Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Clinical Study
Atypical Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Depressive and
Psychotic Symptoms in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia:
A Naturalistic Study
Marco Innamorati,1 Stefano Baratta,1 Cristina Di Vittorio,1 David Lester,2 Paolo Girardi,3
Maurizio Pompili,3 and Mario Amore4
1
Division of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39/E, I-43100 Parma, Italy
The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Pomona, NJ 08240, USA
3
Mental Health and Sensory Functions, Suicide Prevention Center, SantAndrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome,
Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189 Rome, Italy
4
Department of Neurosciences, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Section of Psychiatry, University of Genova,
Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132 Genova, Italy
2
1. Introduction
Schizophrenia is a serious and disabling mental disorder
usually associated with a decline in social and occupational functioning, and deficits in communication, control of
behavior, the ability to feel pleasure, will, and initiative. The
disease affects approximately 1% of the worlds population,
or around 112 adults in every 1,000, mostly in the 1535
year-old group [13]. Yearly incidence is 1640 cases per
100,000 according to the ICD-9 criteria and 714 cases per
100,000 using more restrictive criteria [4, 5]. The risk of
2
Furthermore, depression in schizophrenic patients is
common and disabling [16, 1830], while suicide is a frequent
outcome in schizophrenia patients [17]. Back in the 1970s,
Miles [31], in a review of 34 studies, estimated that up to 10%
of schizophrenia patients die by suicide. More recently, other
studies indicated a lifetime risk ranging between 2% and 5%
[32, 33]. Furthermore, at least 50% of schizophrenia patients
attempt suicide at least once during their lifetime.
First-generation antipsychotics (e.g., chlorpromazine and
haloperidol) demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of
positive symptoms [34], but their use was associated with
a substantial risk of extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive
dyskinesia. The introduction of atypical antipsychotics in the
1990s has had a major impact on the treatment of schizophrenia. Clozapine has demonstrated superior efficacy compared
with first-generation antipsychotics and has a lower risk of
causing extrapyramidal side effects, despite a significant risk
of agranulocytosis [3540]. Today clozapine is recommended
when the illness has not responded adequately to previous
treatment despite the sequential use of adequate doses of
at least two different antipsychotic drugs, one of which is
a nonclozapine second-generation antipsychotic [41]. The
next set of drugs that were developed (e.g., risperidone,
olanzapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole) demonstrated at
least equal efficacy and better tolerability than typical antipsychotics and improved safety compared with clozapine
[34, 4256]. Nevertheless, heterogeneity in the individual
response to treatments is still the rule in schizophrenia
patients [5766], and discontinuation of treatment is a very
frequent occurrence [64, 67]. Recently, Cuyun Carter et al.
[68], analyzing the data from the United States Schizophrenia
Care and Assessment Program, reported that only 10% of the
sample had a positive outcome after two years.
Some studies have indicated that atypical antipsychotics
may be effective for the depressive symptoms accompanying
schizophrenia [40, 48, 6971] and for suicide risk [72], despite
some inconsistent results [73]. A few studies have also indicated that some atypical antipsychotics may increase awareness of their illness in schizophrenia patients [74, 75].
The aim of this naturalistic study was to investigate
whether treatment with clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics for at least 2 years was associated with a reduction
in psychotic and depressive symptoms and an improvement
in awareness into their illness in patients with chronic
schizophrenia.
3. Results
The patients had a significant reduction in positive (
4.81; ), negative ( ; ), and
general ( ; ) symptoms. The patients also
showed improvement in awareness of their illness ( ;
) and symptom attribution ( ; ).
However, our sample of patients as a whole did not improve
significantly in depressive symptoms ( ; ),
although the reduction was significant for patients with CDSS
scores of 5 and higher at baseline.
The differences between the groups are listed in Table 1.
At baseline, the groups differed in diagnosis ( ) and
age at onset ( ; ), but they did not
differ for mean years spent since diagnosis ( ;
). Furthermore, patients in the clozapine group had
more positive symptoms ( ; ) and fewer
3
Table 1: Differences between groups.
Other
antipsychotics
( )
0.07
0.50
38.48 11.45
65.2
Schizophrenia
87.0
56.5
13.0
43.5
22.91 6.88
15.17 8.11
43.5
26.22 7.20
18.57 10.74
19.6
19.6
6.5
2.2
30.4
13.0
26.1
22.87 6.82
30.65 9.24
48.61 13.10
2.78 4.02
30.4
17.83 6.83
24.70 9.72
44.96 12.02
4.50 3.85
40.9
21.91 11.24
23.74 11.14
410.87 127.88
(200/750)
5.36 5.31
26.1
13.0
8.43 8.88
4.78 11.07
8.96 17.23
0.48 5.29
71.4
6.71 6.85
7.81 7.41
45.39 12.16
69.6
Test
Age (M SD)
Men (%)
Diagnosis (%)
Clozapine
( )
16.95 10.27
17.05 11.32
0.05
0.26
0.27
0.23
0.05
0.07
0.34
0.05
0.34
0.10
0.054
4.70 2.22
21.7
0.66
0.50
6.70 7.56
6.87 10.57
13.39 17.32
2.05 4.50
60.0
231.00
0.24
0.46
0.47
0.05
0.52
17.4
7.92 4.96
6.62 3.93
Response had been defined as a 50% change of baseline scores for patients with a CDSS score of 5 and higher at the baseline.
0.05
0.50
0.29
0.97
4
atypical antipsychotics, when we limited our analyses only
to depressed patients, other antipsychotics were no longer
superior to clozapine, which demonstrated nonsignificantly
higher rates of remission.
The groups did not differ in the mean change in positive
symptoms ( ; ), negative symptoms (
231.00; ), and general symptoms ( ;
0.47) as measured with the PANSS; and they did not differ in
change in the SUMD awareness ( ; ) and
the SUMD symptom attribution ( ; ).
Lastly, the change from baseline in depressive symptoms
was not associated with the change in the SUMD awareness
(rho = 0.15; ) or symptom attribution (rho =
0.17; ) dimensions. Reduction in depressive symptoms was associated only with a change in PANSS general
symptoms score (rho =0.56; ), and not with
changes in negative (rho = 0.15; ) or positive (rho =0.23; ) symptoms. Furthermore, a
reduction in depression was associated with higher scores
on the PANSS negative symptoms at baseline (rho =0.42;
) and with lower CDSS scores at baseline (rho =
0.66; ). Thus, a greater reduction in depressive
symptoms was predicted by lower depression and higher
negative symptoms at baseline, and these results did not
change when we considered only patients with CDSS scores
of 5 and higher.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interests for this research.
Authors Contribution
All authors have made substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data, have been involved in drafting the paper
or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and
have given final approval of the version to be published.
References
[1] World Health Organisation, Schizophrenia, vol. 2012, World
Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
5
[20] J. H. Kim, J. H. Ann, and M. J. Kim, Relationship between
improvements of subjective well-being and depressive symptoms during acute treatment of schizophrenia with atypical
antipsychotics, Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics,
vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 172178, 2011.
6
[37] G. Foussias and G. Remington, Antipsychotics and schizophrenia: from efficacy and effectiveness to clinical decision-making,
Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 117125, 2010.
[38] T. C. Manschreck, D. A. Redmond, S. F. Candela, and B.
A. Maher, Effects of clozapine on psychiatric symptoms,
cognition, and functional outcome in schizophrenia, Journal
of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 11, no. 4, pp.
481489, 1999.
[39] M. Bourin, B. Guitton, E. Dailly, P. Hery, and P. Jolliet, A followup study of a population of schizophrenic patients treated with
clozapine, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological
Psychiatry, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 14811495, 2001.
[40] J. A. Lieberman, G. Tollefson, M. Tohen et al., Comparative
efficacy and safety of atypical and conventional antipsychotic
drugs in first-episode psychosis: a randomized, double-blind
trial of olanzapine versus haloperidol, The American Journal of
Psychiatry, vol. 160, no. 8, pp. 1396404, 2003.
[41] National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, The NICE
Guideline on Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Adults in Primary and Secondary
Care, The British Psychological Society and the Royal College
of Psychiatrists, London, UK, 2010.
[42] M. Dossenbach, C. Arango-Davila, H. S. Ibarra et al., Response
and relapse in patients with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or haloperidol: 12-month followup of the Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health
Outcomes (IC-SOHO) study, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry,
vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 10211030, 2005.
[43] M. Dossenbach, A. Erol, M. E. M. Kessaci et al., Effectiveness
of antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia: interim 6-month
analysis from a prospective observational study (IC-SOHO)
comparing olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and haloperidol, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 312321,
2004.
[44] H. G. El-Sayeh, C. Morganti, and C. E. Adams, Aripiprazole for
schizophrenia: systematic review, British Journal of Psychiatry,
vol. 189, pp. 102108, 2006.
[45] D. Novick, J. M. Haro, D. Suarez, E. Vieta, and D. Naber,
Recovery in the outpatient setting: 36-month results from the
Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (SOHO) study,
Schizophrenia Research, vol. 108, no. 13, pp. 223230, 2009.
[46] J. Geddes, N. Freemantle, P. Harrison, and P. Bebbington, Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: systematic
overview and meta-regression analysis, British Medical Journal,
vol. 321, no. 7273, pp. 13711376, 2000.
[47] S. Leucht, G. Pitschel-Walz, D. Abraham, and W. Kissling, Efficacy and extrapyramidal side-effects of the new antipsychotics
olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and sertindole compared
to conventional antipsychotics and placebo. A meta-analysis of
randomized controlled trials, Schizophrenia Research, vol. 35,
no. 1, pp. 5168, 1999.
[48] S. C. Schulz, R. Thomson, and M. Brecher, The efficacy of
quetiapine vs. haloperidol and placebo: a meta-analytic study of
efficacy, Schizophrenia Research, vol. 62, no. 1-2, pp. 112, 2003.
[49] S. Caccia, L. Pasina, and A. Nobili, New atypical antipsychotics
for schizophrenia: iloperidone, Drug Design, Development and
Therapy, no. 4, pp. 3348, 2010.
[50] K. Salimi, L. F. Jarskog, and J. A. Lieberman, Antipsychotic
drugs for first-episode schizophrenia: a comparative review,
CNS Drugs, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 837855, 2009.
[51] M. Riedel, N. Muller, M. Stradding, I. Spellmann, E. Severus,
and H. J. Moller, Quetiapine in the treatment of schizophrenia
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
[57]
[58]
[59]
[60]
[61]
[62]
[63]
[64]
[65]
[66]