Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
H* (Dimensionless head)
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
0
0.01
E [%] (Efficiency)
water 15/09
80
water 30/09
70
60
13-16% 23/09
50
13-16% 23/09
23-25% 24/09
40
23-25% 24/09
34-35% 28/09
30
20
34-35% 28/09
water 15/09
water 30/09
10
0.02
(Dimensionless
flow rate)
Q*
0
0
0.01
0.02
Q*
(Dimensionless
flow rate)
water 30/09
80
water 09/10
70
12-14% 02/10
25-27% 06/10
34-35% 07/10
44-45% 09/10
0.01
0.02
Q*
(Dimensionless
flow rate)
E [%] (Efficiency)
water 30/09
water 09/10
60
12-14% 02/10
50
40
25-27% 06/10
34-35% 07/10
30
20
44-45% 09/10
10
0
0
0.01
0.02
Q*
(Dimensionless
flow rate)
H* (Dimensionless head)
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
water 09/03
water 11/03
6-7% 10/03
17-19% 10/03
0.01
0.02
Q*
80
water 09/03
70
water 11/03
60
6-7% 10/03
50
17-19% 10/03
40
30% 10/03
30
30% 10/03
42% 10/03
20
42% 10/03
(Dimensionless
flow rate)
10
0
0
0.01
0.02
Q*
(Dimensionless
flow rate)
concentration of 44-45% of the medium sand are located a little higher than the curve. This
means that the power ratio, defined as Pr = Pm/(Sm*Pw), where Pm and Pw are power
requirements for slurry service and water service, respectively, and Sm the slurry relative
density, remains unity (see Table 1). In other words, the power consumption at the same flow
rate increases directly with the relative density of the slurry. For the coarse sand, however, Pr
> 1 holds at moderate and high concentrations. At 42% (Sm =1.7), the average power
requirement Pm for slurry service of the coarse sand is 1.45 times larger than (Sm*Pw) and 2.5
times larger than Pw the power requirement for clear water (Table 1).
P* (Dimensionless power)
P* (Dimensionless power)
P* (Dimensionless power)
3.50E-06
3.50E-06
13-16% 23/09
0.01
0.02
1.50E-06
44-45% 09/10
5.00E-07
(Dimensionless
flow rate)
Q*
17-19% 10/03
30% 10/03
34-35% 07/10
34-35% 28/09
6-7% 10/03
2.50E-06
25-27% 06/10
23-25% 24/09
5.00E-07
water 11/03
12-14% 02/10
2.50E-06
1.50E-06
water 09/03
water 09/10
water 30/09
2.50E-06
3.50E-06
water 30/09
water 15/09
0.01
0.02
Q*
(Dimensionless
flow rate)
1.50E-06
42% 10/03
5.00E-07
0
0.01
0.02
Q*
(Dimensionless
flow rate)
24-25%
Medium sand
15%
21-25%
Coarse sand
30%
13-16% Fine
sand
13-16% Fine
sand
10%
20%
25% Medium
sand + 10%
Fine sand
5%
0%
25% Coarse
sand + 10%
Fine sand
10%
0%
10
20
30
40
50
Cvd [%]
10
20
30
40
50
Cvd [%]
flow stratification under changing velocity Vm while the medium-sand slurry behaves
regularly with less stratification. Although flow velocities in a pipeline are much smaller than
velocities in a pump, it is believed that slurry flow through pump passages between vanes
may experience similar stratification due to impeller rotation instead of gravitational
sedimentation in a horizontal pipe. Earlier results have shown that the effects of
concentration, particle size and fine particle content on characteristics of a slurry pump have
great similarities to those on flow behaviour in a pipeline (Wilson 1997). Adding the fine
sand to a coarse-slurry may increase the capability of the carrier liquid, formed by water and
the fine sand, to carry coarse particles. As a result, the flow stratification and the coarseparticle trajectory deviation from the liquid streamline due to inertia in a pump decrease.
Since the coarse sand has larger inertia than the medium sand and exhibits stronger flow
stratification, the favourable effect due to the fine sand on head reduction factor and
efficiency factor becomes more significant.
0.4
Im (Hydraulic gradient)
Im (Hydraulic gradient)
0.4
water
0.3
water
0.3
11-13%
0.2
13-16%
0.2
25-26%
0.1
23-24%
0.1
9 Vm [m/s]
Vm [m/s]
Fig.4 Hydraulic gradient versus mean slurry velocity in the horizontal 150 mm pipe
4. CONCLUSIONS
1.
2.
3.
Sand size has a strong influence on characteristics of the slurry pump. For the fine and
medium sand the head reduction equals to the efficiency reduction until Cvd=35%. This
is different from the existing conclusion. While for the coarse sand, the turning-point
concentration is only 15%, above which the efficiency drops faster than the head.
Particle size distribution is very important in determining slurry pump characteristics. A
mixture composed of broader grading solids exhibits smaller resistance in a slurry pump.
The fine sand can lessen the flow stratification and thus improve the performance.
A significant improvement on pump performance was observed by adding the fine sand
to the coarse sand. This is because the coarse sand slurry exhibits stronger stratification.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The study is supported by the MOE Supporting Program for National University Key
Teachers and the MOE Visiting Scholars Research Fund (P.R. China).
REFERENCES
1. Sellgren, A. and Vappling, L. (1986). Effects of highly concentrated slurries on the performance of
centrifugal pumps. Proceedings International Symposium on Slurry Flows, FED Vol. 38, ASME,
USA, pp.143-148.
2. Wilson, K.C., Addie, G.R. Sellgren, A. and Clift, R. (1997). Slurry Transport Using Centrifugal Pumps,
Blackie Academic and Professional.
3. Ni, F. and Matousek, V. (1999). Flow of aqueous mixture of sand composed of fractions of different
particle size, Proc. Hydrotransport 14, BHRG, Maastricht, The Netherlands, pp.31-43.