Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
20
Paul Danove
; And God said to Cain,
Where is Abel your brother? (Gen 4:9)
, ... But I say to you, Love your enemies... (Matt 5:44)
... A messenger of the Lord said
to Gad to say to David... (1 Chr 21:18)
... And they said nothing to anyone... (Mark 16:8)
In the first two examples, the direct objects relate the exact content of
Gods and Jesus speech through quotes; whereas, in the latter two examples, the third complements (to say to David... and nothing) designate
the content of discourse. This usage of may be represented by the
following syntactic, semantic, and lexical description:
SYN.
1
(2)
[3]*
1=subject, 2=indirect object, 3=object, ( )=indef. null com., [ ]=def. null com.
SEM.
LEX.
N
N/P N/V***
*** N = noun phrase, V = verb phrase, P = prepositional phrase
21
22
Paul Danove
23
(410 in LXX and 166 in NT) appear in the format, verb of communication + . The intrusion of a verb of communication other than
between an initial verb of communication and its third complement also
appears on eleven occasions (7 in LXX and 4 in NT): + [a
second] ; + or (reply) or
(say); (ask) + ; and + . Finally,
on four occasions (2 in LXX and 2 in NT), two verbs of communication
intrude between an initial verb and its third complement: +
+ [a second] ; and + [a second] + .
melding differs from coordination in that it imposes a restriction on the number of second complements that may receive lexical realization among linked verbs. For two linked verbs, coordination permits
the lexical realization of neither, one, or both second complements even
when they have the same lexical realization. This is apparent in the coordination of two verbs that permit their second complements to receive
lexical realization as a dative case noun phrase:8
... Moses commanded Joshua and
said to him, Be brave... (Deut 31:23)
... Jonathan responded to Saul and said to him, David requested... (1 Sam 20:28)
24
Paul Danove
restriction holds in the eight occurrences in which a verb of communication is linked with a verb of communication other than and
28:1, 6; 32:5, 18, 20; 43:16; 44:1; Lev 6:2; Num 28:2; 34:13; 36:5; Deut 1:16; 2:4; 3:18, 21;
27:11; 31:10, 25; Josh 1:10, 11; 3:3, 8; 4:17; 6:10; 8:4, 18; Judg 19:30; 21:10, 20; Ruth 2:15; 1
Sam 18:22; 2 Sam 11:19; 13:28a; 18:5a, 12; 1 Kgs 2:35l; 13:9, 17; 22:31; 2 Kgs 5:5; 16:5; 17:35;
22:12; 23:21; 2 Chr 18:30; 34:20; Tob 14:3 [S]; Sir 24:8; Amos 2:12; Jer 42:6; 43:5; 45:10; Ezek
10:6; 1 Macc 5:19, 42; Matt 17:9; P/: 2 Chr 19:9; Luke 14:5); (N+dat: 1 Esdr
9:53); (N+dat: Gen 8:15; 9:8; 23:3; 39:14; 42:14, 37; 43:3a, 5; 50:24; Exod 3:12; 6:6; Josh
1:1; 2:4; 4:1, 15; 6:7; Judg 8:9 [A]; 13:6; 15:13; 1 Kgs 2:30; 12:23, 24y; 13:31; 2 Kgs 17:26; 2
Chr 32:12; Ezra 8:22; Ps 70:10; Jer 35:1; 50:26; 51:20; 1 Macc 2:17; Mark 8:28; 12:26; P/:
Gen 21:22; 31:29; 34:4; 47:5; Exod 5:10; 6:10; 7:1, 8; 9:8; 10:1; 12:1, 43; 13:1; 19:21; 35:4; Lev
23:1; Num 3:40; 7:4; 14:7, 26; 15:1, 37; 17:27; 18:1; 20:23; 28:2; 32:2, 25; Deut 1:9; Josh 2:3;
9:11; 21:2; Judg 19:22; 1 Sam 7:3; 11:14; 12:6; 26:6; 2 Sam 3:17; 17:6; 1 Kgs 1:11, 13; 12:23,
24y; 13:21; 20:17; 2 Kgs 22:10; 2 Chr 11:3; Job 34:31; Hagg 2:2, 20, 21; Zech 1:14, 17; 2:8a;
3:4; 4:4, 6; 7:3; Jer 33:12; 35:13; Luke 14:3); (N+dat: 1 Kgs 12:6; Matt 10:5); and
(N+dat: Gen 26:11; Exod 1:22; 5:6; 31:13; Josh 4:3; Jer 39:13). Second complement
of the verb of communication null and second complement of lexically realized (103
occurrences = 46 in LXX and 57 in NT): (N+dat: Gen 27:37, 39; 31:14, 31, 43;
40:18; 42:22; Num 22:18; 23:26; Deut 27:14; Ruth 2:11; 1 Sam 1:17; 1 Kgs 2:22; Ezra 10:2;
Tob 2:14; 5:1, 10; Cant 2:10; Joel 2:19; Isa 14:10; Dan 2:5, 26; 3:16; 5:13; 6:13; 7:16; DanTh
2:5, 26, 47; 3:14, 16a; 1 Macc 2:17; 15:33; Matt 11:4; 12:39, 48; 13:11; 15:3, 15, 28; 16:2, 17;
17:4; 19:27; 21:21, 24; 22:29; 24:2, 4; 25:26, 40; 26:33; 27:21; 28:5; Mark 6:37; 8:29; 9:5; 10:3,
24; 11:14, 22; 14:48; 15:12; Luke 1:19, 35; 3:11, 16; 4:8, 12; 7:22; 10:41; 11:45; 13:2, 8, 14,
25; 15:29; 17:37; Acts 19:15; Rev 7:13; P/: Judg 18:14; 1 Sam 26:6; 2 Sam 14:18; 2 Kgs
1:10; 2 Chr 34:15; Amos 7:14; Zech 1:10; 3:4; 4:5, 6, 11; 6:4; Matt 3:15; Luke 5:22, 31; 7:40;
8:21; 20:3; 24:18; Acts 4:19); (N+dat: Luke 13:27; P/: 1 Sam 20:21; Luke 20:2).
Second complement of the verb of communication null and second complement of null
(166 occurrences = 117 in LXX and 49 in NT): (N+dat: Mark 6:25); (1
Sam 27:11; 2 Sam 19:9); (2 Kgs 9:18, 20; 10:8; 1 Macc 5:14; Acts 5:22; 22:26);
(Gen 18:9, 27; 24:50; Exod 4:1; 19:8; 21:5; 24:3; Num 11:28; 32:31; Deut 21:7;
25:9; 26:5; 27:15; Josh 24:16; Judg 7:14; 20:4; Ruth 2:6; 1 Sam 1:15; 4:17; 9:21; 10:12; 14:28;
16:18; 22:9; 1 Sam 26:14b, 22; 30:22; 2 Sam 1:16; 13:32; 19:22; 20:20; 1 Kgs 1:28, 43; 3:26, 27;
18:24; 21:4, 11; 2 Kgs 1:12; 3:11; 7:2, 18; 2 Chr 29:31; Ezra 10:12; Neh 8:6; Tob 2:3; 5:3, 13
[S]; Esth 7:3; Job 1:9; Hag 2:12, 13, 14; Zech 1:6, 12; 6:5; Isa 21:9; Jer 11:5; 51:15; Ezek 9:11;
Dan 2:7; 4:30; DanTh 2:7, 8, 10, 27; 3:95; 4:19a, 19b, 30; 5:10 [A], 17; 6:14; 1 Macc 1:19; 8:19;
10:55; 13:8; Matt 4:4; 11:25; 13:37; 15:13, 24, 26; 16:16; 17:11, 17; 19:4; 20:22; 21:29, 30; 25:9,
44; 26:23, 25, 66; 27:25; Mark 12:35; Luke 1:60; 5:5; 7:43; 9:19, 20, 41, 49; 10:27; 11:7; 17:17;
19:40; 20:39; 22:51; 23:40; Acts 5:29; 8:24, 37; 15:13); (Matt 16:7; 21:25; Luke
5:21; 12:17); (2 Macc 7:6); (2 Kgs 14:6; 17:27; 2 Chr 25:4);
(Heb 12:26); (Exod 32:5; 36:6; 2 Chr 36:22; Ezra 2:20; Esth 6:9, 11; Jon 3:4; Matt
10:7; Mark 1:7); (Gen 17:17; 23:10b; Exod 15:1; 32:12; Num 11:27; 14:15, 17; Deut 9:4,
28; Judg 15:2; 1 Sam 10:18; 20:18; 27:1; 2 Chr 32:17; Hagg 1:2; Jer 35:11; 37:2; 50:2a; Ezek
16:44; 28:9; Luke 7:39); (Ezra 1:1); and (Exod 36:6; Deut 27:1).
The verb, with the connotation rebuke, requires only two complements, an agent
and a patient (what is acted upon) and so does not constitute a verb of communication as
defined above. Thus, the occurrence of + in
... (he rebuked the unclean spirit saying to it..., Mark 9:25) does not
constitute an instance of melding; and the occurrence of + +
in ... (but the other responding, rebuking
him, was saying..., Luke 23:40) constitutes an occasion of melding only with respect
to the first and third verbs.
25
both verbs have the same lexical realization of their second complements:
either the initial verb of communication (2), the following verb of communication (3), or neither verb (3) but never both verbs have their second
complement lexically realized.10 The restriction even holds in the three
occurrences of three linked verbs that permit the same lexical realization
of their second complement: only the first (1) or second (2) but never two
verbs have their second complement lexically realized.11 Thus, in these
514 occurrences, two or three linked verbs that permit the same lexical
realization of their second complement never appear with more than
one of these complements lexically realized; and both or all three verbs
govern the same concluding third complement. This indicates that their
syntactic, semantic, and lexical requirements not merely are linked as in
coordination but are melded in such a manner that both or all three verbs
lexically realize only one first, second, and third complement as if they
constituted a single verb.
The same restriction, however, does not extend to the second complement when the linked verbs do not permit the same lexical realization
of their second complements. This appears with 77 occurrences of
melding in which the initial verb, unlike , permits the lexical realization of its second complement only as an accusative case noun phrase
(N+acc), a genitive case noun phrase (N+gen), or an prepositional
phrase (P/); and the final verb, like , permits its lexical realization
only as a dative case noun phrase (N+dat) or a prepositional phrase
(P/). In the 76 occurrences of two such linked verbs, either the initial
verb (70 occurrences) or second verb (2 occurrences) or neither verb (2
occurrences) or both verbs (2 occurrences) may appear with their second
complement lexically realized.12 The one occurrence of melding
10
Second complement of the initial verb lexically realized and second complement
of the second verb null (2 occurrences in NT): + (N+dat: Luke 23:3)
and + (N+dat: Heb 6:13). Second complement of the initial verb null
and second complement of the second verb lexically realized (3 occurrences in LXX):
+ (N+dat: Jdth 6:17); + [a second] (1 Sam
10:16a; 22:22). Second complement of the initial verb lexically realized and second complement of the second verb null (3 occurrences = 2 in LXX and 1 in NT): +
(Matt 8:8); + (2 Macc 7:8); + [a second]
(Judg 14:12).
11
Second complement of the initial verb lexically realized and second complement of
the second and third verb null (1 occurrence in LXX): + + (P/:
Gen 23:10). Second complement of the initial and third verb null and second complement
of the second verb lexically realized (2 occurrences in NT): + +
(N+dat: Matt 22:1); + + (P/: Luke 14:3).
12
Second complement of verb of communication lexically realized and second complement of null (70 occurrences = 38 in LXX and 32 in NT): (N+gen: Deut 3:23;
1 Kgs 8:47; 2 Chr 6:37; Luke 5:12); (N+acc: Gen 24:23; 43:7; 2 Kgs 19:10 [A]; Jer
26
Paul Danove
with three verbs has the second complement of only one verb lexically
realized.13 These occurrences clarify that melding restricts the lexical realization of the second complement of two or three linked verbs only
when these complements permit the same lexical realization.
3. Melding and Verbs of Indirect Discourse
Thirteen of the 21 verbs that participate in melding have the
capacity to express direct discourse (i.e., a quote) through the lexical realization of its third complement as a clause with a finite verb (V+finite)
both inside and outside of the context of melding: ;
; ; ; ; ; ;
; ; ; ; ; and .14 These
23:33; Matt 12:10; 17:10; 22:23, 41; 27:11; Mark 9:11; 12:18; 14:60; 15:4; Luke 3:10, 14; 9:18;
18:18; 20:21, 27; 21:7; Acts 5:27; P/: Judg 1:1; 18:5 [R]; 20:18 [A], 27 [A], 28);
(N+acc: Gen 24:47; 32:18, 30 [R]; 37:15; 40:7; 44:19; Exod 3:13; 13:14; Deut 6:20; Josh 4:6,
21; 1 Sam 19:22; Jer 43:17; P/ 2 Sam 5:19; 1 Chr 14:10; Matt 15:23; 16:13; Luke 23:3;
John 4:31; 9:2, 19; 12:21; Acts 1:6; P/: Judg 20:18, 23; 1 Chr 14:14); (N+acc: Gen
24:37; 50:5, 25; Exod 13:19; 1 Sam 14:28; 1 Kgs 2:42; 2 Kgs 11:4); (N+acc: Deut
13:7; Matt 8:31; 18:29; Mark 5:12, 23; Luke 7:4; Acts 2:40). Second complement of verb of
communication null and second complement of lexically realized (2 occurrences in
LXX): (P/: Zech 4:4, 14). Second complement of verb of communication
null and second complement of null (2 occurrences in NT): (Luke 22:64);
(Acts 16:15). Second complement of verb of communication lexically realized
and second complement of lexically realized (2 occurrences = 1 in LXX and 1 in NT):
(N+acc / N+dat: Mark 8:27); (N+acc / P/: 2 Macc 7:21).
13
In the melding of + + (Gen 43:7), the second has
its second complement lexically realized as N+acc. This singular occurrence also conforms
to the restriction that only one of the two verbs that permit the same lexical realization of
the second complement have it lexically realized.
14
On at least one occasion, each of these thirteen verbs expresses direct discourse outside of the context of melding through the lexical realization of its complement as
a clause with a finite verb (V+finite) that accommodates a quote: (Exod 19:3;
20:22; Judg 13:10; 2 Sam 24:13; 1 Kgs 18:11; Ps 51:1; Amos 3:9 [R]; Jer 4:5, 16; 26:14; 27:2);
(Gen 46:31; Judg 13:10 [A]; 14:2; 1 Sam 14:43b; 2 Sam 11:5; 13:34; 17:21 [R]; 2
Kgs 4:7; 5:4; Amos 3:9; Isa 48:20 [A,S]; Luke 8:20); (Gen 29:26 [R]; Judg 5:29,
29b [A]; 1 Sam 9:17; 12:3a; 20:28; 21:6; 23:4; 29:9; 2 Sam 4:9; Ps 101:24; Job 3:2; Cant 6:1;
Isa 3:7; Dan 4:19; 5:17; Mark 7:28; 9:17; Luke 4:4; 8:50; 13:15; 17:20; John 1:21, 48, 49, 50;
2:18, 19; 3:3, 5, 9, 10, 27; 4:10, 13, 17; 5:7, 11, 17, 19; 6:7, 26, 29, 43, 68, 70; 7:16, 20, 21, 46,
47, 52; 8:14, 19, 33, 34, 39, 48, 49, 54; 9:3, 11, 20, 25, 27, 30, 34, 36; 10:25, 32, 33, 34; 11:9;
12:23, 30, 34; 13:7, 8, 26, 38; 14:23; 16:31; 18:5, 8, 20, 23, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37; 19:7, 11, 15, 22;
21:5; Acts 3:12; 5:8; 9:13; 10:46; 11:9; 21:13; 22:8, 28; 24:10, 25; 25:12); (Acts 21:39);
(Mark 2:6); (Lev 24:2; Num 34:2; Deut 31:23; Josh 1:9; Judg 4:26;
2 Kgs 11:15; 2 Chr 23:14; Neh 7:2; Tob 14:8 [S]; Ps 118:4; Lam 1:10; Matt 4:6; Acts 13:47);
(Gen 38:21; 1 Sam 14:37; 17:56; 2 Kgs 8:9; Jdth 10:12; Sus 40; 2 Macc 7:7; 14:5;
27
Matt 22:35; Mark 5:9; 7:5; 8:23, 29; 9:16, 21, 28, 33; 10:17; 12:28; 13:3; 14:61; 15:2; Luke 8:30;
18:40; John 18:7); (Gen 43:27; Judg 4:20; 13:6; Ezra 5:9; Tob 6:7; 7:3; 1 Macc 10:72;
Isa 41:28; Jer 6:16; 18:13; 31:19; Mark 8:5; Luke 14:18, 19; 19:31; John 1:19, 21, 25; 5:12; 16:5;
Phil 4:3); (Prov 1:21; Hos 5:8; Zeph 3:14; Dan 3:4; Matt 3:1; 4:17; Rev 5:2);
(Gen 15:2; Exod 2:13; Tob 3:10; Amos 1:6; Dan 2:27; and many others); (Num 5:19,
21; Neh 13:25); (1 Sam 10:17; Dan 3:4); and (Esth 5:1e; 1 Macc
13:3; Isa 13:2; 35:4; Matt 8:5; Acts 9:38; 16:9; 1 Cor 4:16; 1 Thess 5:14; 1 Pet 5:1).
15
The eight verbs elsewhere permit only the following lexical realizations of verb phrase
third complements: (V+; V+i; V-i); (V+; V+ ); (V+ ; V+
; V+; V+ ); (V+ ); (V-i); (V-i); (V+i;
V-i); and (V+ ; V+i; V-i). These verbs also permit the lexical realization of
their third complement as noun phrases (N) and prepositional phrases (P).
28
Paul Danove
all three verbs permit the same lexical realization for their third complement. Among these, 499 occurrences are associated with eight verbs
of direct discourse that also permit the same lexical realization of the
second complement and meld in such a manner that both or all three
verbs together appear with only one first, second, and third complement
lexically realized: ; ; ; ;
; ; ; and . English style, in contrast
to Greek style, avoids multiple verbs of communication that govern the
same object complement and, in general, prohibits the repetition of the
same verb with the same complement (as in two consecutive forms of
). Thus, English style recommends a simplification of two or three
such linked verbs in translation. Since the linked Greek verbs function as
a single predicator and each of these linked verbs has at least one English
translation with the same syntactic, semantic, and lexical requirements as
the translations of the other linked verbs, stylistic considerations recommend that these 499 occurrences of linked Greek verbs be translated by a
single English verb that governs all of the lexically realized complements
of the linked Greek verbs. The linked Greek verbs then would be translated according to three hierarchical rules: (1) never is translated and
is translated only when both of two linked verbs are forms of ;
(2) the finite verb is translated unless it is or in which case the
first participle is translated as a finite verb; and (3) when the finite verb
of the clause is not a verb of communication (and so doesnt participate
in melding) and the linked verbs of communication are participles, the first participle is translated.16 The following examples illustrate
translations according to these rules, with the untranslated Greek words
underlined:17
16
Although these rules respect the semantic requirements of the participating verbs,
this discussion recognizes that literary, rhetorical, or other considerations may recommend
the translation of more than one linked verb in particular contexts. The inclusion of the
three occurrences of in the first two rules reflects its identical function to in
these contexts.
17
The remaining six verbs follow the same rules of translation: e.g.,
(and Jonathan told David, Saul is
seeking to kill you, 1 Sam 19:2); , ...
(and they were discussing among themselves, If we say..., Mark 11:31);
(and you were commanding the prophets, Do
not prophesy!, Amos 2:12);
(but going forth proclaim, The reign of [the] heaven[s] has come near, Matt
10:7); [] (but they said to him,
[He is] John the Baptist, Mark 8:28); and
, ... (Jesus sent these twelve commanding them, Do not go forth onto a road of Gentiles..., Matt 10:5).
29
30
Paul Danove
... and you
will inform your son, The Jordan River left off... (Josh 4:7)
, , ... and he was ordering them, Watch,
beware... (Mark 8:15)
31
in translation. For example, five of the thirteen verbs that express direct
discourse have a majority of their occurrences with omitted third complements precisely in the context of melding: (301 of
332); (6 of 8); (32 of 41); (28 of 34);
and (9 of 14).20 Such a preponderance of occurrences within the
context of melding has the potential to obscure their requirement
that third complements be definite when null. Given the previously noted
differences in English and Greek style, translation of these occurrences
without careful attention to the third complement of the final linked verb
has the potential to introduce into the English translation ambiguities
not present in the Greek text.
Third, eight of the verbs that participate in melding are restricted
to the expression of indirect discourse outside of this context. Inclusion of
a note about melding into the lexicon entries for these verbs would
clarify that these verbs in fact are reserved to the expression of indirect
discourse and that the occurrences with V+finite third complements are
a function of an intruding grammatical construction and not a function
of the verbs themselves.
These considerations indicate that attention to the phenomenon of
melding has implications both for translation and the grammatical
description of Greek verbs of communication.
Paul DANOVE
Dept. of Theology and Religious Studies
Villanova University
800 Lancaster Avenue
Villanova, PA 19085-1699 (USA)
20
The remaining verbs have half or fewer of their intransitive occurrences in the context
of melding: (11 of 70); (20 of 83); (1 of 3);
(62 of 156); (9 of 26); [a second] (119 of +7000); (1 of 2); and
(11 of 23).