Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
09/01/2015
o
Ray Monk The Duty of Genius
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
This is Freges philosophy of language applied to metaphysics
Language is the key to metaphysics
That language is logic
Language makes certain things inexpressible
The sentence is the primary element of language
On Denoting
Philosophical Investigations
When something presents itself as a philosophical problem, we find
that it is actually the result of a malfunctioning of language
Wittgenstein claims that Frege was wrong about their being two
types of force involved in the use of language
A systematic theory of speech acts cannot be done (because it
would be like making a systematic theory of human action)
At the bottom of a system of language there must be things which
actually exist (Wittgensteins objects are primary elements of
language)
Terms like Excalibur (the fictional sword)
o To Frege, these terms have no referents, but real senses
o To Wittgenstein, instead of just saying that Frege solved the
problem, he says that many things can go on when a term has
no reference (there is no general solution to this question)
43. For a large class of casesthough not for allis which we
employ the word meaning it can be defined thus: the meaning of
a word is its use in the language.
Psychoanalysis of the fetishization of logic
90. We feel as if we had to penetrate phenomena: our
investigation, however, is directed not towards phenomena, but, as
one might say, towards the possibilities of phenomena.
Philosophy is not a language game (so we should stop doing it
immediately)
The meaning of a proposition is not in the mind, but in the use.
Thus the search for an absolute logical structure is a fetish, which is
pursued by those who believe that meaning exists outside of use.
Of course language can function even if there are uncertainties
inherent to some specific instances of language use.
It isnt so dangerous to have a logical flaw in the system if we can
isolate and bypass the inconsistency (Russells paradox in response
to Freges system), rather than allowing the entire system to
collapse.
Proposition 125, paragraph 5: The civil status of a contradiction, or
its status in civil life: there is a the philosophical problem.
o Contradiction between the absolute sovereignty of the EU vs.
Danish legal systems (a language game in itself).
o Frege/Russell would say that the entire system collapses
Were actually back to Freges initial criticism that meaning does not
exist in the mental realm
We have much more complex terminology, but have gone full circle
o
o We ought to try to make do with the two worlds that we know
to exist, the Physical and Mental, and only appeal to new
ontologies if we absolutely have to
o Is this possible?
o A modest theory of meaning
Snow is white is true iff its true
It does not account for what it means for snow to be white
o
o Sne er hvid means that sne er hvid
o Snow is white means that snow is white
o Snow is white is true iff snow is white
o
o Discussion: Dummett will insist that understand a sentence is
to be able to perform a test on the sentence that either
verifies/confirms it or falsifies it. For these analogies (e.g.
God, backwards time travel, dark side of the moon) not to be
illusions they must contain a recipe about how to analyze
them.
o
o How to you get to a notion of a proof from a given iteration of
a sentence.
o
o Why does Dummett focus so much on verification rather than
other considerations. (Dummett needs a little bit more
Heidegger)
o
o Dummetts theory of meaning shows that we will have to give
up certain linguistic intuitions (modify the way we think of and
use language)
o