Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Original Article
Department of Anesthesiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Ban-Chiao, Taipei County, Taiwan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Chung-Li, Taiwan
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 13 June 2015
Received in revised form
7 October 2015
Accepted 19 October 2015
Keywords:
age;
hypotension;
propofol;
ERCP;
deep sedation
1. Introduction
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a
procedure used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes such as
sphincterotomy.1 Because it is a relatively uncomfortable and prolonged procedure, adequate sedation is usually benecial for its
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aat.2015.10.002
1875-4597/Copyright 2015, Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.
132
283/269
60 16
24.5 3.9
8.7
68.8
22.3
0.2
53.8 23.1
200
136
9
15
21
37
41/14
4
21
10
4
210
78
29
7
Table 2
Complications during anesthesia.
Complication
Hypotension
Hypertension
Desaturation
165 (29.9)
13 (2.35)
1 (0.18)
133
Table 3
Factors related to hypotension during anesthesia.
Parameter
Hypotension (n 165)
No hypotension (n 387)
74
91
67.7 12.7
24.3 3.8
57.4 23.4
209
178
57.1 16.8
24.6 3.9
52.3 22.9
8 (4.8)
110 (66.7)
47 (28.5)
0
40 (10.3)
270 (69.8)
76 (19.6)
1 (0.25)
77 (46.7)
1 (0.6)
123 (31.8)
14 (3.61)
p
0.049a
Sex
Male
Female
Age (y)
BMI (kg/m2)
Anesthetic time (min)
ASA
1
2
3
4
Comorbidity
Hypertension
Arrhythmia
<0.001b
0.516b
0.019b
0.034a
0.001c
0.048c
Table 4
Logistic regression for factors associated hypotension during anesthesia.
Univariable
Hypertension
Sex
Age
Anesthetic time
Multivariable
Multivariable
OR
95% CI
OR
95% CI
OR
95% CI
1.878
0.693
1.046
1.009
(1.293e2.728)
(0.48e0.999)
(1.032e1.060)
(1.001e1.017)
0.001
0.049
< 0.001
0.021
1.134
0.598
1.045
1.006
(0.752e1.712)
(0.405e0.883)
(1.030e1.059)
(0.998e1.014)
0.548
0.01
< 0.001
0.149
1.808
0.674
NA
1.009
(1.240e2.637)
(0.464e0.979)
NA
(1.001e1.017)
0.002
0.038
NA
0.03
Age
p*
Hypertension
Sex
ASA
Anesthetic time
0.372
0.076
NA
0.157
0.01
0.75
NA
0.01
abnormal ventilator activity can be delayed, especially if supplemental oxygen is provided.18 Capnography is a simple and inexpensive device, but it was not used in our study. Capnography
provides a continuous graphic record of respiratory movement and
is more reliable than pulse oximetry in the early detection of respiratory depression during colonoscopy with sedation.18 FriedrichRust et al19 found that capnography monitoring can reduce the
incidence of hypoxemia during propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy. Therefore, capnography can be considered another
advance monitor during ERCP.
Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol is an alternative
sedation during ERCP. Several studies have reported that TCI provides safe and effective sedation during ERCP.20,21 Chiang et al22
found that TCI of propofol combined with opioids was associated
with better hemodynamic and respiratory stability than manually
controlled infusion of propofol. In the setting of propofol administered by TCI combined with bispectral index, it is possible to
maintain stable sedation during endoscopic procedure, but some
complications were still found during sedation.23
In our study, propofol-based deep sedation was provided during
the procedure. Hypotension and respiratory depression are the
most common adverse effects observed during propofol continuous infusion.3,4 The major complication observed with the use of
intravenous propofol is transient oxygen desaturation during induction, and the mid-procedural period.13 Furthermore, concomitant use of propofol with narcotics amplies the respiratory
depressant effects.24 However, Lee et al9 found that there was no
static signicant in the cardiopulmonary complication rates in the
group given propofol combined with midazolam and fentanyl
compared with propofol monosedation, and patients who received
fentanyl had less minor pain.25 Alfentanil and propofol were prescribed during this study, which was safe with careful monitoring.
134
4.1. Limitations
Some inaccurate and incomplete records were encountered.
In conclusion, hypotension was the most frequent anesthetic
complication during the procedure under propofol-based deep
sedation, but this method was safe and effective with appropriate
monitoring. Age is the strongest predictor of hypotension and
therefore propofol-based deep sedation should be conducted with
caution in the elderly.
References
1. Kapoor H. Anaesthesia for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011;55:918e26.
2. Etzkorn KP, Diab F, Brown RD, Dodda G, Edelstein B, Bedford R, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under general anesthesia: indications and results. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:363e7.
3. Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R, Punyathavorn S, Sitthi-Amorn C, Ponauthai Y,
Prempracha N, et al. Propofol infusion versus intermittent meperidine and
midazolam injection for conscious sedation in ERCP. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis
2008;17:291e7.
4. Seifert H, Schmitt TH, Gltekin T, Caspary WF, Wehrmann T. Sedation with
propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic
procedures: a prospective, randomized study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000;14:
1207e14.
5. Vargo JJ, Zuccaro Jr G, Dumot JA, Shermock KM, Morrow JB, Conwell DL, et al.
Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam
for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2002;123:8e16.
6. Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in
high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol
2005;100:1957e63.
7. Garewal D, Waikar P. Propofol sedation for ERCP procedures: a dilemna? Observations from an anesthesia perspective. Diagn Ther Endosc 2012;2012:
639190.
8. Amornyotin S, Na-pomphet S, Wongwathanyoo T, Chalayonnavin V. Anesthesia
for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) from 1999e2003
in Siriraj Hospital: a retrospective study. J Med Assoc Thai 2004;87:1491e5.
9. Lee TH, Lee CK, Park SH, Lee SH, Chung IK, Choi HJ, et al. Balanced propofol
sedation versus propofol monosedation in therapeutic pancreaticobiliary
endoscopic procedures. Dig Dis Sci 2012;57:2113e21.
10. Baksi AJ, Treibel TA, Davies JE, Hadjiloizou N, Foale RA, Parker KH, et al. A metaanalysis of the mechanism of blood pressure change with aging. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2009;54:2087e92.
m O, Fa
rkkil
21. Mazanikov M, Udd M, Kyla
a L, Mustonen H, Lindstro
a M, et al.
A randomized comparison of target-controlled propofol infusion and patientcontrolled sedation during ERCP. Endoscopy 2013;45:915e9.
22. Chiang MH, Wu SC, You CH, Wu KL, Chiu YC, Ma CW, et al. Target-controlled
infusion vs. manually controlled infusion of propofol with alfentanil for bidirectional endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2013;45:
907e14.
23. Imagawa A, Hata H, Nakatsu M, Matsumi A, Ueta E, Suto K, et al. A targetcontrolled infusion system with bispectral index monitoring of propofol
sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endosc Int Open 2015;3:
E2e6.
24. Graber RG. Propofol in the endoscopy suite: an anesthesiologist's perspective.
Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:803e6.
25. Fassoulaki A, Iatrelli I, Vezakis A, Polydorou A. Deep sedation for endoscopic
cholangiopancreatography with or without pre or intraprocedural opioids: a
double-blind randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015;32:602e8.