Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PROJECT ON
A STUDY ON TYPES OF ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION
SUBMITTED BY
ASHISH S. TIWARI
ROLL NO. A-90
SUBMITTED TO
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
DECLARATION
INTEGRATION
as
part
of
Internal
________________
Date of Submission.
(Ashish S.Tiwari)
________________
Signature of
CERTIFICATE
has
been
Project Guide: -
_______________
Course Co-ordinator: -
_______________
External Examiner: -
_______________
Principal: -
_______________
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
DateMumbai
Signature of Student
(Ashish
S.Tiwari )
TYPES OF
ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION
INDEX
SR.N
O
TOPIC
1.
2.
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVE & THEORY OF ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION
3.
TYPES OF ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION
4.
5.
6.
CONCLUSION
7.
BIBLIOGARPHY
PG.N
O
INTODUCTION OF ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION
Economic integration is the unification of economic policies between different
states through the partial or full abolition of tariff and non-tariff restrictions on
trade taking place among them prior to their integration. This is meant in turn
to lead to lower prices for distributors and consumers with the goal of
increasing the level of welfare, while leading to and increase of economic
productivity of the states.
The trade stimulation effects intended by means of economic integration are
part of the contemporary economic Theory of the Second Best: where, in
theory, the best option is free trade, with free competition and no trade
barriers whatsoever. Free trade is treated as an idealistic option, and although
realized within certain developed states, economic integration has been
thought of as the "second best" option for global trade where barriers to full
free trade exist.
Economic integration, process in which two or more states in a broadly
defined geographic area reduce a range of trade barriers to advance or
protect a set of economic goals
There are varying levels of economic integration, including preferential
trade agreements (PTA), free trade areas (FTA), customs unions, common
markets and economic and monetary unions. The more integrated
the economies become, the fewer trade barriers exist and the more
economic and political coordination there is between the member
countries.
By integrating the economies of more than one country, the short-term
benefits from the use of tariffs and other trade barriers is diminished. At the
same time, the more integrated the economies become, the less power the
CONCEPT OF ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION
Regional economic integration is a new and striking idea for the expansion of foreign trade among
developing countries. Regional economic integration implies the creation of the most desirable
structure of inter-regional economy through the formation of a customs union or of a free, trade
within the region and deliberately introducing all desirable elements of coordination and
unification.
Generally, such an economic integration would have to pass through three distinct but interdependent stages of cooperation, co-ordination and finally, of full integration. So, economic
integration may be identified as liberalization of trade as well as factor movements.
Complete economic integration involves a single economic market, a common
trade policy, a single currency, a common monetary policy (EMU) together
with a single fiscal policy, tax and benefit rates in short, complete
harmonisation of all policies, rates, and economic trade rules.
OBJECTIVE OF ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION
There are economic as well as political reasons why nations pursue economic
integration. The economic rationale for the increase of trade between
member states of economic unions that it is meant to lead to
higher productivity. This is one of the reasons for the global scale
development of economic integration, a phenomenon now realized in
continental economic blocks such as ASEAN, NAFTA, SACN, the European
Union, and the Eurasian Economic Community; and proposed for
intercontinental economic blocks, such as the Comprehensive Economic
Partnership for East Asia and the Transatlantic Free Trade Area.
Comparative advantage refers to the ability of a person or a country to
produce a particular good or service at a lowermarginal and opportunity
cost over another. Comparative advantage was first described by David
Ricardo who explained it in his 1817 book On the Principles of Political
Economy and Taxation in an example involving England and Portugal.[3] In
Portugal it is possible to produce both wine and cloth with less labour than it
would take to produce the same quantities in England. However the relative
costs of producing those two goods are different in the two countries. In
England it is very hard to produce wine, and only moderately difficult to
produce cloth. In Portugal both are easy to produce. Therefore while it is
cheaper to produce cloth in Portugal than England, it is cheaper still for
Portugal to produce excess wine, and trade that for English cloth. Conversely
England benefits from this trade because its cost for producing cloth has not
changed but it can now get wine at a lower price, closer to the cost of cloth.
The conclusion drawn is that each country can gain by specializing in the
good where it has comparative advantage, and trading that good for the
other.
Economies of scale refers to the cost advantages that an enterprise obtains
due to expansion. There are factors that cause a producers average cost per
unit to fall as the scale of output is increased. Economies of scale is a long run
concept and refers to reductions in unit cost as the size of a facility and the
usage levels of other inputs increase.[4] Economies of scale is also a
justification for economic integration, since some economies of scale may
require a larger market than is possible within a particular country for
example, it would not be efficient for Liechtenstein to have its own car maker,
if they would only sell to their local market. A lone car maker may be
profitable, however, if they export cars to global markets in addition to selling
to the local market.
Besides these economic reasons, the primary reasons why economic
integration has been pursued in practise are largely political. The Zollverein or
German Customs Union of 1867 paved the way for German (partial)
unification under Prussian leadership in 1871.
THEORY OF ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION
The framework of the theory of economic integration was laid out by Jacob
Viner (1950) who defined the trade creation and trade diversion effects, the
terms introduced for the change of interregional flow of goods caused by
changes in customs tariffs due to the creation of an economic union. He
considered trade flows between two states prior and after their unification,
and compared them with the rest of the world. His findings became and still
are the foundation of the theory of economic integration. The next attempts
to enlarge the static analysis towards three states world (Lipsey, et al.) were
not as successful.
The basics of the theory were summarized by the Hungarian economist Bla
Balassa in the 1960s. As economic integration increases, the barriers of trade
between markets diminish. Balassa believed that supranational common
markets, with their free movement of economic factors across national
borders, naturally generate demand for further integration, not only
economically (via monetary unions) but also politicallyand, thus, that
economic communities naturally evolve into political unions over time.
The dynamic part of international economic integration theory, such as the
dynamics of trade creation and trade diversion effects , the Pareto
efficiency of factors (labor, capital) and value added, mathematically was
introduced by Ravshanbek Dalimov. This provided an interdisciplinary
approach to the previously static theory of international economic integration,
showing what effects take place due to economic integration, as well as
enabling the results of the non-linear sciences to be applied to the dynamics
of international economic integration.
were successfully applied towards:
1. the dynamics of GDP;
2. price-output dynamics and the dynamic matrix of the outputs of an
economy;
3. regional and inter-regional migration of labor income and value added,
and to trade creation and trade diversion effects (inter-regional output
flows).
The straightforward conclusion from the findings is that one may use the
accumulated knowledge of the exact and natural sciences (physics,
biodynamic, and chemical kinetics) and apply them towards the analysis and
forecasting of economic dynamics.
Dynamic analysis has started with a new definition of gross domestic
product (GDP), as a difference between aggregate revenues of sectors and
investment (a modification of the value added definition of the GDP).
SUCCESS FACTORS
TYPES OF ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION
3.CUSTOMS UNION
A customs union occurs when a group of countries agree to eliminate tariffs between themselves
and set a common external tariff on imports from the rest of the world. The European Union
represents such an arrangement. A customs union avoids the problem of developing complicated
rules of origin, but introduces the problem of policy coordination. With a customs union, all
member countries must be able to agree on tariff rates across many different import industries.
4.COMMON MARKET
A common market establishes free trade in goods and services, sets common external tariffs
among members and also allows for the free mobility of capital and labor across countries. The
5.ECONOMIC UNION
An economic union typically will maintain free trade in goods and services, set common external
tariffs among members, allow the free mobility of capital and labor, and will also relegate some
fiscal spending responsibilities to a supra-national agency. The European Union's Common
Agriculture Policy (CAP) is an example of a type of fiscal coordination indicative of an economic
union.
6.MONETARY UNION
Monetary union establishes a common currency among a group of countries. This involves the
formation of a central monetary authority which will determine monetary policy for the entire
group.
Perhaps the best example of an economic and monetary union is the United States. Each US state
has its own government which sets policies and laws for its own residents. However, each state
cedes control, to some extent, over foreign policy, agricultural policy, welfare policy, and
monetary policy to the federal government. Goods, services, labor and capital can all move freely,
without restrictions among the US states and the Nations sets a common external trade policy.
7.POLITICAL UNION
Represents the potentially most advanced form of integration with a common government
The level of Economic integration as opposed to its complexity is illustrated in the graph below:
IN TRADE
OF AGREEMENT.
When countries enter into regional integration, they easily get into agreements and stick to them
for long periods of time.
3. IMPROVED
POLITICAL COOPERATION.
Countries entering economic integration form groups and have greater political influence as
compared to influence created by a single nation. Integration is a vital strategy for addressing the
effects of political instability and human conflicts that might affect a region.
4. OPPORTUNITIES
FOR EMPLOYMENT.
The various options available in economic integration help to liberalize and encourage trade. This
results in market expansion due to which high amount of capital is invested in a countrys
economy. This creates higher opportunities for employment of people from all over the world.
They thus move from one country to another in search of jobs or for earning higher pay.
5. BENEFICIAL FOR
FINANCIAL MARKETS.
Economic integration is extremely beneficial for financial markets as it eases firm to borrow
finances at low rate if interest. This is because capital liquidity of larger capital market increases
and the resultant diversification effect reduces the risks associated with high investment.
6. INCREASE
Economic integration helps to increase the amount of money in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).
Once firms start FDI, through new operations or by merger, takeover, and acquisition, it becomes
an international enterprise.
Thus economic integration is a win-win situation for all the firms, people and the economies
involved in the process
CONTENTS
The European Union is not the only international
organisation immersed in a process of regional