Lancaster County Human Relations Commission in 2008.
9.Workplace mobbing. Experienced in 1987 at Financial Management Group, Ltd., American Helix of
High Industries in 1991 and Pflumm Contractors, Inc., in 1997/1998, and in the Federal, State, and Local
Courts. Filed complaints and logs as mental duress and harassment. Was forced out of all 3 organizations
as a result of the mobbing and harassment.

CI-15-10167

10.Public Mobbing. Public type mobbing and organized stalking and harassment was perpetrated heavily
in the years 2005 to 2010 in the following places: The Lancaster County Courthouse, The Lancaster
County Public Library, the Pennsylvania Career Link, and the Millersville University Library and University
Offices. I was given suspicious and illegal No Trespass Notices in some 18 public places in Lancaster
County in the years 2005 to 2009 without just cause. I was complaining of stalking and harassing in most
all of those public places. The Lancaster County Public Library and the Millersville University took away
my access to a computer after my personal computers were vandalized and/or hacked inoperable. Fulton
Bank took away my safe deposit box. Others included my church of worship, various bars and restaurants
and one attorneys office. Complaints have been filed regarding the same in courts and with various
authorities.

11.Attempted Murder. Experienced with an attempt of vehicular homicide in 1991 after National News
Media reported ISC/CIA-NSA connection of Arms to Irag.

The incident involved a vehicle changing

lanes and direction and heading directly toward me in the wrong direction running me off the road,
narrowly missing a tree. I Filed the incident in federal courts and used as a motion to seal federal case
no. 05-2288 in 2005 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
12.Pet Killing. Cat was killed in 2005 with complaints to the Lancaster County Humane Shelter and the
Southern Regional Police Department.
13.Illegal Entries of Home/Properties. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then again in 1991;
1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance claims, most with the
Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania , State Farm and Harleysville Insurance
Companies.
14.Illegal Repossessions. Airplane in 1987 containing legal and business files. Home/Property and
Contents in 2006 also containing legal and business files and documents.

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 4 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 5 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
15.Physical Assaults. One attack and filed complaint with police report in Los Osos California
in 2005
LANCASTER,
PA and
Filed***
numerous in the City of Lancaster, including on November 19, 2015; reported to***Electronically
the Manheim Township
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Police at about 1:00pm. Police reports were filed and obtained for most
Andrew Gamber
16.False Arrests. Experienced 7 in 1987 and more than 22 in 2005 and 2006 in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The false arrests were charges that were all
dismissed prior to court hearings.
17.False Imprisonments. Spent 7 to 10 days in Lancaster County Prison in 1987 with all charges
dismissed and again for some 60 days in 2006 with all charges dismissed. The 60 Days of imprisonment of
2006 was triggered with a false report of missing a bail supervision meeting, which was confirmed to be

CI-15-10167

false in court; however bail was maliciously and purposefully reinstated as secured instead of unsecured.
The appropriate appeal was filed which secured my release after some 60 days of false imprisonment.
There were no charges that resulted in any convictions.
18.Psychiatric Abuses with False Suicide Allegations from Perpetrators/Stalkers. One in 1987
resulting in a forced hospitalization for several hours by police in Stone Harbor, New Jersey. And one
again in February of 2005 resulting in police restraining me in my home and abusing me.

This one was a

fraudulent and phony email sent to police by a perp. The Southern Regional Police had to vacate after the
email was proven to be a fraud. Again in 2009, 2010, and 2015.
19.Vandalism to Property. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then again in 1991; 1997-1998;
and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance claims, most with the Southern
Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania and Harleysville Insurance Company. 3
computers have been rendered inoperable since 2005 along with various electronics equipment; dvd
recorders; printers; household items; appliances; etc., Most insurance claims have been paid. In the past
years a wave of purchased items, online and in stores, were received broken or the wrong item and all
had to be returned. Some included items to secure my property, and others included computer related
items, others were household and clothing items. Last report to the Lancaster City Police on November 19,
2015 to Officer Sgt. Cosmore.
20.Gas Lighting. The illegal entering of home and causing psychological duress by moving items and or
hiding items. First reported in 1998 to the Conestoga Police and continued to present. Clothing was also
manipulated and altered. The term gas lighting was only learned in 2010, although it was reported to
police as harassment by neighbors of friends. The daily draining of my hot tub was also used as a
psychological warfare tactic and used to run up utility bills. Numerous complaints were made to police in
2008 to 2010.

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 5 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 6 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically
Filed***
21.Thefts of Property. Not Yet Completed.
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
22.Vandalism to Car/Truck. Since 2005 have experienced years of gas siphoning, battery outages,
letting air out of tires, and wetting of inside of floor mats as psychological warfare tactics by perps and
stalkers. Made numerous complaints the Lancaster City Police Department.
23.Toxic Chemical Causing Running Nose. Experienced on regular basis in 2009 when in public places.
Was not in conjunction with cold/flu symptoms. Research states it is a tactic used in organized stalking.
Heavy doses in the fall of 2015.

CI-15-10167

24.Computer Hacking. Computer Hacking complaints were filed to local authorities in the County of

Lancaster and the Cyber Crime unit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2005 to 2010. Numerous
complaint numbers have been secured. Complaints of cell phone hacking was also reported in 2010.
Websites and blogs were regularly hacked and sometimes taken off-line. Electronic calenders, court
documents, and financial records were often hacked causing many problems of the years, including having
to withdraw civil complaints. Filed documentation in U.S.C.A. Case No. 15-3400 as EXHIBIT.
25.Cyber Stalking. Most in 2005 to 2010, and 2015. Complaints to Microsoft legal counsel, Yahoo
Message Board, and the FBI Cyber Crime Unit.
26.Interference/Delay/Theft of U.S. Mails. First reported to U.S. Postmaster of mail tampering and
illegal changing of address in 1987. In 2008 to 2009 have made several more complaints to the U.S.
Postmaster Inspector General who claim to have begun investigations. Some caused missed court
hearings and other missed appointments and or meetings. Made Complaints during U.S. District Case No.
14-02259 and U.S.C.A. 15-3400 through November 20, 2015.
27.Electromagnetic Weapons Causing Severe Muscle Spasms/Cramps. First experienced in 2006 to
present. One experience in 2006 was while I was in my hot tub and the pain and cramp was so severe in
my left calf muscle (you automatically bend over to rub it out, which placed my head underwater) I had to
crawl out of the hot tub before almost drowning.
28.Electromagnetic Weapons Causing Sexual Stimulation. First experienced in 2005.
29.Forced Hospitalizations. Forced Hospitalizations in 1987 (2) one for 6 hours and one for 5 days;
2006 one for 3 days; 2009 one for several hours while in intensive care for emergency surgery; and 2010
one for 8 days. Filed complaints to Citizens Commission for Human Rights in 1991 and 2008.

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 6 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 7 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
30.Manipulation and Theft of Documents. Numerous thefts and manipulation of allLANCASTER,
legal and business
PA
***Electronically
Filed***
documents both in paper and in electronic format have occurred since 1987. Microfiche/Microfilming
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
began in 1987 and other measures to secure documents have been ongoing to present.
Numerous
Andrew
Gamber
complaints have been filed with law enforcement since 1987.

CI-15-10167

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 7 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 8 of 198


CIVIL COMPLAINT
INTRODUCTION

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP have suffered irreparable harm to its reputation and to
its efforts to continue its business operations while as a petitioner in a Chapter 11 Reorganization
Plan filed on May 23, 2005 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District as case
no. 05-23059.

CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP were also continuing a decade long investment in
projects located in the Downtown Lancaster Investment District that have been maliciously
sabotaged with ease due to the gross abuse; negligence; and abuse of process of the Lancaster

CI-15-10167

City Bureau of Police coupled with the false arrests and the malicious prosecutions. Three main
projects include a UPS Shipping and Copy Store (CATERBONE retains an exclusivity agreement with
UPS); Excelsior Place Business Plan; and the Downtown Theater at Hotel Brunswick 1. CATERBONE
and the ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP have been an active advocate and supporter of the Downtown
Lancaster Convention Center and the revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and have demonstrated
a record of support and advocacy through its meeting and communications with major
stakeholders, public officials, and attendance at public meetings.

In November of 2007,

CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group went public with their Downtown Lancaster
investments and business plans that were culminated over the past 9 years. The Advanced Media
Group also formerly and publicly introduced their Downtown Lancaster Action Plan 2 via handouts,
websites, and blogs; and began meetings and negotiations with major stakeholders, City of
Lancaster Public Officials, Developers, and investors.

CATERBONE has formerly applied to be on the Lancaster Convention Center Authority Board of
Directors in 2007 and has petitioned for a seat on the Lancaster County Government Study Group
in 2006.

The PLAINTIFF, Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE), alleges that the City of Lancaster and the
Lancaster City Bureau of Police and others colluded to deliberately ignore CATERBONES
complaints, an abuse of process, in an effort to retaliate, subvert, interrupt and deter current and
ongoing litigation and civil complaints against several major businesses and government agencies
with headquarters in the City of Lancaster and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Those would
include the Lancaster General Hospital; High Industries (not Penn Square Partners and the
Lancaster County Convention Center); Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial Corporation; a Wachovia
Bank branch (pending); Lancaster Newspapers; the County of Lancaster; the Lancaster County
Prison; the Hotel Brunswick (pending); James Street Investment District (pending); Aurora Films;
Haverstick Films (pending); and the Lancaster City Bureau of Police. The City of Lancaster and the

A description and narrative can be seen on the Advanced Media Groups blog Journey of a
Whisleblower at www.
The Downtown Lancaster Action Plan can be viewed on the Advanced Media Groups blog Journey of a
Whisleblower at www.

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 8 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 9 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Lancaster City Bureau of Police are derelict in their duties in forcing CATERBONE
to litigate
for
LANCASTER,
PA
Filed***
duties and services due CATERBONE that are mandated in the bylaws of ***Electronically
the City of Lancaster.
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
CATERBONE also alleges that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police were used Andrew
to retaliate,
subvert,
Gamber
interrupt and deter other litigation and civil complaints against other police departments, namely
the Southern Regional Police Department, the Manheim Township Police Department, the East
Lampeter Police Department, the Millersville Boro Police, the Avalon Police Department and the
Stone Harbor Police Department.

CATERBONE alleges that Southern Regional Police Chief John

Fiorill used is official capacity as President of the Red Rose Chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police
to help accomplish these civil torts.

CATERBONE alleges that by ignoring his complaints the Lancaster City Police Bureau of Police gave
the green light, or approval, for others to continue a long and successful period of harassment,

CI-15-10167

thievery, property damage, computer and electronic hacking, deletion and manipulation of court
related documents, records and evidence, mail fraud, eaves dropping, invasion of privacy, criminal
trespass, and the like. These activities are so intense that they have taken on the characteristics
of a hate crime.

CATERBONE alleges that the gross abuse and gross negligence defamed his name and that of his
company, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, which discredited his reputation in an effort to diminish
credibility in the courts; to thwart any reprimands by oversight agencies; and to disrupt and thwart
any possible business relations and operations of ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP. This has resulted in
direct and immediate financial loss, loss of time, and loss of income.

CATERBONE had complained of abuse of process to state and federal law enforcement regarding
the situation, including U.S. Senator Arlen Specters office.

CATERBONE had also visited the

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in both Harrisburg and Philadelphia for help and intervention.

CATERBONE also had personal meetings with Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray in Lancaster City Hall
on at least 4 occasions to find a solution to the problems and for help to mediate the problems and
or resolve the conflicts.

The resulting pain and suffering, as well as loss and destruction of

property and financial loss that CATERBONE was undergoing was unprecedented.

In November of 2007, CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group went public with their
Downtown Lancaster investments and business plans that were culminated over the past 9 years.
The Advanced Media Group also formerly and publicly introduced their Downtown Lancaster Action
Plan via handouts, websites, and blogs; and began meetings and negotiations with major
stakeholders, City of Lancaster Public Officials, Developers, and investors.

CAUSES OF ACTION

On March 18, 2008 CATERBONE went to the Hotel Brunswick in Downtown Lancaster to continue
take measurements of the Movie Theater for his continued efforts of a business and development
plan.

(The Brunswick Movie Theater, or Eric, had been closed since 1995.

CATERBONE and

Advanced Media Group had an agreement with the Owner of the Brunswick, Hamid Zahedi, to
make a formal proposal and offer for leasing the site. CATERBONE had begun discussions in 2006.)
CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 9 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 10 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
CATERBONE noticed that the United States Department of Justice Office of Trustee
was conducting
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically
Filed***
3
hearings for Chapter 11 petitioners in the Presidential Room of the Hotel Brunswick .
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
CATERBONE thought maybe Dave Adams, the trustee for the United States Department
of Justice
Office of Trustee might be conducting the hearings 4.

CATERBONE had gone to the Presidential

Room and had a discussion with the person administering the Bankruptcy Hearings.

The following day CATERBONE received a disturbing email from Mr. Barry A. Solodky, Esquire, of
Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C., 28 Penn Square, Lancaster, PA 17603. CATERBONE had known
Mr. Solodky since the 1980s and had even solicited him to review his bankruptcy matters before
the Appllent filed his Chapter 11 case on May 23, 2005. The following email exchanges detail the
incident and the false reports and allegations from a member of Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C.:
Subject:
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:18:00 -0400
From: bas@bbt-law.com
To: amgroup01@msn.com

CI-15-10167

Hi Stan,
Hope this note finds you well.
Yesterday afternoon I had to attend some bankruptcy meetings on behalf of some clients.
While there the Trustee told me about an event which concerned her. She showed me your
3

CATERBONE had not received ORDERS from his United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No.
08-3054 for his appeal of an issue in his Chapter 11 Case No. 05-23059. CATERBONE alleged that the
ORDERS were stolen or never mailed from the clerk of courts.

Sometime in February of 2008 by way of computer hacking or misconduct within the staff of the Clerk of
Court of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, CATERBONE was erroneously and maliciously placed on
electronic email distribution with no paper copies for all of his ORDERS for all of his cases, which at that
time numbered four (4), without the knowledge of CATERBONE. After receiving one of the email alerts
and ORDERS CATERBONE personally visited the Clerk of Court for the Third Circuit and was told by staff
that it was just a new courtesy copy. The staff did not notify CATERBONE that his cases would not be
eligible for paper copies of ORDERS. CATERBONE was alleging since February that his ORDERS were
being stolen in the U.S. mails, and only received information in April on the bottom of a copy of a letter
attached to an ORDER for Case No. 3054 that he was switched to electronic email distribution with no
paper copies. This makes no sense since, filing as pro se, CATERBONE is not eligible to file any electronic
documents in any U.S. or Pennsylvania Courts without a Pennsylvania Bar License. On several occasions
since February 2008, CATERBONE was not able to open the Third Circuit electronic ORDERS on the first
attempt, which denied CATERBONE access or knowledge of the Third Circuit ORDERS with no way of
retrieving them again. CATERBONE was not even able to respond or know how the United States Third
Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled or what ORDERS were handed down, which also denied CATERBONE
any chance to follow court mandated responses in a timely fashion. On May 29, 2008 at approximately
9:15 am CATERBONE called Ms. Charlene Ciscaden, case manager for the U.S. Third Circuit of Appeals
that manages CATERBONES cases from his cell phone (717) 669-2163). Ms. Ciscaden stated the
following:
o 1. Motion for Extension of 07-4475 GRANTED on May 22, 2008
o Motion for Extension of 07-4474 GRANTED on May 27, 2008
o The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals has no electronic email address for me.
o Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group was never taken off of paper copies for any U.S.
Third Circuit Court of Appeals ORDERS, MOTIONS, or ANY COMMUNICATIONS.
o All ORDERS, MOTIONS, and COMMUNICATIONS have been sent via 1st Class U.S. Postal
Service.
CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 10 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 11 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
card and told me what happened. In fact she said she almost considered
calling the PA
police
LANCASTER,
because of the incident.
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
I assured her you were not the type of person that would do anything inappropriate.
I did
Andrew Gamber
want you to know she is not an employee of the Dept. of Justice or the Bankruptcy Court;
she is a private panel trustee just as I was for 33 years. If for some reason you have issues
with the bankruptcy system she is not a person who should be hassled as she has nothing
to do with your case.
I'm sending this only because I don't want there to be any further incidents which might
cause her concern or the Federal marshals will get involved and I know they can be nasty.
Needless to say I don't want to see anything to you which would cause you any problems.
I am sure I will bump into you soon. Have a nice Easter.
Barry A. Solodky, Esquire
Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C.
28 Penn Square
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 509-7273

CI-15-10167

14. CATERBONEs Response to Mr. Barry A. Solodkys email:


RE: Meeting wih the Dept of Justice.
From:
Stan Caterbone (amgroup01@msn.com)
Sent:
Sat 3/22/08 8:36 AM
To:
Barry A. Solodky (bas@bbt-law.com)
FBI, Field Office (philadelphia@fbi.gov); Landis, Detective Michael
Cc:
(landism@co.lancaster.pa.us); info@hotelbrunswick.com
Bcc:
March 22, 2008
Re: Meeting With Department of Justice
Barry Solodky,
First, I would have responded earlier, however, your email found it's way into my junk
email.
Secondly, as an officer of the court, you better be careful about spreading lies about me
and fabrications about events that did not happen. By the way, a copy of this will go
directly to the Federal Bureau of Investigation Philadelphia Field Office and Detective
Michael Landis of the Lancaster County District Attorney Office. Who do you think you are
talking to?
Thirdly, here is what transpired. The day before I received an ORDER from the Third Circuit
Court of Appeals, which was purposely postmarked 10 days after the Clerk filed and dated
the Mail to copy to myself. The ORDER was for a no response to a Show Cause ORDER,
which someone had stole from my mail, which I never received. The Third Circuit case was
an appeal from my Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Now, on Wednesday morning I made plans to go to the Hotel Brunswick and take some
measurements in the Movie Theater, which I am in the middle of a development plan. As
usual, I walked into the lobby on the street level adjacent to the parking garage and saw
the easel with the notice that the "Department of Justice" was holding bankruptcy hearings.
I was told a few years ago earlier in my Chapter 11 that they often hold hearings in
Lancaster, at the Brunswick or at the Hotel on Manheim Pike. As soon as I saw the sign I
CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 11 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 12 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
figured I would see if Joe Adams, my Trustee from the Philadelphia
OfficePAof the
LANCASTER,
Department of Justice Office of Trustee that handles my case, was
here.
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
So, as I usually do, I went to the office of Kevin, the Hotel BrunswickAndrew
GeneralGamber
Manager to
get the key to the movie theater, as per our agreement with Hamid, the owner of the Hotel
Brunswick. He was not in his office, and the Desk Manager had to page him. I asked him
where the Department of Justice was holding the hearings, and told him I needed to talk to
someone there, while he was trying to locate Kevin, the General Manager. I told him I
would be right back.
I went to the Presidential Room where they were holding meetings. When I arrived,
the Trustee, or what private panel trustee, was conducting a meeting with a Spanish
woman, who had a young girl for a translator. I patiently waited by the wall as you walk in
until the entire interview was over. After the private panel trustee dismissed the woman, I
approached her and asked her if she was from the Department of Justice Office of the
Trustee, and she responded that she was a private panel trustee. I simply told her that I
had a problem with someone obstructing justice with my Third CircuitCI-15-10167
case and asked her if
Joe Adams was in her office. She said she was not from the Philadelphia Office. I gave her
my card and some woman kept trying to talk and interfere. I just calmly left. I went to
meet Kevin, the General Manager, he opened the movie theater and I spent approximately
1 hour taking measurements of the existing floor plan.
There was no incident to speak of. Any incident was a lie, regardless of the person that
kept interfering with our conversation that was trying to cause problems. It was not me,
you fool.
I would suggest that you provide this email to the person that told you that fabricated lie
and anyone else that you communicate with regarding your so called version of an
"incident". Follow this link and you may read why people like you lie about these incidents.

Now, you have a nice Easter Weekend. And by the way, I am a supporter of Senator Clinton and
I do volunteer my services, just in case you were wondering.

Advanced Media Group


Stan J. Caterbone
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
On April 22, 2008 the Plaintiff, Stan J. Caterbone (CATERBONE) visited the office of the owner of
the Hotel Brunswick, Hamed (HAMED) to discuss the reasons for the delay in delivering the
business plan and development plan for the Downtown Theater at Hotel Brunswick, as promised.

Upon entering the office, HAMED claimed to have sent CATERBONE a letter notifying he was no
longer allowed on the premises because CATERBONE allegedly disrupted a meeting.

CATERBONE responded by first stating that CATERBONE never received such a letter.

CATERBONE then responded that CATERBONE never disrupted a meeting, nor did CATERBONE ever
here of any such incident except the email from Attorney Barry Solodky.

CATERBONE put HAMED on notice that CATERBONE would summon authorities and handle the
situation. CATERBONE assumed that the HOTEL BRUNSWICK and HAMED were leaked some of the
preliminary business and development plan from CATERBONES computer and wanted the theater
project for themselves or another party, as with the LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION, and the
JAMES STREET BUSINESS DISTRICT.

CATERBONE immediately went to the Office of Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray to report the

incident.
CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 12 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 13 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
CATERBONE had direct talks and personal meetings with both Pennsylvania Senator
GibsonPA
LANCASTER,
***Electronically
Filed***
Armstrong and Pennsylvania House of Representative Michael Sturla regarding
obtaining grants
for
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
funding some of the theater project because of the independent film strategy. Andrew
Both were
Gamber
optimistic, although the staffer (Mr. Thompson) for AMRSTRONG noted that someone had
approached ARMSTRONG about a movie theater downtown, and immediately put down
CATERBONES efforts and the location and site.

CATERBONE had also talks and negotiations with HAMED for the corner storefront of Chestnut and
Queen Streets for the UPS/FEDEX Copy Store.

In 2008 CATERBONE had several discussions with Mary Haverstick of Haverstick Films to discuss
the possibility of working together on the Downtown Theater at Hotel Brunswick. CATERBONE had
known Mary Haverstick since the 1980s.

CI-15-10167

Ms. Haverstick was very interested in supporting the project and a future meeting was being
scheduled to begin formal discussions.

On --------------- CATERBONE had a meeting with Aurora Films in their office on North Queen
Street in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

On ---------------- CATERBONE had a meeting with Mr. Jay Ingram, Executive Director and founder
of the Lancaster Film Commission.

On ---------------- CATERBONE signed an agreement with Roger Fitzsimmons, owner and operator
of Woodcrest Audio to work on the project.

On --------------- CATERBONE signed an agreement with Jeff Lefevre regarding the development of
the Excelsior Place building on East King Street, in Downtown Lancaster.

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 13 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 14 of 198


CAUSES OF ACTION BY DEFENDANTS
HOTEL BRUNSWICK
HAMED .

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

ROGER FITZWATER, JR.,


WOODCREST AUDIO
THE JAMES STREET INVESTMENT DISTRICT
THE LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION
THE LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION HONORARY BOARD MEMBERS
SENATOR GIBSON ARMSTRONG
CHARLES SMITHGALL
GLENN ROBINSON
LARRY ALEXANDER
MICHAEL O'DAY
BRAD HEPFER
TIMOTHY MARSDEN

CI-15-10167

Collusion to Commit Fraud; Libel; Civil Conspiracy; Harasment; Civil Rights Violations; RICO Violations;
Anit-Trust Violations; Theft of Property; Unjust Enrichement; Violations of Intellectual Property Rights.
Damages
Loss of reputation and credit; humiliation; and mental suffering discomfort; injury to health; loss of time;
economic loss due to business and litigation interruption; loss of opportunity; legal fees and punitive
damages.

Plaintiffs seeks jury trial and damages in excess of $100,000.

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 14 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 15 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
CAUSES OF ACTION BY DEFENDANTS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically
Filed***
CAUSES OF ACTIONS IN COMPLAINT
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew
Gamber
Barratry, in criminal and civil law, is the act or practice of bringing repeated legal actions
solely
to harass.
Usually, the actions brought lack merit. This action has been declared a crime in some jurisdictions. For
example, in the U.S. states of California, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, barratry is a misdemeanor. [1] In
England and Wales the offence was abolished in 1967.
Malicious prosecution is a common law intentional tort. While similar to the tort of abuse of process, its
elements include (1) intentionally (and maliciously) instituting or pursuing (or causing to be instituted or
pursued) a legal action (civil or criminal) that is (2) brought without probable cause and (3) dismissed in
favor of the victim of the malicious prosecution. In some jurisdictions, "malicious prosecution" is reserved
for the wrongful initiation of criminal proceedings, while "malicious use of process" refers to the wrongful
initiation of civil proceedings.

CI-15-10167
Criminal prosecuting attorneys, as well as judges, are normally protected, by doctrines
of prosecutorial
immunity and judicial immunity, from tort liability for malicious prosecution.
The mere filing of a complaint cannot constitute an abuse of process. The parties who have abused or
misused the process, have gone beyond the mere filing of a lawsuit. The taking of an appeal, even a
frivolous one, is not enough to constitute an abuse of process. The mere filing or maintenance of a
lawsuit, even for an improper purpose, is not a proper basis for an abuse of process action.
Abuse of process is a common law intentional tort. It is to be distinguished from malicious prosecution,
another type of tort that involves misuse of the public right of access to the courts.
The elements of a valid cause of action for abuse of process in most common law jurisdictions are as
follows: it is the malicious and deliberate misuse or perversion of regularly issued court process (civil or
criminal) not justified by the underlying legal action. "Process" in this context is used in the same sense as
in "service of process," where "process" refers to an official summons or other notice issued from a court.
The person who abuses process is interested only in accomplishing some improper purpose that is
collateral to the proper object of the process and that offends justice, such as an unjustified arrest or an
unfounded criminal prosecution. Subpoenas to testify, attachments of property, executions on property,
garnishments, and other provisional remedies are among the types of "process" considered to be capable
of abuse.
Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue
an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome,
and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action.
Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may bring down sanctions on
the offender.
A single action, even a frivolous one, is not enough to raise a litigant to the level of being declared
vexatious. Roy L. Pearson, Jr., an Administrative Law Judge in the District of Columbia, who sued a drycleaner for $54 million for allegedly losing a pair of his trousers, is sometimes claimed to be a vexatious
litigant; however, he does not have a history of frivolous action like the parties normally considered
vexatious.[citation needed

In criminal law, fraud is the crime or offense of deliberately deceiving another in order to damage them
usually, to obtain property or services unjustly. [1] Fraud can be accomplished through the aid of forged
objects. In the criminal law of common law jurisdictions it may be called "theft by deception," "larceny by
trick," "larceny by fraud and deception" or something similar.
Fraud can be committed through many methods, including mail, wire, phone, and the internet (computer
crime and internet fraud).
CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 15 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 16 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Fraud, in addition to being a criminal act, is also a type of civil law violation known asLANCASTER,
a tort. A tortPA
is a
civil wrong for which the law provides a remedy. A civil fraud typically involves the
act
of
intentionally
***Electronically Filed***
making a false representation of a material fact, with the intent to deceive, which isNov
reasonably
20 2015relied
06:18AM
upon by another person to that person's detriment. A "false representation" can take Andrew
many forms,
such
Gamber
as:

A false statement of fact, known to be false at the time it was made;


A statement of fact with no reasonable basis to make that statement;
A promise of future performance made with an intent, at the time the promise was made, not to
perform as promised;
A statement of opinion based on a false statement of fact;
A statement of opinion that the maker knows to be false; or
An expression of opinion that is false, made by one claiming or implying to have special knowledge
of the subject matter of the opinion. "Special knowledge" in this case means knowledge or
information superior to that possessed by the other party, and to which the other party did not
have equal access.

CI-15-10167

In law, defamation (also called vilification, slander, and libel) is the communication of a statement
that makes a false claim, expressively stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the reputation of an
individual, business, product, group, government or nation. Slander refers to spoken comments, while
libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or images. Most jurisdictions allow
legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless
criticism. Related to defamation is public disclosure of private facts arises where one person reveals
information which is not of public concern, and the release of which would offend a reasonable person. [1]
"Unlike libel or slander, truth is not a defense for invasion of privacy."[2]
False light laws are "intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being."[3] If a
publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If that communication is
not technically false but is still misleading then a tort of false light might have occurred.[3]
Slander and libel
The common law origins of defamation lie in the torts of slander (harmful statement in a transitory form,
especially speech) and libel[4][5] (harmful statement in a fixed medium, especially writing but also a
picture, sign, or electronic broadcast), each of which gives a common law right of action.
"Defamation" is the general term used internationally, and is used in this article where it is not necessary
to distinguish between "slander" and "libel". Libel and slander both require publication. [6] The fundamental
distinction between libel and slander lies solely in the form in which the defamatory matter is published. If
the offending material is published in some fleeting form, as by spoken words or sounds, sign language,
gestures and the like, then this is slander. If it is published in more durable form, for example in written
words, film, compact disc (CD), DVD, blogging and the like, then it is considered libel.
Criminal defamation
Many nations have criminal penalties for defamation in some situations, and different conditions for
determining whether an offense has occurred. ARTICLE 19, Global Campaign for Free Expression, has
published global maps [2] charting the existence of criminal defamation law across the globe. The law is
used predominantly to defend political leaders or functionaries of the state. In Britain, the Italian anarchist
Errico Malatesta was convicted of criminal libel for denouncing the Italian state agent Ennio Belelli in 1912.
While, in Canada, though the law has been applied on only six occasions in the past century, all of those
cases involve libellants attached to the state (police officers, judges, prison guards). In the most recent
case, Bradley Waugh and Ravin Gill were charged with criminal libel for publicly accusing six prison guards
of the racially motivated murder of a black inmate (http://netk.net.au/Canada/Canada15.asp. In
Zimbabwe, "insulting the President" is, by statute, (Public Order and Security Act 2001) a criminal offense.
CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 16 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 17 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Defenses
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Even if a statement is derogatory, there are circumstances in which such statements
are20
permissible
in
Nov
2015 06:18AM
law.
Andrew Gamber
Truth
In many legal systems, adverse public statements about legal citizens presented as fact must be proven
false to be defamatory or slanderous/libel. Proving adverse, public character statements to be true is often
the best defense against a prosecution for libel and/or defamation. Statements of opinion that cannot be
proven true or false will likely need to apply some other kind of defense. The use of the defense of
justification has dangers, however; if the defendant libels the plaintiff and then runs the defense of truth
and fails, he may be said to have aggravated the harm.
Another important aspect of defamation is the difference between fact and opinion. Statements made as
"facts" are frequently actionable defamation. Statements of opinion or pure opinion are
not actionable. In
CI-15-10167
order to win damages in a libel case, the plaintiff must first show that the statements were "statements of
fact or mixed statements of opinion and fact" and second that these statements were false. Conversely, a
typical defense to defamation is that the statements are opinion. One of the major tests to distinguish
whether a statement is fact or opinion is whether the statement can be proved true or false in a court of
law. If the statement can be proved true or false, then, on that basis, the case will be heard by a jury to
determine whether it is true or false. If the statement cannot be proved true or false, the court may
dismiss the libel case without it ever going to a jury to find facts in the case.
In some systems, however, notably the Philippines, truth alone is not a defense.[7] Some U.S. statutes
preserve historical common law exceptions to the defense of truth to libel actions. These exceptions were
for statements "tending to blacken the memory of one who is dead" or "expose the natural defects of one
who is alive." [8]
It is also necessary in these cases to show that there is a well-founded public interest in the specific
information being widely known, and this may be the case even for public figures. Public interest is
generally not "that which the public is interested in," but rather that which is in the interest of the public. [9]
[10]

See also: Substantial truth


Privilege and malice
Privilege provides a complete bar and answer to a defamation suit, though conditions may have to be met
before this protection is granted.
There are two types of privilege in the common law tradition:

"Absolute privilege" has the effect that a statement cannot be sued on as defamatory, even if it
were made maliciously; a typical example is evidence given in court (although this may give rise to
different claims, such as an action for malicious prosecution or perjury) or statements made in a
session of the legislature (known as 'Parliamentary privilege' in Commonwealth countries).
"Qualified privilege" may be available to the journalist as a defense in circumstances where it is
considered important that the facts be known in the public interest; an example would be public
meetings, local government documents, and information relating to public bodies such as the police
and fire departments. Qualified privilege has the same effect as absolute privilege, but does not
protect statements that can be proven to have been made with malicious intent.

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 17 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 18 of 198

Other defenses
Defenses to claims of defamation include:

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Truth is an absolute defense in the United States as well as in the common law jurisdictions of
Canada. In some other countries it is also necessary to show a benefit to the public good in having
the information brought to light.
Statements made in a good faith and reasonable belief that they were true are generally
treated the same as true statements; however, the court may inquire into the reasonableness of
the belief. The degree of care expected will vary with the nature of the defendant: an ordinary
person might safely rely on a single newspaper report, while the newspaper would be expected to
carefully check multiple sources.
Privilege is a defense when witness testimony, attorneys' arguments, and judges' decisions,
rulings, and statements made in court, or statements by legislators on the floor of the legislature,
or statements made by a person to their spouse, are the cause for the claim.CI-15-10167
These statements are
said to be privileged and cannot be cause for a defamation claim.
Opinion is a defense recognized in nearly every jurisdiction. If the allegedly defamatory assertion
is an expression of opinion rather than a statement of fact, defamation claims usually cannot be
brought because opinions are inherently not falsifiable. However, some jurisdictions decline to
recognize any legal distinction between fact and opinion. The United States Supreme Court, in
particular, has ruled that the First Amendment does not require recognition of an opinion privilege.
Fair comment on a matter of public interest, statements made with an honest belief in their
truth on a matter of public interest (official acts) are defenses to a defamation claim, even if such
arguments are logically unsound; if a reasonable person could honestly entertain such an opinion,
the statement is protected.
Consent is an uncommon defense and makes the claim that the claimant consented to the
dissemination of the statement.
Innocent dissemination is a defense available when a defendant had no actual knowledge of the
defamatory statement or no reason to believe the statement was defamatory. The defense can be
defeated if the lack of knowledge was due to negligence. Thus, a delivery service cannot be held
liable for delivering a sealed defamatory letter.
Claimant is incapable of further defamatione.g., the claimant's position in the community is so
poor that defamation could not do further damage to the plaintiff. Such a claimant could be said to
be "libel-proof," since in most jurisdictions, actual damage is an essential element for a libel claim.

In addition to the above, the defendant may claim that the allegedly defamatory statement is not actually
capable of being defamatoryan insulting statement that does not actually harm someone's reputation is
prima facie not libelous.
Special rules apply in the case of statements made in the press concerning public figures. A series of court
rulings led by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) established that for a public official (or
other legitimate public figure) to win a libel case, the statement must have been published knowing it to
be false or with reckless disregard to its truth, (also known as actual malice).
Under United States law, libel generally requires five key elements. The plaintiff must prove that the
information was published, the plaintiff was directly or indirectly identified, the remarks were defamatory
towards the plaintiff's reputation, the published information is false, and that the defendant is at fault.
The Associated Press estimates that 95% of libel cases involving news stories do not arise from highprofile news stories, but "run of the mill" local stories like news coverage of local criminal investigations or
trials, or business profiles. Media liability insurance is available to newspapers to cover potential damage
awards from libel lawsuits.

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 18 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 19 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Defamation and freedom of speech
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Defamation laws may come into tension with freedom of speech, leading to censorship
effects
Novor
20chilling
2015 06:18AM
where publishers fear lawsuits, or loss of reputation where individuals have no effective
protection
against
Andrew
Gamber
reckless or unfounded allegations. Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights permits
restrictions on freedom of speech which are necessary for the protection of the reputation or the rights of
others[11].
Jurisdictions resolve this tension in different ways, in particular in determining where the burden of proof
lies when unfounded allegations are made. The power of the internet to disseminate comment, which may
include malicious comment, has brought a new focus to the issue. [12]
There is a broader consensus against laws which criminalize defamation. Human rights organizations, and
other organizations such as the Council of Europe and Organization for Security and Co-operation in
Europe, have campaigned against strict defamation laws which criminalize defamation.[13][14] The European
Court of Human Rights has placed restrictions on criminal libel laws because of the freedom
of expression
CI-15-10167
provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. One notable case was Lingens v. Austria (1986).
United States
Main article: United States defamation law
The origins of US defamation law pre-date the American Revolution; one famous 1734 case involving John
Peter Zenger established some precedent that the truth should be an absolute defense against libel
charges. (Previous English defamation law had not provided this guarantee.) Though the First Amendment
of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect freedom of the press, for most of the history of the United
States, the Supreme Court neglected to use it to rule on libel cases. This left libel laws, based upon the
traditional common law of defamation inherited from the English legal system, mixed across the states.
The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, however, dramatically changed the nature of libel law in
the United States by establishing that public officials could win a suit for libel only if they could
demonstrate publishers' "knowledge that the information was false" or that it was published "with reckless
disregard of whether it was false or not". Later Supreme Court cases dismissed the claim for libel and
forbade libel claims for statements that are so ridiculous to be clearly not true, or are involving
opinionated subjects such as one's physical state of being. Recent cases have addressed defamation law
and the internet.
Defamation law in the United States is much less plaintiff-friendly than its counterparts in European and
the Commonwealth countries, due to the enforcement of the First Amendment. In the United States, a
comprehensive discussion of what is and is not libel or slander is difficult, because the definition differs
between different states, and under federal law. Some states codify what constitutes slander and libel
together into the same set of laws. Criminal libel is rare or nonexistent, depending on the state. Defenses
to libel that can result in dismissal before trial include the statement being one of opinion rather than fact
or being "fair comment and criticism". Truth is always a defense.
Most states recognize that some categories of statements are considered to be defamatory per se, such
that people making a defamation claim for these statements do not need to prove that the statement was
defamatory.

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 19 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 20 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS


OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

PROTHONOTARY
CIVIL COVER SHEET
Note: CAO SCHEDULING COVER SHEET MUST BE ATTACHED,
IF AN EVENT NEEDS TO BE SCHEDULED.
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED.
PLEASE LIST NAMES, ADDRESSES AND SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS
OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES ON A SEPARATE SHEET.

CI-15-10167

DO NOT STAPLE THE COVER SHEET TO THE PLEADING ZIP


CODES ARE REQUIRED & INFORMATION MUST MATCH PLEADING
CASE ID:
PLAINTIFF'S NAME
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Pro, Se
ADDRESS:
1250 Fremont St, Lancaster, PA 17603

VS

DEFENDANT 'S NAME


Lancaster Film Commission, et.al.,
ADDRESS:

TELEPHONE #: 717-669-2163

TELEPHONE #:

SSN#200-46-0959

SSN#

TYPE OF ACTION:

Jury Trial Demanded: No


Arbitration: Yes

Name of Firm and Filing Attorney OR Filing Party, Address, Telephone


Number, AOPC Number Firm:
Filing Attorney/Party: Stanley J. Caterbone AOPC #
Address: 1250 Fremont Street,
City: Lancaster
Telephone Number: 717-669-2163
Fax Number:
Signature:

/S/ Stanley J. Caterbone

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 20 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 21 of 198


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page 21 of 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 22 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
scaterbone@live.com
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163

CI-15-10167
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.

For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:

CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission, et.a.,

Page
Page
22 of
1 70

Friday, November 20, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 23 of 198

Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664

CI-15-10167
May 21, 2009
To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.

Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 24 of 198

Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
and ***Electronically
Weapons BillFiled***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

CI-15-10167

2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**

Page 2

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 25 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more actsLANCASTER,
occurring over
PA a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally
protected
***Electronically Filed***
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."

CI-15-10167

For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.

Page 3

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 26 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes
repeated contact
by
***Electronically
Filed***
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person
his 06:18AM
or her
Nov 20at
2015
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone Andrew
call or Gamber
electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.

(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:

CI-15-10167
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court
order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.

Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon


Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
Page 4

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 27 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based,
sea-based,
LANCASTER,
PA or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, ***Electronically
laser, or other energies
Filed***
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information
war,06:18AM
mood
Nov 20 2015
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical
or
biological
Andrew Gamber
agents in the vicinity of a person.

CI-15-10167

Page 5

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 28 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Richmond council passes resolution


supporting ban on space-based
weapons

CI-15-10167

May 20, 2015


FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of

Page 8

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 29 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
dumb ideas, Bates said.
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Gamber
Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behindAndrew
space-based

weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program ofCI-15-10167
1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:

1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based


weapons

2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments

1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!


Page 9

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 30 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167

Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015

I remain,

Stan J. Caterbone

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.

Page 1 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 31 of 198

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP


ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)


Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009

CI-15-10167

Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010

Date Updated:

October 10, 2015

Date Completed:
Date Initiated:

July 28, 2009


July 8, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Page 2 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 32 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again
to 06:18AM
local,
Nov return
20 2015
Andrew
Gamber
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest.

From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary

Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.

The

psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.

By

the

end

of

the

summer

of

2010

every

social

media

site,

including

the

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

CI-15-10167

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.

In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group.

And Again, the

Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.

Since August 1,

2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.

The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct

witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle


Lambert.

In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter

Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate


murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 153400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free

Page 3 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 33 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to LANCASTER,
grant Summary
PA
***Electronically
Filed***
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.

However, this time there was

no

MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions

CI-15-10167

of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.

On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.

The Complaint contained

allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact.

The Lancaster City Police

Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.

The

community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.

Page 4 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 34 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately
LANCASTER, PA45
***Electronically
Filed***
audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range
in date from 1971
to
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P.
Caterbone
and
Andrew
Gamber
Stan J. Caterbone. In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.

Phil interviewed all living

descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am

CI-15-10167

alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.

Page 5 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 35 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
HISTORY
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International
Nov 20 2015 Signal
06:18AM
Andrew
Gamber
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred. After discussions with ISC and United
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.

However, money, power,

influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal
False Claims
CI-15-10167
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.

This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;

personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.

Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad

investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.

This

includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.

ISC was a

Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:

INTERNATIONAL

Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.

James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.

Page 6 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 36 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated
with ISC:
***Electronically
Filed***
Nov 20 2015
06:18AM
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central
Intelligence
Andrew Gamber
Agency (CIA).

Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.

Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.

Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?

Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and


Chair of the
CI-15-10167
Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.

Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.

ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.

In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.

ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.

ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.

On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),


Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James


Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, County.

Page 7 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 37 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of LANCASTER,
Common Pleas),
PA
Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker,
represented James
***Electronically
Filed***
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim
Police
NovTownship
20 2015 06:18AM
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District
Andrew
Gamberof
Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),


Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.

THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP


Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;

CI-15-10167

burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender
liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had
to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape.
uncovered and discovered to this day.

Information and findings are still being

Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury

investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:

Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.

Fabricate a history of mental illness.


Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.

Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,

Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.

When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.

Page 8 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 38 of 198

Change the history of events and the truth.


THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges.

During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least

twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted,
and involved
CI-15-10167
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.

This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.

Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.

Page 9 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 39 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES
ANDPA
LANCASTER,
***Electronically Filed***
WEAPONS.
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations
of fraud
Andrew Gamber
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.

Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and


continuous way
CI-15-10167

without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.

This

assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.

See attached documents for

more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.

Page 10 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 40 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
FAMILY HISTORY
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically
Filed***
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes
something
like
Andrew
Gamber
the following:

Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.

He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and

Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke


and with a severe mental illness.

Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live
in California.
CI-15-10167

Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.

Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.

The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.

Samuel Caterbone,

Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.

Page 11 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 41 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943
to 1946
and
Andrew
Gamber
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.

He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,

owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.

His

viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized

CI-15-10167

stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a

world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.

In 1973 Samuel P.

Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.

The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never

entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.

However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone

wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.

On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an

inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate.

The check was for some $70,000.00.

The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.

He was in perfect

health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,

former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.

Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry

Page 12 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 42 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's
death PA
was
LANCASTER,
***Electronically Filed***
a murder, not natural.
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.

By his own

admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately

CI-15-10167

responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara

Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.

Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending

Lancaster Catholic High School.

After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an

unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November.

While in the woods in

Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.

It left him in the

Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.

The

The Schizophrenia

diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.

Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and

landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.

John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by

James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith

Page 13 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 43 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster
Catholic High
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically
Filed***
School.
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B

CI-15-10167

grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in

computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.

Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first

beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..

Over the

years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.

The same was true of his businesses.

Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a

$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.

The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.

There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and

Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;

every instance of the word

used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as

Page 14 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 44 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008
in CATERBONE
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically
Filed***
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Pennsylvania.
Andrew Gamber

THE PUBLIC RECORD


The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;
Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000
pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary
offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and
several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an

CI-15-10167

exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as

plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local
courts.
There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare
and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate

PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:


www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.freedomffchs.com
https://www.scribd.com

Page 15 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 45 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically
Filed***
** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 Andrew
companies
are
Gamber
using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is
often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.
Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay
secretive for so long.

This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television

drama "Medium" this last season.

On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live

broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.

CI-15-10167

Dated: July 28, 2009


Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
The following are no longer in service:
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Page 16 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 46 of 198


September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com

CI-15-10167
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized
Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.

Page 17 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 47 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.
***Electronically Filed***
Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster
is one
of
Nov 20 2015
06:18AM
the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country.
Lancaster
Andrew Gamber
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration
has a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with
ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &
Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline
regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in
my Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his
relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert
Gates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth
questions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members
CI-15-10167
of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement
with ISC
and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa
and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here a
few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,
Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,
National Security Agency:
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a supersecret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listening
posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA
made sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma
Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in
1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms
to stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify its
efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its
top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the
father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began
regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,
1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, from
January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,
including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal
and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the
agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy
Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of
remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according to
Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),
former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control
industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:

Page 18 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 48 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting
arrangements,
via
***Electronically
Filed***
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation
is
a
big
time
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense
contractor.
Andrew
Gamber
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
CI-15-10167
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.

Page 19 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 49 of 198

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Page 20 of 41

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 50 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
AFFIDAVIT
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20Group,
2015 06:18AM
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management
Ltd.,
Andrew Gamber
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:

I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.

The

CI-15-10167
whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the
very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.

Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.

Page 21 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 51 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 52 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015

ENTERED AND FILED


PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

!" #

CI-15-10167

,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
/
/

#
9
"
"
!
3
,

9
"
!
3
,

#
9
"
!
3
,

/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
/
/

,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
"
"
/ /
"
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ 3/
!
/ 3/
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
/ ,/
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
!/ #/
3
!/ #/
3

$ % &'
$&()*%& (* & +$+
$*(
(+ +%
- ( & .+
+ /0+$-.( 0%/%*$1 2+ $'
,3! $*
3

! "$
$4
1
5
4
/.
/.
, 1 2 6 78 6 (
1
5
4
/.
/.
## 9
6
4 8 1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#
)
6 :1
5
4
/.
/.
#!
6(
:1
5
4
/.
/.
#,
$4 8 ): 2 678 $ ;
* .
< # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 #5
4
/.
/.
3=
# ==
.
6:
12
6 %
10 4
7 > 7
3 = #, " == 9 $4 8 *8
1 @
*8
0 4
7 > 7
3 = ! , == ! 1
(
+
4
0 4
7 >
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
3="
==
(
42
/
& .
> 7
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = !3" == *
A 4 0/* ( @B
(
%
6 :
3=
# == 9/ .
- C
/ 4: *88 %
6 :
3=
! == / *
- 47 : %
6 :
#/ 3 = ! , == # 1
*8
0/%
% 66
! =#
== / .
$ 88
6.
%
6 : % 66
3=
9(
/* 4
7& 8
3/ 9/
" D9!!
#
3 = , 3 ==
; ( / 66/& *88 0
3/ 9/
" D9!!
% 66
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = #! 9 ==
6
.
3/ 9/
" % 66
! = #3
== E .2+F
+
/+
8.
8 6: % 66
$(
3# 1 3 .
2
:
:6
6
$(
3# 1 3 .2+ 4
:
.*$
6
8 6
:

Page 23 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

?
?
?
?

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 53 of 198

)6
G!
(&. G

++ /

,3! - ( & .+
+
*2$-&(% (& +*%

6+ 8

&$-+
&

6& 4
8

&. *2$ * ! - ( &.


* + & - ( & .+
+

6(

Monday, November 23, 2015

ENTERED AND FILED


PROTHONOTARYS
&. *( *A&($2(%&.
*%
& OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
6 : > ,3#?
Andrew Gamber

*% +.&( $+*%

>& 4

? !1

!"
#

CI-15-10167

# (

%
= 3#

(
*(
+
!(

&'
9
@

'

8 62

9
#

= 3#

8
'

(
*(
!( ,
-(
.(
"(
-

!( 3

*B

66 : >

,,9?

88B

> ,,"? /
1

( 2
*( 3

'

#
,

,
4

Page 24 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 54 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically
Filed***
scaterbone@live.com
Nov
20
2015
06:18AM
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Andrew Gamber
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST CI-15-10167


STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
September 27, 2015
Work-In-Progress

Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.

1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of


2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.

Page 25 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 55 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically
Filed***
14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice
Nov
20
2015
06:18AM
15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Andrew Gamber
Formal Notice

16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
20. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police
Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,
Debra Hoeckler
21.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
CI-15-10167
with no reason and no written notice.
22.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
23.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
24.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain
regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.

Dated: September 27, 2015

Page 26 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 56 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Page 27 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 57 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Page 28 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 58 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Page 29 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 59 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
AFFIDAVIT
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
I, Stanley J. Caterbone, Targeted Individual or TI, residing at: 1250 Fremont Street,
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17603, do hereby state that I am at least 18 years of age, that I am
a citizen or a legal resident of the United States of America, that I am of sound mind, and that I
am the person whose signature follows on this Affidavit. The purpose of this document is (1) to
advise Congress as well as state and local officials of organized stalking and electronic and mind
manipulation torture being committed against me and (2) to request a state, local, or
Congressional investigation and hearing on the use of remotely-operated directed energy attacks
and mind control technologies on Americans in this country.

Our Government is responsible for protecting its citizens from elements that
covertly harass, torment, murder, and cause victims to commit suicide through
organized stalking and remote electronic torture. Yet, unbiased research indicates that
CI-15-10167
certain elements of Government either engage in these activities or protect those who perform
them. I seek the complete dismantling of any officially-sanctioned covert Government torture
programs, the passage of legislation specifically outlawing that high-tech torture, and the full
prosecution of any person, regardless of his rank or position, who has violated my civil rights and
my most basic human rights. The assaults on my mind and body have been occurring for 24
year(s) and include, but are not limited to the following victimization's:

1.

Blanketing my dwelling and surroundings with electromagnetic energy.


Bombarding my body with debilitating electronic and mind manipulation effects.
Directed Energy Weapons Causing Severe Pain to Body and Brain. Began in at least 2005
and still continuing, with complaints to Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance, FFCHS
in 2009, and in cited in various state and federal court cases over the past several years.
Attacks causing severe artificial pain most likely from Directed Energy Devices synchronized with
telepathic harassment and organized stalking and harassment have been logged and reported to
law enforcement and medical professionals since 2008.
Prior to 2008 the attacks were
experienced and reported to medical professionals but the sources were not known. Also reported
attacks of pain to a family physician, emergency room personnel and psychiatrists.

2.
Invading my thoughts via remote sensing technologies. Was sent an autonomous
email in 1998 introducing the term remote viewing. Various technologies and tactics are being
used to create emotional signatures that induce various emotional states; a systematic complete
hacking of my mind.
3.

Making me mentally hear others' voices through the microwave hearing effect.
Synthetic and/or Mental Telepathy. First started to experience telepathy/synthetic telepathy
in 2005 with full-time 24/7 connection during the same time to present. When full-time telepathy
started a male conducted interrogations lasting several hours at a time concerning a wealth of
subjects including ISC/CIA Knowledge. Cannot disconnect from continuous conversations at all
times with one female person. The handlers know everything I know and experience in real time.
During 2006 and 2007 have been telepathic with some 10 or more persons, both male and female
for short durations. Can recall most conversations and subject matter with identities of who they
said they were. Interrogation type harassment is still being used telepathically to harass and for
some sleep deprivation. Made first complaints to DARPA, the FBI, and U.S. Senator Arlen Specter
in 2007. Some conversations by the persons that are telepathic with me elude to some program
similar to the DARPA datalog program where they record your entire life. Everything that you try
to do on a daily basis is subject matter for conversation and harassment. Interference with
thought, harassment, and interrogation is used often times with electromagnetic weapon attacks
to the brain or body.

Page 30 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 60 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
4.
Depriving me of sleep due to neurological intervention. Mostly
Experienced Sleep
***Electronically
Filed***
Deprivation Techniques during periods of time in 2008 to 2010. Mostly with attacks
pain06:18AM
from
Nov 20of
2015
Directed Energy Weapons to back, neck, head (brain); and heart on a few occasions;
and with
Andrew Gamber
harassment from telepathy.

5.

Introducing poisonous gas and radiation toxins into my home. First experienced
toxic gases (Chloroform?) in heavy doses in 2006-2007. Made complaints to the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Southern Regional Police. Experienced attacks that would cause
dizziness at home, in automobile and in public. Was informed it was being released through a
distribution system the size of fishing line. To counter attacks used cotton in nostrils and gas
mask. In 2009 experienced attacks of what is said to be sleeping gas, when attacked could not
open eyes. Took Pictures during some attacks.

6.
Having me stalked en masse on foot and in vehicles. vandalizing my home and/or
car. Gang Stalking or Organized Stalking began in 1987 and continues today.
It includes
CI-15-10167
strangers using gestures such as finger under eye; various forms of harassment; and public
mobbing. Complaints have been filed in 1987; 1992;1998 and 2005 to 2010. Complaints were
made to various public officials and local, state, and federal agencies as mental duress. The terms
organized stalking, gang stalking, targeted individual, etc., was not learned until a few years ago.
The organized stalking and harassment followed in several states, some while traveling from
Lancaster, Pennsylvania to California. Tracking technologies may have been used and most likely
are still being used. Police were involved in most places.
7.

Tapping (Bugging) my phones. Complaints of phone tapping/tampering were made to


New Jersey Bell in 1987 with a service call to Stone Harbor, New Jersey to check lines and phones.
The same was done by a Bell Atlantic repairman in Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1998. In 2004 a
complaint with a report number was filed with the Pennsylvania Attorney General Office in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Agent Amy Zelnick) regarding interference with phone calls and
impersonations by perps intercepting and rerouting calls. Computer Hacking complaints were filed
to local authorities in the County of Lancaster and the Cyber Crime unit of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation in 2005 to 2010.

8.
Blacklisting me in the labor market. Filed complains of employment discrimination with
the Pennsylvania Attorney General in 2006 and the Lancaster County Human Relations
Commission in 2008.
9.

Workplace mobbing. Experienced in 1987 at Financial Management Group, Ltd.,


American Helix of High Industries in 1991 and Pflumm Contractors, Inc., in 1997/1998. Filed
complaints and logs as mental duress and harassment. Was forced out of all 3 organizations as a
result of the mobbing and harassment.

10. Public Mobbing. Public type mobbing and organized stalking and harassment was
perpetrated heavily in the years 2005 to 2010 in the following places: The Lancaster County
Courthouse, The Lancaster County Public Library, the Pennsylvania Career Link, and the Millersville
University Library and University Offices. I was given suspicious and illegal No Trespass Notices
in some 18 public places in Lancaster County in the years 2005 to 2009 without just cause. I was
complaining of stalking and harassing in most all of those public places. The Lancaster County
Public Library and the Millersville University took away my access to a computer after my personal
computers were vandalized and/or hacked inoperable. Fulton Bank took away my safe deposit
box. Others included my church of worship, various bars and restaurants and one attorneys office.
Complaints have been filed regarding the same in courts and with various authorities.

Page 31 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 61 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
11. Attempted Murder. Experienced with an attempt of vehicular homicide
in 1991 Filed***
after
***Electronically
National News Media reported ISC/CIA-NSA connection of Arms to Irag. TheNov
incident
involved
a
20 2015
06:18AM
vehicle changing lanes and direction and heading directly toward me in theAndrew
wrong Gamber
direction
running me off the road, narrowly missing a tree. I Filed the incident in federal courts and used
as a motion to seal federal case no. 05-2288 in 2005 in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

12.

Pet Killing. Cat was killed in 2005 with complaints to the Lancaster County Humane
Shelter and the Southern Regional Police Department.

13.

Illegal Entries of Home/Properties. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then
again in 1991; 1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance
claims, most with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania , State
Farm and Harleysville Insurance Companies.

CI-15-10167

14.

Illegal Repossessions.
Airplane in 1987 containing legal and business files.
Home/Property and Contents in 2006 also containing legal and business files and documents.

15.

Physical Assaults. One attack and filed complaint with police report in Los Osos California
in 2005 and one in the City of Lancaster. Police reports were filed and obtained for both.

16. False Arrests. Experienced 7 in 1987 and more than 20 in 2005 and 2006 in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The false arrests were
charges that were all dismissed prior to court hearings.
17. False Imprisonments. Spent 7 to 10 days in Lancaster County Prison in 1987 with all
charges dismissed and again for some 60 days in 2006 with all charges dismissed. The 60 Days of
imprisonment of 2006 was triggered with a false report of missing a bail supervision meeting,
which was confirmed to be false in court; however bail was maliciously and purposefully reinstated
as secured instead of unsecured. The appropriate appeal was filed which secured my release after
some 60 days of false imprisonment. There were no charges that resulted in any convictions.
18.

Psychiatric Abuses with False Suicide Allegations from Perpetrators/Stalkers. One


in 1987 resulting in a forced hospitalization for several hours by police in Stone Harbor, New
Jersey. And one again in February of 2005 resulting in police restraining me in my home and
abusing me. This one was a fraudulent and phony email sent to police by a perp. The Southern
Regional Police had to vacate after the email was proven to be a fraud.

19. Vandalism to Property. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then again in 1991;
1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance claims, most
with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania and Harleysville
Insurance Company. 3 computers have been rendered inoperable since 2005 along with various
electronics equipment; dvd recorders; printers; household items; appliances; etc., Most insurance
claims have been paid. In the past years a wave of purchased items, online and in stores, were
received broken or the wrong item and all had to be returned. Some included items to secure my
property, and others included computer related items, others were household and clothing items.
20. Gas Lighting. The illegal entering of home and causing psychological duress by moving
items and or hiding items. First reported in 1998 to the Conestoga Police and continued to
present. Clothing was also manipulated and altered. The term gas lighting was only learned in
2010, although it was reported to police as harassment by neighbors of friends. The daily draining
of my hot tub was also used as a psychological warfare tactic and used to run up utility bills.
Numerous complaints were made to police in 2008 to 2010.

Page 32 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 62 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
21. Thefts of Property. Not Yet Completed.
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
22. Vandalism to Car/Truck. Since 2005 have experienced years of gas siphoning,
battery
Andrew Gamber
outages, letting air out of tires, and wetting of inside of floor mats as psychological warfare tactics
by perps and stalkers. Made numerous complaints the Lancaster City Police Department.

23.

Toxic Chemical Causing Running Nose. Experienced on regular basis in 2009 when in
public places. Was not in conjunction with cold/flu symptoms. Research states it is a tactic used
in organized stalking.

24.

Computer Hacking. Computer Hacking complaints were filed to local authorities in the
County of Lancaster and the Cyber Crime unit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2005 to
2010. Numerous complaint numbers have been secured. Complaints of cell phone hacking was
also reported in 2010. Websites and blogs were regularly hacked and sometimes taken off-line.
Electronic calenders, court documents, and financial records were often hacked
causing many
CI-15-10167
problems of the years, including having to withdraw civil complaints.

25. Cyber Stalking. Most in 2005 to 2010.


Message Board, and the FBI Cyber Crime Unit.

Complaints to Microsoft legal counsel, Yahoo

26.

Interference/Delay/Theft of U.S. Mails. First reported to U.S. Postmaster of mail


tampering and illegal changing of address in 1987. In 2008 to 2009 have made several more
complaints to the U.S. Postmaster Inspector General who claim to have begun investigations.
Some caused missed court hearings and other missed appointments and or meetings.

27.

Electromagnetic Weapons Causing Severe Muscle Spasms/Cramps.


First
experienced in 2006 to present. One experience in 2006 was while I was in my hot tub and the
pain and cramp was so severe in my left calf muscle (you automatically bend over to rub it out,
which placed my head underwater) I had to crawl out of the hot tub before almost drowning.

28.

Electromagnetic Weapons Causing Sexual Stimulation. First experienced in 2005.

29. Forced Hospitalizations. Forced Hospitalizations in 1987 (2) one for 6 hours and one for
5 days; 2006 one for 3 days; 2009 one for several hours while in intensive care for emergency
surgery; and 2010 one for 8 days. Filed complaints to Citizens Commission for Human Rights in
1991 and 2008.
30.

Manipulation and Theft of Documents. Numerous thefts and manipulation of all legal
and business documents both in paper and in electronic format have occurred since 1987.
Microfiche/Microfilming began in 1987 and other measures to secure documents have been
ongoing to present. Numerous complaints have been filed with law enforcement since 1987.

Page 33 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 63 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Statement: I have been a Targeted Individual, TI, and Victim since 1987. InLANCASTER,
1987 I blewPA
the
whistle (public Allegations and Complaints to State and Federal Authorities of
Fraud
during
merger
***Electronically Filed***
negotiations with British Defense Contractor Ferranti International) on an international
Nov 20 2015defense
06:18AM
contractor named International Signal & Control, or ISC, who was selling arms Andrew
(Everything
from
Gamber
Telemetry Systems to Cluster Bombs) to Iraq via South Africa and was convicted of a $1 Billion
dollar Fraud in 1992 by the United States Attorney and several other federal agencies. See
ABC/News 20/20 and Nightline in 1991. They were founded and headquartered in my hometown
of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I was a shareholder and was solicited by a top ISC Executives
(Convicted as a Mastermind of the Billion Dollar Fraud) to help finance some of their operations
through an affiliate called United Chem Con. ISC was a Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor
and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies since it's beginnings in the early 1970's.
One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade,
Maryland. Former Secretary of the Navy, Bobby Ray Inman was on the Board of Directors of ISC
and was also on the Board of Directors of Science Applications International Corporation, or SAIC.
SAIC was a huge defense contractor that was the recipient of the Defense Intelligence Agency, or
DIA, program on Remote Viewing, which SAIC named Project Stargate. It was reported that
Bobby Ray Inman declined the nomination for Secretary of Defense underCI-15-10167
the first Clinton
Administration because of the ISC and Trecor scandals. In the early 1990's I was a subcontractor
on a project for the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, or DARPA, with the National
Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST called TIMIT.
The project developed speech
corpora for the development of computer based speech recognition systems. I was also involved
in the bidding of other Department of Defense contracts dealing with information technologies. In
1998 I was stalked and approached by an employee of the National Security Agency, or NSA in
York, Pennsylvania who said my problems were not with the NSA, but the good ole boys. In
2005 I was detained by 2 Defense Intelligence Agency, or DIA officers in a museum on a military
base in Austin, Texas and was questioned and interviewed regarding my civil actions filed in
federal court for several hours. I was released and told to stay off of all military bases. My
brother, a Family Physician in Austin Texas had to verify my travel plans and the fact that I was
staying with him prior to my release.
My father alleged he was part of U.S. Navy experiments in the 1940's and experienced
synthetic telepathy in the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's as outlined in memos and documents he had
authored; and from my personal conversations with him prior to his death. Ms. Amy Fuchs of the
Disclosure Project confirmed that he was most likely given an ET experience via synthetic
telepathy. He died in 2001 in New York City of cancer. My brother was in the U.S. Air Force in the
late 1960's and I allege was a victim of the LSD experiments relating to MKULTRA in the late
1960's and a victim of murder (Suspicious Suicide with tainted medical reports) in Santa Barbara
California in 1984; Notarized Complaints were filed to the California Attorney General in 1991. He
made a declaration type statement prior to his death that he got bad LSD while in the U.S. Air
Force.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. As far back as the late 1980's I thought that my mind was being read, or "remotely
viewed". During the times that legal Counsel and attorneys were solicited in 1987, 1991, and
1997 Organized Stalking and Harassment and other forms of attacks experienced by Targeted
Individuals were severely increased. In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an allout assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of
directed energy devices and/or electromagnetic weapons. This assault was no coincidence in that
it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, of CATERBONE v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This targeting has ruined every aspect of my life.

Page 34 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 64 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
Some Perspectives
***Electronically Filed***
The calculated and technological entry into another persons mind is an act of
monumental
barNov
20 2015 06:18AM
barism which obliterates perhaps with the twiddling of a dial the history and
civilization
Andrew
Gamberof
mans mental development. It is more than an abuse of human rights, it is the destruction of
meaning. For anyone who is forced into the hell of living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort
to stay sane is beyond the scope of tolerable endurance. The imaginative capacity of the ordinary
mind cannot encompass the horror of it. We have attempted to come to terms with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration camps. We now have the prospect of systematic control authorized by men who issue instructions through satellite communications for the destruction of
societies while they are driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and going to the opera.
"On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive
Technology"by Carole Smith
Global Research, October 18, 2007; Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003.
People have no comprehension of how lethal only one aspect (aside from the obvious of driving
CI-15-10167
the victim completely insane) of telepathy technology can be in disrupting and ruining an individual's life through the sabotaging of his/her daily activities. Everything an individual does begins
with a momentary thought. From the split second that thought is learned by the person on the
other end (telepathically) - the individual's right to privacy is not the real threat or loss. The real
lethal weapon is the advantage in disrupting or preventing the individual from accomplishing
whatever he/she is going to do before they actually do it. With a simple cell phone call or instant
message, the Advanced Team is in place to subvert; sabotage; manipulate; propagandize;
smear; disrupt; or even prevent the task or activity from being accomplished in any successful
manner. The perps are skilled at creating scenarios that are covertly arranged to simulate everyday occurrences to make the victim at fault for the loss or failure. Imagine the consequences
when these activities have legal and financial implications. With telepathy technology the need for
tracking and surveillance technology is greatly diminished and may even become obsolete. This is
not merely Mind Invasive Technology, as Carole Smith so eloquently wrote this is LIFE Invasive Technology. Say Goodbye to any true sense of capitalism and free enterprise in the not to
distant future unless of course someone stops these illegal and disastrous technology transfers
and leaks.
Stan J. Caterbone
Organized or Gang Stalking
A system of organized psychological terror tactics used against a person who has become an enemy of an individual or a government. Subtle but effective techniques of stalking by multiple individuals and psychological intimidation and manipulation are used to slowly but surely drive the
target to make complaints to authorities who will see the complaints as bogus because of the
methods used against the target. As a result, the target gets labeled as mentally ill.
There are as many stalking tactics as there are targets as the multistalkers will tailor the stalking
to the individuals habits and individual personality. Some common examples or organized stalking
are: following the target on foot, by car and public transportation, crowding the target's space in a
public place, murmuring insults under the breath so only the target can hear, sitting in the car
outside the target's residence, starting "fights" in public with the target, doing "skits" on the
street which involves information only the target should know but has been found out via surveillance of the target, stealing and vandalism of the target's possessions.
Organized Stalking Website
Organized Stalking is a form of terrorism used against an individual in a malicious attempt to
reduce the quality of a persons life so they will: have a nervous break-down, become incarcerated, institutionalized, experience constant mental, emotional, or physical pain, become homeless, and/or commit suicide. This is done using well-orchestrated accusations, lies, rumors, bogus
investigations, setups, framings, intimidation, overt or covert threats, vandalism, thefts, sabotage, torture, humiliation, emotional terror and general harassment. It is a ganging up by members of the community who follow an organizer and participate in a systematic terrorizing of an
individual. Mark M. Rich

Page 35 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 65 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
The acts described above violate many laws aimed at protecting Americans. Some
of these laws
LANCASTER,
PA
include but are not limited to the following:
***Electronically Filed***
10 USC 921, Article 121 -- Larceny and wrongful appropriation
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
10 USC 920A, Article 120a -- Stalking
Andrew Gamber
18 2340 USC -- Torture
18 USC 241 -- Conspiracy against rights of sovereign, free, God created, spirit and soul
beings
18 USC 213 -- Illegal Surreptitious entry
18 USC 242 -- Deprivation of rights under color of law
18 USC 35 -- Imparting or conveying false information
18 USC 1117 -- Conspiracy to Murder
18 USC 1111 -- Murder
18 USC 1905 -- Disclosure of information generally
42 USC 1983 -- Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 USC 1985 -- Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
31 USC 5328 -- Whistleblower protections
CI-15-10167
18 USC 1512 -- Engaging in misleading conduct
18 USC 1503 -- Intimidating a witness/victim
18 USC 1512 -- Tampering with a witness/victim
18 USC 1513 -- Retaliation against a witness/victim
18 USC 1510 -- Obstructing a criminal investigation, conflict of interest roles in
government
18 USC 1509 -- Impeding due exercise of rights by attempting to prevent, obstruct,
impede and Interfere with same
18 USC 1622 -- Subordination of perjury by procuring another to commit perjury
(Optional) I have attached a personal message _______ (check).

AFFIRMATION
I affirm that the statements in this Affidavit concerning my torture and the results of
that torture are true and correct. I further affirm that those statements are based on
my own direct knowledge, personal experience, research, and known and published
historical fact.

Stan J. Caterbone
Affiant (signature) ______________________________________
Stan J. Caterbone
Name (print): __________________________________________
June 19, 2015
Date: _________________________________________________
Pennsylvania
State of __________________________
County of
Lancaster
_____________________________
19
15
June
Sworn before me this _______
day of _______________________,
20__
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98
________________________________,
Notary Public Exp.:
______________________
SJC
Stamp
& Seal:

Don't Know When

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance. All rights reserved. Copyright 2010 (This is an amended
form of the original Affidavit of September 2010 from Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance.)

Page 36 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 66 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Page 37 of 41
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 35 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015


06/10/2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 67 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Page 38 of 41
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 36 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015


06/10/2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 68 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Page 39 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 69 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Page 40 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 70 of 198

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Page 41 of 41

Saturday, October 10, 2015

Lancaster Film Commission


CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 71 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 15 of 142

1 of 1

http://lancasterfilmcommission.com/
Monday, November 23, 2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew
Gamber
Jay Ingram
- Executive
Director

Home

About Us

Services

Gallery

CI-15-10167

Contact Us

The Lancaster Film Commission is a non-profit organization of artists and art


patrons who dedicate themselves to the promotion and expansion of film,
television and video production in the Greater Lancaster, Pennsylvania area. In
cooperation with the State of Pennsylvania Film Commission and the other local
film commissions in the Southeastern section of our state we will develop a solid
rapport with production companies in this area and the major film making cities on
both coasts. With the goal of bringing productions into Lancaster we will offer all
needed services i.e. scouting, permits, names and contact information of local
professionals, including production individuals and companies, plus talent
libraries. We will have updated databases listing businesses which support
productions by offering reduced rates and percentage discounts. We are a service
organization.
Our second goal is community goodwill. We will work to enhance the
entertainment and community relations and strive to unite them in a productive
capacity which will benefit all.
Thirdly we will support and encourage Independent productions, with contests and
festivals which will include film and video grants. There will also be a yearly Film
Festival, each October, which will include film and video projects (major and
minor) with celebrity presenters and participants.

2006 Lancaster Film Commission. All rights reserved.

10/7/2006 4:08 PM

Lancaster Film Commission


CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 72 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 16 of 142

1 of 1

http://lancasterfilmcommission.com/about.cfm
Monday, November 23, 2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew
Gamber
Jay Ingram
- Executive
Director

Home

About Us

Services

Gallery

CI-15-10167

Contact Us

The Lancaster Film Commission will attract and assist film and digital productions.
The film industry generates over $30 billion outside the Los Angeles area and
production companies are always searching for new and supportive areas to set
up shop. LFC will also push for involvement by local businesses and the local film
and video professionals who would like to extend their credits. The positive impact
on Lancaster will be financially as well as artistically strong.

THE LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION IS


Jay Ingram - Executive Director
James Manley - Projects Coordinator & Media Manager
HONORARY BOARD MEMBERS
Senator Gibson Armstrong
Charles Smithgall
Glenn Robinson
Larry Alexander
Michael O'Day
Brad Hepfer
Timothy Marsden
Left to right are Jay Ingram, Charlie
Smithgall and Senator Gib Armstrong

2006 Lancaster Film Commission. All rights reserved.

10/7/2006 4:06 PM

Lancaster Film Commission


CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 73 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 17 of 142

1 of 1

http://lancasterfilmcommission.com/services.cfm
Monday, November 23, 2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew
Gamber
Jay Ingram
- Executive
Director

Home

About Us

Services

Gallery

CI-15-10167

Contact Us

The Lancaster Film Commission offers assistance in many areas, including:


Handling and channeling of all city department requests
Communication with local businesses
Free production guide
Licensing aide and information
Labor relations
Location scouting and photo files
Website with all up-to-the-minute film news
24-hour database hotline
Film intern program
Organization of premieres of local films
Film writing competition
Film Festivals
Community relations
Youth program
LFC support tournaments
Sponsored student film projects

2006 Lancaster Film Commission. All rights reserved.

10/7/2006 4:07 PM

Lancaster Film Commission


CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 74 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 18 of 142

1 of 2

http://lancasterfilmcommission.com/gallery.cfm
Monday, November 23, 2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew
Gamber
Jay Ingram
- Executive
Director

Home

About Us

Services

Gallery

CI-15-10167

Contact Us

Virtual Location Tours


These are a sampling of locations in the Lancaster area, viewable in 360 degree QuickTime virtual reality panoramas.
Click on any image below to see samples. If you need QuickTime go here. Additional scouting locations can use this
technique through Fulmedia Interactive.

Countryside
Lancaster's Amish Country

Downtown Lancaster
Various locations in downtown lancaster.

10/7/2006 4:08 PM

Lancaster Film Commission


CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 75 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 19 of 142

2 of 2

http://lancasterfilmcommission.com/gallery.cfm
Monday, November 23, 2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
film festival
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
the first annual lancater film commission film festival will be held dec. 2, 2006.
all categories are accepted - short films, long films, documentaries, etc. Fees are 25 dollars Nov
per film.
check
and
20Send
2015
06:18AM
dvd to lancaster film commission - 3714 nolt road -lalndisville - PA - 17538
Andrew Gamber

2006 Lancaster Film Commission. All rights reserved.

CI-15-10167

10/7/2006 4:08 PM

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 76 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 20 of 142

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Lancaster Film Commission works to reel in


productions
By Olenchek, Christina
Publication: Central Penn Business Journal
Date: Friday, May 12 2006
Subject: Economic development
You are viewing page 1

Jay Ingram was already lending his writing, producing and acting skills to the movie "Rave On" when filming
arrived in Lancaster in late 2004. He soon discovered that there would be more to do as he tried to make sure
things went smoothly for the cast and crew.

CI-15-10167

"I had to do everything," said Ingram, a Hollywood veteran whose career includes stints on television shows
such as "LA Law," "Magnum,
Ads by Google
TV Commercial Production
Experienced Producers, Here 24/7Call Studio Center for your project
StudioCenter.com
Creative Media Production
ROI w.Effective, Dynamic MultimediaNational Top 100 Production Team
www.mazurmediacom.com
S.R. Film & Video Prod.
:30 Spots, Corporate, MarketingDVD/CD Copies, Film Transfer
www.SR-Pro.com
P.I." and "Another World. " 'I had to find caterers. I had to find lodging."
What Lancaster needed, Ingram told then-Mayor Charlie Smithgall, was a film commission to help attract
productions to the area and help people working on those productions connect with local businesses. Smithgall
agreed, and the Lancaster Film Commission was formed in August 2005, with Ingram as its director.
The nonprofit group has spurred about $1 million of economic activity through the projects it has been able to
attract during the past nine months, Ingram said. These projects include an episode of "Dateline NBC" and a
photo shoot featuring fashion photographer Peter Lindbergh. Ingram believes bringing in more projects could
provide many opportunities for businesses in the Lancaster area.
"We have a chance of making this community a place where a lot of films are made," he said.
Despite his organization's aim, Ingram's job is not necessarily a glamorous one. He is the commission's only
employee, running the organization out of his home in East Hempfield Township. He spends his time
connecting production companies coming to Lancaster with caterers, car-rental businesses and hotels willing to
provide discounts. He takes pictures around the county to send to people interested in the area. He spends many
hours on the phone.
"It's a sales job," he said.

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 77 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 21 of 142

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
So far, about $35,000 has been poured into the commission's work. Some of that money has
come fromPA
Ingram
LANCASTER,
himself, while other funds have come from the Pennsylvania Department of Community
and EconomicFiled***
***Electronically
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Development.
Andrew Gamber

Ingram wants to build on the past support the community has shown for the movie business, support forged
when the Harrison Ford movie "Witness" was partially filmed in Lancaster County in the early 1980s. Lancaster
has a variety of environments - old houses, new houses, urban areas, rural areas - that could attract film,
television and video productions, Ingram said. It is close to major metropolitan areas like New York City and
Philadelphia, too.
Distinctive Affairs Catering in Lancaster provided breakfast and lunch for the Lindbergh photo shoot. The
experience was an enjoyable one for the company, manager Brenda Hess said.
"It went well. They were very nice," she said. "If they would call again, we would help them out."

CI-15-10167

The commisson's efforts could mean more opportunities for college students to gain valuable work experience
in Lancaster County, said Dirk Eitzen, head of the film and media-studies program at Franklin Marshall College
in Lancaster. Many of the students at F&M and other institutions are looking for internships and ways to help
out with productions.
"If (the commission) succeeds, of course it's beneficial for students," Eitzen said. "There are eager students
here."
More people are becoming aware of the economic benefits that film and television projects bring to the state,
said Jane Saul, director of the Pennsylvania Film Office. Such projects generated $249 million in business
activity in 2005, according to statistics from the Harrisburgbased office.
While Philadelphia and Pittsburgh continue to attract the bulk of productions, some smaller areas are joining
Lancaster and forming film commissions. There is a film office in Scranton, as well as one that covers the
Pocono Mountains region. Regional offices offer production companies links to local businesses that the state
sometimes cannot provide, Saul said.
"Having regional offices is something that we welcome, she said. "It's a great help."
Ingram predicts big things for the Lancaster Film Commission. Several film productions expected to come to
the Lancaster area could provide between $5 million and $12 million in additional economic activity during the
summer, he said. Any businesses interested in becoming part of a database of companies willing to assist the
commission can e-mail Ingram at lfc1@comcast.net.
Bright lights, little cities
Parts of several movies have been filmed in the midstate. Movies, followed by their Central Pennsylvania
filming locations, include:
"Rough Cut" Harrisburg, Lancaster
"Girl, Interrupted" Harrisburg, Hanover, Cumberland County
"The Altoona Riding Club" Lancaster, Lebanon and Franklin counties
"Lucky Numbers" Harrisburg

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 78 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 22 of 142

"8 Millimeter" Harrisburg

"For Richer or Poorer" York County

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

"Major League II" Harrisburg


"Gettysburg" Gettysburg, Adams County
"Mannequin" Harrisburg
"Witness" Lancaster County
SOURCE: PENNSYLVANIA FILM OFFICE
Despite his organization's aim, Ingram's job is not necessarily a glamorous one. He is theCI-15-10167
commission's only
employee, running the organization out of his home in East Hempfield Township. He spends his time
connecting production companies coming to Lancaster with caterers, car-rental businesses and hotels willing to
provide discounts. He takes pictures around the county to send to people interested in the area. He spends many
hours on the phone.
"It's a sales job," he said.
So far, about $35,000 has been poured into the commission's work. Some of that money has come from Ingram
himself, while other funds have come from the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic
Development.
Ingram wants to build on the past support the community has shown for the movie business, support forged
when the Harrison Ford movie "Witness" was partially filmed in Lancaster County in the early 1980s. Lancaster
has a variety of environments - old houses, new houses, urban areas, rural areas - that could attract film,
television and video productions, Ingram said. It is close to major metropolitan areas like New York City and
Philadelphia, too.
Distinctive Affairs Catering in Lancaster provided breakfast and lunch for the Lindbergh photo shoot. The
experience was an enjoyable one for the company, manager Brenda Hess said.
"It went well. They were very nice," she said. "If they would call again, we would help them out."
The commisson's efforts could mean more opportunities for college students to gain valuable work experience
in Lancaster County, said Dirk Eitzen, head of the film and media-studies program at Franklin Marshall College
in Lancaster. Many of the students at F&M and other institutions are looking for internships and ways to help
out with productions.
Jay Ingram was already lending his writing, producing and acting skills to the movie "Rave On" when filming
arrived in Lancaster in late 2004. He soon discovered that there would be more to do as he tried to make sure
things went smoothly for the cast and crew.
"I had to do everything," said Ingram, a Hollywood veteran whose career includes stints on television shows
such as "LA Law," "Magnum,
Ads by Google

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 79 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 23 of 142

TV Commercial Production
Experienced Producers, Here 24/7Call Studio Center for your project
StudioCenter.com

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Creative Media Production


ROI w.Effective, Dynamic MultimediaNational Top 100 Production Team
www.mazurmediacom.com
S.R. Film & Video Prod.
:30 Spots, Corporate, MarketingDVD/CD Copies, Film Transfer
www.SR-Pro.com
P.I." and "Another World. " 'I had to find caterers. I had to find lodging."

CI-15-10167

What Lancaster needed, Ingram told then-Mayor Charlie Smithgall, was a film commission to help attract
productions to the area and help people working on those productions connect with local businesses. Smithgall
agreed, and the Lancaster Film Commission was formed in August 2005, with Ingram as its director.
The nonprofit group has spurred about $1 million of economic activity through the projects it has been able to
attract during the past nine months, Ingram said. These projects include an episode of "Dateline NBC" and a
photo shoot featuring fashion photographer Peter Lindbergh. Ingram believes bringing in more projects could
provide many opportunities for businesses in the Lancaster area.
"We have a chance of making this community a place where a lot of films are made," he said.
Despite his organization's aim, Ingram's job is not necessarily a glamorous one. He is the commission's only
employee, running the organization out of his home in East Hempfield Township. He spends his time
connecting production companies coming to Lancaster with caterers, car-rental businesses and hotels willing to
provide discounts. He takes pictures around the county to send to people interested in the area. He spends many
hours on the phone.
"It's a sales job," he said.
So far, about $35,000 has been poured into the commission's work. Some of that money has come from Ingram
himself, while other funds have come from the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic
Development.
Ingram wants to build on the past support the community has shown for the movie business, support forged
when the Harrison Ford movie "Witness" was partially filmed in Lancaster County in the early 1980s. Lancaster
has a variety of environments - old houses, new houses, urban areas, rural areas - that could attract film,
television and video productions, Ingram said. It is close to major metropolitan areas like New York City and
Philadelphia, too.
Distinctive Affairs Catering in Lancaster provided breakfast and lunch for the Lindbergh photo shoot. The
experience was an enjoyable one for the company, manager Brenda Hess said.
"It went well. They were very nice," she said. "If they would call again, we would help them out."
The commisson's efforts could mean more opportunities for college students to gain valuable work experience
in Lancaster County, said Dirk Eitzen, head of the film and media-studies program at Franklin Marshall College

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 80 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 24 of 142

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
in Lancaster. Many of the students at F&M and other institutions are looking for internships
and ways to
LANCASTER,
PAhelp
out with productions.
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew
"If (the commission) succeeds, of course it's beneficial for students," Eitzen said. "There are
eager Gamber
students

here."
More people are becoming aware of the economic benefits that film and television projects bring to the state,
said Jane Saul, director of the Pennsylvania Film Office. Such projects generated $249 million in business
activity in 2005, according to statistics from the Harrisburgbased office.
While Philadelphia and Pittsburgh continue to attract the bulk of productions, some smaller areas are joining
Lancaster and forming film commissions. There is a film office in Scranton, as well as one that covers the
Pocono Mountains region. Regional offices offer production companies links to local businesses that the state
sometimes cannot provide, Saul said.

CI-15-10167

"Having regional offices is something that we welcome, she said. "It's a great help."
Ingram predicts big things for the Lancaster Film Commission. Several film productions expected to come to
the Lancaster area could provide between $5 million and $12 million in additional economic activity during the
summer, he said. Any businesses interested in becoming part of a database of companies willing to assist the
commission can e-mail Ingram at lfc1@comcast.net.
Bright lights, little cities
Parts of several movies have been filmed in the midstate. Movies, followed by their Central Pennsylvania
filming locations, include:
"Rough Cut" Harrisburg, Lancaster
"Girl, Interrupted" Harrisburg, Hanover, Cumberland County
"The Altoona Riding Club" Lancaster, Lebanon and Franklin counties
"Lucky Numbers" Harrisburg
"8 Millimeter" Harrisburg
"For Richer or Poorer" York County
"Major League II" Harrisburg
"Gettysburg" Gettysburg, Adams County
"Mannequin" Harrisburg
"Witness" Lancaster County
SOURCE: PENNSYLVANIA FILM OFFICE

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 81 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 25 of 142

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 82 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 26 of 142

RE: Iformation of Master Training Program


From: Stan Caterbone (amgroup01@msn.com)
Sent:Mon 2/25/08 7:54 AM
To: jay ingram lfc (lfc1@comcast.net)

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Can you give me a time when you will be in today?


"Well, there's an even greater right, and that's the right of life, liberty and to live crime-free."
Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney
January 3, 2008
Lancaster Intelligencer Journal

Advanced Media Group


Stan J. Caterbone
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Visit Our Blog For Journey of a Whistleblower
CI-15-10167
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.S. Governments Activities
Visit Our Video Biography
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987
due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC
pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation
and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our
communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for
justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media
Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. Number 7.

From: lfc1@comcast.net
To: amgroup01@msn.com
Subject: Re: Iformation of Master Training Program
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:47:09 -0500
Give a call first to make sure I'm here.
Jay
892-3844
----- Original Message ----From: Stan Caterbone
To: jay ingram lfc
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 9:17 PM
Subject: RE: Information of Master Training Program

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 83 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 27 of 142

I'll stop by your office for a visit on Nolt Road, unless there is another
to some classes.
Thank You.

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
location. ILANCASTER,
look forwardPA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

"Well, there's an even greater right, and that's the right of life, liberty and to live crimefree."
Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney
January 3, 2008
Lancaster Intelligencer Journal

Advanced Media Group


Stan J. Caterbone

CI-15-10167

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Visit Our Blog For Journey of a Whistleblower
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.S. Governments Activities
Visit Our Video Biography

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International
Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud
in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the
media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further
libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through
the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced
Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. Number 7.

From: lfc1@comcast.net
To: amgroup01@msn.com
Subject: Re: Iformation of Master Training Program
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:51:38 -0500
Hi Stan,
Simply put, the Master Program entails any and all aspects of film
making. From the origination of an idea to the writing, rewriting, casting,
directing, producing and marketing.
A person who is interested in one or more of the aspects, signs up and
takes courses at their own rate of speed. Cost is nominal.
Best regards,
Jay Ingram
----- Original Message ----From: Stan Caterbone

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 84 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 28 of 142
To: lfc1@comcast.net
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 10:21 AM
Subject: Iformation of Master Training Program

Monday, November 23, 2015


ENTERED AND FILED
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Could you please send me information on your Master Training Program?


Please visit some of my film experience by clicking here.

"Well, there's an even greater right, and that's the right of life, liberty and
to live crime-free."

CI-15-10167

Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney


January 3, 2008
Lancaster Intelligencer Journal

Advanced Media Group


Stan J. Caterbone
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Visit Our Blog For Journey of a Whistleblower
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.S.
Governments Activities
Visit Our Video Biography

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,
defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of
misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty
to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to
defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would
normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further
libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight
for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to
continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you
wish to be removed from our Contact List. Number 7.

Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
Pleas PageMedia
85 of 198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 29 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Page 1 of 38

Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
Pleas PageMedia
86 of 198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 30 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
RE: Meeting wih the Dept of Justice.
LANCASTER, PA
From: Stan Caterbone (amgroup01@msn.com)
***Electronically Filed***
Sent: Sat 3/22/08 8:36 AM
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
To:
Barry A. Solodky (bas@bbt-law.com)
Andrew Gamber
FBI, Field Office (philadelphia@fbi.gov); Landis, Detective Michael (landism@co.lancaster.pa.us);
Cc:
info@hotelbrunswick.com
Owings, Lisa (lisa_owings@judiciary-rep.senate.gov); friends@foxnews.com;
newsletter@billoreilly.com; samlombardo@benecon.com; webmaster@live8live.chtah.com;
tom.tillett@mail.house.gov; jcfmmf@aol.com; jbuckwalter@lnpnews.com; mhalc@supernet.com;
pwenger@fultonbank.com; scarfley@barley.com; nikoloff@edclancaster.com;
rodanast@rodanast.com; info@aclupa.org; info@bloodhoundsinc.com; cvr@rkglaw.com;
Bcc:
sstark@co.santa-barbara.ca.us; bethg@harrywalker.com; ureyp@co.lancaster.pa.us;
senator_specter@specter.senate.gov; contactoge@oge.gov; rplotkin@mcguirewoods.com;
maria_plakoudas@specter.senate.gov; lburkholder@thewgalchannel.com; beyyerdd@aol.com;
wengerr@co.lancaster.pa.us; rhino1818@aol.com; sunnews@lnpnews.com;
intellletters@lnpnews.com; neweraletters@lnpnews.com
CI-15-10167
March 22, 2008
Re: Meeting With Department of Justice
Barry Solodky,
First, I would have responded earlier, however, your email found it's way into my junk email.
Secondly, as an officer of the court, you better be careful about spreading lies about me and fabrications
about events that did not happen. By the way, a copy of this will go directly to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation Philadelphia Field Office and Detective Michael Landis of the Lancaster County District
Attorney Office. Who do you think you are talking to?
Thirdly, here is what transpired. The day before I received an ORDER from the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, which was purposely postmarked 10 days after the Clerk filed and dated the Mail to copy to
myself. The ORDER was for a no response to a Show Cause ORDER, which someone had stole for my
mail, which I never received. The Third Circuit case was an appeal from my Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Now, on Wednesday morning I made plans to go to the Hotel Brunswick and take some measurements in
the Movie Theater, which I am in the middle of a development plan. As usual, I walked into the lobby on
the street level adjacent to the parking garage and saw the eisel with the notice that the "Department of
Justice" was holding bankruptcy hearings. I was told a few years ago earlier in my Chapter 11 that they
often hold hearings in Lancaster, at the Brusnwick or at the Hotel on Manheim Pike. As soon as I saw the
sign I figured I would see if Joe Adams, my Trustee from the Philadelphia Office of the Department of
Justice Office of Trustee that handles my case, was here.
So, as I usually do, I went to the office of Kevin, the Hotel Brunswick General Manager to get the key to
the movie theater, as per our agreement with Hamid, the owner of the Hotel Brunswick. He was not in his
office, and the Desk Manager had to page him. I asked him where the Department of Justice was holding
the hearings, and told him I needed to talk to someone there, while he was trying to locate Kevin, the
General Manager. I told him I would be right back.
I went to the Presidential Room where they were holding meetings. When I arrived, the Trustee, or what
private panel trustee, was conducting a meeting with a Spanish woman, who had a young girl for a
translator. I patiently waited by the wall as you walk in until the entire interview was over. After the
private panel trustee dismissed the woman, I approached her and asked her if she was from the
Department of Justice Office of the Trustee, and she responded that she was a private panel trustee. I
simply told her that I had a problem with someone obstructing justice with my Third Circuit case and
asked her if Joe Adams was in her office. She said she was not from the Philadelphia Office. I gave her
my card and some woman kept trying to talk and interfere. I just calmly left. I went to meet Kevin, the
General Manager, he opened the movie theater and I spent approximately 1 hour taking measurements of
the existing floor plan.

Page 2 of 38

Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
Pleas PageMedia
87 of 198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 31 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
There was no incident to speak of. Any incident was a lie, regardless of the person
that kept interfering
***Electronically
Filed***
with our conversation that was trying to cause problems. It was not me, you fool. Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
I would suggest that you provide this email to the person that told you that fabricated lie and anyone else
that you communicate with regarding your so called version of an "incident". Follow this link and you may
read why people like you lie about these incidents.
Now, you have a nice Easter Weekend. And by the way, I am a supporter of Senator Clinton and I do
volunteer my services, just in case you were wondering.

"Well, there's an even greater right, and that's the right of life, liberty and to live crime-free."
Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney
January 3, 2008
Lancaster Intelligencer Journal
CI-15-10167
Advanced Media Group
Stan J. Caterbone
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Visit Our Blog For Journey of a Whistleblower
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.S. Governments Activities
Visit Our Video Biography

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly discredited
since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of
Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are
forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute
and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of
protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to
be removed from our Contact List. Number 7.

>

Page 3 of 38

Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
Pleas PageMedia
88 of 198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 32 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
Subject:
LANCASTER, PA
> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:18:00 -0400
***Electronically Filed***
> From: bas@bbt-law.com
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
> To: amgroup01@msn.com
Andrew Gamber
>
> Hi Stan,
>
> Hope this note finds you well.
>
> Yesterday afternoon I had to attend some bankruptcy meetings on behalf of some clients. While there
the Trustee told me about an event which concerned her. She showed me your card and told me what
happened. In fact she said she almost considered calling the police because of the incident.
>
> I assured her you were not the type of person that would do anything inappropriate. I did want you to
know she is not an employee of the Dept. of Justice or the Bankruptcy Court; she is a private panel
trustee just as I was for 33 years. If for some reason you have issues with the bankruptcy system she is
CI-15-10167
not a person who should be hassled as she has nothing to do with your case.
>
> I'm sending this only because I don't want there to be any further incidents which might cause her
concern or the Federal marshals will get involved and I know they can be nasty. Needless to say I don't
want to see anything to you which would cause you any problems.
>
> I am sure I will bump into you soon. Have a nice Easter.
>
>
> Barry A. Solodky, Esquire
> Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C.
> 28 Penn Square
> Lancaster, PA 17603
> (717) 509-7273
> E-mail: bas@bbt-law.com
>

>
>
>

Page 4 of 38

Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
Pleas PageMedia
89 of 198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 33 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
LANCASTER,
PA
amgroup01@msn.com
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Investors and/or interested deveopers please respond via email.

Advanced Media Group's (8) Year Investment into Downtown Lancaster,


The Lancaster Convention Center & Our UPS STORE Concept.

ADVACED MEDIA GROUPS (8) YEAR IVESTMET I DOWTOW LACASTER

CI-15-10167

This weekend at the Party that Mayor Rick Gray hosted on Friday night in the Dome, we were discussing
the needs for retail establishments in Downtown Lancaster. He had told me that the James Street
Improvement District had done a retail assessment of the current retail space and a needs analysis of
needed retail spaces that would compliment the already existing retail space. I have been investing time
and energies to the revitalization of Downtown Lancaster for the past 8 years.
I informed Rick that I have an exclusive agreement for a UPS Shipping/Copy Store in
Downtown Lancaster, and he thought it was a great fit and a great idea for Downtown
Lancaster. Advanced Media Group would also add services such as scanning, imaging, and
records management services that would attract an additional market to the concept.
I am an ardent advocate for the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center and in April of 2005 we sued the
Lancaster County Hoteliers for refusing to pay the Tourism Excise Tax. We are still continuing our efforts
for the Excelsior Place Development on East King Street.
We currently have a signed Non Disclosure Agreement with Realtor Jeff Lefevre and Caldwell Banker for
the Excelsior Place Property.
I also had authored the Development Plan for the S.N. Lombardo Development on 626 West Charllotte
Street in May of 2007.
In 2005 I had worked closely with Joe Pinto, the former General Manager for the Lancaster Barnstormers
and the Clipper Stadium; drawing on my experience working with Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios in New York for our "Digital Movie". I was trying to help the Clipper Stadium locate and contract
music acts for a Summer Concert Series. I had begun talks with Sara McLachlan and hope that when
Sara
McLachlan
returns
on
tour
the
Clipper
will
be
one
of
her
concerts.
I had talks with Clair Brothers in Lititz (In 1987 Gene Clair was considering an investment into my
"Digital Movie with Tony Bongiovi) to try to help attract some acts to the Stadium. Unfortunately, when I
had met with Randy Patterson of the Redevelopment Authority, which owns the Stadium, I learned that
concerts were not a top priority for them or the Barnstormers.
Maybe that will change before next Spring. And of course, Sheryl Crow is a shareholder of Advanced
Media Group, so someday maybe she might come around. I was also trying to convince Joe Pinto of the
merits of a country concert or two, and we all know by now what Country Music means to Lancaster
County.
My family had various successful investments in Downtown Lancaster over the past 50 years. My fathers
first Dry Cleaners (Sam Caterbone Cleaners, Inc.,) was on the corner of Plum and Orange Streets before
expanding and moving to Manheim Pike in the early 1960s. My Uncle Dominic (Mickey) Roda was the
proprietor for Garvins Beauty Salon, in the former Garvins Department Store, which later moved across
the street to the Lancaster Parking Garage on East King Street. My other Uncle Benjamin Roda operated
Rodas Beauty Salon on East King Street. And I had an office for SJ Caterbone Painting and Renovating

Page 5 of 38

Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
Pleas PageMedia
90 of 198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 34 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
on the corner of Walnut and Marshall Streets.
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Here is my resume and below is my website for your information. You may also visit
Novmy
20Video
2015 Biography
06:18AM
by clicking here.
Andrew Gamber
We do have a very successful track record for vision in our 25 year history of entrepreneurship.
Sincerely,
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
Stan J. Caterbone
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Visit Our Blog
Visit Our Video Biography

CI-15-10167

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987
due to going public (WhistleBlower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal& Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC
pleaded guilty to selling arms toIraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend ourreputation
and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media,which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our
communications to thwartfurther libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and ourbusiness. We continue our fight
forjustice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protectingour rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced
Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish tobe removed from our Contact List.

Page 6 of 38

Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
Pleas PageMedia
91 of 198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 35 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
***Electronically Filed***
mailto:amgroup01@msn.com
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Blog: http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/
Andrew Gamber
Research Bog: at: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com
Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup

Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

CI-15-10167
Advanced Media Groups Downtown Lancaster Revitalization
Action Plan
Advanced Media Group has been working with Downtown Lancaster developers and the James Street
Investment District to facilitate this action plan.
Project 1 Excelsior Place on East King Street
In 1998 Advanced Media Group had developed a comprehensive plan for the revitalization of the Excelsior
Place Historic Property (Sprecher Brewery) located 1 block from the proposed Downtown Lancaster
Convention Center. We had planned a unique entertainment complex comprised of a Pub, an upscale
restaurant in the lower catacomb, and a nightclub in the first floor. We had also developed and designed a
state-of-the-art video conferencing facility to compliment the Convention Center. We have joined in the
talks and discussions with principals, stakeholders, and taxing authorities concerning the present proposals
and the future of the revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and the Convention Center.
Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County
against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn (Lancaster County Hoteliers) for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center. The City of Lancaster
supported the civil action. We also proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel
Brunswick and Lancaster Square to all of the major stakeholders.

In 2007 Advanced Media Group signed a Non Disclosure Agreement with a local real estate firm to continue
the advancement of the Excelsior Place Business Plan.
Project 2 UPS/MBE Copy Store or FedEx/Kinkos Copy & Print Store
Advanced Media Group has an exclusive agreement for a UPS Shipping/Copy Store or a FedEx/Kinkos
in Downtown Lancaster. There is no such service currently serving the needs of downtown businesses and it
is a vital component for the Lancaster County Convention Center. In 1998 Advanced Media Group had
contacted Mail Box Etc., and began initial franchise due diligence. However when the Lancaster County
Convention Center was stalled, Advanced Media Group also put the project on the back burner. In 2005
Advanced Media Group negotiated for the exclusive right of first refusal to move the UPS Store at Stone Mill
Plaza to downtown Lancaster.

Page 7 of 38

Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
Pleas PageMedia
92 of 198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 36 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
The UPS/MBE Franchise is ranked number 4 among all franchises and number oneLANCASTER,
in the shipping-postal
PA
store categories by Forbes.
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Advanced Media Group would also add services such as scanning, imaging, and records management
services that would attract an additional market to the concept. The UPS/MBE Franchise is ranked
number 4 among all franchises and number one in the shipping-postal store categories by Forbes. Advanced
Media Group is currently studying several site locations, including storefronts at the Brunswick Hotel, and a
possible East King Street site. Advanced Media Group would like to cater to the many legal firms that
conduct business in the Lancaster County Courthouse.

In 1990 Advanced Media Group developed and copyrighted the AMG Legal Systems Prototype which was
a digital search and retrieval application designed to help legal firms deal with the complexities
of organizing
CI-15-10167
and filing court cases.
Advanced Media Group has specialized in records management and has a vast knowledge base and
experience in optical publishing and records management. This service would allow firms to convert and
store records off-site in a secure location with state-of-the-art retrieval services.

Typical Desktop Publishing services and binding services would also be offered.
Project 3 Downtown Lancaster Movie Theater
A downtown Lancaster Movie Theater is vital to support the Lancaster County Convention Center and the
Downtown Lancaster Revitalization at large.
Advanced Media Group has been performing due diligence on reopening the movie theaters at the Hotel
Brunswick for the past 18 months. A recent site survey confirms that the movie theaters are in perfect
operating condition and negotiations with local business leaders are continuing. The Brunswick movie
theater has 2 screens with approximately 500 seats per screen.
Project 4 Big Box Retail in Downtown Lancaster
Advanced Media Group has been attempting to help facilitate the attraction of a big box retailer for
Downtown Lancaster. In 2006 Advanced Media Group had discussions with the owner of Bulova
Technologies regarding the development of that building to a retail store. The Advanced Media Group has
contacted the Corporate development teams of the Hard Rock Caf and Best Buy Electronics Stores.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group had talks with former Mayor Charlie Smithgall in attempts at trying to lure a
Cabelas or a Pro Shops to the site.

Advanced Media Group


Stan J. Caterbone
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Visit Our Blog at: www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
Visit Our Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup
Visit Our Research Blog at: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com

Page 8 of 38

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Advanced Media Group

93 of 198
THEATER Page
AT HOTEL
BRUNSWICK
Page 37 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING

ENTERED
AND November
FILED 23, 2015
Monday,
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November
5, 2015
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Advanced Media Group


March 28, 2008

Account Descriptions
SALES
Gross Sales Forcast
Theater 1
Theater 2
Performances
Concessions
Trailers
Advertisers
Theater Rentals
Sales - Misc
Total Sales

% of
Sales

Nov-09

Dec-09

Year 1
Jan-10

Year 1
Feb-10

Year 1
Mar-10

Year 1
Apr-10

Year 1
May-10

Year 1
Jun-10

Year 1
Jul-10

Year 1
Aug-10

151,919

Year 1
Oct-10

Year 1
Nov-10

119,731

97,356

95,606

95,606

95,606

99,981

128,975

155,100

151,919

155,169

52.00%
12.00%
17.00%
18.00%
1.00%
100.00%

32,175
4,950
7,425
4,950
0
49,500

77,825
11,973
17,960
11,973
0
119,731

63,282
9,736
14,603
9,736
0
97,356

62,144
9,561
14,341
9,561
1,000
96,606

62,144
9,561
14,341
9,561
1,000
96,606

62,144
9,561
14,341
9,561
1,000
96,606

52,990
11,998
16,997
17,997
1,000
100,981

68,357
15,477
21,926
23,216
1,000
129,975

82,203CI-15-10167
80,517
80,517
80,517
18,612
18,230
18,230
18,230
26,367
25,826
25,826
25,826
27,918
27,345
27,345
27,345
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
156,100
152,919
152,919
152,919

82,239
18,620
26,379
27,930
1,000
156,169

36.00%
43.00%
24.00%
34.00%

Total C.O.G.S.
GROSS PROFIT

11,583
2,129
1,782
1,683
17,177
32,324

28,017
5,148
4,310
4,071
41,547
78,185

22,781
4,186
3,505
3,310
33,783
63,574

22,372
4,111
3,442
3,251
33,175
63,431

22,372
4,111
3,442
3,251
33,175
63,431

22,372
4,111
3,442
3,251
33,175
63,431

19,076
5,159
4,079
6,119
34,434
66,548

24,608
6,655
5,262
7,893
44,419
85,556

29,593
8,003
6,328
9,492
53,416
102,684

28,986
7,839
6,198
9,297
52,321
100,598

28,986
7,839
6,198
9,297
52,321
100,598

28,986
7,839
6,198
9,297
52,321
100,598

29,606
8,007
6,331
9,496
53,440
102,729

GROSS PROFIT MARGIN

65.30%

65.30%

65.30%

65.66%

65.66%

65.66%

65.90%

65.82%

65.78%

65.79%

65.79%

65.79%

65.78%

Page 9 of 38

Advanced Media Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick, December 26, 2009

49,500

COST OF GOODS SOLD


Distribution Fees
Food & Beverage

151,919

Year 1
Sep-10

OPERATING EXPENSES
Payroll & Related Expenses
Wages
Management Salaries
Payroll Taxes
Insurance, Work. Comp.
Insurance, Health
Total Payroll Related

21.16%
8.51%
3.08%
0.81%
1.25%
35%

20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914

20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914

20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914

20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914

20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914

20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914

30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541

30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541

30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541

30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541

30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541

30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541

30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541

Direct Operating Expenses


Supplies
Outside Services
Trash Removal
Total Direct Operating

1.24%
0.49%
0.58%
3.46%

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

1,578
618
741
2,937

12/26/2009

Page 1 of 6

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Advanced Media Group

94 of 198
THEATER Page
AT HOTEL
BRUNSWICK
Page 38 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING

ENTERED
AND November
FILED 23, 2015
Monday,
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November
5, 2015
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Advanced Media Group


March 28, 2008

Account Descriptions

Non-Operating Expenses
Rent
Legal & Accounting
Insurance, Property & Liability
Misc General & Administrative
Debt Service
Total Non-Operating
Total Expenses
NET PROFIT
NET PROFIT MARGIN

12/26/2009

Nov-09

Dec-09

Year 1
Jan-10

Year 1
Feb-10

Year 1
Mar-10

Year 1
Apr-10

Year 1
May-10

Year 1
Jun-10

Year 1
Jul-10

Year 1
Aug-10

Year 1
Sep-10

Year 1
Oct-10

Year 1
Nov-10

3.10%
0.50%
0.19%
2.49%
0.40%
0.04%
0.48%
0.38%
0.25%
0.16%
0.10%
0.29%
0%
9%

3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193

3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193

3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193

3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193

3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193

3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

3,954
3,954
3,954
3,954
642
642
642
642
247
247
247
247
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
512CI-15-10167
512
512
512
48
48
48
48
614
614
614
614
486
486
486
486
313
313
313
313
210
210
210
210
125
125
125
125
375
375
375
375
167
167
167
167
11,193
11,193
11,193
11,193

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

3.93%
0.59%
0.34%
0.33%
0.79%
5.97%

0
755
429
417
1,000
2,601
28,860

0
755
429
417
1,000
2,601
28,860

5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
33,860

5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
33,860

5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
33,860

5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
33,860

5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860

5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860

5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860

5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860

5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860

5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860

5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860

-21,321
-43.07%

24,540
20.50%

4,930
5.06%

4,787
4.95%

4,787
4.95%

4,787
4.95%

-2,724
-2.70%

16,285
12.53%

33,412
21.40%

31,327
20.49%

31,327
20.49%

31,327
20.49%

33,457
21.42%

Page 2 of 6

Advanced Media Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick, December 26, 2009

Page 10 of 38

Indirect Operating Expenses


Advertising & Promotions
Repairs & Maintenance
Telephone (In-Utilities)
Utilities
Water & Sewer
Cable
Office Exp. & Supplies
Miscellaneous
Travel Expense
Licenses
Dues & Subscriptions
Contributions
Miscellaneous Taxes (DID)
Total Indirect Operating

% of
Sales

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Advanced Media Group

95 of 198
THEATER Page
AT HOTEL
BRUNSWICK
Page 39 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING

ENTERED
AND November
FILED 23, 2015
Monday,
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November
5, 2015
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Advanced Media Group


March 28, 2008

Account Descriptions

Page 11 of 38

COST OF GOODS SOLD


Distribution Fees
Food & Beverage

Year 1
Dec-10

YEAR 1
FYE

Year 2
Jan-11

Year 2
Feb-11

Year 2
Mar-11

Year 2
Apr-11

Year 2
May-11

Year 2
Jun-11

Year 2
Jul-11

Year 2
Aug-11

Year 2
Nov-11

147,969

147,969

147,969

146,656

170,781

187,844

187,844

52.00%
12.00%
17.00%
18.00%
1.00%
100.00%

73,296
850,350
16,595
174,411
23,510
250,283
24,893
242,407
1,000
11,000
139,294 1,528,450

78,423
17,756
25,155
26,634
1,000
148,969

78,423
17,756
25,155
26,634
1,000
148,969

78,423
17,756
25,155
26,634
1,000
148,969

77,728
17,599
24,932
26,398
1,000
147,656

90,514
20,494
29,033
30,741
1,000
171,781

99,557
22,541
31,933
33,812
1,000
188,844

99,557
22,541
31,933
33,812
1,000
188,844

22,541
31,933
33,812
1,000
188,844

21,371
30,276
32,057
1,000
179,094

19,144
27,120
28,716
1,000
160,531

84,552
19,144
27,120
28,716
1,000
160,531

36.00%
43.00%
24.00%
34.00%

26,386
306,126
7,136
74,997
5,642
60,068
8,464
82,418
47,628
523,609
91,665 1,004,841

28,232
7,635
6,037
9,056
50,960
98,008

28,232
7,635
6,037
9,056
50,960
98,008

28,232
7,635
6,037
9,056
50,960
98,008

27,982
7,567
5,984
8,975
50,508
97,148

32,585
8,812
6,968
10,452
58,817
112,964

35,841
9,693
7,664
11,496
64,693
124,150

35,841
9,693
7,664
11,496
64,693
124,150

35,841
9,693
7,664
11,496
64,693
124,150

33,980
9,190
7,266
10,899
61,335
117,758

30,439
8,232
6,509
9,763
54,943
105,589

30,439
8,232
6,509
9,763
54,943
105,589

GROSS PROFIT MARGIN

178,094

Year 2
Oct-11

138,294

Total C.O.G.S.
GROSS PROFIT

187,844

Year 2
Sep-11

159,531

CI-15-10167
99,557
94,390
84,552

159,531

65.81%

65.74%

65.79%

65.79%

65.79%

65.79%

65.76%

65.74%

65.74%

65.74%

65.75%

65.77%

65.77%

OPERATING EXPENSES
Payroll & Related Expenses
Wages
Management Salaries
Payroll Taxes
Insurance, Work. Comp.
Insurance, Health
Total Payroll Related

21.16%
8.51%
3.08%
0.81%
1.25%
35%

30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541

323,424
130,000
47,067
12,351
19,142
531,983

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

Direct Operating Expenses


Supplies
Outside Services
Trash Removal
Total Direct Operating

1.24%
0.49%
0.58%
3.46%

1,578
618
741
2,937

18,930
7,413
8,896
35,240

18,930
8,523
8,896
36,349

1,578
710
741
3,029

1,578
710
741
3,029

1,578
710
741
3,029

1,578
710
741
3,029

1,578
710
741
3,029

1,578
710
741
3,029

1,578
710
741
3,029

1,578
710
741
3,029

1,578
710
741
3,029

1,578
710
741
3,029

12/26/2009

Page 3 of 6

Advanced Media Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick, December 26, 2009

SALES
Gross Sales Forcast
Theater 1
Theater 2
Performances
Concessions
Trailers
Advertisers
Theater Rentals
Sales - Misc
Total Sales

% of
Sales

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Advanced Media Group

96 of 198
THEATER Page
AT HOTEL
BRUNSWICK
Page 40 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING

ENTERED
AND November
FILED 23, 2015
Monday,
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November
5, 2015
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Advanced Media Group


March 28, 2008

Account Descriptions

Non-Operating Expenses
Rent
Legal & Accounting
Insurance, Property & Liability
Misc General & Administrative
Debt Service
Total Non-Operating
Total Expenses
NET PROFIT
NET PROFIT MARGIN

12/26/2009

Year 1
Dec-10

YEAR 1
FYE

Year 2
Jan-11

Year 2
Feb-11

Year 2
Mar-11

Year 2
Apr-11

Year 2
May-11

Year 2
Jun-11

Year 2
Jul-11

Year 2
Aug-11

Year 2
Sep-11

Year 2
Oct-11

Year 2
Nov-11

3.10%
0.50%
0.19%
2.49%
0.40%
0.04%
0.48%
0.38%
0.25%
0.16%
0.10%
0.29%
0%
9%

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

47,445
7,710
2,965
38,000
6,144
571
7,367
5,833
3,756
2,521
1,500
4,500
2,000
130,311

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

3,954
3,954
3,954
3,954
642
642
642
642
247
247
247
247
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
CI-15-10167
512
512
512
512
48
48
48
48
614
614
614
614
486
486
486
486
313
313
313
313
210
210
210
210
125
125
125
125
375
375
375
375
167
167
167
167
11,193
11,193
11,193
11,193

3.93%
0.59%
0.34%
0.33%
0.79%
5.97%

5,000
60,000
755
9,065
429
5,149
417
5,000
1,000
12,000
7,601
91,214
35,860 1,312,356

10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
109,884

10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564

10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564

10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564

10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564

10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564

10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564

10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564

10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564

10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564

10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564

-11,876
-7.97%

21,444
14.40%

21,444
14.40%

20,584
13.94%

36,400
21.19%

47,586
25.20%

47,586
25.20%

47,586
25.20%

41,194
23.00%

29,025
18.08%

29,025
18.08%

22,394
16.08%

216,094
14.14%

Page 4 of 6

Advanced Media Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick, December 26, 2009

Page 12 of 38

Indirect Operating Expenses


Advertising & Promotions
Repairs & Maintenance
Telephone (In-Utilities)
Utilities
Water & Sewer
Cable
Office Exp. & Supplies
Miscellaneous
Travel Expense
Licenses
Dues & Subscriptions
Contributions
Miscellaneous Taxes (DID)
Total Indirect Operating

% of
Sales

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Advanced Media Group

97 of 198
THEATER Page
AT HOTEL
BRUNSWICK
Page 41 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING
Advanced Media Group
March 28, 2008

Account Descriptions

Page 13 of 38

COST OF GOODS SOLD


Distribution Fees
Food & Beverage

Year 2
Dec-11

YEAR 2
FYE

181,469 2,003,500

52.00%
12.00%
17.00%
18.00%
1.00%
100.00%

96,178 1,061,855
21,776
240,420
30,850
340,595
32,664
360,630
1,000
12,000
182,469 2,015,500

36.00%
43.00%
24.00%
34.00%

34,624
382,268
9,364
103,381
7,404
81,743
11,106
122,614
62,498
690,005
119,971 1,325,495

Total C.O.G.S.
GROSS PROFIT
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN

65.75%

65.77%

OPERATING EXPENSES
Payroll & Related Expenses
Wages
Management Salaries
Payroll Taxes
Insurance, Work. Comp.
Insurance, Health
Total Payroll Related

21.16%
8.51%
3.08%
0.81%
1.25%
35%

32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

384,000
130,000
49,000
12,351
19,142
594,493

Direct Operating Expenses


Supplies
Outside Services
Trash Removal
Total Direct Operating

1.24%
0.49%
0.58%
3.46%

1,578
710
741
3,029

36,283
16,336
17,051
69,670

12/26/2009

CI-15-10167

Page 5 of 6

Advanced Media Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick, December 26, 2009

SALES
Gross Sales Forcast
Theater 1
Theater 2
Performances
Concessions
Trailers
Advertisers
Theater Rentals
Sales - Misc
Total Sales

% of
Sales

ENTERED
AND November
FILED 23, 2015
Monday,
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November
5, 2015
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Advanced Media Group

98 of 198
THEATER Page
AT HOTEL
BRUNSWICK
Page 42 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING
Advanced Media Group
March 28, 2008

Account Descriptions

Non-Operating Expenses
Rent
Legal & Accounting
Insurance, Property & Liability
Misc General & Administrative
Debt Service
Total Non-Operating
Total Expenses
NET PROFIT
NET PROFIT MARGIN

12/26/2009

Year 2
Dec-11

YEAR 2
FYE

3.10%
0.50%
0.19%
2.49%
0.40%
0.04%
0.48%
0.38%
0.25%
0.16%
0.10%
0.29%
0%
9%

3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193

3.93%
0.59%
0.34%
0.33%
0.79%
5.97%

10,200
122,400
755
9,065
429
5,149
417
5,000
1,000
12,000
12,801
153,614
76,564 1,642,092
43,407
23.79%

47,445
7,710
2,965
42,000
6,144
571
7,367
5,833
3,756
2,521
1,500
4,500
2,000
134,311

CI-15-10167

373,408
18.53%

Page 6 of 6

Advanced Media Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick, December 26, 2009

Page 14 of 38

Indirect Operating Expenses


Advertising & Promotions
Repairs & Maintenance
Telephone (In-Utilities)
Utilities
Water & Sewer
Cable
Office Exp. & Supplies
Miscellaneous
Travel Expense
Licenses
Dues & Subscriptions
Contributions
Miscellaneous Taxes (DID)
Total Indirect Operating

% of
Sales

ENTERED
AND November
FILED 23, 2015
Monday,
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November
5, 2015
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
Pleas PageMedia
99 of 198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 43 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Not Inclusive - Shared Costs To Be Determined
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

BUDGET

ALTERNATE
FUNDING

LOBBY
Paint
Concession Counters & Displays
Popcorn Machines
Food Displays
Carpet Restoration
Lobby Subtotal

$0.00

Ticket Booth & Office Subtotal

$0.00

TICKET BOOTH & OFFICE


Ticket System
Office Furnishings

THEATER 1
Curtains
Theater Seats
Floor Lighting
Floor Painting/Carpeting
Sound System
Theater 1 Subtotal

$0.00

Theater 2 Subtotal

$0.00

Stage Subtotal

$0.00

THEATER 2
Curtains
Theater Seats
Floor Lighting
Floor Painting/Carpeting
Sound System

STAGE
Sound System
Lighting
Stage
Moveable Partition
Backstage Setup

Projection Room
Projector 1
Projector 2
DLP Projector 1
DLP Projector 2

Page 15 of 38

CI-15-10167

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
100 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 44 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Racks
Andrew Gamber
Painting
Floor Paint/Carpeting

Projection Room Subtotal

$0.00

2ND FLOOR OFFICES


Computer Systems
Desk and Counters
Office Supplies
Legal - Registration/Agreements
Design - Logo/Stationary/Business Cards
Printers/Calculators/IPOD/Iphone
2nd Floor Subtotal

$0.00

Total Costs

$0.00

CI-15-10167

Page 16 of 38

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Advanced Media Group

Page 101 of 198


Page 45 of 142

ENTERED
AND November
FILED 23, 2015
Monday,
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November
5, 2015
LANCASTER,
PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Quote No.: QSTSRF_10908
Andrew Gamber

Strong Cinema Products

Equipment Quotation

A wholly-owned subsidiary of Ballantyne of Omaha

4350 McKinley Street, Omaha, NE 68112 USA


TEL: +1 (402) 453-4444; FAX: +1 (402) 453-7238
WEB: www.strong-cinema.com; EMAIL: CustSales@btn-inc.com
DEALER (Exporter):

SHIP TO (Project):

Roger Fitzwater

2 screens

717-278-4199

woodcrestaudio@yahoo.com

Line
Item

Quant Unit

Order No.

Description

Date:
Customer Request:
Prices Good For:
Customer Account No.:
Req'd Date of Shipment:
Method of Transport:
Goods Terms:
Freight Terms:
Handling/Duties Agent:
Unit
Net (US$)

Unit LIST
Price (US$)

1/8/08
1/8/08
90 days

TBA
TBA
FOB Omaha
Total
Net (US$)

CI-15-10167

Film Equipment
2

EA SIMSYS3/RS

EA HLIIA-HR3

XENON CONSOLE SYSTEM:


Strong Highlight II Console System 3000 watts

EA PREWIRE

Projector Prewired

SET FGS-35

eCNA100-C1

Simplex Millennium II 35mm Projector:


w/ Two-Lens Manual Turret
w/ New Analog LED Visible red readers
Change over Unit
Synch Motor 110/220V, 60Hz.
35mm Upper & Lower Film Guidance system

Strong eCNA100 console mount automation with Single


termination board(394321-2K) Failsafe included

$13,430.00

40%

$8,058.00

$260.00 40%

$156.00

$9,935.00 40%

$5,961.00

$475.00 40%

$285.00

$3,160.00 40%

$1,896.00

16,116.00

312.00

11,922.00
570.00

3,792.00

EA LTIX3000WH

3000 watts Xenon bulbs

$1,050.00

50%

$525.00

1,575.00

8
9
10

2
1
1

EA 2464160
EA 2465004
EA 2468278

PLATTER SYSTEM:
35SCDC-3 35mm 3 Deck platter w/ 2 Payout Assy
AP Make-Up Table
SP-35 35mm tape splicer

$6,450.00 45%
$1,330.00 45%
$800.00 45%

$3,547.50
$731.50
$440.00

7,095.00
731.50
440.00

11
12

2
2

EA ISCO
EA ISCO

LENSES
ISCO Lens FLAT (Sizes to be determined)
ISCO Lens SCOPE (Sizes to be determined)

$860.00
$1,962.00

1,720.00
3,924.00

Page 1 of 2

Advanced Media Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick, December 26, 2009

Page 17 of 38
File: QSTS RF_10908

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Advanced Media Group
13
2
EA SR-70B
14

15

16

17

20

20

Page 102 of 198


Page
142
Basic Sound Rack with Power
strip, 46
fan, of
rack
panel and prewire

SC-322

2-way, 2x15", bi-amp screen channel, consists of DCS HF-63


and DCS LF-3215 components

SB-7218

Cinema subwoofer, dual 18" 1500 W transducers, 101 dB


sensitivity

SR-110B

QM-SW

EA

EA

EA

EA

ENTERED
AND November
FILED 23, 2015
Monday,
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November
5, 2015
LANCASTER,
PA
$1,000.00
2,000.00
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
7,365.00
Andrew
Gamber
$1,227.50
$1,067.25

2,134.50

Cinema surround loudspeaker, 10" 2-way, 95H x 85V, 94 dB


sensitivity

$266.00

5,320.00

Side wall quick-mount for DCS-SR-18, SR-26, SR-46 and SR110B

$17.30

346.00

18

EA

2 channels, 625 watts/ch at 8O, 1050 watts/ch at 4O, 1500


DCA 3022 watts/ch at 2O for Subwoofer

19

EA

2 channels, 350 watts/ch at 8O, 600 watts/ch at 4O, 800


DCA 1622 watts/ch at 2O for Stage

$776.50

4,659.00

20

EA

2 channels, 475 watts/ch at 8O, 825 watts/ch at 4O, 1200


DCA 2422 watts/ch at 2O for Surrounds

$974.00

3,896.00

$1,165.25

2,330.50

CI-15-10167

76,248.50

All Prices are FCA Origin or Ballantyne of Omaha. Please allow


4-6 weeks lead time on major equipment orders.
50% due with order.

File: QSTS RF_10908

Page 2 of 2

Advanced Media Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick, December 26, 2009

Page 18 of 38
Total FOB Omaha NE

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
103 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 47 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
Published on April 15, 2008, Lancaster New Era (PA)
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Walk This Way
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Get ready for a sea change,'' says Rick Gray. Lancaster's enthusiastic mayor is talking about how the
downtown will look next spring, when the first visitors arrive at the Lancaster County Convention Center
and Marriott Hotel on Penn Square.
If all goes as planned, the difference will be dramatic. Sidewalks, lighting, benches and trash receptacles
will be standardized by then to unify the downtown streetscape. And new street trees will be planted.
Click for complete article, (1046 words)

Article 4 of 2121, 677490000000.1109609


Published on April 13, 2008, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)

CI-15-10167

The future that wasn't


Believe it or not, it was once a nice place. Not long ago, there was news about the partial demolition of the
east side of Lancaster Square, that desolate, windswept plaza surrounded by the hulking, windowless
Bulova building on one side and the Hotel Brunswick on the other, all connected by a creepy, abandoned,
multilevel concrete walkway.
It's all so ... so ... Soviet. And so sad. But it wasn't always that way. I remember.
When Lancaster Square went up around
Click for complete article, (524 words)

Article 5 of 2121, 677490120008.080013.1109609


Published on April 13, 2008, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
The Future That Wasn't
Believe it or not, it was once a nice place. Not long ago, there was news about the partial demolition of the
east side of Lancaster Square, that desolate, windswept plaza surrounded by the hulking, windowless
Bulova building on one side and the Hotel Brunswick on the other, all connected by a creepy, abandoned,
multilevel concrete walkway.
It's all so ... so ... Soviet. And so sad. But it wasn't always that way. I remember.
When Lancaster Square went up around
Click for complete article, (527 words)

Published on February 27, 2008, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)


Lancaster Square could see start of overhaul as soon as summer
City officials said Tuesday that plans to demolish portions of Lancaster Square are being finalized and
pieces of the concrete eyesore could start coming down this summer. The proposed work would occur on
the east side of the square - between the Hotel Brunswick and the Bulova building - and likely would
include demolition of the pedestrian walkway that spans North Queen Street, the stairwell and planter on
the south side of the square and the removal of the roof around the second-floor

Page 19 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
104 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 48 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
Click for complete article, (320 words)
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Published on August 30, 2007, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Lancaster Square: It's a dirty job, but ...
Maybe Mike Rowe would be up for the job. You might know him as the wisecracking host of "Dirty Jobs"
on the Discovery Channel. One week he's picking up roadkill; the next he's feeling inside a cow for a fetus.
Rowe shows us the people who do these jobs, and he rolls up his sleeves, holds his nose and tries the
work himself.
Well, we have a job in Lancaster he should try.
It's not catching the acid vandal. I'm afraid
Click for complete article, (593 words)

CI-15-10167

Published on January 21, 2007, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)


Budget to build
Up until now the convention center project on Penn Square has been much on "Big talk, little action." Next
month that should change, says the executive director of the Lancaster County Convention Center
Authority.
When the authority's new budget is unveiled, the public will see evidence that the embattled project is
well under way, said David Hixson, because the majority of the authority's spending in fiscal 2007-08 will
go toward actually
Click for complete article, (1337 words)
Published on December 24, 2006, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
Authority started marketing work on project in 2003
Dan Logan doesn't just live his job. He eats and sleeps it, too. And that's a good thing, because Logan,
president and owner of Growth Business Development, Medford, N.J., makes a living as a consultant to
the hospitality industry.
For several years, Logan, once vice president of operations for the Hotel Brunswick, has worked with the
Lancaster County Convention Center Authority and others in the local tourism and hospitality industries to
develop a plan to market
Click for complete article, (1496 words)
Published on August 3, 2006, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Two squares beat as one
The fortunes of Lancaster Square are tied to those of Penn Square, according to the owner of Hotel
Brunswick. Hamid Zahedi wrote Wednesday that his hotel, based at Lancaster Square, could be renovated
to "four-diamond/four-star" quality, and its two-story concrete annex transformed into "two or three
restaurants ... plus entertainment for persons in their 30s and older."
Zahedi outlined his vision Wednesday in a letter to Lancaster County
Click for complete article, (724 words)

Page 20 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
105 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 49 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Published on August 2, 2006, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Move convention center 1 block away
TO THE EDITOR: Now that there is some type of finality to the controversy of the convention center, I
would like to make a suggestion to the county, Penn Square Partners and anyone involved with the
downtown convention center idea. I have been relating this idea to numerous friends over the past six
months, and every one of them has thought it to be an excellent idea.
I think the convention center concept is a great idea. However, the cost and scope of the "former"
Click for complete article, (326 words)

CI-15-10167
Article 125 of 2121, 677490000000.873631
Published on August 2, 2006, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Convention center needed Lillian G. Bennett Lancaster
Editor, New Era: Lancaster needs a convention center, not a Plan "B."
Look what good things happened to Covington, Ky., an excellent example of a new discovery for people
who want to know about this country.
Lancaster County not only has country but the city to offer visitors.
How many people know that this is the oldest inland city in our country that opened up the West? How
many know that Thaddeus Stevens and James Buchanan battled it out politically here
Click for complete article, (405 words)

Article 126 of 2121, 677490000000.872402


Published on July 30, 2006, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
FAN MAIL Days until I let my Lancaster Newspapers subscription expire: 53.
Jim Mertz, Ephrata
CONVENTION CENTER, HOTEL PROJECT
In an article published over a year ago on your editorial pages, I asked:
"Is the downtown situation so unpromising that we need to do 'something', no matter how great the
subsidy, how much is put at risk, and how questionable the prospects for success?"
I then went on to describe several alternative
Click for complete article, (2091 words)
Published on June 26, 2006, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Claims downtown boat may leak
TO THE EDITOR: I would like to respond to J. Herbert Zug's letter ("Raising questions on downtown plan,"
Intell, June 20).
Zug uses the analogy "a rising tide lifts all boats" unless the boat has a hole in it. He asserts that those in
opposition to the proposed convention center and hotel project are in the boats with the leaks.
Unfortunately, it is Zug's argument that is doomed to sink. His letter takes liberty

Page 21 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
106 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 50 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
Click for complete article, (417 words)
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Article 137 of 2121, 677490000000.857213
Published on June 23, 2006, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Great divide laid bare at convention center mtg.
A steady stream of people at Ephrata Public Library stood behind a microphone stand Thursday night,
waiting for a chance to vent their feelings about the controversial hotel/convention center proposed for
downtown Lancaster. Some criticized the project. Others spoke in favor of it.
Whether people were "right" or "wrong," it was clear Thursday night the community remains strongly
divided over the project.
CI-15-10167
More than 60 people attended the
Click for complete article, (886 words)
Published on May 5, 2006, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
County study takes dim view of center
Developers of the proposed downtown convention center/hotel should consider "downsizing" the project or
finding an "alternate use for the site." If the current project is built as proposed, it will lose $1.3 million
per year.
So says the executive summary of a feasibility study of the $139.8 million project completed by PKF
Consulting at the request of the Lancaster County commissioners.
The summary was presented by PKF partner Dave Arnold
Click for complete article, (713 words)
Published on December 25, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
Ed Flick exemplifies the spirit of Christmas
Judy A.
Strausbaugh Ed Flick's office at Fulton Bank overlooks Penn Square, where all kinds of people traverse.
It's one of Flick's favorite views because he likes people.
Saturday morning, he was near his office helping people less fortunate have a Merry Christmas.
For the fourth straight year, the longtime banking executive volunteered to help fill and distribute 1,200
boxes of food for Lancaster County Project for the
Click for complete article, (751 words)

Article 185 of 2121, 777415


Published on December 19, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Rep. Pitts leads fight to derail slots parlor
A developer of the proposed slot-machine parlor in downtown Lancaster said Sunday more developments
related to the project could be announced as early as this week.

Page 22 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
107 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 51 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
Also, local leaders and U.S.
LANCASTER, PA
Rep.
***Electronically Filed***
Joseph Pitts are expected to convene today at Lancaster County Courthouse with the
aim
developing
Nov
20of2015
06:18AM
strategies to kill the $150 million project proposed for the Bulova Technologies building.
Andrew Gamber
"To develop a consensus on a game plan and to work together" is how
Click for complete article, (773 words)

Article 186 of 2121, 777659


Published on December 19, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
The Bulova building: Casino or federal courthouse?
The downtown Lancaster building where two local attorneys want to open a slots parlor is also among the
U.S. government's favored sites for a new federal courthouse, officials said today. CI-15-10167
"It's my understanding that people in the federal government are focusing on the Bulova building as the
best-suited site for a courthouse," Mayor-elect Rick Gray said this morning.
"My understanding is that it's along the way with
Click for complete article, (611 words)
Published on November 9, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Lancaster elects Gray as mayor
Election Day was Gray's day in Lancaster city.
Democratic challenger Rick Gray defeated two-term incumbent Mayor Charlie Smithgall Tuesday by 1,323
votes, based on unofficial results.
"There's going to be a new day in Lancaster," Gray told a cheering crowd gathered in a Hotel Brunswick
ballroom.
"Now we have the real task ahead of us the task of governing."
A defeated and tired-looking Smithgall
Click for complete article, (948 words)

Article 206 of 2121, 761167


Published on November 9, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Democratic ticket sweeps into City Council, takes 2 row offices
Lancaster city Democrats celebrated a sweep of City Council and two row offices Tuesday, upsetting a
strong Republican ticket that included three two-term incumbents.
"We're going to bring civility back to City Council," newly elected City Councilwoman Kendra Saunders said
Tuesday night at an election-night gathering in a ballroom at Hotel Brunswick.
The victory by Saunders, Louise Williams, Tim Roschel and Jose Urdaneta means, starting in January,
Click for complete article, (629 words)

Article 207 of 2121, 761414


Published on November 9, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)

Page 23 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
108 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 52 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
Gray's stunning win highlights big day for local Democrats How did he pull it off?***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
As Rick Gray emphasized late Tuesday night, today is a new day in Lancaster.
Andrew Gamber
With chants of "Sweep! Sweep! Sweep!," jubilant Lancaster City Democrats Tuesday night celebrated the
ousting of Republican Mayor Charlie Smithgall, all four Republicans on City Council, and Republican control
of the city controller and treasurer offices.
Gray, the Democratic mayoral candidate, rode a wave of change to an overwhelming victory.
He took 58 percent of the vote in his
Click for complete article, (1005 words)
Published on October 21, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Maybe Lancaster Square needs an exorcism

CI-15-10167

I've begun to wonder whether a curse has been placed on Lancaster Square.
Could it be that the ghosts of the original Brunswick Hotel, the old Lancaster YMCA and the Grand Theater
flattened by the wrecking ball in the 1960s to make way for so-called progress have gotten back at
us for our folly?
When it comes to Lancaster Square, it's almost eerie the way we can't get our act together. The paralysis
is maddening,
Click for complete article, (648 words)

Article 219 of 2121, 751343


Published on October 18, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
City, county take new looks at Lancaster Sq.
Lancaster city and county officials, recently at odds over projects in the city, are separately pushing for
new plans to revamp the east side of Lancaster Square, which has been widely criticized for being little
more than a concrete eyesore.
Mayor Charlie Smithgall said Sunday he has asked Hunter Interests Inc. of Maryland to submit a revised
edition of its 2002 Lancaster Square Master Plan and expects to hear from it this week.
Hunter's original vision was to put the
Click for complete article, (810 words)

Article 220 of 2121, 751605


Published on October 18, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
What's in store for Lancaster Square?
Lancaster City and county officials who have been sharply divided on Penn Square are both setting
their sights on Lancaster Square.
Lancaster Mayor Charlie Smithgall has asked Hunter Interests Inc., a Maryland consultant, to revise its
2002 Lancaster Square Master Plan. He expects an answer this week.
Meanwhile, county administrator Don Elliott says he has asked Franklin & Marshall College to survey
county residents about what they would like to

Page 24 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
109 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 53 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
Click for complete article, (364 words)
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Published on October 13, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Andrew Gamber
Bankruptcy filers need not go for broke
Though it may come as a surprise to some, the new bankruptcy law that takes effect Monday does not
allow bankers to collect a pound of flesh from debtors.
In fact, attorneys and bankers say the new law will seriously impact at most 10 percent of people filing for
Chapter 7 bankruptcy the most common type of bankruptcy filing in Lancaster County.
Chapter 7 offers debtors a clean slate and complete relief from their debts.
But fears that the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention

CI-15-10167

Click for complete article, (889 words)


Published on October 2, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
Build on success to revitalize city
Robert E. Field

In planning for the future it is important to avoid mistakes of the past; and building on current successes
is less risky than pursuing untested concepts.
With the proposed convention center/hotel, it is especially urgent that we avoid the mistakes that led to
the failure of Lancaster Square, or we may go down the same disastrous road.
The reasons for that failure, as given by former mayor and guest columnist Art Morris on Aug. 18, were
very wide of the mark.
When
Click for complete article, (796 words)

Article 225 of 2121, 744309


Published on October 1, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Host Resort has new owner
A Florida company with a track record of remodeling its holdings has bought the Lancaster Host Resort &
Conference Center for an undisclosed price.
Milestone Hospitality acquired the Lincoln Highway East property Sept. 23, according to a letter from the
motel's departing management company.
The 39-year-old motel in East Lampeter Township is a cornerstone of the county's tourism industry.
With 330 rooms, it's the county's
Click for complete article, (328 words)
Published on September 22, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Smithgall reopens campaign center at Brunswick for
run-up to the election
Touting his record as a crime fighter and job creator, Mayor Charlie Smithgall officially reopened his
campaign headquarters Wednesday at the Brunswick Hotel.

Page 25 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
110 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 54 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
Surrounded by his family and 25 supporters, the Republican mayor said, if re-elected,
he would continue
LANCASTER,
PA
to put pressure on criminals, push economic development and work hard to create
more jobs.
***Electronically
Filed***
"Eight years ago, I ran for mayor because I believed that the city was headed in theNov
wrong
direction,"
20 2015
06:18AM
Smithgall
Andrew Gamber
Click for complete article, (416 words)
Published on July 26, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Senate panel OKs funds for Lancaster Square, city garage
Lancaster Mayor Charlie Smithgalls plan to put the historic Rocky Springs Carousel in Lancaster Square
got more federal support Monday. The U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee voted to include $200,000
for the rehabilitation of Lancaster Square in its version of the Departments of Transportation, Treasury,
Judiciary, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Fiscal Year 2006 Appropriations bill,
U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter said Monday. The Pennsylvania Republican said the
CI-15-10167
Click for complete article, (482 words)
Published on July 13, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
The Brunswicks new Taste
THE WEEKLY DISH By E. Martin HulseJIM SWITZENBERG AND RON PFEIFFER have brought a new taste to
town. Taste at the Brunswick (151 N. Queen St., Lancaster, 397-4800) will open for dinner Friday with
eclectic city food, says Switzenberg, director of operations for Taste Catering, which recently partnered
with the Brunswick Hotel, owned by Hamid Zahedi. Tim Olivett, a Tavern on the Green and Moshulu alum,
was hired as chef, which returns the Hempfield graduate to the
Click for complete article, (728 words)

Published on May 22, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)


New look,hours for Brunswick eatery
The restaurant and bar in the historic downtown Hotel Brunswick is receiving a facelift.
Since the hotel was bought by Hamid Zahedi in February, the lounge and bar was closed and the
restaurant was only open for breakfast, mainly for hotel customers.
The lounge and bar reopened this weekend to the public with new paint and carpeting, and will be
completely renovated within the next two weeks with a new bar, dining and lounge furniture. Additionally,
lunch and brunch are expected to open
Click for complete article, (254 words)

Article 255 of 2121, 10238724


Published on May 18, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Library tax rejected; mayor, supporters prevail in city
City impact? Fall campaigns will target revitalization
Russ Miller called Luis Mendoza last night in hopes of burying the hatchet.

Page 26 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
111 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 55 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
The city GOP chairman said the party must reunify after Mayor Charlie Smithgall handily
defeated PA
LANCASTER,
challenger Mendoza by nearly a two-to-one margin in Tuesday's primary election.
***Electronically Filed***
Smithgall earned 65 percent of Republican votes.
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
"Luis has been a good Republican in the past and I hope we can get everyone on board
working
for a
Andrew
Gamber
victory in November," said Miller.
United the
Click for complete article, (808 words)
Published on April 20, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Brunswick owner seeks to revive movie house
The new owner of the Ramada Inn Brunswick is proposing to revitalize a portion of Lancaster Square into a
movie/performing arts theater.
But before Hamid Zahedi of New York begins, he wants to see more people invest inCI-15-10167
entertainment
attractions downtown, said a consultant during a press conference Tuesday on the square.
Thomas DePaul of the DePaul Group of Lancaster said he was hired by Zahedi to develop the project at the
former Eric Theater, located next to the Brunswick.
DePaul
Click for complete article, (413 words)

Article 266 of 2121, 10235702


Published on April 19, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Turn W&S into an IMAX theater
TO THE EDITOR:
It's hard to believe that the proposed convention center for Penn Square is still being considered. Can't
Penn Square Partners read? Common knowledge makes it clear that the convention center business is a
mess, "plagued by a taxpayer-funded burst of expansion and a continuing dearth of customers." To entice
business, convention center managers are giving space away.
I suggest that anyone who wants an honest appraisal of the
Click for complete article, (209 words)

Article 267 of 2121, 10235539


Published on April 17, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
Teaching retailers to capitalize on convention center
A national small-retailing expert plans to tell Lancaster city store owners how they can do more than just
scratch their niche.
John Ogden, a professor at Kutztown University's Small Business Development Center and a published
consultant on retail marketing, will visit Tuesday morning at the request of the Downtown Investment
District Authority.
Kelly Withum, who became director of the DID about three months ago, said the organization is
sponsoring Ogden's visit
Click for complete article, (633 words)

Page 27 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
112 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 56 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Article 268 of 2121, 10235545
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Published on April 17, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
Andrew Gamber
Following faith, D.R.E.A.M.S.
Entrepreneur who overcame hard times seeks to boost women, minority businesses.
An entrepreneur relatively unknown in Lancaster wants to introduce his venture by helping other small
businesses showcase what they have to offer.
Macajah Lee Brown Jr. is organizing the Women & Minority Business Expo, set for 4 to 10 p.m. April 28 at
the Brunswick Hotel, 151 N. Queen St.
Brown, 45, is founder of D.R.E.A.M.S. Minority Business Network, a one-man operation that looks for
partners who share his desire to boost entrepreneurial opportunities for women, blacks,

CI-15-10167

Click for complete article, (594 words)


Published on March 22, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Shaub accuses Henderson of attempting to kill hotel project
Lancaster County Commissioner Pete Shaub accused fellow Commissioner Molly Henderson this morning of
attempting to snuff out hope for a Penn Square hotel and convention center.
Henderson presented motions this morning that would direct county attorneys to look for alternatives to
the $129 million Marriott hotel and meeting center planned for the former Watt & Shand building.
That project remains on life support as lawmakers attempt to advance a compromise tax arrangement
Click for complete article, (433 words)

Article 280 of 2121, 10232443


Published on March 17, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
What about the Brunswick?
The new owners of Hotel Brunswick are trying to take advantage of the apparent failure of the planned
$129 million Penn Square hotel and convention center.
Hamid Zahedi, whose real estate partnership purchased the aging Brunswick in January, has suggested
convention center planners now turn their attention to his Lancaster Square property, two blocks north.
"All I am saying is if they're so hell-bent on having a convention center, this is another
Click for complete article, (514 words)

Hotel Brunswick aims to meet rising expectations


First renovated rooms in $4 million project ready to open this month.
Lancaster New Era
Published: May 04, 2007
12:40 EST

Article
Photos
Related
Share It

Page 28 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
113 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 57 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
Link Tags
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
By TIM MEKEEL
Andrew Gamber
The complete text of this article is no longer available online.

Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 16 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
At least they are finally going to get smart and move the check in and lobby to the first floor, queen and
chestnut corner. This hotel never had any street presence. One has to look hard to even know that it's
there! Who knew it had a pool?
They've had a high visible location, and never utilized it! seems like now they will. Hopefully it will spill
CI-15-10167
over to the rest of the square.

kwf1817
QUOTE(kwf1817 @ May 6 2007, 09:14 PM)
At least they are finally going to get smart and move the check in and lobby to the first floor, queen and
chestnut corner. This hotel never had any street presence. One has to look hard to even know that it's
there! Who knew it had a pool?
They've had a high visible location, and never utilized it! seems like now they will. Hopefully it will spill
over to the rest of the square.
This was an integral part of the late 1960s "Urban Renewal" plan. The expectation was that people would
walk INSIDE the "mall" from the parking garages to the shops.
When the current Brunswick was built, a big chunk of the first floor was taken up by an open public
walkway between Chestnut St. and Lancaster Square; this was not enclosed until many years later. Retail
stores were supposedly of a higher value than a hotel lobby, and indeed there was a bank in the
Brunswick building on N. Queen St. near Chestnut for a number of years. The "shopping mall" between
the Brunswick and the Hess Dept. Store at Queen and Chestnut was expected to be the pedestrian artery
(these "shops" still exist, being used as meeting rooms for the Brunswick). The second and third level of
the "shopping mall" included a large movie theater, later divided into two (this still exists, it is still
vacant).
Originally there were three pedestrian levels connected and surrounding Lancaster Square on all four
sides. There was also parking on the roof level, and it WOULD HAVE BEEN possible to drive from the Duke
St. garage over to the Prince St. garage at the top level! (I don't think it was ever implemented). Of
course this ended when the west side of the "concrete monstrosity" was demolished a few years after it
was completed. The Duke St. ramp to this parking level remained for many years, but was later
demolished to add a few street-level spaces next to the Duke St. parking garage. There are still lines for
parking spaces visible (from inside the Brunswick) on the roof of the movie theater above the "shopping
mall" on the east side of Lancaster Square.
The designers of this project actually expected the second level to be nearly as busy as street level. The
point is, the Brunswick was designed by "urban planners" who thought they knew better than people who
walk the streets. Of course, as we know now, what was once one of the three busiest commercial blocks in
Lancaster City is now a concrete wasteland (and yes, that DOES include Binns Park).
FYI, the Brunswick was originally designed to have two more floors than it does now. Rather than
redesigning the entire building, the top two floors were simply deleted. The structure is strong enough to
add these additional floors.

Page 29 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
114 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 58 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
Artie See
LANCASTER, PA
Its time for a little research. Someone needs to pull out the last set of rah-rah articles
run in the Filed***
LNP
***Electronically
when this fine establishment last went from the Hotel Brunswick to the Ramada Brunswick.
I
do
not
recall
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
the year but I certainly recall the content. The owner at the time was going to spend $XX
million
dollars
Andrew Gamber
then to bring it up to par and turn it around. LNP printed everything that the owner wanted them to print
whether it made any logical sense or not. What happened, more bankruptcy, more management
companies, and more trouble? When the mortgage holder finally got tired of the never ending cycle, they
cut their losses, ate half the debt, and go that asset off of their books to the current owner. Not only did
this story run then but I am sure that it ran in simlar fashion previous to that. What do we have now,
more of the sameoutrageous claims by owners trying to make themselves look good and a newspaper
monopoly that does not even ask questions. Let me suggest a couple. How many dollars per room is
allegedly being spent? How many dollars per room is the national average for new construction of a hotel
such as the Brunswick? What is the difference? How or why could someone substantiate the current claims
for what is merely cosmetic work, no bricks or mortar? I guess it is probably too much to ask though since
LNP was not willing to ask the same questions about the CC & hotel, why would they ask or do any
research for this one?

CI-15-10167

enlightened176
QUOTE(Artie See @ May 7 2007, 06:32 AM)
This was an integral part of the late 1960s "Urban Renewal" plan. ..... Of course, as we know now, what
was once one of the three busiest commercial blocks in Lancaster City is now a concrete wasteland (and
yes, that DOES include Binns Park).

Artie: Thanks for posting the historical facts of design-intent of this property. Interesting.
Hamid only paid $15 thousand/room for many reasons. 37 years of failure. How sad.
from the article: The Hotel Brunswick stands on a site that has been the location of a lodging facility since
the long-gone Hofnagle Hotel opened there in 1776. The current hotel opened in 1970. It was acquired by
a partnership led by Hamid Zahedi in 2005 for $3.4 million, according to newspaper files.

DimBulb
I was able to confirm that the Brunswick is indeed closed, except for a few rooms on weekends. Most of
the rooms are currently gutted.
The newspaper article is wrong.
Articles Tagged: Brunswick Hotel

Photos
Video
Map
Articles

WHERE LANCASTER BURIED ITS NORTH QUEEN MISTAKE


2008-05-04 00:21:00
CHIP SMEDLEY, Staff
Future explorers traipsing through the brickyards off Harrisburg Pike might believe they've discovered the
ruins of an ancient temple. They will encounter massive columns jutting out of the ground. Delicately
carved stone capitals that topped those columns, freed by soil erosion, peek ......
Downtown high-rise could cost $25M

Page 30 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
115 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 59 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
2008-03-20 12:16:00
LANCASTER, PA
BERNARD HARRIS, Staff
***Electronically Filed***
Plans for what could be a 10-story or more office, retail, museum, residential and parking
building
Nov 20garage
2015 06:18AM
in downtown Lancaster received initial approval Wednesday night. The plans for the proposed
building,
Andrew Gamber on
the former Empire TV parking lot at North Queen and East Chestnut streets, would......
Lancaster Square could see start of overhaul as soon as summer
2008-02-27 01:41:00
JENNIFER TODD, Staff
City officials said Tuesday that plans to demolish portions of Lancaster Square are being finalized and
pieces of the concrete eyesore could start coming down this summer.The proposed work would occur on
the east side of the square between the Hotel Brunswick and the Bulova buildin......
City businessman's killing sparks forum
2008-01-04 01:44:00
P.J. REILLY, Staff
CI-15-10167
Jose Urdaneta has been a Lancaster city councilman for the past two years.During that
time, he has been
frustrated by the general lack of interest many city residents have in getting involved in their
community.Thursday night was an exception, he said.The 50 people who turned......
Can candidates dance? You be the judge
2007-10-18 03:16:00
JEFF HAWKES, Staff
Latin music blasted from the nightclub's speakers, and dance instructor Oscar Restrepo, swiveling
smoothly, called out a cadence.Four middle-aged couples on the dance floor stepped and turned to the
up-tempo beat.Rick Calderon had opened his Rumbha nightclub, next to Hotel Bruns......
Lancaster Square: It's a dirty job, but
2007-08-30 02:39:00
JEFF HAWKES, Staff
Maybe Mike Rowe would be up for the job.You might know him as the wisecracking host of "Dirty Jobs" on
the Discovery Channel. One week he's picking up roadkill; the next he's feeling inside a cow for a fetus.
Rowe shows us the people who do these jobs, and he rolls up his sleeves, holds hi......
Hotel Brunswick checks in with downtown upgrades
2007-05-13 00:06:00
JUDY A. STRAUSBAUGH, Political writer
Developers of the $170-million convention center and hotel going up at Penn Square plan a kick-off
celebration this month. Meanwhile, renovation of a landmark hotel in downtown Lancaster is a towering
example of the revitalization momentum created by the convention-center project, say local eco......
Hotel Brunswick aims to meet rising expectations
2007-05-04 12:40:00
TIM MEKEEL
Around the Hotel Brunswick, Kevin Bergman sees a city on the rise. Now it's time for the hotel to join that
movement. The Queen and Chestnut streets landmark has started a renovation costing more than $4
million to invigorate the property. "It's no secret that our product......
14 seek convention center board seat
2007-03-21 01:28:00
Dave Pidgeon, Staff
Fourteen hopefuls have lined up to serve on the Lancaster County Convention Center Authority board,
among them one of the project's fiercest adversaries Ronald Harper Jr.At least half the candidates
seeking the seat have expressed opposition to the convention center and hotel p......
Columbia resident was Ford aide
2006-12-27 14:13:01
Tom Murse

Page 31 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
116 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 60 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
His voice went Boom, boom, boom. He didnt need a microphone. He was a champion,
remembers
LANCASTER,
PA
Kilmer, who is 80 and lives at St. Johns Herr Estate in Columbia. I had never heard
him like thatFiled***
before,
***Electronically
Kilmer said in an interview this morning. I said, That man over there is not the man
behind......
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Witness nabs suspect
2006-12-09 01:34:00
Brett Hambright
A 30-year-old Lancaster city businessman chased and caught a man who was trying to rob a woman
Thursday afternoon, police said.
Matthew Bryant, a salesman for Select Security, was working in his second-story office at 150 N. Queen
St. when he heard the woman's cry for help.
...
A 3-hour bickering brouhaha
2006-08-03 13:46:43
By Jack Brubaker
CI-15-10167
But the problem wasnt the heat, it was the rigidity. The individual county commissioners,
as well as their
packs of ardent supporters, have developed deeply entrenched positions on the proposed downtown
convention center/hotel and other subjects. So on Wednesday morning they talked at not w......
What about the Brunswick?
2005-03-17 14:05:27
Tom Murse
Hamid Zahedi, whose real estate partnership purchased the aging Brunswick in January, has suggested
convention center planners now turn their attention to his Lancaster Square property, two blocks north.
All I am saying is if theyre so hell-bent on having a convention center, this is another op......
New owner for Brunswick
2005-01-05 14:27:11
Bernard Harris And John M. Spidaliere
A real estate partnership headed by Hamid Zahedi, a northern New Jersey shopping center owner, is
expected to close on the 221-room hotel at the corner of Queen and Chestnut streets Jan. 31. Zahedi,
reached at his New York office this week, said he plans to renovate the 35-year-old hotel, but his......
Brunswick buy is out for now; 'timing' cited
2004-07-20 13:12:56
John M. Spidaliere
But that doesnt necessarily mean it wont buy the Lancaster Square hotel months from now. With the
threat of a new lawsuit in the air, four members of the authority voted unanimously to terminate
negotiations with the Massachusetts holding company that owns the Ramada Inn Brunswick Hotel, 151
N.......
Authority drops Brunswick deal
2004-07-20 11:18:47
P.j. Reilly
"That deal is dead," said Dave Hixson, executive director of the authority.
Calling the move a "business decision," Ted Darcus, chairman of the authority board, said the authority
wants to focus all its efforts on building a convention center in Penn Square.
"We didn't want......
Convention Center Authority likely to buy Brunswick
2004-07-14 13:50:54
John M. Spidaliere
But the executive director of the Lancaster County Convention Center Authority will wait to make that
recommendation for Monday. It appears from a community standpoint it would be the best course, said
Hixson. The authority will consider extending the due diligence period to buy the Lancast......
Reaction: Brunswick move is unrealistic

Page 32 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
117 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 61 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
2004-06-03 15:12:02
LANCASTER, PA
Bernard Harris
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
"I don't think it could be successful,'' Armstrong, a state senator who represents Lancaster
City,
said of a
Andrew
Gamber
proposal by the Lancaster County Convention Center Authority to buy the Brunswick Hotel in Lancaster
Square and possibly to build a convention center there.
"That's not a first-cla...
AV Specialist has launched a new regional version of the magazine covering the Islamic Republic
of Iran. The magazine uses much of the same editorial and advertising material that appears in
the Middle East edition but the Arabic content is replaced with Farsi content and an additional
section provides news and information on technologies and productions specifically relevant to
Iran. Local content is managed by Pejman Ghorbani, a young Iranian filmmaker based in Tehran.
The magazine is distributed through the Nashravaran Journalistic Institute in Tehran and is
available on subscription - as well as through newsstands and specialist retail outlets in Iran.
The indigenous film industry in the Islamic Republic of Iran is booming and home-grown
CI-15-10167
programming dominates local cinema and television, explains publisher Kevan Jones.
Over the
last few years weve seen a growing interest in our magazine from readers within the Islamic
Republic of Iran and our new regional version reflects the importance of this market within the
Middle East region.
Much of the editorial content in this new version has been commissioned from local journalists
and is specifically relevant to the region. For many years Iran has been isolated by language,
culture and political intrigue, says Nima Abu-Wardeh, a well-known media professional in the
Middle East and presenter of the BBCs weekly Middle East Business Report. Despite this, the
Iranian economy is buoyant and the country is playing an increasingly important role in the
commercial activity of the Middle East. Equally important, Iran has a well-established culture of
cinema and film production thats hungry for information on the latest video technologies. AV
Specialists new Farsi-language edition is likely to provide real value to film and TV professionals
in the Republic.
The first issue features several international manufacturers of film and TV production technology
keen to expose their products in this fast-growing market. The television and pro-video markets
in Iran represent a significant portion of our revenues in the Middle East but weve often found it
difficult to communicate with our customers in the Republic, says Robin Hood from Panasonic
Broadcast in the Middle East. AV Specialists new Farsi edition provides us an opportunity to reach
our customers and address them in a manner thats uniquely relevant to them.
The Nashravaran Journalistic Institute is confident that the latest offering from AV Specialist will be
a resounding success in the Iranian market. AV Specialist is the first and only broadcast and
pro-AV magazine to be distributed in the Islamic Republic of Iran, says Hamid Zahedi, managing
director of the Institute. It provides information thats just not available through any other
source and the fact that the magazine includes Persian content makes it uniquely relevant to our
market.
For US companies, trade with Iran is still off-limits but a powerful anti-sanctions lobby has
emerged in the US and the publishers are hopeful that the US trade embargo will soon be
relaxed. The US Dept. of Treasury does not prohibit the export of publications or informational
material to Iran, explains Kevan Jones, and even though the trade embargo remains in place,
the Iranian market presents an interesting opportunity for US manufacturers who see free trade
as the inevitable outcome of US foreign policy.
The first copies of the new Farsi-language version appeared in June 2005 but the publishers are
planning a major launch to coincide with the Tehran Short Film Festival taking place from 15-20
November.
Published on August 3, 2006, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)

Page 33 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
118 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 62 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
Two squares beat as one
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
The fortunes of Lancaster Square are tied to those of Penn Square, according to the owner
of Gamber
Hotel
Andrew
Brunswick. Hamid Zahedi wrote Wednesday that his hotel, based at Lancaster Square, could be renovated
to "four-diamond/four-star" quality, and its two-story concrete annex transformed into "two or three
restaurants ... plus entertainment for persons in their 30s and older."
Zahedi outlined his vision Wednesday in a letter to Lancaster County
Click for complete article, (724 words)

Article 2 of 17, 677490000000.874098


Published on August 3, 2006, Lancaster New Era (PA)

CI-15-10167

A 3-hour bickering brouhaha


Lancaster County government approached total meltdown Wednesday - one of the hottest days of the
year. But the problem wasn't the heat, it was the rigidity.
The individual county commissioners, as well as their packs of ardent supporters, have developed deeply
entrenched positions on the proposed downtown convention center/hotel and other subjects.
So on Wednesday morning they talked at - not with - each other for nearly three hours.
Jane Albright of East Lampeter
Click for complete article, (791 words)

Article 3 of 17, 812695


Published on March 10, 2006, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Fireworks essential for downtown event
Will "Celebrate Lancaster!" the city's popular Fourth of July celebration that's held downtown, end with a
bang or a whimper this year? That's a question for Mayor Rick Gray, who is studying whether the loud and
rumbling fireworks finale risks serious damage to historic homes, churches and other buildings or is a
particularly dangerous fire hazard.
A number of people think it is both.
They're primarily from the
Click for complete article, (512 words)

Article 4 of 17, 807912


Published on February 28, 2006, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Fireworks under fire
For the past eight years, Independence Day in Lancaster has meant vendors in the streets, open-air shows
downtown and fireworks over the Greist Building.
For some, however, it also has meant falling embers, rattling windows and structural damage.
Lancaster city residents tonight will get the chance to debate the merits of the annual fireworks display.
"The public ought to know about the attendant problems," Mayor Rick Gray said of the city's annual

Page 34 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
119 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 63 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
Click for complete article, (542 words)
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Article 5 of 17, 802337
Published on February 15, 2006, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Will fireworks move again?
Within a few months of taking office eight years ago, Lancaster's new Mayor Charlie Smithgall announced
plans for a Fourth of July celebration that would light up the sky.
The dazzling fireworks display at six times the cost of the annual Long's Park concert event could be
seen from suburbs a dozen miles away.
But it was the estimated 20,000 people who came downtown that were the most important to Smithgall.
CI-15-10167
His goal was to bring
Click for complete article, (860 words)

Article 6 of 17, 777415


Published on December 19, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Rep. Pitts leads fight to derail slots parlor
A developer of the proposed slot-machine parlor in downtown Lancaster said Sunday more developments
related to the project could be announced as early as this week.
Also, local leaders and U.S.
Rep.
Joseph Pitts are expected to convene today at Lancaster County Courthouse with the aim of developing
strategies to kill the $150 million project proposed for the Bulova Technologies building.
"To develop a consensus on a game plan and to work together" is how
Click for complete article, (773 words)

Article 7 of 17, 752947


Published on October 21, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Maybe Lancaster Square needs an exorcism
I've begun to wonder whether a curse has been placed on Lancaster Square.
Could it be that the ghosts of the original Brunswick Hotel, the old Lancaster YMCA and the Grand Theater
flattened by the wrecking ball in the 1960s to make way for so-called progress have gotten back at
us for our folly?
When it comes to Lancaster Square, it's almost eerie the way we can't get our act together. The paralysis
is maddening,
Click for complete article, (648 words)

Article 8 of 17, 751343


Published on October 18, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)

Page 35 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
120 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 64 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
City, county take new looks at Lancaster Sq.
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Lancaster city and county officials, recently at odds over projects in the city, are separately
pushing
for
Andrew
Gamber
new plans to revamp the east side of Lancaster Square, which has been widely criticized for being little
more than a concrete eyesore.
Mayor Charlie Smithgall said Sunday he has asked Hunter Interests Inc. of Maryland to submit a revised
edition of its 2002 Lancaster Square Master Plan and expects to hear from it this week.
Hunter's original vision was to put the
Click for complete article, (810 words)

Article 9 of 17, 729333


Published on August 26, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)

CI-15-10167

A green gem sparkles in center city


Wearing a knowing smile, John Hershey stood amid a crowd of about 300 people this morning for the
official opening of Lancasters Binns Park. The fountain he and his team at Derck & Edson, the Lititz
architectural firm, designed bubbled and hummed nearby. I feel like an expectant father, said Hershey.
It is exciting after years of planning to come to this point. The crowd of dignitaries and city and county
Click for complete article, (801 words)

Article 10 of 17, 719830


Published on August 8, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
The signs they are a-changin
Quantifying the oft-mentioned economic development created by Clipper Magazine Stadium isnt easy, but
Lisa Riggs has a suggestion. Riggs, director of the James Street Improvement Project, said you can see
things are looking up in the northwest section of the city simply by, well, looking up. If nothing else, signs
above businesses in the area, like A Homerun Location, Sluggers Pizza, and
Click for complete article, (1282 words)
Published on July 13, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
The Brunswicks new Taste
THE WEEKLY DISH By E. Martin HulseJIM SWITZENBERG AND RON PFEIFFER have brought a new taste to
town. Taste at the Brunswick (151 N. Queen St., Lancaster, 397-4800) will open for dinner Friday with
eclectic city food, says Switzenberg, director of operations for Taste Catering, which recently partnered
with the Brunswick Hotel, owned by Hamid Zahedi. Tim Olivett, a Tavern on the Green and Moshulu alum,
was hired as chef, which returns the Hempfield graduate to the
Click for complete article, (728 words)

Article 12 of 17, 10239134


Published on May 22, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
New look,hours for Brunswick eatery

Page 36 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
121 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 65 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
LANCASTER, PA
The restaurant and bar in the historic downtown Hotel Brunswick is receiving a facelift.
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Since the hotel was bought by Hamid Zahedi in February, the lounge and bar was closed
and the
Andrew
Gamber
restaurant was only open for breakfast, mainly for hotel customers.
The lounge and bar reopened this weekend to the public with new paint and carpeting, and will be
completely renovated within the next two weeks with a new bar, dining and lounge furniture. Additionally,
lunch and brunch are expected to open
Click for complete article, (254 words)

Article 13 of 17, 10235743


Published on April 20, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)

CI-15-10167

Brunswick owner seeks to revive movie house

The new owner of the Ramada Inn Brunswick is proposing to revitalize a portion of Lancaster Square into a
movie/performing arts theater.
But before Hamid Zahedi of New York begins, he wants to see more people invest in entertainment
attractions downtown, said a consultant during a press conference Tuesday on the square.
Thomas DePaul of the DePaul Group of Lancaster said he was hired by Zahedi to develop the project at the
former Eric Theater, located next to the Brunswick.
DePaul
Click for complete article, (413 words)

Article 14 of 17, 10232443


Published on March 17, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
What about the Brunswick?
The new owners of Hotel Brunswick are trying to take advantage of the apparent failure of the planned
$129 million Penn Square hotel and convention center.
Hamid Zahedi, whose real estate partnership purchased the aging Brunswick in January, has suggested
convention center planners now turn their attention to his Lancaster Square property, two blocks north.
"All I am saying is if they're so hell-bent on having a convention center, this is another
Click for complete article, (514 words)

Article 15 of 17, 10225298


Published on January 9, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
CATCHING UP ON THE NEWS
SUNDAY
Jan. 2 - Richard M. Scott, a World War II fighter pilot and a former mayor of Lancaster, died at 86. Scott
was shot down in combat and escaped from a German prisoner of war camp. He led the move to bring
minor-league baseball back to Lancaster. A memorial service Thursday was attended by hundreds.
MONDAY
Jan. 3 - James H. Guerin, sentenced in 1992 for his admission that he ran a $1.14 billion contract scam

Page 37 of 38

Theater at Hotel Brunswick,


December
2009
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Advanced
PleasPage Media
122 of Group
198
Monday, November
23,26,
2015
ENTERED AND FILED
Advanced Media Group
Page 66 of 142
Thursday, NovemberOFFICE
5, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
and $50 million smuggling ring involving his business, ISC, and its
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Click for complete article, (380 words)
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
Article 16 of 17, 10225024
Published on January 6, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Brunswick to change hands
The Ramada Inn Brunswick will soon have a new owner.
Hamid Zahedi, a northern New Jersey shopping center owner, said he and a group of partners are close to
finalizing a deal for the 221-room hotel. He said the purchase price is less than $3 million.
The tax assessment on the 1-acre property is $4.25 million, but Zahedi said the hotel requires significant
CI-15-10167
renovation, and the purchase price reflects the condition of the building.
"We'll have to fix
Click for complete article, (155 words)

Article 17 of 17, 10224984


Published on January 5, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
New owner for Brunswick
New York businessman buying Lancaster Square hotel, plans renovations.
The Ramada Inn Brunswick will soon have a new owner.
A real estate partnership headed by Hamid Zahedi, a northern New Jersey shopping center owner, is
expected to close on the 221-room hotel at the corner of Queen and Chestnut streets Jan. 31.
Zahedi, reached at his New York office this week, said he plans to renovate the 35-year-old hotel, but his
plans for the hotel and its annex along Lancaster Square are still undetermined.
"A lot of our plans are in limbo, because
Click for complete article, (846 words)

Page 38 of 38

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 123 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 67 of 142

Advisory, Inc.
11, 1755 Oregon Pike

Lancaster, PA 17601

717-569-4100

ENTERED AND FILED


PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Monday,
November
LANCASTER,
PA 23, 2015
***Electronically
Filed***
Thursday, November
5, 2015
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

FINANCIAL Y A I U l i E M E N I GIOUC 1 1 0

STANLEY J. CATERBONE
PRESIDENT

CI-15-10167

By: stan caterbone

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 1 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 124 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 68 of 142

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 2 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 125 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 69 of 142

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SONY JOINTcVENTUREPROPOSAL
CI-15-10167
"SONY CHALLENGE"
SONY JOINT VENTURE STATISTICS
INVESTOR MARKETING MATERIALS
LEGAL DOCUMENTATION
SCREEN PLAY (1ST DRAFT)

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 3 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 126 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 70 of 142

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

THE DIGITAL MOWE


A Joint Venture Proposal for
CI-15-10167

The Sony Organization

Developed by:
Stan J. Caterbone

Representing:
Tony Bongiovi
Power Station Studios
Flatbush Films
Garnillion Studios
Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,

beated in May ~f 1987

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 4 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 127 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 71 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

SONY CORPORATION
CI-15-10167

INTRODUCTION
SONY'S ROLE
TIMING
MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL STRUCTURE

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 5 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 128 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 72 of 142

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

INTRODUCTION
Tony Bongiovi and Power Station Studio are undertaking a project
that has the potential of revolutionizing the entertainment industry.
In the next few pages of this proposal, I will outline the elements
CI-15-10167
involved and how Sony can participate in this landmark event.
The technology of the recording industry has been advancing by
leaps and bounds. We have seen the advances from monaural
long playing record to stereo record to compact disc. Now we are
seeing tape systems that use digital rather than analog signals
appear, matching the quality of compact discs. What has
happened to the theatre's? The audio portion of a film, is as
responsible for the sensations one experiences at a motion picture
as the visual, yet many theatre's are still equipped only for mono
sound. Why is this? We feel there are two basic reasons.
1>

The relative high cost of upgrading a theatre to be able to


incorporate the advanced technologies of the audio
industry.

2> The lack of proper equipment for the film industry to


produce high quality digital audio tracks.
These two problems should not be addressed separately. There
is little motivation for upgrading until the product is available and
even less motivation to produce a product that can not be heard.
Tony Bongiovi and Ed Evans at Power Station in New York, have
now made it possible to address these problems simultaneously.
Their creation of the new "Power Station Digital Movie Sound"
(PSDMS), will not only enable the film industry to produce the
highest quality audio tracks for film, but will also allow theatre's to
upgrade their existing sound system at a minimal cost.
To introduce this revolutionary new sound, Bongiovi is in the
process of producing a film entitled "Mutant Mania", which is a
science fiction action horror film, shot in a small ocean resort town
in New Jersey. This film has many elements that make it perfect
for the introduction of PSDMS. The most prevalent of these being

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 6 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 129 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 73 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

the heavy music score by Bongiovi's latest band "French Lick".


Producing bands is definitely one of Bongiovi's fortes. Bongiovi
was instrumental in creating "Bon Jovi" who is probably the
strongest force in the rock and roll circuit today. "Bon Jovi's" third
album "Slippery When Wet", has sold more copies in a short
period of time than any other band in history.

CI-15-10167

Another is the fact that this is a horror film. The use of audio in
horror films is important to create tension, fear, excitement etc..
Using a horror film also lessens the influence the critics have on
the audience.
By the large this film will stand on it's own merits. Now add
PSDMS, and you have a potential block buster event.
How does Sony fit into all of this?

SONY'S ROLE
What we are seeking to do, is establish a distribution route in
which the message of Sony's new technology and its benefits can
be more easily and directly passed on to the consumer.

Picture a one or two minute commentary at the beginning of the


movie and home video, demonstrating the difference between the
quality of theatrical sound now and the new SONY/PSDMS sound.
This does two things. First, by demonstrating the difference in
quality of the new sound, you reinforce in the audiences mind that
it is much better, which as you will hear, there is little doubt.
Secondly it reinforces in the audience that Sony truly is a pioneer
of advanced innovative technologies.
In addition to the commentary, Sony will receive credits on the film,
ie. SONY/PSDMS. We will include in the copyright agreement that
Sony equipment must be used to be SONY/PSDMS.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 7 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 130 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 74 of 142

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Sony's name will also be strategically placed throughout the film.


This may be done in the form of billboards, advertisements, or
Sony equipment being utilized.
A commercial may be developed for n/ promoting both the film
and Sony's contributions to advanced audio techniques in the film
CI-15-10167
industry. This could be done as a joint venture between Sony and
the distribution company for the theatrical and video exhibition.
Inside every video tape that is sold, a coupon may be placed to
promote Sony products.
A full line of quality equipment may be SONY/POWER STATION
labeled for consumer use to enhance marketability of Sony
entertainment products.
Sony Video Software Corporation will receive right of first refusal
on all contracts for video and theatrical distribution. We will allow
Sony a preferred 5% margin under any other distributor for a
competitive edge.

TIMING
Timing is crucial in a project that touch so many different
areas.

MARKETING1DISTRIBUTION
Most of the industry by their own admission is at least two years
away from an effort to upgrade the sound in movie theatres. With
the SONY/PSDMS system, other companies may adapt easily and
economically to produce products with digital movie sound. With
companies adapting to this process, the future should see the
prominence of the SONY/PSDMS insignia much the same as you
see the Dolby insignia today. This will act as a constant reminder

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 8 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 131 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 75 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

to the public that Sony truly is a pioneer of advanced audio visual


technologies.
Sony will receive exposure in the professional market place by
having the SONY/POWER STATION equipment used in theatres
and studios to produce the SONY/PSDMS sound.
The video industry is a 56 billion dollar industry that is in needCI-15-10167
of
product. When you look at the potential for a product that will be
one of the first feature films to compliment the fast paced
VCR/Stereo Entertainment components, with a musical score that
may have enough merits of its own, you have an amazing potential
for distribution.
The Digital and Disc Industry has proven to be the future standard
for recording and playing. Because of the relative newness of the
digital format, there are more people who have yet to experience
the digital sound. With the high exposure that will come from this
project, this could be the first time ever people hear digital. How
many people? 1 - 10 - 50 - 100 million?
What will be their first reaction? I need to buv a Disc Plaver!
Who's name will they think of first? SONYIPSDMS!

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Bongiovi and Evans at Power Station have developed a
revolutionary hybrid mixing console to penetrate the video post
production market. This console was developed to enable
engineers to produce high quality audio tracks for the film industry
as well as the recording industry. This new console utilizes an
automation system that can be used by both industries. This new
console is especially atractive to the film industry, as it will greatly
reduce production costs since mixing costs in a recording studio
are much less. At present the console that is being used is a
bastardized system that utilizes components from many different
pieces of equipment, from a number of different companies, of

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 9 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 132 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 76 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

which Sony is one. Because we already have a working model of


this console, it would take very little time for a finished product to
be manufactured that could carry the SONY name.
The other piece of equipment that is essential to the PSDMS
process, is the box that enables the laser disc to automatically
read the synchronization track encoded on the film. This piece of
CI-15-10167
equipment can be produced at an extremely low cost. It is this
low cost and the fact that the theatres will not have to replace their
present projectors that make digital movie sound a reality in 1988.
We feel that with consumers demanding the same quality audio at
theatres, as they have become accustomed to with their home
entertainment systems, theatre owners will have little problem
investing the nominal amount of dollars involved, to upgrade their
theatres for digital audio. This investment could be as low as
$1000. With the cost being so low, the distribution company may
want to consider bearing the burden of this cost, if the theatre
owners agree to show Bongiovi's next three films.

FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
SONY will commit four million dollars for the production of
Bongiovi's film to be released in 1988.
We would like SONY to commit fifteen million for three to four
future products that will follow the same format as the first, so that
Bongiovi and SONY will position themselves as the pioneer and
leaders in the industry. This will not allow competition to gain
access to the marketplace until we are all firmly situated and
profitable.
Sony will only pay for expenses to produce 60 second spots.
Tony and Power Station will utilize any and all services to help
produce the spot and will allow reimbursement for only true costs
with no mark up including all of Tony's time which will be free.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 10 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 133 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 77 of 142

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Power Station and Power Productions I will receive a negotiated


percentage from all revenues generated from the merchandizing
campaign of the SONY/POWER STATION products and the sale
that may result to other film studios utilizing Sony/POWER
STATION equipment in the PSDMS System.

CI-15-10167
We will receive four deluxe entertainment systems - Television,
VCR, Stereo, Etc. that is top of the line to help during the
production of the film.
The purpose of the above and all aspects of this Proposal is to let
the separate entities involved maximize their profits for their
respective talents; Bongiovi in film and music production and Sony
in manufacturing and distribution of equipment and merchandise
and later video and film distribution.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 11 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 134 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 78 of 142

I THE MIGHTY YEN AND FIERCE COMPETITION ARE FORCING IT INTO NEW MARKETS
CI-15-10167

here he is, sitting on the floor of


his office with three remote controls in his hand, listening to a
Beethoven symphony a t high volume.
He recorded the symphony from a
broadcast of a recent Vienna Philharmonic concert in Tokyo, and now he's
putting the tape to good use. As much
as he likes music, Akio Morita likes trying out new stereo gear even better.
Morita is 66, and the last flecks of
black long ago vanished from his silver
hair. Although he's spending less time
@ these days in his cluttered, wood-paneled
chairman's office a t Sony Corp., it's
" clear
that Morita still provides much of
64 BWSINES W

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

E 1,1987'

the spark that has made the company


synonymous with the success of postwar
Japan: innovation, shrewd marketing,
and quality. As executives repeatedly
dash in for consultations, Morita patiently explains why one set of speakers he's
checking out doesn't quite have the Sony
sound.
Sony. The very name speaks volumes
about the company. It comes not from a
Japanese word that foreigners might
find W u l t to pronounce, but from
sonus, the Latin word for sound, fine
tuned for Japanese tongues. The name
symbolizes the company's origins in its
pioneering tape recorders and transistor

'

radios. I t also has come to signify the


international orientation among so many
mightjly successful Japanese companies.
Some 70% of Sony's sales come from
outside Japan.
~
D DOWN.
E
Recently, though, Sony
has become one of the most visible symbols of trouble in Japan. Like other Jap
anese companies in businesses ranging
from autos and steel to electronics and
computers, Sony's world has been
turned upside down. The dramatic rise
of the yen has cramped its ability to
compete in export markets. Protectionist
sentiment is growing in the U. S. and
COVER STORY

Page 12 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 135 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 79 of 142

back like never before. Far East competitors, such as Taiwan and South Korea,
are exploiting their lower costs, and
U. S. and European companies are
achieving efficiency gains and improvements in quality.
The high yen--endaka in Japaneseis slamming the nation's exporters two
ways. Foreign competitors with costs d e
nominated in dollars or French francs
have more room to undercut Japanese
companies on prices, and a dollar's
worth of sales is worth less in yen. Measured in dollars, Sony's U. S. sales rose
24% last year. Measured in yen, they
were down 11%. "The falling dollar has
produced a nearly 50% tax on us," complains Morita.
Overall, the numbers tell a disappointing story. Worldwide sales slipped ?%, to
$82 billion, in the fiscal year that ended
last October, while earnings from operations fell a stunning 75%. Earnings declined another 56% for the five months
ended in March from a year earlier.
Archrival Matsushita Electric Industrial
Co., by contrast, endured a more manageable 44% drop in operating earnings
last year.
For Sony, endaka is like a drought
that follows a plague of locusts. The
challenges facing Morita and his handpicked president, former opera singer
Norio Ohga, have become even more
daunting than they already were.
BETA ~ O C K Competition
.
m consumer
electronics is brutal. After coming up
with such hits as W i n TVS and
Wallanan tape players, Sony watched
the hottest market of the 1980s,pass it
by. The company dung to its Betamax
videorecorder fmmaturhile +hp
the world switched to VAS. That s
s
was costly, and the experience helped
embolden competitors. They no longer
wait to see whether Sony's innovative
products suceeed. Rivals that took about
two years to come up with their own
U. S. versions of the Walkman now r e
spond to new Sony products in months.
And the rising quality of competitors'
products has narrowed the advantage
that once permitted the company to
build a successful advertising campaign
around the simple phrase: "It's a Sony."
To make matters worse, some of the
most troublesome competitors are in
South Korea or other Asian countries
where costs are lower.
Sony has fought back. Shortly after
becoming president in 1982, Ohga set a
goal of reducing Sony's dependence on
consumer electrbnics by getting 50% of
sales from nonconsumer products by
1990, compared with 15% a t the time.
Ohga has also served notice that executives a t Sony factories must cut manufacturing costs beyond the 10% annual
reductions of recent years. 'We need
quantum leaps in cost reduction," he

CI-15-10167

...
AND DlVERSlFlCATlOH
...ERODES
A STROW6 YEN
IS OFF SCHEDULE
EARNINGS.. .

'

35

- - - -

10-

'0

- - - - -

NONCONSUMER PRODUCTS
AS PERCENT OF TOTAL SALES

'82

'83

'84

'85

'86

J
DATA. M l l Y CQI.

says. To reduce its vulnerability to fluctuations in the yen and to become more
responsive to its customers, Sony is expanding its substantial manufacturing
operations overseas. And Sony clings almost defiantly to one. of the company's
most distinguishing characteristics: a research and development budget that
amounts to about Wo of sales. Rival Matsusfiita spends only 4%.
Even for a company as innovative as
Sony, the changes are not coming easily.
"Our people are working very hard,"
says Morita. And all 'that hard work is
carrying Sony into some unfamiliar territory, where the risk of missteps is

high. The company's push into nonconsumer areas, such as computers and image processing, has been such tough going that Sony will not meet its timetable
for diversification.
Other changes Could be even more
traumatic. In some areas, Sony is abandoning its time-honored, go-it-alone philosophy. It is sharing its technology with
other companies, for example, in an effort to create industry standards for
new products and to avoid another Betamax. Sony is also becoming more of a
street fighter. It is pushing harder for
larger shares of the markets for products, even if it means paring profit mar-

COVER STORY

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 13 of 76

BUSINESS WEEKIJUNE 1,1987 6S

2
8
e

$
k

3
-1

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 136 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 80 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

the company has avoided any serious


damage from the cross-fire between Tokyo and Washington. Its semiconductors

CI-15-10167

pany, which has 701 employees, is one


among a host of small regional s&
brewers in Japan. Morita & Co. also
makes miso, a fermented soybean
paste used in soups and sauces, and
shogu, or soy sauce. Under the management of Kyueaemon Morita, the
business provided a comfortable life
for his son Akio and three other children in Nagoya, an industrial city 224
m i southwest of Tokyo.
As the eldest son, Akio was expected
to take over Morita & Co. Instead, after World War 11, Morita, then 25,
threw in his lot with business novices
Masaru Ibuka and Tamon Maeda to
start Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo, or Tokyo
Telecommunications Engineering Co.
Unable to get a bank loan for their
struggling company, the trio turned to
Akio's father, who repeatedly provided
money through Morita & Co. in return
for stoek in the new venture.
AT worn r e ~ o ~
~ TaK evolved into
Sony. And Morita & Co., with Akio's
brother Kuzuaki a t the helm, has seen
some modest transformations of its

chief are legion. Even though Congress


in April rejected a oneyear ban on the
ultrahigh-fidelity digital tape recorders
recently introduced in Japan, legislators
are likely to accomplish the same objective by other means. Congress is dawdling over legislation to require that the
new products be equipped with devices
that prevent them from duplicating
tapes or records, a provision sought by
the recording industry. Richard L.
Sharp, president of Circuit City Stores
Inc., isn't expecting digital tape machines to be in his stores for a t least a
year, as Sony and other manufacturers
await a clear reading on the legislation.
Despite Sony's woes, Morita is as eager and enthusiastic as ever. He manages to sound upbeat about both the
company's functional-looking, high-performance Profeel Pro TV,which is selling well, and the 8mm handheld video
camera, which is struggling. "This year
we will recover our profits, and next
year will be a much better year," he
says. Most analysts agree that Sony has
a t least halted the slide that has

COVER STORY

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 14 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 137 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 81 of 142
-

--

- -

ers, and by the time he left for Berlin to


study voice, Morita signed him on as a
consultant. After rebuffing several entreaties by Morita to forsake his opera
career for a full-time position at Sony,
Ohga finally relented in 1959. Before b e
ing named president, however, he served
a 23-year apprenticeship that included
running Sony's tape recorder division
and a record company joint venture with
CBS Inc.
ow THE STUMP. Ohga's growing authority allows Morita more freedom for the
ambassadorial role he loves so much. He
spends about a third of his time a t Sony
these days. The rest is devoted to trips
overseas for such things as speechmaking or promoting his book, Made in Japan, and to his ceremonial functions in
Japan. Last year he became a vice-chairman of Keidanren, the Japacese federation of economic organizations.
For all his outside activities, Morita
still makes sure he gets involved in the
crucial decisions a t Sony. When it came
time to price the portable compact disk
player, for example, Morita decreed that
it be priced a t less than 50,000 yen,
about $200 a t the time. Even though the
player cost more than that to make then,
Morita correctly anticipated that the low
price eventually would generate enough
sales to provide the volume production
that would trigger economies of scale-and profits. The episode shows how
Sony is now pursuing market share
more diligently. I t is also an example of
how Sony is responding to its experience
with Betamax, the world's first home
videorecorder. This high-profile product
laid bare the company's strengths and
its weaknesses.
As conceived, Betamax was a classiciflustration of Sony's founding philosophy of looking for new markets where
bigger, wellestablished companies were
not a threat. The company correctly
foresaw the immense latent demand for
a machine that could make and play
back home videotapes. But then it ceded
the market to others by refusing to yield
when the VHS format, -first developed by
Victor Co. of Japan, provided longer r e
cording times and gradually became the
industry standard. Sony still insists that
its Beta recorders provide a superior picture. But a shrinking number of customers-currently about 5% of all buyersare buying Beta.
MlDuFe CRISIS? Some analysts think Betamax goes a long way toward explaining the new directions a t Sony. "The
Beta experience was so searing, so
threatening, that it forced a major revision in the way the company positions
itself," says James C. Abegglen, a Tokyo-based management consultant. One
example: Sony has relaxed its tradition
of sticking to the expensive, high-profit
end of the market by coming out with a
COVER
STORY MEDIA GROUP
ADVANCED

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Page 15 of 76

BUSINESS WEEKfJUNE 1,198797


05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 138 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 82 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

ing," says Neil Vander Dussen, president of Sony Corp. of America.


The efforts in the U. S. and around
the world are producing some pieces of
Sony's vision of the future. Sony was
the first Japanese company with a powerful 32-bit desktop computer, which is
the heart of its engineering workstation.
It has quickly become a major producer
of full-feature telephones in Japan. Sony
also has taken the lead with the 3%-in.
floppy disks and drives that are bidding
to replace
5%-in. disks as standard
CI-15-10167
equipment on computers.
Perhaps the most impressive marriage
of video with the computer is what Sony
calls interactive video. Sterling Drug
Inc.'s Winthrop Pharmaceuticals unit
uses a van with a customcrafted version
to provide simulated demonstrations of
how its products work. The system lets
a doctor "treat" a patient with heart
failure. The doctor sees his patient going
to the emergency room, while the system provides the patient's case history
and vital signs. The patient's recovery
depends on the doctor's response to onscreen questions and choices.

one of the reasons

sales, executives now concede their time


ers of the disks themselves.

sharing technology and

2
P

eE
.8BVSlNESS WEEKIJUNE 1,1987

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

COVER STORY

Page 16 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically
Filed***
Such a move would send a strong sigNov
20
2015
06:18AM
nal that Sony has reached a new, more
Andrew
Gamber
mature phase of development
after
riding the crest of Japan's postwar economic miracle. In essence, Sony's tradition of
searching for gaps is another way of
seeking market niches-a classic approach for young companies. To keep
growing, bigger companies must also
learn to defend their existing markets
while broadening their product line.
Mastering new skills is never easy. But
Morita, now an inveterate skier, didn't
even try the slopes until he was 60.
There's no reason Sony can't accomplish
a similar feat in the business world.

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 139 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 83 of 142

against the dollar since September, 1985,


Sony was able to raise prices only about
15% in the U. S.
Moving plants overseas is only the
first step. The more difficult task will be
to integrate planning and research and
design internationally, too. But if an international staff is any measure, Sony is
well along in the integration process. Of
7,000 employees in the U. S., for example, only 150 are Japanese. Sony, virtually alone among Japanese companies, has
stuck to a policy of giving the top job in
its foreign operations to a local national.
Before long, it may become the first major Japanese company to name a foreigner as a director. A leading candidate
is Jack Schmuckli, the head of Sony's
European operations.

a strong yen. Even though having large


overseas sales makes Sony more vulnerable than most Japanese industrials, it is
already among the most international of
companies. Foreigners own 23% of its
stock, which is traded on 23 exchanges
around the world. Sony also moved early
and fast into local manufacturing. It
makes TV sets in Bridgend, Wales, as
well as in San Diego. It makes compact
disks in Terre Haute, Ind., and in Salzburg, Austria. All told, 20% of Sony's
manufacturing is overseas. It aims to
increase that to 35% by 1990. Such globalization will help Sony earn its revenues
and pay its bills in the same currency,
rather than paying workers in yen and
logging sales in a depreciating dollar.
While the yen was appreciating 50%

By Larry Armstrong i n Tokyo, with


Christopher Power and G. David Wallace
in New York

CI-15-10167

OHSOWE: EVERYTHING FROM A $32 BOX tO A $450 RECORDER WlIM-T

f all the problems besetting


Sony, the two most frustrating
are how to deal with copycat
competitors and how to mute the imp a d of the rising yen on manufadur
ing costs. But Sony has shown it can
rise to the challenge. Its experience
with the Walkman is proof of that
After Walkman's debut in July, 1979,
Sony was not about to bask in the new
product's almost instant success. Within months, Sony audio engineer Kozo
Ohsone was heading a team trying to
come up with a better Walkman. Ohsone carved a block of wood that was
25% smaller than the okiginal design
and gave it to his engineers as a model.
The engineers grumbled, but they
buckled down. By February, 1981,
Sony was shipping thousands of Walkmans that were smaller, sounded betr
ter, and had nearly 50% fewer parts
than Walkman I.

1
O ' E R STORY
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

lion of the 27 million Walkrnans it has


made, prices run from a plain-vanilla
playback-only model for $32 to a
souped-up $449.95 version that boasts
tapedeckquality sound and records as
well as plays.
Sony has used its image as a technology leader to gain a hammerlock on
the lucrative premium end of the market. Walkman is the only portable ste
reo offered by the tony L. L. Bean mtalog. Emphasizing that it is "made by
Sony in Japan, like 'Mercedes Benz,
made in Germany"' gives Walkman
"intangible added value," says Ohsone,
now audio group director.
p u n n o FOR KEEPS. All Walkman
products are manufactured in Japan.
And despite the soaring yen, Walkman
production is the exception to Sony's
strategy to move more production
overseas. Even though the soaring yen
squeezed profits, Sony says it still
made money on the $432 million worth
of Waikmans it sold last year. One reason: a decision four years ago to create
a low-price model specifically for the
U. S. That forced Sony to automate
production drastically and design a
new model that cut more than 90% off
production costs partly by integrating
the playing mechanism onto the printi
ed circuit board. The basic $32 Walkman has become Sony's bestiselling
model in the U. S.
Analysts think Walkman's go-go
gears are coming to an end. But Sony
disagrees. "Of the 4 billion people in
the world, we estimate we could reach
600 million," says Ohsone. That may be
an overstatement But then, as long as
Sony keeps gripding out new versions,
there seems to be no shortage of people eager to tune in.

SOUND

Sony continues to dominate the $1.3


billion buslness with a 30% share of
personal tape players sold worldwide.
The reason: "It has been more inventive than the others," says stock analyst Alan BeU of Salomon Brothers
Asia Ltd. Walkman firsts include
Dolby noise reduction in 1982 and a
rechargeable battery in 1986.
Sony's inventiveness shows in more
than technology. To keep Walkman
fresh and to make it appealing to more
customers, Sony churns out new models to suit virtually every taste and
wallet. So far it has introduced about
100. Headed for the beach? Take the
solar-powered, waterproof Walkman.
Tennis, anyone? Here's an ultralight
radio-only model that attaches to a
sweatband. Want concertihall sound?
Slip on the oversize headphones of a
deluxe Boodo Khan. In the U.S.,
where Sony has sold more than 13 mil-

By Amy B

I
Page 17 of 76

in Tokyo

E5

11 #z

BUSINESS WEEKIJUNE 1,1987 68


05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 140 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 84 of 142

STATISTICS FOR SONY DEAL


1.

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Power Station

1% $1 Million in 1987 in Revenues

I. Bon Jovi Tony's creation

a. Format
b. Mixing
Sold 9 million albums in 6 months

CI-15-10167

2. Power Station Hiah Tech Award Last 4 Years


Best in World By Peers!

3. 4 5 Grammys in 1987 Recorded there Steve Winwood


Others: Jagger,, B. Joel, Springsteen, Diana Ross, Madonna,
J. Lennon, on and on.
4. Tony

- Multi Track Recording

Defied Theory
Designed Sound Voyeger
Produced Star Wars Album Mixed

5. French Lick MTV may sign Free Promotion


II. Technology
1. First Video, film, tv in digital. All first for full entertainment

2. Kodak and Mitsubish Not till end of Decade

3. Dolby Sony/PSDMS

- $10,000 per license to any tv, film, video, etc.

4. Only mix board that will mix albums/video's

Sell to all recording and film studios $300,000

- $500,000 per

console.
5.

Sony spends 9% of gross revenue on R & D


9% of billions 2 = $180,000,000

6. Put Sony 5 years ahead of strategic plan

Disc players Only 23% of consumers currently own a disc player.


First time to hear for how many?

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 18 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 141 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 85 of 142

Filmpideo
1. 23,000 theaters to sell system

2. First will sell movie and video


Add French Lick

3. Top Gun sold 9 million @ $30.00


$270,000,000

- $60.00 per video

CI-15-10167

4. Horror International Fihn $20 $60,000,000

Pay N,Cable, N ?
IV.

Commercial 180 Sec Commentary

- $8,000,000 for commercial


Visa Demonstration $2 Million - $6 Million
Sony $4,000,000

Pepsi Paid $8,000,000 60 Second in front of "Top Gun" video.

V. Merchandise Private Label


Power Station Beach Line
In movie, free by original designer and owner

- "Hana Ten" swim wear

Power Station Electronics Line/Sony


Best recording in world

- is it good?

Beach Accessories
Promotion in movie, video,

Sell all of above


Video

- Mail Order, Stores

VI. Sony
I. Needs help

a. Low profits
b. Beta Bust
2. Best name electronics Manufacture

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 19 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 142 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 86 of 142

3. Film and video distribution (new)


4. Willing to work together

a. Share tech
b. Joint venture

c. Horizontal distribution
5. Horror Elements and PIS name already international

CI-15-10167

Deal would involve:


I. Retail electronics division
2. Professional electronic

3. Film distribution

4. Video distribution

Star Wars $2 Billion in 10 Years from all


revenues

30% 50% = $600,000,000


Tony said 50/50

All costs $4 Million

New Film studio?/with Sony


Deal worth 100,000,000 Now??
Would Kodak or Mitsubish like deal?
Will Sony let this deal go to competition?

No Beta
PERFECT ENDING: Profits and Respect

ereation 4111/87
11:00

'

- 1:00 a.m.

Stan 98%

1% Scott Call Ron Gell


Research Sony

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 20 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 143 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 87 of 142

1% Marcia Sony give 4 million

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Raise 15 Million
Call Head of video distribution

Merchandising Hang Ten Off


Kodak
Sony
Difference test visa add in

CI-15-10167

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 21 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 144 of 198


Technology
Advanced
Media Group
Page 88 of 142

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Beyond the Bijou


SOPHISTICATED FILM TECHNOLOGIES
AND FUTURISTIC FORMATS ARE REDEFINING
THE NATURE OF COHTEMPORARY MOVIE THEATERS.

BY JIM PETTIGREW JR.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 22 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 145 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 89 of 142

n a world that at times seems defined


by incompatibility, there is one interest which most of us have in common a passion for the movies. And this love
of the cinematic fantasy world shows no
signs of dissipating. Different trends
may appear, such as the VCR explosion,
but upon examining the world of contemporary cinema, one fact becomes
readily apparent - the movies are not
going away. Neither, according to industry leaders, are those esteemed hideouts
of escapism - the theaters.
Though movie theaters are here to
stay, there is a great deal of debate currently going on inside the showcase, or
exhibition end, of the film world. Some
of it concerns topics such as changing
image, and a considerable amount of the
debate relates directly to technology.
The path of events that set the stage for
this situation contains a number of key
elements.
Beginning in the early 1970s. the
movie-theater industry in the U.S.
slowly slipped into what may be called a
technical rut. There were tremendous advances in home-audio technology, but
the exhibition business did not really
keep up.
There was also a trend toward "multiplex" cinema facilities - not an inherently weak mpketing idea - but their
early manifestation didn't prove tenibly
successful. The first multicinemas were
cramped, had very small screens, and
ambient sound many times bled over
from next door.
In the spring of 1977, George Lucas
produced a film that would have a revolutionary. impact on the exhibition industry. It was released to theaters carefully
picked for certain technical standards.
Besides the well-known special effects
and cinematography, Star Wars boasted
a soundtrack in Dolbya stereo. It was
played over an advanced audio system
filled with new designs, including a
"subwoofer" that
-

The film also brought fresh attention


to the large-frame 70mm format. This
expensive but vastly superior process
had been used in earlier landmark
movies (Lawrence of Arabia, Patron)
but had fallen out of favor in Hollywood.
With a new audio standard established
by the Lucas blockbuster, the cinema industry moved into the 1980s - and a
whole, new set of business realities,

coupled with a feverishly expanding


foreground of technological develop
ments.
Clearly, the industry had to adapt and
change. The situation was brought to a
head by the growth of home video, but
that trend was only a part of the whole
arena. Faced with this challenge, the theater industry began what is now a recognizable set of changes to "remainstream"
itself. (The latest studies, incidentally,
show a kind of reverse effect from the
home-movie phenomenon; it's actually
sending patrons back to theaters, seeking
favorite titles in full-blown film environments.)

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday,
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Fromthtprojtcbknroomtothcbox
oflke, technology is IntWating
the d m house. Developed by
Douglas Tnrmbull, opposite, Showscan@,
equipped with a c o m w e d motion
control system and 70mm fllm, amazed
audiences at Expos '85 and '86. Above,
computerized ticketing and central-data
systems, like thou dewdoped by Pacer
Coqxxaion, are also coming into
the pkture.

SKY May 1987 23


ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 23 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
FILED
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Page 146 of 198
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Advanced Media Group
Page 90 of 142 SYSTEMS UNDERGO
Thursday,
November 5, 2015
ALP TWX-INSTALLED
RIGID
LANCASTER, PA
GERIIFICRPC6N APCD ARE THEN TESTED
EVERY
***ElectronicallySIX
Filed***
WBHTHS ao ENSURE QUALITY ADHERENCE.
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Zl33 Oak Industrial Dr. N.E.


Grand Rapids, MI 49505
Ton-Free 1-800-253-0882
I'd k e to know more about

Today, the theater repositioning procAccompanied by an advanced audio


ess takes a number of poses, including
design from THX Sound Systems, a
division of Lucasfilm Ltd., an entire film
better s o u n k
_sensible design,
rests on a platter and feeds through a -cleaner halls. a y m overall push to
projector without the projectionisthaving
reenergize the "experience" vital to
to use two ~rdectors.
moviegoing. "Theater companies are
building at record numbers, by the way,"
notes Glenn Berggren, vice president of
of Azusa,
Optical ~adiationCor~oratidn
California, one of the world's largest
suppliers of theater equipment. "They
want to make them better, not only as operations are concerned - breakdowns,
etc. -they'd also like to have an effective
theater that lets the public know they're
modem, better than the ones built five,
ten years ago."
Theaters are now utilizing computerized ticketing and central-data systems, such as those developed by Pacer
Corporation of Bothell, Washington.
The integrated Pacer system instantaneously gathers all sales data for the cashintensive business, compiles it, and the
information is uploaded nightly by automatic modem to central offices. "Our

Tenyberry award jewelry programs.


Our company logo or my business
card is attached. Please send free
sample artwork and a no-obligation
quote on an:
Award Ring Program
EmblemJewelry Program
17 Please call - I have some questions.
Name
Title

Address
CitylStatelZip
Telephone Number

24 SKY May 1987


ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 24 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 147 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 91 of 142

system opens up the possibilities of credit-rard and off-site ticket purchasing,"


s Keith Myers, Pacer's marketing
v
president. "This may reach a whole
different segment of affluent consumers
- r-d even influence the kind of movies
tt are made. "
nis trend is well characterized by
numerous showcases across the country.
@
example is the General Cinema
c, plex inside Merchants Walk, a north
4-.mta mall. There, Cinema One features an advanced audio design from
T < Sound Systems, a division of
L asfilm Ltd. in San Rafael, Californla. "Patrons don't really articulate it,"
exvlains theater manager Steve Crisp,
s' ~ i n off
g the loudspeaker system and
lrily insulated walls, "but they know
wnat they want in a film experience
torlay, and sound is verv"-i
6 e healthy sign that experts point to
i: le influence exerted by firms such as
THX Sound Systems and the Theatre
A1;:nment Program (TAP), both compo7 ts of Lucasfilm Ltd. All THX-ins led systems undergo rigid certification and are then tested every six months
tc nsure quality adherence. TAP vigora ly encourages high standards and
d rogue between suppliers and theaters.
"We are targeting theater managers
a personnel with seminaft," says Kim:t ly Strub, marketing director of the
1..:ater Operations division at Lucasfilm. 'These will help them answer quest IS about film presentation - soundt~ :ks, how they're made. Lots of times
p o p l e will have questions about how
films are made, and the only people that
t' y have to turn to are the theater pers ~nel.We're trying to make sure they
are informed and can answer public
ollestions - and also realize how import t their roles are in the film chain."
Zurrently, amid the film exhibitors'
concerted push to modernize, there is an
aP-elerating debate in both the equip
r nt and showcase fields about what
t hnical form the near future will take.
The issues must be set in context within
-rowing array of spectacular new tech1 ogy, film formats, and even new apI laches to the filmic experience.
Two of the central topics now being
(' Sated with increasing fervor in the in-

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

'

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 25 of 76

05.03.2007

SKY May 1987

25

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 148 of 198
cial-effects possibilities - as well as deONE
SYSTEM
U'PELIZES
Advanced Media Group
Page 92 of 142
creasing industry headaches such as
7 O M M FILM, A VERY LARGE
"comet-tailing" and blurring.
SCREEN, A H EXTREMELY
The 35mm filrn format has also been
FAST F I L M SPEED AT 60
the industry standard for decades.
Numerous industry leaders are quick to
FRAMES PER SECOFJD, AND
point out its obvious obsolescence. The
DIGITAL SOUND.
70mm filrn size, they note, offers much
more than a 100-percent improvement
in cinematographic possibilities. "Most
people, including large film manufacturers, do not really understand how much
dustry include film speed, expressed in
detailed information can be put on 70mm
frames-per-second (fps) and film format
film," asserts Optical Radiation's Berg(frame size, coupled with larger
gren, "and shown back on the screen."
screens). A third topic is the increasing
A central point. in an overall sense,
impact of high-grade video and its eventhat brings these debates into focus is that
tual manifestation - high-definition television (HDTV) - and how the two industhere is an already-existing arsenal of
tries will affect each other.
nevlt cinema systems. Each camp points
inarguably to the future, and each system
For decades, the standard film speed
is now offering spectacular new cinemain the theater industry has been 24 fps. At
this srxed. a relativelv low ~roiection- tic exrxriences.
light ievel' must be iaintainkd iten-16
s o h e of the new formats first debuted
in what the industry calls "specialfoot-candles) to prevent an annoying
sensation called "flicker." There are now
venue" theaters - noncommercial, museum, and other educational halls. Curseveral proponents who are urging that
film speeds be raised, so that higher light
rently the granddaddy of these is the
levels may be possible. Faster fps rates,
IMAX@/OMNIMAX@ system, now
they point out. also make for richer imamazing audiences at Washington, D.C.'s
agery. better color, and heightened speSmithsonian, Boston's Mugar OMNI

II

26 ADVANCED
SKY May 1987
MEDIA GROUP

Page 26 of 76

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167
Theater at the Museum of Science,
Chicago's OMNIMAX Theater (located
in the Henry Crown Space Center at the
Museum of Science and Industry), the
h
OMNI Theater at the Fort W o ~ Museum of Science and History, and the Science Museum of Minnesota in St. Paul among others. Several of these "space"

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 149 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 93 of 142
format images are projected through a
fish-eye lens onto a 76-foot dome, which
washes the screen with an enormous picture. The screen is tilted toward the audience at a 30-degree angle, which creates
a stunning wraparound effect.
Showscan@ is another radically new
film system with breathtaking sensory
experiences. Developed by special-effects wizard Douglas Trumbull (Srar
Wars, Star Trek; director of Silent Running and Brainstorm) Showscan has
amazed audiences at Expos '85 and '86;
the Vancouver theater in Canada remained open after the fair, and 50,000
people saw the Showscan presentation in
January of this year. The corporation is
currently opening special-venue theaters
in Los Angeles and several other cities in
the U. S., Australia, and New Zealand.
Showscan utilizes 70mm film, a very
large screen. an extremely fast film
s g e d at 60 fbs, and digital sound. While
leaters were designed by the architecdeveloping the process, Tmmbull ran
~ r a lfirm of Hammel-Green and Abextensive tests at various film speeds,
rahamson of Minneapolis, which esti~atedthat 20 million people attended
utilizing participants at California universities. For several years in the 1970s,
IMNIMAX theaters around the world in
Tmmbull was also head of Future Gen985.
The heart of the IMAX system is a
eral, an experimental department at
nique projection approach; the largeParamount Studios.

ENTERED23,
AND
FILED
Monday, November
2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November
5, 2015
Atlanta's independentLANCASTER,
filmmaker,
PA
VanDerKloot Film
and
Television,
***Electronically Filed***
extensively utilizes computers and
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
high-grade video in current
Andrew Gamber
production work.

Even though Showscan is currently


confined to special-venue theaters, the
corporation clearly has plans to move
into the box-office market. "We don't
have an announcement yet, but we're
very close," says marketing director
Cindy Porter. "We're confident that
when an announcement is made, a feaCI-15-10167
ture film will be out within
two years."
Currently, the leader in the race to
bring stunning new technology into the
first-mn film market is FuturVision
3*,
a division of FuturCinema Inc. in
New York. The brainchild of former
Kodak executive Eric Knutsen, this process utilizes large-screen (wall-to-wall,
floor-to-ceiling) 70mm, a sophisticated
digital audio system, and runs at 30 fps.
For several months, Knutsen and
FuturVision have had ties with Loews, a

HOW TO PURCHASE ONE OF EUROPE'S


A thousand years of myth and history await you with$ a day's drive
from Stuttgart-in any one of the
most technologically advanced
automobiles ever to come from
Mercedes-Benz. Choose from
among fourteen models.* And
embark on the driving odyssey of
your life. Traveling the Continent
at your leisure, saving money en
route-on trains, taxis, and rental
car costs. See your authorized
dealer. Then see the sights of
Europe-and bring one of them
home. Send coupon at right for
our free color brochure.
'subject to availability

'

Send coupon to:


Mercedes-Benzof
~ o r t ~merica.
h
~nc.,
Marketing Communications
I Division,
lne Mercedes Drive,

II
I

Name
A d k
city
Zip
8 1987 Mercedes-Benz of N A , Inc.. Montvale. NJ
DSMY 87

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 27 of 76

05.03.2007
SKY
May 1987 27

ENTERED
AND FILED
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Page 150 of 198
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS
OFFICE
a
BIG
SELLING
PQIHT
TO
FIRST-RUN
THEATERS
IS
Advanced Media Group
Page 94 of 142
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
&OMPARATIWE EASE OF COMPATIBILITY AND
***Electronically
Filed***
COST-EFFECPIVEPBESS.
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Architectural
Antique Auction
Saturday & Sunday
Starts 10:00a.m.

CI-15-10167

The lW@
system is a unique projection
approach where large format images are
projected t h ~ aafish*
kns 0a 76-foot dome.

Rare Uk Size Grecian Bronze

Over 1200 Unique I t e m s


will be sold

Several of the best handcarved


panelled roomspailable
Bronzewalls & formal enbyways
Carved wood embellishments
Chandeliers
Magnificent mantels
Saloon & home back bars
Marble statuary

As Always No Minimum No R e s e n e

ComplimentaryM e t and Drinks


For lrnrnedlate 1nformatIon

or Brochure
(Reader Survey Cards Delay Process)
call or write

5070 Peachtree Industrial Blvd.


Atlanta, aA 30341

(404)457-1905

MEDIA GROUP
28 ADVANCED
SKY May 1987

major theater chain (his system is now


being showcased at Loews Tower East,
a prestigious Manhattan screening
room). At presstime, Knutsen was preparing to announce an agreement with a
second major chain.
Besides its audiolvisual sorcery, one
of FuturVision's big selling points to
first-run theaters is comparative ease of
compatibility and cost-effectiveness.
Working with Optical Radiation Corp.,
Knutsen has developed his system so that
it can be integrated into existing theater
hardware - and still offer the dazzling
filmic experiences that all aggressive
chains are now scrutinizing.
One aspect of FuturVision is digital
audio, said to be comparable to CD q ality (actual CDImovie presentations
+stillin the future). With this
daudio is taken from the
film and fed to a Knutsendesigned processor, which then sends audio signals to
an upgraded house system.
"Now," Knutsen says, "the projectionist can walk into the booth and
flip two switches. One automatically
changes screen brightness from low level
to a much higher level for our film, and
at the same time changes film speed from
24 to 30. The second switch automati-

Page 28 of 76

I'

cally bypasses house audio and goes to


our processing equipment. So, there's
virtually no set-up time."
until recently, the film-production
community and the exhibitorltheater
equipment industries have viewed each
other as barely tolerable neighbors,
forced to get along, but with little meaningful dialogue between the two camps.
Now, though, in the face of this starburst
of new technology, the two industries are
working together, insiders point out, to
achieve the common goal of a truly
realistic cinematic experience, and the
subsequent fiscal rewards.
Bill VanDerKloot, owner of VanDerKloot Film and Television in Atlanta,
one of the premier independent filmmakers in the south, has a keen eye on these
and other developments. His firm extensively utilizes computers and high-grade
video in current production work.
"Today," he points out, "stereo soundtracks are mandatory, even for lowbudget films, not the case just ten years
ago. People have become very sophisticated in their technical tastes for film.
"I am just incredibly excited about
what the future has to offer," VanDerKloot concludes. "The more like reality
we can make the dreams that we create
on film, the more fascinating and fantastic films will be."
Contributing editor Jim Pettigrew Jr.
is based in Atlanta, Georgia.Q

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 151 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 95 of 142

Management Group, LTD


w

m w m p w

Oregon Pike

Lancaster, PA 17601

717-569-5555

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Table O f Contents

CI-15-10167

Section I

~inancialManagement

Section I1

The Project

Section I11

Distribution and Structure

Group

Section IV

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 29 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 152 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 96 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Power Station w a s formed in 1977, in partnership w i t h Tony Bongiovi and


Bob W a l t e r s . Pcrwer Station, within a short period of time established
i t s e l f as the premiere reconhg f a c i l i t y i n the world. The studios
success t o a larye degree is due to Bongiovils tmmerdous creative talents
in the fields of studio design, prduction and en.-t
The a b i l i t y
t o anticipate what the public a t larye wants to hear and to create a
a highly marketable product.
format that will p&ce
CI-15-10167
Bongiwils creative genius became most evident with his recent success
producing t h e band *IBonJoviu, A f 3 x years of work dweloping t h e i r
t a l e n t and structuring the format f o r their music, ItE3on Jwit*rapidly
became one of top bands in the world.

-\
\.-

Bongiwils most recent project is a bard called I1French LiW, which he


brought into the studio approximately two years ago. You may have heard
French Lick's music in Ron Hawardls p-ction
of Gung-Ho. French Lick's
music and t a l e n t have been developed alo~lgthe s a m e format as "Ban Joviu
and have recmtly been s
h
e to the major r
e
c
o
m labels.
Contracts should be finalized w i t h QuantumMedium in a few weeks.
Quantum M e d i u m is a division of MCA, owned by the same people t h a t own
EWV. Fren& Lick is wholly owned by Power Station, along with t h e i r f i r s t
album, which gives Bongiwi t h e a b i l i t y to use any and all the songs from
the album in the mwie.
By placing the bard in t h e movie and having the music score written by the
band, w e are able t o take advantage of marbting potential mnnally not
available ta other prductions. The music video f o r the band w i l l be shot
a t thedtime as the mavie an3 w i l l primarily be scenes from the
movie. 'Ihe release of the video w i l l be +.inwl to pramate the opening of
the movie. ?he release of the songs off the first album w i l l also be
coordinated to pramate the mwie. W fully urdershnd t h e marketing
potential the band brings to the project, picture what gross receipts a t
the box office would look like i f I*BonJoviI1 were appearing in a movie
this year (Any movie) If F'rench Lick does one tenth as w e l l as Bon Jwi,
this mwie is a -teed
hit.

During Bongiwi ' s work on " S t a r W a r s 1 * , **ApocalypseNaw" and llGung-holl, he


w a s able t o rclake many of the contacts necessary to form t h e extremely
talented group of artists that are essential f o r a production t o be
successful.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 30 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 153 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 97 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

peters: ~irector/Writer/Prducer
has directed many programs such as t W a t t Houston", "Falcon
C r e s t t t, tfGigneyand L
a
w
, tWisfitsw, ~tBerrengersn,and tlRemington
t h a t convinced Tony t o
SteeleN t o name a few. The film Ehrbara dire&&
hire her for this pxduction w a s tWunmoids Frow The Deeptt. Humanoids was
made i n 1978 for $ 980,000 ($ 20,000 d e r budget and four days ahead
of
CI-15-10167
and foreign theatrical
schedule) and grossed aver $28 million in d-ic
Sales. Tixis w a s during a period in time when the video market w a s in its
early stages of d e v e l w t . A film released today t h a t would gross $ 28
million in 1978 dollars has even greater potential for a much higher gross
with the strong video market that is available naw. What impressed Tony
the
w i t h Baxbaratsdjrection of Humnoids w a s her a b i l i t y to bring a
high degree of quality to a film on such a l i m i t e d W g e t .
Peter Hock: Stunt ~ ~ t o r / A c t o r / s & m h m
Peter8s d t s include films such as, Trading Placestt, gtStepford
Bustersw, "FX', and a host of other Films,
Wives", 'To K i l l A Capw, "Ql&

Broadway, - i d s

p,
L

ard Telwision S h c m .

There are many factors which contribute to a projects success. I f you


w e r e t o take a m c s section of the movie h3ustry t o find which types of
projects w e r e most likely to s u m , yau wauld find that movies in the
two t o four million dollar range have much greater chances of success than
movies in the t a t o f i f t e e n million dollar range. The reasons f o r t h i s
are qui,. simple. A movie in the two t o four million dollar range is a
high enough budget to pmduce a quality film h x t limiting the r i s k t o the
investor since it needs less of the market share to p&ce
a profit.

Horror mwies, frran the investors point of view are the safest type of
movie to finance. H o r r o r mies have an almsst cultist fo1lmi.q.
The
type of audience that attenl homr mies rarely w a i t to see what the
critics have t o say about the movie. mere is a fascination w i t h gore
t h a t this audience would rather see than have described t o them. The
overseas market f o r movies of this genre are tremendous. In almost a l l
cases the gross revenues fram the theatre, w i l l be greater overseas than
in the damestic (US and Canada) market. ?his especially holds t r u e f o r
horror movies.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 31 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 154 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 98 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

O v e r the last few years, w e have h e n seeing a trend for movies t o have a
much heavier music score than in the past. The feelings that can be
invoked in an audience from audio are sometimes as great o r greater than
the visual aspects of a film. W i t h Bongiovi's experience and past track
record, w e are assured of having one of the best quality sound tracks t o a
h e movie
movie ever M e . 'Ibis production could very well revolutionize tCI-15-10167
inctustry i n t h a t this will be the first time that the sound track w i l l be
t o t a l l y digitized fram the set to the theatre o r home video. What this
means is that t h e quality of the sound, which is typically extremely poor
in a m v i e theatre o r hone video cassette, w i l l now be tremendously
crisp. T h i s new m i e sourd will be similar t o the quality you would
aqect froan a laser disc. Normally the costs involved t o produce a m i e
wit31 this type of s a n d track would greatly increase the budget to a point
where the project would have an increased element of risk. With Power
Station, w h i c h W d y has in place state of the art equipnmt, some of
w h i c h can be found in only one o r two other studios in the world, this
sourrd track can be produced f o r a fraction of the costs that another
produckion ccanpany would have to pay. l h i s greatly reduces the r i s k t o
the investor to be able t o prcduce state of the art audio at a fraction of
the costs.

It is a very natural progression f o r a recording studio such as mer


Station to evolve into an e n t e r b b m m t cmplex w h i c h includes the
production of films. Pcrwer Station currently has financing in place f o r a
$ 3.5 million video mix studio t o be fsuilt next t o the recon3i.q studio.
D i s - t r i l p t i o n companies are constantly looking for new sources of product
to market. With Bongiovils track record in the entertairrment industry,
any p&ct
that mies t h e Bongiovi label should create a bidding
silxntion w i t h t h e distributors.
Advanced plblic relations w o r k is currently being done t o set the s t a g e
for negotiations with t h e distribution campanies. l l B i l l h a r d l t , 'VarieWt1,
and "Box Officetqhave W d y agreed t o do a r t i c l e s on Bongiovi and t h e
nmvie. On April 30, ABC w i l l be airing a radio talk show w i t h Boriyiari
that w i l l air on 2300 stations to a total listening audience of over six
million people. "Fame, Fortune, and Romance" have also agreed t o give
network T V coverage.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 32 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 155 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 99 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

The home video market has rapidly been changing the potential mwie
profits for the industry. A Nighbare On Elm Street w a s made for w e l l
under two million dollars and has earned New Line Cinema more than $24
million a t the domestic box office. I n addition, a f t e r a short video
release, this production has sold over 3 million cassettes. In the past
videos w e r e sold only t o video'rental stores for approximately $70
CI-15-10167
apiece. Recently the price has been lmered t o expand the market t o the
general public. The video rental stores won't disappear, but they may
became more like record stores that also rent their albums. A l l of this
translates into more profit potential for prcducer and investor.
It is an extremely rare opportunity t o be able to get in on the ground
floor in an offshoot of an already well established entertainment
company. Any investor willing to back this project w i l l have f i r s t right
of refusal on any future projects. ?he pe.rcentages w i l l remain the same
for a t least the first two projects.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 33 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 156 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 100 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Independently prduced motion pictures are a better investment today

than ever before.

1) Increased Markets: There is much wider distribution of motion


pictures today than ever before (i.e. Pay Tv, Cable TV,

CI-15-10167

videoassettes, satellite tmnsmissions, etc. )


'Presale' contracts which bind the buyers (i.e. networks, pay Tv,
foreign distributors, etc.) t o specific payments a t a future date,
this insuring return of capital and, in sane cases, a p r o f i t before
t h e film is released.
2.

Investment structure:
The producer and investor form a limited partnership for the purposes

of prottucing one or more motion pictures. The investor receives 100%


of the net p r o f i t s until remupent, after w h i c h the s p l i t is 50-50.
Profit participation of o ~ e s s(actors, director, writer, etc. ) canes
out of t h e p&cerls
end.

The pq3uce.r secures t h e services of a director, principal actors,

and a w r i t e r .
Presale Deals:
The producer can negotiate presale (preproduction) arrangements with
distributors, networks, pay TV, merchandisers, etc. Whereas such
ar~angementscan minimize the downside risk, they can also inhibit

the eventual profitability of the film.


Risk Factors:

It is very difficult to determine exactly how much of a r i s k one runs


in financing a theatrical film. Adequate s t a t i s t i c s are hpssible
t o find. Shannat Services of Los Angeles a four-year-old study w h i c h
revealed that 60% of all f
b released make money. This study,
however, did not include long range TV syndication (foreign and

domestic) revenues, and w a s made before Pay TV and video cassettes


Chemical Bank of New York
reports that they have never lost mney on film financing.

became significant additional markets.


r

' \.

-.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 34 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 157 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 101 of 142

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Another r i s k is the possibility that no distributor w i l l want t o


release the picture. That is why some independent producers include
a provision for distribution financing in their investment
agreemmts. I f worse comes t o worst, producers can distribute t h e
film themselves. (Notable examples are ''Billy Jacktt and ttBenjit'.)
There may be production catastrophes that w i l l delay o r cancel
Producers w i l l carry various forms
pmduction o n e it is under
CI-15-10167

of insuranoe (including completion bonds) t o a t least repay whatever


funds have already been spent.

If a distribution amaqement has not already been made, the producer

now secures such an arrangement. I f the picture is goad, it is


possible to negotiate a much better deal than could have been done
earlier. On the other hand, the producer could have truuble securing
the kind of distribution commitment wanted. The main factors here
are hcw much money the distributor is willing to c o m m i t to s e l l i n g
the picture, h m much influence the producer can have on the
m r l e t i q ~ m p a i g n ,and the distribution fee. Sanetimes smll
distributors are able t o give more time and attention t o indeperdent
pictures and offer better terms, but the producer may have to provi.de
same - W o n
expexes.
of gmss domestic box office receipts, the exhibitor (retailer)
usually subtracts his fixed costs and then receives 10%. Cut of t h e
ranainjng 90% gmss film rentals received by the distributor
(wholesaler), he usually recoups all or part of his costs plus a
distribution fee of 20-35%, then passes the rest on t o the
producer/hwestor. Terms of distribution deals vary considerably.

Cut

Ebx office reoeipts, however, only account for a part of the


producer/investorls revenues. A s the enclosed figures show, t h e
ancillary markets are a t least as significant as the daoestic theatre
box office. T V syndication, for instance, can continue t o bring in
revenues f o r the next twenty years.
Demand for P r d ~ c t :

TWayts supply comes nowhere near to mtching real demand. A t the


present time, there are over 18,000 theatres i n the United S t a t e s .
It can readily be seen t h a t roughly 400 films produced and rated l a s t
year did not w i n t o m e e t t h e i r needs. Theatres are canpelled t o
show any type of film they can obtain to keep t h e i r doors open.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 35 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 158 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 102 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

To date, independent producers are responsible for 72% of a l l films


mde world-wide. The domestic figure is 62%. The independent

producer has three primary options -r

distribution. These
include the sale of the film outright to a major national
distributor, t h e i r merchandising of the film by the production
who
company i t s e l f , o r the use of smaller regional sub-distsibuto~~
m y promote the film in their respective geographical areas.
Distribution of films often relies on a l l three methods t o one degree
CI-15-10167
or another.
Another market, television, can consume nearly every film that has
been, o r is presently being produced. If each of the three networks
would show only one film per night, they would need over 1,000 f i l m s
per year. In ks Angeles area alone, there are nearly 10,000 f i l n ~ ~
aired each year in a ambination of local and network viewing time.
Many f i l m s are shown time and time again because there are no new
fibs to replace them.
Today, virtually every film of quality has residual value in
television, either by outright sale o r by t e n n licensing. Tke latter
is preferable since it a l l = the production company to retain
' p of the negative. The t i m e lag between theatre release and
~hasdimini~edfromsev~yearstoanaverageof18mnths.
Hwever, scnne major features such as ffTheWizft have been sold to TV
before completing a full year in theatrical release. The trend seems
to be toward prchase of 'freshf films, and the outlets appear
willing to pay the higher costs involved
I

Because of the great demand and the outrageously ccanpetitive a t t i t u d e


that pemades the networks, handsame deals are being consummated
before the production has been q l e t e d and then, by p-ement
w i t h the producers, hold the film u n t i l it has completed its

theatrical run.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 36 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 159 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 103 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 37 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 160 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 104 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Breakeven for Limited Parhers:

CI-15-10167

Based on gross revenues of $ 11,200,000 collected fm 1st and 2nd


theatrical runs
1st run ticket costs of $ 6.00
2nd run ticket

costs of $

5.00

1st Run
50 people per shed

x $ 6.00

$ 300.00 G r o s s per show

$ 300.00 per shaw X 1000 houses

$ 300,000 G r o s s

$ 300,000 X 14 days

$ 4,200,000 G r o s s

$ 250.00 G r o s s per show

$ 250.00 per shod X 2000 houses

$ 500,000 G r o s s

$ 500,000 X 14 days

$ 7,000,000 G r o s s

2nd Run

50 pea~leper show

X $ 5.00

TotalIstm
Total 2nd Run
Total

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 38 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 161 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 105 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Forcast A

Total Box Office G r o s s


Less 15%For Theatres

-----

--

Motion Picture P r o f i t s

Less 30% Distribution Fee

L e s s : Investors Capital
N e t Profit

-$

---------

----

Producers Split @ 50%

--

Invesbmt Company R e t u m
Less : General Partners Split @ 15%

Investors Return

11,200,000
1,680,000
CI-15-10167

9,520,000

2,856,000

6,664,000

4,000.000

2,664,000

1,332,000

1,332,000

199,800

1,132,200

T h e s e are only proiections and are for informational ~ u p o s e sonly. Any


investment made, based s o l e l y on these proiections would be unadvisable as
actual P e r f o m c e could varv m e a t l y .

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 39 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 162 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 106 of 142

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Forecast B
Forecast B is based on a total box office gross of $ 28 million
A film that produces a theatrical gmss of $ 28 million can be expect& to
gross at least that much from W ,Cable and video markets. Depending
on how
CI-15-10167
distribution agreements are negotiated we can expect 50% to be net profits.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 40 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 163 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 107 of 142

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

Forecast B

-----------

Total Box O f f i c e Gross


B s 15% For Theatres

$ 28,000,000
$CI-15-10167
4,200,000

--------I----

Motion Picture P r o f i t s ----TpCC 30%

$ 23,800,000

Distribution Fee

7,140,000

$ 16,660,000
T.V.,

Cable and V i d e o N e t --------

$ 14,000,000

Total N e t -------TpCC :

$ 25.340.000

Investors Capital

N e t Profit

----------

4,000,000

$ 21,340,000

m c e x s S p l i t @ 50%

$ lo., 670,000

Invesbent Companiest Return

$ 10,670,000

L e s s :,General Partners S p l i t @ 15%

1,600,500

Investors Return

9,069,500

These are only proiections and are f o r informational txlnxses only. An


invesmt made, based solely on these ~ m i e c t i o n swould be unadvisable as
actual p e r f o m c e could v a r ~sreatly.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 41 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 164 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 108 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday,AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

You Oughta Be In
Pictures!
1
I
by Alan Talansky

here's esplosive growth occurring in the motion picture industry, and growth should always be
music to any investor's ears. "But
movies?" YOU say? It's time to put
aside your images of Tinschonrn and
"Heaven's Gate," and to take another
look at an industry with some new,
sound investment potential.
There's risk in any investment, of
course, even in real estate - the investment area on which many firms
originally buiit their reputation and
success. In real estate, it's a matter of
how carefully you assess a variery of
influential factors and how you structure the deal. Motion pictures are
much the same. You've got to look

'

;
j

:I I

fashioned profit: an ideal solution for


post tax-reform era.
The key here is understsnding how
nluch the industry has chsnged. The
tyranny and fickleness of box-office
receipts is no longer. More people
around the world are viewing more
films than ever before, but not necessarily in the theatres. Consider, for
example, that there are only about 300
feature films made every year, of
which about half could be considered
-major.- NOW, compare that with the
number of movies a cable outlet, like
Home Box Office,
shows in a single
day. Eight? Then,
take a look at the
shelves of ytwr l t x ~ l

3.

ucts to be financed, and the second is


the structuring of the deal.
1, selecting the product, success is
usually found in
~ 1 ,
larger the budget
in
a
film,
the
grcatcr
CI-15-10167
the fink.
the $50 ,-,,illion
pdted blockbusters and seek out. instead, the more modest undenakings
smaller, ambitious film production sources. A,, excellent exan,ple
is
Island Picture-, a relatively
independent film production and distribution company for which, last

Not quite a blockbustec lslund's "Nobodv's Fool. " s t a r r i t ~ ~


Karannu Arquellr und Eric Roberts, wus a more morlrrute success.
e m with Pulitzer Prize winrringpIrrywnght tkfh Henley wri~ing.Photo
courtesy I S MPictures.

I
ll

:I
I

Success on a shoestring: Producer/director Spike Lee (center) turned


a paltry $ 175,000 procluctiun bltdget for "She's Gt~ttuHum It' itklo u
$7 milliotr grcw.itr(:suprise hit. Co-stun-jolrn Cutrurlu Terndl (left) cord
Redmotrl H i c k (n(:/rt, wiill i r e utz tire w t PMto courtesy Forty k e s
and a Mule Filmworks.

When the motion picture industry


was first examined as an investment
, vehicle a few years ago, the expecta1 tion was that there was potential for
tax deferment. What was found, however, was a surprisingly rich source of
income for investors from good, old-

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

video rental store,


and the crowds
looking them overt
and you begin to
understand the dimensions of growth.
Of course, just as not every piece of
real estate is a great investment, every
movie isn't bound t o turn a p-ofi;.
But, there are two factors that have
proven to be the critical difference in
creating a sound investment vehicle.
The first is the selection of the prod-

Page 42 of 76

year, a $7.4 million equity placement


was arranged. Island Pictures is an rfficient operation - unlike some of
the more notorious larger Hollywood
studios - a n d it knows how to
recognize quality.
Little known Island Pictures captured a great deal of attention in 1985
with two extraordinary films - "Kiss
of the Spider Woman" and "Trip to
Bountiful." It was the first time in history that o n e production house could
claim credit for both the Best Actor

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 165 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 109 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167
The information set forth herein w a s obtained fnan sources w h i c h w e
believe reliable, but w e do not guarantee its accuracy. N e i t h e r t h e
information nor any opinion apressed constitutes a solicitation by us of
the purchase o r sale of any securities or cammodities. 'Ibis package is
f o r informational purposes only, t o gain an indication of interest in t h i s
project. Financial Management Group Ltd. does not endorsed and has not
been contracted by Wer Station t o promote this project. Any questions
regardug information contained herein should be direckd t o Stanley J.
Caterbone o r Scott Robertson.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 43 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 166 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 110 of 142

ENTERED AND FILED


PROTHONOTARYS
OFFICE
Monday, November
23, 2015
LANCASTER,
PA
Thursday, November 5, 2015
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 44 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 167 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 111 of 142

I.

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

w
t
y Financing with LimitedD-

a.
b.

c.
d.

CI-15-10167
UnlimitedMmrberof Investors
Small units of $5,000 to $25,000 per unit
Share 50%of profits w i t h Limited Partners
Time constraints as follows:
1. 90 day for regulatory appto s o l i c i t securities
2.
30
60 days to raise 2 - 4 million

11.

Equity Financing w i t h General Partners

a.
b.

c.
d.
e.

Smallnumberof investors
No time constraints t o raise funds
Large u n i t s $1 to $4 million units
Share 50%of profits w i t h General Partners
Very difficult because of the poor economic reputation of film
b3ustry w i t h r q x d s to investors.

111. Debt Financing with General Partners

a.
b.

IV.

F're Sell Distr-ion

a.

v.

above
Costs are 50%interest per year: For every $1 million, it w i l l cost
a t least $500,000 in guaranteed interest payments.
Sam= as

Contracts

b.

W of m t i v e Control
Share 60% to 80% of profits w i t h Distribution Ccarpany

c.
d.

upside potential
L i t t l e damside risk

DebtwithLineof Credit
a.
b.

c.
d.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Need collateral redL estate, inventory or accounts receivables


Very cheap 8% - 11%
per year for i n t e r s t
N o t h constraints
No loss of creative control

Page 45 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 168 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 112 of 142

ANALYSIS

The follawing Analysis shows how the different forms of financing


conpare to one another under the most important variables to us:
1. Creative Control
2. Time parameters
3. Costs
I used three economic sceneries as to the net results of the CI-15-10167
project:

1. A
of 1 Million Dollars
2. A Profit of 15 Million Dollars
3. A Profit of 100 Million Dollars

Alternatives

Time

Creative
Corrtrol

Cost

Of
Financing

LDss Of

1.1 Equity

90-180
Days

Same

mss

50% of
Profits

No lhss

$7.5 M

$50 M.

with Limited

II*)Equity
with General

30-180

MOZ

$7.!34

$50 M

Loss

50% of
Profits

No bss

Days

111. ) Debt with

30-180

50%-100%
Interest

$3.0 M

$3.0 M

Days

S ~ T E
Less

No Lr>ss

Generals

$10.5M

$70 M

Profit
$1 Million of $15M

Profit Of
of $100M

m e s

N.) Pre Sell


Distribution

Days

V. ) Line of
Credit

mYs

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

30-180

- 30

60%-80%
NO LOSS
of Profits

None
Inst

8%-11%
Interest
Payments

Page 46 of 76

Refinance

$440,000
or
with 30 year less
note with
$9523/Mo.
payment @11%
Wlilding

$440,000
or
less

05.03.2007

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 169 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 113 of 142

CI-15-10167

1.

Story

2.

Treatment

35,000

3.

Director

50,000

4.

5.

ArleneandEhrbara, N.Y.

6.

Finance Costs

5,000

110,000
50,000
200.000
$ 450,000

Line of Credit

$ 250,000

Stan's Investor

250,000

The above gives us 60 days to receive funds froan Sony and Visa for the spot in
the beginning of the video.
n-Lis gives us a chance to get money without using the line of credit.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 47 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
IIAY
27,Andrew
1 i/:37 Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 170 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 114 of 142

THE MI-ITANT FRO.-IEC:T

__--____--_________-------------------------------------TOTALS

_-_---_-_-_--__-_---------------------------------------;
STORY
O
C:SINT I NU ITY AND TFi'EATMENT
F'ROKIUCEK
o
D 1RECTOR
3+
OAST
BITS
EXTRAS AND STAND-INS

II

5;0(:10.00:
3.1(75(:1(:](:I :
1 15054. 00 :
2250(2(11.
(I): :
38&,,212.
(10:
521.00:
122253. C)O :

I
I
I
I
1

I
I
I

I
I
I
I

t
I
I

CI-15-10167
I

I
I

----------------,-----------------------#---------------'
TOTAL ABOVE THE L I N E
a
8E8&.YCl.00 1
I

----------------------------------------a---------------;
I
I

I
I

PRODUCTION STAFF S A L A R I E S
PRCfDtlC:TI ON OPERAT I
NG STAFF
SET D E S I G N I N G
SET OPERATING EXPENSES
LOCAT I ON
TESTS AND RETAKES
CUTTING/FILM/LAEORATORY
MClS 1 C
SI~I-IND _
PLIEL I C I T Y
MISCELLANEOUS

INSURANCE/TAXES/LICENSE5; k FEES
GENERAL OVERHEAD

I
I
I

8
I

I
I
I

8I
I
I

I
I
1

1
I
I
I

8I
I

1
I
I
I

1Y255S. 00 :
58295&..001
Z051cS5.00:
26t5.858.C)O 1
543:395.00:
20750.OC) :
-3~-4244.
.-.
(:)(I
:
161409.00:
184359.00:
1

19121.00:
31 1381.00:
3580(1.C)(] :
I

1
I

-----------------------------------------;---------------t

TOTAL BELOW THE L I N E

2c5c,516.00 :

1
I

37472(1)&.00 :

1I

&*46750.00:

4393956.C)C)1

----------------------------------------;---------------t

----------------------------------------;---------------t

TOTAL ABOVE b FELQW THE L I N E

----------------------------------------;---------;=----:
----------------------------------------1---------------;

TOTAL F I N A N C E CHGS/CClNTINGENCY /BONDS


----------------------------------------;---------------t

GRAND TCfTCIL

........................................

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

--f-------

tlOES NOT INCLUDE c:2"'' f ::r>ENIY

Page 48 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
F'AGE 1

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 171 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 115 of 142

STORY:

I [lAYS/WEEt::S

RATE

TClTAL

'------------I---------------;-------------.

4.
P.
C:.

STiIIKY F'l-lRC:HASE
T I T L E PI-1HC:HASE
M1SCELLANEiII-1::; EXPENSE

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

aI

1 5<100.
00
: U

5(:)0<).()0

: O
I
I

-----------------------------------I------------l---------------;--------------

TlIlTAL STORY:

-----------------------------------'----'------------:---------------;-------------Cl3NT INU ITY AND TREATMENT:


A.

B.

EB.
C.

I?.
E.

50(:,C).
00

CI-15-10167

aI

WR ITERS
SECRETARIES AND T Y P I S T S
PAYROLL TAXES - B (15.8%)
XEROX EXPENSE
RESEARCIH EXPENSE
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE

30000.00

: 3000O.O~)
: O
: O
: 3000.00
: 1650.00

8
I

1
I

a1

8I

1 .IS

I
I

aI

8I

8I

I
I

I
I

I
I

1
I

200.00

----------------------------'------------;---------------a-------------.

TOTAL C O N T I N U I T Y AND TREATMENT:


?

-----------------------------------'------------;---------------;------------PHODIJCER :
I
a
I
I

&7em~G
A.

B.
BE.
C.
C:C.
D.

S ROEINSON/S

I
I

aI

I
I

I
I

I
I

ta
I
I

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

I
I

aI

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

ASSOCIATES (ARLENE)
BARBARA PEETEKS (DEFERRED)
SECRETARIES
PAYROLL TAXES - C: ( 1 5 . 8 % )
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE

100000.00

o
I

26

aI

I
I

3465(1).(](I

500.00

0
0
10~l000.00
0
13000.00
2054.00
0

-----------------------------------~------------~---------------~-------------.

TOTAL PRC1DUC:ER :

115c)54.00

-----------------------------------;------------;---------------t-------------

D I REC:TilR:

11
IRECTOR
B. SECRETARIES
EB. PAYROLL TAX - P ( 15.8%)
C.
HEALTH b WELFARE/PENSION
D. MISCELLANEOCIS EXPENSE

A.

12.5%

I
I

8I

8
1

200000. 00

-1I

20006C). 00

:
:
:

I
I

1
a

I
I

I
I

I
I

: 5
: 34
: 15

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

:
:
:

0
25(]0(].()(]
i)

-----------------------------------;------------1---------------;-------------

TOTAL D IRECTIIIR

225~1(:1(:).0(:)

-----------------------------------'------------;---------------1-------------

cAST :
C:OL HEMSLEY ( P / D Y
RICK (P/DY)
.-IERKY ( P / t l Y )
VTC (rn./r~
5 T h N ( F/ tfY)

~)

t::ATIE ( P / D Y )
GARREN ( F ' / D Y )
--IRCt:' ( P / D Y )
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

:
:

.-, ,
A%s

zk,
11
7
5

:. -

Page 49 of 76

10c)0.(1(:)
1000.00
1000.00
I (1)0 (1) (3(11
~C)Q(:I.~I~
1(1)(1)<I (1)(11
523.00
1 525. (:I(:)
.

---

-.-.

:
:
:
:
:

5000.
34(:)c)(].00
15000. (30
2:30(:)0.(:I(:!

2k.0i10.i~c)
1100(1) (1)(1)
3675. 0~:)
2(;25.(:)(1)

.-.,-.

05.03.2007

?.F

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 172 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 116 of 142
MATTHEW AP'A MR X ( F ' / D Y )
5 T H BOND MEMBER ( P / D Y )
LII~II:: t::LEIN ( F / t l Y )
BARNEY ( P / D Y )
.-IE:I-;;SIE ( P / D Y )
r::ORRI E ( P/DY
ELID ( P / D Y )
1::HARLIE ( P / D Y 1
ANNIE ( F / D Y )
I:rl'i L!-lN!:iRIN ( F ' / D Y )
lz*;4t.l (P/L!Y)
!:.Ers!+!'<<f:8i[!y;
I:.; lt.~I:~l: r.., i ( ,ras-tx TI.,-\r-I 1' \
,-!v,,,l::El:; i
.-.- i i .*,:.-1;.
:-Ir: '..' ,.
~.:;I>LLE[.~
(:(.{&*:.,'rEFi
- - .plat.; ( t : - l i CI r\ r-iA\,' )
J.

- . . , - . - I :

kAJ/

,.-.,-,-8--l,

EL!'{

.-- .,
,-,L

z.;%;l-k:!~:;;:=;c !:.;-F,;

p!9 . ' .
':;:C:>!'yt:'".'

r.-..

llti

[,!;q.f

"

(FfjJ< Llf;y')
.,' p-lr.; (i:.Er.*
,-, i-!{-,.,'

LI, 3 -a
.

;)E;
.

',/ .

L..'l..-c
..LI

( pk-!.L

\n :. \

CI-15-10167

:!

i.!{:,',':

;; L.12

"2

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

7
A

;;;i\.;:;
:f;'?'AFF WC!MAf;!

,:
:I#

':' ?

.
.. .:.. ,-"
\

;-'Z:f:
L

'""
L.*.,i? :

i:A\,' ',

.. ,-." ,I-.... .,- (. !.,L::,L!t.%,%!


.:.,-<l-,.t,
j
Li;.,<; ;-: 1r,i i-,
1 ,L 2: ;:..;I.,.-. . >:&!''\ j
...-? ( FEE c!A'y )
.i
\.
!1: 1.;
&
. , ... id:;=* ::- ( p k.l< LlG .i
ELE?,(zHc[l BF; 1x:!; 1 ; C:*FIf;: LI;?~','
ELEACHEtr E R A 1: r.]:
2 ( PElI; C-IA';' )
BLEF;IZHEU SK;iIN:S 3 ( P E R trAY)
FLERC:HED F R 6 I N S L! (PEK tlHY )
Cl:fA!sT
Gl-lARD (PER DAY )
F R I L L Y G I R L (PER DAY)
MRS. QUEEN ( PER ! DAY 1
HANDSOME TEENAGER ( F'ER EIAY )
G I A N T ULTRIMA GUARD ( PER DAY
CRlJDE BOY'S ISATE ( PER DAY )
CORPSE OFFICER 1 ( PER DAY
BARRICADE C:OP 1 (PER D A Y )
MUTANT S I T E CIIP ( PER DAY )
t::ERR '5 S 1DEK 1C:F:: C:IIIF' ( PER DAY )
:

tk:-

.-

P..

&..

-.

?,

,-'

' :%

HEALTH k WELFfiRE (11%)


FAYROLL TAXES (15.8%)
OVERTIME CAST ( 5 % )
STI-lNTS :
Bl3QT DRIVER
11
IVER
CHARLIE I N TANK
G I R L PULLED FR R I D E
BOY PULLED F R H I D E
CREEP PULLED FR R I D E
C H A R L I E & BARNEY F I G H T
STAN FEATS COL H
HEALTH & WELFARE/F'ENSI ON
PAYROLL TAXES ( 15.8%)
l l T STLINTMEN ( 5 %1
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

1 1% )

Page 50 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 173 of 198


Advanced
Media
C:IIIAC:H I NG
( VGroup
O I C:E/STUNT IZOCIRD/ETI: ) Page
:
:11720of 142
I
HEALTH h WELFARE ( 1 1 % )
FAYROLL TAXES ( 15. %
:
)
!:IT
STI-INT COr3R ( 5%
,
i1:AST 1N G D I RErI:T!]R
4
IZAsT I NG SIJPPL I E:; ( 5%)
,
MISCELLANEOUS

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
5, 2015
4 <I (11 (1) (1) Thursday, November
: E:-:C)(:)O.i)c]
LANCASTER,
PA
:
::::3(1) (:)(I)
***Electronically Filed***
: 1264.
Oi)
Nov 20 2015
06:18AM
1
4
4
4
(
1
1
Andrew Gamber (1)
: C.0(:)0 (:I(:)
1 5 (1)(:) .(1)(1)
: :300, 00
: (1)
: 0

4I

I
t

I8

.
.

,--------------(-------------.

TOTAL CAST
-------------------------------'------------'---------------i-------------

FITS:
KCINN ING TEENAGER ( P/ISY
DANCING G I R L ( P / D Y
F R I L L Y MClM

HEALTH ?A WELFARE/PENSION
PAYROLL TAXES (15.8%)
OVERT IME
F I T T I N G CHARGES

:
:
:

1
I
1

:
:
:

I
I

I
I

I
1

I
I

8
1

I
1

I
I

TOTAL B I T S :

I
I

EXTRAS:
SEE PRELIMINARY BOARD

150.00
150.00
150.00

-----------------------------------;------------;---------------;-------------

1
t

1400

1400
700

81

1
I

I
1

tI

1400

18375.00
4539.00
0
1 11271.89
: 1334.59

:
:

:
:

77.00

: 15520.00

8I

aI

I8

4.00

1 2452.16
0
: 5600. 00

1400

(1)

70(:)0.00
0

160

45000.00

5;. 00

I
I

13.13
6.57

STAND-INS ( 4 X 46 DAYS)
PAYROLL TAXES ( 15.8%)
HRW STAND- I N S (NUN UNION
FClX LUNCHES - EXTRAS

:
:

I 0

EXTRA ADJUSTMENTS ( D R I V E T O ) .

35. 00

I
I

OVERTIME ( 2 HRS)
OVERT1ME ( 1 ADD HR 1
F I T T I N G FEE
PAYROLL TAXES ( 15.8%
SERVICE FEE ( 10%)

: 150. 00
: 150.00
: 150.00
: O
CI-15-10167
: 0
: 71.
: 0
: 0
: 0
: 0
i 521.10

-----------------------------------'------------;---------------;------------I

380211.7(:)

4I

1t

122252.64

-----------,-----------------------I------------l---------------_:-------------

TOTAL EXTRAS AND STAND-INS

-----------------------------------I------------~---------------~------------I
I
I

I
I

-----------------------------------:------------;---------------o-------------

: :28:368'3. 44
-_----_---_--__-___-----------------------------------------------------

GRAND TOTAL ABOVE THE L I N E

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

4I

Page 51 of 76

I8

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 174 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 118 of 142

. ..

1,-

. < ,. , .

.'\.::,

t'.F,,:.!i

1 ~ .

. ,

.,

-.,-

:'_

I_

.,:

tE.
F.
G.

.-I.

K.
L.
M.
N.
N.

,'

;; ;!

. .

I'
ErD.

.,

il.

,,,

;:,-;-,;

. a ,

.. .

\ :

.:

,..$1.:

-8..

, '-%I.;
, ,.+:!:k 8
i:.'
:[-.:LI;> .. . j

'

,.,I1

.I...L

/;.:,.:

:
I

:
I

I
I
I
1

1
I
I

. ..

,:s,

..

:A

ZND 2 N T ! At1 ( P E R WEEK)


TrNrl Art PRODI-IC:I ON F E E ( P E R WEEK )
Ll11C:fiTI CIN MANAGER ( P E R WEEK )
!:;CR IF'T :i;IIF'EKV I:;OR
( P E R [IAY )
F'RODI-IC:T I ON C:I-\IIIRD I NATOR ( P R ClAY
TEC:HN I C A L AIIV I SOH ( PER D A Y
NI-IRSE ( P E R D A Y )
LI:IC:AT I ON AI-Itl ITOR ( P E R WEEK)
WELFARE/TEAC:HER ( P E R D A Y )
N I G H T PREMIUM ( 5 DAYS)-50%
IIIVERTIME ( 5 % )

.:

;::;.;;c:;-!;y

;-

, .

.
0

.,.,:..:. i
j.'F
;;;l;,:;-!;,-!-;!~:.
_,I I.
<i.:s;..:~.,;
b!~ii:,.j
1~ ; !.-:>; ;:L:FI
I
I- (!:*Fcr< i&Et.: )
.; Ll 1 \?:!:TI:I&'
I
( (PER WEEK )
I

.. ,

. .:
.' ;.- 1.

. ..

.,,,.

. .

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
-. .I ;
:-, r
Andrew Gamber
.

.
I!
.

.'??;;'

:
I

. .

: .,!>

...

- .

~. ,

2 7 (1)(1) (2(1) :

11:
I=,
#-.

at

,=a

--*

.
.

*-+

(-):

297(:)C).
i:~!
4 1(1) (1)(1) :
:=:?::(I)
(1)(
18 (1) (11 (1)(1) I
1 :: (1)
(1)I
17I:( (1) (3[:I I
13/-.
(:I(;)
01
329.00 :
2 r 5 ~ : 2(1):.
1000. (30 :
14Oc:)O. (111
235.00 :
li)l(:15.(111
1-30. ( ~ 3:
(1)I
CI-15-1016712:1 59(:)
300.00:
o (1)(1) (1)!
175. (30 :
175(1). (111
13(:)0. 00 :
156()(:, (111
200.00 :
4t70. (111
1175.00 1
537.51
t
1
* ? l k 8 y .4:

.
.

1(1) :

.=.

: : : 5 f 1 4. (-),

11: (1)(1) ;

16:
43:
A1I
10:
1(2 !
121

.
.

.-I

L I
t

.5:

4
I

I
1

I
I

I
I

1
I

I
1

tI

I
I

9:
51 :

5:
10:

3000.00 :
340.00 :
~ - 3 50(11
. :
235. O(7 :
220.00:
275.00 :
150. 00 :

I
I

aI

-----------------------------------:------------;---------------a--------------

T O T A L PRI:IDUI_~T I ON S T A F F :

1'32557.9

-----------------------------------;------------1---------------1--------------

PROKII-ICT I ON OPERAT I NG S T A F F :
A.
C:AMERAMEN
D I RECTOR O F PHOTOGRAPHY ( P/WK
CAMERA OPERATOR ( 5;
( P/DAY
KEY 1 S T ASSISTANT ( P / D A Y )
1ST ASSISTANT (P/DAY)
2ND ASSISTANT (P/DAY)
VTR PLAYBACK (?/DAY)
S T I L L P H I ~ T I I C ~ R A P H E R( P / 3 H D A Y )
E X T R A CAMERA OPERATORS
N I G H T PREMIUM ( 5 D A Y S ) - 5 0 %
O. T. CAMERA CREW ( 10%
M 1SC:ELLANEI]I-I!E;

1
8
I
I
I

I
I
q

51:
41:
41:

F ?

4 I
c

9(25(] (30 :

I
I

I
I

II

1
I

.
.

2 7 (1)0 (3 (1)
1 7 3 4 0 . (1)'
11935. (11
9r5,C:5.0
Q(320, i)
1275. (3
1%(:)(:I (1)
(1)
4 5 2 5 . (7
E: 24,E: .(11

-----------------------------------#------------*---------------*--------------

TCITAL CAMERA S T A F F

'9(I)y4::

-----------------------------------I------------~---------------l--------------

SfIlI-IND DEPARTMENT
MIXER (F'/tIAY)
RECIIIHDER
FCICIM PERSON ( P / D A Y
11:AELE P E R S O N ( P / D A Y
IZAELE FtIlOM PERSCIN
RAD 1111PERSCIN
N I G H T P K E M ILlM ( 5 D A Y S - 5 0 %
O.T.
SlIlI-IND C:REW (1(11%)
M 1:~;(~:ELLANEIIII-I:I-;

I
I

t
I

1
I

I
I

41:

275. 00 1

I
I

I
I

I
I
1

41:
41:

235. (I):

I
I

I
I

I
I

c
LU

8
1

3725.00

I
I

t
I

I
a

12:

STAFF

WAR~IROFE IIlEPARTMENT
WARDROBE LIES i GNER ( P/WK
L.!,c)F;rr~f~;GC7 I 2 1

.
.

(:

18k.2. 5
324(:1. 7

--356.4:::.I:

".'CK,

W[IlMEI\I.':3 CJ&Rfiti!ilr*E 1 S T ( P / K l A Y )

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

I
I
I

Page 52 of 76

,
I

51:

.(1

aI

1/ 5 0 0 . 0 0

(-1

'?6:35. (1)
(11

------------------;------s------

. :1

I
I

-----------------------------------'------------#-----

TIIITAL S1:fUNEl

9/. --.-,.-I
'3 c

.
.-

(-1

I
t

I
I

11275. (1;

-4

235.00:

.(11
.(1;

la32(:)(:).

'

235.

a(:,:

1 1.?:::.y

05.03.2007

(.

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 175 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 119 of 142

G.

SET DF;ES:-:ING DEF'AKTHENT


:SET [IEIZI:IK'ATIS~~ ( F'/ [IAY )
ASST SET [IEC:I:IRPTI:IR
( /='/DRY )
[lRES:::/RE[IRE:f;S/STF(
1K E
DRES::;/REDRESS/STR
J tc:E
[IRE:S:I;/RE[I~E!:;::;/STR
1K E
DRAPERY PERSON
r3REENSPERSl:lN
GREENSPERSON
N I G H T PREMILIM ( 5 D A Y S ) -50%
i t . T.
S E T DRESSING C:REW ( 10%)
M I SC:ELLANEl:lUS

51:
51:

8
I

I
I

1
I

I
I

I
I

,
t

a
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

.51

I
I

I
I
I

I
I

I
I

(:

.i

1137. .?
24:1:4. 1

CI-15-10167
26776.7

I
I

-----------------------------------:------------1---------------;--------------

H.

I
I
E L E C T R I C A L DEPARTMENT
I
1
43:
GAFFER ( P / D G Y 1
1
41:
BEST BOY ( P / D A Y )
I
I
41:
E L E C CIF'ERATINC; LABISR ( P/DAY
I
I
41:
E L E C OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y
I
I
I
I
E L E C OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y
1
I
41:
GENERATOR OPERATOR ( P / D A Y )
I
I
I
I
GENERATOR OPERATOR
I
I
I
I
ELECTRICAL RIGGING/STRIKING
I
a
I
I
E L E C T R I C A L R 11313IN G / S T R I k< I NCi
I
I
I
F A N OPERATOR
I
C I
I
.-I I
N IGHT F'REM I 1-IM ( 5 DAYS ) =50%
O.T.
E L E C T R I C DEPARTMENT (10%) :
I
I
I
M 1SCELLANEI~IJS
I
I
-----------------------------------'--------------;---------------:-------------.

235.00 :
222). 00 :
210.00:
210. 00 :

220.00

86.I(:).

I
I

.I

9c)2(:).(

.
.t
.
.

I
I

(.

I
I
I

5475.00

(.

27:::7. F
4810. :

I
I

10105. (1
5~(:)2(:) (1
161t:). (

.(1

TOTAL E L E C T R I C A L S T A F F

(:

(:

(:

.C
. (1
.
.r
.

I
I

2275.00

. (1

1 1 *.;/: 5
11220.

-----------------------------------I------------~---------------~--------------

TOTAL SET DRESSING S T A F F

4
I

.-, -,..-.c
.-, (1)(1) :
2 2(:1 (](:I :

I
I

1
I

4 L Y- 1 2 . ;

c-,

-----------------------------------1------------;---------------1-------------I
I. S P E C I A L E F F E C T S
I
I
S P F X C I X t R D I NATOR ( P / D A Y
SF' FX OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y )
:
:3P F X OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y
:
I
I
!Z;FECIAL F X OPERATING LABOR
I
D E S I G N ING $< DRAFT 1NlIi LABI3R
I
I
I
ElESIGNING .9< D R A F T I N G LABClR
C1:lNSTRUC:T 1GIN tf R I 1 2 cI N I ~LABOR
:
C:ONSTRUCTION fq R I G G I N G LABOR
:
I
t
N IGHT PREM Il l M ( 5 DAYS 1 - 5 0 %
111.T. SF'E1:IAL
FX ElEPAHTMENT 10% :
1
M 1SCELLANElIlIJS
I

10:
10:
10 :

305. (20 :

:
3(:)5.0cJ
:
3<15.c)0

1
I

I
I

..-I

100.
1525.

(
1

(:I

.'

I
I

(I(]
I

C1.Q:

3(:15(:).
..I.(-1

I
I

C I
1

(1)5 (1)

: :1

5:

.
.
5 (11.
.
.
5 (1) .

I
I

762.
1041.

-----------------------------------;------------;---------------;------------I
I

S E T STANDBY OPERATORS
I
I
I
CARPENTER ( F / D A Y )
I
CARPENTER ( P / D A Y )
I
I
I
EXTRA CARPENTER LABOR
I
N I G H T PREMIUM ( 5 D A Y S ) - 5 0 %
I
TI. T
SET z;TAwryrE!v ~ I F E R ~ ~ T I ~ 1(5%
IHS :
,
1 :! 11.EL L& Pi 1'11i-I .=,

I
I

1(11 :
1(:I:

250.00 :
.-, .-.
.>c (j
o:

TOTAL S P E C I A L F X S T A F F

-----------------------------------'------------:---------------;------------J.

.-.
-1.
1

..-I

E 8
I

100. 00 :
1250.09 1

I1

I
I

I
I

I
t

11453.

577.

-----------------------------------~------------*---------------*-------------

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 53 of 76

.
.
.
/-.'7.-' .

- (-1.-I(-1
c
L .--.-a (1
::: (1)(1)

.TC
a:.>.

05.03.2007

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
.
LANCASTER, PA
TIIITAL :SET S / F l3F'EKF;T I PIIIi :i;TAFF
/.352. .5(
***Electronically Filed***
----------------------------------- ------------ I__---_----_-_--(-_----Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
I
I .
:SET STANDBY F'A I NTER5;
I
I
Andrew
Gamber
.=,
- (1), (1) :
::.. s
:: (1)4 C) (1)(
P A I N T E R (F'/DAY)
I
I
(1)(
F'A I N T E R
.-I
i
1 0 (1) (1)(1) :
3 1 )(11 0 (
EXTRA F A I N T E R L A B I ~ R
I
.3
I
JL4.
(I)(
13. T . S E T STANDBY F'fi INTER::: 10% :
I
M ISC:ELLANEIIII-IS
I
I

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 176 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 120 of 142

7.

8I

.
.
.

f
I

,La

I
I

4
I

____________

TOTAL SET S / B F A I N T I N G STAFF

I
I

356.4. (I)(

-----------------------------------l------------~---------------~--------------.

L.

S E T WATCHMEN
WATCHMON ( P / D A Y )
WATCHMAN
E X T R A WATCHMAN L A E S R
0 . T. S E T WATCHMAN
MISCELLANEOUS

I
I

45:

150. (10:

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
8

I
I

I
I

.(I)
675(:).
(:I(

(I)(

CI-15-10167

.(111

I
I

&75.0(

-,---------------------------------~------------~---------------~------------T O T A L S E T WATCHMEN S T A F F

7425.

I
I

1
I

I
I

I
I

1o :

30o. CIO :

01
3000. (11.

I
I

I
I

(:I(

,----------------------------------I------------'---------------*--------------.

M.

FIREMEN/POLICEMEN
FIREMAN (P/DAY)
FIREMAN
POLICEMAN (P/DAY)
POLICEMAN (P/DAY)
P O LICEMAN
P O LICEMAN
E X T R A F I R E / P O L I C E LABOR
0 . T. F I R E M E N / P O L I C E M E N ( 1 0 % )
MISCELLANEOUS

I
I
1
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

II

I
I

I
I

:
250. oo :

40 :
20 :

1C I O C ) ~ .CI
5000. c:

250.00

.0
.

0 1

(1).
1S Of:) (1:

-----------------------------------I------------'---------------l--------------

TOTAL FIHEIPOLICE

STAFF

19:::
00 C!

-----------------------------------I------------'---------------l--------------

WRANGLERS
ta
t
S P C A MAN
I
H E A D WRANGLER ( P / D A Y )
WRANGLER
*
WRANGLER
TRAINER
E X T R A A N I M A L LABOR
O. T. WRANGLERS ( 10%
MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------'------------'---------------i-------------T O T A L WRANGLER S T A F F
I

0.

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

(-1

(-1

.(1:
(11.

.Ci

.
.C .
(-1

...............................................................................
P.
TEAMSTERS (NOTE: 1 MAN F'ER ! ! ! ) : (NOTE:
. 5 / W : 1 WHOLE WEE/::)
:
CAMERA ( P/WK
10 :
22(:)(:)
.0(:):
I
I

G R I P (F/Wt<)
ELECTRII:
(P/WK
S E T C:IIINTRI-ICT IGIN ( F/Wt< )
ART DEPT (P/WK)
PROP ( P/WEEK 1
WAHDHIIIBE ( F / W K
MAKE-UP (P/WK
HONEYWAGON ( P/WK )
HONEYLJAGCIN (F'/G!!I )
:3F'EC.iAL F X (P/Wt:::)
F'ICt:::-I-IF' $:ERVICE (F'/Wt:::)
N 1GHT
1l-1141 ( 5 EIAY:; ) -s(:)%
O. T . TEfiM:3TER:3 ( 10%1
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

1
I

I
I

a
I

I
I

a
t

a
II

a-.

I
I

3.4 :
8.4:
Z.4:
5:. 4 :
3.4:
:.C. t

2. 4 :
9:

L
--I
- II

a1

Page 54 of 76

.0

I
I

I
I

.(-1

.
.

.
.C'
.(1;

225)(:)0 (11

1 &.(:I0 a(:):
1&.(:I(:). (:I(] :
1600. OC) :
1 &.(:I(:). O ( j :
1Gc:)O. 0 0 :
1 &(:)(:I (:)a :
1 6.00 .(1)(1) :
1 /.<I (1.(1)(1) :
1 /-.1:) (1) .(1)(1) :
1: :1 4 (1) C) (1)(1) :

.
-

4
I

4:3[)0. (1
1:344(:).c
13440. (:
1344(:).1:
13440. i
1344(::
'

"-j : r-.

.
1 44(3(3.
s.:.-I
.~

,-., 4 (-)

1-

(;I

&7(:)0.(:,

1.2374. (:;
05.03.2007

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 177 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 121 of 142

10.

S E T r:ONI=;TRIJi:T

IClN

DAY!:;/WEEKS

RATE

TOTAL

-----------------------------------I------------*---------------~-------------.

A.
AA.
F.
C:.

D.
E.
F.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

11.
12.
13.
14.
15.

10.
17
13.
19.

-. LC).

21.

PRODI-KT I O N D E S I G N E R ( P / W K )
ART D I R E C T O R
ASST ART D I R E C T O R
S;k,'ETcH A R T I S T
DRAFTSMAN ( P / D Y
SET SUPERVISOR ( P / D Y )
MISC: F X / B L t I G S / t I R E S S I N G S :
MUTANT F X (sea + s o r e e t c )
BANDSTAND
PIER
SHOOT ING GALLERY
C A S T L E OF TERROR
VIC'S OFFICE
CONTAM IN A T E D BEACH
E;HER IFF S T A T I
ClN
DCiC K L E I I \ J ' S
K T L V NEWS S T A T I O N
R I C E ' S APT
LlLTR I MA INSTI TI-ITE
D I V E R ' S HOUSE
M O L L I E ' S FAR
PI-ITLER HOl-ISE
C:HARLIE'S I 2 A B I N
B A R N E Y ' S HfIiI-I:SE
R O L L E R CCiASTEF\:
WRECKED P L A N E
C:lIINTF;'CILLERf
RRlIlH
MUTANT FX MAN H%W ( P / D Y 1
R IGG ING G R I P L A B O R ( P/Wt< 1
:E;TF; 1I::1NG
BQC:K 1NGS
IIiREENS

20(:)(:).

I
I

16:

I
I

I
1

I
I

I
I

I
I

II

1
I

2:

2 5 ~ j (. j O :

15:

CI-15-10167
I

8
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

I:

I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I

[
I

1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:

.I

.
4(:)(:).
3750. I
.
- 1

250. OC) :

I
4

320(:)(:).
I

1:
1:
1I
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
a>,=
4 18

8:

1 1 lcs~ro.0 0 :
1 o<)(1)0 (:I C) :
5(1)(3(1) (1(1) :
500. (:to:
.5000.i)(j:
50(1) 00 :
5 (1)(1) (1)(1) :
5 i)(:l (1) :
30(I)(:) (I)(] :
1 ooo. 00 :
300(:).
:
5000
:
500.00 :
500. ()(I) :
:I;(:)(:)(:)
(10:
80(1)(1). 00 :
20(1). ( j O :
SO(:).
:
5(:)(110 (:)(:I :
50(:).()a :
131 (:)(I) :

.
.

.
.
.

.
.

400.O.Q:

I
I

I
I

I
8

aI

I
I

t
I

aI

.
.

1 1 1 (1)(1)0
1 C) (11(1)0 .:
5~:)
(1)0 (
500. .
5(1)(1)(:) .:
5 (:I 0 .
5 (1,(1)
(

c -La (-) (-1

:30(1)(1). I
1
3 (1)(:I (1) '
5 (1)(1)
500.
5;c)O. i
:3(j00. c
S0(30.1
Zc)(:). 1
50(:).:
5 (1)(1)(1) :
c
.-I (-1
- (1)
2ts:35
2:2 (1)(11

.
.

.
.

.
.

-----------------------------------I------------*----------------l-------------

T O T A L S E T CONSTRUCT I11iN

2(:)5185.

-----------------------------------l------------;---------------l-------------

1 1.
A.
I3
C:.

1 .

E.
F.

S E T O F E R A T I N G EXPENSES:

I
I

C;
I
.
1
I

C. I
a=s

[,!&Z
;.:.
.,
.,,7
L ,

I
I

G.
H.

I
I

C:AMERA E12UI FMENT R E N T A L S


C:AMERA EI;!I-I I PMENT PI-IRCHASES
VTR F'LAYEAC:K R E N T A L
IZAMERG CRANE R E N T A L S
WARDRI:IEIC PI-1RC:HA:E;ED
;,k;iTp,Lz;
WARtfROBE MA INTENANCE
G R I P Ef;!U IPMENT R E N T E D

;-.:t-,

aI
I
I

1:
1:
1:

.-.cs ,
:>
-. ,
I

.-.

1
I

a=-

PROF' EC.!.!r-lI F'MENT R E N T E D

.=,

C.1 I C - I - . U A . ? C T ,

C.C.I-IC..:-

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 55 of 76

.=a

t
I
t

5 (1)(1)(1) (1)(1) :
' 7 -0 0 (1)(1) :
1 5 0 (j (1)(1) :
2(:)(I)(] (](I) i

- .
.

..
.
.
.

3(>(:)(:)(:)
(:I(:)
:
c (-1-(-1
- (1)Q :
4 (1)(1) (1)(1) :
2(11(1)(1) (1)(1) :
5 (1) (1) (1) (1) :
.-I

1 C; 1-1 1 3

i-11-1

.
.
.

4 0 (1)(:I (1)
1 t.(:)i)
1 50(11
20 (1)(1) .
3(1) (1)(1)(1:
4 r_1 ,:. .
33:)(:)
1 6.(1).C,0 0 ..
4 0(:)(:)
.,
?:(

1 .?(-I [-)I-)

05.03.2007

t-..

PKLII-'::.

._.

FiENlEIl

c=o

I-.

.-,

.-.

.8
-*x8

,
9

61

_I

1-1

3 1 ,

'I' I
.-'

.
. :
:: (1) 0 (1) :
:;: .0 (1) :
-

c (-I()
-

,I

2 (1, :
4 (1) :
L
.

S:

I(:

.-. ,
1'1

1
I

1
I

-.a

:3 :

c
u
L*

.-I

()(:I

3(:)00.
<I(:, :
45(:). <)(I:

.3 I

1I

1
I

.
.

a81.
_*

700. c)o :
4 5 0 . 00 :
450.00 1
2000.00 :
2()0(3 ( 1 0 :
CI-15-10167
700.00
:

I
4

1t

3:

I
I

1
I

II

1:
1:
21

I
1

i
l

1
8

300. (10:
100.00 :

300.00 :
4 0 0 . 00 :
100.00:
400. 00 :
200.00:
100. 00 :
100.00:
200.00 :
100.00 :
2(:)c).0 0 :
1(:)
00(
: I.
4 0 0 . 00 :
20(:). 00 :
500.00 :

'-,
I

1:

r. I

L'

I
I

5:
1:
1:

1
1

c.
.-.

1:
1:

II
1

--,
I

L I

1:

2:
.-a

8I

TOTAL SET OPEHATI ON EXPENSES:

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
1 (1)Thursday,
(1)(1) (1) (1) : November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
/1,(:)(1,.
:
***Electronically
Filed***
2(1) (1)Nov
(1) (1, (1) :
20 2015 06:18AM
25(:,.Andrew
00 :
Gamber
2.y(1) , (1)(1) ;
4 (1)0 (1) I:( (1) :

--,-,----*

2 (:I(1)(11 . (1)(11 :

. :1

CI-15-10167
Lancaster County
of Common Pleas Page
L.
~ROFS-LI:IS::;
RNDCourt
LIQMAII;E-~%
, 178 of 198
Advanced
MediaEl;!I-I
Group
Page 122 of 142
M.
:I;C!l-INB
I PMENT RENTED
t\l.
WALt::I E TALI:::IES RENTEL1
111. Nl-1R:I;EKY F'URI::HASE[I
AND RENTED
:
f .
MAt:zE-l-lF' Fl-lRCHA:I;ES
G!.
HA I RDFtE::::3 ING PI_IRC:HA::;E:3/RENTAL::;
:
R.
ELECTR IC:AL EI;!I_IIPMENT RENTALS
;
S.
E L E C T R I C A L EQll IPMENT F'I_~RI::HA::;ED :
T.
GASOLINE-RENTAL VEHICLES ( 1 0 x 2 ) :
U.
~3ENERATOFi RENTALS ( GAS ONLY
V.
S P E C I A L F X RENTALS/PURC:HASES
W.
PROP TRUCE RENTAL
X 1. WARTIROBE TRUCK RENTAL
XZ. SET DRESSING TRUCE RENTAL
X 3 . SET CONTSTRUCTION TRUCK RENT
:
X4. HONEYWAGON 1
t
X 5 . HONEYWAGON 2
,
X 6 . MAKE-UP THAILOR RENTAL
Y.
P I C T U R E V E H I C L E RENTALS:
Y1. BARNIE'S BOAT ( P / D Y )
Y 2 . CHARLIE'S BOAT ( P / D Y
a
Y3. DIVER'S BOAT ( P / D Y )
V4. COAST GUARD BOAT ( P / D Y )
Y5. R I C K ' S CAR ( P / D Y )
I
Y 6 . AMBULANCE ( P / D Y )
Y7. PAM'S CAR ( P / D Y )
Y8. J E S S I E ' S CAR ( P / D Y )
I
Y9. PICK-UP TRUCK ( P / D Y )
I
Y 1 0 . P O L I C E CAR ( P / D Y )
a
Y11-BARNEY'S ROVER ( P / D Y )
Y I Z . P O L I C E WAGON ( P / D Y )
t
Y13.STAN'S
CAR ( P / D Y )
Y1S. C. GUARD CAGE ( P / D Y )
I
Y16.VIC'S
BOAT ( P / D Y ) I
ZCAMERA BOAT RENTAL (F'/DY)
ZZ. M I S C RENTALS/PUHCHASES ( 5 % )

I
I

I
1

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

--------

.----'---------------II

I
I

tI

.----:---------------I-

-----------------,-----------------'-I------

12. LOCAT I O N :

I
I

I
I

I
I

A.
B.
C.
C1.
D.
Dl.

A I R F A R E S (NY-LA)
HOTEL-DIR/PRODUCER-NY
( P/MO 1
MEALS (PD 2 X 1 7 X 7 ) EIIR/PFC'OD NY
MEALS (PD 2 X 1 7 X 7 ) DIH/PROD N J
L O C A T I O N S I T E S RENTAL:
BANDSTAND AREA ( P / D Y )
D2. A I R F I E L D ( P / D Y )
D3. P I E R ( P / D Y )
D4. BOAT R I D E ( P / D Y )
D5. SHOOTING GALLERY ( P / D Y )
DG. CASTLE O F TERROR ( P / D Y )
D7. V I C ' S O F F I C E ( P / D Y )
D8. CONTAMINATED BEACH ( P / D Y )
D9. SHER IFF STAT ION ( P/DY
rl10. DOC t < L E I N N S ( P / D Y )
D 1 1 . K T L V NEWS S T A T I O N ( P / D Y )
F 1 2. THE DOCyI.::: ( F'.;DY )
D13. R I O K ' S APARTMENT ( P / D Y )
D14.ULTRIMA INSTITLITE (P/LIY)
D15.DIVER'!s Hlrrl-lSE (F'/EIY)
D 1 G . I I O L L I E FEES F A R ,(F/KlY)
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

10:
4:
3C.C'

&&.em
1

1.5;k.O. 00 :

11(1) (1)(1) (j
(1) :
100. 00-I_

.>.>qI
L.-.C

75.00

I
I

I
I

:3 :

200 ()(:I :
4 0 0 . 00:
1000. 00 :
75(:). 00 :
5(:)(?.
(10 :
75(1). (10 :
300. 00:
150(:). 00 :
10(:)5) 00 :
E:(:)0 00 :
55)(j. (jc) :
1 S(:)c). 00 :
750. (I)()
:
15(:)0. (:)(:I :
50 (3 (11(1) :

1 !

C I
.-I
I

I:
8:
1:
1:
10:

1:
4:
.i
-,

1
1

.-I

1;
<r

i
l

C' It
.-I ,
C I

Page 56 of 76

.
.
.

(->(-I

(->

I-> (-1 !

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 179 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 123 of 142
t l 1 7 . El-ITLER HI:IILI::;E
( F/DY )
[IlE:. IIHARLIE":_: [ : A D I N ( P / D Y )
I:119. C:HARLIE":i; [ICIC:~::: ( P / [ I Y )
D31. 1_7lIlNTR1]LLER.':f; Rr:l:lPl
( F / [IY
t121. ROLLER ClIlASTER ( F'/DY )

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
1(1)(1)Nov
(1) (1)20
(1) : 2015 06:18AM
:: )(: (1)(:I )(: (:
75 (1, Andrew
(1)(1) : Gamber 2 25 (1) (1) (:
: : 1 (1) (1) (1)C
:>0 (1) (1)(1) :
.- (I)c,: (1) (1
2(j0.(:)(:I :

Q.

R.
S.
T.

:I:(1,(1)(1) (1)(:
- .

I
I

O F F I C E RENTAL-WILDWOOtI(P/DY
OFFIIZE El2IlIPMENT (F'/WP:)
,
E D I T RM RENT-W 1LtlWOi1t1 ( P/DY )
CAR RENTALS-2 C? 8 NO
BUS RENTALS (CREW-ROUND T R I P )
:
M I N I VANS ( 6 VEH C? 2 NO)
L A TO NY DRIVER-HOTEL h FD/DY
:
SUNDRY EMPLOYEES ( 6 P A / 10 WK')
:
E D I T O R I A L EQUIP-WILDWOOD ( F ' / M O ) :
1
G R A T U I T I E S (P/WK)
I
SCOUTING ti PRE-PRODUCT I O N
PERMITS
CREW ENTERTAINMENT
OTHER - I D L E SUN ( S X 5 5 )
OTHER
CREW HOTEL
I
OTHER - CREW P.D.
(60x56)
OTHER - I D L E SAT ( 8 x 5 5 )
OTHER - WILDWOOD PHONE (F'/WK)
:
MISCELLANEOUS
8

II

I
I

I
I

.
. C)(.

.00 :

1(:)(:)(:)

E.
El.
E2.
F.
G.
GI.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
0.
P.

.
.
.
.

II

II

8(3. (110:
9/-.(1)(1).
OC
450. (ji):
7650. (:I(:
c C) (1)(:
40. 0(?:
1(1)4 (11(1) (1)(:
650.00 :
1150 0i
1150. 00 1
96(:)(:)0(:
8C)C).00 :
2 1c10. a(:
150. 00 :
250.00:
15(:)(?0.
CI-15-101674275. (I(:
1900. 00 :
(I(
500.00 :
50(?0.0(.
1500.00 :
3000. (I(
200.00:
:34(:)0.OC
1000.00 :
100C)O.O(
90.00 : F .1 .
3960(1.o(
4 - ~ : ? ~ , ' : . 104(+0C);-[)C
40.00 1
10400(:).
90. 00 :
396C)(?.0 :
900.00 :
15300. (1
.-a

.I

C.

.
.
.
.

J J

(!

l
e

II

I
I

--------------;--------------

-----------------------------------I-------

TOTAL LOCATION EXPENSES:

I
I

-----------------------------------I-------

I
I

.i.

543:335. (1;

--------------(--------------

I
I

13. TESTS AND RETAKES:


A.
TESTS/RETAKES- 1 DAY EA :
D I R OF PHOTOG ( P / I l Y
CAM OPER ( P / D Y )
MIXER ( P / D Y )
BOOM ( P / D Y
GAFFER ( P / D Y )
KEY G R I P ( P / D Y )
PROPMASTER ( P / t l Y )
WARDROBE ( P / D Y )
MAKE-UP/HAIR
(P/DY)
SCRIPT ( P / D Y >
PAM (P/LIY)
RICE (P/DY)
OVERT IME ( 10%
>
E. IJNDERWATER PHOTOGRAFHY:
4 ROUND T R I P TO F L O R I D A
M I A M I HOTEL ( 4 X 2 )
PER D I E M ( 2 X 2 )
CAR RENTAL ( P / D Y )
CAMERA RENTAL ( P / D Y >
INCIDENTALS ( P / D Y )
UNDERWATER D I R PHOTO ( P/DY
UNDERWATER c7AM AS:3T ( P / D Y )
E:.ECTF:IC:
(P/trY)
ELECTRIC ( P / D Y )
ELECTRIC: ( P / D Y >
GRIP ( P / D Y )
GRIP
(P/~IY)
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

I
I

.(1.

I
I

600.00 :
340.00 :
275.00 :
235.00 :
235.00 :
235.00 :
235.90:
235. 0(:):
235. oo :
235.00155(1).00 :
550.00 :
I
I

12(:)0. 0
k.30. 0

550. (1)

.
.
.
.

4 7(1) (11
470. (7
4 70 0
470. O
47(1) (1'
4 70 (1)
4 7(:I 0
55(:).[>
5 5 ~ 1c;.
682. c>

.C'
.

I
I

6.00. 00 :
100. 00 :
50. (I(:, :
50. (10 :
500. 90 :
2(:)(:).
<)(I
:
5(1)0 (1)c1 :
500. 0 C ) :
23:). (:)(I:
2:3(1) (I)o :
2: (1) (1)0 :

.
.
.'. - .(1)(I)
.-..- (I) .(I)(I) :
- - .
C'(-)

L ' - a

L -1:

Page 57 of 76

2400 (1)
3(:)(:)(11
2C1@.(1
1 (:I(:)
(1.
1 (1)(1) cj
4(:)0.(.:
10(I)O.(I!
1(1)(1)(1: 1.-c
n /
:
,5(-(>.
..
54.0 (1;
5 6.(1) (1;
3/.(1) (1;

.
.

.-,

05.03.2007

.
.
.

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 180 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 124 of 142
:3AFTEY 11
I VER ( F ' / l I Y )
lIlN 1I:fiMERA [I I VER ( F'/ DY )
/:::IT FEE ( F L A )
ClVERT I ME ( FLA- l O % )
N 1:~;C:ELL+?NEI~II-I~
F 1LM tc F'F;I:IC:ES;S
( :SEE ~ C I S )T
I
t

.L

20 :

4
I

TI~ITRL TE:Z;TS AND RETAKES:

I
I

.-I

I:.

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
2:E:C)
. (y) (1) r
5 6.(1) (1)(1)
***Electronically
Filed***
- (11
(1)
;
7k. (1) (1)(1)
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
5 (1) .Andrew
(1)(1) :
1
0
0(I)(:)(:I
Gamber
4.6 : (): (1)
,
0 (1)

II

I
I

I
I

I
@

I
I

I
I

I
I

.
.
.
.
.
.
2(1)7 5 (1) . (1)(1)
(:)(:I

-----------------------------------I------------~---------------'---------------

-----------------------------------'------------;--------------TOTAL SET LlESIGN/LOCATION/TESTS:

---------------

................................................................................

103&.&.87.
5C)

CI-15-10167

................................................................................
14. IZUTT I N G F I L M LABORATORY
: tlAYS/l-JEEES :
RATE
I
I

TOTAL

--,--------------------------------~------------l---------------~--------------I

I
I

E D I T O R (P/WK)
ASST EDITOR (P/50 HR WK)
SOUND CUTTER ( P / 5 0 HR WK)
MIASIC CUTTER ( P / 5 0 HR WK
N E G A T I V E CUTTER ( P / R E E L )

4.
E.
C.
D.
E.

tI
I
I
I

I
I

I
I

:2 :

--.

N E G A T I V E P I X RAW STOCK ( F / F T )
:
G.
N E G A T I V E SOUNI! RAW STOCK ( F i / F T ) :
H.
TRANSFER F I L M TO V I D E O ( P / H K )
:
I. DEV A C T I O N (NO TAX P / F T ) C! 65% :
J.
XFER SOUND (NO TAX P / F T ) @ 65% :
E. P R I N T A C T I O N ( 1 2 ( I ) K x 0 5 % ) - I N C L T A X :
L
F'R I NT SOl-lND ( 146K:<&5%
> -INCL TAX :
M.
MAGSTR IPE-PRODUCT ICiN P/REEL
I
N.
MACiSTR IPE-SCORE.~IDUEB INla/P/REEL
:
1 .
INTERNEGAT IVE
aI
P.
INTERPOS IT IVE
a
3.
hNSWER P R I N T ( I N O L TAX)
I
R.
CI:IMPI:ISITE
CHECK P T ( I N C L TAX )
:
:=7.
FADE/DISSOLVE/DUPE/FINE GRAIN
:
T.
T I T L E S - M A I N k END
aI
1-1.
PROclECT ION-W ILDWOlSD ONLY-NC@LAE :
V.
CI:[I ING-SYNC SOUND P / F T
I
W.
CClDING-W I L D TRACE P / F T
t6
X.
MOV IOLA RENTAL ( P/WK
I
I
Y.
REELS % LEADER (P/WK)
1
Z
C:UTT 1NG ROOM !::llPPL 1 ES
AA. STOIZK SHOTS
I
EB. /:::EMh SUPPLY RENTAL
Ia
CC. ED I T O R I A L CREW OVERT IME ( 10%) :

I
II

I
t

-----------------------------------'------------*---------------'-------------7-,
I 1-1 i
iz:!-!TT 1 :<:;,
1 ., ,.
- .Is;;& 7 .11fi)':

--

1(1) :

2400. 00 :
1000. 0(1):
1425. OC) :
1425.00:
53:). (10:

aI

24 :
24 :
10:

8a

F.

. h3 ~ :6
.025 :
c
-1

I
I

1257 :

(-I.-.
- - II

.:3375:
(j
-3c.I
&a%.

10 :
10:
1.11:
1.11 1
1:
..::A5 :
4C) :
1:
:3 :
1.5:
1.5:
24 :
-24:
24;
1:
15:

L,

Zz(1) (:)(I) :

7:30(:)0. (30 :
9 1000. 06 :
7:3000. 00 :
1(1)(30.o(51

:30

.
.

)(:

:EX:) 00 :
'.?50(:), (10:
C/5(:)0. 0(j:
1(:)(:I (:)I
00 :
75(:)0. 510 : -

:
12(j(jo (:I(:) :
2(j(1) C) (1) :
-5'500.00 :
c.. .-I(-)(-)
~ - e - .C)(] :
13;).

tj(:)

.
.

150.
5(j
13 1 )
3(1)(1)(1)
1y j 0 .

00:

.(j(3 :
.(1)(1) :
.0 (1) :
:

I
I

I
I

-\

-:

120000. (20 :
14(1(1(:)(:) o(j :

576.(:)0. (I(
24(j(?O.(I(.
1425(1).()I(
114(1)(j.
d.-I(-1
ec
- (-1- (1),:
(1)i:
39 1~ ( 5 . 0 ; :
350(1).Oi..
lzz(). (:)
1(j(j38. /,(:
2730. (:I(:'
24325. (:)(I;
345:::. (jC:
3(1)(1) (1)(:
E:(1)(11 (1)c;
1(115 4 5 c): (1:
10545. (I(:'
1ocjOc:). (:)(
3(3E:7 st:.
6000 ,c: (1:
12 (1)(1)0 (1)(I.
16 0(1) (1)(1:
14250. (:I(:.
14 25(j (:I(::
:.. 6 00 (I
(I)
12(2 (1) (1) -1
:: 6.(1)(1) i t r:
:30 (1)(1) (1)
2:35(1) (1) (1) (1;
11275. (:)(:I

.
.

.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
*

.-,.-. L
.=..:*q
--..:.,qi

-----------------------------------'------------;---------------l---------------

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 58 of 76

05.03.2007

(I)!T'
i

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 181 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 125 of 142
_____--____________--.--------------'-I----------~---------------'--------_
1 5 . MI-1;:;

1 11::

II

<

0
I

FF\'ENII:H L IC:/:::-l::l~l:~;T TlIl C:lIlMF'LETE


I_II\I~IER:~C:IIIRE-I~:I~I:~T
TI] C:l:lMF'LETE
TRANSFER.:;
:sTIIIC:t:x (TAX 1NC:LIJDED)
EDITINO (P/REEL)
M I :f;rZELLANElSUS ( 5%)

A.

B.
C.
[I.

E.
F.

----,------------------------------*------------*---------------;-------------TOTAL MI-IS1C:

:
II
I
I

II

I
I

.Us-.-

1I
1I
(1):: :

1
-.:-.a

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
12 (1)(1)(1)(:I
(:I :
I 2 (1)(11(:) (1) . (11
:(I
(1)(11(1) (:) (1) :
:3(1) (1)(1)(1) , (11
15 (1)(1) (1) 1
4 5 (1) . (1)
15 (1)(1)(1) 0 (1) :
.a
.. .-I.>
c.-,c
1(1)(1)(1) 00 :
1 (:)(1)(1)(:) (1)

'2
.. II

10 :

.
.

.
.

a
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

.
.
.
.

.-t

(-)

(-1

1rCa140:_:.
5

-----------------------------------;------------l---------------'-------------I

1(-.

::;ilUND :

I
I

I
I

A.

E.
C.

D.
E.
F.
Y

I .

H.
I
J.
K.
L.
M
N.

0.
P.
I!.
;

R.
S.
T.
1
1
.

Dl-ISBING ROOM RENTAL


LABOR FOR PRE-DUB,
ETC (HHS)
LAPIIR FOR DUB ( 3 M I X E R / 3 0 HR)
F'OWER S T A T I O N @ ADD 50%
SOUNF FX PACKAGE ( P / R E E L
STOCK (PRE-DUB P / R O L L I N C L T X )
STOCK (DUE P / R O L L I N C L T X )
ADR, LClOPI NG, NARRATICIN ( P / H H )
!STOCK ( RENTAL
TRANSFERS (P/HH)
STOCK INCLIJEIING TAX
L ~ I C ~ELI
P ITOR:?;
WALLA GROUP
FOLEY (SOILNTI F X / H R )
STOCK (RENTAL)
TRANSFERS ( HOURS
STOCK INCLUDING TAX
FOLEY WALKERS (HRS)
DUPE TRANSFER
STOCK 1NC:LUtIING TAX
SCREEN ING ( F/HR )

I
I

22;
18:

90 :

I
I

I
I

II

10 :

:
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

101
10:
36 :
10:
15:

.C)2(s.b:

1:

1:

I
I

45:

1
I

aI
I
I

I
I
I

I
I

10:
15:
.02&.4:
36:
3:

.026G :
8:

CI-15-10167
tI

20(j. 05, :
4 C) (1 c) :

.
(1) .c (1) :
z[;)(j(:)
.(1) :
/; (11

I
I

f-1

26.4.3 :
6 3 . 5'[3 :
250. @(I :
215. (30 :
75.00 :
3(1)(3(1)(3 (1)(1:
.:.-.
. .-,
s=(1)(1) (1) 0 :
:3(j(j(:).
00 :
2 5 (3 (1)(11:
.-,c (:)C) :
75. 00 :
3(:)(:)(5 (1) o(:) :
L O . 0~:):
75 (1)(1) :
3:0
)(1)0 (1)(3 :
.-I (-1
- (1)~:) :

.
.

L -1

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.-*
- (1) .i)
5 (1)(:) (1)(11.(1)

4 4 0 (1)
7 2 (1)(11 (1)
54(:)(30.(1)
.Xs-/
A a-m
C*(-1

24.t..c

.
.

c.:35' (1.

9(1)
(1
250. c
1125. c
798. 0
35CHI (1)
3C 1 0 (1) 0
11250. CI
2 5 (3 (11
1125. (3
7.33. c:
2 16,(1) (1)
6.(1)(1) (I!
7 9 c. (-!.
4(11(1) (:!

.
.
.

a-

#-,

.
.
.
.
.C!

-----------------------------------;------------1---------------*--------------

TCITAL SI:ICIN[I:

1:34359.::

-----------------------------------+---------;---------------a-------------I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

II

1
I

-----------------------------------;------------s---------------t--------------

GRAND TOTAL CI_ITTING/FILM/LAB

...............................................................................

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 59 of 76

/.7*5"39 1 9

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 182 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 126 of 142
17.

F'l-1tLIC:ITY:

G!I-/ANTI TY

I
8

A.

AKIVERT 12;I NG
I
I
E. 1-IN I T F'I-IBL IC: ITY F'ER::;l:lN
I
I
C:.
ENTERTAINMENT
I
[I.
TRA[IE/NEWSPAPER SUBSCR 1PT IONS
:
E.
PI-1BLIC:I TY ST I L L S SALARIES
I
a
F.
PI-IFL IC: I TY ST I L L S St-IPPL IES/EQI_I IP :
13.
F'I1FLIII:I TY S T 1 L L S L A B CHARCiES
I
H.
S T I L L GALLERY RENTAL/EXPENSE
:
I. TRAILER
I
.-I.
PRESS PREVIEW EXPENSE
8
1
I:::.
SUPPL IES/PnSTAC;E/EXPRESS
tI
L
MI SI:ELLANEIII-IS
I
I
M.
OTHER
I
N.
OTHER
0I
0.
OTHER
II
I

.
.
.(1

TOTAL PUBLIC ITY:

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically
Filed***
RRTE
I
T 111
T iiL
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber
(.

(:

I
I

1I

tI

I
I

I
1

8I

I
1

1
I

8
1

1a

.i
.
.
.
.
(:

(.

(.

(.

tI

tI

aI

I
I

I
I

I
I

. (1

a
1

4I

.-

.(:
.
(:

-----------------------------------;------------;--------------18.
A.

B.
C.

D.
E.
F.
13.
H.

I;

MISCELLANEOUS
VACATION ALLOWANCE (DGA)
RETROACTIVE WAGE CONTINGENCY
SI-INDRY UNCLASS IF I E t I EXPENSE
CIIISTS
IN SUSPENSE ( E PEETERS)
SET COFFEE
WATER %
. .ICE
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER

T I ~ T A L M I SlZELLANEl:lU!::

1F/.

1NSURANC:E/TAXE!E;/L 1CENSE/FEE!Z:

I
48

aI

I
I

I
I

I
I

.a7292 1

:
1

8I

41

oo(:).

1 : ( 50,

aI

8:

k.CI

I
I

S:

6 (1(1 (3(:I

a
I

at

aI

aI

0I

81

t
1

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

I
I

.t

(I(:)
)

.
.
.
.

.O C ) :

4::: (11 0
4:30(1)

(
(

.
.(1
(.

(.

.C

19121m

CAST 1N!slJRANC:E
NEGATIVE 1NSURAblrI:E
L IFE IN:XIRANCE
M ISC:ELLANEI~I-I!~1NSI-IRANCE
I::OMF' Zc PI-IELIC: L I A B I L I T Y I N S
S1:rCIkL :3ECI-IR 1.rY T&X
F'ERSONAL PRlItPERTY 1NSLIRANIZE
W1IlRk::ER .':f; C:I]WFENSAT 1IIIN TAX
1I:IltIE C:ERT IF I C:ATE - MPAA
C I T Y TFiX AND LICENSE
1-INEMPLI:I\'MENT TAX ( I T A T E
IINEMF'LIIYPIENT TAX ( F E D )
HZrW/F'ENS ION-NAFET ( F'/EIY )
F'ENyZ;I ON F'LAN-C!IIi# ( 5 . 7(:):3%
)

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

1:

.
.i
.i
.i

CI-15-10167

(:

(.

.
.
7.5(1) (1) .
.
&.&,27:3.
?.
.
43:::45. :I:(:
(I)(I) .
.
-=,4 7.~-2
(
(

(:)

(.

.-.

j.-.

7 4 1 5 . '.
74(:)91:)
.;
7 4 5:::

Page 60 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 183 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 127 of 142
1
F'AYROLL :!;ERVIC:E ( WA IVELI )
N.
NI::;~::ELLANEI:II-I:::
1-1.
CITHEK
t,
F'.
OTHEFi
I:!.
OTHER
I

I
I

II
I

4.

II

aI

1I

I
4

----------------:------------:---------------:-------------I

TOTAL IN:SI-IF(ANCE/TAX /L IC:ENSE/FEES:

.c
.--;1 1 -: .=:1 . :.
-I._

--------------------I------------:---------------:-------------I
I

20. GENERAL 1:lVERHEAD:


I
A.
F L A T C:HARGE
I
I
E.
C:CIHF'ORATE OVERHEAD EXPENSE
I
C.
CASTING O F F I C E S A L A R I E S
II
D. ENTERTAINMENT-EXECUTIVES
,
t
I
E.
TRAVEL EXPENSE-EXECUTIVES
I
I
F.
S F F I C E RENTAL AND EXPENSE/P MO I
F1. O F F I C E R E N T A L S / S U P P L I E S / P WK
:
G. AUDITClR
I
H. T IMEKEEPER
I
I. SECRETAKI ES
8
I
.-I.
P U B L Ii: R E L A T I O N S HEAD
I
1::.
P U B L I C R E L A T I O N S SECRETARY
I
I
L.
LEGAL FEES ( P / H R )
I
M.
FOSTAGE/TELEPHONE/P W E
I
N.
CIJST1:lMS
BROKERAGE
I
I
O.
GENERAL OFF I C E OVERHEAD
eI
P.
F I L M SHIPPING
a
I
T.
OTHER
a
I
1-1.
OTHER
0I
V.
ClTHER
I
I
I

CI-15-10167

I
I

.;

TOTAL GENERAL OVERHEAD:

I
I

1I

-----------------------------------,------------:---------------:--------------21.
A.

FINANCE
S ROE I

I
I
I
I

C.

n.

Cl~lMPLETI O N Bi:lNu-Nl:l
CONT 1NGENCY

CLAIMS

I
I
I
I
I

-<.:.
C"
,1(I(:)
&

I
I

.05:
4 0(1)0 000 (10 :
.a2751
4000000. 00 :
.c)275:(4(~[~o[:)[:)(:).i)~:))
:
:33/.7.5[:)
00
2.:
.l:
I

.O

-----------------------------------:------------:---------------;--------------

206 :)00.
(I(
1 1 )(IC)C). (11,

.o(

33/-.75[:).
2:

-----------------------------------o------------:---------------:--------------.

GRAND TOTAL BELOW THE L I N E

I
I

I(:) 11(-).529;

__------------------------------------___-----------------------------------/ '7

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 61 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 184 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 128 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

May 21, 1987

Stan Caterbone
Financial Management Group
1755 Oregon Pike
Lancaster, Pa. 17601

Mr.

CI-15-10167

Dear Stan:
At your request I've investigated the requirements of the Completion Bond.
Bert Schneiderman of Worldwide Completion Services in New York
has given me a figure of 5+%, excluding contingencies, with a
50% No Claims Bonus. Since Bert also owns BonBon Payroll Service
he has agreed to waive the payroll fee if we use their bonding
service,
Requirements: They need copies of the budget and/or production
board, resumes for the director and producers as well as copies
of their contracts and any other production agreements which
have been completed.
Further they need to know when we will commence principal photography, editing location and if we intend to have a distribution
deal up front.

I spoke to Jerry Vandersonde and Bill Hudson of DeWitt Stern Insurance in Los Angeles, who were recommended by Worldwide. Since
I couldn't show him a budget or a script we did some educated
guessing and came up with a figure of approximately $75,000. The
Production Package policy should include: General liability, cast
insurance, negative film, faulty stock and camera processing,
props, sets, wardrobe, rented equipment, extra expenses, third
party property damage, non-owned auto, Errors and Ommissions
including a one year bond and a minimum workmen's comp policy
for anything that is not covered by workmen's comp.

I understand you're going to Wildwood this weekend. We need to


house a crew of about 60-80, production offices, catering service.
We'd like to get as many free extras as possible and need high
quality promo type giveaways. For screen credit, of course. If
you have any such contact we'll need mutant dolls (500?) and if
you can h ~ l pbrinq dow? lor~'<cn costs that would be great. I'm
tzikrng about beaches, aricsezents, the pier, parking facilities.
p:-ob~L
p k r SCII

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

TY

-3

h?~?!'=

f5=* 1

Page 62 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 185 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 129 of 142

FLAT
M s . E l l e n Libman
Power S t a t i o n , I n c .
4 4 1 b7est 53rd S t r e e t
New York, N.Y. 10019

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Dear E l l e n :
B a r b a r a a n d I h a v e mapped o u t a s k e l e t o n s c h e d u l e f o r o u r t r i p
t o N e w York a n d I t h o u g h t I ' d s e n d i t o f f a n d see i f i t w o r k s
f o r e v e r y o n e e l s e . By t h e way, w e ' v e d e c i d e d t o s t a y i n N e w
York u n t i l T u e s d a y i n s t e a d o f Monday a s o r i g i n a l l y p l a n n e d .
Thursday

A r r i v e a b o u t 3:OOPM. You h a v e t h e e x a c t t i m e
s i n c e y o u ' v e booked o u r f l i g h t s .
Please let
u s know i f someone w i l l p i c k u s u p o r i f w e
should take a t a x i .
W e ' l l come t o Power S t a t i o n a n ? g i v e y o u a n d

Tony c o p i e s o f t h e s c r i p t a n d b u d g e t w h i c h w e ' d
l i k e you t o r e a d Thursday n i g h t .
B a r b a r a a n d I h a v e a d i n n e r m e e t i n g w i t h a Direct o r of Photography.
Friday

Leave f o r New J e r s e y i n t h e morning. D i s c u s s


s c r i p t and budget.
Meet Mayor o f Wildwood and b r i n g him a s y n o p s i s
o f s c r i p t which h e h a s r e q u e s t e d .
Meet w i t h S t e v e G a r e l i c k , t h e P r o d u c t i o n C o o r d i n h t o r o f t h e N e w J e r s e y F i l m Commission.
Look a t l o c a t i o n s .

Saturday
Sunday

S t a n C a t e r b o n e a r r i v e s i n N e w J e r s e y . Meet t h e
r e p from Maury's P i e r t o d i s c u s s l o c a t i o n costs.
Check o u t h o t e l s f o r c r e w a n d c a s t .

Monday

L a s t m i n u t e S e t a i l s i n New J e r s e y .
L e a v e f o r Mew York a r o u n d n o o n .
M e e t i n g s a t Power S t a t i o n f o r f i n a l d i s c u s s i o n s
about s c r i p t , budget, contracts, etc.

Tuesday

Tuesday A f t e r n o o n
L e a v e N e w York a p p r o x i m a t e l y 4 F Y t o a r r i v e
L o s A n g e l e s a b o u t 9PM.
I ' l l t a l k t o you a g a i n b e f o r e w e l e a v e
i n planning your schedules.
4334 STERN M..SHERMArd OAKS. C A 91
cc: S t a n C a t e r b o n e
(616) 905-3C;7

arbara
ADVANCED MEDIA B
GROUP

Peters

Page 63 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 186 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 130 of 142

FIATBUSH
F LMS,NC.

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

M s . Ellen Libmn

Power Station, Inc.


441 West 53rd Street

NAJ York, N.Y. 10019

CI-15-10167

D e a r Ellen:

Let's t r y it again. This time we are scheduled to leave Los Angeles


on Thursdzy, 3~124 =id r2tu.m t3 L3s Arigsles cii T~esZa-;., 2.,z?e 9. 3.e
f o l l m h g is a rough schedule.
Arrive a b u t 3:OOPM. Please l e t us know the exact
f l i g h t information as soon as possible so we can
arrange aAprt t r a n s p r t a t i o n here. L e t us h o w
if sa-neone will pick us up in New York o r if we
should arrarge t r a m p r t a t i o n to Power Station.
Also l e t m e krvJw what hotel we w i l l be booked a t
in New York so we can leave that information here.
We'll ccrne to Power Station for any discussion
r e g a r m the s c r i p t and/or budget.

Barbara and I have a dinner meeting with a D i r e c t o r


of Photography.

Friday

Leave for New Jersey in the ~mrning. Meet with


Steve Gorelick, the Production Coordinator of the
New Jersey Film Carmission. Look a t locations.

Saturday

Stan C a t e r b n e arrives in New Jersey. Meet the rep


r a n Maury's Pier t o discuss location costs.
Check out hotels for crew ard cast.

Iast minute d e t a i l s in New Jersey.

Ieave f o r New York a m u d m n .


Meetings a t P a e r Station f o r final discussions
about script, budget, m t r a c t s , etc.
Additional meetins in mrning i f necessary.
W v e New York appr-tely
4R.I to arrive Los
Angeles about 9R1.
Please l e t m hxx if y m have any additions o r changes. I ' l l probably
talk t o w u again on Wrday.

wards,

cc: S t a n Caterb31le
Barbara Peters

Arlene
4334 STERN AVE., SHERMAN OAKS.CA 91423
(818) 995-3417

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 64 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 187 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 131 of 142

FLATBUSH
F IMS,NCl

ENTERED AND FILED


PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Monday,
November
LANCASTER,
PA 23, 2015
***Electronically
Filed***
Thursday, November
5, 2015
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

J u n e 1 2 , 1987

Mr. Stan Caterbone


Financial Management Group
1755 Oregon Pike

CI-15-10167

Lancaster Pa. 1 7 6 0 1
Dear Stan:

As you requested here's a schedule for Project 4 4 1 (mrking t i t l e ) :


PFE-PrnCrION

June 28-Julv 11, 1987


July 12-Sep't 5 , . 1987

New York

New Jersey

8weeks

New Jersey

8 5 day weeks

POSFPRODUCTION

Nwenber 1-January 30,1988

New York

In order to s t i l l g e t the film made this season we've got to speed everythug
W e originally planned four weeks of pre-production in New York lxlt that's
rn longer possible. If we start June 28 we've got only ten weeks to g e t t h e
mutant effects going a d then w e ' l l have to schedule mutant scenes later in

up.

the film i f they aren' t ready.


This schedule also takes us to October 31 f o r the end of the shoot, which means
we've got to schedule exteriors f i r s t , leaving the i n t e r i o r s f o r later in the
w e n t of bad weather.
S i x e we're on such a t i g h t schedule I can't r e a l l y break down the costs f o r
you because it w i l l a l l start h a p p n h g so quickly. W e ' l l imnediately have a
New York office, per dim, btel and coneacted fees f o r Barbara and myself.
W e ' ll h i r e a casting director, production manager, p r d u c t i o n coordinator ard
location manager, g e t the mutant e f f e c t s started a d begin hiring key personnel.
I f p check the m e t you'll see the actual number of weeks of employrent
f o r new. There w i l l be legal fees f o r pcepariq contracts. Wing those tm
weeks we' ll hopefully do mst of the casting.

4334 STERN A N . , SHERMAN OAKS. CA 91423


(818) 995-3417
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 65 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 188 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 132 of 142

ENTERED AND FILED


PROTHONOTARYS
OFFICE
Monday, November
23, 2015
LANCASTER,
PA
Thursday, November 5, 2015
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

IXlring the eight weeks of pre-production in N e w Jersey w e ' l l be m r m


with the art director, costane designer, s e t decorator, building s e t s ,
tying d m locations, e t c

A week before shooting the f u l l crw w i l l be prepping. The editor w i l l


a r r i v e a t about t h a t lime and w i l l be mrlung on a rough cut during the
entire shooting period.
A t the close of production Barbara, the editor an3 I w i l l m e back to
New York f o r a three m n t h editing period a t the en3 of which we will
deliver the finished film, includmg d i s t r i b u t o r ' s requirements an3 the
MPAA rating.

CI-15-10167

As you can see this w i l l be very tricky but I s t i l l think we can do it


i f Barbara ard I are in New York no l a t e r than June 28.
Hope this helps.

cc: Tony Bongiovi


Barbara P e t e r s

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 66 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 189 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 133 of 142

Advisory, Inc.
r

C-

11. 7755 Oregon Pike

Laocaster, PA 17607

777-569-4100

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

ftYAWCUI N A N I C r M t U I U O U P LID

STANLEY J. CATERBONE
PRESIDENT

May 29, 1987

CI-15-10167
Mr. Joel ~oidhammer
Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, Abbott
2 Penn Center
Suite 1800
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Dear Joel:

I received the enclosed correspondence regarding Power Station


I have yet to have a chance to review this, however,
Studio.
I thought it might be helpful.
Please keep all of this on
file as confidential and please do not make any communications
with anyone until I learn more about the situation.
Power Station does not know that I have you working on this
yet.
Good Luck.
a

Sincerely,

Stanley J. Caterbone
SJC:lmk
CC

encl

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 67 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 190 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 134 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically
Filed***
wNov 20 2015 06:18AM
ABBOTT,P. C. Andrew Gamber

---

L A W O f FICES

SEIDEL,G O NDA, GOLDHAMMER&

PATENT A N D T R A D E M A R K A T T O R N E Y S
S U I T E 1800 TWO P E N N C E N T E R

PLAZA

P H I L A D E L P H I A . PA. 19102
ARTHUR

TELEPHONE:(PIB) 5 6 8 - 8 3 8 3

H. SEIOEL

J O E L S. GOLDHAMMER
MICHAEL P. ABBOTT

2 5 J u n e 1987

TELEX: 8 4 5 - 2 1 6
C A B L E : SIPAT
T E L E C O P I E R . ( P I S I 568- 5 5 4 9

GREGORY J. LAVORGNA

G R O U P I , I 1 6 111

DANIEL A. MONACO
R O 9 E R T H. HAMMER Ill

EDWARD C . GONOA

THOMAS J. DURLING

(1930- 1985)

STEPHEN J . MEYERS
AMANDA L A U R A N Y E *

OF COUNSEL
SYLVIA A. G O S Z T O N Y I
STANLEY H. Z E Y H E R

NANCY A. R U 9 N E R
SCOTT J . FIELDS

CI-15-10167

* D C 6 NY BARS ONLY

M r . Stanley Caterbone
FMG A d v i s o r y , I n c .
Eden P a r k I1
1 7 5 5 O r e g o n Avenue
L a n c a s t e r , PA 1 7 6 0 1
RE:

Power S t a t i o n
Our F i l e :
7351-G

Dear Stan:
C

I h a v e now r e c e i v e d t h e r e s u l t s o f a s e a r c h
I have a l s o reviewed t h e f i l e
p e r t a i n i n g t o t h e above s u b j e c t .
f o r w a r d e d w i t h y o u r l e t t e r o f May 2 9 .
T h e f o l l o w i n g i s my
a n a l y s i s and e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e r i g h t t o u s e "Power S t a t i o n " a s
d e f i n e d below.
As I understand the situation, your business c l i e n t ,
Power < t a t i o n S t u d i o , h a s , s i n c e 1 9 7 7 , o p e r a t e d a r e c o r d i n g
s t u d i o with a widely regarded reputation f o r providing high
The
q u a l i t y recording s e r v i c e s using s t a t e of t h e a r t equipment.
e n c l o s e d r e p o r t r e v e a l s t h a t Power S t a t i o n s t u d i o h a s r e g i s t e r e d
t h e t r a d e m a r k "Power S t a t i o n " f o r sound r e c o r d i n g s t u d i o s .
(See
You h a v e a s k e d m e
Reg. No. 1 , 4 3 3 , 3 2 8 r e g i s t e r e d March 1 7 , 1 9 8 7 . )
t o i n v e s t i g a t e t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f Power S t a t i o n e x p a n d i n g t h e u s e
o f i t s mark i n t o m e n ' s a n d women's c l o t h i n g i n c l u d i n g b e a c h w e a r ;
and f o r audio and video e l e c t r o n i c s f o r consumers and
I have assumed t h a t t h i s l a t t e r c a t e g o r y i n c l u d e s
professionals.
radios, television receivers, video c a s s e t t e recorders, a u d i o
r e c o r d e r s , compact d i s c players, turn tables, amplifiers,
r e c e i v e r s , t u n e r s , c o n t r o l p a n e l s , mixing b o a r d s a n d c o n s o l e s ,
among o t h e r t h i n g s .

B a s e d u p o n t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e e n c l o s e d s e a r c h , i t is
my o p i n i o n t h a t i t w o u l d b e i n a d v i s a b l e f o r Power S t a t i o n , I n c .
t o u s e i t s m a r k f o r c l o t h i n g a s a f o r e s a i d . T h e b a s i s f o r my

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 68 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 191 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 135 of 142

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
-Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
2 5 JAndrew
u n e 1 9Gamber
87
~A

Mr.

S t a n l e y Caterbone

o p i n i o n i s R e g i s t r a t i o n No. 1 , 4 3 1 , 2 4 2 r e g i s t e r e d M a r c h 3 , 1 9 8 7
f o r "Power S t a t i o n " .
The r e g i s t r a n t c l a i m s a f i r s t d a t e o f u s e
of A p r i l 3 , 1986 f o r women's c l o t h i n g i n c l u d i n g swimwear a n d
o t h e r goods as l i s t e d .
A l t h o u g h y o u r c l i e n t h a s a s t r o n g r e p u t a t i o n , and
a l t h o u g h i t h a s p r i o r i t y of use f o r t h e mark, t h i s r e g i s t r a n t h a s
a s t r o n g p o s i t i o n f o r arguing t h a t it has superior r i g h t s f o r
women's c l o t h i n g .
One w o u l d n o t o r d i n a r i l y a s s o c i a t e c l o t h i n g i n
CI-15-10167
a n y way w i t h r e c o r d i n g s t u d i o s e r v i c e s .
Thus, your c l i e n t ' s
r i g h t s i n i t s mark d o n o t a p p e a r t o d o m i n a t e t h o s e o f t h e
registrant's.
A c c o r d i n g l y , u s e o f t h e Power S t a t i o n m a r k f o r
women's ( o r m e n ' s ) c l o t h i n g w o u l d i n v o l v e a s i g n i f i c a n t r i s k o f
being accused of trademark infringement.
Use o f t h e P o w e r S t a t i o n m a r k f o r c o n s u m e r a n d
p r o f e s s i o n a l a u d i o a n d v i s u a l e l e c t r o n i c e q u i p m e n t r a i s e s some
i s s u e s , b u t o n t h e w h o l e I am o f t h e o p i n i o n t h a t i t i s
permissible.
Again, I assume, a s I have been informed, t h a t t h e
Power S t a t i o n s t u d i o i s w e l l known a n d d o e s h a v e a g o o d
G i v e n t h a t , i t s movement
r e p u t a t i o n f o r its e x i s t i n g s e r v i c e s .
Here t h e g o o d
i n t o e l e c t r o n i c equipment s h o u l d be p e r m i s s i b l e .
w i l l a s s o c i a t e d w i t h i t s c u r r e n t s e r v i c e s c a n b e more r e a d i l y
extended to audio v i s u a l e l e c t r o n i c equipment.

T h e s e a r c h r e v e a l s t h a t M a n v i l l e C o r p o r a t i o n ' s Ken
C a r y l R a n c h i s t h e o w n e r o f t h e mark " P o w e r S t a t i o n " f o r b a t t e r y
o p e r a t e d emergency e l e c t r i c a l power s u p p l y u n i t s .
S e e Reg. N o .
1 , 0 4 0 , 3 9 8 r e g i s t e r e d May 2 5 , 1 9 7 6 a n d c l a i m i n g a f i r s t d a t e o f
u s e o f November 2 3 , 1 9 7 0 .
I n my o p i n i o n , a u d i o v i s u a l e l e c t r o n i c
equipment c a n be c o n s i d e r e d to be s u f f i c i e n t l y u n r e l a t e d t o
emergency e l e c t r i c a l power s u p p l y u n i t s t o a v o i d a l i k e l i h o o d o f
c o n f u s i o n even though t h e marks a r e i d e n t i c a l .
I r e a c h t h e same c o n c l u s i o n
a p p l i c a t i o n by E l e c t r i c a l C o n d u c t o r s , I n c .
power s t r i p .

r e g a r d i n g t h e pending
for a multiple outlet

A c l o s e r q u e s t i o n is r a i s e d b y G o u l d ' s S u p p l e m e n t a l
R e g i s t e r r e g i s t r a t i o n f o r Power S t a t i o n f o r m i n i a n d
microcomputers.
G o u l d ' s mark i s r e g i s t e r e d o n t h e S u p p l e m e n t a l
R e g i s t e r u n d o u b t e d l y b e c a u s e "Power S t a t i o n " a s a p p l i e d t o
computer equipment is considered to b e d e s c r i p t i v e .
A
Supplemental R e g i s t e r r e g i s t r a t i o n h a s none o f t h e p r o c e d u r a l
Moreover, i f
benefits of a Principle Register registration.
G o u l d ' s u s e of t h e m a r k is l i m i t e d t o a p a r t i c u l a r m a r k e t w h i c h

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 69 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 192 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 136 of 142

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
2 5 JAndrew
u n e 1Gamber
987
A

Mr.

Stanley Caterbone

is d i s t i n c t f r o m y o u r c l i e n t s , t h e r e d o e s n o t a p p e a r t o b e a
likelihood of confusion.
T h u s , G o u l d may b e s e l l i n g i t s
computers i n t o a s p e c i a l i z e d commercial market i f i t is p r e s e n t l y
s e l l i n g computers a t a l l .
Next I c a l l y o u r a t t e n t i o n t o t h e f a c t t h a t s e v e r a l
r a d i o s t a t i o n s have a d o p t e d and a r e u s i n g t h e t r a d e m a r k "The
Power S t a t i o n " i n various c i t i e s throughout t h e United S t a t e s .
Conceivably, t h e s e radi'o s t a t i o n s c o u l d o b j e c t t o t h e
CI-15-10167
i n t r o d u c t i o n o f consumer e l e c t r o n i c s i n t o t h e i r m a r k e t a r e a on
t h e g r o u n d t h a t t h e u s e o f t h e s a m e mark i m p l i e s s p o n s o r s h i p b y
I n o t e t h a t a l l o f t h e s e m a r k s were r e c e n t l y r e g i s t e r e d ,
them.
and I s u s p e c t t h a t a l l of t h e s e r a d i o s t a t i o n s are r e l a t e d or
c o m m o n l y owned.
I a l s o s u s p e c t t h a t t h e a d o p t i o n o f t h i s ark
may b e o f r e c e n t v i n t a g e .
Thus, your c l i e n t i n a n y n e g o t i a t i o n
w i t h t h e s e p e o p l e would h a v e t h e a d v a n t a g e o f b e i n g a p r i o r u s e r ,
and t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between r e c o r d i n g s e r v i c e s a n d e l e c t r o n i c
e q u i p m e n t o n t h e one hand and r a d i o s t a t i o n s e r v i c e s and
e l e c t r o n i c equipment on t h e o t h e r hand is a t l e a s t c o - e q u a l .
Thus, y o u r c l i e n t should have t h e dominant p o s i t i o n .
I n v i e w o f t h e f o r e g o i n g , i t i s my o p i n i o n t h a t T h e
Power S t a t i o n s h o u l d n o t a d o p t o r u s e "Power S t a t i o n " f o r men's
a n d w o m e n ' s c l o t h i n g , b u t i t may a d o p t a n d u s e t h e m a r k f o r
p r o f e s s i o n a l and consumer e l e c t r o n i c s a s d e s c r i b e d above w i t h t h e
u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h a t t h e m a t t e r is n o t e n t i r e l y w i t h o u t d o u b t a n d
issues could arise.
I t i s , h o w e v e r , my o p i n i o n , b a s e d u p o n t h e
f a c t s p r e s e n t l y a v a i l a b l e to me, t h a t The Power S t a t i o n , I n c .
should p r e v a i l i f those issues a r i s e .
I f you have any q u e s t i o n s c o n c e r n i n g
p l e a s e f e e l f r e e to c a l l me.

the foregoing,

With k i n d e s t p e r s o n a l r e g a r d s ,
Sincerely yours,
SEIDEL GONDA, GOLDHAMMER
& ABBOTT, P. C.

JOEL S . GOLDHAMMER
JSG:mp
Encl.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 70 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 193 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 137 of 142

JOINT Vf%TUilE PAKTICIPATICft AND CQflMBUTIQU

The u n d e r s i g n e d , i n t e n d i n g to be l e g a l l y bound, i n c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f h i s
adInissim as a p a r t i c i p a n t in the j o i n t v e n t u r e t o be known as "PWER PRO-

DUCTIONS I" an3 r e c e i p t o f a profit/loss d i s t r i b u t i o n s h a r e of

of

CI-15-10167

such j o i n t venture, hereby d e c l a r e s ard aclcmwledges h i s i n t e n t to participate

i n such j o i n t v e n t u r e and hereby covenants and a g r e e s to a n t r i b u t e t h e sun of


to t h e c a p i t a l o f such j o i n t venture, which sum s h a l l c o n s t i t u t e

h i s i n i t i d c a p i t a l account i n such j o i n t venture.

T h i s L e t t e r of I n t e n t is e n t e r e d i n t o by t h e u n d e r s i g n e d upon t h e
following general under stand ing :

Power P r o d u c t i o n s I w i l l be a j o i n t v e n t u r e t o be
formed u n d e r t h e l a w s of P e n n s y l v a n i a , h a v i n g t h e

.,
s p e c i f i c purpse t o i n v e s t (loan) its funds t o MUTANIA
PRODUCTIONS,

INC.

to

finance

production o f a motion p i c t u r e .

such c o r p o r a t i o n ' s
The j o i n t v e n t u r e

s h a l l r e c e i v e f u l l repayment o f i t s i n v e s t m e n t from
MUTAXIA PRODUCTIONS, I N C . b e f o r e the d i s t r i b u t i o n o f
any p r o f i t s to any party. T h e r e a f t e r , t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e
s h a l l r e c e i v e 50% o f t h e p r o f i t s from s u c h m o t i o n
p i c t u r e , o f which 85% s h a l l be d i s t r i b u t e d t o t h e

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 71 of 76

05.03.2007

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically
Filed***
mn-managing joint v e n t u r e r s ( i n c l u d i n g t h e underNov 20 2015 06:18AM
s i g n e z ) a n d 1 5 % s h a l l b e d i s t r i b u t e d t o S t a n l e y J . Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 194 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 138 of 142

C a t e r b o n e a s t h e Eanaging J o i n t V e n t u r e r o f Power
P r o d u c t i o n s I. Tbe j o i n t v e n t u r e s h a l l have a r i g h t o f
f i r s t r e f u s a l to finance t h e next movie p r o d u c t i o n o f
MUTANIA PRWKTIONS,

INC. and/or ' I W Y BONGIOVI

Tfte ckdersigned qrees t h a t he w i l l execute and d e l i v e r a counterCI-15-10167


c o u n t e r p a r t o f t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e agreement (which s h a l l be c o n s i s t e n t with the
a b o v e g e n e r a l u n d e r s t a n d i n g ) and t h a t h e w i l l execute and del'iver dl docunents required f a r t h e j o i n t venture to elect not to be t a x e d a s a p a r t n e r ship.
Contemporaneous w i t h t h e execution o f t h i s Letter o f I n t e n t , the undersigned is cmntributing 10% o f h i s total agreed c o n t r i b u t i o n , or $

r-3

w i t h i n f i f t e e n ( 1 5 ) days f r a n t h e d a t e hereof, time being o f t h e essence, t h e


-

undersigned s h a l l m n t r i b u t e t h e 90% balance, or $

Such c o n t r i-

b u t i o n s h a l l b e h e l d by S t a n l e y J. Caterbone a t i n t e r e s t , pending campletion

of alL n e g o t i a t i o n s ard execution ard d e l i v e r y of iii documents w i t h MuTA~IA


PRODUCTIa~S, INC.

I f s u c h n e g o t i a t i o n s , d e l i v e r y , and execution are mt m ~ l e t e dw i t h i n


t h i r t y (30) days a f t e r the f u l l c o n t r i b u t i o n is made, the e n t i r e c o n t r i b u t i o n ,
w i t h all i n t e r e s t earned thereon, s h a l l be returned to t h e d e r s i g n e d without

demand.

S t a n l e y J. Caterbone s h a l l ' be r e s p o n s i b l e f o r c o l l e c t i o n , receipt,

i n t e r i m i n v e s t m e n t and management, and u l t i m a t e investment or r e t u r n of a l l


f d s m t r i b u t e d , and s h a l l be t h e Managing J o i n t V e n t u r e r o f t h e j o i n t

venture.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 72 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 195 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 139 of 142

The u n d e r s i g n e d h e r e b y a u t h o r i z e s and

ENTERED
FILED
Monday, AND
November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
anpokers S t a n l e y J. Andrew
Caterbone
to
Gamber

n e g o t i a t e , execute, and d e l i v e r a l l d o c u m e n t s n e c e s s a r y or r e q u i r e d t o
implement t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e p u r p s e and to t a k e all other a c t i o n s an3 n q o t i a t e , execute and d e l i v e r a l l o t h e r d o c u m e n t s n e c e s s a r y

or d e s i r a b l e t o

implement or e f f e c t u a t e t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e pnpose.

SIGN

CI-15-10167
( L . S . ) Date: May

NAME:

,1987

NAME:

ADDRESS:

CITY:

STATE:

ZIP:

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 73 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common PleasPage 196 of 198


Advanced Media Group
Page 140 of 142

RICHARD C. FOX, PC.


ATTQRNEYS AT LAW

1015 ROBERTj VALLEY ROAD

ENTERED
AND FILED
Monday, November
23, 2015
PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
Thursday, November 5, 2015
LANCASTER, PA
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA inlo


RICHARD C FOX'
('ADMn'TED ALSO FLORIDA)

May 20,

S t a n l e y J. C a t e r b o n e
FMG A d v i s o r y , I n c .
Eden P a r k 11, 1755 Oregon ' p i k e
L a n c a s t e r , PA
17601

1987

Mr.

CI-15-10167

For P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s rendered i n connection w i t h


Power P r o d u c t i o n s I , i n c l u d i n g c o n f e r e n c e , p r e p a r a t i o n o f
L e t t e r o f I n t e n t , a n d e x p r e s s m a i l i n g , .and f o l l o w - u p t e l e p h o n e
check.

P r o f e s s i o n a l Fee
8

UdP.S.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 74 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Page 197 of 198
Advanced Media Group
Page 141 of 142

ENTERED AND FILED


PROTHONOTARYS
OFFICE
Monday, November 23,
2015
LANCASTER,
PA
Thursday, November 5, 2015
***Electronically Filed***
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Ted Gotnillion, President

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 75 of 76

05.03.2007

CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


Advanced Media Group

Page 198 of 198


Page 142 of 142

ENTERED AND FILED


PROTHONOTARYS OFFICE
LANCASTER, PA
Monday, Filed***
November 23, 2015
***Electronically
Nov 20 2015 06:18AM
Thursday, November 5, 2015
Andrew Gamber

CI-15-10167

Gomillion: mini-major in the heart of Hollywood


O N F OF; the rtlo\r inlereclirlg

<iomillron also cpent time on


\ u c h T V \eriec as "fhe
Monroes". "Follow The Sun",
and "Jessie James".
Ted Gomillion wac the firct to
develop a mobile sound stlldio, a
specla1 trarler urlrt that 15
equipped to project "dailies"
and provide orr-locatior~"looprng".
"Our
unrque units hare
proven to be a ver) valuable aceet
arid have become a lucrati\e
\ o u r c e o f revenue."
\ard
(iomillior~,who offered that the
units habe been ured or1 Tiltnc
such as Sam Peckinpah'c "Jr
Ronner";
"Get-Away";
(it)lduy~l'\ "(ira\\tiopper".
"The Cir~ccon~
(;ango; Harhrn
Strercand'c "The blaln E \ e r ~ t " :
"Too
1 ate r h e I i e r o " ;
"Grizzly Adarns" arid "Tom
Horn". The round units have
also been used by such television
shows as "Canney
. & Lacev" and
"C'hipc"
Paramout~t and 20th ('enturq
The (joniillion Studioe facrlrFox.
The executi\c filni-milker tles are SO coniplete that each 01
spent seven years at the Fox r r c prc>ductronollicec can he (u\t
Studior, earned t w o Peahody about uced to live In while
Award\ for excellence, and was production i c in progress. kach I \
rnvolved with such notable equ~ppedu i t h a hart1 and kitchen
productions as "Rally Round area and there ic also R rectarrratlt
and
catering
f~~cilr
The Flag Pole". "State 1-arr".
"let's blake Lore". " F l a ~ i i ~ n g Addit~onally, a \ n u l l exerchc
room complete u r t h rauna.
Star" and "Way Way Out ".

By Ron Krueger

"\tarc~ol-the-art" facrlit~es in
lioll!uood IS rlie (;ornrllron
St~rdro\,Ireaded h \ lilrn ~ r ~ t l u r t r !
phrase ' n ~ i n i - r n a j o r ' . " \ard
veterarl Ted (iomrllion.
Gon~rllron rn d c t c r ~ h i n g his
The cry-hurlding cortiplex
\I\I~IOS.
prov~de\otle o l the mort techr~o(;omillron production chief
logically ad~anccdcourid \\age\
Adan1 (buck added tliar, " A l l
alorig with a 46-IIIIII
burldrng
they hare to do IS L.ortle in wrth a
contalnrng officec and editing
scrrpt and they can *alk out o f
\uites
here wrth a lir~rshedproduction.
The sound stage hac a 45-footWe have done w o r k l o r
wide. floor-to-ceilrng \creen.
cotnpaniec l'rorti all around the
ceare 150 people and i e one o l the
world, I t a l y , Mexico. The
few re-recording ctagec arourid
Philrppinet. the UK and rtlany
the world that 1s capahle o f
tnore."
handling any type o f f i l m
Ciomillion al\o taid. "LVc rake
format. including 70mrn sixgreat prrde 111 our wtirk.
track discreet. or video.
e\pec~allvnur looprr~gfacrlity lor
C o r ~ ~ p l e n ~ e r ~the
t r r ~ g\ophr\trforeign lilrnc."
cated projection sy\teni 15 an
(iornillion'c experience in the
equally advanced cout~d and
film industry cpanc 3 0 years a r ~ d
dubbing syctem which provides r t ~ c l u d e s e x p e r i e n c e
111
flexibilitv and extremely accurate
product ron and post -production
reproductron for re-recording or
at hl(;M. Drcney. rodd A - 0 .
playback o f anv eound format.
C'olu~tihia. Warner. lInlrer5al.

"We provide e\ery \errice.


frorii pre-production. cound
stage connectlone, location
\I~c>oting and
all
po\tproduction. I n other words, we
prorrde all cervicec and facilitiec
as the major jtud~oc around
town, hut at 3 fractiori o f the
co\t. That's why we corned the

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 76 of 76

weightr and jacurr~ ts a\ailahle


lo production execirtl\es u o r k ~ r ~ g
long hours.
-<iornillion own5 all of II\
burldrngc and tand, uhlch are o n
McC'adden Place In Ilollyuood
w ~ t h ~ an short distance from
nlarl) nlajor labc, sound stagec.
Set
and c o \ t u m e rerltal
companies and an excellent breu
o f the world famou\ "t4ollymood" cigr~which trtr in a \lately
poeirron high in the tlolly\rood
Hill\.
The latect connection thar
entrepreneur (i01111111011 ha\ jet
up to round out hi\ lacllit) I\
called I'oct I'ro ( oriiplerror~ IIIL.,
*I11ct1 I\ 21 l r r l ~ l r l ~ l r kl g
lllll ~~llll\
v.III gi\c u\ a conlpic~c;Irrarlperllerlt

Good investment
"Any film\ that hake had
major filming completed and u e
feel that there i c a eood investnient, our new financial agrecmetlt will give Ciomillion the
opportunity o f linichrng the
caid
post-production."
Gomillion.
"We \\rII ccir~lrr~rrc
to cxpar~ll
and add Inore properr\, hrrt ;]I
rhe moment. ire oller O I I ~ ot the
ir~
~I v
. c r t '~IIII~I-\IIIL~I~I\'ITI the
hu\ine\\ and rrght III the r ~ l ~ ~ i d l e
01 Clollvwood."

05.03.2007

Вам также может понравиться