Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact by Ludwik Fleck; Thaddeus J. Trenn; Robert K.
Merton; Fred Bradley
Review by: Barbara Gutmann Rosenkrantz
Isis, Vol. 72, No. 1 (Mar., 1981), pp. 96-99
Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/231186 .
Accessed: 08/05/2014 18:41
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The University of Chicago Press and The History of Science Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Isis.
http://www.jstor.org
96
ESSAY REVIEWS-ISIS,
Ref lecktions
Ludwik Fleck. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Edited by Thaddeus J. Trenn and Robert K. Merton, translated by Fred Bradley and Thaddeus
J. Trenn, foreword by Thomas S. Kuhn. xxviii + 203 pp., 5 illus., bibl., index.
Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, 1979. $17.50.
Just as the publication of a cherished manuscript evokes the pangs and joys of
birth, translating the text into another language and editing it for republication
releases some of the fervor characteristic of the "born again." So this English
language edition of Ludwik Fleck's Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einfuhrung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv
(1935) now appears with a full complement of distinguished admirers heralding
the event. The monograph deserves attention both because of intrinsic interest
and because of its fate.
Although the editors of this publication describe the author as "an unusual
man, a humanist with an encyclopedic knowledge" (p. 149), he may be more
significant as a representative man. Ludwik Fleck was a Jew born in the city of
Lemberg or Lvov, where Austrian and Pole contested intellectual and political
sovereignty until 1918 and German remained the language of most educated
people. After completing a medical education at the University of Lvov in 1922,
Fleck began work as a clinical bacteriologist. In the formal sense his work was
unremarkable: for most of his life he labored in a public health laboratory. Yet
the reality of this work is better conveyed when we know that Fleck worked in
Lvov between the two wars, in the concentration camps of Auschwitz and
Buchenwald after Nazi occupation replaced Soviet troops, in Lublin and
Warsaw after the war, and finally in Israel, where he died in 1961 just before his
sixty-fifth birthday.
The book was written during one of the rare periods in Fleck's life when he
was free to reflect on the characteristics of scientific work and knowledge that
interested him deeply. It is probably impossible for us to comprehend the
limitations to this freedom. The manuscript was completed in 1934, when Fleck
was director of the bacteriology laboratory of the Social Sick Fund (Kasa
Chorych) of Lvov. The book was published the next year in Switzerland because
"political conditions . . . did not permit a Jew to publish in Germany" (p. 150),
and in the same year Fleck was fired from his job because a government agency
in Poland would not retain a Jew in a position of visible authority. The monograph affords a glimpse of the intellectual fortitude and creativity that resisted
extinction under these threatening circumstances, which were merely a preview
of the next decade.
Fleck examines the relationship between thought and experience in the
construction of scientific facts in order to clarify the origins and development of
scientific knowledge. He turns to a subject for which both common knowledge
and his expert knowledge permit him to use analogy and inference effectively:
the successive reformulations of the concept of syphilis over five hundred years,
during which socially and medically accepted criteria for diagnosis of venereal
disease interacted. Structurally his study is twofold, for historical accounts
alternate throughout with interpretations drawn from philosophy, sociology,
and psychology. Thus the first chapter, on the origins of the modern concept of
syphilis from the fifteenth through the nineteenth centuries, is followed by a
chapter of "epistemological conclusions"; and the third chapter, which begins
with a lucid rendition of "the rite of initiation into the field of the Wasserman
reaction according to the German ritual" (p. 54) and treats the emergence of
B. G. ROSENKRANTZ
97
ON SCIENTIFIC FACT
After
all, conceptions
. .
. Analogously
to
social structures, every age has its own dominant conceptions as well as remnants of past ones and rudiments of those of the future" (pp. 27-28). In other
instances Fleck uses examples from the history of science and social anthro'For a commanding interpretation of this position, see Paul Forman, "Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory, 1918-1927: Adaptation by German Physicists and Mathematicians to a
Hostile Intellectual Environment," Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 1971, 3:1-115. My
thanks to Dr. Forman also for calling my attention to Fleck's "Zur Krise der 'Wirklichkeit,"'
Naturwissenschaften, June 1929, 17:425-430. My colleague Gerald Holton helped me to appreciate further the tenor and orchestration of this article, and made the sensible suggestion that
regular acquaintance with the journal kept Fleck in touch with intellectual currents despite his
geographic and professional isolation.
98
ESSAY REVIEWS-ISIS,
99
fully account for the personal resources he summoned to resolve the conflict
between "objectivity" and "subjectivity" in observation, of "active" and "passive" elements in experiment.
In most respects Fleck is an unlikely intellectual companion to Planck, Bohr,
Schrodinger, and other physicists and mathematicians who felt compelled to
reexamine the relationship between their science and lebensphilosophie in the
1920s and 1930s. Yet Fleck was most likely directly influenced by their publications and plagued by the same intellectual and social dilemmas. A more precise
exploration of Fleck's connections than provided in the biographical notes
would no doubt be difficult. Attempting to understand what appear as unexplained gaps in these connections is even harder; presumably Fleck was ignorant
of Kyklos, the journal published by Henry Sigerist and his colleagues at the
Institute for the History of Medicine at Leipzig from 1929 to 1932, although he
does refer to Sigerist's predecessor Karl Sudhoff. Fleck turned instead to
the journal Naturwissenschaften for inspiration and to find his voice. Thus he
may be best understood as a rather distant relative to the Weimar physicists
Paul Forman writes of, one of those biologists "who could most easily adapt
his ideology and values" to the "hostile" intellectual environment.2 Fleck's
intellectual and social isolation blurred the connections, but it is in the pages of
Naturwissenschaften that he expressed his own sentiments most directly. His
short paper "Zur Krise der 'Wirklichkeit"' is in many respects more pithy and
pointed than the later book. Published in 1929, just after Fleck spent a year of
study in Vienna, its enthusiastic outlook is unmistakable. Science is the source
of our understanding about the natural world, and also the reflection of the
social and cultural world men have created. He closes the paper with several
flourishes as witness to his optimism: "Wozu plumpe Metaphysik, wenn die
Physik von Morgen jede Phantasie uberflugeln wird?"
BARBARA GUTMANN ROSENKRANTZ
Fair enough?
Jonathan R. Cole. Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community. xv +
336 pp., tables, bibl., index. New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan, 1979. $17.95.
Lilli S. Hornig (Chairperson, Committee on the Education and Employment of
Women in Science and Engineering). Climbing the Academic Ladder: Doctoral
Women Scientists in Academe. A Report to the Office of Science and Technology
Policy. xv + 155 pp., tables, bibl., apps. Washington, D.C.: National Academy
of Sciences, 1979. $8.
When the history of women scientists of the 1970s comes to be written, these
two publications will merit some notice, not only because of the data they
present (some dating from the 1950s) and their interpretations of it, but because
of the public reaction to their work-for both books are deliberately "political"
documents, designed to provoke discussion and action. Perhaps that is why both