Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Director, DGCI&S
activities in service sector. Total number of composite jute mills, at present, stands at 77 and
State-wise distribution is W.Bengal- 60, Andhra Pradesh 7, Bihar 3, U.P. 3, Assam
1, Orissa- 1, Chhattishgarh -1, Tripura 1. Apart from the aforesaid jute mills, there exist 8
manufacturing units working as 100% EOUs in jute sector for production of high quality
yarn/twine, jute decorative, fine hessian cloth, food grade jute bags and blended fabrics.
Thanks to various incentive schemes launched by the Government of India juxtaposed with
vigorous campaigns through participation/ organization of trade fairs, workshops, seminars
within the country and outside the country by market promotional Govt. bodies, jute-related
activities have disseminated encouragingly not only in the jute growing States but also in the
non-jute growing States of the country. A Study was undertaken by the WEBCON in the
year 2005-06 under the sponsorship of Jute Manufactures Development Council, a
statutory body of the Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India and on the basis of that study, JMDC
published a Report titled as National Directory Producers and Exporters of Jute
Diversified Products 2006. As per the study, number of Jute Diversified Product units
throughout the country has increased from 696 at the end of 1999-2000 to 1320 as on
31.05.2005 with W. Bengal having an encouraging number of JDP units at 673, rise in
number of direct employment in decentralized sector from 88,377 in the year 2001-02 to
1,42,338 during 2003-04 year and export share of JDPs increased from 15% in the year
2000-01 to 26% in 2005-06.
1.2 In the world of natural fibres, cotton occupies the leading position and jute comes next.
Besides its technical advantages like strength and length of the fibre, good moisture
absorption, dye-ability, good heat and sound insulation properties, the strength of jute
primarily lies on its biodegradability, renew ability, eco-friendliness, However, jute has some
disadvantages, like its coarseness, stiffness, high combustibility, yellowing and browning
under sunlight, poor crease recovery, poor durability, poor wash-ability, etc. Considering all
these advantages and disadvantages of jute, jute products still are predominantly used for
packaging and wrapping purposes. However, Govt. of India with assistance of UNDP
programmes and active cooperation and support from different textiles R&D institutions is
vigorously striving to bring about a discernible qualitative improvement in jute products and
also encourage diverse uses of jute, viz. jute geo-textiles, decorative fabrics, upholsteries,
furnishing fabrics, woven carpets, soft luggage, composites, paper pulp, handicraft and
handloom items, etc. Attempts are also being made to further diversify its end-uses by
blending/ unionizing jute with other textile materials to enhance its consumer appeal and
acceptability.
1.3 A technical assessment of Indias Jute mills: Although, India is a major producer of
jute products in the world, not much progress has been made in the manufacturing process
in jute industry which has taken place in other areas of textile industry, particularly in cotton
and man-made sectors. Slow pace of modernization in jute industry has been due to
insufficient availability of new generation high productive machines for processing jute. As a
result, Govt. policy towards modernization in case of jute industry has given emphasis on
two aspects viz.i) thorough renovation of old machinery and (ii) replacement of very old
machines with similar type of new machines With a view to have an idea of the extent of
modernization in jute industry, Govt. of India appointed Indian Jute Industries Research
Association (IJIRA), a premier jute research institute, to undertake a Technological Audit
of jute mills A draft report on Technical Assessment of Jute Mills by IJIRA submitted to the
Jute Commissioner, capacity utilization of 50 private jute mills mainly located in West Bengal
were covered. As per the report, number of jute mills achieving capacity utilization in the
range of 90% and above during the year 2005 stood at 33, number in the range of 80% but
below 90% at 14, number in the range of 70% but below 80% at 2 and one jute mill with
capacity utilization at 66.14%. In this assessment analysis, three major yard sticks were
used viz. (i) Machine Productivity Ratio (MPR), (ii) Machine Efficiency Index (MEI) and (iii)
Machine Utilization Index (MUI). For grading the Mills, Machine Utilization Index has been
used; whereas for assessing the Weaving performance, Machine Efficiency Index has been
used. As per findings of 54 mills by IJIRA, MPR (Machine Productivity Ratio) of 49 jute mills
stood higher of 85% and above and 5 mills are in the range of 75% to 85%. But in respect of
MUI (Machine Utilization Index), the picture is rather discouraging. MRP has been derived
with respect to standard production norms. Low MUI indicates low levels of machinery
maintenance, poor rates of replacement of old machinery and also bad management of
production at manufacturing level and less placement of qualified jute technologists at the
floor level.
1.4 As per the financial analysis made by the Office of Jute Commissioner, Govt. of India,
of 74 jute mills for period from 2001-2002 to 2004-05, on the basis of Annual reports of such
jute mills, private jute mills, excluding Govt. mills, earned profits before tax of Rs.1,055.14
lakh in the year 2002-03, Rs.3,637.05 lakh in 2003-04 and Rs.13,837.91 lakh in 2004-05,
turnover of 74 jute mills during the years 2003-04 and 2004-05 were Rs.524,725.91 lakh
and Rs.584,237.72 lakh respectively and percentage of profit to sales stood at 7.83% and
5.64% respectively during the same financial years. In case of capital formation during the
period from 2002-03 to 2004-05, net block of 74 jute mills showed a falling trend and they
were at Rs.169,698.16 lakh in 2002-03, Rs.160,025.39 lakh in 2003-04 and Rs.154,834.65
lakh in 2004-05.
41.90
17.00
46.37
20.50
42.00
17.04
41.33
12.50
33.99
16.89
35.66
14.20
43.26
17.66
36.00
15.00
2.2 It may be seen from the table 1 that the world production of jute, kenaf and allied fibres
showed an erratic trend during the period 2000-01 to 2005-06(July-June season). Although,
India continued to be the major producer of such natural fibres, its share in the world
production slipped down from 60.04% in 2000-01 to 55.73% in the year 2005-06..
Table -2 : Mill Consumption of Jute, Kenaf and Allied Fibres
Mill Cons.of five
major countries
Bangladesh
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
490.1
520.4
555.7
523.8
522.0
522.0
1627.6
(74.23)
1656.7
(73.67)
1581.9
(68.5)
1568.2
(72.45)
1630.6
(73.26)
1665.0
(73.67)
Myanmar
16.0
12.8
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.0
Nepal
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
Thailand
44.0
44.0
44.0
44.0
44.0
44.0
2192.7
2248.9
2309.6
2164.5
2225.6
2260.0
India
Total
2.3 It is evident from the table No.2 that India continues to be the major consumer in jute,
kenaf and allied fibres among the major producing countries and its share in consumption of
such natural fibres veers around above 70%.
Table -3 : World Exports of products of Jute, Kenaf and Allied Fibres
2000
2004
World
651.6
649.9
680.3
724.4
740.2
Bangladesh
378.0
409.2
400.6
391.9
439.4
11.5
11.2
11.1
15.9
16.1
177.8
(27.3)
10.0
151.0
(23.23)
10.0
189.9
(27.9)
10.0
243.8
(33.65)
10.0
193.0
(26.1)
13.0
7.2
8.3
7.3
7.9
6.3
China
India
Nepal
Thailand
2004
315.9
284.1
341.0
386.9
361.6
87.3
(27.63)
69.3
(24.39)
110.4 )
(32.37)
144.2
(37.27)
62.3
(17.23)
84.2
78.0
90.9
89.2
129.4
5.7
7.2
41.1
34.3
65.1
Thailand
42.6
38.0
15.0
36.7
17.6
Cote dIvoire
19.0
12.1
24.2
15.2
16.0
Brazil
12.1
11.0
4.0
13.8
19.4
India
Pakistan
China
2.5 The above table shows that despite being major producer of jute, kenaf and allied
fibres, India is also an important importer, next to Pakistan. Increased demand for import of
raw jute has mainly been for quality fibres mainly from Bangladesh used for production of
value-added diversified jute products.
States
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
Period: July-June
Quantity:000 Quintal
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
W. Bengal
498.6
286.2
1585.8
1335.6
561.6
187.2
Assam
203.4
86.4
288.0
207.0
18.0
45.0
Meghalaya
--
--
12.6
10.8
1.08
--
Bihar
127.8
70.2
318.6
356.4
46.8
19.8
Orissa
1.8
--
34.2
21.6
1.8
--
Uttar
Pradesh
--
--
--
--
--
--
Andhra
Pradesh
1.8
--
120.6
73.8
Neg.
--
Tripura
--
--
5.4
7.2
4.00
1.4
Total
833.4
442.8
2365.2
2012.4
633.6
253.4
Hessian
Sacking
Carpet
Backing
Others
Total
2000-01
338.0
(20.8)
952.8
(58.6)
6.6
(0.4)
327.8
(20.2)
1625.2
2001-02
275.3
(17.2)
1034.0
(64.6)
5.0
(0.3)
286.5
(17.9)
1600.8
2002-03
338.3
(20.9)
1000.0
(61.6)
4.7
(0.3)
278.8
(17.2)
1621.8
2003-04
305.2
(19.4)
979.3
(62.3)
4.7
(0.3)
282.1
(18.0)
1571.3
2004-05
310.3
(19.25)
992.0
(61.5)
4.1
(0.25)
306.7
(19.0)
1613.1
2005-06
320.0
(20.2)
1007.5
(63.7)
6.2
(0.4)
248.8
(15.7)
2006-07
(Apl.-June)
72.3
(22.4)
191.8
(59.5)
0.7
(0.2)
57.4
(17.8)
1582.2
322.2
Period
April-March
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
(Apl.-June)
Hessian
269.2
(20.6)
243.0
(16.3)
251.3
(18.3)
253.3
(18.9)
244.8
(17.5)
237.6
(17.2)
54.3
Sacking
934.8
(65.2)
1021.4
(69.9)
954.8
(69.7)
909.3
(67.7)
972.4
(69.7)
974.2
(70.7)
163.5
Carpet
Backing
Cloth
0.8
(Negl..)
0.9
(Neg.)
0.5
(Neg.)
0.9
(Neg.)
0.9
(Neg.)
0.7
(Neg.)
-
Others
229.6
(16.0)
195.5
(13.4)
167.1
(12.2)
179.4
(13.4)
176.1
(12.6)
165.3
(12.0)
41.0
Total
Domestic
Cons.
1434.4
% share of
Domestic
Cons. to
Total
Production
88.26
1460.8
91.25
1375.7
84.7
1342.9
85.46
1394.2
86.43
1377.8
87.08
258.8
Table -10 :Export of Jute Goods from India since last Six Years :
Product
1.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Hessian
Sacking
CBC*
Yarn
FGJP**
Soil Saver
JDPs ***
Total of 1 to 7
Other
Total of All Jute
Goods
11 % of Hessian to
Total Export
12 % of Yarn to
Total Export
13 % of JDPs to
Total Export
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Qty.
Value
Qty.
Value
Qty.
Value
Qty.
Value
Qty.
Value
86.0
3176.05 51.6
1873.59 100.8
3533.01 157.1 4145.90
153.7 4249.79
3.1
104.49
2.1
73.55
6.1
187.35
33.4
846.70
31.2
777.24
8.1
242.75
2.9
98.64
2.8
105.01
5.2
156.28
1.5
62.50
127.3 3406.54
77.0 2212.36
77.1 2237.65
90.6
2469.15 120.4
3365.76
14.2
432.06
5.1
179.56
23.6
673.50
6.0
97.76
4.0
61.14
9.3
126.46 10.50
130.81
6.50
93.69
1423.53
1355.07
2031.65
2232.72
2537.47
244.7 8883.19
142.6 5853.90
219.7 8894.63 296.8
9981.56 313.3 11086.45
10.5
433.69
5.6
279.32
6.3
238.58
13.6
537.21
8.5
382.58
255.2 9316.88
148.2 6133.22
226.0 9133.21 310.4 10518.77 321.8 11469.03
34
31
39
37
36
23
15
22
21
39
29
22
Value : Rs./Million
2005-06
Qty.
Value
171.6 4933.48
33.2
996.36
0.9
44.64
69.1
2394.61
4.9
72.85
3125.92
279.7 11567.86
6.1
294.59
285.8 11862.45
37
42
29
20
22
26
10
4.5 As may be seen from the above table, exports of Hessian, Jute Yarn and
Diversified Jute Products collectively constituted above 85% of total exports in terms
of value during the period from 2000-01 to 2005-06. During the same period, exports
of both Hessian and JDPs gained. Share of Hessian export has increased from 34
per cent in year 2000-01 to 42 per cent in year 2005-06, and that in JDPs has risen
to 26 per cent in the year 2005-06 from 15 per cent in the year 2000-01. Apparently,
share of Jute Yarn which is mainly used as intermediate/raw material for value added
jute products has shown a declining trend over the period from 2000-01 to 2005-06
entailing that such yarns have been used more by domestic manufacturers for
increased production of value-added JDPs in decentralized sector. Share of jute
Sacking Bags as packaging material in the export market has remained at a low level
11
Description
Value
cap
for
DEPB Entitlement
24
1.00
-----
25
1.00
--
26
a. Hessian Cloth
b. Hessian made-up
3.00
3.00
Rs.40/Kg.
Rs.55/Kg.
27
a. Sacking cloth
b. Sacking Bag
4.00
4.00
Rs.30/Kg.
Rs.40/Kg.
12
Rs.175/Kg.
37
Rs.175/Kg.
83.
116
589
3.00
4.00
519
Sewing Machinery
1.00
--
--Rs.7.0 Lakh
---
DEPB scheme in exports of jute goods was introduced in the financial year 2002-03.
It has a great impact on boosting exports of jute products since 2002-03 and
onwards.
c) JMDC Incentive Scheme (Capital Subsidy ) for modernization of Jute Industry :
Government of India, Ministry of Textiles. since July, 2002 introduced the scheme
with the objective to facilitate modernization and upgradation of technology in existing
jute mills, introducing new modernized technology in new mills in jute growing areas
having inadequate jute processing facilities and establishing of new mills located in
non-jute growing areas. Setting up modern jute mills in new locations either in jute
growing areas or non-jute growing areas having inadequate jute processing facility
will be eligible for capital subsidy @ 20% on installation of plant and machinery and
in case of other areas @15%. The ceiling of subsidy under the scheme shall be
limited to Rs. 50 lakh per claimant per year.
d) NCJD SCHEME CALLED- JUTE ENTREPRENEURS ASSISTANCE (CAPITAL
SUBSIDY) SCHEME
The main objectives of the scheme are :
Sustaining the benefits that have accrued under various programme on jute,
Increasing employment opportunities in rural and urban areas through micro
units,
To spread the production bases of jute diversified products particularly in nonjute growing areas,
Exploring new application area for jute products,
Encouraging projects on reduction of process cost to give competitive edge to
end products.
Capital subsidy under the scheme shall be @ 10% and 15% respectively according
to group of investment
13
(Rs. In crore)
Assistance Disbursed
No.
Amt.
under No.
of Amount under
Application
TUF
Applications
TUF
18
141.68
*82.78
17
74.87
Source : Website of Ministry of Textiles
*Against Rs.82.78 crore sought under TUF, an amount of Rs.80.36 crore was
made eligible under TUF
Sanction
of Project Cost
14
15
Group- A
Belgium,
Turkey,
Iran, U.S.A., &U.K
58%
Target Countries
Group-B
Egypt,
Saudi
Arabia,
Japan,
Syria -- 17%
1.
Jute Yarn
2.
Jute
Geotextiles
3.
Jute
U.S.A., Japan, Saudi Belgium, Spain,
shopping and Arabia, U.K.
UAE,
Italy,
Carry Bags
--- 39%
Germany, France
--- 27%
4.
5.
6.
7.
8..
U.S.A. -- 71%
U.K. --- 22%
Japan, Australia,
Hongkong,
MiddleEast 4%
Saudi
Arabia,
Spain, Belgium,
Germany, South
Africa 16%
New
Zealand,
Russia,
Korea,
Egypt,
U.S.A.,
Turkey -- 23%
Jute
Floor U.S.A. --- 56%
New
Zealand,
Covering
Europe --- 25%
South
Africa,
Australia, Japan,
Canada -Hessian
U.S.A, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Australia,
Belgium, U.K.
Netherlands,
Turkey,
Japan,
---- 53%
UAE, Germany,
Sudan,
Ghana,
Indonesia
--25%
Jute Sacking Sudan, Syria, Iraq, Kenya,
U.S.A.,
Bags
Indonesia,
Egypt, Australia,
--- 35%
Iran,
Belgium,
Turkey, Japan
--- 13%
Group-C
Germany,
Poland, Russia,
Netherlands
7%
Singapore,
Canada, Korea,
Malaysia,
Australia --- 3%
Turkey,
Argentina
Sweden, Czech
Rep. Singapore,
Malaysia,
Australia --- 11%
Peru, Singapore,
Costa
Rica,
Nicaragua
---- 10%
It is further stated by FAO that the International Year of Natural Fibres will raise the
consumer awareness of natural fibres and strengthen demand for natural fibre
products, improving the livelihoods of the farmers who produce them and the
revenues for countries that export them. At the same time, promoting the use of
natural fibres will improve the environment. The natural fibres include cotton, jute,
wool, silk, flax, sisal, coconut fibre and many others. These fibres are used in clothing
and other consumer goods as well as in industrial applications. The year 2009 will,
16
therefore, be a watershed for the Indian jute sector if we can pull of our socks and
grab the grand opportunity of international marketing for this environment friendly
fibre. Due diligence can bring back the golden days of the golden fibre.
Comments on this article may be sent to vaanijya.dgcis@nic.in.
Reference :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
17