Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
available at www.sciencedirect.com
article info
abstract
Article history:
Objective: This study evaluated the bond strengths of four different margin ceramics based
Methods: Zirconia cores (Zirconzahn) (N = 28, n = 7/margin ceramic group) were fabricated
30 May 2008
according to the manufacturers instructions (diameter: 4 mm; thickness: 2 mm) and ultra-
sonically cleaned. Four different margin ceramics (thickness: 5 mm) (Cerabien Zr, Noritake;
Ceramco PFZ, Ceramco; e.max, Ivoclar Vivadent and Triceram, Dentaurum) were vibrated
and condensed in a stainless steel mould and fired onto their zirconia cores. After trying the
Keywords:
specimens in the mould for minor adjustments, they were again ultrasonically cleaned and
embedded in PMMA. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 8C for 1 week and
Zirconia
shear bond strength (MPa S.D.) tests were performed in a universal testing machine
Margin ceramic
(crosshead speed: 0.5 mm/min). Failure modes were recorded under SEM.
Copy-milling
Results: Significant effect of margin ceramic types were found on the bond strength values
(P < 0.05). The mean bond strength values of Ceramco margin ceramic to zirconia was
significantly lower (25.4 4.5 MPa) (P < 0.05) than those of Cerabien (31.6 6.4 MPa), e.max
(35.9 8.4 MPa), and Triceram margin ceramic (38.8 7.1 MPa) systems.
Conclusions: Margin ceramics, compatible with zirconia framework material tested in the
present study, exhibited high bond strength values. Variations in thermal expansion
coefficients might influence their bond strength values.
# 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1.
Introduction
* Corresponding author at: Ege University, School of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Bornova 35100, Izmir, Turkey.
Tel.: +90 2323880327; fax: +90 2323880325.
E-mail address: erhancomlek@yahoo.com (M.E. Comlekoglu).
0300-5712/$ see front matter # 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.019
823
2.
Ceramic type
Chemical composition
Manufacturer
Batch number
MB3 OD612
Cerabien Zr
Feldspathic
Feldspathic
Ceramco, Burlington,
NJ, USA
Fluorapatite
IvoclarVivadent,
Schaan, Liechtenstein
Feldspathic
Dentaurum, Ispringen,
Germany
APEJQ
A3-06002487
06003649
JO6301
H33669
H32689
H12845
SMA 003F
824
2.1.
2.2.
2.3.
2.4.
Failure analysis
2.5.
Statistical analysis
3.
Results
4.
Discussion
Cerabien
Ceramco
E.max
Triceram
Adhesive
(A)
Cohesive
margin
ceramic
(CMC)
Cohesive
substrate
ceramic
(CSC)
2
5
1
1
4
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
Mixed
(M)
1
2
2
2
825
Fig. 2 SEM images (150T) of the typical failure types for each margin ceramic tested: (a) cohesive failure within the margin
ceramic Cerabien; (b) cohesive failure within the margin ceramic Ceramco; (c) mixed failure type in e.max. The arrow
indicates the cohesive failure in the margin ceramic; (d) cohesive failure within the margin ceramic Triceram.
826
5.
Conclusions
Margin ceramics, compatible with zirconia framework material tested in the present study, exhibited high bond strength
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Stephan Fiorillo, master
technician from IvoclarVivadent for supplying the zirconia
frameworks and ZirkonZahn Asya Dental Laboratory, Istanbul, Turkiye for the processing of the zirconia specimens.
references
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
827