Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Intermediate
April 2010
Volume 4, Issue 6
RTI and Differentiated Instruction
Inside this issue:
Go Hand-in-Hand
RTI and DI Go Hand- 1
Response to Intervention integrates assessment and interven- in-Hand
tion within a multi-level prevention system to maximize student
achievement and to reduce behavior problems. With RTI, schools
identify students at risk for poor learning outcomes, monitor stu-
dent progress, provide evidence-based interventions and adjust the Proactive Planning 2
Differentiated Seating
intensity and nature of those interventions depending on a student’s
Arrangement
responsiveness, and identify students with learning disabilities or
other disabilities. http://www.rti4success.org/ Differentiated Ap- 3
pointment Partners
Differentiated Instruction is a way to plan/deliver the curricu-
lum in Tier 1 of RTI’s multi-level prevention system. In the first tier,
teachers should be using research-based, differentiated instruction Anchor Activities 4
to meet the needs of 80-90 percent of their learners. Differentiated
Instruction includes [but is not limited to] assessment, learning
profiles, multiple intelligences, cooperative learning, tiered instruc-
tion and flexible grouping. It’s consistently and proactively creating April, already?
different pathways to help all students become successful.
Where has the
year gone?
Proactive Planning
A Differentiated Seating Arrangement
In the seating arrangement above, students are in groups of four. The Early Readiness [ER] learners
are seated next to Readiness [R] learners. The Advanced Readiness [AR] learners are seated next to
Readiness [R] learners. When the teacher asks shoulder partners to work together, the students are
seated with peer tutoring in mind. When the teacher asks face partners to work together, the students
are also seated with peer tutoring in mind. In this seating arrangement, the Advanced Readiness
[accelerated] students are not face partners or shoulder partners with the Early Readiness [struggling]
students. Students are also numbered from 1-4. Notice that all the 1s are Early Readiness, all the 2s are
Readiness, all the 3s are Readiness and all the 4s are Advanced Readiness. When the teacher calls for
numbers to meet, he/she knows that the number 1s will need more teacher direction than the 3s.
Considerations:
When you change seating arrangements, rotate the readiness levels so students don’t associate
Number 1s with Early Readiness.
Readiness levels vary subject to subject. You may want to base the seating chart on reading readi-
ness levels and use appointment calendars [a.k.a. clock partners] for math.
If you prefer a two-by-two seating arrangement, students can all be facing forward. In seconds, they
can push their desks together or pull them apart to form a group of four.
Considerations:
*Students should not be made aware of how ap-
pointments are labeled; they simply need to know
who their partners are. Their appointments have
names; the teacher’s appointments have ‘codes’
like the ones to the left.
*Gradually add partners and your appointment
calendars will last for months.
*A secondary teacher told me she imported her
appointments into Excel Spreadsheets to elimi-
nate students ‘losing’ their appointments.
Think-Tac-Toe:
http://www.rcs.k12.tn.us/rc/instruction/ttt/ttt.htm
http://www.rcs.k12.tn.us/rc/instruction/ttt/think_tac_toe_writing.pdf
http://www.eht.k12.nj.us/~Jonesj/Differentiated%20Instruction/Tic-Tac-Toe.htm
Cubing:
http://www.eht.k12.nj.us/~Jonesj/Differentiated%20Instruction/Cubing.htm
http://www.eht.k12.nj.us/~Jonesj/Differentiated%20Instruction/cube%20to%
20make.htm
http://curry.edschool.virginia.edu/files/nagc_cubing__think_dots.pdf