NOTE:

See
SOURCES:
NOTE:
NOTES:
See
SOURCE:
SOURCES:
Although
appendix
appendix
Survey
Responses
Attentive
4%
Pew
Gaskell,
Gaskell,
table
tables
(N
table
respondents
Research
= 245)
7-10.
7-18.
7-20.
were
7-23.
are
public
7-25.
7-3
7-42,
7-2
7-31.
G.,
G.,to
of
and
and
to
and
the
7-43,
Center
are
all
the
were
7-5.
7-6.
Bauer,
Bauer,
following
people
question,
and
classified
forM.W.
7M.W.
the
who
People
As
(editors)
(editors)
(1)I express
mention
and
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
the
high
some
Press,
level
activities,
of19962000,
19962000, National
National Museum
Museum of
of Science
Science and
and Industry (U.K.)
Poziom
zadowolenia
klientw
wg
grup
wiekowych
as
44.
Industry
characters
characteristics,
interest
statement:
tell
Internet
and
19962000
having
me
Michigan
who
in
(U.K.)
Sapping
a,acommitted
Next
high
National
you
particular
State
and
who
mostly
Ilevel
Broadcast
would
Michigan
University
first
Museum
crime
issue;
of
associate
comes
likeduring
(2)
News
State
ofPress.
to
feel
Science
with
mindscientists,
University
Audience:
well
The
that
informed
and
1999
activitya
Industry
Press.
Investors
and
about
technicians,
2000
The
scientist,
(U.K.)
Now
that
1999
surveys
Go
and
issue,
and
a were
2000conducted
surveys
were
by George
conducted
Gaskell,
by George
MartinGaskell,
Bauer, and Nick
a

Science
Science
&
&Engineering
Engineering
Indicators
2002
Science
Engineering
Indicators
Indicators
2002
science/mathematics
Martin
sample
or
and
to
technician,
Online
Alum
Michigan
engineers?
read
(3)
for
Bauer,
for
you
read
period,
the
State
Quotes,
or
aaEuropean
list
and
an
newspaper
only
University
of
engineer?
Nick
Advice.
industries.
2%
education
Alum
were
Commission;
Press.
on
Biennial
for
aFor
ifdaily
the
they
The
each
Media
European
basis,
Susanna
1999
took Consumption
read
andCommission;
Priest,
2000
a weekly
surveys
Texas
Survey,
or klienta
monthly
A&M
Susanna
June
University;
Priest, Texas
and Edna
A&MEinsiedel,
University;University
and Ednaof Calgary. The
Procentowa
ilo
bardzo
zadowolonych
wg
wieku
Science
& Engineering
Indicators
read
2002
nine
Einsiedel,
identified
news
one
11,
1997
were
2000.
or
I mention,
conducted
U.S.
magazine,
more
with
http://www.people-press.org/media00rpt.htm.
University
survey
high
criminal
please
by
or
school
was
frequently
George
oftell
conducted
Calgary.
asme
their
Gaskell,
main
The
bya 1997
Martin
Jon
magazine
D.U.S.
Bauer,
Miller,
survey
highly
Chicago
andrelevant
was
Nickconducted
Academy
Alum
to the ofbySciences.
Jon D. Miller, Chicago Academy of Sciences.

and
occupation.
SOURCE:
issue.
how
for the
college
favorable
Interested
European
Louis
math/science
you
Harris
Commission;
public
are toward
& are
courses.
Associates,
people
that
Susanna
They
who
Inc.express
Priest,
American
Texas
high
Perspectives
level
A&M of interest
on
<
30
30-49
50+
Science
Science
&
&using
Engineering
Engineering
Indicators
Indicators

2002
2002
were
Engineers
in
industry
University;
aMiesic
particular
classified
&and
Engineering.
issue
aas
Edna
1middle
tobut
10
Einsiedel,
do
scale
ifA
not
Harris
where
feel
University
well
Pollinformed
Pilot
of Calgary.
Study
about
conducted
it. The
attentive
for the
they
NOTE:
the
public
1 means
American
American
took
for
Occupations
six
you
science
Association
toAssociation
are
eight
not
and
such
of
atof
technology
3,577
all
Engineering
of
courses,
favorable
Engineering
aand
Societies.
combination
Societies.
Julyof
July
1998.
the1998.
attentive75%
Sty
42%isand
46%
Science
& new
Engineering
Indicators

2002
low
characters
public
10
means
if Lut
for
they
extremely
whose
took
scientific
five
occupations
or
fewer.
discoveries
are
and the attentive
39%
51% public for new
76%
Science
&
Engineering
Engineering
Indicators

2002
2002
identified,
inventions
favorable. from
You
and may
technologies.
total use
sample
any of
number
Anyone
6,882 who is not attentive to either of
Mar
29%
38%public for at least
73%
See
speaking
these
between
appendix
issues,
1characters
andtables
but
10.
who
7-11.
appearing
is a member
in of the interested
weekly
one ofKwi
these
samples
issues,
of prime
is classified
time33%
as a member of
the interested public
39%
75%
Science
& Engineering
Indicators
from
2002respondents
dramatic
for
SOURCE:
science
and
Figure
technology.
reproduced
programs
Survey
the
were classified as
Majentertainment
48%
53%
70%
(199497).
having
American
a high
Chemical
levelSociety,
of science/mathematics education if they took
Cze
57%courses. They78%
nine
National
or
more
Benchmark
high school
Telephone
and 51%
college
survey,
math/science
were
SOURCE:
classified
conductedas
G.
bymiddle
Gerbner
Wirthlin ifand
theyB.took
Linson,
six to eight such courses, and low
Images
ifWorldwide,
they took
of Scientists
five
draftorreport,
fewer.
in Prime
July 2000,
Time
Television:
WashingtonAD.C.
Report for the U.S.
Department
See appendix
of table
Commerce
7-8. From the
Science &Indicators
Engineering
Indicators
2002
Cultural
Research
Project
Science & Engineering
Indcators 2002
(Washington,
DC:
U.S. Department of Commerce,
1998). Unpublished report.
Science & Engineering Indicators 2002