In Bed With the Enemy

by Paul David Collins , Sept. 28th, 2006

Huey Long once asserted that fascism would first appear in America as anti-fascism.
Whether you consider the man to have been a hero or a tyrant, Long hit the nail on the
head with this assertion. President George W. Bush recently characterized Arab
terrorists as fascists. During a press conference held at his Texas ranch, Bush stated
that the terrorists try to spread their jihadist message a message I call Islamic
radicalism, Islamic fascism (Greene, no pagination). The Presidents contention
concerning Arab terrorists is, for the most part, correct. There is little difference between
a radical Islamic fundamentalist and a goose-stepping Nazi. However, when one
examines the American political landscape more closely, the tremendous hypocrisy of
Bushs statement becomes apparent. While denouncing Islamofascism in the public
spotlight, criminal factions in the government are actually connected to the terrorists
behind the scenes. Islamofascism is not merely the refuge of fanatics; it is a well-oiled,
highly intricate, government-sponsored enterprise.
A key character connecting the government to the terrorist network is Grover Norquist.
Norquist is a GOP/Bush operative who helped the President gain the support of Islamic
people and organizations here in the United States. The Nation magazine referred to
Norquist as Field Marshal of the Bush Plan (Gitell, no pagination). However, Norquist
can be characterized as much more than just a Bush supporter. Grover Norquist is best
described as the tie between the Administration and Islamists. Seth Gitell elaborates:
The Protestant Norquist is a founding director of the Islamic Institute, a socially
conservative Muslim think tank that eschews international issues in favor of domestic
issues such as tax cuts and faith-based initiatives. In addition, Norquists lobbying firm,
Janus-Merritt Strategies LLC, was officially registered as a lobbyist for the Islamic
Institute as well as for Abdurahman Alamoudi, the founder and former executive
director of the American Muslim Council. Public records show that Alamoudi has done
more than $20,000 worth of business with Norquists firm, on issues relating to
Malaysia. (No pagination)
Norquists Islamic links can be called anything but moderate. Consider the
aforementioned Abdurahman Alamoudi. Alamoudi has been involved in activities that
could be characterized as extremist. Seth Gitell informs us that Alamoudi:
attended an anti-Israel protest outside the White House on October 28, 2000. Alamoudi
revved up the crowd, saying: I have been labeled by the media in New York as being a
supporter of Hamas. Anybody supporters of Hamas here? The crowd cheered. Hear
that, Bill Clinton? We are all supporters of Hamas I wish they added that I am also a
supporter of Hezbollah. (Both groups are on the State Departments official list of
terrorist organizations.) (No pagination)
Another individual tied to the Alamoudis American Muslim Council is Sami Al-Arian, a
Kuwaiti born Palestinian associate professor at the University of South Florida.

In House of Bush, House of Saud, Craig Unger describes Al-Arians 1998 guest
appearance at the American Muslim Council:
In 1998, he appeared as a guest speaker before the American Muslim Council.
According to conservative author Kenneth Timmerman, Al-Arian referred to Jews as
monkeys and pigs and added, Jihad is our path. Victory to Islam. Death to Israel.
Revolution! Revolution! Until victory! Rolling, rolling to Jerusalem! That speech was
part of a dossier compiled on al-Arian by federal agents who have had him under
surveillance for many years because of suspected ties to terrorist organizations. (207)
On March 12, 2000, Al-Arian was among a group of Muslim leaders who had the
opportunity to meet with George and Laura Bush at a local mosque in Tampa Florida
(206). Doubtless, such a meeting would not have been possible without the influence of
Grover Norquist.
The ties between Norquist and Alamoudi are disturbing. However, Norquists links to
radical Islam go much deeper. There is evidence that seems to suggest that Norquist is
now a convert to Islam. Daniel Pipes provides evidence that this is the case:
Paul Sperry, author of the new book, Infiltration, in an interview calls Grover Norquist
an agent of influence for Islamists in Washington. When asked by FrontPageMag.com
why a Republican anti-tax lobbyist should so passionately promote Islamist causes,
Sperry implied that Norquist has converted to Islam: Hes marrying a Muslim, and
when I asked Norquist if he himself has converted to Islam, he brushed the question off
as too personal. As Lawrence Auster comments on this exchange, Clearly, if Norquist
hadnt converted to Islam, or werent in the process of doing so, he would simply have
answered no. (No pagination)
Norquists marriage to a Muslim woman further supports the contention that the
GOP/Bush operative is no longer a Protestant. Pipes elaborates:
Indeed, Norquist married Samah Alrayyes, a Palestinian Muslim, on April 2, 2005, and
Islamic law limits a Muslim woman to marrying a man who is Muslim. This is not an
abstract dictum but a very serious imperative, with many honor killings having resulted
from a woman ignoring her familys wishes.
Alrayyes (now known as Samah Norquist) has radical Islamic credentials of her own;
she served as communications director at the Islamic Free Market Institute, the Islamist
organization Norquist helped found. Now, she is employed as a public affairs officer at
the U.S. Agency for International Development and so it appears that yet another
Islamist finds employment in a branch of the U.S. government. (No pagination)
Daniel Pipes is notorious for his anti-Arab, anti-Muslim writings that verge on paranoia.
However, his contentions concerning Norquist are supported by the facts and seem to
be quite sound. It is interesting to find that Samah Norquist is an employee of the U.S.
Agency for International Development (USAID). This government organization has
actually been involved in social engineering projects meant to spread a violent and
radical form of Islam. Using the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan as a pretext, USAID
provided Afghan school children with textbooks filled with violent images and militant

Islamic teachings (Stephens and Ottaway, no pagination). The Washington

Posts Stephens and Ottaway continue:
THE PRIMERS, which were filled with talk of jihad and featured drawings of guns,
bullets, soldiers and mines, have served since then as the Afghan school systems core
curriculum. Even the Taliban used the American-produced books, though the radical
movement scratched out human faces in keeping with its strict fundamentalist code.
(No pagination)
Stephens and Ottaway further inform us that the textbooks were replete with violent
images and language:
Children were taught to count with illustrations showing tanks, missiles and land mines,
agency officials said. They acknowledged that at the time it also suited U.S. interests to
stoke hatred of foreign invaders. (Stephens & Ottaway, no pagination)
According to Stephens and Ottaway, the material shocked and disturbed some: An aid
worker in the region reviewed an unrevised 100-page book and counted 43 pages
containing violent images or passages (no pagination). The article elaborates:
One page from the texts of that period shows a resistance fighter with a bandolier and a
Kalashnikov slung from his shoulder. The soldiers head is missing.
Above the soldier is a verse from the Koran. Below is a Pashtu tribute to the
mujaheddin [sic], who are described as obedient to Allah. Such men will sacrifice their
wealth and life itself to impose Islamic law on the government, the text says. (Stephens
& Ottaway, no pagination)
USAID poured money hand over fist into this social engineering project. Stephens and
Ottaway elaborate:
Published in the dominant Afghan languages of Dari and Pashtu, the textbooks were
developed in the early 1980s under an AID [Agency for International Development]
grant to the University of Nebraska-Omaha and its Center for Afghanistan Studies. The
agency spent $51 million on the universitys education programs in Afghanistan from
1984 to 1994. (No pagination)
With Samah Norquist working for a government organization guilty of spreading violent
Islam, and Grover Norquist tied to extremists such as Alamoudi and the American
Muslim Council, it seems safe to say that the couple are in the radicalization business.
Furthermore, if Grover Norquist has truly converted to Islam, he is in the perfect
position to solidify ties between the government and Islamic extremists. He is also a
perfect shepherd for government-sponsored terrorists. Evidence suggests that Norquist
may already be acting in that capacity. The case of Operation Green Quest provides us
with this evidence.

Operation Green Quest

Operation Green Quest was a Treasury Department task force that conducted a series
of raids against several Islamic groups. Grover Norquist led the crusade to condemn

these raids as civil rights violations (Shwartz, no pagination). However, was Norquist
really concerned with civil rights when he condemned Green Quest? The truth was that
several of Green Quests targets were connected to the government and to several
different elites. The possibility that this would be discovered probably made Norquist
uneasy.
One of Green Quests targets was the Herndon office of Jamal Barzinji (Schwartz, no
pagination). Concerning Barzinji, Stephen Schwartz writes: In 1980, he was listed in
local public records as a representative of the World Assembly of Muslim Youth
(WAMY), an arm of the Saudi regime with offices in Virginia (no pagination). Barzinjis
involvement with WAMY suggests a government connection. Journalist Greg Palast
discovered that the Bush Administration had effectively killed an FBI investigation into
WAMY prior to the September 11, 2001 attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade
Center (145). Osama bin Ladens younger brother, Abdullah, was the president of
WAMY (Schwartz, no pagination).The WAMY investigation was blocked and then
unblocked after the attacks, putting the lie to the idea that Osama was merely a black
sheep and the rest of the Bin Laden clan was not involved in terrorism (Palast 245).
It is also very interesting to note that the WAMY headquarters was in Falls Church,
Virginia (Palast 144). This is strangely close to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.
Osama bin Laden is essentially a CIA creation. In 1979, Bin Laden went to Afghanistan
to fight the Soviets (Moran, no pagination). Osama came to head the Maktab alKhidamar, also known as the MAK (no pagination). This organization would act as a
front through which money, arms, and fighters were supplied for the Afghan war (no
pagination). According to MSNBCs Michael Moran, hidden puppeteers controlled the
MAK:
What the CIA bio conveniently fails to specify (in its unclassified form, at least) is that
the MAK was nurtured by Pakistans state security services, the Inter-Services
Intelligence agency, or ISI, the CIAs primary conduit for conducting the covert war
against Moscows occupation. (No pagination)
Even after the war in Afghanistan was over, Bin Laden was still regarded by the CIA as
an admirable freedom fighter:
Though he has come to represent all that went wrong with the CIAs reckless strategy
there, by the end of the Afghan war in 1989, bin Laden was still viewed by the agency
as something of a dilettante-a rich Saudi boy gone to war and welcomed home by the
Saudi monarchy he so hated as something of a hero. (Moran, no pagination)
Unfortunately, evidence suggests that Bin Ladens connection to the American
Intelligence Community continued up to the present and extends to the rest of the Bin
Laden family, some of whom are just as involved in terrorism as Osama. Peter L.
Bergen points out that the Bin Laden construction firm receives legal advice from the
white-shoe law firm Sullivan and Cromwell (49). The Sullivan and Cromwell legal firm
is one of the most powerful on Wall Street and has been known to collaborate with
enemies of the United States before. These enemies included Nazi clients such as I.G.
Farben (the outfit responsible for running a slave factory at Auschwitz), Fritz Thyssen,
and Gestapo General Kurt Von Schroeder (Keith 24). Sullivan and Cromwell connect to
the Intelligence Community through the Dulles family. Brothers Allen and John Foster

Dulles were lawyers for Sullivan and Cromwell. Both supervised the writing of the
National Security Act of 1947, which led to the creation of the CIA. Allen would serve as
a Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) until President John Kennedy fired him for the
Bay of Pigs fiasco.
In his article entitled Bin Laden Comes Home to Roost, Moran suggests that Osama
was propped up by the Agency for reasons other than doing battle with our Cold War
nemesis:
The CIA, ever mindful of the need to justify its mission, had conclusive evidence by
the mid-1980s of the deepening crisis of infrastructure within the Soviet Union. The
CIA, as its deputy director Robert Gates acknowledged under congressional
questioning 1992, had decided to keep that evidence from President Reagan and his
top advisors and instead continued to grossly exaggerate Soviet military and
technological capabilities in its annual Soviet Military Power report right up to 1990.
(No pagination)
The Agency wished to keep Osama in the game in spite of his irrelevance in the Cold
War crusade against Communism. In fact, it was so important to the CIA that they were
willing to present a fraudulent assessment of Soviet military capabilities to the
President. Certain elites and criminal factions within the U.S. Intelligence Community
obviously wanted to create the Bin Laden threat to act as a pretext for their own
agendas. WAMY was a part of the Bin Laden network that receive protection from the
Bush Administration. By condemning Green Quests move against WAMY
representative Barzinji, Norquist was perhaps trying to protect both the Bush
Administration and his Islamic extremist clients.

Ptech
Another target of Green Quest raids was the Boston-area computer software firm
known as Ptech. (Whose War on Terror? no pagination). This company had sensitive
government contracts worth millions of dollars (no pagination). Those government
organizations that could be counted among Ptechs clients were the Air Force, the
Energy Department, and the FBI (no pagination). One of the firms main investors was
Yasin Al-Qadi, who MSNBC describes as a wealthy Saudi businessman whom the
Bush administration had formally designated a terrorist financier under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (no pagination). When company whistleblowers
tried to alert the FBI to criminal and terrorist activity at Ptech, the Bureau strangely did
nothing (no pagination).
Ptech was still in business in 2002, six months after the Bush administration had
designated its main investor a terrorist financier (Hopsicker, FBI Shut Down
Investigation Into Saudi Terror Cell In Boston, no pagination). One of the places Ptech
came looking for business was one of Americas largest banks, J.P. Morgan Chase (no
pagination). Ptech had been invited to give a presentation at J.P. Morgan Chase by the
banks consultant, Indira Singh. Singh had no idea what she was stepping off into.
Investigative journalist Daniel Hopsicker tells the story:

Indira Singh, who later became a whistleblower, was an unwitting eyewitness to the
train wreck.
I invited Ptech to come down and give a presentation and a customized demo to JP
Morgan Chase, states Singh, who was a consultant to the bank on risk architecture,
an arcane software specialty which calculates enterprise risk. In one of the storys
many ironic twists, Singh was at the time designing a system to help JP Morgan Chase
detect terrorist money laundering.
When Ptech showed up, Singh quickly realized that she was witnessing her worst fears
about compromised security come true. Within half an hour on the premises, I knew
something was up, she says. They had almost immediately raised about six of my red
flags, to the point where I walked over to my desk and picked up the phone, and began
making phone calls.
She talked with a respected industry figure who had once worked at Ptech. He was
shocked to learn that I had invited Ptech on the premises. He told me the company
belonged to Yasin Qadi.
In the course of what would otherwise have been just another day at the bank, Indira
Singh made the amazing discovery that the firm in front of her at the moment was
owned by Saudis, including Yasin Qadi, with suspected as well as proven ties to the
terrorists who carried out the 9/11 attack.
All this left her feeling more than a little surprised. (No pagination) Naturally, Singh
decided to alert her bosses at J.P. Morgan Chase to the danger. Their response was
nothing less than shocking. Hopsicker reports:
When Singh alerted authorities, and her employer, what she encountered was the
inexplicable wrath of a top Wall Street Bank, as well as an official wall of silence at the
FBI.
I took everything I had at that point back to my boss at JP Morgan Chase, she states.
He didnt want to deal with it. So I called his boss, because at this point I realized I was
sitting on dynamite.
The various heads of the security functions at the bank set up an interview with me,
and it quickly escalated to the banks General Auditor, who introduced himself to me as
JP Morgan Chases chief thug.
We didnt know banks like JP Morgan had thugs, we said.
He introduced himself as the General Auditor, said Singh, but he said, for the real
purposes of what he does at JP Morgan Chase, I am the chief thug.
He basically told me to keep my mouth shut and look the other way, and enjoy a
wonderful life here at JP Morgan, and if I didnt I was out. (No pagination)
Why would J.P. Morgan Chase cover for a firm with ties to terrorism? There are, of
course, financial reasons. J.P. Morgan Chase might be able to make a good profit from

collaboration with Ptech. However, there is also a little known political reason as well.
J.P. Morgan Chase used to be two different financial institutions. One of those
institutions was J.P. Morgan Bank. Morgan Bank founder, J.P. Morgan, attended the
University of Gottingen in Germany (Sutton 120). According to deceased researcher
Antony Sutton, the University of Gottingen was a center of Hegelian activism (120).
Sutton further states that German Hegelianism is apparent in J.P. Morgans approach
to political parties-Morgan used them all (120, emphasis in original). The Hegelian
dialectic involves the engagement of two ideational entities in an ostensibly adversarial
dynamic. However, neither of two ideational entities involved are dichotomously related.
The conflict that ensues between the two is superficial at best and, eventually, results in
their synthesis into a new ideational entity. This synthesis amalgamates the worst
features of the opposing camps. The Hegelian tradition in Morgan firm may have
continued on after its merger with Chase. If this is the case, J.P. Morgan Chases
collaboration with Ptech may be part of the construction of a dialectical camp. In this
case, that dialectical camp is Islamofascist terrorism. America (thesis) clashes with
Islamofascism (antithesis) which leads to the rise of an American Empire (synthesis)
spoken so much about by the neoconservative faction of the elite in their Project for a
New American Century (PNAC) documents.
Indira Singh also had an opportunity to speak to the FBI concerning Ptech. The results
were equally shocking. Hopsicker reports:
After talking to the Boston FBI, Singh said she had been shocked and frustrated to
learn that the FBI had not alerted any of the government agencies using Ptech software
that there were questions about the companys ties to suspected terrorist fund-raisers.
(FBI Shut Down Investigation Into Saudi Terror Cell In Boston, no pagination)
The FBI seems to have no desire to touch Ptech. There is however, evidence that the
Bureau has tried to protect the firm from scrutiny. According to MSNBC, shortly after
Green Quest began investigating Ptech the FBI stepped in and unsuccessfully tried to
take control of the case (No pagination). Interestingly, the FBI and its parent agency,
the Justice Department, sought to gain control over Green Quest after it folded into
Homeland Security (no pagination). Needless to say, such an acquisition would make it
easier for the FBI and the Justice Department to disrupt attempts to probe
organizations and individuals with suspected ties to terrorism. There seems to be a
criminal element at the Bureau and Justice that believe terrorists are to be shepherded,
not hunted. It should raise more than a few eyebrows to learn that Michael Chertoff
pushed for the FBI/Justice takeover of Green Quest while he was DOJ Criminal
Division chief (no pagination). This is the same Michael Chertoff who is now the head of
Homeland Security. It is also the same Michael Chertoff who is related to Ben Chertoff,
the man who wrote a piece for Popular Mechanics claiming that all questions about
9/11 are simply baseless conspiracy theories. Ultimately, all the article did was knock
over a few straw men in a poor attempt to label anyone looking into government
complicity in 9/11 clinically insane.
The Ptech case raises an important question about Grover Norquist. When Norquist
condemned the Green Quest raid, was he really concerned with civil rights? Is it more
likely that he feared an investigation would reveal that sometimes terrorists received
protection from the FBI and do business with large Wall Street firms?

The Saar Foundation, Khalid bin Mahfouz, and BCCI

Perhaps another reason Norquist didnt like the Green Quest raid stems from the fact
that the Saar Foundation was the keystone of the network being investigated
(Schwartz, no pagination). The Saar Foundation is connected to Khalid bin Mahfouz
(no pagination). Just who is Bin Mahfouz? Incredibly, he was the director of the Bank of
Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) (Khalid bin Mahfouz, no pagination). The
BCCI was a hotbed of scandal. Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega and Palestinian
terrorist Abu Nidal were just two of the individuals in a rogue gallery tied to BCCI
(Bainerman 286).
Therefore, it was shocking when the CIA engaged in a cover-up of the BCCI scandal.
The Agencys first report over the BCCI in 1986 only cryptically referred to the banks
methods unorthodox and unconventional (286). A later CIA report was equally
unacceptable. Israeli investigative reporter Joel Bainerman elaborates:
A later CIA report, a 30-page document issued in May 1989, contained mini-profiles of
BCCI managers and a long list of its branches and shareholders. Even by 1989, the
only thing the CIA would admit that it knew about the bank was that it was a source of
undetermined reliability and that BCCI established a Washington, D.C., presence in
late 1987 with the purchase of First American Bankshares. It goes on to describe BCCI
as a bank that has a reputation for doing business with anyone, and using whatever
means are available to preserve anonymity when the depositor request it. (286)
Why was the CIA being so secretive? Richard Kerr, who acted as the DCI prior to
Robert Gates being chosen to run the Agency in 1991, probably spilled the beans when
he revealed that the CIA held accounts at the BCCI (286). While Kerr claimed the
accounts were ordinary and lawful and honest, it begs the question why the CIA was
not honest and up front about the BCCI from the offset. All the secrecy and
concealment suggest the Agency had something to hide about its relationship with the
BCCI. Perhaps they did not wish for it to be known that $2 billion in U.S. aid had been
funneled to Mujahadeen rebels through the bank (287). These were the same people
who were radicalized by textbooks made with USAID money.
It is safe to say that people in high places were watching over BCCI. However, it would
be wrong to accuse Ronald Reagan of being one of those individuals just because
much of the banks nefarious activities occurred during his time as President. Webster
Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin provide a description of Reagan at the time:
Ronald Reagan was 70 years old when he took office, the oldest man ever to be
inaugurated as President. His mind wandered; long fits of slumber crept over his
cognitive faculties. On some days, he may have kept bankers hours with his papers
and briefing books and meetings in the Oval Office, but he needed a long nap most
afternoons and became distraught if he could not have one. His custom was to
delegate all administrative decisions to the cabinet members, to the executive
departments and agencies. Policy questions were delegated to the White House staff,
who prepared the options and then guided Reagans decisions among the pre-defined
options. This was the staff that composed not just Reagans speeches, but the script of
his entire life: Normally, every word that Reagan spoke in meetings and conferences,

every line down to and including Good morning, Senator, every word was typed on
three-by-five file cards from which Reagan would read (363-64).
Clearly, Reagan was a puppet, not a puppeteer. On the other hand, George H. W. Bush
can be described as a master manipulator. Furthermore, Bush is connected to BCCI
through Little Rock billionaire Jackson Stephens. Joel Bainerman explains Jacksons
connections to Bush and BCCI:
The Stephens group investment firm, Stephens Inc., is reportedly to be worth nearly $1
billion. Stephens helped BCCI executives in the late 1970s to find key American
investment opportunities, such as First American Bankshares. He was a major
contributor to President Bush and part of Team 100, a Republican group where
membership required a $100,000 donation to Bushs election campaign. Stephens
wife, Mary Anne, was the 1988 co-chairman of the Bush for President drive. In
September 1977, Jimmy Carters former Office of Management and Budget director
Bert Lance recommended that BCCI officials meet his good friend Jackson Stephens to
discuss acquisition of National Bank of Georgia. Stephens met with Agha Hasan Abedi,
founder and head of BCCI. Stephens was a defendant in the suit against BCCI in its
attempt to take over First American Bankshares. (293-4)
Why did Bill Clinton fail to look into BCCI after Bush was ousted? The answer to that
question lies with Jackson Stephens. Joel Bainerman explains:
When Arkansas governor Bill Clinton was running for governor in October 1990, his
campaign was in deep financial trouble. He called on Jackson Stephens, a member of
the Bush 100 Club in Little Rock, and the prime mover behind Harken Energys bid to
win a lucrative oil-drilling contract in Bahrain. Stephens helped Clinton raise nearly
$100,000, and receive a $2 million line of credit from the Worthen National Bank. This
was done, it is believed, through one of Stephens associates, Curt Bradbury, a former
employee of his who is now chief executive officer of Worthen National Bank. Jackson
Stephens is chairman of the bank. (305)
Did Norquist really believe that the Green Quest raids were a civil rights violation? An
investigation that could potentially lead to George Bush, Jackson Stephens, BCCI, and
CIA with a little Bill Clinton thrown into the mix has nothing to do with civil rights.
However, it does have everything to do with political conspiracy and elite criminality.

Disinformation
BCCI also connects to another interesting character named Adnan Kashoggi. Seymour
Hersh elaborates on the connection between Kashoggi and the BCCI:
During the Reagan Administration, Khashoggi was one of the middlemen between
Oliver North, in the White House, and the mullahs in Iran in what became known as the
Iran-Contra scandal. Khashoggi subsequently claimed that he lost ten million dollars
that he had put up to obtain embargoed weapons for Iran which were to be bartered
(with Presidential approval) for American hostages. The scandals of those times
seemed to feed off each other: a congressional investigation revealed that Khashoggi
had borrowed much of the money for the weapons from the Bank of Credit and

Commerce International (B.C.C.I.), whose collapse, in 1991, defrauded thousands of

depositors and led to years of inquiry and litigation. (No pagination)
Kashoggi also worked with Mohammad Hammoud, the front man for BCCI Holdings
Luxembourg (Bainerman 293). Even after the BCCI collapse, Kashoggi remained
connected to people very high up in the government. Seymour Hersh explains:
Khashoggi is still brokering. In January of this year, he arranged a private lunch, in
France, to bring together Harb Saleh al-Zuhair, a Saudi industrialist whose family
fortune includes extensive holdings in construction, electronics, and engineering
companies throughout the Middle East, and Richard N. Perle, the chairman of the
Defense Policy Board, who is one of the most outspoken and influential American
advocates of war with Iraq.
The Defense Policy Board is a Defense Department advisory group composed primarily
of highly respected former government officials, retired military officers, and academics.
Its members, who serve without pay, include former national-security advisers,
Secretaries of Defense, and heads of the C.I.A. The board meets several times a year
at the Pentagon to review and assess the countrys strategic defense policies. (No
pagination)
When Adnan Kashoggi is not brokering, he is busy spreading disinformation to muddy
the waters surrounding 9/11. Investigative journalist Daniel Hopsicker has discovered
that Adnan Kashoggi owns the business of John Gray, author of Men are from Mars,
Women are from Venus and a primary financier of the misnamed 9/11 Truth Movement
(Hopsicker, The 9.11 Heroin Connection, no pagination). One of Hopsickers
anonymous sources puts the relationship between Kashoggi and John Gray in proper
perspective:
To say that John Gray is in business with Adnan Khashoggi doesnt portray the
relationship in quite the right light, stated another observer, asking to remain
anonymous. Khashoggi owns John Gray. He bought his whole Mars-Venus shtick, his
company. Gray works for him. (No pagination)
The 9/11 Truth Movement basically holds that 9/11 was an inside job. This contention
puts government agents at the scene of the crime planting demolition charges in the
WTC buildings and shooting missiles at the Pentagon. If the building was an Iranian
government facility in Tehran, then maybe an American soldier or intelligence agent
would be willing to shoot a missile at it or blow it up. However, it is doubtful an American
soldier or intelligence agent would do the same in America. The 9/11 Truth Movement
also holds that the hijackers were patsies. As Hopsicker eloquently points out, there is
no basis to believe that the hijackers were patsies because of the numerous examples
of Arab suicide bombers throughout history (no pagination). If Islamofascists would be
willing to conduct suicide bombings in the Middle East, then they would hold no
reservations about conducting suicide attacks in America.
Ultimately, all of the 9/11 Truth theories are nonsense. From the standpoint of
scholarship, the contentions of the 9/11 Truth Movement are intellectually lazy. Instead
of following the money trail or connecting the dots between the people involved, the
9/11 Truth Movement speculates about elements that are not even pertinent to the

crime. However, from the standpoint of disinformation, the 9/11 Truth Movement is
priceless. The 9/11 Truth Movement diverts attention away from Islamofascists who
were involved in the crime that were protected and shepherded by criminal factions in
the United States government. Thats why Adnan Kashoggi and his puppet, John Gray,
are throwing money at these trash-peddlers. Yes, there was government complicity in
the 9/11 attacks. However, the attacks were carried out by surrogates, many of who
were Islamofascists who may have not even been aware of Western elites manipulating
things from behind the scenes. Terrorism is almost always surrogate warfare. Surrogate
warfare is not the same as an inside job.
9/11 Truth Movement researchers also have a tendency to present those who will
listen with the picture of a monolithic conspiracy behind 9/11. The monolithic view
contends that the U.S. government as a whole conducted the attacks. This gives a very
distinct anti-American flavor to the 9/11 Truth Movement. It comes as little surprise that
the anti-American, communist Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez has come out
supporting the 9/11 Truth Movements contention that the buildings were destroyed by
demolition charges (Chavez says U.S. may have orchestrated 9/11, no pagination).
Does Chavez have a reason for diverting peoples attention away from the
Islamofascist aspect of 9/11? Chavez, like criminal elements in the U.S government,
may have supported the Islamofascist terrorist network. Juan Diaz Castillo, a former
Venezuelan Air Force major, claims he was charged by Chavez with the job of
organizing a million dollars worth of assistance from Chavez to Al Qaeda (Freitas, no
pagination).
The evidence overwhelmingly points to factions of the U.S. government being involved
in 9/11. However, the government as a whole is not the culprit. Several government
employees, such as Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, and others were doing their jobs.
The culprit is a criminal element within our government. Do not think for one moment
that Washington, Jefferson, or any of the other Founding Fathers constructed our
constitutional government to be a system of enslavement. Parasitical criminal forces
have latched on to the legitimate government. This criminal element has evolved into a
shadow government running parallel with the constitutional government. The shadow
government periodically prostitutes portions of our government to the power elite. They
also sanction the power elites private forces to actually act as extensions of the
government. So, in the end, oligarchs existing above government are the ultimate
villains. Sorry if this bursts the bubble of anti-government types.
Fortunately, some of the more responsible researchers are not buying the garbage.
According to German author Matthias Broeckers, when researcher Michel
Chossudovsky learned of Grays financing of the International 9/11 Inquiry meeting, he
demanded the that organizers drop Gray (Hopsicker, no pagination). While
Chossudovskys warning was ignored, his actions clearly illustrate that not everyone is
fooled by Kashoggis illusion. Essentially, Norquist and Kashoggi share the same job.
Both want to divert peoples attention away from a government-sponsored Islamofascist
terrorist network. Norquist diverts with a debate over civil rights. Kashoggi diverts with
talk of demolition charges in the buildings, remote-controlled planes equipped with
bunker buster bombs, missiles fired at the Pentagon, and holograms.

Iran-Contra Connection

Adnan Kashoggi, Khalid Bin Mahfouz, and BCCI are not just names associated with the
shepherding and protecting of the Islamofascist terrorist network. They are also names
associated with the Iran-Contra affair. Curiously, several members of the Iran-Contra
fraternity have reemerged in the Bush Administration. Among them are Otto Reich,
John Pointdexter, Elliott Abrams, and John Negroponte. There seems to be a
connection between the shepherding and protection of the Islamofascist terrorist
network and Iran-Contra. What is the commonality? Perhaps the answer lies in an
exchange between Representative Jack Brooks and Senator Daniel Inouye during the
1987 Iran-Contra hearings:
Brooks: Colonel North, in your work at the N.S.C., were you not assigned, at one time,
to work on plans for the continuity of government in the event of a major disaster?
Brendan Sullivan (Norths counsel): Mr. Chairman?
Senator Daniel Inouye: I believe that question touches upon a highly sensitive and
classified area so may I request that you not touch upon that?
Representative Brooks: I was particularly concerned, Mr. Chairman, because I read in
the Miami papers, and several others, that there had been a plan developed, by that
same agency, a contingency plan in the event of emergency, that would suspend the
American Constitution. And I was deeply concerned about it and wondered if that was
the area in which he had worked I believe that it was and I wanted to get his
confirmation.
Senator Inouye: May I most respectfully request that matter not be touched upon, at
this stage. If we wish to get into this, Im certain arrangements can be made for an
executive session. (Keith 104)
It seems the Iran-Contra fraternity was in the midst of building a dictatorship here in the
United States prior to being discovered. They may have returned to finish the job. The
Islamofascist terrorist network is providing the pretext. John Poindexters Total
Information Awareness (TIA) program provides a case in point. Daniel Schorr, a
journalist for Christian Science Monitor, examines TIA:
Deep in the recesses of the Pentagon is the Office of the Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA). DARPA is where Vice Adm. John Poindexter (USN ret.)
hangs out these days, working on TIA. TIA stands for Total Information Awareness. The
project, which is budgeted at $10 million this year and expected to get more next year,
has been getting bad press. That is in part because its Orwellian-sounding purpose is
to create a centralized database of personal information about Americans.
Cutting-edge technology would be used to gather everything that the computer age has
to offer, from travel plans to pharmacy prescriptions. Pentagon officials say its meant to
be a tool in the war against terrorism, not an invasion of privacy of innocent citizens.
Well, maybe. But that would sound more reassuring if it were not for the identity of the
project manager. (No pagination)
Indeed, Poindexter is certainly not one of the most ethical people who have ever lived.
His past is replete with scandal and fraud, more than enough to preclude him from such

a sensitive position as project manager of a national security program. Schorr proceeds

to unveil Poindexters shady past:
Admiral Poindexter is probably better known for destroying information than for
gathering it. Before a congressional investigating committee in 1986, he admitted that,
as President Reagans national security adviser, he destroyed evidence in connection
with the Iran-contra affair. Specifically, he tore up the only signed copy of a document
called a presidential finding that retroactively authorized shipment of arms to Iran in
return for the release of American hostages in Lebanon.
He testified that he did this to avoid embarrassment to Mr. Reagan. Poindexter, like
Oliver North, who reported to him, was convicted in federal district court of lying to
Congress and of obstruction. The conviction was overturned on technical grounds by
an appeals court majority of two Reagan-appointed judges, Douglas Ginsburg and
David Sentelle, over the vigorous dissent of Carter-appointed judge Abner Mikva. (No
pagination)
Yet, despite Poindexters dubious past, the Bush Administration had no qualms about
employing him in such a sensitive post. Schorr states:
The Bush administration has shown no inclination to alter Poindexters sensitive
assignment. Mr. Rumsfeld says: I would recommend people take a deep breath.
Nothing terrible is going to happen. (No pagination)
What was the nature of Poindexters Total Information Awareness project? What was its
true magnitude and scope? Washington Times journalist Audrey Hudson provides a
glimpse:
In what one critic has called a supersnoops dream, the Defense Departments Total
Information Awareness program would be authorized to collect every type of available
public and private data in what the Pentagon describes as one centralized grand
database. (No pagination)
This data would include: e-mail, Internet use, travel, credit-card purchases, phone and
bank records of foreigners (no pagination). Further elaborating on the ominous scope
of this centralized database, New York Times columnist William Safire wrote:
To this computerized dossier on your private life from commercial sources, add every
piece of information that government has about you passport application, drivers
license and bridge toll records, judicial and divorce records, complaints from nosy
neighbors to the FBI, your lifetime paper trail plus the latest hidden camera surveillance
and you have the supersnoops dream: a Total Information Awareness about every
U.S. citizen. (Qutd. In Hudson, no pagination)
Needless to say, the TIA program would enable the Bush Administration to erect a
dictatorship in the name of fighting the War on Terror. However, this would be no
ordinary dictatorship. It would be a scientific dictatorship, also known as a technocracy.
The particular variety of technocracy that TIA would help establish is what author
Charles Stross refers to as a Panopticon Singularity. A Panopticon Singularity is a

technocracy that technology has transformed into the perfect surveillance state.
Charles Stross elaborates:
A Panopticon Singularity is the logical outcome if the burgeoning technologies of the
singularity are funneled into automating law enforcement. Previous police states were
limited by manpower, but the panopticon singularity substitutes technology, and
ultimately replaces human conscience with a brilliant but merciless prosthesis.
If a panopticon singularity emerges, youd be well advised to stay away from
Massachusetts if you and your partner arent married. Dont think about smoking a joint
unless you want to see the inside of one of the labour camps where over 50% of the
population sooner or later go. Dont jaywalk, chew gum in public, smoke, exceed the
speed limit, stand in front of fire exit routes, or wear clothing that violates the city dress
code (passed on the nod in 1892, and never repealed because everybody knew
nobody would enforce it and it would take up valuable legislative time). You wont be
able to watch those old DVDs of Friends you copied during the naughty oughties
because if you stick them in your player itll call the copyright police on you. Youd better
not spend too much time at the bar, or your insurance premiums will rocket and your
boss might ask you to undergo therapy. You might be able to read a library book or play
a round of a computer game, but your computer will be counting the words you read
and monitoring your pulse so that it can bill you for the excitement it has delivered. (No
pagination)
Even the official emblem of the Total Information Awareness program semiotically
gesticulated towards the rise of a technocratic dictatorship. Schorr concludes his
examination of the program with the following statement:
Outside Poindexters Pentagon office is a logo showing an all-seeing eye on top of a
pyramid and the slogan, Scientia est potentia (Knowledge is power). The question
is: How much power over knowledge about us should be entrusted to an admitted
destroyer of federal documents? (No pagination)
Extensive press coverage of TIA led to the Pentagon shutting the program down and
Poindexter leaving the government (Bamford, no pagination). However, the TIAs
method of collecting vast heaps of information, known in national security circles as
data mining, did not disappear. Initiatives that elites cannot establish in plain view,
they usually sneak through the back door. It was recently revealed that, in the fall of
2001, President Bush secretly ordered the National Security Agency (NSA) to sidestep
a special court and carry out warrantless spying on American citizens (Bamford, no
pagination).
The legality of the Presidents actions is questionable. Under the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act, before spying domestically on Americans suspected of having terrorist
ties, the NSA must first go before a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court and show
probable cause to obtain a warrant (Bamford, no pagination). Persuading a FISA court
to give the NSA the warrants it desired would have been relatively simple, as James
Bamford points out:
The court rarely turns the government down. Since it was established in 1978, the court
has granted about 19,000 warrants; it has only rejected five. And even in those cases

the government has the right to appeal to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of
Review, which in 27 years has only heard one case. And should the appeals court also
reject the warrant request, the government could then appeal immediately to a closed
session of the Supreme Court. (No pagination)
Given the ease with which the NSA might have procured the required warrants it is
shocking that the Presidents secret program bypassed the FISA court entirely. Perhaps
the evidence suggesting probable cause was extremely flimsy. It would not be the first
time that such was the case. J. Edgar Hoover was convinced that Martin Luther King Jr.
was a subversive and tirelessly snooped into the famous Civil Rights leaders private
life. Today it is known that, while Kings private life left much to be desired, the case that
he was somehow a conscious agent of Moscow was weak. Perhaps Bush did not want
take a chance, no matter how low the odds, because his oligarchical upbringing has
made it hard for him to take no for an answer.
However, there is another possibility. Perhaps the neoconservative faction of the elite
are determined to establish the Panopticon Singularity before this Presidents time in
office is over. Such a task would call for circumventing every safeguard the law
provides. The President may believe he has done just that by having the NSA spy on
hundreds, perhaps even thousands, of Americans just for a few days or weeks at a time
(Bamford, no pagination). Such fishing expeditions would allow the President to argue
that the eavesdropping was short-term and that FISA does not apply because it is for
long-term monitoring (Bamford, no pagination). Even still, Bamford contends that such
a method is precisely the type of abuse the FISA court was put in place to stop (No
pagination). The President may be establishing a dangerous precedent, the end of
which is a fully functional Panopticon Singularity. All of this done in the name of fighting
the very Islamofascist terrorist network that criminal elements in the government are
sponsoring.

Conclusion
While it is discomforting, the conclusion is inescapable. There are criminal elements
within the U.S. government that are guilty of protecting and shepherding the very
Islamofascists they claim to be fighting. The power elite have an unhealthy influence on
the American political system. A disturbing consequence of this influence is the fact that
our government periodically goes to bed with known enemies of the United States.
Whoever said, When you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas knew whereof he
spoke. The enemy is now within the gates. If America had an effective internal security
apparatus to weed people with conflicts of interest out of government service, this
problem would probably be nonexistent. After all, government service is a privilege, not
a right. The American people have a right to a government staffed with decent people.
However, America does not have an effective internal security apparatus. The lack may
be deliberate; as such an apparatus would have the potential of shining a light on
people in very high places.
For instance, one person who would probably come under heavy scrutiny is none other
than Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz. Recently it was revealed that Wolfowitz
was engaged in a discreet romance with Shaha Riza, a communications advisor at
the World Bank (Leiby, no pagination). The Oxford-educated Riza was born in Tunisia

and grew up in Saudi Arabia (no pagination). She is a British citizen who claims to be a
feminist, not exactly the qualities of an Islamofascist (no pagination). However, is this
really the case or a just a cover? Has Wolfowitz been compromised? Is the man now
working for the other side? Only an in-depth inquiry into the relationship between
Wolfowitz and Riza could answer these questions. None seems to be forthcoming.
What are the motives behind this treason? The first motive is periodic loyalty to an
ideological kissing cousin. Currently, the government has come under the control of the
neoconservative wing of the power elite. The neoconservatives are Trotskyites who
have blended their Trotskyist beliefs with the fascism of Leo Strauss. Because of this
fascist additive, neoconservatives share much more in common with the Islamofascists
than they care to admit.
However, the most important motive for protecting Islamofascists is the fact that they
provide a pretext for world government. With the help of certain financiers who view
neoconservatism as politically expedient, the neoconservatives have risen up through
the political ranks to become a faction of the power elite. The power elite possess a
shared vision of a world without borders, a New World Order. Neoconservatives are no
exception to the rule. Without Islamofascism, there is no war on terrorism. Without the
war on terrorism, there is no American Empire. The American Empire is merely the final
stepping-stone to world government. Alexander Joffe made this clear in an article for
the neocon connected Journal of International Security Affairs entitled The Empire that
Dared Not Speak Its Name. In the article, Joffe states: The best way to preserve the
American empire is to eventually give it up. Setting the stage for global governance can
only be done with American leadership and American-led institutions (no pagination).
The neoconservative crusade for world government calls for an expanded military
campaign in the Middle East, the region of the world that is considered the epicenter of
Islamofascism. This campaign will employ a method which neoconservative Michael
Ledeen refers to as creative destruction. Ledeen defines this term:
Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We
tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture,
and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of
energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and
shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies,
they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we
are there, for our very existence-our existence, not our policies-threatens their
legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to
advance our historic mission. (212-213)
In a nutshell, creative destruction is the tearing down and rebuilding of every aspect of
a society. It may be no accident that Ledeens creative destruction bears eerie
resemblance to the Masonic dictum of Ordo ab Chao (order out of chaos). Ledeen
collaborated with Francesco Pazienza, an Italian Secret Service agent and member of
the notorious Propaganda Due (P2) Masonic lodge headed up by Licio Gelli
(Szymanski, no pagination). It is quite possible that the creative destruction is merely
the Masonic idea of Ordo ab Chao recycled by Ledeen and given a new name. The
Islamofascists have been swept up into the game for a New World Order. When the
American Empire resumes its march across the Middle East, it may eventually become

apparent that the Islamofascists involvement in the game has made them beggars to
their own demise. Creative destruction could tear down both extremist and moderate
Islam. Islamic culture has been marked for extinction. Christian and Judaic cultures are
meant to follow, as all the Abrahamic faiths are at odds with the oligarchical
Weltanschauung.
However, there is another possibility to consider. Maybe the neoconservative faction
could miscalculate and lose control of the Islamofascist network. While it is true that the
neoconservatives are using the Islamofascists, it is also safe to assume the
Islamofascists are milking the neoconservatives as well. What if the neoconservatives
cease to be useful to the Islamofascists? The very network the neoconservatives
facilitated the rise of could become too hard to manage. Islamofascism could actually
turn on the neoconservatives. In such a situation, all bets would be off. Who knows
which side would be the victor?
While many of the other elite factions do not agree with the neoconservatives imperial
approach to world government, all parties seem to agree that the Islamofascists are an
asset for now. At least one member of the ruling elite, former CIA executive director
A.B. Buzzy Krongard has publicly stated that Bin Ladens capture might prove
counter-productive (Allen-Mills, no pagination). Krongard tried to justify his position by
claiming that Bin Ladens capture would result in a power struggle among Al-Qaeda
subordinates that would unleash a wave of terrorist attacks (Allen-Mills, no pagination).
However, Krongards argument strains credulity to the breaking point. In all likelihood,
Osamas apprehension would result in a terrible loss of morale for Al-Qaeda and
disorganization stemming from a serious leadership void. When you chop off the
snakes head, the body dies too. Truth be told, a world government needs enemies to
justify its existence. An invisible Bin Laden, who can be everywhere and nowhere at the
same time, provides just such a pretext.
The power elites collusion with the Islamofascists does not only jeopardize Americas
well being. It also places Americas ally in the Middle East, Israel, in a very dangerous
position. There is hardly a single Islamofascist group that does not steadfastly believe
in the destruction of Israel. However, thee power elite do not care if their collaboration
with Islamofascists results in Israel becoming a target. Recently, Israeli researcher
Barry Chamish had an opportunity to speak with a member of the Rothschild dynasty.
This family members statement captures the power elites attitude toward Israel.
Chamish tells the story:
I am in Salt Lake City. A lunch is arranged for me with Evelyn Rothschilds grandson
who has abandoned the family for Mormonism. He does not talk willingly but I learn that
just seven families are enjoying the fruits of the war. I ask him why they want to destroy
Israel. He smiles and notes, They created Israel as their personal toy. It makes them
richer and gives them more control. Its not going to be destroyed. (no pagination)
The power elite considers Israel a play-thing. Doubtless, they feel the exact same way
about America. Only ending the influence the power elite have over national
governments will end this sorry state of affairs. Until that time, do not think it strange if
current events have you feeling like someones toy.

Sources Cited
Allen-Mills, Tony. Let Bin Laden stay free, says CIA man. The Sunday Times. 9
January 2005.
Bainerman, Joel. The Crimes of a President. New York: S.P.I. Books, 1992.
Bamford, James. The Agency That Could be Big Brother. New York Times 25
December 2005.
Bergen, Peter L. Holy War Inc.: Inside the Secret World of Osama Bin Laden.
New York: Touchstone/Simon and Schuster, 2002.
Chamish, Barry. The Oslo War Erupts. BarryChamish.com. 19 July 2006.
Chavez says U.S. may have orchestrated 9/11. MSNBC. 12 September 2006.
Freitas, Johan. 9/11: Chavez financed Al Qaeda, details of $1M donation
emerge. Free Republic. 31 December 2002.
Gitell, Seth. STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: Grover Norquist and Abdurahman
Alamoudi. Boston Phoenix. 4 October 2001.
Greene, Richard Allen. Bushs language angers US Muslims. BBC. 12 August
2006.
Hersh, Seymour. Lunch With The Chairman. The New Yorker. 10 March 2003.
Hopsicker, Daniel. FBI SHUT DOWN Investigation Into Saudi Terror Cell In
Boston Mad Cow News.
o The 9.11 Heroin Connection. Mad Cow News. 6 September 2006.
Hudson, Audrey. A Supersnoops Dream. The Washington Times. 15 November
2002.
Joffe, Alexander. The Empire that Dared Not Speak its Name. Journal of
International Security Affairs. Summer 2003.
Keith, Jim. Casebook on Alternative 3: UFOs, Secret Societies, and World
Control. Georgia: IllumiNet Press, 1994.
Khalid bin Mahfouz. Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. 28 August 2006.
Ledeen, Michael. The War Against the Terror Masters. New York: St. Martins
Griffin, 2003.

 Leiby, Richard. What Will the Neighbors Say? Wolfowitz Romance Stirs
Gossip. Washington Post. 22 March 2005.
Moran, Michael. Bin Laden comes home to roost. MSNBC. 24 August 1998.
Palast, Greg. The Best Democracy Money Can Buy. London: Pluto Press, 2002.
Pipes, Daniel. Is Grover Norquist an Islamist? Daniel Pipes Blog. 14 April 2005.
Schorr, Daniel. Poindexter Redux. The Christian Science Monitor. 30 November
2002.
Schwartz, Stephen. Wahhabis in the Old Dominion. Weekly Standard. 8 April
2002.
Stephens, Joe and David B. Ottaway. From the U.S.A., the ABCs of
jihad. MSNBC. 2002.
Stross, Charles. The Panopticon Singularity. Whole Earth Review. 2002.
Sutton, Antony. Americas Secret Establishment. Billings, Mont.: Liberty House
Press, 1986.
Szymanski, Greg. Part Two: How Michael Ledeen Fits Into The Puzzle Of The
Strange Case Of Dr. Francesco Pazienza Donato. The Arctic Beacon. 21 March
2006.
Tarpley, Webster Griffin and Anton Chaitkin. George Bush: The Unauthorized
Biography. Washington, D.C.: Executive Intelligence Review, 1992.
Unger, Craig. House of Bush, House of Saud. New York: Scribner, 2004.
Whose War on Terror? Newsweek Web. 10 December 2003.
About the author
Paul D. Collins has studied suppressed history and the shadowy undercurrents of world
political dynamics for roughly eleven years. In 1999, he earned his Associate of Arts
and Science degree. In 2006, he completed his bachelors degree with a major in
liberal studies and a minor political science. Paul has authored another book
entitled The Hidden Face of Terrorism: The Dark Side of Social Engineering, From
Antiquity to September 11. Published in November 2002, the book is available online
from www.1stbooks.com, barnesandnoble.com, and also amazon.com. It can be
purchased as an e-book (ISBN 1-4033-6798-1) or in paperback format (ISBN 1-40336799-X). Paul also co-authored The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship (ISBN 14196-3932-3).
The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship is available here. Read a compre