Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
AbstractThis paper presents the development of a cosimulation platform of ac drives control systems. Two studies are
performed, one for an induction motor (IM) and the second one
for a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drive. The
studies provide advanced modeling and simulation tools for ac
machines designers and the developers of electric drives control
systems allowing them to model the individual components using
the appropriate software and finally integrate all into one
common simulation platform environment. In this work, the
electric machine model is developed using JMAG software based
on finite element analysis (FEA), whereas the power electronic
converter and drive control models are built in SimulinkMATLAB. The proposed simulation platform allows a coupled
analysis that links FEA machine model with the external drive
control system for a more realistic simulation, analysis and
validation.
Index TermsCo-simulation,
Simulink
electric
motors,
JMAG,
I. INTRODUCTION
1295
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
Fig. 2. Magnetic flux density distribution and flux lines- induction motor
model: (a) normal operating conditions; (b) fault short between two phases.
1296
10
V_s *
usu
Vu
is_uv w
usv
Vv
thetam
Vw
wm
Tm
Te
Vc*
Iu,v,w
Boost
volt
w_r *
num(s)
2*pi*freq
Speed
Ref
w_sl *
-K- Va / wsyn
w_e *
rad to deg
1
s
rpm to
-Krad/s
usc
3-phase PWM
Voltage Fed Inverter
-Krad/s
to rpm
TL
JMAG_RT_Ind Motor
n_rpm
(b)
Fig. 3. Current density distribution induction motor model:
(a) Normal operating conditions; (b) Fault short between two phases.
(a)
-KVd/2
1
usu
-K-
(b)
-K-
Vc*
sqrt(2) x Vc
3
3
-C-
-K-
3
3
sin
usv
em
-K-
3
usc
theta_e*
-K-
V_tri
-Vd/2
-K-
(c)
1297
n_rpm
Load
Torque
(a)
theta
theta_e*
P-I
w_r
-K-
Torques
(a)
(b)
(b)
(a)
(b)
Fig. 9. Interior permanent magnet synchronous machine, JMAG simulation
for normal operating conditions: (a) Magnetic flux density and flux lines (b)
Current density.
1298
Va
V_s *
is_abc
Vs*
2*pi*fc
Speed
Command
w_e *
theta_e*
1
s
teta_e *
v a*
v b*
-K- Va/wsyn
Iabc
Vb
v c*
wm_rpm
Command signals
generation
Vc
n(rpm)
3-phase PWM
Voltage Fed Inverter
Tm
Te
Torque
coilTemp
293
T emp
LdLq
magTemp
L_dq
IPM_SynMot_JMAG_RT
Fig. 10. Co-Simulation JMAG-Simulink of the V/f control of the PMSM test
drive.
where the developed simulation platform is allowing the cosimulation of the electric machine advanced model based on
finite elements analysis using ANSYS Maxwell [4], with the
power electronics and the drive's electromechanical parts
modeled using ANSYS Simplorer and the ac drive control
system built in Simulink/MATLAB. By comparing this study
with the work performed in [5], I found that the JMAG user
interface is the best with a flexible JMAG-Designer
environment by solving different cases from the same base
model. Maxwell users have to have other ANSYS (Ansoft)
products such as RMxprt and Simplorer [4] which I found not
so easy to use for co-simulation.
The future extended work will be the use of the data
generated by the developed co-simulation platforms for their
post processing using the advanced virtual reality visualization
and simulation technologies installed at Purdue University
Calumet in the Center for Innovation through Visualization
and Simulation, thereby providing an intuitive understanding
of simulation results to help the design optimization of the ac
machines and drives as well as for education and training
purposes.
REFERENCES
[1]
(a)
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
(b)
[6]
[7]
(c)
Fig. 11. Simulation results of the control system in Fig. 10:
(a) Stator currents; (b) Torque; (c) Inductances Ld and Lq.
IV. CONCLUSION
The FEA machine models exported to Simulink for more
realistic tests of the control algorithms offer the obvious
advantage of low cost simulations compared with costly and
unsafe physical system prototype testing. Tests have a degree
of danger increasing the costs that are incurred, like the motor
operated under abnormal conditions (i.e., short circuits), or the
drive forced to the maximum rotation speed. The biggest
disadvantage is the time required for the co-simulation and
this is caused by performing the FEA model calculations using
the time step for the control system simulation.
An alternative approach to this study was presented in [5],
1299