Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
s
i
t
ur
as the disease develops (1). This loss has a devastating effect on both patients and their caregivers, who witness
how a persons self slowly disappears.
However, this deterioration does not follow a linear
process. Autobiographic memory presents a dissociation which affects performance, due to the relation between its episodic and semantic components (2). It is a
form of episodic memory and, as such, is affected by the
deterioration of episodic memory. AD patients remember
remote events from their youth better than the more
recent ones of adulthood (3) and have more difficulty than
elderly persons without dementia in acquiring new autobiographic information and remembering these facts (1).
Researchers have attempted to clarify some of these
mechanisms which underlie recovery processes of autobiographic memory in AD. The aim is to develop a rehabilitation model to stimulate and favor the recovery of
autobiographic information in patients with AD, in order
to maintain and stimulate their best preserved capabilities,
in an attempt to achieve the best possible functional situation and quality of life. In this vein, reminiscence or then
life review technique (4) is an effort to maintain remote
and autobiographic memory even in people in states of
dementia. Reminiscence activates personal memory by focusing recall on the personal aspects of events, stimulating identity and the emotional aspects of memory. Although the reminiscence technique has had positive effects
on quality of life, handling of depression, and satisfaction
and well-being of patients with AD (4, 5), little evidence
has been found that it improves cognitive processes in
general or autobiographic memory in particular. Other
K
e
c
i
r
LY
t
N
i
O
d
E
E
S
U
,
L
2
A
1
N
O
S
20
PER
2012,
R
O
F
Editrice Kurtis
INTRODUCTION
Alzheimers disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with clearly defined clinical characteristics. Cognitive deterioration in AD includes practically
all cognitive abilities, but the most evidently affected one,
from onset, is memory. Memory loss is progressive,
starting with some mild word loss which gradually becomes more severe, until patients cannot even remember
their own personal history. This same process takes
place in autobiographic memory. At the onset of the
disease it is relatively preserved, but gradually deteriorates
condition this time elapsed while the questions were being prepared. After auditory stimulation, participants
were given the autobiographical questionnaire in order to
evaluate differing areas of memory: remote (Rem: 12
points), mid-remote (MRem: 8 points) and recent (Rec: 10
points). Questions were asked orally and repeated up
to three times if needed. Responses were given in writing.
To avoid the confabulation effect, participants were given precise instructions with regard to their inability to answer the questions. If they did not remember, they were
asked to say only I dont remember, to which the experimenter would respond, Dont worry if you cant
answer all the questions at the present time. At the
end of the session, participants were thanked for participating. The dependent variable was participants performance on the autobiographic memory questionnaire.
In order to avoid noise due to the differences among the
scales of the various time periods, points were changed to
percentages for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Participants mean recall was 19.85 points (SD=6.80).
To analyze their performance outcomes, we ran a multivariate 5x3 ANOVA taking as factors the auditory condition (HM, SM, NM, CS, NS) and the time range of autobiographic memory (remote, mid-remote and recent periods). The dependent variable was performance on the
sub-scales of the autobiographic memory questionnaire.
Scores were converted to percentage for greater comparability. Orthogonal planned comparisons were subsequently carried out among them (see performance data in Table 1).
No significant effect of interaction was found between
the variables of music type and time range (F8,192=0.721).
The auditory factor showed a significant effect
(F4,96=5.851, p<0.001) of differences among the five auditory conditions. Orthogonal planned contrasts revealed
that significant differences were found between quiet
(NS) and Sounds (SM+HM+NM+CS; F 1,24=6.659,
p=0.016); recall was significantly better in Sounds
(mean=0.67) than in Quiet (mean=0.63). Recall was
significantly better (F1,24=9.916, p=0.004) in the two
types of emotional music (HM+SM; mean=0.69) than in
Music Type
Happy Music
Sad Music
New Music
Coffee Shop Sound
No Sound
Mean
SD
Remote
Mean (SD)
Mid-Remote
Mean (SD)
Recent
Mean (SD)
19.98
21.08
19.90
19.30
18.98
6.47
5.95
6.30
7.45
7.59
9.64 (2.76)
10.20 (2.84)
9.28 (2.73)
9.32 (3.27)
9.42 (3.23)
6.16 (2.07)
6.44 (1.42)
6.22 (1.74)
5.80 (2.29)
5.62 (2.46)
4.20 (2.54)
4.56 (3.06)
4.40 (2.79)
4.14 (2.80)
3.86 (3.11)
Valentine (16), the ability to remember autobiographic information better after a musical stimulus is the result of an
increase in attention levels (arousal) or in attention absorption (37). We can add that this facilitating effect takes
place not only for attentional reasons but also as a result of
the importance of the emotional aspect. Emotion-inducing
music (happy and sad) evokes autobiographic memories in
AD patients better than non-musical sounds. It is the
emotional involvement rather than the music itself which
enhances autobiographical information. The induction of
an emotional component accompanies and favors the
retrieval of memories. The importance of the emotional
context in the consolidation of memories or long-term potentiation (LTP) in memory is well known. LTP undergoes
gradual deterioration in the aging process and is especially
virulent in cortical-type dementias, owing to neurological
damage in the amygdala and hippocampal regions (38).
Patients with AD show deficits in the recall of emotional
events, due to deterioration in these structures.
Also thought-provoking is the comment by Foster
and Valentine (16), regarding the areas of memory which
are more sensitive to musical stimuli. The area defined as
remote is more affected when participants listen to the
music, but this is not the case with mid-remote and recent
memories. Thus it seems to be confirmed once again the
fact that these types of autobiographic memory work
differently. In our study, the superiority of the music effect
was evident in the recall of remote but not mid-remote and
recent memories. As mentioned in the Introduction (2), remote memory seems to behave like semantic memory, affected by emotional recall cues, whereas recent memory
is episodic. The cause of this may be that autobiographic memory also depends on the hippocampal complex
and the medial temporal lobes dealing with episodic
memory. These are the areas in which brain lesions begin
in most AD patients. However, time is also a variable in
autobiographic information. The most recent memories
are essentially episodic, whereas more distant and remote
memories which have been repeatedly evoked lose their
temporal and contextual specificity and take on characteristics of personal semantic knowledge. Thus, Kazui et
al. (39) showed that personal semantic memory has features of both episodic and semantic memory, that semantic memory is transformed from episodic memory,
and that defective personal semantic memory is related to
both semantic and episodic memory dysfunction in persons in advanced stages of AD. The memory of past incidents or events, famous events which took place in
the past, celebrities, places in their life history or historical events which took place in their lifetime (without being directly autobiographic) are affected during the course
of the disease. In both cases, episodic or semantic, this
seems to be the result of problems in the strategic process
of evocation (1).
In addition, as expected we found differences between
REFERENCES
1. Greene JDW, Baddeley AD, Hodges JR. Analysis of episodic
memory deficit in early Alzheimer's disease: evidence from the
Doors and People Test. Neuropsychologia 1996; 34: 537-51.
24. Schulkind MD, Hennis LK, Rubin DC. Music, emotion, and autobiographical memory: theyre playing your song. Mem Cogn
1999; 27: 948-55.
25. Gagnon L, Peretz I, Flp T. Musical structural determinants of
emotional judgments in dementia of the Alzheimer type.
Neuropsychology 2009; 23: 90-7.
26. Barnes-Holmes Y, Barnes-Holmes D, Smeets PM, Luciano C. A
derived transfer of mood functions through equivalence relations. Psychol Rec 2004; 54: 95-113.
27. Dreisbach G, Goschke T. How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased
distractibility. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2004, 30:
343-53.
28. Isen AM. Some perspectives on positive feelings and emotions:
Positive affect facilitates thinking and problem solving. In Manstead
ASR, Frijda N, Fischer A (eds) Feelings and Emotions: The
Amsterdam Symposium. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University
Press, 2004: 263-81.
29. Bower GH. Commentary on mood and memory. Behav Res Ther
1987; 25: 443-55.
30. Matsumoto J. Why people listen to sad music. Effects of music on
sad moods. Jpn J Educ Psychol 2002; 50: 23-32.
31. Abercrombie HC, Speck NS, Monticelli RM. Endogenous cortisol elevations are related to memory facilitation only in individuals who are emotionally aroused. Psychoneuroendocrinology
2006; 31: 187-96.
32. Meiln JJG, Carro J, Guerrero C, Carpi A, Gmez C, Palmero
F. The effect of memory congruence with the affective state: differential recognition of sadness and happiness words. An Psicol
2011; 28: 266-73.
33. Gordillo F, Arana JM, Mestas et al. Emotion and recognition
memory: the discrimination of negative information as an adaptive process. Psicothema 2010; 22: 765-71.
34. Reisberg B, Ferris SH, De Leon MJ, Crook T. The global deterioration scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia.
Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139: 1136-9.
35. Watson D, Wiese D, Vaidya J, Tellegen A. The two general activation systems of affect: structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol
1999; 76: 820-38.
36. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Minimental-State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-98.
37. Salame P, Baddeley A. Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory. Q J Exp Psychol 1989; 41A: 10722.
38. Gordillo F, Mestas L, Arana JM, Meiln JJG. The influence of
emotion on memory as marks for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer
disease. Alzheimer Realidades e Investigacin en Demencias
2011; 47: 5-11.
39. Kazui H, Hashimoto M, Hirono N, Mori E. Nature of personal semantic memory: evidence from Alzheimer's disease.
Neuropsychologia 2003; 41: 981-8.
40. Allen R, Brosgole L. Facial and auditory affect recognition in senile geriatrics, the normal elderly and young adults. Int J Neurosci
1993; 68: 33-42.
41. Drapeau J, Gosselin N, Gagnon L, Peretz I, Lorrain D. Emotional
recognition from face, voice, and music in dementia of Alzheimer
type. The Neurosciences and Music III - Disorders and Plasticity.
Ann NY Acad Sci 2009; 1169: 342-5.