Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Purnama Alamsyah
Kusnandar
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Content
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology
Result and Discussion
Conclusion
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Introduction
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Introduction
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Introduction (2)
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Literature Review
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Literature Review
Benefits of biogas
Drivers and barrier of biogas implementation
Financing of domestics biogas plant (Financing
environment, Financing channels, Financing
instruments, financial scheme)
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Methodology
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Methodology
Literature Review
Individual interview
On-site survey
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Methodology (2)
10
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
11
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
General Model
Biogas Waste
+
Output
Biogas Digester
Investment +
Rate of Adoption
B2
+
Investment cash
usage
Cash -
Cattle business
+
+
Cost of Biogas
Investment
B1
+
+
+
Cost of Biogas
Business capital
+
desire
+ Business capital
usage
+ Income
Subsystem of waste
Negative
feedback.
biogas
residues or bio-slurry. If it is not
taken care properly, it would
pollute the environment. Even
though is not as smelly as before,
it would still pollute the river and
other waterways as disposal sites.
+
Biogas Output
R1
-
Expenditure for
Living
+
+
Pollution
+
Positive
Image
for
Biogas Digester
Subsystem of Cost
Negative feedback. investment cost would
surely disrupt the financial cash of the farmers
that mostly are intended for their business
capital. The disruption of the cash would bring
impact to the reduction of their business capital
and in turn would lessen their income as well.
The lessen income would then decrease the
income ratio to expenditures, would also
decrease the positive image
13
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Grants Model
Biogas Waste +
Output
Biogas Digester
+
Investment
Availability of
Grant
+
+
+
+
Biogas Output
Grant
from
Rate of Adoption
Investment cash
Cost of Biogas
Government
usage
Investment
+
B
Cattle business
+
Cash
+
+
Expenditure for
+
Business capital
Cost of Biogas
Living
+
desire
+
Business capital
+ Income + Ratio of Income and
usage
Expenditure
+
Pollution
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Credit Model
Assistance and training
program
Technique of
organic fertilizer
organic fertilizer
promotion
+
+
Production desire
Of organic fertilizer
+
organic fertilizer
production
+
Supply chain system
for organic fertilizer
+
market for organic
+
fertilizer
Biogas Digester
Investment
+
Biogas Waste
+
+
Output
Raw material
potential of organic
fertilizer
Credit for Digester
Technology
+
+
Cost of Biogas
Investment
Rate of Adoption
+
Quality of
Digester
+
Investment
+
+ Biogas Output
cash usage
Cattle business
+
+
Kas +
+
+
+
Price of Digester
Business capital
Cost
of
Biogas
Expenditure for
+
desire
Living
+
Business capital
+
+ Income + Ratio of Income and
usage
Expenditure
farming cost
+
-
organic fertilizer
+
+
Organic
fertilizer
selling
-
Pollution
+
-
Higher technology with greater biogas output, along with applied credit
system and subsidies are expected to increase the number of biogas digester
adoption. However, there is a question about the biogas utilization as energy
source has greater value than the cuts of milk payment for credits?
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
16
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Conclusions
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Some Conclusions
18
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
19
PAPPIPTEK
Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan Iptek
Thank you !