0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
34 просмотров1 страница
Marketisation of education has been school and higher education very expensive and a longstanding understanding of the social situation of women indicates that a majority of the parents are reluctant to invest in the education of their daughters whose education does not have a production value because her income goes to the groom’s family. It is important to focus on Gender dynamics Economics of Education. In the drive for privatization, women as students are the main losers as parents channelise financial resources for son’s education, daughter’s education is considered to be less important. NAAC study reveals that there is ghettoisation of women in general higher education (Arts and Commerce) and mostly men throng professional colleges (Engineering, Architect, Medicine, Science & Technology).
Marketisation of education has been school and higher education very expensive and a longstanding understanding of the social situation of women indicates that a majority of the parents are reluctant to invest in the education of their daughters whose education does not have a production value because her income goes to the groom’s family. It is important to focus on Gender dynamics Economics of Education. In the drive for privatization, women as students are the main losers as parents channelise financial resources for son’s education, daughter’s education is considered to be less important. NAAC study reveals that there is ghettoisation of women in general higher education (Arts and Commerce) and mostly men throng professional colleges (Engineering, Architect, Medicine, Science & Technology).
Marketisation of education has been school and higher education very expensive and a longstanding understanding of the social situation of women indicates that a majority of the parents are reluctant to invest in the education of their daughters whose education does not have a production value because her income goes to the groom’s family. It is important to focus on Gender dynamics Economics of Education. In the drive for privatization, women as students are the main losers as parents channelise financial resources for son’s education, daughter’s education is considered to be less important. NAAC study reveals that there is ghettoisation of women in general higher education (Arts and Commerce) and mostly men throng professional colleges (Engineering, Architect, Medicine, Science & Technology).
Higher education in India is passing through a phase of unprecedented expansion, marked by
an explosion in the volume of students, a substantial expansion in the number of institutions
and a quantum jump in the level of public funding. The enormity of the challenge of providing equal opportunities for quality higher education to ever-growing number of students is also a historic opportunity for correcting sectoral and social imbalances, reinvigorating institutions, crossing international benchmarks of excellence and extending the frontiers of knowledge. The 12th FYP shall focus on utilizing this historic opportunity of expansion for deepening excellence and achieving equal access to quality higher education. 11th FYP Achievements: India has made enormous strides in achieving these goals in more than six decades since independence, and the success milestones of its higher education system are recognized globally. Yet, considerable challenges remain. In this direction, the 12th FYP document provides the details of the present trends, prevailing issues and challenges, projected goals and the planned strategies for the 12th FYP with schemes and programmes under the three major heads of Access, Equity and Quality with interlaced components of relevance, valueeducation and creativity. This volume is the outcome of the research findings of academicians and researchers of different disciplines. The 13 research papers included in this work throw light on various dimensions of higher education in India. It tries to explore the present condition and analysis of past development experiences in the higher education sector and will propose new initiatives to address the needs of the higher education sector. Further the book will looks in detail at the issues of access, equity and excellence in the Indian higher education system.
Born in 1973 at Lumding (Nagoan District) in Assam, Dr. Kartick Das
obtained his Bachelor Degree from Guwahati University, Assam; Masters Degree from Banaras Hindu University, Uttar Pradesh; Master of Philosophy and Doctorate of Philosophy from University of North Bengal, West Bengal. He worked as a lecturer in Political Science in Cinemora College, Jorhat, Assam for one year, as Assistant Professor in St. Joseph's college, Darjeeling for two years, as Assistant Professor in Political Science, Mathabhanga College, Coochbehar, West Bengal for ten years. Currently, he is an Assistant Professor in Political Science Samuktala Sidhu Kanhu College, Samuktala, Alipurduar District, West Bengal. He has completed one UGC sponsored research project and presently pursuing another major project under financial assistance of UGC in the area of tribal studies. He has published five books and number articles in different reputed national and international journals in the areas of Indian economy reforms and inclusive development. He has participated in various national and international seminars and workshops and his areas of research interest include tribal studies, inclusive development, mutual funds and finance.