Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Prepared for
Page | 1
201 0
CHAPTER 1 : AN INTRODUCTION
In England, during 19th century huge population growth resulted in the necessity of
building new housing to accommodate the exploding population growth. This scenario
led to the debate of constructing new houses versus protecting aesthetic environment and
contain urban sprawl. Research around the time of this debate has shown that the antiurban sentiments and desires for living in the rural areas were stronger in the society
(URBED, 1999). Equally there was a stronger aspiration for protecting environment,
greenfield by building high density housing areas and developments in the brownfield sites
if necessary (Popular Housing Forum, 1998). The National view of development in the
brownfield drove the UK governments strategy to development of 50% brownfield
development and re-use and cut the new household constructions to 3.8 million by the
year 1996 to 2021 (DETR, 1999).
The above mentioned scenarios resulted in establishment of Urban Task Force led by Lord
Rogers of Riverside to study (Carmona, 2001). The main concern of the Urban Task Force
was not to address the problems of constructing the new houses and finding the location
for development, but to identify the key issues of urban deterioration and long term urban
decline (Regan, 2000) and to propose key resolutions and action plans to revitalize the
whole appearance of the cities and towns in England making them ideal place for the
people to move back (Abbott et al., 2000). The whole concept of urban development
portrayed in the report of Urban Task Force- Towards an urban renaissance was founded
on the aspects of design excellence, environmental sustainability, social-wellbeing within
the feasible economic and legislative context meeting its commitments towards
environment in all the developments (Durant et al., 2004, Urban Task Force, 1998).
Urban renaissance in the UK as detailed in the report- Towards the urban renaissance,
envisions the sustainable development of cities and towns in England, must be in a way
that it underlines the key themes such as
1. Improving the recycling efficiency of land concurrently developing better and
aesthetic quality environment to attain the sustainable development within the
cities and towns (Allinson, 2005) (Carmona, 2001).
2. Creating a change in the public perception driving the change of negative to positive
attitude towards urban environments and quality of life (Urban Task Force, 2005).
Page | 2
3. Development
and
re-investment
in
environmental,
social-economic
infrastructures.
These key themes are founded on the combined principles of
1. Design excellence
2. Economic stability
3. Environmental development ad sustainability
4. Social-wellbeing
1.1 The drive of Sustainable urban renaissance in UK: Urban Malaise and public
attitude of urban life.
One of the major driving factors behind the concept of urban regeneration was the need of
the need of housing development. Although the aspiration of greenfield protection and
brownfield development was strong, anti-urban sentiments mainly drove the migration of
people to rural areas away from the cities resulting in dilapidation of towns and cities.
There are many driving factors of the above said anti-urban sentiments, and identifying
the root causes of this was the main intention of Urban Task Force (URBED, 1999)
There are various reasons for urban malaise and deterioration. Industrialization had a
marked effect on poor environmental conditions in the cities and towns and cities (Urban
Task Force, 1999). Urban Task Force when studied 20 different areas in South England
identified many major reasons of urban decline and peoples attitude of moving away from
the city. Major problems identified in this report were huge exploitation of natural
resources, environmental pollution (water, air, and sound), due to intensive car use
(Durant et al., 2004). Increased accesses to car transport have also created significant
impact contribution to environmental pollution (HM Govt, 1994; DoE and DoT, 1994).
In a research survey by the governments Countryside Commission, 54% of all adults in
the study area wanted to live in rural setting while only 6% would prefer a home in the
inner city (Schoon, 2001). These scenarios strongly driven the need of urban regeneration
plans to be prominent in England making cities beautiful places for the people live in
(While, 2006).
Table 1: Various signs of urban renaissance and Malaise identified within the urban
developmental context
Page | 3
underlying the concept of design excellence, reduced energy and water usages, better waste
management procedures, controlling pollution etc. are also placed at the center of
sustainable urban regeneration.
Transport lies at the heart of urban regeneration. Designing efficiently the transport
system such that it give priority to walking, cycling and public transport; and public
transport connecting city centers with strong sub-centers, non-polluting motor transport
etc. These are the clear strategies of sustainable development of urban areas developed and
discussed in the context of environmental management by Urban Task Force (Davidson,
1995, p.V). These key strategies are based on the principles of urban regeneration. Table 2
demonstrates
key
strategies and
development
and
DESIGN EXCELLENCE
Quality of design of homes and infrastructures underlining the needs of energy efficiency
housing, intensification, development of parks and open spaces, protecting of the green
structures and prioritizing brownfield development and biodiversity. Establishing
connections between houses, jobs and local services encouraging walking and public
transport (Carmona, 2001).
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT
Within the new urban development, the following environmental factors are needed to be
considered in detail to allow the best practices of sustainable regeneration
B IODIVERSITY
RUNOFF
Page | 5
Urban runoff and wash off of roads and other pollutants into river, drains and water course
are also main problem which is needed to be addressed. Absence of greenfield because of
extensive development, presence of hard surfaces, lack of spaces to contain the rainfall
water and lack of proper channel to facilitate the passage of rainfall to water course, are
mainly responsible for the wide impacts caused by the run-offs (Sundaram, 2010).
Sustainable Urban Drainage systems (SUDS), green roofs are important considerations
within the urban regeneration to address the flooding, run-offs and pollution. It also
ensures the preservation and blooming of biodiversity within the urban settlement (Farm,
2008).
POLLUTION
ENERGY
Page | 6
Table 3: The major pulling factors of urban and suburban development and relocation
Page | 7
Page | 8
More than 95 % of the buildings in the area was terraced with poor build quality
and were high rise
Page | 9
Environmental Regeneration
Establishment of pavements and pedestrian bridges and ways to encourage
pedestrians and cyclers through the riverside areas and development of dock edge
waterside walkway
2. construction of new open green spaces of 150ha
3. Development of water based ecology park and Bird sanctuary at East India Dock.
The area is characterized by
- Water based Ecology Park and London's first bird sanctuary at East India Dock
Basin - one of 17 conservation areas set up
- planting of 200,000 trees;
- the area has now received many awards for architecture, conservation and
landscaping
1.
Economic Regeneration
Page | 10
unemployment had fallen from 14% to 7.4 with a doubling in employment and
numbers of businesses;
- transport revolution - opening of the Docklands Light Railway in 1987 - now
carrying 35,000 passengers a week;
- 7.7 billion in private secotr investment
- 2,700 businesses trading
- major new roads including link to the M11
- Building of the City Airport in the former Royal Docks (500,000+ passengers a
year)
- attraction of financial and high-tech firms,
- TV studios and newspapers such as The Guardian now have offices in the
prestigious Canary Wharf business complex.
Page | 11
Social Changes
Page | 12
There were criticisms that despite the improvements many of these didn't benefit
the original 'eastenders' - click on the photo opposite to see some of the 'antiLDDC' graffiti.
- many locals were unable to afford the high costs of the new expensive houses /
flats (still a lack of low-cost housing in the area).
- despite an increase in jobs with new businesses coming in, most required skills
that the old dockers did not have;
- reduction in community spirit that the old Docklands had - with the 'yuppie'
newcomers not mixing with the eastenders.
Page | 13
Page | 14
Figure 2 Manchester
Source Punter, Planning and good design: indivisible or invisible? 2010
Page | 15
Page | 16
Page | 17
Even though the environmental design and build in terms of travel design, transport, open
spaces, proper residential developments etc. were good; it was just above par, leaving the
efficiency of regeneration practices in revitalizing the concept of sustainability. Figure 5:
Shows the representation of Performance indicators of urban regeneration in Leeds.
Page | 18
Page | 19