Cross-Examination of the 1N

-Let's go to our observations:

Observation 1:
Did you deny that nuclear weapons can have a devastating impact on the US, if one were to be
detonated here?
So the Negative team in this round is not going to deny the threat posed by nuclear-weapons, just who
solves the threat better right?
Mutual Destruction:
Did mutual destruction deter 9/11?
Would you agree that mutual destruction does not deter terrorists?
Have terrorists states or rogue states ever possessed a nuclear weapon history (ask for a specific
country and a specific time)?
Has mutual destruction prevented rogue states from trying to acquire nuclear weapons?
Iran:
Israel could wipe Iran of the face of the earth, and Iran knows that, but they're still getting a nuke,
correct? (if they admit this argue it)
So mutual destruction hasn't worked in the Status Quo has it?
NK:
North Korea knows the world hates them, but that hasn't stopped them from continuing their missile
program, correct?
Iran = no threat:
So you're saying that Iran is not pursuing a nuke?
Is Iran (not) run by terrorists?
Are terrorists (not) suicidal? Then logic would tell us that Iran is suicidal, right? That's how
conditionals work.
EPAA really effective
So your contention is that EPAA is really effective right?

Do you know when EPAA is going to be fully completed?

Does EPAA have a long-range missile-defense yet?
Are you aware that EPAA isn't going to be completed for 10 years?
Do you think America's security can be confiscated for 10 years?
But you would have only Obama's system rather both Bush's system and Obama's system, correct?
Also, Obama said: after the election I'll have more flexibility on missile-defense, correct?
So you would like to put all your faith into one system, basically you want to put all your eggs in one
basket, correct?
Missile-defense Ineffective in General
We cited experts that say missile-defense works, you of course cited evidence that missile-defense
doesn't work, so what makes your experts more credible in your opinion?
What does your evidence say makes our missile-defense ineffective?
Is your evidence talking about Obama's missile-defense system EPAA or Bush's missile-defense
system?
If Obama's plan is ineffective doesn't that just mean that we need Bush's missile-defense all the more?
Nukes only used once
Have terrorist states or rogue states ever possessed a nuclear weapon in history? (ask them to name a
specific country)
Also, just because they've been used once, doesn't mean they cannot be used again correct?
Cost DA/ Funding
Would you agree that human life is more important than money?
Money = more important than life is essentially what you're arguing correct?
If a nuclear weapon explodes in (name this city, state) is that devastating?
Yeah there's a deficit, but we still exist, right?
How much $ is an entire cities lives worth?
Solvency

Poland + NATO agreed to host Obama's system, correct?

Are you aware that when Obama scrapped Bush's system in the Czech republic the Czech's where
angered by that?
Life Impact/ Setting up the Kritik
Are you okay with mass human casualties?
Do you believe abortion should be legal in this country?
Was Hitler an evil?
And yet you think it's okay to let a major city in the US get blown up by a nuclear bomb?
Russia DA
Would you agree that lives are more important than US-Russia relations?
Would you agree that Russia has a tendency to bluff at times?
Does Russia like us?
Has Russia ever liked us?
What's more important, protection from a nuclear bomb, or better relations with a country that has
never even liked us?
Enders
Thank you I am done asking questions because I refuse to ask questions to someone who thinks human
life is so invaluable.
Combacks in CX:
Mutual Destruction detters me from ansering your question, because obviously in your world anything
is dettered by mutual destruction.