Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Instituto Politcnico Nacional, CICATA-Unidad Altamira, Km 14.5, Carretera Tampico-Puerto Industrial Altamira, C.P. 89600 Altamira, Tamps, Mexico
Instituto Politcnico Nacional, ESIQIE, Departamento de Metalurgia, C.P. 07300 Mxico D.F., Mexico
Universidad Iberoamericana, Departamento de Ingeniera y Ciencias Qumicas, Prolongacin Paseo de la Reforma 880, Lomas de Santa Fe, C.P. 01219 Mxico D.F., Mexico
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
CePO4
Nanostructures
Microwave-assisted hydrothermal method
a b s t r a c t
In this work, the microwave-assisted hydrothermal method is proposed as an alternative to the synthesis
of cerium phosphate (CePO4) nanostructures to evaluate the inuence of different synthesis parameters
on both the structural and optical properties. In order to reach this goal, two different sets of experiments
were designed, varying the reaction temperature (130 and 180 C), synthesis time (15 and 30 min) and
sintering temperature (400 and 600 C), maintaining a constant pH = 3. Thereafter, two experimental
conditions were selected to assess changes in the properties of CePO4 nanopowders with pH (1, 5, 9
and 11). The crystal structure and morphology of the nanostructures were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. Diffuse reectance properties of CePO4 with different microstructures were studied. The results
demonstrated that by using the microwave-assisted hydrothermal method, the shape, size and structural
phase of CePO4 can be modulated by using relatively low synthesis temperatures and short reaction
times, and depending on pH, a sintering process is not needed to obtain either a desired phase or size.
Under the selected experimental conditions, the materials underwent an evolution from nanorods to
semispherical nanoparticles, accompanied by a phase transition from hexagonal to monoclinic.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
In recent years, CePO4 nanostructures have become increasingly
important in a variety of applications such as uorescence, ion
exchange, catalytic materials and ceramic composite materials
with high mechanical properties [1] as a result of their low dimensionality and the quantum connement effect. The technological
application of these nanostructured materials is strongly dependent on their morphology, crystalline phase and particle size.
CePO4 presents two phases: monoclinic and hexagonal [2,3]. Few
studies on the production of CePO4 nanostructured materials have
been found in the literature. The hexagonal phase can be easily
obtained at low temperatures, while the monoclinic phase could
be prepared via the solid state reaction and hydrothermal method
at high temperatures [2]. Among these methods, the hydrothermal
synthesis seems to be potentially useful to obtain CePO4 nanostructures; the preparation of inorganic nano or micromaterials
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: mdominguezc@ipn.mx (M.A. Domnguez-Crespo).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053
0925-8388/ 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: D. Palma-Ramrez et al., J. Alloys Comp. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053
Table 1
Experimental design used to obtain CePO4 nanoparticles using a pH 3.
Experiment
at pH 3
Reaction
temperature
(Tr, C)
Synthesis
time
(t, min)
Sintering
temperature
(Ts, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
130
180
130
180
130
180
130
180
15
15
30
30
15
15
30
30
400
400
400
400
600
600
600
600
microwave-assisted hydrothermal method. For this purpose, variables such as reaction time, synthesis and sintering temperature
as well as pH of the media have been evaluated.
2. Experimental details
2.1. Preparation of CePO4 nanostructures
Tripolyphosphoric acid solution (0.035 mol1, H5P3O10) was obtained by using a
cation exchange resin (Dowex 50W X4 100-200 mesh) for conversion of sodium tripolyphosphate, Na5P3O105H2O (purum p.a., P98.0% (T), SigmaAldrich).
CePO4 nanostructures were synthesized by mixing Ce(NO3)36H2O (0.10 mol)
(SigmaAldrich, 99% trace metals basis) and H5P3O10 (0.10 mol). The microwave
reaction was performed in a microwave oven (CEM-MARS, frequency 2.45 GHz,
power of 200 W). The synthesis process was as follows: 50 ml of Ce(NO3)36H2O
The structure of the CePO4 nanoparticles was determined by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) with a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer equipped with a Lynxeye
detector and Cu Ka radiation (k = 1.5405 ) at 35 kV and 25 mA. Data were collected
at room temperature in the 2h range of 1570, step size of 0.016 and step time of
0.5 s. To evaluate the effects of the reaction parameters and sintering temperature
on the structural and vibrational properties of CePO4, Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy (FTIR) was carried out. The spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer
spectrometer using KBr pellets, 4 cm1 of resolution setting and range of 1300
450 cm1. The samples were scanned 40 times. Scanning electron microscopy
was used to evaluate morphological changes in the CePO4 nanopowders using a
JEOL JSM-6300 apparatus (20 kV), whereas transmission electron microscopy was
used to corroborate the structure and phase composition of the samples by using
a JEOL-2000 FX-II working at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV. The analysis of
the average particle size and size distribution were determined by dynamic light
scattering, using deionized water as dispersant medium in a Malver Zetasizer Nano
ZSP, model ZEN5600. The particle size of the dispersions was described by the
cumulants mean diameter, and the size distribution was described by the polydispersity index and the size distribution plot. The optical properties of the samples
were followed by ultravioletvisible diffuse reectance spectroscopy (UVVis DR)
using a 110-mm-diameter-integrating-sphere accessory mounted on a Cary 5000
(b)
(a)
Monoclinic Hexagonal
Tr180t30Ts600
Tr180Ct30min
Tr130t30Ts600
(321)
30
40
50
60
70
20
30
50
60
Tr130t30Ts600pH11
(d)
Tr180t30Ts600pH11
Tr130 t30Ts0pH11
Tr180t30Ts0pH11
60
20
30
40
(033)
(402)
(233)
(041)
(212)
(320)
(023)
(040)
(031)
(221)
Tr180t30Ts600pH1
(012)
(202)
(212)
(101)
(101)
(011)
(402)
(321)
70
(311)
(121)
Hexagonal
Monoclinic
(020)
(200)
(120)
(142)
(231)
(132)
(033)
(321)
(103)
50
2 (degrees)
Tr180t30Ts600pH5
Tr180t30Ts0pH5
Tr130t30Ts0pH1
(003)
(301)
(212)
(113)
(220)
(302)
(310)
(311)
(213)
(104)
(222)
(312)
(041)
(114)
(112)
(210)
(022)
(211)
(111)
(200)
(120)
(012)
(012)
(110)
(200)
(202)
(212)
(210)
(022)
(031)
(311)
40
Tr130t30Ts600 pH1
Tr180t30Ts0pH9
(211)
(112)
Tr130t30Ts600pH5
Intensity (a.u.)
Tr130t30Ts0pH9
(214)
(402)
(121)
Tr180t30Ts600pH9
Tr130t30Ts0pH5
(101)
Intensity (a.u.)
Tr130t30Ts600pH9
30
70
2 (degrees)
(c)
20
Tr130t15Ts400
(321)
(103)
(212)
(200)
(302)
(310)
(104)
40
2 (degrees)
Hexagonal
Monoclinic
(004)
(142)
(241)
(031)
(311)
(212)
(103)
(023)
(132)
(140)
(020)
(200)
(120)
(012)
(202)
(212)
(011)
(111)
Tr130t30Ts400
Tr180t15Ts400
Tr130Ct15min
20
Tr130t15Ts600
Tr180t30Ts400
(101)
(303)
(104)
(301)
(212)
(220)
(302)
(310)
(112)
(211)
(003)
(110)
(200)
(102)
Rhabdophane (hexagonal)
(112)
(211)
Tr130Ct 30min
Intensity (a.u.)
Tr180Ct15min
(101)
Intensity (a.u.)
Tr180t15Ts600
50
Tr180t30Ts0pH1
60
70
2 (degrees)
Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) non-sintered CePO4 powders obtained under the stated conditions, (b) CePO4 nanoparticles sintered at two different temperatures
(400 and 600 C), (c) samples synthesized under experiment 7 conditions at different solution pH values and (d) samples synthesized under experiment 8 conditions at
different solution pH values.
Please cite this article in press as: D. Palma-Ramrez et al., J. Alloys Comp. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053
Ts400
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
16
14
17
16
16
14
17
15
15
15
17
19
21
20
16
20
or 600C
Ts0 (nm)
Ts400
52 (pH 1)
11 (pH 5)
15 (pH 9)
16 (pH 11)
29 (pH 1)
8 (pH 5)
13 (pH 9)
10 (pH 11)
15
11
14
17
18
12
14
10
or 600C
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
Table 4
Particle z-average diameter (Dz), polydispersity index (PDI), the highest mean number
(%) and their sizes of CePO4 nanopowders.
Condition
Dz (nm)
PDI
The highest
mean number (%)
Size (nm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
529.2
541.3
445.3
533.4
315
396
pH 1 (335.4)
pH 3 (497.7)
pH 5 (270.8)
pH 9 (228.1)
pH 11 (214.4)
pH 1 (370.7)
pH 3 (513.9)
pH 5 (295.7)
pH 9 (266)
pH 11 (201.3)
1.16
1.1
1.12
1.13
1.1
1.11
pH 1 (1.82)
pH 3 (1.16)
pH 5 (1.39)
pH 9 (1.31)
pH 11 (1.48)
pH 1 (1.35)
pH 3 (1.14)
pH 5 (1.19)
pH 9 (1.06)
pH 11 (1.27)
26
31
28
24
31
27
14
24
18
21
21
19
24
27
56
22
396
459
342
459
255
342
122 (pH 1)
396 (pH 3)
141 (pH 5)
122 (pH 9)
91 (pH 11)
190 (pH 1)
255 (pH 3)
190 (pH 5)
14 (pH 9)
122 (pH 11)
(nm)
1)
5)
9)
11)
1)
5)
9)
11)
spectrophotometer. Samples were scanned with an average time of 0.1 s, scan rate
of 600 nm/min and data intervals of 1 nm within the 700200 nm range. The background reectance of polytetrauoroethylene (PTFE) was measured before. The
Kubelka Munk function F(R1) was applied to convert the diffuse reectance spectra
into the equivalent absorption spectra and determine the optical band gap from the
slope of the linear part in the (F(R1)hv)2 vs. hv plot (photon energy).
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
(pH
1)
3)
5)
9)
11)
1)
3)
5)
9)
11)
Table 3
Crystal size of CePO4 and treatment of linear plots to obtain the size of crystallites by Scherrer modied formula.
Condition
As-prepared eln
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
e4:4404 0.0117
e4:5628 0.0104
e4:6342 0.0097
e4:58 0.0102
e4:4404 0.0117
e4:5628 0.0104
e4:6342 0.0097
e4:58 0.0102
e5:955 0.0025
e4:5992 0.0010
e4:8082 0.0081
e4:8469 0.0078
e5:70206 0.0033
e4:5758 0.0102
e4:70319 0.0090
e4:51318 0.0109
at pH 3
at pH 3
at pH 3
at pH 3
at pH 3
at pH 3
at pH 3
at pH 3
(pH 1)
(pH 5)
(pH 9)
(pH 11)
(pH 1)
(pH 5)
(pH 9)
(pH 11)
Kk=L
0:94x0:154051
L
L (nm)
Sintered eln
12
14
15
14
12
14
15
14
56
14
18
18
43
14
16
13
e4:581 0.0102
e4:5222 0.0108
e4:63076 0.0097
e4:6 0.0100
e4:825 0.0080
e4:938 0.0071
e4:851 0.0078
e4:824 0.0080
e4:22391 0.00146
e2:9174 0.0540
e4:7569 0.0085
e4:9299 0.0072
e4:6425 0.0096
e2:9742 0.0510
e4:9476 0.0071
e4:5768 0.0102
Kk=L
0:94x0:154051
L
L (nm)
14
13
15
14
18
20
19
18
10
3
17
20
15
3
20
14
Please cite this article in press as: D. Palma-Ramrez et al., J. Alloys Comp. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053
(a)
( 1) h (100)
(2) m (101)
50 nm
(3) m (020)
(4) m (002)
(5) h (012)
20 nm
(6) m (
( 1) h (100)
(b)
(2) h (101)
100nm
(3) m (
(4) m (
(5) h (112)
(6) h (
20 nm
(7) m (310)
(1) m (011)
(c)
(2) m (020)
100nm
(3) m (
(4) m (
(5) m (013)
20 nm
(6) m (
(7) m (
(1) m (201)
(d)
(2) m (002)
100nm
(3) m (
(4) m (131)
(5) m (301)
(6) m (310)
50 nm
(7) m (
Fig. 2. Selected TEM micrographs and SAED patterns of CePO4 nanopowders synthesized under different experimental conditions: (a) Tr130t15Ts400, (b) Tr130t30Ts400, (c)
Tr180t15Ts600 and (d) Tr180t30Ts600. In the gure, m and h represent the monoclinic and hexagonal phases, respectively.
Please cite this article in press as: D. Palma-Ramrez et al., J. Alloys Comp. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053
Experiment 7 (Tr130,t30,Ts600)
(a)
(c)
(b)
pH= 1
100 nm
pH= 5
100 nm
(d)
pH= 9
100 nm
pH= 11
100 nm
Experiment 8 (Tr180,t30,Ts600)
(e)
(f)
pH= 1
100 nm
pH= 5
(h)
(g)
100 nm
pH= 9
100 nm
pH= 11
Fig. 3. SEM micrographs of CePO4 nanopowders obtained under the conditions of experiments: (ad) 7 and (eh) 8.
Table 5
Band gap of CePO4 nanopowders calculated from the KubelkaMunk modied
spectra.
Experiment (pH 3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3.0
3.07
3.0
3.07
3.06
3.1
3.02
3.07
pH
pH
pH
pH
pH
pH
pH
pH
Kk
Kk 1
L cos h
L cos h
Kk
Kk
1
ln b ln
ln
ln
L cos h
L
cos h
1
5
9
11
1
5
9
11
3.22
3.04
3.25
3.25
3.15
3.25
3.08
3.23
Kk
b cos h
obtain the average L value through all the peaks (or some selected
peaks), the mathematical errors in the calculation must be reduced
by using the least square method to obtain the following equations:
2
3
eln L
Kk
L
For the calculations, the K value was considered to vary from 0.90,
for semispherical nanoparticles, to 0.94 for nanorod [16] structure
and the results from both set of experiments have been summarized in Tables 2 and 3.
The rst set of experiments displays crystal sizes around 14
21 nm, which indicates that the sintering temperature exerts no
great inuence on the crystallite size, while a similar trend was
obtained during the second stage. Under the conditions of experiments 7 or 8 at pH values of 5, 9 and 11, the CePO4 nanopowders
present values in the 816 nm and 1017 nm ranges at room temperature and 600 C, respectively. On the other hand, the CePO4
nanopowders obtained at pH = 1 in both experiments displayed
the largest crystallite sizes (52 and 29 nm) with an important
reduction after the sintering process (29 and 18 nm). In the analyses, it was assumed that the particle shapes were spherical, however, it has been reported that CePO4 can have either a rod or
spherical morphology [8]. Thus, the crystal size change after the
sintering process could be due to the transformation from rods into
spherical particles, which could be related to the smaller amount of
rods present in the sample, and therefore, the broadening of the
diffraction peaks due to the formation of smaller clusters is
observed [17].
As it can be seen in Table 3, strong associations were found
between the crystal size obtained by Scherrer and Scherrer modied equations. The rst and second sets of experiments reveal
crystal sizes between 1220 nm and 1318 nm, respectively. By
comparing the results obtained from Scherrer equation, it is conrmed that the behavior of the crystal size shows no big differences among the reaction temperature, sintering temperature
Please cite this article in press as: D. Palma-Ramrez et al., J. Alloys Comp. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053
(a)
(b)
pH 11
20
Tr180t15Ts600
20
Number (%)
Number (%)
30
25
Tr130t30Ts400
Tr130t30Ts600
Tr180t30Ts400
Tr130t15Ts600
Tr180t15Ts400
10
pH 9
Tr130t30Ts600
pH 5
15
10
pH 1
5
Tr130t15Ts400
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
(c)
Tr180t30Ts600
Number (%)
30
pH 11
20
pH 5
pH 9
pH 1
10
0
0
Rni Di
Rni
Rni D4i
Dw
Rni D3i
Dn
Dz
5
6
Rni D6i
Rni D5i
Dw
Dn
PDI
Please cite this article in press as: D. Palma-Ramrez et al., J. Alloys Comp. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053
Transmittance (%)
r130
15
s400
955
564
578
1140-983
r130
30
r180
30
s400
538
800
-1
600
1400
1200
15
r130
30
T
s600
564
s600
r180
r180
1000
30
600
s600
537
1069
-1
s600
1091
800
15
616
955
995
Wavenumber (cm )
564
1069 1016
1200
600
578
955
1400
800
-1
537
616
1091
1000
Wavenumber (cm )
578
T
618
1140-983
1000
564
578
Transmittance (%)
Transmittance (%)
r130
s400
955
Wavenumber (cm )
T
618
s400
1200
(b)
15
1140-983
1140-983
1400
955
541
955
r180
Transmittance (%)
(a)
1400
1200
995
1016
1000
800
600
-1
Wavenumber (cm )
Fig. 5. FT-IR spectra of CePO4 nanopowders sintered at: (a) 400 C and (b) 600 C, under the conditions of the rst set of experiments.
Please cite this article in press as: D. Palma-Ramrez et al., J. Alloys Comp. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053
OH-
CePO4
PO 4
Ce
H+
CePO4 complex H+
Nucleation
Faster ionic motion
(a)
100
130C, 15 min
8
5
80
180C 30 min
7,4
180C, 15 min
60
1,3
2
130C 30 min
Diffuse reflectance (%)
40
20
0
20
68
5
15
7
10
180C 30 m in
180C, 15 m in
4
130C 30 m in
2 1
3
0
200
H4 P2 O7 H2 O ! 2H3 PO4
220
240
260
280
300
(nm)
7(pH 1)
8(pH 1)
8(pH 9)
40
7(pH 9)
20
7(pH 11)
0
200
7(pH 5)
8(pH 5)
60
8(pH 11)
300
400
500
(nm )
25
20
15
10
5
7 (p H 1 )
7 (p H 9 )
8 (p H 9 )
8 (p H 5 )
7 (p H 9 )
8 (p H 1 )
8 (p H 1 1 )
7 (p H 1 1 )
200
220
240
260
(n m )
600
11
On the other hand, the main reaction might take place according to
Eqs. (12)(14). The precipitates of the Ce3+PO3
4 complex were more
evident when the pH of the initial solution was adjusted in alkaline
medium. This precipitate leads to a lower concentration of Ce3+ and
HnPO3
4 , decreasing the chemical potential, and the OH ions from
NH4OH are absorbed on the crystal face, altering the growth of
the nanorods to form spherical particles belonging to the monoclinic system as it is also shown in Fig. 6.
(b)
80
9
10
200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700
(nm)
100
280
300
700
Fig. 7. Diffuse reectance spectra obtained for all the as-prepared powders, before
and after the sintering process.
12
H4 P2 O7 H2 O ! 2H3 PO4
13
14
Please cite this article in press as: D. Palma-Ramrez et al., J. Alloys Comp. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053
Tr130t15Ts600
Tr130 t30Ts600
pH 3
253
300
(F(R)hv) 2
225
(F(R)hv) 2
(F(R)hv) 2
(F(R)hv) 2
pH 1
257 273
200
(nm)
240
215
220
240
3.22 eV
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.5
4.0
1.0
1.5
2.0
273
240
220
240
260
280
(nm)
(F(R)hv) 2
(F(R)hv) 2
pH 5
(F(R)hv) 2
(F(R)hv) 2
Tr130t30Ts600
pH 3
200
1.5
2.0
300
224
3.04 eV
3.0
3.5
4.0
1.0
1.5
2.0
257 273
240
215
280
200
300
220
2.5
3.5
4.0
240
260 280
(nm)
300
3.25 eV
3.23 eV
2.0
3.0
(F(R)hv) 2
(F(R)hv) 2
(F(R)hv) 2
pH 11
(F(R)hv) 2
Tr130t30Ts600
2.5
hv (eV)
Tr180t30Ts600
1.5
4.0
pH 9
1.0
3.5
(nm)
2.5
(nm)
3.0
266 281
hv (eV)
200
2.5
250
3.0 eV
1.0
300
hv (eV)
Tr130t15Ts400
215
280
3.06 eV
3.0
hv (eV)
257
260
(nm)
3.0
3.5
4.0
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
hv (eV)
hv (eV)
Fig. 8. KubelkaMunk modied spectra and its equivalence in hm vs k (inset) of selected CePO4 samples.
F R1
1 R1 2 Kk
sk
2R1
15
Please cite this article in press as: D. Palma-Ramrez et al., J. Alloys Comp. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053
10
[3] L. Ma, W.-X. Chen, Y.-F. Zheng, Z.-D. Xu, Hydrothermal growth and morphology
evolution of CePO4 aggregates by a complexing method, Mater. Res. Bull. 43
(2008) 28402849.
[4] P. Xu, R. Yu, L. Zong, J. Wang, D. Wang, J. Deng, J. Chen, X. Xing, Phase evolution
and photoluminescence enhancement of CePO4 nanowires from a low
phosphate concentration system, J. Nanoparticle Res. C7-1622 15 (2013) 18.
[5] I. Bilecka, M. Niederberger, Microwave chemistry for inorganic nanomaterials
synthesis, Nanoscale 2 (2010) 13581374.
[6] N. Ekthammathat, T. Thongtem, A. Phuruangrat, S. Thongtem, Microwaveassisted synthesis of CePO4 nanorod phosphor with violet emission, Rare Met.
30 (2011) 572576.
[7] C.R. Patra, G. Alexandra, S. Patra, D.S. Jacob, A. Gedanken, A. Landau, Y. Gofer,
Microwave approach for the synthesis of rhabdophane-type lanthanide
orthophosphate (Ln = La, Ce, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd and Tb) nanorods under
solvothermal conditions, New J. Chem. 29 (2005) 733739.
[8] L. Karpowich, S. Wilcke, R. Yu, G. Harley, J.A. Reimer, L.C. De Jonghe, Synthesis
and characterization of mixed-morphology CePO4 nanoparticles, J. Solid State
Chem. 180 (2007) 840846.
[9] L. Macalik, P.E. Tomaszewski, A. Matraszek, I. Szczygiel, P. Solarz, P. Godlewska,
M. Sobczyk, J. Hanuza, Optical and structural characterisation of pure and Pr3+
doped LaPO4 and CePO4 nanocrystals, J. Alloys Comp. 509 (2011) 74587465.
[10] N. Clavier, R. Podor, N. Dacheux, Crystal chemistry of the monazite structure, J.
Eur. Ceram. Soc. 31 (2011) 941976.
[11] S. Lucas, E. Champion, D. Bregiroux, D. Bernache-Assollant, F. Audubert, Rare
earth phosphate powders RePO4nH2O (Re = La, Ce or Y) Part I. Synthesis and
characterization, J. Solid State Chem. 177 (2004) 13021311.
[12] N. Ekthammathat, T. Thongtem, A. Phuruangrat, S. Thongtem, Microwaveassisted synthesis and characterisation of uniform LaPO4 nanorods, J. Exp.
Nanosci. 7 (2012) 616623.
[13] H. Hejase, S.S. Hayek, S. Qadri, Y. Haik, MnZnFe nanoparticles for selfcontrolled magnetic hyperthermia, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324 (2012) 3620
3628.
[14] J.I. Langford, A.J.C. Wilson, Scherrer after sixty years: a survey and some new
results in the determination of crystallite size, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 11 (1978)
102113.
[15] A. Monshi, M.R. Foroughi, M.R. Monshi, Modied Scherrer equation to estimate
more accurately nano-crystallite size using XRD, World J. Nano Sci. Eng. 2
(2012) 154160.
[16] P.S. Nair, T. Radhakrishnan, N. Revaprasadu, G.A. Kolawole, P. OBrien, A singlesource route to CdS nanorods, Chem. Commun. (2002) 564565
[17] A. Gaber, M.A. Abdel- Rahim, A.Y. Abdel-Latief, M.N. Abdel-Salam, Inuence of
calcination temperature on the structure and porosity of nanocrystalline SnO2
synthesized by a conventional precipitation method, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 9
(2014) 8195.
[18] D. Zhang, X. Du, L. Shi, R. Gao, Shape-controlled synthesis and catalytic
application of ceria nanomaterials, Dalton Trans. 41 (2012) 1445514475.
[19] T. Masui, H. Tategaki, S. Furukawa, N. Imanaka, Synthesis and characterization
of new environmentallyfriendly pigments based on cerium phosphate, J.
Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 112 (2004) 646649.
[20] P. Pusztai, T. Simon, . Kukovecz, Z. Knya, Structural stability test of
hexagonal CePO4 nanowires synthesized at ambient temperature, J. Mol.
Struct. 1044 (2013) 9498.
[21] Q. Yuan, H.-H. Duan, L.-L. Li, L.-D. Sun, Y.-W. Zhang, C.-H. Yan, Controlled
synthesis and assembly of ceria-based nanomaterials, J. Colloid Interface Sci.
335 (2009) 151167.
[22] W. Wang, J.Y. Howe, Y. Li, X. Qiu, D.C. Joy, M.P. Paranthaman, M.J. Doktycz, B.
Gu, A surfactant and template-free route for synthesizing ceria nanocrystals
with tunable morphologies, J. Mater. Chem. 20 (2010) 77767781.
[23] Y. Zhang, H. Guan, The growth of lanthanum phosphate (rhabdophane)
nanobers via the hydrothermal method, Mater. Res. Bull. 40 (2005) 1536
1543.
[24] R. Lpez, R. Gmez, Band-gap energy estimation from diffuse reectance
measurements on solgel and commercial TiO2: a comparative study, J. Sol
Gel Sci. Technol. 61 (2011) 17.
[25] Y.-Q. Li, S.-Y. Fu, Y.-W. Mai, Preparation and characterization of transparent
ZnO/epoxy nanocomposites with high-UV shielding efciency, Polymer 47
(2006) 21272132.
[26] A.L. Andrady, H. Hamid, A. Torikai, Effects of solar UV and climate change on
materials, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 10 (2011) 292300.
[27] S. Dhara, P.K. Giri, Enhanced UV photosensitivity from rapid thermal annealed
vertically aligned ZnO nanowires, Nanoscale Res. Lett. C7-504 6 (2011) 18.
[28] A. Chithambararaj, A.C. Bose, Hydrothermal synthesis of hexagonal and
orthorhombic MoO3 nanoparticles, J. Alloys Comp. 509 (2011) 81058110.
[29] A.B. Murphy, Band-gap determination from diffuse reectance measurements
of semiconductor lms, and application to photoelectrochemical watersplitting, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 91 (2007) 13261337.
[30] Y.-P. Fang, A.-W. Xu, R.-Q. Song, H.-X. Zhang, L.-P. You, J.C. Yu, H.-Q. Liu,
Systematic synthesis and characterization of single-crystal lanthanide
orthophosphate nanowires, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 1602516034.
Please cite this article in press as: D. Palma-Ramrez et al., J. Alloys Comp. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053