Fulton & Conestoga Title Abstract Arguement Prepared by Stan J. Caterbone For Steve Caterbone in Tom Caterbone Estate Matters in 1998

Legal Argument for the Estate of Thomas P.
Caterbone Re: Fulton Bank and Conestoga Title, Prepared by Stan J. Caterbone
Argument: (Diversion of Funds = Fulton Bank)

1. Plaintiff, (Conestoga Title), is using a technical deficiency found in the defendants,
(Country Funding), mortgage to support its claim that National Citys (Insured)
mortgage is a superior mortgage with first lien position.
2. At settlement on May 16, 1995 United Financial/Abstract United diverted funds from
Country Funding that were intended to satisfy the mortgage of Country Funding, thus
prompting Country Funding to challenge National Citys 1st lien position.
3. Conestoga Title and United Financial/Abstract United also had an agency relationship
during the transaction and settlement of May 16, 1995.
4. United Financial/Abstract United principals have since been charged and have
admitted guilt to the Lancaster County District Attorney to such a crime on May 16,
1995, the day of the settlement, which enacting the diversion of funds, which were
intended to satisfy Country Fundings mortgage.
5. Country Funding hereby claims that the criminal act of the diversion of funds by
United Financial/Abstract United, is the only reason that enables Conestoga Title to
make the claim of a technical deficiency in its efforts to provide National City
with a 1st lien position, resulting in Conestoga Title eluding any financial obligations
to Country Funding or National City.
6. Country Funding claims that Conestoga Title had a fiduciary relationship with United
Financial/Abstract United, acting as its agent at the time of settlement, and thus
should not be allowed to benefit from the criminal act , (the diversion of funds) by
claiming the technical deficiency of the Country Funding mortgage, to defend 1st lein
position of National City. The technical deficiency is only material to this dispute
because it is the direct result of a crime.
7. Conestoga Titles agency relationship with United Financial/Abstract United could be
construed as collusion if it were permitted to use the crime as a means of avoiding its
responsibility of providing National City with a 1st lien position by satisfying the
Country Funding mortgage with a $70,285.00 pay off. It would have financially
benefited by the criminal act of its own agent, United Financial/Abstract United
8. Country Funding was the victim of one crime when the funds were diverted at
settlement. Allowing Conestoga Title to avoid its financial responsibility and use
the crime to ultimately lead to its claim of the technical deficiency, would shift
the financial burden from Conestoga Title to Country Funding, the victim. Allowing
Conestoga Title to use the direct results of a crime to absolve its financial interest,
would then make Country Funding the victim of two crimes.
STAN
CATERBONE
Advanced
Media Group v. Fulton Bank Wrongful Death Page
Page11of
of 158
1
Monday, January
11,in2016
Authored
1998
126 East King Street

Lancaster, PA 17602-2893
Te1717.299.5201 Fax 717.291.4660
Stephanie Carfley, Esquire

Direct Dial Number: 717.399.1536
E-mail: scarfley@barley.com
December 28,2007
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Re:
Letter to Board of Directors and Ethics Point Report
Dear Mr. Caterbone:

As you know, our firm represents Fulton Financial Corporation ("Fulton") in connection
with the allegations lodged against Fulton by you.
Fulton is in receipt of your December 13,2007 letter requesting the resignation of R.
Scott Smith, Jr. as Chairman and CEO, and it has been shared with the Board of Directors. In
that letter, you indicate that you are a shareholder of Fulton. At your earliest convenience, would
you kindly verify that you are, in fact, a shareholder and provide me with evidence of your status
as a current shareholder of Fulton. Additionally, I would like to request that you please provide
the "evidence of negligence, incompetence, and possible criminal conduct within the Fulton
Financial Corporation" you mention in your letter, or a summary of the evidence supporting your
claims, so Fulton can fully evaluate your claims.
Fulton is also in receipt of your December 21,2007 Ethics Point Report in which you
allege that Fulton has engaged in "misconduct or inappropriate behavior." Fulton intends to
investigate and address your report in accordance with its existing procedures for Ethics Point
~ e ~ o r t However,
s.
in order to assess the merit and substance of your report in accordance with
these ~rocedures.Fulton will reauire the "written details" to which you allude in that report.
Please note that specific details, not simply reference to your company's website, are required to
make this assessment. If the evidence in support of your report is the same as that to which you
refer in your December 13th letter, kindly provide a statement verifying that fact.
We ask that you provide the requested information within the next two weeks. The
information should be forwarded to this office and we will ensure that it is shared with Fulton.
Alternatively, you may enter the details of your Ethics Point Report and upload documents and
information related to the report directly on the Ethics Point site. We ask that you upload only
STAN CATERBONE v. Fulton Bank Wrongful Death Page 2 of 158
Monday, January 11, 2016
August 9, 1990
David C. Hostetter
Executive Vice President
Fulton Bank
One Penn Square
Lancaster, PA 17602
Dear Mr. Hostetter:
I have become very disappointed in your ability to correct a
problem that your bank has made regarding my personal
banking account #0118-74848. In fact, your actions have not
only caused me great concern for my investments that I have
entrusted in your institution, but I am now being humiliated and
intimidated by your lack of concern. This incident has now
caused me to question whether you have simply stolen my
assets. The amount of money in question is some $5,000. I,m
sure not one of your larger accounts, however I'll fight like hell
for $5,000.
You must be aware of the implications of this incident with
regards to the past performance of both commercial and, savings
and loan institutions. The public has already grown insecure and
has lost a great deal of confidence in the banking community at
large. And maybe this is an example of how mismanagement
and abuse can cause some of the same public insecurities as the
actual failures themselves.
The following will depict a chronological accounting of the above
mentioned incident:
On July 31, 1990 at 2:18pm (see MAC receipt) I was denied
withdraw privileges from my checking and Fulton Fund accounts
at the Greenfield center. After another unsuccessful attempt, I
decided to inquire inside to a teller. I could not understand the
problem, knowing that I should have at least $5,000 in the
accounts.
The teller began an inquire on my accounts in the computer
system. After 15 minuets, she informed me that my checking
account had a 0 balance. I informed her that I also had a Fulton
Fund account with sweep, and maybe there was a problem with
that fund. Again after 15 minuets she came back with the same
answer. The manager began to become annoyed with my
problem and my concern over the situation. I asked to see some
accounting, and she said she could provide an account activity
report.
As she began scrolling transactions over the screen, I began
peering over the counter trying to review the account. I had
noticed a check for $6,250.00. I asked her if that was in fact a
check for that amount. She said "yes, number 470, made out in
June". I quite excitedly stated that I had never made out a
check for six thousand dollars in June. SHE LOOKED AT ME,

QUITE IRRITATED, AND SAID, "WE'LL SIR, YOU MOST
CERTAINLY DID".
August 9, 1990, David C. Hostetter
Now, I was emotionally shook, I had just lost $5,000 or
$6,0000, and I had no idea how. I would certainly remember
any check written for $6,000. The manager had no right to even
question my ability to recollect such an incident. Instead of
receiving support, and help in dealing with my problem, I
received harassment.
Does the word CUSTOMER SUPPORT
mean anything to your organization?.
The only advice that was given by your staff was "to go home
and check your statement". Now I must question whether you
provide any training or education to your employees.
Well, I proceeded back to my business meeting. I was quite
upset and disturbed the rest of the day, trying to determine how
someone could have stolen one of my checks without my
knowledge. This was my only logical explanation, of which the
manager suggested that the only way to recover the funds was
to prosecute. That was even more encouraging.
That evening I rushed home and proceeded to review my
statements for check #470. The statement showed a debit for
$6,250. Corresponding to the computer inquiry of that day.
However, the canceled check #470 was for "TWELVE HUNDRED
AND FIFTY DOLLARS". I will admit that the $1,250.00 could look
like a six (SEE COPY). But isn't that why we write the amount
out in longhand?? At this point I was just elated to have
recovered my lost $5,000, (for approximately 37 days).
The next day I had made copies of the check at my office, and
proceeded to the Greenfield branch at noon, on August 1st. I
took the original check and copies of my statement. Before I
reached the counter, the teller asked "if I had found my
problem?" I said "no, I found your problem". I went on to
display the check, and also give my dissatisfaction with the
attitude by the Manager that I had forgotten about a $6,000
check, and that the customer service was really customer
intimidation. Never once did anyone mention or suggest that
there could be an error in the accounts, and that maybe because
I had never remembered writing a check out for $6,000, that
maybe I never did.
The teller was polite and understanding, she proceeded with my
check to the Manager's office, and returned notifying me that she
would need to take possession of the actual check for
verification.
August 9, 1990,
David C. Hostetter
She informed me that the account would be brought current that

day, August 1, 1990. I asked her how I could withdraw cash,
being I still had no means of getting cash. She asked me to
write a check out made payable for cash (see check #486). She
handed me $50.00 in cash.
Excluding the lost interest and any cancelled check fees, - I
thought I was made almost whole.
TODAY IS AUGUST 9,1990
I HAVE A CURRENT BALANCE OF $ 129.61I STILL RECEIVE CANCELLED CHECK NOTICES
I CONTINUE TO HAVE CREDITORS NOT BEING PAID
I CONTINUE TO HAVE MY CREDIT ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY
YOUR ACTIONS AND NEGLECT
YOUR INSTITUTION REFUSES TO RETURN MY ASSETS
I CONTINUE TO EXPERIENCE STRESS AND INTIMIDATION FROM
YOUR LACK OF CONCERN FOR ME - YOUR CUSTOMER
NOW, YOU HAVE A PROBLEM.
Regards,
Stan J. Caterbone
"Just" a Customer
ENCLOSURES
cc:
CORPORATION
PO. BOX 4887
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA 17604
March 25, 2005
Mr. Stan J. Caterbone

220 Stone Hill Road
Corestoga, PA !?5 16.
Dear Mr. Caterbone:
I am Deputy General Counsel for Fulton Financial Corporation ("FFC"), and I am writing
to you at the request of Fulton Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FFC. Mr. E. Philip Wenger,
President and Chief Operating Officer of Fulton Bank referred your letter dated February 21,
2005 to me for review and rcsponsc.
As I understand your inquiry, it concerns a check which your deceased brother, Thomas
P. Caterbone, attempted to deposit to an account he maintained at Fulton Bank. Subsequent to
your original letter, you provided a copy of the front side of the check in question. The check
was drawn on Fulton Bank by Abstract United, Inc., and was payable to Country Funding. The
check was dated May 16,2005 and was payable in the amount of $70,285.00. The face of the
check has been conspicuously stamped "Account Frozen." I understand that Country Funding
was a trade name under which your deceased brother operated as a sole proprietor. You have
indicated that Fulton Bank declined to accept the check for deposit on multiple occasions.
Fulton Bank has conducted research concerning the check, to determine whether any
information exists concerning its original processing. Unfortunately, because of the passage of
nearly ten yexs since this check was issued, Fu!tan Bank no longer maintains aiiy transaction
records for the account on which the check was drawn. Fulton Bank's general account records
do, however, indicate that the account on which the check was drawn was closed on June 2,
1995.
Since there are no transaction records concerning the actual processing of the check, I
will confine my response to general provisions applicable to items presented for deposit to a
Fulton Bank deposit account. Fulton Bank's deposit accounts are subject to Fulton Bank's Rules
and Regulations for Deposit Accounts. I have enclosed with this letter a copy of the Rules,
which would have been in effect during 1995. The last sentence of the first paragraph of Section
1 (Deposit Accounts) provides that Fulton Bank "may at any time refuse any deposit, limit the
amount which may be deposited, return all or any part of any deposit, or may close your account,
with interest, if any, to the date of closing of such account." Again, Fulton Bank has no means to
STAN
CATERBONE
Advanced
Page71of
of 158
3
Monday, January
11,
March
25,2016
2005
STAN
CATERBONE
Advanced
Page82of
of 158
3
Monday, January
11,
March
25,2016
2005
STAN
CATERBONE
Advanced
Page93of
of 158
3
Monday, January
11,
March
25,2016
2005
amgroup01@msn.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
Blog: http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/
Research Blog: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com
Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
January 25, 2008

Ms. Dianne M. Nast, Esq.
RodaNast, PC
801 Estelle Drive
Lancaster, PA 17601
Re: Fulton Bank Class Action & Shareholder Complaints
Dear Dianne:
I hope this letter finds you well; it has been awhile since we have communicated to one another.
I am a shareholder of record of Fulton Financial Corporation (Fulton) since July of 2005. Fulton is
listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange. Since the subprime fiasco and the credit crises I have been
watching attentively at the fallout of Fultons problem with an acquisition a few years ago of Resource
Bank, and what I consider a negligent Board of Directors. Resource bank has been the source of
approximately $24,000,000 of losses to Fulton shareholders. More losses may be ensuing. In December
of 2007, Fulton had expensed $900,000 to review the Resource problems and the write-downs of the $24
million dollars.
On July 11, 2007 I had posted a message on the Yahoo Finance Message Board for Fulton stock
investors and traders that suggested that any dissatisfied shareholders should collaborate if they feel so
compelled to pursue litigation or a class action lawsuit. There were many investors posting their
dissatisfaction with Fulton senior management on the Resource Bank issue and the last few years of
declining stock value. One poster responded with an affirmative message the she was willing to
contribute several thousand dollars toward a class action lawsuit, and acknowledged that she know of
other other large shareholders that are willing to contribute. That message is attached.
On December 13th, 2007 I personally had delivered a letter to the Fulton Board of Directors and
requested the resignation of R. Scott Smith, Jr., for negligence and misconduct. The Board of Directors
responded in a letter dated December 28, 2007, which is attached. They have been requesting that I put
my allegations with any supporting evidence in writing.
In the letter of December 28th, 2007 they stated: Additionally, I would like to request that you
please provide the "evidence of negligence, incompetence, and possible criminal conduct within the Fulton
Financial Corporation" you mention in your letter, or a summary of the evidence supporting your claims,
so Fulton can fully evaluate your claims.
I have responded in a letter, which is attached, and in essence told Fulton that I would not be able
to meet the deadline of a few weeks. Fulton responded and requested the information by January 30,
2008. I have since provided Fulton with a CD-ROM of my correspondence, research, and other related
STAN
CATERBONE
of14
158
Advanced
Page10
1 of
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
files on the subject matter. I did not provide any detailed summary of the requested allegations, but
merely sent them raw data in case I was unable to deliver a summary and detail of my allegations.
Before I submit my allegations in writing, as requested, I would like an opinion from a qualified
class action attorney that may be interested in these matters. Of course, with your spectacular record as
a class action litigant, I would like to meet with you to discuss my options. Also attached is a letter from
Ms. Stephanie Carfley, of Barley Snyder, LLC, the Fulton attorney involved in these matters, stating and
answering my question of conflict regarding her past employment with your firm, RodaNast, P.C. and Joe.
Would you please contact me at your earliest convenience regarding these matters? I apologize
for the lateness in contacting you, however my own litigation schedule has been quite extensive.
With Kindest Regards,
Stan J. Caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Enclosures
Cc: Stephanie Carfley, Barely Snyder, LLC.
STAN
CATERBONE
of14
158
Advanced
Page11
2 of
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
STAN
CATERBONE
of14
158
Advanced
Page12
3 of
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
Barley Snyder LLC

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Tel 717.299.5201 Fax 717.291.4660
www.barley.com

January 8, 2008
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Re:
Dear Mr. Caterbone:

I am in receipt of your letter of January 1, 2008 regarding the above referenced matters.
You raise a number of issues in your letter, to which we would like to respond.
Initially, in response to your request for verification that Barley Snyder is authorized to
act on behalf of Fulton with regard to these matters, I direct you to the November 14> 2007 letter
from R. Scott Smith, Jr. to you, in which he states: "If you have any matters that you wish to
communicate, please direct them to our counsel: Stephanie Carfley, Barley Snyder, LLC ...."
The role of Barley Snyder in the context of the claims made by you in the December 13, 2007
letter and the December 21, 2007 Ethics Point Report is to advise Fulton and serve as a conduit
for communications between yourself and Fulton. Please be assured though that the actual
investigation of the claims will be conducted by Fulton itself. In light of the above, we again
request that you forward the information and documents supporting your claims to this office and
we will ensure that it is shared with Fulton. If you still have concerns about providing the
requested evidence to Barley Snyder, you may, as previously mentioned, enter the details of your
Ethics Point Report and upload documents and information related to your report directly on the
Ethics Point website. Again though, we ask that you upload only those documents that directly
relate to the claims made in your Ethics Point Report and/or the December 13th letter.
In your letter, you also reference your extensive litigation schedule and the need for
additional time to provide the documentation referenced in your December 13th letter and your
Ethics Point Report. While the allegations made by you in those communications are of a very
serious nature and Fulton would like to investigate these claims as soon as possible, Fulton is
willing to extend the time period for you to produce evidence supporting your allegations until
January 31, 2008. That said, however, in the event that evidence in support of your claims is not
received by January 31 st, Fulton will deem your allegations to be unsubstantiated and the matters
will be closed. This would not preclude you from renewing the allegations in the future if and
when you provide evidence that directly supports the claims.
Lancaster York Harrisburg Reading Berwyn Hanover

STAN
CATERBONE
of14
158
Advanced
Page13
4 of
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
January 8, 2008
Page 2
Finally, you indicate in your letter that you will provide the documentation addressed in
the Ethics Point Report, and in the letters to Fulton. In order to most efficiently and effectively
investigate your allegations, at your earliest convenience, kindly advise as to whether or not the
"evidence of negligence, incompetence, and possible criminal conduct" you mention in your
letter is the same evidence supporting the claims of "misconduct or inappropriate behavior"
made in your Ethics Point Report.
Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation with regard to the above. Should
you have any questions, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
Stephanie Garftey
SC/SC:2145342.1
cc: George R. Barr, Jr.

Paul G. Mattaini
STAN
CATERBONE
of14
158
Advanced
Page14
5 of
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
amgroup01@msn.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
January 1, 2008
Ms. Stephanie Carfley
Barley Snyder LLC
Lancaster, PA 17602
Re:
Letter of December 28, 2007 re: Letter to Board of Directors and Ethics Point Report
Dear Ms. Carfley:

I am in receipt of your letter of December 28, 2007. As you have confirmed, on Monday December 31,
2007 I sent via email my proof of ownership of Fulton Financial Corporation stock.
I will address your letter and your demands. First, I would definitely need some verification from Fulton
Financial Corporation that authorized you to author that letter. I have had recent direct communications
from Mr. R. Scott Smith, Jr.,.
Secondly, I would require that I deal with these issues with other counsel outside of Barley Snyder, LLC,
or a member of the Board of Directors. I will not communicate these issues with any member of Barley
Snyder, LLC due to the past problems and bad faith efforts to litigate on behalf of Fulton Bank. The no
trespass notice that was initiated by both Mr. Shawn Long and Mr. Ronald H. Pollack were totally
unjustified and issued for the sole reason to intimidate and discredit my litigation. I do not believe that
Barley Snyder, LLC has litigated in good faith.
You must remember that I have been wronged by Fulton Bank, as far back as 1987 to the present, and
Fulton Bank has been unjustly enriched. I would love nothing more than to litigate these matters in a civil
manner, however, it is apparent that I am the only litigant that has demonstrated that objective.
Thirdly, I have had persistent problems litigating my court schedule due to the persistent barrage of
computer hacking, computer sabotage, and thefts of my personal property. I realize that these are not
your responsibilities, however as pro se, I am not able to provide the expediency in delivering documents
and evidence that other counsel enjoys. As you are aware, my litigation schedule is extensive at the
present time. I am in the midst of the appeal process of MD 879-2007, a private criminal complaint that
at the moment indirectly involves your client, Fulton Bank. Unfortunately, I must deal with the Lancaster
County District Attorneys Office and their continued disdain for misstatements and false statements
regarding the record.
I am currently in talks with the County of Lancaster to consider a mediation process to work through some
of these extraneous problems that involve thefts of my property and evidence, harassment, and the lack
of protection from law enforcement.
Of Course, at the present, Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et.al., (05-2288); which Fulton Bank is a
defendant, is in the Third Circuit, and requires my attention.
STAN
CATERBONE
of14
158
Advanced
Page15
6 of
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
I will provide the documentation that I addressed in the Ethics Point Report, and in the letters to Fulton
Financial Corporation. It just will not be within the next 2 weeks.
I would like Fulton Corporation to provide a letter authorizing Barley Snyder, LLC to negotiate the terms
and conditions of addressing your demands in the letter of December 28, 2007, and with whom they
would like to represent them, outside of Barley Snyder, LLC.
Respectfully,
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se

cc: file
STAN
CATERBONE
of14
158
Advanced
Page16
7 of
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008

Te1717.299.5201 Fax 717.291.4660

December 28,2007
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Re:
Dear Mr. Caterbone:

As you know, our firm represents Fulton Financial Corporation ("Fulton") in connection
with the allegations lodged against Fulton by you.
Fulton is in receipt of your December 13,2007 letter requesting the resignation of R.
Scott Smith, Jr. as Chairman and CEO, and it has been shared with the Board of Directors. In
that letter, you indicate that you are a shareholder of Fulton. At your earliest convenience, would
you kindly verify that you are, in fact, a shareholder and provide me with evidence of your status
as a current shareholder of Fulton. Additionally, I would like to request that you please provide
the "evidence of negligence, incompetence, and possible criminal conduct within the Fulton
Financial Corporation" you mention in your letter, or a summary of the evidence supporting your
claims, so Fulton can fully evaluate your claims.
Fulton is also in receipt of your December 21,2007 Ethics Point Report in which you
allege that Fulton has engaged in "misconduct or inappropriate behavior." Fulton intends to
investigate and address your report in accordance with its existing procedures for Ethics Point
~ e ~ o r t However,
s.
in order to assess the merit and substance of your report in accordance with
these ~rocedures.Fulton will reauire the "written details" to which you allude in that report.
Please note that specific details, not simply reference to your company's website, are required to
make this assessment. If the evidence in support of your report is the same as that to which you
refer in your December 13th letter, kindly provide a statement verifying that fact.
We ask that you provide the requested information within the next two weeks. The
information should be forwarded to this office and we will ensure that it is shared with Fulton.
Alternatively, you may enter the details of your Ethics Point Report and upload documents and
information related to the report directly on the Ethics Point site. We ask that you upload only
STAN
CATERBONE
of14
158
Advanced
Page17
8 of
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
STAN
CATERBONE
of14
158
Advanced
Page18
9 of
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
mailto:amgroup01@msn.com
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
December 13, 2007

Board of Directors
Fulton Financial Corporation
One Penn Square
P.O. Box 4887
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604
Re:
Formal request for the resignation of R. Scott Smith, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer
Dear Board of Directors:

I, Stanley J. Caterbone (shareholder) and Advanced Media Group, would like to formally request that
R. Scott Smith, Jr., tender his resignation as Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer of Fulton Financial
Corporation effective immediately.
I have enough evidence of negligence, incompetence, and possible criminal conduct within the Fulton
Financial Corporation.
I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you in person, should you find the time and
courage to do so.
Respectfully,
Stan J. Caterbone
Visit Our Blog
Visit Our Video Biography
Copy to file
Deliver to Stephanie Carfley, Barley Snyder, LLC
STAN
CATERBONE
158
Advanced
Page19
10 of
of 14
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
Fulton Financial Corporatior?

,.
L
ONE PENN SQUARE, P.O. BOX 4887, LANCASTER. PENNSYLVANIA 17604
717-291-25M3 FAX 717-295533 2
R. Scon SMITH,JR.
CHAIRMAN
CHIEFEx=
November 14,2007
-A
AND ~ S I D M
Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone

t 250 Fmont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Dear Mr. Caterbone:
Thank you for taking a few moments to introduce yourself yesterday, as we passed on
the sidewalk. At the time of our m d g , I did not inmmdately recall in what
connection I recognized your name. Upon returning to my oBce, I realized that we had
previously corresponded on several subjects, and that you have filed a number of
lawsuits against Fulton Bank, some of which are still pending.
Unfortunately, given that you are actively engaged in litigation against Fulton Bank, I
will not be able to acummodate your request to schedule a meeting with me. If you
have any matters that you wish to communicate, please direct them to our counsel:
Stephanie Catfley
Barley Snyder, LLC
Lmcaster, PA 17602
Thank you for complying with our communicationpreference.
R. S ~ tSmith,
t
Jr.
Cbabnm, President and
Chief Executive Officer
.1
cc:
Stephanie M e y , Barley Snyder, LLC
STAN
CATERBONE
158
Advanced
Page20
11 of
of 14
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
STAN
CATERBONE
158
Advanced
Page21
12 of
of 14
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
My July 11th 2007 Post In It's Entirety
13-Dec-07 07:10 pm
"We dissatisfied shareholders need to collectively collaborate and formerly propose a management
plan to the Board of Directors.
This process will accomplish several tactics toward getting the Board of Directors to listen to our
concerns. First, it will be recorded. Secondly, when and if they violate our shareholder rights, they
can be held accountable. Thirdly, it will provide all participants with a benchmark for future
litigation against the present management if they are found negligent in their respective duties. This
could include performance issues and a decline in shareholder value.
If you want to study and research how this is done, review articles about Carl Ichan. He is often
viewed as an adversary until a comparison of his proposals with future results proves that he
proposed alternatives that would have succeeded in increasing shareholder value. He will often put
the Board of Directors in a position of being greenmailed.
advancedmed...
47/Male
Lancaster, ...
View Messages
Report Abuse
Advanced Media Group"
Rating :
(1 Rating)
STAN
CATERBONE
158
Advanced
Page22
13 of
of 14
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
Re: My July 11th 2007 Post In It's Entirety
14-Dec-07 10:48 am
First of all thank you for sending your letter to the BOD. I personally don't think you will get a
response as I have also sent many letters to R. Scott Smith and did not receive any response. Personally
I would like to bring a law suit against every BOD and R. Scott Smith. I would be more than willing to
contribute a few thousand dollars to make it happen. I also know a few other large shareholders that are
willing to contribute. As you know that untill someone stops this "Little Boys Club" in Lancaster our
stock will continue to decline. They must and will be stopped if I have anything to do with it. Looking
forward to your response.
P.S. Your right on the money with your charge of negligence and incompetence which also includes
the boaard members. Thanks much
Rating :
(No ratings)
Rate it:
1 star + unrated
who36juliet...
View
Messages
Ignore User
Report Abuse
5 stars
STAN
CATERBONE
158
Advanced
Page23
14 of
of 14
Monday, January
11,
January
25,2016
2008
mailto:amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Monday, February 21, 2005

Project Hope
Mr. Stan Caterbone
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
Mr. Scott Smith
Fulton Financial Corporation
One Penn Square
P.O. Box 4887
Lancaster, PA 17604
Dear Mr. Smith:

The reason I had called you on Friday morning was to discuss an outstanding issue with
you. I am not threatening you or coming to you as an adversary but rather just trying to
understand how your institution can be so cold and rude to my family. On Thursday I visited the
Manor Branch to discuss the account for Tom's Project Hope, our non-profit foundation which
advocates awareness for suicide prevention, with a focus for teenagers. Of course this foundation
was founded after the suicide of my youngest brother, Tom, in 1996.
Well, I never had so much trouble trying to gain access to our account's statements than I
did on that day. All that I heard was how much I would have to pay to get copies of the
statements. Which in itself is a little disheartening, considering we are a non-profit giving
something back to the community. We are a major donor for CONTACT Lancaster. And it is this
attitude that inspired me to address the very reason Tom's Project Hope was unfortunately
founded.
I had asked the Customer Service person what would happen if I made an attempt to
deposit a check in an account that did not have funds available at that time. She said "we have to
give you the choice to deposit the check or wait until there are funds". I said are you sure, she
said "oh yes, you have the choice to make the deposit or not". I said that is what I thought was
the policy or rule.
Mr. Scott Smith

February 21, 2005
Page 2
In 1996 my brother, Tom, had his accounts with your bank. He was given a check in the
amount of approximately $60,000 ($70,285.00) by an account from Ms. John Depatto. Forgive me
but I do not have the energy to retrieve all of the details at this time. My brother went to the
Manor Branch to deposit that check, and was refused on at least 3 occasions from making that
deposit. I know this because he was calling me asking for advise and help. I remember telling him
to seek legal counsel because this was not right. Your tellers refused to take the check for deposit
because there were no funds available. I kept telling him that this was wrong and that he should
make the deposit in case funds became available the check would be honored. But your tellers
kept refusing to make that deposit.
I then went on to learn that funds did become available and were paid to other entities that
had NSF checks waiting for funds, which would have been behind my brothers check had your
tellers accepted that deposit.
If you carefully review the financial problems my brother encountered prior to his death,
you would see that this was the one transaction that started a spiral of events that caused him a
great amount of stress and duress. And I know this because I was trying to help him. I eventually
took him to the emergency room of St. Joseph Hospital just 4 days prior to his death.
Now, Sir, you tell me how you would feel if you were in my position, and what would you
want to happen. I have kept this to myself for far too long, and since I have had my own
problems with your institution in a similar way back in 1987. I would like to understand why we
are treated like this, and ask that these matters be addressed.
Put yourself in my position, would you want anything less?
This is for my brother, Tom, God rest his soul.
Respectfully,
Stan J. Caterbone
Project Hope
cc: Fulton Financial Board of Directors
Sheet1
Sheriff Sale Price
Principal Balance at Time of Default
$156,000.00
$88,563.88
Fulton Bank Payoff
$129,972.59
Sheriff Fee
$5,021.57
Transfer Tax Fee
$3,699.04
Sale Price 30 Days After Sheriff Closing
$195,000.00
Fulton Bank Cumulative Fees
$41,408.71
Premium Made by Parula After 30 Days
$39,000.00
Total Equity Lost Less Reasonable Interest Expense
$77,430.28
Proceeds if sold privately using Parula Sale Price
$102,737.08
Page 1
scaterbone@live.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
April 7, 2010 5:57am EST
To: Ms. Stephanie Carfley, Esquire of Barley Snyder, LLC.,
Re: Letter of April 6, 2010 Concerning The Safety Deposit Box Scandal
Dear Ms. Carfley,
First, could we please meet to discuss my response to your letter of April 6, 2010 at a place of
your choice? I believe this would help both of us reach some conclusion to this problem. Let me
know via a phone call at your earliest convenience at (717) 826-5354(voice mail) or 717-669-2163
cell phone.
As I recall I was instructed to only have contact with you with regards to issues of this nature;
and in the event you were not made aware of the email on the morning of March 22, 2010 I notified
Phil Wenger that I to meet with you from the incident of March 19, 2010 which may or may not be an
issue regarding the No Trespass Notice. The following is the contents of that email:
March 24, 2010
Phil, Tell Fernando that I had already taken care of the matter. Sorry for the
inconvenience, however, I am going to meet with Stephanie Carfly to resolve this
matter. Thank You anyway.
I will not deal with any Security Officer of Fulton Financial Corporation. It is a means of
insinuating false representations regarding my relationship and behavior at Fulton Bank offices and
branches. Remember, I filed a very detailed and thorough Complaint of Ethics Violations regarding
Fulton Bank employees back in 2008. Fulton Bank employees are trying to twist the truth of my
conduct v. their conduct.
I have a host of questions for Fulton Financial Corporation, the following are a few:
1. There was no 30 days Notice, you took sole possession of my safety deposit boxes on March
24, 2010.
2. What is the reason for the no trespass notice?
3. Is it in retaliation for my shareholder activism with regards to "FULT"?
4. Is this an effort to have the contents of my safety deposit boxes stolen from my insecure
home?
5. How could I trust another financial institution if Fulton Financial and Fulton Bank are allowed to
get away with this?
6. What about all of the damages I suffered due to this scandal?
7. What about my attorney fees?
I cannot accept the contents of my 3 Safety Deposit Boxes knowing the risk to theft;
vandalism; and the like that exits.
This is what I must request from Fulton Financial Corporation, or FFC, and Fulton Bank:
1. Fulton Financial Corporation (FFC) and Fulton Bank adhere to the agreements signed
and executed for the three (3) safety deposit boxes and demand that those
agreements are continued without interruption. FFC is maliciously motivated to place the
security of the contents of the safety deposit boxes in harms way, which no other location
could afford such security for the Petitioner's. In the event the contents are lost or stolen, all
the defendant's would instantaneously become unjustly enriched due to the adverse
consequences the Petitioner's would suffer without the legal files required for current or
pending litigation. I am also in desperate need of the cash assets to sustain the basic
necessities and to continue it's current litigation and criminal prosecution of the perpetrators of
crimes already outlined in other court documents.
2. I am also seeking assurances that the safety deposit boxes were not opened and
3. All court related evidence was not tampered with, if not then financial sanctions should
be imposed and
4. Summary judgment should be granted to I with regards to all previous litigation involving
Fulton Financial and or Fulton Bank as named parties.
If not the above, then I must request the following:
1. The safe return of all of the contents of my safety deposit box contents to 1250 Fremont
Street after the following have been executed and completed:
2. The purchase of a safe from Russell Locksmith, Lancaster Pennsylvania, selected by

myself including delivery to store the contents of the 3 safety deposit boxes and future needs.
3. An agreement with installation and payment for a one-year period of a security

system at 1250 Fremont Street of an approved Security System and Monitoring Company.
4. The purchase of an insurance policy covering my contents at 1250 Fremont Street.
5. I request that FFC pay all attorney fees and court costs for all past litigation with the I
that began on May 16, 2005 with Case No. 05-2288 in the U.S. Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
6. I request that FFC pay for the lost equity that resulted in the illegal Sheriff sale of
December 20, 2006 of the Petitioner's primary residence and home office at 220 Stone Hill
Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania.
7. I request that FFC contract with a thrid party with the SUPERVISION of the I the
digitizing of all INFORMATION ASSETS to an acceptable electronic format that can be
8. preserved for court related purposes and be filed as an Exhibit in Case No. 08-13373 in the
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
9. I request that FFC open a money market account, or any other interest bearing account
for the deposit of funds by the I and a TRADING ACCOUNT for Day Trading (Petitioner
has more than 2 FULL years Experience) with the stipulation that any irregularities are
reported to the proper authorities.
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
http://www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.advancedmediagroup.blogspot.com
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal
& Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992).
Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which
would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious
attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some
communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster
City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel?
Summation: Due to the actions and criminal activity of the foregoing (see Criminal Indictment Page), it is reasonable to
prove that every aspect of the Complainant's life, Stan J. Caterbone, is subject to undo influence; harassment; torture;
obstruction; etc. This situation and set of circumstances as outlined here, and in the page "State of Affairs" and all previous
filings; reports; and statements, is a prescription for only one endgame - death or suicide. There is no life action or activity that
is immune from this horrendous HATE CRIME. The precedent and landmark elements that make this so appalling is that the
Complainant has never done anything to set these circumstances in motion but to be right regarding International Signal &
Control back in 1987; as well as many other proclamations and forecasts. That being said, it is also widely reported that many
Targeted Individuals and Victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control are lead to death and/or suicide. The Lancaster CommunityAt-Large is guilty of creating; abetting; fostering; and executing this tragedy. The fact that local; state; and federal law
enforcement induce and encourage this environment of hate is landmark.
From: scarfley@barley.com
To: scaterbone@live.com; stancaterbone@gmail.com
CC: JBankert@fultonbank.com; SFollmer@fult.com
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:17:00 -0400
Subject: Caterbone -- Fulton Bank Safety Deposit Boxes
Mr. Caterbone,
Please see the attached letter, a copy of which is also being sent to you via first class mail.
Stephanie
_____________________________________
Partner
Barley Snyder LLC
[mailto:scarfley@barley.com]
Phone: (717) 399-1536
Fax (717) 291-4660
Barley Snyder LLC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Website: www.barley.com
To insure compliance with requirements imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in Circular
230, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachment
that does not explicitly state otherwise) is not intended to be written or to be used, and cannot be
used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or (ii)
promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this
communication.
THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE
INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION
THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER
APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. I you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message or by
sending an e-mail to barley@barley.com and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
Thank you.
Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 7 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Petitioner
vs.
LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CRISIS INTERVENTION, ET. AL.
Respondents
:
: CIVIL ACTION
:
:
: NO. 15-CV-3984
:
:
:
:
:
ORDER
AND NOW, this
2nd
day of September, 2015, upon
consideration of Petitioners Letter Request for Permission to

Register as an ECF Filing User in the ECF System, it is hereby
ORDERED that Petitioners Request is GRANTED and the Clerk of
Court is DIRECTED to process Petitioners registration pursuant
to Procedure 4(b) under Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5.1.2.
BY THE COURT:
s/J. Curtis Joyner

J. CURTIS JOYNER,
J.
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?893555632390011-L_1_0-1
CLOSED,HABEAS,A/R
United States District Court

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Allentown)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/ CRISIS INTERVENTION et al

Assigned to: HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER
related Case: 2:06-cv-05138-JCJ
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Date Filed: 07/17/2015

Date Terminated: 08/25/2015
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus: (General)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Petitioner
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
PRO SE
V.
Respondent
LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/ CRISIS
INTERVENTION
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
CRAIG STEDMAN
Respondent
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY
Respondent
DET. LT. CLARK BEARIWGER
Respondent
LANCASTER CITY POLICE
Respondent
FAIRMONT BEHAVIOR SYSTEM
Respondent
SILVIA GRATZ
CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
Respondent
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF
LANCASTER
Respondent
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Date Filed
# Docket Text
07/17/2015
1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE (NO IFP, NO FEE PAID). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover
Sheet)(jwl, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2015: # 2 Envelope) (jwl, ). Modified on 7/21/2015 (afm, ). (Entered: 07/20/2015)
07/24/2015
2 APPLICATION to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. Cert. of Service. (pr, )
(Entered: 07/24/2015)

1 of 2

9/15/2015 3:47 AM
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
07/31/2015
08/10/2015
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?893555632390011-L_1_0-1
3 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PETITIONER WITH A BLANK COPY OF THE COURT'S CURRENT
STANDARD FORM FOR FILING A PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 USC, SECTION 2254 AND BEARING THE ABOVECAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER; PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED;
AND PETITIONER SHALL SUBMIT THE FIVE DOLLAR ($5.00) FILING FEE TO THE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF
THE DATE OF THIS ORDER OR THIS ACTION WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER..
SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 7/28/15. 7/31/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE
PETITIONER WITH A BLANK COPY OF A 2254 PETITION FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS.(pr, ) (Entered: 07/31/2015)
Copy of Order dated 7/28/15, blank 2254 petition form and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to STANLEY J.
CATERBONE for the following reason: Return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward.(Re-sending to STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, 1250 FREMONT ST., LANCASTER, PA 17603) (pr, ) (Entered: 08/10/2015)
08/17/2015
4 NOTICE/MOTION of Change of Address by STANLEY J. CATERBONE(ti, ) (Entered: 08/18/2015)
08/19/2015
5 Revised Habeas Petition Forms returned filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(pr, ) (Entered: 08/20/2015)
08/25/2015
6 ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST CLAIMS; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE
THIS MATTER; AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J.
CURTIS JOYNER ON 8/25/15. 8/25/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(pr, ) (Entered: 08/25/2015)
09/04/2015
7 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO REGISTER AS AN ECF FILING USER IS GRANTED AND
THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROCESS PETITIONER'S REGISTRATION PURSUANT TO PROCEDURE 4(b)
UNDER L.R.C.P. 5.1.2.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 9/2/2015. 9/4/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, ) (Entered: 09/04/2015)
PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt
09/15/2015 03:46:06
PACER Login: am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:
Description:
Docket Report
Billable Pages: 2
Search Criteria: 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ

Cost:

2 of 2
0.20

9/15/2015 3:47 AM
Outlook.com - scaterbone@live.com
https://col131.mail.live.com/?tid=cmrUmIGFQb5RGM9QAjfeQUag2&f...
New
Reply
Delete
Archive
Junk
Sweep
Move to
Stan J. Caterbone
Categories
RE: OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

Folders
Susan Lindauer via LinkedIn (member@linkedin.com) 6/25/15
Inbox
To: Stan Caterbone
Social updates
Junk 2
Drafts
Sent
Deleted
Susan Lindauer
Author, Whistleblower, Founder of ENGAGE Global Action
AA Inbox 41
Deed and City Rehab
Stan,
Ebay and Online Purcha

Facebook
I want to reassure you that nobody would put you on a terror list as an email recipient from
a Muslim Group. You don't need to be afraid on that score. I'm sure you're okay.
Fax Folder 146

FFCHS Communications
Susan
Geek Squad 1
Go Fund Me 2
Lambert Case 14
LinkedIn 5
On 6/25/15, 4:00 AM, Stan Caterbone wrote:

-------------------Susan, Could they have put me on a Terrorist List? The following is an email that I sent to
the Lancaster City Police Department -
May-June Surge 51
Mind Control Research
Saved Sent
New folder
"Some years ago this Muslim group, http://www.ikhwanscope.net/

was found to have visited my website and was a follower on my twitter account. Back at
this time there were middle eastern people following me around Lancaster. I tried to warn
people on my blogs and social media that it was not a good idea to be torturing me like this
for the reason that it gives the Muslim community an opportunity to call our government
hypocrites when it comes to our foreign policy.
I have emailed about this and now I cannot find my files verifying and confirming that it
was a one way communication to me, not me to them.
Did you take this file to justify putting me on a terrorist list so that you can justify using
COINTELPRO on me?
I did manage to find a file with the following on that is dated January 8, 2010:"
Stan J. Caterbone
717-669-2163
Reply to Susan
Replying via your email application will message everyone in the conversation.
You are receiving member message notifications emails. Unsubscribe
This email was intended for Stan Caterbone (Victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control). Learn why we included this.
If you need assistance or have questions, please contact LinkedIn Customer Service.
2015, LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct. Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
Too many newsletters? You can unsubscribe.
2015 Microsoft
Terms
Privacy & cookies
Developers

1 of 1
English (United States)

9/15/2015 3:58 AM
STAN
CATERBONE
v. Fulton Bank Wrongful Death Page
158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page89
36 of
of 53
Monday, January 05.07.2007

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page90
37 of
of 53

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page91
38 of
of 53

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page92
39 of
of 53

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page93
40 of
of 53

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page94
41 of
of 53

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page95
42 of
of 53

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page96
43 of
of 53

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page97
44 of
of 53

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page98
45 of
of 53

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page99
46 of
of 53

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
100
of53158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page
47 of

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
101
of53158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page
48 of

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
102
of53158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page
49 of

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
103
of53158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page
50 of

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
104
of53158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page
51 of

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
105
of53158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page
52 of

11, 2016
STAN
CATERBONE
106
of53158
ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP
Page
53 of

11, 2016
Legal Argument for the Estate of Thomas P. Caterbone Re: Fulton Bank and Conestoga Title, Prepared by Stan J. Caterbone
Argument: (Diversion of Funds = Fulton Bank)

1. Plaintiff, (Conestoga Title), is using a technical deficiency found in the defendants,
(Country Funding), mortgage to support its claim that National Citys (Insured)
mortgage is a superior mortgage with first lien position.
2. At settlement on May 16, 1995 United Financial/Abstract United diverted funds from
Country Funding that were intended to satisfy the mortgage of Country Funding, thus
prompting Country Funding to challenge National Citys 1st lien position.
3. Conestoga Title and United Financial/Abstract United also had an agency relationship
during the transaction and settlement of May 16, 1995.
4. United Financial/Abstract United principals have since been charged and have
admitted guilt to the Lancaster County District Attorney to such a crime on May 16,
1995, the day of the settlement, which enacting the diversion of funds, which were
intended to satisfy Country Fundings mortgage.
5. Country Funding hereby claims that the criminal act of the diversion of funds by
United Financial/Abstract United, is the only reason that enables Conestoga Title to
make the claim of a technical deficiency in its efforts to provide National City
with a 1st lien position, resulting in Conestoga Title eluding any financial obligations
to Country Funding or National City.
6. Country Funding claims that Conestoga Title had a fiduciary relationship with United
Financial/Abstract United, acting as its agent at the time of settlement, and thus
should not be allowed to benefit from the criminal act , (the diversion of funds) by
claiming the technical deficiency of the Country Funding mortgage, to defend 1st lein
position of National City. The technical deficiency is only material to this dispute
because it is the direct result of a crime.
7. Conestoga Titles agency relationship with United Financial/Abstract United could be
construed as collusion if it were permitted to use the crime as a means of avoiding its
responsibility of providing National City with a 1st lien position by satisfying the
Country Funding mortgage with a $70,285.00 pay off. It would have financially
benefited by the criminal act of its own agent, United Financial/Abstract United
8. Country Funding was the victim of one crime when the funds were diverted at
settlement. Allowing Conestoga Title to avoid its financial responsibility and use
the crime to ultimately lead to its claim of the technical deficiency, would shift
the financial burden from Conestoga Title to Country Funding, the victim. Allowing
Conestoga Title to use the direct results of a crime to absolve its financial interest,
would then make Country Funding the victim of two crimes.
STAN
CATERBONE
107
of1158
Advanced
Page
1 of
Monday, January
11,in2016
Authored
1998
Advanced Media
Medi Group
GroupPress
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page11ofof51
51
Thursday, December 17, 2015
scaterbone@live.com
https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page
Page
12ofof
2
1 51
50
51
Thursday,
Friday, December 11,
17, 2015
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page3
23ofof51
50
51
Thursday,
17, 2015
Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246
District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664
May 21, 2009

To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.
Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page4
34ofof51
50
51
Thursday,
17, 2015
Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page
Page
45ofof
5
2 51
50
51
Thursday,
17, 2015
For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page
Page
56ofof
6
3 51
50
51
Thursday,
17, 2015
(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.
Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page
Page
67ofof
7
4 51
50
51
Thursday,
17, 2015
mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page
Page
78ofof
8
5 51
50
51
Thursday,
17, 2015
Richmond council passes resolution

supporting ban on space-based
weapons
May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page
Page
89ofof
9
8 51
50
51
Thursday,
17, 2015
dumb ideas, Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based
weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:
1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based

weapons
2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments
1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!

Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
910of
of
9of50
51
51
Thursday,
17, 2015
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
October 10, 2015
Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page11
10
ofof41
50
51
51
Page
111of
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010
Date Updated:
October 10, 2015
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
July 28, 2009

July 8, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page12
11
ofof41
50
51
51
Page
212of
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest.
From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.
The
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.
By
the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.
In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group.
And Again, the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.
Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.
The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct
witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle

Lambert.
In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate

murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 153400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page13
12
ofof41
50
51
51
Page
313of
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.
However, this time there was
no
MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions
of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.
The Complaint contained
allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact.
The Lancaster City Police
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.
The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page14
13
ofof41
50
51
51
Page
414of
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45

audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone.
In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.
Phil interviewed all living
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page15
14
ofof41
50
51
51
Page
515of
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.
After discussions with ISC and United
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.
However, money, power,
influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.
This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.
Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.
This
includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.
ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
INTERNATIONAL
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page16
15
ofof41
50
51
51
Page
616of
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?
Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James

Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, County.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page17
16
ofof41
50
51
51
Page
717of
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,

Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.
THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;
burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender
liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had
to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape.
uncovered and discovered to this day.
Information and findings are still being
Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.

Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page18
17
ofof41
50
51
51
Page
818of
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
Change the history of events and the truth.

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges.
During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least
twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.
This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page19
18
ofof41
50
51
51
Page
919of
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND

WEAPONS.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.
Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.
See attached documents for
more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page10
19
20
20of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.
He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and
Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke

and with a severe mental illness.
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.
Samuel Caterbone,
Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page11
20
21
21of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.
He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.
His
viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized
stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a
world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
In 1973 Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.
The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never
entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.
However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.
On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an
inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate.
The check was for some $70,000.00.
The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.
He was in perfect
health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,
former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page12
21
22
22of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.
By his own
admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.
Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending
Lancaster Catholic High School.
After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an
unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November.
While in the woods in
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.
It left him in the
Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.
The
The Schizophrenia
diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.
Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and
landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.
John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by
James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page13
22
23
23of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.
Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first
beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..
Over the
years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.
The same was true of his businesses.
Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a
$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.
There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;
every instance of the word
used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page14
23
24
24of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;
Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000
pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary
offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and
several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an
exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as
plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local
courts.
There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate
PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:

www.freedomffchs.com
https://www.scribd.com
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page15
24
25
25of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW

** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently
been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are
using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is
often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.
Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay
secretive for so long.
This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television
drama "Medium" this last season.
On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live
broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.
Dated: July 28, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
The following are no longer in service:
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page16
25
26
26of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page17
26
27
27of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.

Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one of
the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration
has a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with
ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &
Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline
regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in
my Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his
relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert
Gates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth
questions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members
of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISC
and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa
and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here a
few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,
Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,
National Security Agency:
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a supersecret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listening
posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA
made sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma
Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in
1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms
to stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify its
efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its
top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the
father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began
regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,
1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, from
January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,
including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal
and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the
agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy
Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of
remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according to
Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),
former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control
industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page18
27
28
28of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page19
28
29
29of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page20
29
30
30of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:
I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.
The
whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.
Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page31
21
30
31ofof51
41
50
51
Thursday,
Saturday,
Friday, December
October 10,
11,
17, 2015
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page32
31
32ofof51
50
51
Thursday,
17, 2015
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page33
32
33ofof51
50
51
Thursday,
17, 2015
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page34
33
34ofof51
50
51
Thursday,
17, 2015
scaterbone@live.com
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST

STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
December 6, 2015
Work-In-Progress
Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.
1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
Advanced Media
Medi Group
GroupPress
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page35
35ofof51
51
14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice

15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19.Lancaster General Hospital, Gary S. Gehman, MD, May 25, 2010, for recording Dr. Brian
Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Health re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and posting on my
Wordpress Blog.
20.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
21. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police
Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,
Debra Hoeckler
22.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
with no reason and no written notice.
23.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
24.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
25.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain
regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.
26.Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Nortwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,
Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged in
Discrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to Legal
Counsel, and female who took complaint would not provide ID.
Dated: December 6, 2015
Advanced Media
Medi Group
GroupPress
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page36
36ofof51
51
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page27
36
37
37of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page28
37
38
38of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page29
38
39
39of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
! "
"
$% &
!
" #
%
"&#
(
'
!
(
,
"
"
")
"
""
-
)
!
! "
!
'
%
" !
"
!
)
+
!
" *
"
"
,
,
,
*
%
*
(
%
!
/"0
1
1 ,
"
"
4
!
"
"
!
!
#
.
.
&,,0
%
1 ,
2"3
!
)
** ! "
&,,..$/
&,,
%
&,,
%
&
, "
"
00
"
!,
"
6
7
7 , !
&,,-
8,
:
(
$;$
"2
! " ,
, ,
** !
;
5
$
!
&,,@
,
.
&<;=
>
1
9
,
&,,=
$
,
>
A
1 B3
.+
&,,=
1 B3
2
>
%
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page30
39
40
40of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
<
1
1
* "
!
"
C#
"$
"
<
*
&, ,
24
#9
; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%
&,,0 4
! %3
"
"
!
&,,
%
!
4
'
5
4
D
%
%
"
""
,! "
0 =
0 =9
9
00&9 00
:
9
&,,-
&, , $
!
%
!
D
%
%
=
F
!
))
+
/4
),
"
0 =
/
$
G
3
%
00
3
3
"
%#
$
$
&, ,
&,,4
!- "
.
&,,@
,
*
&,,<
E
&,,
-) !
/ 4
24
/
$
D
&, ,
D
$
&,,-
&,,0
%
D
!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D
$
A
8F
$
%
;
D
.
%
&,,3
E
$
*
00=; 00
$
5
! 7
0 =
00
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page31
40
41
41of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
)
A
24
$;$
00
(F
&
%
B
5
00 9
" * <
00=( 00 9
:#
> ) "" ""

$
;3
#, " !
&,,-
"
"
/
.
$
B
3
3
=
0 =
) "
0 =
&, ,
0 =
24
" "
3
.
&,,1
"
"
&,,@
" E
""
B
$
<
&,,1
.
&,,-
,-(&&
2
=
@,
"
&,
3
&,,!
&,,@
&,,@
0 =
@, 1
&,,@
9
!
@,
#" !,
0 =
" "1 ,
"
"*
":
" E
F
&,,-
!
B
/
!
"
00=( 00 9
B
:
9
$
'
.
&,,1
9
0 =
&, ,
/
.
00 9
/
&,,9
&,
( "
!
.
00
$
!
&, ,
F
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
3
7
8
!
&,,
&, ,
Page
Page32
41
42
42of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
&
, * "
&&
*#
"
&:
;!
&<
:
%
$
&, ,
$
&,,-
!-
,
5
%
"
>
$
$
< !-
24
? "
;
>
&,,0
B
&,,%
(
$
&, ,
&-
A
.+ $
&@
! :
&,,$
: , *
&, ,
* @
&,,@
"
E
3
&,,
"
&,,0
7 "!
7 "
0 =
*
&=
) "
":
)"
&,,@
"
&
&0
!
< ")
+
9 &,,@
:
9
&, ,
&,,
00
:,
!6
"
"
" .
9 &,,0
0 = "&#
, *
&,,@
/
" F
0 =
;A
0 =
F
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
0 =
Page
Page33
42
43
43of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
3
"
$
+
$
.
0 =
I $
!
0 =
.
$
"2
'
+$;F
D
"$
&,;&,
3
A
00
'
$ 24
"1E1# $
K
E
A
00&
>
L
F
F
B
F
+
0=,K
A
$
$
1
+
>
1
$
>
B
!
3
F
1
00
) % 3
&,,-
!
>
! A !
00,K
1 B3
>
F
F
& 1
F
8
! 4
'
A
! 4
A
0=,K
F
00,K
0 ,K
0<,K
3
/
>
%
&,,
) %$
D 1
"
$
0 <9 F
0@,K
0@,K
$
2!
A? D!B
#
*
$
7
+
00
D 18
.
E
$
M 1
00= E
0 =
%
0 ,K
$
0 =
M
00
!
&,,9
(
9
!
1
,-(
$ !2B+EF2
(&&
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page34
43
44
44of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
") !
"
7!
N
.
!
5
F
(
(
5
G
*
A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!
,
B
A
" " * #" !, " "
$C
* #" !, D
73
8
* 7
,
"
"
&
"
#
.
"
#(
5
7
9
'
5
%
7A
8 !
8 !
'
!
7D .2
O
% 8
'
7
'
(
(
%
%
4
K
K
M %
%
K
'
7E
(
8
"
%
'
%(
(
(
4
;
(
7
7
87
(
(
8
8
- 7 > !,
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page35
44
45
45of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
* , "
!
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B
@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
B@
)
B@
DD
!
!
))
1"
)
*
!
")
1
3
1
"
)
)
, "
*"
"
, "
!
*
"
")
"
7
"!
"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "
*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !
)
*
"E
DD
")
E DD
%
,
!
!"
, "
"
"
"
1 ,"
DD
*)
PPPPPPP "
>7
%#
'?
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
June 19, 2015

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP
15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC
I
.
I
&, ,
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page36
45
46
46of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Don't Know When
24
$
$
Q &, , "!
I
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page
Page37
46
47
47of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Page 35 of 41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
06/10/2007
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page
Page38
47
48
48of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Page 36 of 41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
06/10/2007
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page39
48
49
49of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page40
49
50
50of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,
Advanced Media
Medi Group
Grop Press
Group
PressRelease
Release
Page
Page41
50
51
51of
of51
50
51
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
11,
17, 2015
2015
Saturday,
October 10,

Fulton & Conestoga Title Abstract Arguement Prepared by Stan J. Caterbone For Steve Caterbone in Tom Caterbone Estate Matters in 1998

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Fulton & Conestoga Title Abstract Arguement Prepared by Stan J. Caterbone For Steve Caterbone in Tom Caterbone Estate Matters in 1998

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Legal Argument for the Estate of Thomas P.

Argument: (Diversion of Funds = Fulton Bank)

126 East King Street

Stephanie Carfley, Esquire

Letter to Board of Directors and Ethics Point Report

Dear Mr. Caterbone:

STAN CATERBONE v. Fulton Bank Wrongful Death Page 2 of 158

Monday, January 11, 2016

STAN CATERBONE v. Fulton Bank Wrongful Death Page 3 of 158

Monday, January 11, 2016

STAN CATERBONE v. Fulton Bank Wrongful Death Page 4 of 158

Monday, January 11, 2016

check for six thousand dollars in June. SHE LOOKED AT ME,

STAN CATERBONE v. Fulton Bank Wrongful Death Page 5 of 158

Monday, January 11, 2016

She informed me that the account would be brought current that

STAN CATERBONE v. Fulton Bank Wrongful Death Page 6 of 158

Monday, January 11, 2016

PO. BOX 4887

LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA 17604

March 25, 2005

Mr. Stan J. Caterbone

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

January 25, 2008

With Kindest Regards,

Barley Snyder LLC

Stephanie Carfley, Esquire

Letter to Board of Directors and Ethics Point Report

Dear Mr. Caterbone:

Lancaster York Harrisburg Reading Berwyn Hanover

cc: George R. Barr, Jr.

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

Dear Ms. Carfley:

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se

126 East King Street

Stephanie Carfley, Esquire

Letter to Board of Directors and Ethics Point Report

Dear Mr. Caterbone:

December 13, 2007

Dear Board of Directors:

Fulton Financial Corporatior?

ONE PENN SQUARE, P.O. BOX 4887, LANCASTER. PENNSYLVANIA 17604

717-291-25M3 FAX 717-295533 2

Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone

Stephanie M e y , Barley Snyder, LLC

My July 11th 2007 Post In It's Entirety

Re: My July 11th 2007 Post In It's Entirety

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

Monday, February 21, 2005

Dear Mr. Smith:

STAN CATERBONE v. Fulton Bank Wrongful Death Page 24 of 158

Monday, January 11, 2016

Mr. Scott Smith

STAN CATERBONE v. Fulton Bank Wrongful Death Page 25 of 158

Monday, January 11, 2016

Fulton Bank Payoff

Transfer Tax Fee

Sale Price 30 Days After Sheriff Closing

Fulton Bank Cumulative Fees

Premium Made by Parula After 30 Days

Total Equity Lost Less Reasonable Interest Expense

Proceeds if sold privately using Parula Sale Price

STAN CATERBONE v. Fulton Bank Wrongful Death Page 26 of 158