Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Fall 2004
J. Kilborn
PART ONE: The Creditor-Debtor Relationship
Chapter One Creditors Remedies Under State Law
I. Assignment 1: Remedies of Unsecured Creditors under State Law
a. What is an Unsecured Creditor?
i. An unsecured creditor does not receive secured status because either there is no
contract with the debtor or secured status is not statutorily granted.
ii. When an unsecured creditor has obtained judgment of liability, it does not change
the status of the unsecured creditor, but gives them title of judgment creditor.
b. How Do Unsecured Creditors Compel Payment? / Limitations on Compelling Payment.
i. Concerned with the avoidance of violence when collecting.
ii. You cannot make threats, etc. to collect on this
iii. The sheriff cannot seize all of the property, because there are exemptions in LA.
For instance, you have a motor vehicle exemption of one per house.
iv. Think of the difficulties for a creditor to get paid. (Exemptions are not on the test,
but know that are in the exception)
v. No assets means there are no attachable assets.
vi. All you can seize is their interest in the house and none of the bank in the
mortgage (equity is all that you can take; however many states have a homestead
exemption in LA you have a $25K exception on equity).
vii. You can garnish the wages, which will probably also have problems, because they
may not make enough thus, enforceability is a problem.
II.
Assignment 2: Security
a. The Nature of Security
i. Purpose of security devices
1. Give creditor security that obligation will be paid when time comes to pay.
a. Allows the creditor to avoid an exemption.
b. Allows cor to avoid the long process of litigation and puts a reservation
on the property. encourages lender to lend.
ii. 4 kinds of secured transactions:
1. The property subject to the S/Dev is moveable and the S/Dev is consensual.
Art. 9 of the UCC. LA has modified this in a few ways. (In CH. 9 of Title
X in LA.)
2. Consensual S/Dev in immovable property (Mortgage). LA this is in the civil
code and in the ancillaries of the code (Vol 1 & 2 of CC).
3. Non-consensual device the law will impose a security device. In LA this is
a Lien; outside of LA this is a privilege. This is accessory to the principle
obligation.
4. Accessory Personal Right Right against a person and not property. This
person is called a guarantor/surety.
1
III.
I.
c.
d.
e.
II.
vi.
c.
i.
d.
e.
Products
1. The product of collateral is something the collateral produces. The term is
most commonly used in the context of agriculture. Is has been held that wool
is the product of sheep, milk the product of cows, and maple syrup the
product of trees.
2. Products may include proceeds, but that is unclear
ii. Profit, rents, and offspring are other value-tracing words.
iii. 9-203(f) proceeds are included impliedly when description of collateral does
not mention them.
Non-Value-Tracing Concepts
i. This includes After Acquired Property, Replacements, Additions, and
Substitutions in that they can pick up property acquired by the debtor with value
not derived from the previously existing collateral.
Problem Set 10 10.1, 10.2, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6
IV.
V.
b.
c.
d.
VI.
b.
b. Investment Property;
c. Life insurance policy (LA Only 10:9-107.1)
2. Control 3 Ways: (9-104)
a. Bank who holds account has control;
b. Creditor enters into agreement with bank to agree to orders of creditor
(Most common)
c. Bank becomes Joint account holder.
i. 9-106 Control by delivery is preferred method to have property
held (Possess. and having registered on books)
ii. However, it is rare that this will happen in real world.
iii. Purchase Money Security Interest (PMSI) in consumer goods
1. 9-309(1) only need to know (1)
2. 9-102 Consumer goods are bought or used for primarily personal, family
or household use.
3. PMSI Sec. int. that secures the repayment of money actually used to pay
for collateral.
4. Some collateral is not covered by article 9, but LA is more expansive (like
life insurance major advantage of LA)
Problem Set 19 19.1
Assignment 23: Maintaining Perfection Through Changes of Name, Identity and Use
a. Changes In The Debtors Name
i. 9-507(c) Effects of Changes to names on filing of statements
1. When the change becomes seriously misleading, the sec. int. is still effective
as to all property acquired within or before four months after the seriously
misleading change.
2. Unless the fin. statement is amended within four months of such change, all
property acquired after the four month period is not secured.
ii. Distinguish chg. of name from the transfer of collateral to a new debtor 9-507(a)
b. Changes Affecting the Description Of The Collateral
i. Type 1 Changes
1. Change in circumstances that did not control the place of filing but that does
make the collateral difficult for searcher to ID.
a. (i.e. Chg. In use of item inventory Equipment)
2. 9-507(b) Provides that the fin. stmt. remains effective even when the
change in circumstances has made the stmt. misleading.
ii. Type 2 Changes
1. One that is sufficient to affect the method of perfection that would have been
appropriate for the initial filing.
2. 9-507(b) excuses a misdescription, but not other filing requirement.
a. (e.g. car as inventory, then used as equipment, but failed to issue
certificate of title noting sec. int.)
c. Exchange of the collateral
9
i.
ii.
iii.
Barter Transactions
1. The exchange of one commodity for another in a transaction in which no cash
is involved. The rules in 315(d)(1) governing perfection in a barter exchange
are different from the rules governing perfection in an exchange for cash that
is then used to purchase the commodity. There are three types of barters:
a. Type 0 i. The proceeds received by the debtor fall w/in the description of
collateral in the already-filed fin. stmt. 9-203(f)
ii. After this type of barter, the secured creditor has a perfected SI in the
new collateral on the basis of the description; and need not rely on
9-315 at all
b. Type 1
i. Exchange of collateral for proceeds in the form of property not
covered by the description in the fin. stmt.
ii. Property in which sec. int. could be perfected by filing in the office
where secured creditors fin. stmt. is already on file.
iii. In this type of barter, the secured party remains perfected without a
new filing. The rule is contained in 9-315(d)(1).
c. Type 2
i. Exchange of collateral for non-cash proceeds of a type in which
filing is required in a filing office other than the one in which the
original collateral was perfected by filing.
ii. To be perfected in these proceeds at all, the secured party must refile.
iii. To be continuously perfected so that it has one perfection dating from
the time of the filing on the original collateral, the secured party must
make these filings within 20 days from the time the debtor receives
the proceeds. 9-315(d)(3).
Collateral to Cash Proceeds to Non-cash Proceeds
1. The debtor may exchange the original collateral for money, then use the
money to buy collateral. Provided it can trace its value through both
transactions, the creditors SI will reach the new property as proceeds of
proceeds. 102(a)(12) and (64).
a. Type 0 The rule is the same as in a barter transaction: the original
filing remains effective to cover goods of the same description.
b. Type 1 The exchange results in collateral that is no longer covered
by the original description in the FS.
i. 9-315(d)(3) requires that the secured party file a FS to cover the
new collateral.
ii. 2nd filing w/in 20 days of the debtors receipt of the new property, the
2nd filing is effective as of the date of the first filing and perfection is
continuous thereafter.
iii. 2nd filing after the 20 day period - dates from the time it was made.
c. Type 2 Changes are treated like type 1 Changes
Collateral to Cash Proceeds
1. the debtor may simply sell the original collateral and keep the cash.
10
d.
e.
f.
Example:
ABC Co.
i. Fin. Stmt.:
1. Accounts
2. Inventory
3. Fixtures.
Bank
Dec. 17 largest account debtor paid money to ABC (Big Store) they then used to buy a Hiro
Painting for $350,000.
After Acquired Collateral clause make note for Bar Exam, but in reality will have this
Security Interest? Yes they do 9-315(a)(2) shows that they have an interest in the proceeds.
Perfected? Does the Financing Stmt. Mention the painting? This is equipment under the
UCC, and the Fin. Stmt. Fails to mention it. 9-315(d)(1) is an option You could file to perfect
an interest in the painting, but the UCC says that if you see cash at any point (d)(1) will not help
you. (d)(2) this is not identifiable cash or proceeds. (d)(3) Financing statement does not
include equipment, and it is not any of the other things listed so, not perfected. (D) shows
how they had 20 days to file a new fin. Stmt. To include the painting. However they did not, so
no perfection of security interest.
Continuously? Have to ask these three questions in reverse
What if the debtor exchanges the collateral for something else? The exchanged goods are
proceeds, so the SI continues, but what about perfection? Kilborn says there are three
tests, 9-315(d). If the debtor exchanges the collateral for proceeds and the SI in the
collateral was perfected, the SI in the proceeds is perfected for twenty days. After 20
days, it becomes unperfected if it isnt perfected under one of three tests:
a. The original SI was perfected by filing, and if a SI in the proceeds can be
perfected by filing in the same office as the original collateral and filing
for the collateral is good, and the exchange was a straight exchange,
goods for goods.
b. Cash proceeds are automatically continuously perfected until they
become something else.
c. You perfect independently within 20 days to keep continuous perfection.
A FS already filed can still be okay as long as it adequately describes the
new collateral.
Make sure that you have got all of this this is the apex of the course. Kilborn says that
this is the most difficult part of the course.
VIII.
a.
b.
c.
12
d.
IX.
e.
NOTE: We are concerned with maintaining perfection in the collateral and not with the
sec. interest. Even without perfection, the security interest continues, but it will lose
priority without proper perfection.
c.
d.
e.
f.
XI.
Assignment 32: Secured Creditors Against Secured Creditors (Most Common Scenario)
9-322; 9-317
a. The Basic Rule: The First to File or Perfect 9-322
i. Rule 1 If both secured creditors are unperfected, the first to attach wins.
ii. Rule 2 A perfected sec. creditor beats an unperfected
iii. Rule 3 As between two secured creditors who have done everything the first
of those creditors to either file a financing statement OR perfect wins.
b. Priority of Future Advances
i. Assuming that the financing statement properly covers these as part of the
collateral, all advances made by the secured creditor to the debtor have priority as
of the filing of the financing statement. 9-322(a)(1) implicit in this.
c. Priority in After-Acquired Property
i. Filing covers the security interests when the sec. agreement describes the
collateral broadly. When described specifically, upon acquisition the security
interest attaches to the collateral.
ii. A security interest has the same priority WRT after-acquired property that it has
WRT the original collateral. 9-322(a)(1) Time of filing
d. Priority of PMSI (This is an exception to above rules)
i. Generally
14
e.
f.
g.
XII.
c.
a. You have to be buying from someone in the business of selling that thing.
Can only be a buyer in the ordinary course of inventory, you cannot be a
buyer of equipment. AND must be in ordinary course of inventory
sellers business.
3. Buyer in ordinary course must meet the following criterion to take free of any
previously perfected sec. int.:
a. Purchase made for new value.
b. Buy in good faith cannot be trying to undermine someones rights.
c. Without knowledge that the sale violates the secured creditors rights.
You can know that a sec. int. exists in the thing bought. (Diff. avg.
buyer would have no idea that the thing violates the rights of the creditor
usually not a violation b/c the creditor would allow this)
4. The sec. int. of which you are taking free must have been created by the
buyers seller. (Ex where not true: when dealer 2 sells X to another dealer,
when X had an sec. int. attached b/c not in the ordinary course of business
to sell between dealers)
5. Cannot take free of a int. in farm products cannot buy a farm product free
and clear will not look to why this is b/c of separate law just know it.
6. The inventory that the buyer is buying cannot be in the possession of the sec.
creditor.
iii. Consumer to Consumer Sale Exception 9-320(b) AKA Garage Sale Exception
1. The goods must be consumer goods (for personal use) in the hands of the
seller and the buyer to fit within this exception.
2. If the buyer does not have knowledge of the sec. int. and the sec. int. is
unperfected, the buyer takes free and clear.
a. In LA knowledge does not matter, only the failure to file matters.
Problem Set 36 36.1, 36.2, 36.3(a);
16
b.
c.
2. Mineral Rights Category called as extracted collateral this is oil, gas and
mineral rights which are included in a sec. agreement and the interest does
not attach until the minerals are extracted.
3. Crops Distinction in crops that are owned by the landowner and not owned
by him. If a sec. int. is given in these, then they are moveable by
anticipation. The only law that applies is article 9. So, you cannot get a
mortgage on crops, because it is not an immovable property right. 9-344(i)
makes this clear.
iii. Issue arises between the mortgage holders and the person with a sec. int. in a
component part to the building (fixtures).
Fixtures
i. Generally (348)
1. First, you have to determine what will be included within this? Will
component parts be included in this? On Final, (o)note that this is an issue
2. Goods are fixtures when the have become so related to particular real prop.
that an interest in them arises under real property law. 9-102(a)(41)
3. Distinction between this and lien is that he lien encumbers the entire
property; whereas, a sec. int. in a fixture only encumbers that fixture.
ii. How Does a Secured Creditor Perfect in Fixtures (350-355)
1. Outside LA:9-334(e)
a. By Mortgage on the property,
b. By Article 9 Fixture Filing, OR
c. Filing an ordinary financing statement in the UCC personal property
filing system, a sec. creditor can perfect a security int. in goods that are
fixtures. 9-501 does not require filing in real estate records to perfect
in fixtures.
d. Distinguish the following:
i. Difference from a Normal financing statement is that it describes the
immovable property of which the fixture is attached.
ii. Other big difference is that fixture filings are made in the mortgage
filings. Thus, it must be filed in the mortgage records in the county
where the immovable property is located as opposed to the state
level.
2. In LA (ONLY) 3 specific rules/exceptions:
a. Must get your fixture filing on file prior to the moveable becoming fixed
to the immovable. You lose your security interest all together if you
allow it to become fixed prior to filing.
b. Consumer goods that currently are or will become component parts are
not at all subject to Article 9. You can acquire a mortgage interest in
them, but you have no other way to get a security interest in them.
c. A fixture filing is not made in the parish where the immovable is
located a fixture filing is made in the normal UCC records in any
parish, and not the mortgage records.
Priority of Article 9 Fixture Filings (549-551) 9-334 who wins?
i. Sections of 9-334 do not apply in LA So read comment on this!!!
ii. Outside LA Highpoints of 9-334
17
d.
e.
f.
XIV.
XV.
18
ii.
b.
c.
The Tax lien statute Trumps UCC 9, because of supremacy clause (IRS Tax is Fed
Law).
iii. Able to beat sec. creditors in narrow circumstances:
1. When does a tax lien arise? It arises against the debtor as soon as the tax is
assessed and extends to all of debtors movable and immovable property.
a. What does it mean, when it has been assessed? One of two ways:
i. If taxpayer has filed a return admitting his or her tax, when it is
signed off on by an agent, then it has been assessed.
ii. (More common) tax is assessed if the taxpayer does not admit
liability 90 days after the IRS mails notice of deficiency.
b. As of the day that it arises, they can come and take anything they want to
settle the debt. Remember, that the b/r statutes have exemptions, but the
IRS is federal and trumps those exemptions. Further, there are fewer tax
exemptions.
2. When is it perfected? The IRS has to give notice of tax lien and file notice
w/clerk of court (La.) to perfect their interest and it is in effect against third
parties from that point forward.
Competitions Involving Federal Tax Liens
i. Priority what if you have an already perfect sec. int.? The same priority rule
that you would expect for a lien creditor is here. A perfected sec. int. prior to the
tax lien beats the IRS WRT current property/collateral on the day of the tax lien
notice filing. Perfection upon FILING notice of tax lien.
1. IRS gets a couple of exceptions to this:
a. After acquired collateral IRS takes adv of a Doctrine known as
Cohateness. If a prior perfected sec. creditor has an interest in after
acquired collateral, the Cohateness Doctrine steps in to say that the IRS
wins over everyone WRT property acquired after the tax lien.
Essentially retroactive ranking occurs with IRS in the lead.
b. Future Advances The IRS does not beat all of these people, the rule is
similar to that of lien creditors. The difference here is that the rule is that
the sec. creditor will win against the IRS even WRT IRS. As long as the
future advance is in conformance with the agreement, the sec. creditor
will win. Unless, the sec. creditor made the loan either after 45 days of
the Tax Lien OR has knowledge of the Tax Lien. (Rare Concept)
Distinction is the word OR (Basically there to counter efforts to avoid
tax lien).
Problem Set 38 38.2
This is all relatively rare and he will not really cover any of the following on the final:
XVI.
19
b.
c.
d.
e.
ii.
XVIII.
1. After Default the S/c can repossess the collateral at any time or can make it
unusable. (Self-Help Repo.)
2. In so doing, the creditor cannot breach the peace [a std] (Only req.)
In LA.
1. Prohibits Self-Help Repo.
a. Exception: if the collateral is in accounts what you do is send a notice
and you say, I just notified you that I placed the debtor in default & you
now pay me, the creditor.
b. Cars are also an exception to this prohibition of self-help
2. Can take the possession only in 3 instances:
a. (1) Debtor Gives it to you
b. (2) Debtor can consent to Repossession (Only after default)
c. (3) Send out the sheriff Creditor gets a writ of seizure and sale. (Most
common)
3. Moveable and Immovable Property Legislature allows a summary judicial
process called an executory process where repossession by judicial action is
much more simple than regular COA. (Only WRT the collateral and not the
status of Debtor)
21
XIX.
XX.
iii. Creditor can bid at his own sale if it is public. If it is a private sale,
then the creditor can only bid if the collateral is perishable or subject
to widely disbursed price quotations.
iv. Creditor has to send notice to debtor and anyone else who might have
an interest in the property.
v. Any sale w/ a surplus surplus goes to the debtor.
vi. Article 9 states that if a debtor complains, then the creditor will have
to show that the sale was commercially reasonable.
3. Trade of collateral in exchange for the debt (Under Article 9, this is Strict
Foreclosure; in LA this is dation en paiment)
a. Art. 9 Creditor sends the debtor a proposal to do this and the debtor has
20 days to respond. Also, send notices to everyone else with an interest
in the property.
i. If nothing happens in the 20 day period, then you have strict
foreclosure.
b. If property is consumer goods, the creditor would have to repossess first.
c. If Debtor has paid 60% of the loan, then no strict foreclosure.
d. Immovables the debtor has to agree in writing to this S/f (in LA).
Outside LA called a deed in Lieu of foreclosure. Not v. common
b. Dont worry about this too much, just understand three step process of (1) Default, (2)
Repossession (3) foreclosure
Assignment 4: Judicial Sale and Deficiency Covered Above
a. Strict Foreclosure
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
b.
c.
d.
e.
OF ARTICLE 9
Conventional Mortgages
a. Creation
i. Introduction
22
ii.
23
b.
24
ii.
iii.
1. Biggest Difference in real estate filing and personal property filings is that the
debtors name is not as significant in the mortgage system.
2. Priority depends on the type of statute governing the filing:
a. Race (LA) first to file wins (Same as article 9);
b. Notice When unidentified party has notice that is enough; OR
c. Notice- Race Either day of notice or first to file to have priority.
3. Mtg. is effective as to 3Ps Upon Filing in parish where immovable is
located. (Art. 3308)
a. Filing must be in proper office and location
i. i.e.: Orleans Parish have 2 records offices: conveyance and mtg.
Must file in mtg. for mtg. to be effective as to 3Ps.
b. Must have Recorder endorse the time filed on the act
c. Old Law Must have actual filing by Atty and priority established when
recorded.
d. The mtg. may be totally misleading and the filer may even fail to file it,
and it does not matter. ONLY the fact of filing matters!!!
4. 3Ps neither party to mort. K, nor univ. succ., nor those bound by K to
recognize the mortgage (Art. 3309)
5. Witness to an act is not a party to the act. (Art. 3310)
6. Notarial Acts are effective against 3Ps upon deposit in the office of the
parish recorder or register of conveyances where the immovable is located.
7. Dont require a connection between the mtg. and obligation now.
8. Paraph no longer required paragraph on the note which sometimes
provided Ne Varietur meaning dont change this note. Purpose was to make
it clear that this note is what is secured by the mtg.
Duration of Inscription (Limited in time, like Article 9)
1. Generally, the effect of R of documents creating a mortgage or evidencing a
privilege ceases 10 years from the date on the act of mtg. (Art. 3328)
a. Time period commences from date on act of mtg. and not the date
promissory note is signed neither the date of filing.
b. Exception: Art. 3329 when the act of mtg.
i. Describes the obligation that is secured AND
ii. Describes the oblig. as mature 9 years or longer from act of mtg.
iii. Then, mtg. is effective 6 years after the maturation of the obligation.
(i.e.: maturation in 30 yrs 36 yrs. of effectiveness)
c. Old Law Used to measure from date of obligation
2. Reinscription (Similar to Article 9)
a. Reinscription extends effectiveness of original filing by 10 years, when
filed before the effects of original filing cease (10 years). Art. 3334
b. When filed after cessation of original filing, effects of recordation are
only from the date of this filing (including rank). Art. 3335
c. Accomplished by filing a signed, written notice of reinscription. It must
state the name of the mor, recordation date of document or of a prior
notice, and declares the document reinscribed. Art. 3333
Cancellation (Art. 3337)
1. Recorder shall cancel or erase a mortgage or privilege when:
25
c.
26
iii.
II.
3. When obligor may assert that obligation that the mtg. secures is
unenforceable or extinguished, then the mtgor may raise same def. Art. 3286
4. Methods of Extinction (Art. 3319) We focus on Three:
a. Extinction or destruction of the thing mortgaged. (Similar to UCC 9)
b. Prescription of all the obligations that mtg. secures. (Most Common)
i. Monetary obligation not secured by a mtg. are subject to 3 year
Liberative Px. Art. 3494
ii. Px begins to run once payment is demandable!
iii. Actions on instruments and promissory notes, whether negotiable or
non-negotiable instruments Px after 5 years from day of payment
becomes exigible. Art. 3499
iv. Must look to type of debt Either installment notes or lump note.
v. Liberative Px is interrupted when debtor acknowledges the right of
the creditor. Art. 3464.
1. Resets clock for another 5 years.
2. Acknowledgment may be anything, but you would want a
writing for evidentiary purposes.
vi. SCOTT v. CORKERN If a creditor is holding
anything in pledge for something else, it constitutes a
constant acknowledgement by the debtor of the
obligation. Even if the thing is worthless, it is enough
that the debtor allows the creditor to hold something
which indicates that debtor owes an obligation.
c. When all obligations, present and future, have been incurred and
extinguished (once primary obligation is gone, you cannot have a mtg.
on something that does not exist since its accessory to sec. int. same
w/ UCC 9)
i. Indication of above: The transferor warrants existence, validity and
enforceability of the mtg. only to the extent he warrants obligation
for the same. Art. 3312
Class 16 Problems
27
2. Prior to 1992 THE PROBLEM the bank could not have a mtg. for a
fluctuating line of credit, because once the total of all the loans equaled the
maximum amount/credit line stated, the bank could not longer loan money
under this note. Also, once the payments totaled the amount of the loan/line
of credit, the obligation was extinguished; you would have to get a
different/new mtg. and would have a much different date of priority on the
new mtg. As a result, you would lose priority of original extension of line of
credit. Simply A MATTER OF RANK this is the issue!!! Bank does not
want to have to go back for new loan, b/c (1) inconvenient, (2) interruption in
rank and the property is much less secure, the int. rate will be higher, and
hinder the flow of money. (DEBATE on this )
3. We found a way around this problem w/o use of mtg. law. LA lawyers used
pledge (a movable sec. law) in the 1800s to get around this. The problem
was that immov. property was not subject to pledge, it was subject to
Antichresis. This is where the notion of collateral mtg. was derived.
a. Collateral is the property that sec. an obligation. Collateral Also means
side, ancillary to something else. Its an ancillary right. Essentially a
mtg. that stood at the side of the transaction.
b. This is not a separate kind of mtg. This should be called a collateral mtg.
package.
i. Collateral Mtg. Includes a document which looks like a
conventional mtg. and subject to same rules, but it is used in
collateral mtg. in a particular way.
ii. Pledge rules are pretty much the same as article 9 rules, so Article 9
governs the collateral mtg. situation.
4. Collateral Mtg. Trans. Has following Docs:
a. Collateral Mtg. (Conventional Mtg. on property securing obligation to
repay hand notes)
b. Promissory Note
c. Hand Notes
d. A Collateral Mtg. Note
i. AKA Ne Varietur Note not required anymore.
ii. Debtor signs the note
iii. Note is generally payable on demand to the bearer of the note.
iv. Note usually includes a surplus payable on demand, but it is not what
it looks like. (i.e.: credit line of 5 mil. and note says you pay $7.5
mil. Upon demand to bearer of the note).
v. Pledge the note to the bank. (Sometimes this was memorialized in a
sec. agreement where the debtor declares a pledge of the
promissory note to the bearer to secure any and all indebtedness at
any time in the future. By Taking possession, the bank attaches it
sec. int. and value has been given in the loan)
1. The bank under this note would make loans known as hand
notes. These told you how much money the debtor has
borrowed. Perfection was accomplished here by taking and
28
iv.
v.
29
b.
c.
III.
Multiple Indebtedness Mortgages (AKA 3298 Mtg; or Mtg. to secure future adv.)
i. Banks priority WRT a mtg. ranks when its filed, and it can describe any future
indebtedness in whatever amount, provided it states a maximum amount. Art.
3298
1. Required language: Any and all indebtedness up to a maximum amount
ii. When recording, must entitle the document as multiple indebtedness mtg. or
multiple obligations mtg. on the first page.
iii. This should not be paraphed in any way, because it messes things up. Also, dont
have to do for collateral mtg.
iv. Disadvantage is only that people are not used to it. Judges in particular.
Class 17 Problems
30
c.
d.
2. Code of Civ. Pro Article 2031 provides the method for revival of money
judgment Subject to ten year period after revival and any interested party
may revive as many times as the like. Art. 3501
3. Failure to prevent Px, will result in loss of everything
x. Filing notice of reinscription is sufficient to continue the effects of the mtg. La.
R.S.
1. Failure to re-inscript results in loss of priority, but not sec. int. 9:5502
Both Legal and Judicial Mortgages
i. Burden all the property of the obligor that is made susceptible of mortgage by
Article 3286 or that is expressly made subject to jud. or legal mtg. by other law.
Art. 3302
ii. These are general mtg.s and estd. over property owned by the debtor when mtg.
is created and property acquired after the mtg. is established. Art. 3303
Ranking Mortgages
i. Generally, the First to File wins. The mtgee is superior in rank to both unsecured
creditors and as to others whose rights are effective after mtg. creation. Art.
3307(3)
ii. Mtg. has effect between parties from est. of mtg. and from the time of filing as to
3Ps. Art. 3298(B). Also, Multiple indebtedness mtg. ranks ahead of any future
mtgs. This is like Art. 9, but different, because this rule is not present in mtg. law.
(Knowledge & 45 days; Unless IRS beats sec. int. or mtg. either w/ Knowledge
OR 45 days)
iii. Collateral Mtg. Package Ranks from the moment at which both the Collateral
Mtg. is filed of recordation AND when the creditor has perfected its either pledge
(prior to 1990) OR sec int. (after 1990) in the mtg. note.
1. To avoid a problem, these should be done on the same day, but does not have
to be done on the same day.
2. Before 1990 the pledge articles governed the transaction and said a pledge
is complete by same test as possession under article 9 essentially, the debtor
has to have rights in the collateral, the debtor must give over the note to the
creditor with agreement (which had to be written sometimes or not) could
be oral;
a. THE DIFFERENCE is that nothing else was required other than GF
prior to 1990.
b. Toups & Campbell says that pledge from the moment of turning over
the note and agreement to the obligation is enough, even if no advances
had been made! This was enough to show that CMN had been perfected
and once recorded, you were fine
3. After 1990 when we adopted article 9 they said pledge does n/a anymore.
a. They have a clear 3 step test:
i. Debtor has rights in collateral
ii. Creditor has possession of the note.
iii. Value has been given - this was not required; possession WAS
enough for attachment and perfection requirements.
31
e.
IV.
4. So, you could not rank until value has been given after 1990 Only after the
advance has been made does attachment begin, in typical circumstances. You
must have filing and sec. int. must be perfected to determine the ranking.
a. Exception is when you have a binding commitment to make a future loan
to have value given now.
5. NOTE: This is a collateral mtg., because that is what it looks like and when it
looks like one, this is what it is.
iv. PEOPLES BANK AND TRUST CO. v. CAMPBELL Collateral Mtg. v.
Material mans lien Delivery to the bank of the mortgage and note by the
debtors constituted a pledge of the mtg. and note to the bank to secure future
indebtedness, and as such, should be given ranking so as to affect 3Ps from the
subsequent recordation.
v. La. R.S. 9:5550-5551(A), (B)
Problems 29.1 and 38.1; Class 18 Problems;
Privileges
a. Introduction Pay more attention to specific priv. and less to this section of gen. Priv.
i. This is a non-consensual security instrument.
ii. Privileges may exist on movables or immovables. Art. 3189
1. Privileges are either special or general when on movable. Art. 3190
iii. Privilege allows debtors to enforce their rights quickly thru executory process.
iv. These are only a reservation of rights in property of some kind. They must sue
and get a judgment to have enforceability. This will prime other people and
sometimes even mtg. holders or creditors.
1. Privilege can be maintained during lawsuit. Prior to judgment, the creditor
may ask for a writ of sequestration during adjudication of rights. After
judgment, you can have property sold and recover from sale.
2. The issue then becomes how powerful is your privilege WRT amount
recoverable and the priority over other possible creditors?
v. Limitations: Privilege disappears if property is destroyed. Also, limited in
duration: why you want to sequester property. Also, often limited on the space
from which you can claim the privilege. Make sure structured correctly to keep
rank.
vi. Step 1: The purpose of privi. Is to encourage socially constructive behavior. This
encourages placing $ in the stream of commerce, perform services and offer
goods into SOC and we want them to offer the goods to a variety of people.
1. When they dont get paid, you give these people a privilege, because you
want to encourage them to continue in their societal valuable role.
2. Liens (Non LA) Non-consensual sec. dev. On immov. Or mov.
vii. Remember that these privileges are OLD and they will make little sense and few
are applicable today! So, concentrate on currently relevant ones. May want to
consider new possible privileges which could be included.
viii. These must be construed strictly/narrowly, because it says who gets what exactly.
ix. 2 kinds of privileges:
1. So critical to society that you give int. in all of debtors property these are
GENERAL and they very rarely apply
32
b.
33
c.
34
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
viii.
ix.
x.
35
d.
e.
36
f.
g.
37
h. Class 20 Problems
i. Lessors Privilege
i. Landlords obtain a privilege for the rents of immovables, which extends to all
movables brought on the premises by lessee and all crops or movables by
anticipation. Art. 3217(3)
ii. These secure the payment of rent only, and do not apply to damages. Art. 3218
iii. The Lessors privilege is enforced under Title of Lease. Art. 3219
1. Exemptions include: clothing, bed, utensils, and tools of the trade (basically
what is needed to sustain livelihood) are not subject to this priv. Art.2705
2. The privilege attaches to all tangible property on the premises. Some cts.
have allowed the seizure of incorporeals, such as promissory notes. Art. 2705
iv. The sub-lessee may have his property seized to the extent of the debt due to the
sub-lessor (primary lessee). Art. 2706
v. Art. 2707 & 2708 Code used to state, Property of a 3P can be subject to this
privilege. However, the code NOW provides that this privilege does not extend
to the property of 3Ps.
1. NOW, The Code ALSO says that if the 3P is not diligent in removal &
2. fails to assert his rights in the property at some point prior to sale of the
property, the sale is permissible.
3. ALSO, lessor must not have knowledge that this property belongs to 3P.
vi. The Lessor may seize the objects subject to this privilege before lessee removes
them from this premises, OR if removed w/o lessors consent, the lessor has a
right of pursuit for 15 days after property removal. Art. 2709(A)
1. However, the property must still be identifiable as belonging to the lessee.
vii. The privilege is enforced by a writ of sequestration, b/c self-help is not permitted.
Art. 2709(B)
viii. Lessor's privilege can be destroyed in bankruptcy yet another reason to take
UCC 9 Sec. Int.
ix. Rank these are superior to vendors privilege, unless it is a vendor of farm
instruments. Additionally, if all is filed, this trumps perfected sec. int. under Title
9 and it trumps privilege of furnisher of supplies, money, water, or physician. La.
R.S. 9:4521
x. The lessors privilege against crops must be recorded! (Guaranty Trust)
xi. Privilege of Self-Service Storage Facilities is under La. R.S. 9:4756-4760.
1. This is similar to lessors privilege in that it extends to all movable property
on the storage premises.
a. However, this is different, b/c the storage facility owner may recover all
rent due and all reasonable expenses for both the preservation of the
thing and expenses arising from enforcement of this privilege.
2. The privilege attachs on the date the movable property is brought to the selfservice storage facility.
3. This is superior over any other privilege or sec. int., except
a. Inferior to vendors privilege, OR
b. A chattel mtg. previously issued and recorded, OR
c. Sec. int. under UCC 9. La. R.S. 9:4758
38
j.
k.
l.
4. Upon default, if the agreement provides for acceleration, the owner may
exercise that right OR he may cancel the lease and enforce his privilege for
the debt due to him by (1) changing locks, (2) giving notice to lessee, (3)
delivery of notice in person or by certified mail and (4) conforming w/ notice
requirements. (5) ten days after either mailing or receipt of letter,
advertisement about sale; (6) must wait 10 more days to commence sale; (7)
sale must meet std. of notification; (8) sale held at storage facility or other
appropriate venue, and sell to highest bidder or if no bidders, to owner to
satisfy privilege; (9) Prior to sale, lessee may pay amt. due and redeem
movable property; (10) Purch. In GF takes free and clear; (11) any excess
must be held by owner in non-interest bearing acct. for two years. La. R.S.
9:4759.
Vendors Privilege (LA Favors Sellers)
i. These protect unpaid creditors/vendors who sell property on credit.
ii. If the buyer fails to pay the price, the seller may sue for dissolution of the sale.
Art. 2561
iii. For movable property, the vendee/purchaser must have physical possession of the
property for the privilege to attach. Art. 3227
iv. The privilege is lost by sale and transferring possession of the thing to a 3P.
However, sale of the thing alone is not enough to lose privilege. Art. 3228
v. Vendor can claim restitution when the sale was not made on credit, if
1. They are in the possession of purchaser
2. At the latest, the claim is made 8 days after the delivery, and Art. 3229
3. Objects can be identified. (Not mixed in with other things of same kind, but
not sold by vendor) Art. 3230
a. Exception when things are easily recognizable, this identifiable
element is relaxed. Art. 3231
vi. Vendors privilege exists on immovable sold by vendor for the payment of the
price or so much of it as unpaid, whether it was sold on or w/o credit. Art. 3249
vii. A vendors privilege is preserved by recording act of sale in the office of mtgs.
The privilege is effective as to 3Ps upon recordation of such act OR evidence of
indebtedness as provided by law. Arts 3271, 3273
viii. La. R.S. 9:4541-44 Seller of Agricultural products in chartered towns and cities;
Seller of Cotton Seed on manufactured products; Seller of sugar case on Mfr
products; Vegetables, Seafood and other perishable items (no privilege).
ix. La R.S. 9:4561-64 Sewing machines and pianos subject to seizure; Entry and
removal of property (unlawful); Penalty for violation
x. La R.S. 9:4581-82 Holder of vendors priv. on property destroyed by fire,
privilege on insurance; Notice to insurer and to assured, deposit in court.
Class 21 Problems
Ranking of Privileges
i. The important rules are the ones in the chart. Other rules are too complex, and
not that practical, so he will only test us on the charts rules.
ii. Note timing for privileges is not that important; instead, they are normally
ranked by the CC and R.S. Timing will come back in when dealing w/ crops and
perfection in Crops. Also, note for Art. 9 sec. int. timing usually deciding factor.
39
iii.
iv.
Notes on Chart:
1. Non-farming movables has 3 main rules
a. Gen., Art. 9 sec. int. perfected or not beats almost every other priv. and
sec. dev. Couple of exceptions:
i. Possessory privilege will beat this, unless R.S. provides o/wise.
ii. Repairpersons Lien CC exists & extends to labor only, and not
materials. Also, repairperson MUST have possession. (Mech. In
particular) Note: Materials & labor covered in R.S., but low rank.
iii. The lawyers privilege. (BEATS ALL!!!)
b. Lessors priv. beats the vendors privilege.
c. Usually, gen. privileges rank last.
2. Sec. Int. in Farm Products Mainly crops, not really cattle, sheep, etc.
a. Ag. Liens and sec. int. in crops are all perfected
i. R.S. govern in this case. 9:4521 order of priority in chart
ii. Lien creditor ranks according to art. 9 Always, rule is whichever is
perfected first in seizing of crop or perfection of sec. int.
iii. Mtg. extends to crops as well, b/c it extends to immovables
attached until the crop is harvested anyways.
1. Note: that Art. 9 this is not that important, b/c this Art. 9 int.
would beat effective mtg. in crops.
b. Ag. Liens not perfected, but sec. int. in crops.
i. Only art. 9 governs in this instance.
3. Ranking scheme for immov. property 3 main rules:
a. (1) Prior rec. mtg. beats everyone if R w/in 7 or 15 days of act of credit
sale beats everyone. Essentially PM mtg. rule.
b. (2) Gen. priv. affect immovables only if movables are insufficient to
cover the obligation. But these might outrank prior R mtgs. if even the
immov. property is not suff. to cover the obligation.
c. (3) Mtgs. are generally going to rank last as against other privileges.
RANKING OF PRIVILEGES, SECURITY INTERESTS & MORTGAGES
OTHER THAN IN FARM PRODUCTS (CROPS)
MOVABLES
Possessory privileges for services/materials provided with
respect to movables beat UCC9 security interest, unless statute
specifically provides otherwise [9-333], e.g.,
privilege for preservation expenses [3224, 3226, 3262],
carriers privilege for transport expenses [3217(9), 3265],
artisans privilege for labor costs [3217(2)],
statutes provide otherwise with respect to prior
perfected security interests, which beat repairpeople
[9:4501(B), 9:4502(B)], haulers (carriers) [9:4601(B)],
and self-storage lessors [9:4758] [R.S. trumps Civil
Code ranking]
IMMOVABLES
Vendors privilege [act of credit sale must be recorded in
mortgage records per 3271, 3273] beats prior mortgage IFF
recorded within 7/15 days of date of act of credit sale [3274]
Prior vendor beats later vendor [3251]
retroactive priority likely does NOT extend to prior
perfected security interests in component parts
[9-322(h), 9-334]potential for another vicious circle
vicious circle if prior mortgage beats vendor who
records after 7/15 beyond credit sale [3274], vendor
beats general privilege [3269], but general privilege
beats mortgage [3186]
not entirely clear that vendor of immovable property
beats all general privileges [cf. 3267 and 3269 ???]
40
41
42
b.
43
Rank
a. How do they rank against each other and potential mtg. claimant for
const. mtg.?
i. Rank in two different ways against each other or against mtgs. OR
against Art. 9 Sec. Int. (BAR ? in July) La. R.S. 9:4821
1. Political Subdivision have tax claims, etc. (dont worry about,
b/c rare and for small amounts.) Otherwise:
2. Properly R and enforced claim of laborers beat everyone! Even
Prior R mtgs. and prior R Fixture interests. Also, these rank
equally w/ each other.
3. Mtgs. and Art. 9 sec. int. in fixtures and vendors priv. that have
been properly R before other PWA arise in time win. So, first in
time wins.
4. Other PWA privilege holders Sellers, lessor, sub-Kors,
suppliers of materials, and lessor. They rank amongst
themselves by nature; who is claiming priv.? WRT mtg., first in
time who either R the mtg. or when the privilege arose wins.
a. Other PWA privs. arise either (a) when notice of K is
timely filed OR (b) if notice not filed, when work began
on the project. The same for every privilege holder.
44
i.
Suretyship
a. Basics
i. Introduction
1. Totally different kind of sec. dev., b/c these dont extend to property.
2. You have a real personal right in suretyship. You can go after a person for the
unfulfilled obligation. Art. 3035
3. Diff. btwn Surety and Co-obligor? Not a lot WRT the obligation; major diff.
is the rights and def. given to the surety, which is not given to the co-obligor.
4. Even this type of obligation can be secured by an accessory real right. We
focus on the personal right. Art. 3036.
5. Common scenario is when the debtor is a business org. like an LLC or LLP.
a. This gives them the right to bring in others to make them liable on the
debt as well too.
b. Ex. of Daughter finances car and mom on the hook to pay for the car.
c. This acts as extra security to make sure that the obligation is fulfilled.
6. Suretyship is normally a promise to pay money, but it does not have to be.
Assume for this course that this is what happens obligation to pay $.
7. Illustration:
$
Bank (C)
Debtor
45
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Surety
C v. S
1. This must be established formally 2 requirements:
a. Express (unambiguous) &
b. In Writing (basically act under private signature at a min.)
2. The agreement must say: if the debtor does not pay, I will pay. This must
be unambiguous, Art. 1847 you cannot show this by parole evidence.
3. Sometimes, this arises when it looks like a surety is a co-obligor not as a
surety, and thus not having the extra rights available to the surety. Art. 3037
shows when it looks like you have a co-obligor, you will treat them as a
surety IFF:
a. Principle cause of agreement is a guarantee (like no use of car), &
b. If the creditor clearly knows that. (Troublesome, but should be able to
determine this but sticky facts!)
Multiple Suretys
1. By expressly agreeing, most surety agreements say that the only suspensive
cond. is that I dont have to pay until the debtor defaults/ didnt pay.
a. Suretys dont have the defense of division (surety cannot cl. division this,
they are all bound for the entire obligation, 100%, unless the agreement
says otherwise.) & no discussion (exhaustion of remedies against the
debtor).
2. Default rule means that these are Guarantees of Payment. Exception:
Guarantee of Collection requires the creditor to exhaust his remedies ag. the
debtor.
S v. D
1. What rights does the Surety have against the Debtor? Art. 3047 As a matter
of law they have 2 rights against the debtor:
a. Demand reimbursement against the debtor (as long as obligation was
exigible); &
b. Subrogation (Art. 3048 says since the surety has paid the obligation,
the surety has essentially bought the creditors position against the debtor
what good does this do? This extends to all of the creditors rights,
including any real rights creditor had against debtor!) Also, Art. 1826(a)
2. Gen. Surety is entitled to attys fees for having to come after them, only when
the agreement so provides!
S. v. S
1. Rights between sureties when one of these pays more than they are to bear,
they can just like co-obligors seek contribution from each other. Art. 3055.
2. They all agree to bear equal amts. as a matter of law but this can be
changed by agreement.
3. They can go after each other for their virile shares. (But only that share!)
a. If one other Surety becomes insolvent, virile share is now the value owed
divided by the number of solvent sureties remaining.
4. Dont worry about 3057 not on bar or test!
46
b.
5. When seeking contribution from each other, they will not get attys fees. But
they may get costs from gen. rule that loser pays costs.
vi. Class 25 Problems
Defenses and Termination
i. Kinds of Suretyship 3 Types of Suretyship:
1. Commercial One in which:
a. Surety in Surety Business;
b. Principal obligor or surety is a business entity;
c. Principal oblig. arises out of a commcl transaction of Princ. obligor; OR
d. Suretyship arises out of commercial transaction of surety.
2. Legal Bail Bonds Not covered by class.
3. Ordinary Neither Commcl. nor Ord.; must be strictly construed in favor of
the surety! (Ex: dad guarantying sons car pmt) Art. 3044
a. Generally these are unremunerated! (No payment)
ii. S Defenses v. C.
1. S may assert any def. to the princ. oblig. the princ. obligor could assert
against the creditor, except:
a. Lack of capacity or
b. Discharge in B/r of princ. obligor. Art. 3046
2. Surety obligations are extinguished (E) the same way conventional
obligations are extinguished, subj. to some differences: Art. 3058
a. Suretyship is E by Extinguishment of principal obligation.
b. Rx of princ. obligation E suretys obligation.
i. Suretys action for contribution against princ. obligor and other
sureties Rxs in 10 years. Art. 3060
ii. Interruption of Rx to interrupt as to all sureties and princ. obligors,
the agreement must provide all parties are bound together w/ surety.
c. Material Modification of princ. oblig. by C w/o consent of Surety has the
following effects:
i. Ordinary S is E.
ii. Commercial S is E only to the extent S is prejudiced by actions of C,
unless (1) obligation is for other than the payment of $; & (2) S
should have contemplated C might take such action in ordinary
course of obligation.
1. C has BOP to show S not prejudiced OR prej. < amt. of Ss full
obligation. Art. 3062
d. Impairment of Collateral: if the C does something to impair his rights
WRT real security, (e.g.: like for failing to re-inscribe a mtg.) / impair the
value of the collateral, then you have a suretyship Def.
i. This extinguishes Ordinary S. Art. 3062
ii. Commercial surety has the same rule as material modification.
3. Remission (Release) of debt: (Dont do this if you are the creditor!!)
a. To princ. obligor releases S, but remission of debt to S does not release
principal obligor/s. (Note this might be waived in the K).
b. Remission of debt granted to one surety releases the other sureties to the
extent of contribution they could have sought from remitted S (his virile
47
iii.
share). (Before 1988 old law is release of surety releases all other
sureties, this is not the law anymore. B. above is the law!!!)
c. Obligee grants a remission for advantage, adv. is imputed to debt, unless
o/w agreed. Art. 1892.
4. All of these defenses can be waived and very often are waived Art. 3040.
Total waiver of defenses and agreement to be bound may not be valid
agreement (unresolved point of law).
Termination (Art. 3061)
1. Suretyship may be terminated by notice to the creditor by surety.
a. After notice, the surety may still be liable for obligations incurred by the
principal D, OR obligations C is bound to permit the D incur.
b. Nor may notice prejudice C or D who has changed his position in
reliance of S.
2. Knowledge of death of surety has same effect as notice above.
a. Univ. successors can continue the bond informally by confirmation.
48