Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 13 November 2014
Received in revised form 21 May 2015
Accepted 22 May 2015
Available online 12 June 2015
Keywords:
Rosemary extract
Frying oil
Heat treatment
Oxidation
Sensorial analysis
Stability
a b s t r a c t
The effect of rosemary extract (Rosemarinus ofcinalis L.), a natural antioxidant, on stability of frying
oil during heat treatment and on sensorial quality of fried potato was studied. A mixture of soybean
and sunower oils in an equal proportions and containing 0.08% of rosemary extract was evaluated for
thermo-oxidation at 180 C for 30 h. This evaluation was carried out comparatively to an oil mixture
without antioxidant. Results showed a signicant difference (p < 0.05) between oils according to the
measured parameters especially at the end of treatment. The addition of the rosemary extract in the
mixture of soybean and sunower oil reduce the peroxide value by 38% after 30 h of heating. This oil
resists to oxidation and conserves the higher amount of unsaturated fatty acids even after 30 h of heating.
The evolution of saturated fatty acid composition is estimated at 5.5% and 25% in the oil with and without
extract, respectively, at the end of the heating treatment. Sensorial analysis carried out showed that the
fried potato prepared in oil with rosemary extract had the best crispiness and taste until the fteenth
frying. The oil with rosemary extract showed an enhanced stability and therefore a best quality compared
to the oil without rosemary extract.
2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Deep fat frying is one of the most procedures used for preparing
food (Rababah et al., 2012). It leads to obtain products with appreciated sensorial properties. However, the limit of this technique lies
into the rapid deterioration of the quality and the stability of the oil
during its use in frying. This deterioration takes place following a
series of reactions leading to a qualitative and a nutritional change
(rancidity, discoloration and loss of essential fatty acids). These may
also be responsible for the production of toxic compounds such as
peroxides, aldehydes, and epoxides (Zhang et al., 2012).
Oxidation is one of the most signicant chemical reactions
occurring during the frying process. This reaction is inuenced by
several factors such as high temperatures, presence of oxygen and
presence of unsaturated fatty acids in a high rate, targets of this
reaction (Gupta, 2005). To improve the quality of the oil, increase its
stability and subsequently its duration of use, different approaches
593
Table 1
Characteristics of individual oil before mixture.
Oilsa
PV (meq O2 /kg)
Acidity (%)
UFA (%)
SFA(%)
Soybean oil
Sunower oil
2.8 0.03
2.1 0.06
0.05 0.01
0.03 0.01
85.73 0.12
87.32 0.18
15.12 0.10
12.74 0.12
PV: peroxide value; UFA: unsaturated fatty acids; SFA: saturated fatty acids.
a
Mean standard deviation (n = 2).
594
(Ablankcontrol Asample )
Ablankcontrol
100
(1)
meqO
2
(V Vb ) T
1000
m
(3)
PV
kg
(2)
V C M
10 m
595
Fig. 1. LC-DAD chromatographic prole of the rosemary extract (284 nm). Insert: UVvis spectra extracted from the chromatogram of (1) carnosol and (2) carnosic acid (A).
acid, respectively, (Almela et al., 2006; Chang et al., 2008). The MSchromatographic proles unambiguously conrm the presence of
carnosol and carnosic acid (Fig. 2). Indeed, the MS spectrum of the
pic eluting at 1.99 min exhibits a pseudo-molecular ion [M+ H + ]
with an m/z = 331.19, while the theoretical mass for the [M+ H + ] of
carnosol is 331.1909 amu. In the same way, the MS spectrum of the
pic eluting at 3.04 min exhibits a pseudo-molecular ion [M+ H + ]
with an m/z = 333.20, while the theoretical mass for the [M+ H + ] of
carnosic acid is 333.2066 amu. The pic at m/z = 287.20 amu (Fig. 2E)
is attributed to the loss of a formic acid molecule.
596
Fig. 2. LCMS Chromatographic proles and extracted mass spectra of the rosemary extract: (A) total ion current, (B and C) Extracted ion chromatograms at 331 amu
(carnosol) and 333 amu (carnosic acid), respectively, and (D and E) corresponding mass spectra.
However, peroxides products formed are still unstable, decomposes under frying conditions, giving rise to secondary products
such as carbonyl and aldehydic compounds (Abdulkarim et al.,
2007). The oil deterioration continues, but the peroxides formed
are no longer assayed. This therefore results in a decrease of PV.
This explanation conrms the phenomenon observed in control oil
in the last three days of heat treatment.
It should be noticed that the nature of foods frying seems to have
an inuence on the PV. In fact, Manral et al. (2008) reported that, in
the case of frying sh in sunower oil, the PV can rise from 0.1 meq
oxygen/kg to 28.98 meq oxygen/kg after 12 h of frying.
597
Fig. 3. Scavenging activity of BHT (0.1%), and rosemary extract (RE) at different
concentrations (0.02%, 0.05% and, 0.08%) against the DPPH radical expressed as
percentage of inhibition.
effectiveness of RE add to palm oil and use to fry potatoes for about
32 h where the acidity for this oil and the control is about 0.42% and
0.59% respectively.
The oil hydrolysis caused by the water effect introduced by the
fried food is a phenomenon that does not occur during our study
because the heating was conducted in the absence of food. The
increase in free fatty acids value is attributed in this study mainly
to the degradation of secondary oxidation products formed during heating and the presence of oxygen. The moisture that may be
provided by air could have an inuence on increasing acidity.
The decrease in acidity after 24 h and 30 h may be explained by
the evaporation of the volatile free fatty acids under the heating
effect. The polymerization of fatty acids during the heating process may also block the acids functions that are no longer assayed
(Ndjouenkeu and Ngassoum, 2002).
Fig. 4. Changes in peroxide value (a) and acidity (b) during heating of control oil (n)
and oil with RE ().
598
Table 2
Fatty acids composition of control oil and oil with RE during thermoxidation at
180 C.
Fatty acids (%)a
C16:0
Control oil
09.43 0.04
09.81 0.02
09.50 0.02
09.67 0.04
12.54 0.03
13.00 0.04
Oil with RE
08.61 0.02
09.26 0.05
08.72 0.03
09.36 0.04
09.91 0.01
09.26 0.03
0
6
12
18
24
30
0.12 0.03
0.13 0.02
0.11 0.02
0.12 0.03
0.15 0.02
0.14 0.03
0.10 0.02
0.10 0.01
0.12 0.03
0.12 0.03
0.18 0.02
0.11 0.02
C18:0
0
6
12
18
24
30
4.40 0.02
4.32 0.03
4.36 0.02
4.33 0.04
4.17 0.01
4.12 0.03
4.33 0.02
4.37 0.03
4.47 0.01
4.48 0.04
4.63 0.04
4.44 0.01
C18:1
0
6
12
18
24
30
23.25 0.03
23.64 0.04
24.00 0.02
24.02 0.04
23.54 0.03
23.72 0.02
24.17 0.05
23.88 0.03
23.92 0.03
24.07 0.04
24.03 0.02
24.05 0.03
0
6
12
18
24
30
57.09 0.02
56.74 0.04
56.56 0.03
56.60 0.05
55.00 0.02
54.70 n0.03
57.65 0.02
57.05 0.04
57.15 0.05
56.59 0.03
55.64 0.04
56.75 n0.03
C18:3
0
6
12
18
24
30
2.70 0.02
2.89 0.03
2.98 0.04
2.86 0.02
2.60 0.02
2.53 0.04
2.92 0.03
2.88 0.01
2.97 0.04
2.85 0.03
2.79 0.02
2.65 0.02
C20:0
0
6
12
18
24
30
0.44 0.02
0.37 0.01
0.43 0.03
0.42 0.02
0.34 0.04
0.72 0.03
0.43 0.01
0.42 0.02
0.45 0.02
0.40 0.03
0.45 0.02
0.41 0.02
C20:1
0
6
12
18
24
30
0.17 0.01
0.11 0.02
0.17 0.03
0.17 0.02
0.10 0.03
0.10 0.01
0.17 0.04
0.13 0.03
0.19 0.05
0.13 0.01
0.15 0.02
0.14 0.03
UFA
0
6
12
18
24
30
83.33 0.11bA
83.51 0.10aA
83.82 0.14aA
83.77 0.16aA
81.39 0.12bB
81.19 0.13bB
85.01 0.16aA
84.04 0.12aBC
84.35 0.20aB
83.76 0.14aC
82.79 0.12aD
83.70 0.13aC
SFA
0
6
12
18
24
30
14.27 0.08aC
14.50 0.06aC
14.29 0.07aC
14.42 0.10aC
17.05 0.08aB
17.84 0.10aA
13.37 0.05bC
14.05 0.10aB
13.64 0.06bC
14.24 0.11aB
14.99 0.07bA
14.11 0.06bB
C16:1
C18:2
ab: means within a row with different letters are signicantly different (p < 0.05).
AB: means within a column with different letters are signicantly different
(p < 0.05). (C16:0, palmitic acid; C16:1, palmitoleic acid; C18:0, estearic acid; C18:1,
oleic acid; C18:2, linoleic acid; C18:3, -linolenic acid; C20:0, arachidic acid; C20:1,
eicosenoic acid; UFA, unsaturated fatty acids; SFA, saturated fatty acids; RE : rosemary extract).
a
Mean standard deviation (n = 2).
Table 3
The Sensory characteristic scores attributed for potato crisps.
Sensory characteristica
Number of frying
Control oil
Oil with RE
Odor
1
8
15
5.4 0.16aA
4.6 0.26aA
3.7 0.42aB
5.5 0.22aA
5.0 0.21aA
4.8 0.38aA
Colour
1
8
15
6.0 0.30aA
5.6 0.22aAB
5.1 0.27aB
6.0 0.21aA
5.6 0.22aAB
5.1 0.17aB
Crispiness
1
8
15
5.7 0.26aA
5.3 0.30aA
3.9 0.34bB
5.9 0.23aA
6.0 0.25aA
5.7 0.30aA
Taste
1
8
15
5.4 0.16aA
4.9 0.34aA
3.2 0.38bB
5.5 0.22aA
5.4 0.22aA
5.3 0.26aA
ab: means within a row with different letters are signicantly different (p < 0.05).
AB: means within a column with different letters are signicantly different
(p < 0.05). RE : rosemary extract.
a
Means standard deviation for 10 subjects participating in the tasting test using
a 7 point hedonic scale.
Table 4
Regression between sensory attributes.
Odor
Color
Crispiness
Taste
Odor
Color
Crispiness
Taste
1
0.149
0.408
0.450
1
0.220
0.173
1
0.518
rated fatty acid composition. This extract was able to maintain the
sensory characteristics of fried product until the 15th frying. Further, studies are required to understand mechanisms with which
phenolics compounds inhibit or retard oxidative process.
References
Abdulkarim, S.M., Long, K., Lai, O.M., Muhammad, S.K.S., Ghazali, H.M., 2007. Frying
quality and stability of high-oleic oleifera seed oil in comparison with other
vegetable oils. Food Chem. 105, 13821389.
Almela, L., Sanchez-Munoz, B., Fernandez-Lopez, J.A., Roca, M.J., Rabe, V., 2006.
Liquid chromatograpicmass spectrometric analysis of phenolics and free
radical scavenging activity of rosemary extract from different raw material. J.
Chromatogr. A 1120, 221229.
Basaga, H., Tekkaya, C., Acikel, F., 1997. Antioxidative and free radical scavenging
properties of rosemary extract. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 30, 105108.
Chaiyasit, W., Mcclements, D.J., Decker, E.A., 2005. The relationship between the
physicochemical properties of antioxidants and their ability to inhibit lipid
oxidation in bulk oil and oil-in-water emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53,
49824988.
Chang, C.H., Chyau, C.C., Hsieh, C.L., Wu, Y.Y., Ker, Y.B., Tsen, H.Y., Peng, R.Y., 2008.
Relevance of phenolic diterpene constituents to antioxidant activity of
supercritical CO2 extract from the leaves of rosemary. Nat. Product Res. 22 (1),
7690, Formerly Natural Product Letters.
Che Man, Y.B., Jaswir, I., 2000. Effect of rosemary and sage extracts on frying
performance of rened, bleached and deodorized (RBD) palm olein during
deep-fat frying. Food Chem. 69, 301307.
Chiou, A., Kalogeropoulos, N., Salta, F.N., Efstathiou, P., Andrikopoulos, N.K., 2009.
Pan-frying of French fries in three different edible oils enriched with olive leaf
extract: oxidative stability and fate of microconstituents. Food Sci. Technol. 42,
10901097.
Erkan, N., Ayranci, G., Ayranci, E., 2008. Antioxidant activities of rosemary
(Rosmarinus Ofcinalis L.) extract, blackseed (Nigella sativa L.) essential oil,
carnosic acid, rosmarinic acid and sesamol. Food Chem. 110, 7682.
Frankel, E.N., Huang, S.W., Aeschbach, R., Prior, E., 1996. Antioxidant activity of a
rosemary extract and its constituents, carnosic acid, carnosol, and rosmarinic
acid, in bulk oil and oil-in-water emulsion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44, 131135.
Gupta, M.K., 2005. Frying Oils. Baileys Industrial Oil and Fat Products. John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
Huang, S.W., Frankel, E.N., Schwarz, K., Aeschbach, R., German, J.B., 1996.
Antioxidant activity of carnosic acid and methyl carnosate in bulk oils and
oil-in-water emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44, 951956.
Jaswir, I., Che Man, Y.B., Kitts, D.D., 2000a. Synergistic effects of rosemary, sage,
and citric acid on fatty acid retention of palm olein during deep-fat frying. J.
Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 77, 527533.
Jaswir, I., Che Man, Y.B., Kitts, D.D., 2000b. Use of natural antioxidants in rened
palm olein during repeated deep-fat frying. Food Res. Int. 33, 501508.
Lalas, S., Dourtoglou, V., 2003. Use of rosemary extract in preventing oxidation
during deep-fat frying of potato chips. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 80, 579583.
599
Liu, X., Dong, M., Chen, X., Jiang, M., Lv, X., Yan, G., 2007. Antioxidant activity and
phenolics of an endophytic Xylaria sp. from Ginkgo biloba. Food Chem. 105,
548554.
Masuda, T., Inaba, Y., Takeda, Y., 2001. Antioxidant mechanism of carnosic acid:
structural identication of two oxidation products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49,
55605565.
Manral, M., Pandey, M.C., Jayathilakan, K., Radhakrishna, K., Bawa, A.S., 2008. Effect
of sh (Catla catla) frying on the quality characteristics of sunower oil. Food
Chem. 106, 634639.
Michalowska, A., Korezak, J., 2007. Polyphenols- potential food improvement
factor. Am. J. Food Technol. 2, 662670.
Ndjouenkeu, R., Ngassoum, M., 2002. Etude comparative de la valeur en friture de
quelques huiles vgtales. J. Food Eng. 52, 121125.
Nogala-Kalucka, M., Korczak, J., Dratwia, M., Lampart-Szczapa, E., Siger, A.,
Buchowski, M., 2005. Changes in antioxidant activity and free radical
scavenging potential of rosemary extract and tocopherols in isolated rapeseed
oil triacylglycerols during accelerated tests. Food Chem. 93, 227235.
Nor Aini, I., Fatihanium, M.N., Razali, I., Suhaila, M., Chek Zaini, H., 2008.
Antioxidative activity of malaysian herb extracts in rened, bleached and
deodorized Palm Olein. J. Oil Palm Res. 20, 517526.
Norme ISO 3960, 1977. Corps gras dorigines animale et vgtale Dtermination
de lindice de peroxyde.
Norme ISO 660, 1996. Corps gras dorigines animale et vgtale Dtermination
de lindice dacide et de lacidit.
NT 118.05, 1995. Corps gras dorigine animale et vgtale Prparation des esters
mthyliques par chromatographie en phase gazeuse des acides gras.
Paul, S., Mitta, G.S., 1996. Dynamics of fat/oil degradation during frying based on
optical properties. J. Food Eng. 30, 389403.
Rababah, T.M., Feng, H., Yang, W., Yucel, S., 2012. Fortication of potato chips with
natural plant extracts to enhance their sensory properties and storage stability.
J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 89, 14191425.
Ramalho, V.C., Jorge, N., 2008. Antioxidant action of rosemary extract in soybean
oil submitted to thermoxidation. Grasas Aceites 59, 3841.
Richheimer, S.L., Bernart, M.W., King, G.A., Kent, M.C., Bailey, D.T., 1996.
Antioxidant activity of lipid-soluble phenolic diterpenes from rosemary. J. Am.
Oil Chem. Soc. 73, 507514.
Romano, C.S., Abadi, K., Repetto, V., Vojnov, A.A., Moreno, S., 2009. Synergistic
antioxidant and antibacterial activity of rosemary plus butylated derivatives.
Food Chem. 115, 456461.
Tortoe, C., Akonor, P.T., Nketia, S., Owusu, M., Glover-Amengor, M., Hagan, L., Otoo,
E., 2014. Evaluation of the sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability
of deep-fried yam (Dioscorea rotundata) crisps in the accra metropolitan area. J.
Food Nutr. Sci. 2 (1), 1923.
Zhang, Q., Saleh, A.S.M., Chen, J., Shen, Q., 2012. Chemical alterations taken place
during deep-fat frying based on certain reaction products: a review. Chem.
Phys. Lipids 165, 662681.
Zheng, W., Wang, S.Y., 2001. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in
selected herbs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49, 51655170.