Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
kmol/hr
= 6.540E+05
kg/ hr
kmol/hr
= 1.95E+04
kg/ hr
kmol/hr
= 7.298E+05
kg/ hr
kmol/hr
= 2.18E+04
kg/ hr
kg/ m3
kg/ m3
N/m
kg/ m3
kg/ m3
N/m
Appendix F - 53
[ s / 0.02 ] 0.2
(top column)
1/2
= K1,c (top column) [ ( rL - rv ) / rv]
= 1.6635
m/s
m/ s
m/ s
m3/ s
Vm
3600 rv
= 2.2322
m3/ s
Appendix F - 54
= 1.4241
m2
= Vmax (bottom column)
Uf (bottom column)
= 2.2322
1.2083
= 1.8473
m2
m2
m2
Column diameter
Dc (top column) = [ (Ac (top column) 4) / p ]1/2
= 1.4353
m
Dc (bottom column) = [ (Ac (bottom column) 4) / p ]1/2
= 1.6348
m
Take the larger diameter as a final diameter for further design procedure, so
Dc = 1.6348
m
Appendix F - 55
= 0.2417
m3/ s
Lmaxm3/ s
Therefore,
The selected recommended liquid flow pattern is single pass tray
(d) Provisional Plate Design
Column diameter, Dc = 1.6348
m2
Ad (at 12%)
= 0.2519
Net area, An = Ac - Ad
m2
= 1.8473
Active area, Aa = Ac - 2Ad
= 1.5954
Take 10% as first trial :
Hole area, Ah = 10% Aa
= 0.1595
m2
m2
m2
mm
m
mm
mm
(stainless steel)
Appendix F - 56
kg / hr
kg /s
m/s
m/s
Appendix F - 57
= 2.2322
0.1595
= 13.9909
m/s
mm liquid
mm
m
Back-up downcomer, hb
m2
2
= 166[ Lmax / (rL x Am) ]
= 0.010
mm
= 0.000010
m
= hw + how + ht + hdc
= 112.32
mm
= 0.1123
m
Since
0.1123 < 1/2 ( plate spacing + weir height )
0.1123 < #VALUE!
So, tray spacing is acceptable
Appendix F - 58
AdhbrL
Lmax
= 0.1171
s
(since tr > 3s, the retention time is satisfied)
= 0.0020
min
(h) Check Entrainment
Actual percentage flooding for design area :
Uv = Maximum volumetric flowrate, Vmax
An
= 2.2322
1.8473
= 1.2083
m/ s
% flooding = (Uv / Uf) 100
= 1.2083
100
1.4140
= 85.45
%
Chemical Engineering Volume 6 Second Edition (R.K. Sinnott, 1996)
From Figure 11.34
For % floooding
= 85.45
%
and FLV
= 0.1723
Fractional
= 0.0350
entrainment, y
= 99
Appendix F - 59
= 0.1107
m2
= 2hw ( weir length, Iw - 2hw )
= 2 0.05 ( 1.2588 - 2 (0.012) )
= 0.1159
m2
m2
Appendix F - 60
= 1.964E-05
Ah
=
m2
Appendix F - 61
Plate thickness = 3
mm
= 0.003
m
Total thickness of = N plate thickness
0.024 m
=
=
=
5.40 m
1.5 m
2.0 m
=
=
1.5 m
10.42 m
plate, Hp
24"
Number of spacing =
=
Tray stack =
Extra feed space
Disengagement space
(top & column)
Skirt height
Total height of
column, Ht
Check : Ht/ Dc
=
N-1
9
(N-1) x tray spacing
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
21.7800
atm
22.0686
bar
10.42
m
1.63
m
8
Vertically oriented
Stainless steel
=
=
34.20 ft
5.36 ft
Equipment cost, C
= Co
L
LO
D
DO
( )( )
From Table 4.11, page 134, Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design:
With Co = 1000; Lo = 4.0; Do = 3.0; a = 0.81 ; b = 1.05
BC
MF
= 4.23
Appendix F - 62
MPF
= Fm Fp
Fm
= 1.93
Fp
= 1.0
= 1.0 1.93
= 1.93
MPF
(Stainless steel)
= Co
L
LO
D
DO
( )( )
(Stainless steel)
(sieve tray)
(24 inch.spacing)
then,
MPF = 2.7000
Update factor, UF = 3.53
Update bare module = Update bare module cost = UF(BC)(MPF+MF-1)
cost
= 3.57 (13418.05) (2.7 + 1 - 1)
= $19,399.04
=
RM 73,910.34
Total equipment = 799,666.65
cost, (RM)