Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Red Curve: C=28500 bps & constant packet size -> The curve
starts settling after 56hr to 75hrs, finally at around 13.57 i.e
mean time average queue size
Blue Curve: C=28800 bps & exponential packet size -> The
curve starts settling after 56hr to 75hrs, finally at around 21.6
i.e mean time average queue size
Lets gauge the performance of both curves based on the
number of bits received by the sink in a fixed time. My taking
this approach because when packet size was exponential, we
cannot comment on the performance just
based on the number of packets received.
Eg- I am transferring a video to user by 2 methods. Method1:
variable packet size (similar to exponential in our case) &
Method2: fixed packet size. Suppose by method1 user received
3 packets of size 4k, 6k & 8k bits i.e total 18k bits. And, by
method2 user received 6 packets each of size 3k i.e total 18k
bits (considering same time interval). Thus, both methods are
equally good.
Graph: Comparing Time Average Bits received: Simulation for
75hrs
As we can see that the blue curve settles with mean traffic (bps)
of around 27500 bps while red curve settles with mean traffic
(bps) of around 27450.
Red Curve: Mean time average queue size for server2 is approx
5.6
Blue Curve: Mean time average queue size for server is approx
21.6
As we can infer from the graph that the time average queue size
of server2 is almost constant while time average queue size of
server varies & settles when it gets full. Until server is full, the
sources will push packets into it at the rate in which they
generate which is variable (starting of curve). But server2
always gets packets at constant rate from server which is
transmission from server to link + propagation.