Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(PURUSHA)PRAKRITI
SATTVIC
AHAMKARA
RAJASIC
AHAMKARA
TAMASIC
AHAMKARA
(impelling both)
MANAS
10 INDRIYAS
(Lower Mind)
(Powers / Capacities)
KARMENDRIYAS
(Active Senses)
Speech Organs
Hands
Feet
Organs of Generation
Organs of Elimination
BUDDHINDRIYAS
(Cognitive Senses)
Ears
Skin
Eyes
Tongue
Nose
5 TANMATRAS
Subtle Elements)
Sound (Shabda)
Touch (Sparsa)
Sight-Form (Rupa)
Taste (Rasa)
Smell (Gandha)
5 BHUTAS
(Gross Elements)
Space (Akasha)
Air (Vayu)
Fire (Agni, Tejas, Jyoti)
Water (Apah)
Earth (Prithivi)
______________________________________________________________________________
(The principle in
ritual is to sacrifice
(lit. "sacred act") the
Gross to the Subtle,
the Material to the
Spiritual.)
2006, 20012 Himalayan Yoga Tradition Teacher Training Program, All rights reserved
Page 1
Page 2
discussion and your libraries and your novels, stories, films and the whole intellectual process of
criticism and analysis between that and meditation, until you have taken those branches to the
trunk and the trunk back to the seed also through twenty minutes a day of meditation, you will not
reach ultimate enlightenment.
In Swami Vedas Commentary on Patanjalis Yoga-sutras these three important philosophical
concepts are explained:
Prati-prasava: The dissolution of [d]evolutes in reverse order of their creation; effects dissolving
into their causes and finally into prakrti; the return of the gunas into equilibium in their ultimate
cause (unmanifest prakrti).
Prati-chanchara: In Sankhya philosophy, the principle of orderly dissolution of material
[d]evolutes into their causes in reverse order of their [d]evolution and development (sanchara); the
dissolution of the universe and its phenomena.
Sat-karya-vada: A doctrine of Sankhya schools stating that the qualities of objects pre-exist in
their causes, that gunas are constantly transmuted into their [d]evolutes, and that a cause does not
cease to be simply because it is transmuted into an effect. "That which is not, does not come into
being; that which is, never ceases to be." (Bhagavad Gita II.16)
Lecture IV on Sankhya:
"Pain, and the Four Purposes of Life"
by Swami Veda Bharati
August 8th, 1973
Om. Saha nav avatu. Saha nau bhunaktu. Saha viryam karavavahai.
Tejasvi nav adhitam astu. Ma vidvisavahai. Om. Shanti, Shanti, Shanti.
Om. May He protect us together. May he accept of our offerings together. May we gather strength together.
May our study be filled with brilliance. May there be no distances among us. Om. Peace, Peace, Peace.
So the purpose of the study of Sankhya philosophy is discrimination to find the one and
the one in the two. Which is the one and which is the other one. There is one thing in
common between Sankhya-Yoga and Buddhism. That both start out with the problem of
pain. It is not certain historically whether Sankhya borrowed the preoccupation with pain
from Buddhism or that Sankhya had already developed this philosophy, and then it was
passed on to the Buddha. I already told you that the birthplace of the Buddha was
Kapilavastu, the city which was built on the site of the ashram of the sage Kapila [the great
sage of Sankhya philosophy] and that Buddha in his wanderings in search of Truth spent a
great deal of time with a Sankhya teacher named Aradakalam. The Four Noble Truths of
the Buddha are called the Arya-Satya (Noble Truths). They are dukham, duhkha-hetuh,
duhkha-hanam and dukha-hanopaya. (Pain, the cause of pain, the removal of pain, and the
means of removing the pain.) This was the first Truth that dawned upon the Buddha.
There is also Vyasa, the commentator on the Yoga-sutras, the most authentic, most
important commentator on the Sutras. You cannot read the Yoga-sutras without the
2006, 20012 Himalayan Yoga Tradition Teacher Training Program, All rights reserved
Page 3
commentary of Vyasa. And Vyasa says the identical words. He says, "As the medical
science is four-fold: disease, cause of disease, removal of disease, and the means if
removing the disease, so the Moksa-shastra (the Science of Liberation) is fourfold: pain,
the cause of pain, the removal of pain, and the means of removing the pain, the same
fourfold things.
The text I am reading here is in verse form. There is also Sankhya-sutra, which the
traditional Indian orthodox teachers regard as very ancient; however, modern Western
scholarship regards it as very recent, about the 11th Century A.D. The first sutra is "atha
trividha-dubkha- ????? yanta-nirvrttih atyanta-purusarthah." We must understand the
word "purushartha." Remember I spoke of purusha, the conscious principle, the sentient
principle, the purpose of a purusha, of a personality coming into being, coming into life , is
fourfold and this is the essence of the entire Hinduism. Everyone, all schools philosophy
agree on this purushartha, the purpose of the existence of human beings. The Vedic
philosophy, and the epics like the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, and all the stories,
everything is geared towards that one aim, explaining the purpose of human beings what
is your personal purpose in life. And this is fourfold. If you don't know the four
purusharthas, you know nothing, absolutely nothing about the Hindu philosophy. You can
call it Yoga philosophy, you can call it Vedanta philosophy, if you want give non-sectarian
names, fine anything but the view of life as developed in India is this fourfold
purushartha, the purpose of human beings. The purpose of a personality being constituted:
Dharma, artha, kama, and moksha.
Dharma
Dharma is "the right way," although dharma is a lot more than that. Dharma is the natural
order of all things, an understanding of that natural order. The first thing is the natural
order, the natural qualities of things, the natural harmony of the universe. The second part
in dharma will then be a person's understanding of that natural order and thereby regarding
himself part of that natural order. So that at any point where there is no understanding of
the natural order, there is no understanding of persons. And therefore, then, the right action
cannot evolve; because without understanding, without jnana, there is no karma, no action.
So you come to dharma also meaning the way of life. So you have three things: natural
order, understanding of the natural order, and then the way of life based on that natural
order. A way of life based on that natural order, the corollary of which will then be all the
laws, all the politics, all the economics, all the rituals, all the ceremonies, the whole social
bit. Everything. So to say that the Yoga philosophy is not inclusive of the natural order,
that Yoga philosophy is not inclusive of the socio-political questions and so on, is wrong.
It must be included. They come under dharma.
Artha
From those laws, from "the right way," is derived and is dependent on that dharma is the
second category: artha. "Artha" simply means "means." And that includes the details of
your material needs. What business should I go into? How should I be successful in it?
How should I run my politics? How should I vote for an assembly? What taxation should
I charge as a King? What taxes should I pay as a subject? All of that is the means.
2006, 20012 Himalayan Yoga Tradition Teacher Training Program, All rights reserved
Page 4
Kama
Kama is the desires, passions, which are normal and natural in persons for the fulfillment of
a proper family life. And for an average person without these three, without passing
through these three, there is no moksa, no liberation. Quite often a teacher, a yogi, a
master, will force a householder to fulfill his desires quickly. Work intensively and fulfill
them. If according to your karma you are meant to earn, let us say two million dollars in
your lifetime, finish earning them in two years. Go ahead, hurry up, quickly! Then you are
through. Rather than linger on, linger on, linger on, linger on and go die without moksha,
finish doing that fast, hurry and then go. You paid off your karma.
Moksha
And then finally is mokha, which is release, liberation, enlightenment. (Answering a
question) Yes, it's a gradual moksha, I should say. Each school of philosophy defines
moksha according to its belief. To be released to a certain degree is to be released too.
(Another question.) By expansion. The progress is measured by expansion, how wide you
are. I was just teaching a text on Shaivism. As the bondage develops the Atman that was
all-pervading becomes apu (minute). And as the anava-mala, the dirt around it, is washed,
it expands. Expansion of consciousness.
The first sutra of the Sankhya-sutras (recites the verse in Skt.), he says, "Now we shall
discuss total removal of the three-fold pain." Total atyanta, total removal of the three-fold
pain. This is the definition of total purusartha, the final purpose of humans. What is the
three-fold pain? Remember the lecture Swami Rama gave to that group of doctors
downstairs Wednesday night? He said, "Give me a topic." And Dr. Mayo said, "Why don't
you speak on the value of pain?" And Swamiji started with, "There are three kinds of pain,
adhyatmika. adhidaivika. and adhibhautika."
adhyatmika: relating to atma, or self, not necessarily the supreme Self, but personal self,
adhidaivika: coming from devas, natural forces and their presiding deities, and
adhibhautika: resulting from the interaction between the living beings.
The adhyamika pain is two fold, physical and mental. In fact the medical philosophy of
India goes into a great deal of detail on this. This is one thing about the texts on any
science in Sanskrit. They must go through the relationship of the things in the spiritual
world to the problems for which we are now seeking solutions. The student slogan today
of the need for "relevance in education" is very familiar to me. How relevant is it to my
spiritual progress? So if a new surgical instrument is developed, I must view it as a means
towards spiritual liberation. If you cannot prove the connection to me then it is of no use to
me. So physical and mental pain is the pain of the person, adhyatmika. Adhidaivika
comes from natural forces and their presiding "deities," rains and floods and those things,
in which people often suffer collectively or individually. And third is adhibhautika, a
mosquito bite or a war - interaction among the living beings.
So, according to the first sutra, the total removal of the three kinds of pain is the final, the
highest purpose of the existence of human beings. Sometimes you will hear some of the
academicians state that the problem of human pain was not considered in Indian
2006, 20012 Himalayan Yoga Tradition Teacher Training Program, All rights reserved
Page 5
philosophy. This is wrong. An entire school of philosophy was developed on the word
"dhuka," pain.
Here now I start with the Sankhya-karika which is the versified text:
"The total removal of pain cannot be accomplished through visible means."
Anything that is accomplished through visible means is always seen to return. Let us say,
pain of hunger. You remove it through visible means, but the moment you have finished
eating, it starts again. You have attempts at removing disease, the disease returns. Some
diseases have been totally eradicated from the earth, but other diseases have returned to
take their place. Malaria mosquitoes were killed to extinction, but now a strain has
developed that is totally immune to the spray. We say, "Let's put a hospital within
everybody's reach and make a very fast road so a sick man can reach the doctor quickly."
So these are built, and although some people stopped dying from disease, they died from
auto accidents. No matter what precautions you take to remove human misery, you will
remove one category of human misery, but another category will automatically,
immediately take its place. You remove physical diseases, or hunger and poverty and that
kind of discomfort and misery, you create a society in which those things no longer exist,
immediately you create a society in which psychological disease has increased a hundredfold. Now you have more psychiatric patients than you have physically ill patients in the
United States. This is because these attempts, however valid for an individual type of
disease, at removing human misery are naturally replaced by other diseases.
Therefore, says a Sankhya philosopher, let us look for a means of removing the pains of
persons which is permanent. He says among the visible, the sensed objects, the material
things of the world, we do not find a means whereby there will be total removal of all three
kinds of pain. Again, the philosopher says, if you want to test whether a law "x" or an
action "x", a goal, a pursuit, is really a valid means for removing the pain then test whether
all the three kinds of pain will equally be removed by it. But if you remove a physical pain
and cause mental pain, or if you remove mental pain and cause physical pain, then it is not
a valid means. And, if the pain returns in another form, then, too, it was not a valid means.
Now, the verse says that people suffering from these three kinds of pain will naturally have
a desire to seek for a means for removing the pain. And we find that the visible means
which we see before us is not sufficient; for we are looking for something that is beyond
the tangible means for removing the pain.
The second verse: (in Sanskrit) is something visible in religious arts, rituals ceremonies,
and worship. Don't they contribute to the removal of pain? Sankhya says, "No!" The
seeking of heaven is no seeking of liberation. Heaven is a temporary state. The pleasures
of paradise are just a form of temporary experience resulting from good deeds. Even the
good deeds, ritual acts, and that kind of external worship leads to the temporary state of
heaven. When the force, momemtum of good karmas is exhausted, one must return from
heaven to earth to start anew. The only way of total eradication of pain is by the
knowledge of three factors:
2006, 20012 Himalayan Yoga Tradition Teacher Training Program, All rights reserved
Page 6
2006, 20012 Himalayan Yoga Tradition Teacher Training Program, All rights reserved
Page 7
In other words, "pleasant" is not the antonym of "painful." This point must be understood
about the Sankhya and Yoga philosophy. "Pleasant" is not the exact opposite of "pain."
There are three separate categories: the painful, the pleasant, and the Good. And the Good
is beyond pain and pleasure. In other words, we should draw the diagram in this way on
the blackboard: Shreyas is equated with ananda (the Supreme Joy, the Perfect Joy of God)
Magut, (the Supreme Bliss). And the opposite of that shreyas and ananda is preyas and
kriyas or gupta (pleasure versus pain). So, whereas in the path of withdrawal there is only
one category, the Good, which is one and the same as Supreme Joy; when you move away
from that unity, you immediately come into the duality of pain versus pleasure. Where
ever there is duality there is pain. And therefore, pleasure is pain because it is part of that
duality. It is pain because it is always coupled with pain. It's pleasantness is derived
through comparison with a pain. Only compared to a certain pain is something pleasant.
So, Shreyan, the Good, the higher wellbeing is arrived at through the knowledge of Bhakti
and Jnana that we spoke of last time. The manifest/unmanifest, and the Knower. And then
in Chapter 13 of the Bhagavad-gita there is the knowledge of the field, and the fieldknower.
2006, 20012 Himalayan Yoga Tradition Teacher Training Program, All rights reserved
Page 8
*A clay pot is a tradition symbol for the human body. One of the teachings which uses this
analogy describes the pot as having space around it and space within it. When the pot
breaks (symbolizing death), space joins with space, the droplet joins the ocean, the infinite
within joins the infinite without, and there is the realization that there never was any
difference between the internal reality and the external reality, fullness joins with fullness,
perfection joins with perfection as in the morning Prayer of Perfection.
2006, 20012 Himalayan Yoga Tradition Teacher Training Program, All rights reserved
Page 9