Modern Railway Track

PREFACE

Modern Railway Track

Coenraad Esveld

Digital Edition 2014

Version 3.1
i

Modern Railway Track

PREFACE

Modern Railway Track

Digital Edition 2014, version 3.1

Coenraad Esveld
Emeritus Professor of Railway Engineering
Delft University of Technology
Director of Esveld Consulting Services

This digital version of Modern Railway Track is published by

MRT-Productions
A subsidiary of Esveld Consulting Services BV

ISBN 978-1-326-05172-3
SISO 696.3 UDC 625.1
Copyright 2001/2014 C. Esveld
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the
material is concerned, specifically the right of translation, copying, reprinting, re-use of
illustrations, recitations, broadcastings, reproduction on microfilm or in other ways, and storage
in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is only permitted under the Dutch
Copyright Law.
The digital version 3 can be bought via www.esveld.com. The paper version of the second
edition can also be ordered from www.esveld.com.
MRT-Productions - Groenwal 25 - NL-5301 JJ Zaltbommel - The Netherlands
Tel.: +31 6 543 683 60. Email: mrt@esveld.com
Internet: www.esveld.com

ii

Modern Railway Track

PREFACE

Preface to the Digital Edition

After more than 10 years, and with the upcoming digital techniques, I considered it the right
time to publish a digital version of this book. The present edition MRT-3 is just a digital copy of
the original version of the Second edition, with all errata corrected and with some minor
updates.
It is my intension to update the book in the next couple of years to the actual state of
technology, with emphasis on weld treatment and slab track. But also contact mechanics, track
components and the new EN standards will be treated. That digital version will be published as
MRT-4
It would be very much appreciated if the readers of this book will suggest any improvements or
enhancements. Please dont hesitate to contact me at coenraad@esveld.com. Actual
information can be found on www.esved.com under the heading Modern Railway Track. At the
heading Downloads and then Additional Downloads you can find pdf files of my lectures,
conference presentations and a basic railway course in Dutch.
Autumn 2014,
Coenraad Esveld

iii

Modern Railway Track

PREFACE

10.4.4 Thermit welding ............................................................................................. 345

10.4.5 Cooling rates.................................................................................................. 350
10.4.6 Improvement of weld geometry....................................................................... 352
10.4.7 Weld geometry standards ............................................................................... 352
10.5 Rail failures .......................................................................................................... 353
10.5.1 Defects in rail ends ......................................................................................... 353
10.5.2 Defects away from rail ends ............................................................................ 354
10.5.3 Weld and resurfacing defects .......................................................................... 360
10.5.4 Rail defect statistics ........................................................................................ 363
11 SWITCHES AND CROSSINGS ....................................................................................... 370
11.1 The standard turnout ............................................................................................ 370
11.1.1 Set of switches ............................................................................................... 371
11.1.2 Common crossing ........................................................................................... 372
11.1.3 Closure rail .................................................................................................... 374
11.1.4 Rails and sleepers in turnouts .......................................................................... 374
11.2 Geometry of the turnout ....................................................................................... 374
11.3 High-speed turnouts ............................................................................................. 375
11.3.1 General ......................................................................................................... 375
11.4 Vehicle dynamic ................................................................................................... 375
11.4.1 Examples of modern high-speed turnouts ......................................................... 376
11.5 Notations used for switches and crossings .............................................................. 377
11.6 Types of turnouts and crossings ............................................................................ 377
11.7 Cross-overs .......................................................................................................... 379
11.8 Switch calculation ................................................................................................. 382
11.8.1 Relation between curve radius and crossing angle ............................................. 382
11.8.2 Calculation of main dimensions........................................................................ 384
11.8.3 Geometrical design of switches and crossings ................................................... 385
11.9 Production, transport and laying of switches ........................................................... 386
12 TRACK MAINTENANCE AND RENEWAL ......................................................................... 387
12.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 387
12.2 General maintenance aspects ................................................................................ 388
12.3 Spot maintenance of track geometry ...................................................................... 388
12.4 Rail grinding and reprofiling .................................................................................. 390
12.4.1 Rail grinding machines .................................................................................... 390
12.4.2 Rail reprofiling machines ................................................................................. 392
xv

Modern Railway Track

1 INTRODUCTION

carrying cable
(movable)

carrying cable (fixed)

H- profile

8.50+ BS

8.60+ BS
7.02+ BS

5.50+ BS

5.50+ BS
contact wire (movable)

contact wire (movable) )

2.85

4.00

2.85
BS

Catenary system via portal structure: V 140 km/h

BS

Catenary system via rotating lever: V > 140 km/h

Figure 1.2: Catenary systems: fixed and flexible suspension

The contact line should be kept at a constant tension for a good and continuous contact with
the pantograph which is pushed against the wire by means of springs. The tension is obtained
by weights or by means of gas cylinders at the end of the wire. Given the material of the wire
(copper), the length of the wire (about 1500 m), and temperature fluctuations, length variations
appear of about 50 cm. It is therefore of importance that the suspension points of the wires are
able to move with the expanding and contracting wire.
Regarding this two catenary systems can be distinguished:
a. fixed suspension: for instance portal structures (Figure 1.2, left picture),
b. flexible suspension: for instance poles (Figure 1.2, right picture)
With a. the portals and carrying cables are fixed to each other. Because of this the carrying
cables sag a little with warm weather and hence the contact wire as well. With b. the poles and
carrying cables are fastened to each other flexibly. The cantilevers of the poles are movable and
will change along with the carrying cables when temperature changes. The contact wire can
now stay completely flat. The single pole structure is used with speeds of 140 km/h and higher.
At lower speeds portal structures can be used.
Concerning metro systems the so-called third rail takes care of the supply of the current. This
rail is installed next to the two rails carrying and guiding the train. Because of this no catenary
system is necessary. This leads to a smaller clearance and therefore a smaller and cheaper
tunnel construction is possible. When crossing over metro lines, the required height under the
bridge can be lower. However, people should always be kept away from this third rail; the track
should be inaccessible and without level crossings.
8

Modern Railway Track

1 INTRODUCTION

Tracks and switches are

Fastening system
assets which will last for
Axle load = 225 kN max.
Sleeper
quite some years. The
Concrete or Wood
choice of a particular
track system and the
Spacing 0.6 m
Rail st = 900 N/mm
decision to use this
system on certain lines,
therefore,
generally
involves
a
decision
25 - 30 cm ballast (crushed stone 30/60)
which will hold good for
10 cm gravel
20
to
50
years.
Consequently,
such
Subgrade
decisions must be taken
with the future in mind,
however difficult it may
Figure 1.8: Conventional track structure
be to make a valid
prediction. The only
sure factor is that a certain degree of objectivity must be maintained vis--vis the present day
situation, and not too much emphasis placed on random everyday events.
When choosing a track system, the above-mentioned requirements must all be given due
consideration and it is clearly necessary to form some idea of the axle loads and maximum
speeds to be expected in the decades to come. After this the situation regarding the various
track components, such as rails, sleepers, fastenings, switches, and ballast should be examined
so that the optimum track design is obtained.
1.6.2 Load-bearing
function of the track
The purpose of track is
to transfer train loads
to
the
formation.
Conventional track still
in use consists of a
discrete system made
up of rails, sleepers,
and ballastbed. Figure
1.8 shows a principle
sketch with the main
dimensions.

Axle:

P = 200 kN

Wheel: Q = 100 kN
area
AH = 1 cm

level

Mean stress
(under rail 50 %)

Wheel/rail

H = 100000 N/cm

Ars = 200 cm Rail/rail pad = 250 N/cm

rs
/baseplate
Abs = 750 cm Baseplate
bs = 70 N/cm
/sleeper
Asb = 1500 cm Sleeper
sb = 30 N/cm
/ballastbed
10000 cm Ballastbed
= 5 N/cm
/substructure

Load transfer works on

the principle of stress
reduction, which means
layer by layer, as
Figure 1.9: Principle of load transfer
depicted schematically
in Figure 1.9. The
greatest stress occurs between wheel and rail and is in the order of 30 kN/cm2 (= 300 MPa).

15

Modern Railway Track

2 WHEEL-RAIL INTERFACE

2 WHEEL-RAIL INTERFACE
2.1 Wheel-rail guidance
A rail vehicle basically consists of a body supported by secondary suspension on bogies in which
the wheelsets are mounted and damped by means of primary suspension. Track guidance of
the wheel is achieved in principle by making the following two provisions:

The tires are conical instead of cylindrical which means that in straight track a centering
force is exerted on the wheelset if there is slight lateral displacement. The centering
effect promotes a better radial adjustment of the wheelset in curves. This leads to more
rolling, less slipping and hence less wear.
The tires have flanges on the inside of the track to prevent derailment. In case of more
considerable lateral displacement both in curves and on switches, the lateral clearance
between wheelset and track is often no longer sufficient to restrict lateral displacements
adequately by means of the restoring mechanism previously discussed. Should the
wheel flange touch the rail head face, this can result in high lateral forces and wear.

2.2 Wheelset and track dimensions

Generally the track gauge is used as a distance measured between the two rails, more
specifically the distance between the inside of the railheads measured 14 mm below the surface
of the rail. By choosing 14 mm the measurement is less influenced by lipping or lateral wear on
the rail head and by the radius r = 13 mm of the rail head face. On normal track the gauge is
1435+10-3 mm with a maximum gradient of 1:300. For new track, however, NS apply the
following standards:

Mean gauge per 200 m: 1435+3-1 mm

Standard deviation within a 200 m section less than 1 mm.
Mean wheel circle

14

10

Track width

1:20 (1:40)
Inclination

70 mm
Track width 1500 (nominal)

+3/3

Flange gauge

Inside gauge 1360

Track gauge

Flange gauge 1426

+0/16
+10/3

Track gauge 1435

Track distance 4.00 4.50 m

Figure 2.1: Wheelset and track dimensions for straight normal gauge track

17

Modern Railway Track

2 WHEEL-RAIL INTERFACE

Here r1 - r2 is the instantaneous difference in rolling

radius of the wheel treads; generally speaking this is a
non-linear function of the lateral displacement y of the
wheelset with respect to the central position. The
difference between conical and worn profiles is given in
Figure 2.7. To enable numerical comparisons e is at a
certain lateral displacement y y=.
With a conical profile the conicity is constant and (2.8)
becomes (see also):

( +

)(

r = r1 - r2

Worn profile

Conic profile
y

2e

(2. 9)
y

In the next paragraph the effects resulting from

progressive non-linear behavior of the effective conicity
and its influence on the running stability of vehicles and
rail wear are dealt with in greater detail.

2.6 Worn wheel profiles

Flangeway clearance

Figure 2.7: y-r curves. Difference between conical and

worn wheel profiles

A perfectly conical wheel profile is

unstable as far as its shape is concerned,
but will take on a shape that is stable as
the effect of wear. In addition, conical
profiles have the disadvantage that a
substantial lateral movement will, because
of the two-point contact, lead directly to
an impact. If the profile of the rail and
wheel tire at the point of contact is
assumed to be circular, it can be deduced
from
Figure 2.8 that in the case of lateral
displacement y of the wheelset with
respect to the track, the contact point on
the rail will over a distance translate to:

(2. 10)

Moreover, if the value of y is small

compared to the radii, the following
relationship holds true:

= tan

2 =

r
r

w r

r = radius of rail
w = radius of wheel

Figure 2.8: Displacement of contact point on rail due to wheelset

displacement

(2. 11)
22

Modern Railway Track

2 WHEEL-RAIL INTERFACE

give a stable equilibrium, but will instead induce a highly frequent jumping to and fro between
two points on the curve.
2.7.6 Spin
Apart from slip in the
longitudinal
and
lateral
direction a third quantity also
exists: the so-called spin which
also
participates
in
transmitting the friction force.
Spin or rotational slip arises if
the
small
contact
area
between wheel and rail is not
parallel to the rotation axis of

Rotation Vector

Force on Rail

Rolling
Spin

Running direction

Wheel

Force on Wheel

the wheelset. The rotation

Figure 2.23: Effect of spin
vector of the wheelset can
then be decomposed in a
component parallel to the contact area (this is pure rolling), and a component perpendicular to
it, which is the rotational slip or spin as indicated in Figure 2.23.
The spin is defined as:

sin

sin

(2. 16)

y
Slip

Adhesion

It should be noted that the spin has a

dimension [1/m].

Leading

edge

When spin takes place, the relative

movements between wheel and rail will
also partly be taken up by elastic distortion
and partly by slip. The result will be that in
the contact area forces are generated with
varying magnitude and direction, the
resultant of which produce a force in the
lateral direction. This can be clarified by
means of Figure 2.24.
In this picture, which was used in
numerical considerations about contact
mechanics, the contact ellipse is divided
into a grid of small elements. Each element
shows the magnitude and direction of the
slip regarding that element.

dy

dx

Figure 2.24: Origination of pure spin

30

Modern Railway Track

9 SLAB TRACK

After adjustment, the rail is made stress free by means of heating before the compound is
poured into the groove (Figure 9.52).
9.8.3 Experiences with embedded rail
Many pilot tracks of embedded rail have been applied over the last 30 years, 246 m paved-in as
well as main-line track. Nearby Deurne (The Netherlands) in 1976, a pilot was constructed in
heavily used track with speeds up to 160 km/h. The track existed of a series of 6 meters of
prefabricated slabs containing the gullies supported underneath with old NP46 rails [201]. The
experiences were qualified as positive. In 1994, the rails were renewed, but the wear of those
rails was considerably less compared to the adjacent track.
Another large pilot concerned 3 km track nearby Best (The Netherlands) which came into
operation in October 1999 and is currently being monitored.
The superstructure consists of a 42 cm thick slab with longitudinal reinforcement providing the
slab with a high flexural strength. The slab lies on top of a concrete road bed and stabilized
subsoil. The cross section of this track structure is shown in Figure 9.48, while the construction
process of this test track is illustrated in Figure 9.49 up to and including Figure 9.54.
Embedded Rail
0.6 m

Concrete slab

Sand bed
2.5 m
Figure 9.48: Cross section of the embedded rail superstructure near Best

Figure 9.49: Installing of the rails

Figure 9.50: Positioning of the rails by means of wedges

285

Modern Railway Track

10 THE RAIL

Figure 10.4: Filling process of converter

A water-cooled oxygen lance is lowered into

the furnace and high-purity dry oxygen is
blown onto the metal at very great speed.
The oxygen combines with carbon and
other unwanted elements, thus eliminating
these impurities from the molten charge.
The carbon is blown down to less than
0.1%. During the "blow" lime is added as a
flux to help carry off the oxidized impurities
as a floating layer of slag.
The positioning of the lances, the
determination of the volume of oxygen to
be injected, the additions to be made and
Figure 10.3: Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) (Corus)

309

Modern Railway Track

11 SWITCHES AND CROSSINGS

11 SWITCHES AND CROSSINGS

11.1 The standard turnout
Turnouts are used to divide a track into two, sometimes three tracks. The purpose of crossings
is to allow two tracks to intersect at the same level. If a complete train is to pass from one track
to another while moving and without being subdivided, turnouts are essential in the absence of
turntables or traversers.
It must be possible to run through switches and crossings in both directions. A normal or single
turnout, as shown in Figure 11.1, allows movement of traffic in a straight direction on the
through track or in a divergent direction. A picture of the right-hand turnout is given in Figure
11.2.
Intersection point

Rear of turnout

Clamping (heel)

Through rail

Front of turnout

Wing rail

Stock rail

Crossing

Switch point

Check rail

Switch blade

Closure rail

Half set of switch

L
B

R=... m

1:n
Figure 11.1: Standard right-hand turnout

The turnout consists of three major

parts:

Set of switches (switch blades);

Common crossing;
Closure rail.

These parts will

separately below.

be

Figure 11.2: Picture of right-hand turnout

discussed

370

Modern Railway Track

12 TRACK MAINTENANCE AND RENEWAL

Figure 12.61: Formation rehabilitation machine AHM 800 R

Figure 12.62: Example of tracks after formation rehabilitation with geotextile

422

Modern Railway Track

16 INSPECTION AND DETECTION SYSTEMS

16.10.4 Quasi-static signals

In addition to the dynamic signals, quasi-static signals are produced for cant, curvature, and
gauge. The measuring principles are presented schematically in Figure 16.84. Problems due to
drift and lack of initial conditions mean that the quasi-static cant is not determined by
integration of the rate gyro signal, but by making use of the lateral car body acceleration,
curvature, and recording speed as indicated in Figure 16.84.
CANT

GAUGE

CURVATURE

Y v 2 gB

= B

R L

YS = YL + YR + 1435 mm

= 1 + 2
gB

v 2

YL

YR

All signals low pass filtered with 3rd order Bessel filter
Figure 16.84: Recording principle for BMS-1 quasi-static signals

Two other transducers are, in addition to the two linear displacement transducers between car
body and bogie frame in the measuring bogie, installed in the second bogie to record curvature
according to the principle sketched in Figure 16.84. The quasi-static gauge is directly derived
from the line-scan camera signals.
All three quasi-static signals are low-pass filtered with a 3rd-order Bessel filter. The phase
relationship is linear and causes a distance delay of 27.5 m. As the curvature recorded in fact
corresponds to the car center, the delay of the signal in relation to the measuring bogie
amounts to 35 m or 20 m for forwards and backwards running respectively. With the
introduction of VRA this delay can be corrected.
16.10.5 Signal combination for determining track parameters
The track parameters produced by the former BMS system of NS are derived from a
combination of signals provided by 16 transducers, i.e. 1 rate gyro, 2 accelerometers, 10
LVDTs, 2 line-scan cameras, and 1 tachometer. The location of the various transducers is
indicated in Figure 16.85. The track parameters are derived from the following expressions:
Level:

+
2

(16.6)

582

Modern Railway Track

16 INSPECTION AND DETECTION SYSTEMS

TEC for plain line track;

TEE for switches;
TET for tramway track.

Figure 16.106a: TEC Trolley

Figure 16.106b: TEC Trolley with laser add-on to measure rail profile

Figure 16.106c: TEC control unit

608
Figure 16.107: Example of track geometry measurement results

Modern Railway Track

16 INSPECTION AND DETECTION SYSTEMS

16.18 Weld geometry standards

Force geometry relationship
Dynamic components of the wheel rail contact force have a significant impact on track
deterioration and should therefore be kept as low as possible. Weld geometry plays an
important role as a main contributor to high-frequency loads. At TU Delft this aspect was given
high priority in the early beginning of the 21 century, with a study aiming at developing a
theory, with associating algorithm, to describe dynamic component of the vertical wheel rail
contact force. The algorithm should be such that it could be implemented in a PDA, or handheld computer, fast enough to make real time calculations within seconds.
The existing ways of weld
geometry assessment were
based
on
considering
measured versines which were
then tested against maximum
allowable values. From the
theory developed at TU Delft it
became apparent that the
versine approach was not
correct for representing forces,
but that instead the inclination
of the geometry, in fact the
first
derivative
of
the
measured versines, should be
taken. All the filtering and
analyzes are made in a PDA
and presented to the user in a
normalized way via so-called
Figure 16.131: Best Paper Award, WCRR Montreal 2006
quality indices (QI). The
theory behind this concept was
documented in various publications, amongst others [309, 310]. The paper Force-based
Assessment of Weld Geometry [309] received the Best Paper Award for Infrastructure at the
WCRR in Montreal, Canada, June 2006.
The vertical wheel rail contact force is approximately proportional to the square of the speed. In
this way the standards are speed dependent. Furthermore the contact force is linearly related to
the inclination (first derivative dy/dx of the geometry).

(16.43)

The inclination is determined from the versines measured with the RAILPROF on a base of 1 m,
sampled at an interval of 5 mm. During data processing the samples are averaged (low-pass
623

Modern Railway Track

16 INSPECTION AND DETECTION SYSTEMS

filtered) via a moving

window of 5 samples. This
means that the shortest
wavelength in the resulting
signal is 25 mm. This is
done
to
eliminate
irregularities with a shorter
length-scale.
The corresponding vertical
coordinate of the geometry
is
calculated
as
the
average of the 2 vertical
coordinates
of
the
Figure 16.132: Dynamic contact force versus inclination
measuring positions at
both
sides
of
the
measurement point and that of the measurement point itself (5 coordinates). At the boundaries
of the record 2 measurement points are added; their coordinates are determined by mirroring.
At both edges the first filtered data point then coincides with the boundary of the original
record (Figure 16.133).
After filtering, the first geometrical derivative of the discrete filtered measurement signal
is determined (Figure 16.134), via the formula:

( ) =

( + 1) ()

(16.43)

where:
D(i): first derivative of the measurement;
y(i): level-coordinate of the record (after filtering);
dx:

sample-interval after filtering (25 mm)

The calculated QI values are based on this signal, as depicted at the PDA screen presented in
Figure 16.135.
Added data points

Original data points

Boundary
original signal

Filtered data points

spaced 25 mm

Figure 16.133: Filtering and applied method at the record boundaries

y(i +1)

y(i)

dx = 25 mm
Figure 16.134: Calculation of the 1st derivative of the filtered signal

624

Modern Railway Track

16 INSPECTION AND DETECTION SYSTEMS

RAILPROF PDA screen.

On the RAILPROF screen (Figure 16.135) the blue line represents the vertical geometry, the
orange line the QI. The person doing the finish grinding can immediately see where the QI is
exceeding the norm (by definition QI = 1) - in this case 6 % - and which spots should be
ground. In the figure it is clearly seen that the slope right of the middle is too large and so the
center part should be ground to decrease the inclination and thus the maximum QI.
Figure 16.136 shows maximum dynamic contact forces calculated with the program DARTS NL
as a function of versine (geometry) and inclination (first derivative dy/dx of the vertical rail
geometry). From the left-hand graph it is obvious that the contact force does not correlate (9
%) with the versine (geometry), whereas the inclination (QI) in the right-hand graph very well
correlates (91 %) with the force. This means, amongst others, that a steel straightedge, as still
in use on a wide scale, is absolutely inadequate.

QI =

Inclinationmax
1
Inclinationnorm

OK

Figure 16.135: Quality Index (QI) definition

Figure 16.136: Quality Index (QI) definition

625

Modern Railway Track

16 INSPECTION AND DETECTION SYSTEMS

Rail geometry standards applied at ProRail in the Netherlands

Standards vertical rail geometry

Standards lateral rail geometry

Speed [km/h]

Inclination [mrad]

Speed [km/h]

Versine p [mm]

250 < V 300

1.0

80 < V 300

-0.5 p 0.5

200 < V 250

1.1

40 < V 80

-0.7 p 0.7

180 < V 200

1.3

V 40

-1.0 p 1.0

160 < V 180

1.4

140 < V 160

1.6

120 < V 140

1.8

100 < V 120

2.0

90 < V 100

2.2

80 < V 90

2.3

70 < V 80

2.4

60 < V 70

2.6

50 < V 60

2.8

40 < V 50

3.0

V 40

3.2

Table 16.10: Weld geometry standards applied by

ProRail, The Netherlands

The admissible QI in relation to the line speed is presented in Table 16.10, which values are
presently the official standards used by ProRail in The Netherlands and these standard have
also been adopted by the tram and metro companies in Holland. These are all based on the TU
Delft studies referred to previously.
From a practical point of view the new standards have a number of advantages, amongst
others:

Negative welds are allowed;

Maximum versine at 140 km/h is 2 times larger than in the olds approach;
The standards are now speed dependent.

Cost savings
With the introduction of the new approach on force-based assessment of weld geometry and
the adoption of new QI-based standards, various estimates were made about the reduction in
maintenance cost which could be achieved if complying with the new standards. These
estimates are presented in Figure 16.137, which shows that 10 20 % reduction of the annual
maintenance budget could be achieved. According to ProRail figures, collected around 2010, the
claimed track maintenance cost reductions were too conservative and would be more in the
order of 20 - 40 % according to more recent maintenance experiences!
626

Modern Railway Track

17 HIGH-SPEED TRACKS

The TGV
After intensive tests with the
gas-turbine "TGV 001" and the
electric "Zbulon", in 1977, the
SNCF placed an order for 87
TGV Sud-Est train sets. They
used the "TGV 001" concept,
with a permanently coupled set
of eight cars, sharing "Jakobs
bogies", and hauled by two
electric power-cars, one at each
end.

Figure 17.3 TGV_POS_Nuremberg_Ingolstadt.

In 1981, the first section of the

new Paris-Lyon High-Speed line was inaugurated, with a maximum speed of 260/270 km/h.
With this much higher speed, this dedicated high-speed line, offered the ability to join
connected cities in a much shorter time. After the introduction of the TGV on some routes, air
traffic on these routes decreased, or even disappeared. At the same time, the TGV made history
with its multiple, highly publicized speed records: in 1981 with a record at 380 km/h, in 1990 at
515 km/h, and then in 2007 at 574 km/h.

Figure 17.4 European high-speed network as per ultimo 2013.

631

Modern Railway Track

17 HIGH-SPEED TRACKS

The Chinese CRH3

Figure 17.7 Chinese CRH380B-6410L

State planning for China's high-speed railway began in the early 1990s, and the country started
construction of its first high-speed rail line, the QinhuangdaoShenyang Passenger Railway, in
1999, which subsequently opened in 2003 with a design speed of 200 km/h.
The original goal of the Chinese Ministry of Railways (MOR) was to research and develop
domestic technology to reach a world standard. The new high-speed rail line was used to test
several Chinese developed prototypes. Although they were successful at creating a train set
that operated at 300 km/h, the trains performed poorly in regular service. Realizing that
domestic high-speed technology was not sufficiently developed, the MOR purchased high-speed
trains from French, German, and Japanese manufacturers with technology transfer contracts to
improve its ability to build high-speed trains. In 2007 the first high-speed service using foreign
high-speed trains, called China Railways High-Speed (CRH) was introduced.

Figure 17.8 Taiwan (THRR) high-speed train

634

Modern Railway Track

17 HIGH-SPEED TRACKS

Dp
Calculated
Measured

3.5
Pressure [kPa]

Dp1

Dp2

3
t0 = 0
t1 = 27.24 s
t2 = 56.00 s

2.5
2
1.5
1

Dp3
to

t1

0.5
0
0

t2

Figure 17.22: Characteristic pressure course in a leak test

10

20

30

40

50 Time [s]

Figure 17.23: Static leak test: comparison of measuring/calculation

After this C1 and C2 can be computed. With C1 and C2 and the function of pe(t) provided for
instance by the program THERMATUN/5, pi(t) can be calculated.
2500

50%

30%

10%
Japan 1996

Pressure variation [kPa]

2000
Japan 1993

2,5%

1500

Germany 1996
C

1000
Germany 1989
B
500
A
Proposal
0
0

10
12
Time period [s]

14

16

18

20

Figure 17.24: Proposed Dutch criterion for p in train by solo trains in tunnels

The time for reducing of the inside air-pressure from 3.0 kPa to 0.1 kPa is 51 s. The factor k is
estimated 0.07 based on a French TGV-R. With these values the constant factors C1 and C2 are
then 0.03408 and 0.02661 respectively. (Figure 17.16)
654

Modern Railway Track

CV Coenraad Esveld

Plasser & Theurer, Austria: Various consulting works on track maintenance applications;

SPOORNET, South Africa: Network inspection and advise on improving track

components and maintenance strategy;

Metro Amsterdam: studies on wheel rail interface optimization and track maintenance
strategies; advices on design problems with new lines;

State Rail Authority of New South Wales, Australia: Studies carried out on track quality
assessment and track recording;

Europoint, The Netherlands: Organizing various conferences and seminars, such as RailTech Europe;

UIC/ORE/ERRI: Project management of various research projects, such as D202 on

Track Stability and longitudinal forces;

Great Belt Bridge: Advisor to ARCADIS for the dynamic analysis of the bridge transitions;

MAIN ACTIVITIES OF ECS

Training and seminars

High Speed Operation

Heavy Haul and Heavy Axle Loads

Vehicle - Track Interaction

Track Dynamics

Track Maintenance Operations

Decision Support Systems

Life Cycle Costs

Development and Testing of Track Structures

Measuring and Recording Systems for Track Applications

Optimization techniques and applications

PUBLICATIONS
http://www.esveld.com/Download/TUD
http://www.esveld.com/RP_PDA.htm
ftp://213.127.130.218/ Lectures, presentations, railway videos.
723