Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Port Gentil
F
Fertilisser Plant
E
ESIA Add
dendum -
H
HAZOP REVIEW
R
O
October 201
12
U
UNITED
K
KINGDOM &
IR
RELAND
Preparedfor:
G
Gabon Fertiliser Company
Pa
age1of15
Table of Content
1.0
Introduction
1.1
Background
1.2
Purpose of report
2.0
3.0
HAZOP Procedure
3.1
Preparation
3.2
Assumptions
3.3
Methodology
3.3.1 Nodes
4.0
HAZOP Review
4.1
4.2
4.3
Compression unit
10
4.4
11
4.5
12
4.6
13
4.7
14
5.0
Summary
15
Page2of15
1.0
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
The Gabon Fertilizer Company (GFC), a Joint Venture between Olam International
Limited, Singapore and the Republic of Gabon (RoG) is planning to construct a
grass root ammonia-urea fertilizer complex at Cap Lopez, near Port-Gentil in the
Republic of Gabon. Olam International Ltd, Singapore (http://www.olamonline.com)
is a leading global integrated food ingredients and industrial raw material supplier
with operations in 65 countries and employing over 18000 people worldwide.
A land area of 120 ha has been allocated for the project site within the industrial
park developed at Cap Lopez.
Steam generation (Waste heat of Gas Turbine and Auxiliary Boiler integrated
to process plant waste heat steam generation)
Flare stacks
1.2
Purpose of report
This report presents the HAZOP review carried out for the various units viz.
Compression unit
Steam generation and boiler feed water unit of the proposed fertilizer
project.
The Licensors {Haldor Topsoe A/S (HTAS), Denmark and Saipem SpA,
Italy}.
A Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP) for the Gabon Fertilizer Project was
held in the Technip (Paris) offices, La Dfense, France. The review was conducted
by a third-party Chairman from HazOptima and Bureau Veritas.
2.0
Unit 40 & 60 Utilities unit and Offsite unit but limited to:
3.0
HAZOP PROCEDURE
3.1
Preparation
Prior to the review, with the help of a process engineer, the chairman identified the
nodes and identified the operating modes.
The nodes size varied according to the complexity of the units considered. A
practical rule for changing nodes was at each major equipment / valve or wherever
a critical parameter is changing (flow, pressure, temperature, phase, etc). Each
node was subject of a dedicated analysis and a corresponding set of report
worksheets. The nodes were appropriately defined with clear design intent. They
were then recorded on the HAZOP worksheets.
The node description and full range of operating and design conditions were
described and documented on the worksheets.
The node description was presented to the HAZOP review team prior to its study so
that every team member was on the same understanding of it.
3.2
Assumptions
The HAZOP review was performed on the assumption that design, installation,
commissioning, operation, inspection, maintenance and emergency were at an
adequate level of quality, in line with Company and Project specifications.
3.3
Methodology
The HAZOP review process was divided into the following steps:
Select a node
Describe the nodes design intent and process conditions
Select the first/next parameter
Select the first/next deviation
Determine by brainstorming all the potential causes relevant to this deviation
and agree the credibility of each cause
Identify the potential consequences associated to each cause
Identify the safeguards in place or foreseen against each scenario identified
Propose actions when it appears necessary
Check that implementation of proposed action(s) will adequately solve the
issue
Apply the next deviation until they all have been considered &
Move onto the next node until the whole scope of review is covered
Page5of15
AZOP Chairman facillitated the review prrocess andd ensured that the
The HA
methodo
ology was fu
ully applied..
A schem
matic descrip
ption of thiss methodolo
ogy is prese
ented in the figure 1 below.
Figu
ure 1: HAZO
OP Review process schematic
1
3.3.1
Node
o the HAZ
n
was described
d
to
ZOP review team at tthe beginning of the
Each node
worksho
op so that every
e
team member ha
as the same
e understannding of it.
A syste
em of highlight colors on PIDs was
w
used to
t ensure tthat the lim
mits of the
nodes are fully un
nderstood by the team, and tha
at at the eend of the study the
coverag
ge (what is covered, e
excluded, duplicated
d
section)
s
waas clear. Th
he master
drawing
gs and the PIDs
P
were a
annexed to the report and
a archiveed with the study
s
3.3.2
2
Parame
eters and deviations
d
The HA
AZOP Team successsively selec
cted the co
ombination of Parame
eters and
compattible Guide Word app
plicable to the Node. The param
meters werre be the
followin
ng ones: Flow, Presssure, Temp
perature, Le
evel, Phasee, Compos
sition and
Operation. Typica
al Guide W
Words that was assoc
ciated to thhese param
meters to
charactterise the deviation are: No, Less, More, Reversee, Misdirec
cted, and
Differen
nt.
The typ
pical Parame
eter Guide--Word is rep
presented in
n the combiination table
e below.
This lisst of Param
meters and Guide Word is not limitative annd more pa
arameters,
guidewo
ords or com
mbinations may be us
sed if they are applicaable and make more
sense to the Team
m.
Pa
age6of15
SL.NO.
PARAMETER
1.
FLOW
GUIDEWORD
LESS / NO
MORE
REVERSE
MISDIRECTED
2.
PRESSURE
MORE
LESS
3.
TEMPERATURE
MORE
LESS
4.
LEVEL
HIGH
LOW
5.
PHASE
DIFFERENT
6.
COMPOSITION
DIFFERENT
7.
OPERATION
START-UP
MAINTENANCE
SHUT-DOWN
8.
SEQUENCE (*)
TOO SHORT
TOO LONG
9.
REACTION (*)
INCOMPLETE
RUN AWAY
Page7of15
4.0
HAZOP REVIEW
4.1
Company
Function
Attendees
1.
HazOptima, France
Chairman
2.
Process/scribe
3.
Gabon Fertilizer
Process
Company (GFC),
Gabon
4.
Process
(HTAS), Denmark
HAZOP recommendation:
Number of P&IDs studied
60
Number of Nodes
43
656
Instrumentation
Rotating Total
147
05
19
05
176
85
05
16
--
106
60
--
03
05
68
02
--
--
--
02
Page8of15
4.2
Function
1.
Chairman
Process/scribe
Process
Gabon
Specialist
Process
Mr. A. Ramasubramanian
Bureau Veritas,
Attendees
France
2.
Technip (TPF),
France
3.
Gabon Fertilizer
Company (GFC),
4.
HAZOP recommendation:
05
Number of Nodes
01
44
Recommendations
Process
Piping
Number of
recommendations
11
04
05
--
20
11
04
05
--
20
Page9of15
4.3
COMPRESSION UNIT:
HAZOP study carried out from 22.02.2012 to 19.03.2012
List of participants:
Sl.No.
Company
Function
Attendees
1.
HazOptima
Chairman
2.
Process/scribe
3.
Gabon Fertilizer
Process/
Company (GFC),
Instrument
Gabon
3. Mridul Bhargava
4. Mr. P.C. Jain
Specialist
1. Mr. S. Stalin
2. Mr. S. Shankaran
3. Mr. G.M. Koorse
4.
Process
(HTAS), Denmark
HAZOP Recommendation:
Number of P&IDs studied
18
Number of Nodes
13
Number of deviations
studied
256
Instrumentation
Rotating Total
Number of
recommendations
63
02
02
04
71
Action points on
61
02
02
04
69
Page10of15
EPC Contractor
4.4
Action points on
GFC
01
--
--
--
01
Action points on
GFC/EPC
Contractor
01
--
--
--
01
Company
Function
1.
HazOptima, France
Chairman
2.
Technip (TPF),
Process
Attendees
Mr. Jean-Roch Constans
1. Ms. Sonia Linares
France
3.
Process/scribe
4.
Gabon Fertilizer
Process
Company (GFC),
Gabon
5.
Licensor
HAZOP Recommendation:
Number of P&IDs studied
35
Number of Nodes
34
816
Instrumentation
Rotating Total
Number of
recommendations
106
17
31
08
162
Action points on
EPC Contractor
31
07
14
06
58
Action points on
GFC
--
--
--
01
01
Action points on
Licensor
77
07
19
--
103
Page11of15
4.5
Company
Function
Attendees
1.
HazOptima, France
Chairman
2.
Process/scribe
3.
Gabon Fertilizer
Proces
Company (GFC),
Gabon
Specialist
4.
Technip (TPF),
Process
France
5.
Licensor
HAZOP Recommendation:
Number of P&IDs studied
20
Number of Nodes
11
248
Instrumentation
Rotating Total
Number of
recommendations
55
02
07
01
65
Action points on
EPC Contractor
37
01
04
01
43
Action points on
GFC
01
--
02
--
03
Action points on
Licensor
16
01
01
--
18
Action points on
GFC/EPC
Contractor
01
--
--
--
01
Page12of15
4.6
Company
Function
Attendees
1.
HazOptima, France
Chairman
2.
Technip (TPF),
France
Process/scribe
3.
Gabon Fertilizer
Company (GFC),
Gabon
Process
Mr.Girish Prakash
Specialist
HAZOP Recommendation:
Number of P&IDs studied
09
Number of Nodes
02
56
Total
Number of
recommendations
17
01
10
28
Action points on
EPC Contractor
17
01
10
28
Page13of15
4.7
Company
Function
1.
Bureau Veritas,
France
Chairman
2.
Technip (TPF),
France
Process/scribe/
start-up
3.
Gabon Fertilizer
Company (GFC),
Gabon
Process
Specialist
Process
4.
Technip (TPIT),
Italy
Attendees
HAZOP Recommendation:
Number of P&IDs studied
11
Number of Nodes
10
148
Instrumentation
Total
Number of
recommendations
15
13
14
42
Action points on
EPC Contractor
15
13
14
42
The contents of HAZOP study & the recommendations are proprietary information
of Process Licensors.
Page14of15
5.0
SUMMARY:
The HAZOP review study covering the following units
Compression unit
Above review was conducted at the Technip (Paris) offices, La Dfense, France by
a third-party Chairman from HazOptima and Bureau Veritas, resulted in the
following.
Total deviations studied
: 2,224
------------------******-------------------
Page15of15