Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2. Upcoming of the idea of the step sequences. Next obvious sequence of construction of
Europe was the political Union and in 1980s politics like Mitterand and Kohl started the
idea of working on European citizens and policies.
3. In 1999 collapse of the Berlin wall and the capitalistic and Anglo-Saxon vision of the
world. The last 20 years, the neoliberal economic project invaded completely Europe.
No politics, lobbysation, never ending enlargement of benefits. So in this period it was
impossible to advance in the democratization of Europe.
4. Patience is required, 1996 the Euro started. Thats when Franck Biancheri started seeing
a good wind / wave to surf and started saying that the euro will change completely
everything. Transform the project of European construction.
5. He was looking for upcoming winds to move the boat in the direction of democracy, and
the crisis was only interesting to him in the sense to help him to downgrade all this
capitalistic economic model and come back to the move of having political dimension
to the European project and the euro as a tool to integrate a group of countries with
high common interests and so that is really a good example of having a goal, the harbor
trying to do things even though the winds are adverse. And he always tried to surf
waves. And finally identifying the big waves to put the boat in the right direction.
The PA method, as a tool for decisions makers, was very ahead to his time, because the leaders
20 years ago didnt want a common political future. The political dimension of Europe was
limited to Anglo-Saxon interests. This means also, to democratize PA is the other story to
democratize Europe. Franck Biancheri and LEAP decided to present the method as a heavy
powerful tool to help people to empower themselves, in order that they can build their own
common goal. They can do as Franck Biancheri and LEAP decided and built their own future. It
could be interesting to describe the future of the use of PA to animate in Europe the political
debate among citizens to enlighten political debates. When citizens dont understand any more
where they are going to, they become extremely dangerous, as we are seeing today. Its a fact
that in certain theories of crossing, we are running high risks to go in the wrong direction. And
indeed PA is supposed also to provide a tool to manage and to reach a kind of understanding of
the situations besides the fact that in terms of hard crisis, indicators are not trust worthy any
more, politicians are not enlightening any more, media are out of subject and so what can a
citizen do, to maintain some kind of understanding of the situations and avoid going in the
direction of believing the first populist. PA is a matter of democracy.
PA applied on business and different sectors works similar: the global crisis is probably the
biggest system we can think off now, and a company is linked to the global happening but on a
smaller scale. Having enlightened workers and a capable leader is also necessary to run properly
a business.
There is some problematic in specific businesses or sectors for the application of the PA method:
For example in technology: partnerships between a company and some chosen technology
providers. There is a process to choose the technology provider, but what criteria is applied: you
can choose them by the products or by the quality of technology. Finally in all the cases the
companies are choosing the partners because of other and political reasons, not based on the
technological field at all. For example, partners are chosen because they are Americans and not
because of quality or the tool they provide. If you want to dig on this question you have to be
careful on who in the company is selecting the partners. The company by itself doesnt make
sense but the companies as customers, partners or provider - with the whole ecosystem. You
have to deal with who is taking decisions. The partnership is divided in special departments
involved in personal relations. A company itself is not enough. Between CEOs they decide to
do things together, so that social personal relations or other companies are engaged on this. It
may be because of political reasons and a lack of confidence in knowledge with Chinese vendors.
For example its very different and its understandable that western companies are not
understanding the way to make business with Chinese companies for instance. In this case its
not only a political reason but also a cultural one.
In PA the sources used are usually public like TV, newspaper, Internet, etc. In Business domain,
there are some specialized publications or papers with articles by the industry, but normally
there are few publications publicly available, professional expensive publications, and they are
not so read. Even by the peoples industry itself. That will give more details about a specific
market, but this publications will always have a politically correct message, you will never see
some kind of message that will go against the authorized mindset, for instance in many countries
its a matter of facts that corruptions is a main factor of decision for business and particularly
linked with the public projects. People engaged in the business will take into account this
element because its a reality but you will never see a complete work or analysis about this
corruption because its absolutely forbidden. So you have to know that its a trend that will give
a direction to the market, with cultural factors, economic trends, etc.
The relevance for decision makers has less impact in the decision making. The topic to build a
PA based on articles in business can use the same method but with different writing depending
on the size of the company, different parameters not taken into account in PA, size of the
business, size of the country,etc.. In France in business if you compare companies with 500 or
5000 people theres a great difference because the structures insight the companies are more
complex. The decision making process is different.
There are some topics which imply to decide not to be managed with PA, because it can be
considered that theres some kind of black box, or the decisions are made by few people, so we
are not able to know exactly what they are going to decide upon of what factor of decision.
When the first unexpected event comes, you have a whole system that gets organized around
this indicators, reactions we can compare this black box with the situation that you are in a
tunnel and the GPS will only imagine where you are going. Thats why its difficult to anticipate
further events or upcoming events, but still its interesting to work in the general direction, and
of course it becomes difficult to date things, to see how long the system will manage to heal the
system, its like a car entering in a tunnel and the GPS just imagine where the car is. Thats the
idea of a black box. Theres still work to do.