THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM

AND REPORT FOR

THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMITTEE
PART ONE:
FLORIDA BAR

ACAP REFERENCE NO: 053977

COMPLAINANT :
Randall Townsend
P.O. Box 21
Odessa, FL 33556
941 350 2677

ALSO ON BEHALF OF MY CHILDREN WHO HAVE

BEEN VIOLATED SINCE AGE 10 &12:
Jason Townsend, son & Jennifer Townsend, daughter
3109 Abel Ave
Pace, FL 32571
850 994 5336

ATTORNEYS INVOLVED:
CHARLES H. SCRUGGS III
405 W. Azeele ST
Tampa, Fl 33606

Florida Bar #071911

Phone # 813 254-9031

STACY TURMEL
2124 W. Kennedy BLVD Suite A
Tampa, Fl 33060

Florida Bar #0009880

Phone # 813 251-0991

CHARLES W. DENNY IV
1750 Ringling Blvd.
Sarasota, FL 34236

Florida Bar #0488615

Phone #941 366-4680

A. JAMES ROLFES
1750 Ringling Blvd.
Sarasota, Fl 34236

Florida Bar # 373524

Phone #941 366-4680

STANFORD R. SOLOMON
W. Kennedy Blvd
Tampa, Fl 33060

Florida Bar #302147

Phone #813 225-1818

HEATHER GRAY
P.O. Box 2668
Riverview, FL 33568

Florida Bar #0076953

Phone #813 205-6663

DREW A. GARDNER
5666 Seminole Blvd, Suite Two
Seminole, Fl 33772

Phone #727 399-8300

David Gibbs III

Phone #727 399-8300

5666 Semimole BLVD, Suite Two

Seminole, FL 33772
JUDGES INVOLVED: (Hillsborough County)
RAUL C. PALOMINO Jr.
JAMES D. ARNOLD
WAYNE S. TIMMERMAN
FRANK GOMEZ
MARVA L. CRENSHAW
MONICA L. SIERRA
MANUEL MENENDEZ, JR.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
PART TWO:
LEGAL CASE FILES INVOLVED LISTING PERSONS AND THEIR ROLES!
CASE NO: 01-15813
RONALD BECK v. RANDY TOWNSEND
CASE NO: 01-15814
KAREN HARROD TOWNSEND v RANDY TOWNSEND
CASE NO: 02-03812
RANDALL TOWNSEND v RON BECK et al.
CASE NO: 02D04-997 Appeal
RANDALL TOWNSEND v. RON BECK et al.
CASE NO: 02-4974
KAREN HARROD TOWNSEND v RANDALL TOWNSEND
CASE NO: 02D03-5679 Appeal
RANDALL TOWNSEND v. KAREN HARROD TOWNSEND
CASE NO: 05-0911
RANDALL TOWNSEND v CHARLES SCRUGGS, Esquire
CASE NO: 05-09605
RANDALL TOWNSEND v KAREN HARROD TOWNSEND
PLEASE INCORPORATE ALL THE DOCUMENTS FILED IN EACH OF THE
ABOVE CASES AS EVIDENCE IN EACH POINT COMPLAINED OF BELOW
HEREIN.

TRANSCRIPTS OF MOST HEARINGS ARE AVAILABLE AS ADDITIONAL

PROOFS TO THIS REPORT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS NOT YET IN
EVIDENCE MAY ALSO PROVE THESE POINTS NECESSARY FOR YOUR
REVIEW!

OPENING STATEMENT:
IT IS NECESSARY THAT THE FLORIDA BAR AND JUDICIAL
QUALIFICATIONS COMMITTEE ACT QUICKLY TO STOP THE ABUSE AND
CRIMINAL ACTS HEREIN OR ELSE AS THESE MATTERS PUSH THROUGH
THE COURTS OTHER JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS WILL BE REQUIRED TO
BE DISBARRED!
I WILL BE ALERT TO YOUR IMMEDIATE ACTIONS AND WILL USE ALL
LEGAL MEANS NECESSARY TO STOP THE CRIMES AS STATED HEREIN!
MAJOR SUMMARY POINT: ATTORNEY GARDNER AND THEN DENNY HAS
FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT HIS CLIENTS HAVE VIIOLATED THE FLORIDA
STATUES AND LIED TO HIM AND TO JUDGE PALOMINO AND THEN HE
CONTINUES TO PRESENT THOSE LIES TO THE COURT WILLINGLY NOT AS A
DEFENSE ATTORNEY PRESENTING WHAT MAY BE A QUESTION FOR THE
COURT OR JURY, BUT ATTORNEY DENNY FULLY KNOWS HE IS LYING TO
THE COURT WITH NO ROOM FOR DOUBT AND HOW THIS CONTINUES HIS
CRIMES AND THE CRIMES OF HIS CLIENTS AND INTENT TO EVADE
PROSECUTION AND HIM BEING PROVED TO INTENTIONALLY LIE TO COVER
UP FOR THE FRAUDS HIS CLIENTS FIRST TOLD OTHERS AND HIM AND TO
THE COURTS! ATTORNEY FORMER JUDGE SCRUGGS ALSO CONSPIRES!
SCRUGGS HAS KNOWN SINCE 2000, OF FRAUDS BY BECK, MY FORMER
WIFE, OTHER CHURCH LEADERS, AND ATTORNEYS AND HE LIED TO HIS
CLIENT.
DENNY ALSO KNOWING AND CONSPIRING NOW SINCE:
(1) READING THE ORIGINAL LAWSUIT FILED APRIL 2002, AND
(2) READING THE MOTION FILED WITH THE COURT ON DECEMBER 18, 2002,
AND STATEMENTS IN THE TRANSCRIPTS OF HIS LECTURES AND
(3) MEETING WITH PLAINTIFF AT THE FIRST HEARING BEFORE JUDGE
ARNOLD BEFORE THE HEARING ON JANUARY 21, 2003,
HAS PRACTICED TO EVADE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION FOR HIMSELF AND
HIS CLIENTS DUE TO HIS FRAUD ON THE COURT AND BLOCKING OF FILES.
AND THEN IN THE HEARINGS MISDIRECT THE COURTS AND CONFUSE THE
ISSUES BEFORE THE COURTS STARTING IN JANUARY 21, 2003, as in the
transcript of said hearing Judge Arnold said: ON PAGE 17- Also on defamation, libel,
and slander, you have to set forth, with some specificity, what the libel is, what the
slander is. If its written documents, what the written documents are, attach them to the
complaint as an exhibit.
ON PAGE 18- THE COURT-And then you file an action for injunctive relief where you
did the same thingreallege everything. And you prayed that the Court order support of
all discovery of documents.

WHAT DENNY IS TRYING TO PROTECT IS MY PRO SE ACTS OF

DISCOVERY OF:
(1) THE FINANCIAL RECORDS NOT GIVEN TO ME PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 8,
1999 AS I HAD REQUESTED AS AN INVESTIGATOR CHURCH MEMBER AND
(2) THE WRITTEN PAGES AFTER SEPTEMBER 8, 1999, THAT HIS CLIENTS
HAVE MADE AND PUT IN THE CHURCH MINUTES FROM BUSINESS
MEETINGS OR AT OTHER TIMES TO OUTRAGE NAVE MEMBERS TO THE
MONEY FRAUDS AND NOT PROTECTED RELIGIOUS SERVICES MEETINGS
AND THESE DOCUMENTS WILL SUPPORT TORT CLAIMS BY THIS PLAINTIFF
THAT DO NOT EVEN COME CLOSE TO THE VERY LIMITED EXAMPLES OF
THE KOND CASE OR ANY OTHER CASE DENNY CAN FIND!
MAJOR POINT!!!!!!!!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
THE KOND CASE:
WAS NOT A CASE TO SHOW REDRESS FROM A
COURT ACTION BY THE CHURCH AGAINST A PERSON BUT AS IN THIS CASE
I AM REDRESSING A COURT ACTION BY THE PASTOR, MY FORMER WIFE,
AND THE CHURCH MEMBERS THAT WERE EVEN IN THE COURT READY TO
TESTIFY AS CHURCH MEMBERS AND THE CHURCH TRUSTEE ALSO AS THE
SHERIFF DEPUTY WHO WITH HIS TESTIMONY BEFORE JUDGE PALOMINO
WAS THERE TO TESTIFY AND THE TESTIMONY REPORTED TO THIS
PLAINTIFF FROM THE OWN WORDS OF THIS DEPUTY WERE GOING TO BE
FALSE AND FRAUDULENT AND PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY TO JUDGE
PALOMINO.
MY CASE AS ALLOWED TO STAND IS A MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CASE TO
REDRESS THE ORIGINAL ATTEMPT OF THE FRAUDULENT INJUNCTION
BECK AND THE CHURCH MEMBERS TRIED TO GAIN BY PERJURY AND
FRAUD AND TORT ACTIONS AND SLANDER AND LIBEL!
Per the FLORIDA SUPREME COURT as REDRESS FOR MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION TO PROVE MALICE AND PROVE OUTRAGEOUS AND
ODIOUS CONDUCT NOTE THE FOLLOWING:
Matthew Bender & Co. Inc. (Rel.16-1/97 Pub. 565) FLORIDA TORTS Section on
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION Section 22.
This Publication quotes the use of Pellegrini v. Winter 476 So2d 1363 (Fla. 5th DCA
1985) and other cases and also states that same publication in the section for:
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS.
THE COURT OF JUDGE CRENSHAW HAS NOT ALLOWED THIS PLAINTIFF
TO GET DISCOVERY OF THESE PAPERS REQUESTED BY PLAINTIFF
MOTION TO COMPEL, ETC. FILED ON DECEMBER 18, 2002, NOR SINCE THE
JANUARY 21, 2003, HEARING ACKNOWLEDGED BY JUDGE ARNOLD!
POINT ONE-----These actions by Judge Crenshaw have ignored many pleas of this
Plaintiff and as told the judge in hearings that this Plaintiff while he does not give up his
right to pursue individual new actions against these persons which may fall outside of the
alleged protected utterances as of KOND it is believed that these actions by this church as
an AT LARGE and as select individuals will prove the OUTRAGEOUS AND
ODIOUS that go way beyond the very frail argument of KOND and allow this

DEFENDANT TURNED PLAINTIFF to show just cause of action that goes to the
extreme action much more damaging than KOND that would allow TORT LAWSUITS
FOR LIBEL AND SLANDER AND PROOF OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS and PAIN
and MENTAL ABUSE AND TRAMA on me and my kids!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
POINT TWO-----KOND was not a case of REDRESS AS DEFENSE OF THE
ACTION THAT THE CHURCH CAME BEFORE THE COURT OF THEIR OWN
FREE WILL AND SUED KOND AS MY CASE IS REQUIRING DISCOVERY OF
SPECIFIC AS STATED DOCUMENTS.
POINT THREE---AFTER NOW SPEAKING WITH A CIVIL RIGHTS
ATTORNEY IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE IT IS CLEAR THAT
THE ACTS BY DENNY AND JUDGE CRENSHAW EVEN TRYING TO LET
THE CHURCH AT LARGE MEMBERS AND THE CHURCH AS A
CORPORATION HIDE BEHIND THESE CASES OF KOND AND MALICKI, IT
IS CLEAR ABUSE OF MY CIVIL RIGHTS INTENTIONALLY BY THEM NOT
THAT MY COMPLAINT WAS NOT DETAILED FOR THE COURT OR THAT
THEY DID NOT ALLOW RECOVERY BUT THIS ATTORNEY AND JUDGE
DOING THIS IS A STALLING TACTIC AND JUST ALLOWING THE ABUSE
TO CONTINUE AGAINST ME AS THE ATTORNEYS TELL THE PASTOR
AND THE CHURCH THINKS THEY CAN NEVER BE SUED FOR THEIR
HATE CRIMES THEY CONTINUE TO PRACTICE FROM 1996 TILL TODAY
AS THE INJUNCTION IS A CONTINUING DAMAGE OF THE HATE CRIME
ACTS STARTED IN 1996 BY RON BECK WHEN HE WAS ABOUT TO BE
EXPOSED FOR HIS INTENTIONAL ACTS OF FRAUDS! TIM JEFFERS
CONTINUED THESE ACTS OF FRAUDS AND NOT REPORTING THE
MONEYS AND THEN VIOLATED HIS SHERIFF UNIFORM AND STARTED
ADDITIONAL ACTS OF FRAUD AGAINST THIS PLAINTIFF!
MY REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONS ARE FOR MY DEFENSE FROM MY
DAMAGES FROM THEIR FILING THEIR FREE WILL LAWSUIT AGAINST
ME AND TO PROVE TO JUDGE CRENSHAW THAT IT WAS NOT JUST
BECK IN THAT COURTROOM BUT IT WAS THE ENTIRE CHURCH WITH
HIM AS THEIR PASTOR THERE TO MURDER MY REPUTATION SO THAT
THEIR VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA STATUES CANNOT BE PROSECUTED
BY THE STATE AS CRIMINAL FRAUDS AND ALSO ALLOWING ME TO
SHOW THE EXTENT OF THE NECESSARY PROOFS FOR OUTRAGEOUS
AND ODIOUS EXTREME CONDUCT DONE BY THEM AGAINST ME AND
MY FAMILY AND KIDS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY! I HAVE SUFFERED THEIR
HATE CRIMES NOW FOR MANY YEARS DUE TO THE FRAUD OF
ATTORNEY GARDNER, GIBBS AND DENNY AND THEIR LAW FIRMS!
ALSO FOR MR. DENNY WHEN THE RULING OF JUDGE CRENSHAW WAS
APPEALED AS TO RELEASING SEVERAL DEFENDANTS FROM THE
LAWSUIT, MR. DENNY AND HIS FRIM VIA OTHER ATTORNEYS THEN
PRESENTED FRAUD TO THE APPEALS COURT AND THEIR RULING WAS
THE CASE WAS UNTIMELY!
EVEN THOUGH THE REASON WAS CLEAR THAT WITH MOVING THE
COURTHOUSE IN TAMPA THE CLERK ADVISED THEY WERE BEHIND ON

THEIR FILING MY FEBRUARY 3, 2004, papers. THE CLERK ADVISED THIS

PLAINTIFF ON FEBRUARY 10, 2004, THAT THE FILE HAD NOT BEEN
RECEIVED SO PLAINTIFF GAVE THE CLERK A NEW COPY SINCE THE
MAIL DUE TO THE MOVING HAD NOT BEEN PROCESSED!
THE APPEALS COURT THEN DID NOT HONOR THE UNINTENTIONAL
ERROR BY THE FILING CLERK AND DENIED THE APPEAL AS BEING
UNTIMELY!
HERE AGAIN WE HAVE A GAME OF TRICKERY BY ATTORNEYS AND
JUDGES AS THAT THIS PLAINTIFF DID NOT DO ERRORS AS THE
ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES WANT TO MISREPRESENT PURE FACTS AND
WITH BIAS ALWAYS TREAT THIS PLAINTIFF AS AN INCOMPETENT
LITIGANT PRO SE!
MAJOR POINT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT IS ALSO EVER MORE CLEAR NOW THAT THE PREJUDICE OF THE
COURT AND INTENTIONAL ABUSE BY THE ATTORNEYS AND THE
JUDGES TO NOT ALLOW THIS PLAINTIFF TO DEFEND HIMSELF
AGAINST NOW HATE CRIMES THAT STARTED BY A SENIOR PASTOR
WHO ABUSED HIS CHURCH OPENLY IN A CORPORATION BUSINESS
MEETING NOT A RELIGIOUS CEREMONY OR MEETING BUT IN THE
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES AS SHOWN ON APRIL 28, 1996 AND OTHER
MEETING MINUTES OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS EVEN THROUGH THE
DEMAND MADE IN SEPTEMBER 1999 OF SHOW ME THE MONEY, NO
MORE EXCUSES (which discovery being blocked by Gardner then Denny will
show Beck still frauds and lies) AND THEN LIED TO HIS CHURCH MEMBERS
AND THIS INVESTIGATOR/PLAINTIFF AND THEN THESE CHURCH
MEMBERS IN THE LATE 1990s AND TO THIS DAY CONTINUES HATE
CRIMES AND ABUSE ON THIS INVESTIGATOR/PLAINTIFF WHEN
PLAINTIFF WAS ASKED TO FIND THE MONEY? AND THEN ABUSE AND
DISTROY HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH HIS CHILDREN DUE TO THE
CRIMINAL ACTS OF A HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPUTY JOE
HOWLETT ALSO AS A TRUSTEE OF THE NOT FOR PROFIT
CORPORATION BEING DISLOYAL TO HIS SHERIFF UNIFORM AND AND A
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEMBER TIM JEFFERS ALSO AS A PINELLAS
COUNTY SHERIFF DEPUTY ALSO VIOLATING THE OATH OF HIS
UNIFORM JOINED WITH THE PASTOR ON SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 AND
PUBLICLY STARTED THE ALLEGATIONS THAT THIS PLAINTIFF HAD A
STRESS RELATED BREAKDOWN AND WAS DANGEROUS WHILE IN
CONSPIRACY THIS ALLEGED PASTOR AND HIS CO CONSPIRATORS
HOWLETT AND JEFFERS TIRED TO QUIETLY EXPOSE PARTS OF THE
HIDDEN MONEY WHILE PLAINTIFF WAS BEING BANNED FROM THE
PROPERTY BY DEPUTY HOWLETT USING HIS SHERIFF DEPARTMENTS
CAR TO OPENLY PRESENT ALTERCATIONS THAT PLAINTIFF WAS
ALLEGEDLY SHOWING ACTS OF STALKING AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
THAT EVEN ATTORNEY DENNY USED TO THE COURT OF JUDGES IN
TOTAL VIOLATON OF THE UNDER OATH TESTIMONY OF BECK TO

JUDGE PALOMINO AND THEN THESE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES

WILLING AT ANY MOMENT TO IGNORE THAT THIS PLAINTIFF HAS NOT
VIOLATED ANY LAW REQUIRING JUDGE PALOMINO TO ORDER ANY
INJUNCTION BUT THEN LYING BY THESE SAME DEFENDANTS AND
THEN LYING BY ATTORNEYS AND LYING BY JUDGES ALL HAVE
CONTINUED TO PRACTICE ABUSE AND HATE CRIMES AGAINST THIS
PLAINTIFF AND THEN SO THESE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS CAN COVER
UP THEIR OWN LYING AND FRAUD AND MALPRACTICE PLACE ON THIS
PLAINTIFF AN INJUNCTION THAT IS SO LOOSELY WRITTEN FOR THE
BENEFIT OF THE EXTORTED AND ESSTRANGED FORMER WIFE AND
THESE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES THAT HAVE CONSPIRED WITH HER
THAT THIS PLAINTIFF FATHER IS SCARED TO DEATH THAT AGAIN
BASED ON THE INSAIN ACTS OF THE FORMER WIFE AND HER NEW
CRIMINAL FRIENDS ALLEGED PASTORS AND SHERIFF DEPUTIES AND
THESE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS THAT IF SHE WANTS TO CREATE
ANOTHER LIE ALLEGEDING THE FATHER ABUSED THIS DAUGHTER OR
SON OR HER THAT THESE EVIL JUDGES WILL SEND PLAINTIFF TO JAIL
FOR NO REASON AGAIN BUT BECAUSE THEY HAVE OVEREXERCISED
THEIR ALLEGED RIGHT TO BE CRIMINAL BUT WEAR ROBES! NO ONE
THINKS A CHURCH SHOULD BE THIS FULL OF HATE CRIMES TO HURT
AN INNOCENT MAN SAYING SHOW ME THE MONEY AND NO ONE
EXPECTS A JUDGE TO BE SO FULL OF HATE TO HURT AN INNOCENT
MAN BUT THESE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES!
THESE ACTS BY PASTORS, SHERIFF DEPUTIES, GARDNER, GIBBS,
DENNY, SCRUGGS, TURMEL, SOLOMON, TIMMERMAN, CRENSHAW,
GOMEZ, SIERRA AND THE APPEALS COURT IGNORING THE FILING
DEADLINE WAS MET AND THEN ALLOWING HEATHER GRAY TO ABUSE
HER CLIENT AND HAVE THE DIVORCE APPEAL DISMISSED SO THE
APPEALS COURT CAN SIDE STEP THIS ABUSE AND THEN FOR JUDGE
SIERRA AND JUDGE CRENSHAW TO CONTINUE TO ROADBLOCK THIS
PLAINTIFF WHILE THIS INJUNCTION AND THE ALLEGED CHURCH
STILL PRACTICES THEIR HATE CRIMES IN THE COURTS AND ON
PUBLIC STREETS MEANS ALL OF THESE PEOPLE SHOULD BE
DISBARRED AND PUT IN JAIL! THIS IS SUPPOSE TO BE A CIVIL LEGAL
SYSTEM NOT RUN BY JUDGES WHO USE FRAUD TO KEEP THEMSELVES
FROM BEING PROVED TO HAVE DONE MALPRACTICE AND FRAUD!
THE FACTS OF THIS CASE PROVES THE ORGANIZED CRIME OF THESE
DEFENDANTS, ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES IN AN ALLEGED CIVIL LEGAL
SYSTEM.
FROM THE LIES STATED BY THE PASTOR IN OPEN COURT BEFORE JUDGE
PALOMINO I MUST AS JUDGE CRENSHAW AND JUDGE ARNOLD STATE
PROVE THE CHURCH SUPPORTED BECK IN THE COURT OF PALOMINO THAT
DAY IN 2001!
I SEEK TO PROVE UNDER REDRESS FROM THEIR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
THAT THE MALICE AND TORT ACTIONS WERE SHOWING THE KNOWLEDGE
AND THE STILL TORT ILL WILL THAT THIS PASTOR AND THEN THESE

CHURCH MEMBERS AND AT LARGE OTHER MEMBERS INTENDED TO

IGNORING THE ACTIONS THAT THIS PLAINTIFF WAS ASKED BY THESE
SAME PERSONS TO DO FOR THEM TO FIND THE HIDDEN MONEY THAT
BEFORE THIS PLAINTIFF WAS ALLOWED TO PRESENT HIS FINDINGS TO THE
MEMBERS AT LARGE THAT THEN THIS PASTOR AND THE TRUSTEE AND
THE FINANCE COMMITTEE WITH THE PASTORS STAFF AND PERSONAL
FAMILY DID THEN START NEW FRAUDS, TORT ACTIONS, AGAINST
PLAINTIFFS WIFE AND KIDS AND THEN THESE SAME CHURCH MEMBERS
BEFORE PLAINTIFF WAS EVER ABLE TO GIVE HIS FULL PROOFS OF THE
NOW DISCOVERED OVER $300,000.00 that was not per Florida Statues being
reported as officers of a not for profit corporation and the corporation books by the
statement presented even to the courts from the words of the SCHOOL PASTOR
HERMAN MEISTER THAT THE CHURCH/SCHOOL RECORDS WERE NOT
BEING DONE LEGALLY PROVING MONEY WAS MISREPRESENTED!
***SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTS WERE PUT ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL
COMPLAINT FILED IN APRIL 2002 TO PUT THE ATTORNEYS AND
COURTS ON NOTICE OF THE CRIMINAL FRAUDS BEING DONE BY THE
PASTOR PER HIS JULY 26, 2001, LETTER!
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS WERE PUT IN THE EXHIBITS TO THE COURT IN
THE TOWNSEND v BECK CASE ON DECEMBER 18, 2002, AND MAILED TO
ATTORNEYS FOR BECK AND THE CHURCH, DENNY, SHOWING THE
CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF BECK AND SELECT CHURCH MEMBERS! THESE
DOCUMENTS WERE ALSO REVIEWED WITH ATTORNEY SCRUGGS IN 2000
AND AGAIN IN NOVEMBER 2001, FOR THE TRIAL BEFORE JUDGE
PALOMINO!
SCRUGGS HAD WRITTEN AND VERBAL AND VISUAL PROOFS HIS CLIENT
WAS A VICTIM OF PASTORS AND SHERIFF DEPUTY AND OTHER CHURCH
MEMBERS FULL ABUSE BECAUSE HOWLETT MEISTER AND THE
ESTRANGED WIFE EVEN CAME TO THE COURT OF JUDGE PALOMINO TO
GIVE FALSE TESTIMONY AND SCRUGGS SAT IN COURT AND HEARD BECK
AND KAREN LIE AND HE DID NOTHING TO PROTECT HIS CLIENT FROM
FRAUD!
EVERY ACT BY SCRUGGS AND DENNY FROM THAT POINT SHOWS HE HAD
SUFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE AND IN EVEN PREVIOUS MEETINGS BETWEEN
THIS PLAINTIFF AND SCRUGGS AND DENNY BEEN GIVEN SUFFICIENT
VERBAL AND WRITTEN PROOF THAT HIS ACTIONS WERE HELPING THE
WIFE, PASTORS, AND SHERIFF DEPUTIES PRACTICE CRIMINAL ACTS THEY
STARTED AGAINST AN INNOCENT PLAINTIFF JUST SAYING SHOW ME THE
MONEY I WAS TOLD TO DO AS A LEADER MEMBER IN THE CORPORATION!

PART THREE:
REASONS FOR COMPLAINT
IT IS TIME TO BLOW THE WHISTLE AND PROVE WHO HAS VIOLATED
THE FLORIDA STATUES AND WHO HAS VIOLATED THE FLORIDA RULES
OF COURT AND IGNORED RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT SO THE
FRAUD AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE CAN BE STOPPED!

NOW THE EVIDENCE IS TOGETHER ENOUGH THAT PEOPLE WILL

KNOW ENOUGH TO BELIEVE ME NOW!
I HAVE READ OVER 50 BOOKS AND COUNSELED WITH MANY
PROFESSIONALS AND EVEN PUBLISHED AUTHORS AND CAN PROVE
THESE ALLEGATIONS AS STATED HEREIN ARE TRUE.
EXPERTS CONFIRM THE FORMER WIFE KAREN HARROD TOWNSEND
AND RON BECK, SENIOR PASTOR AT THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF
CITRUS PARK, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA, ARE VERY SICK
MENTALLY AND EMOTIONALLY AND HAVE CAUSED THESE ACTIONS
HEREIN AS RETALIATION AGAINST ME AND CAUSED DAMAGE TO MY
KIDS FOR ME POINTING OUT THEIR CRIMINAL ACTS AND CONSPIRACY!
THE BASIC BOTTOM PROBLEM OF THIS CASE IS WHEN I WAS ASKED BY
CHURCH MEMBERS TO HELP FIND THE MONEY TO DATE OVER
$300,000.00 COLLECTIVELY, I TRIED TO DO MY DUTY TO STOP A PASTOR
FROM LYING TO MY CHURCH MEMBERS, WHICH LED TO HIM LYING
TO AND EXTORTING MY WIFE AND KIDS AND STEALING FROM MY KIDS
AND CHURCH KIDS IN MY CHARGE PER MY CONTRACT BY-LAW
DUTIES!
WHEN I CONFRONTED RON BECK DURING JULY SEPTEMBER 1999:
WITH SHOW ME THE MONEY AS THE LONG RANGE PLANNING
COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN, THAT I HAD A DUTY TO KNOW FOR
PLANNING THE PROJECT OF CHURCH/SCHOOL EXPANSION HOW
MUCH MONEY WAS IN THESE ACCOUNTS AND HOW MUCH MONEY
WAS PER THE CHURCH AND SCHOOL BUDGET ALLOCATED EVERY
MONTH AND I LATER RAN THE COSTS ON WHAT THE PASTOR WAS
SAYING WE WERE GOING TO BUILD AND THE NUMBERS WERE THAT
IT WAS A $10 MILLION DOLLAR PROJECT AND ABOUT $3 MILLION
COULD BE RAISED DURING THE TIME PERIOD THESE PASTORS
WERE SAYING THE PROJECT WOULD BE DONE! (NOTE TODAY THEY
STILL DONT USE THE PROPERTY AS PLANNED AND THIS PROJECT
WAS TO BE DONE BY 2003 PER HIS FIVE YEAR PLAN)
STOP THE LYING TO ME AND CHURCH MEMBERS ABOUT HIDDEN
OLD YEARS MONEY AND
WITH HIS ACT(S) OF NOT REPORTING SECRET MONEY FROM OLD
YEARS THAT THIS IS A SERIOUS CRIME AND A FRAUD TO THE
MEMBERS PER THE BY-LAWS
WITH THE ACT OF WILLIAM BROWN NOT REPORTING THE JUST
DISCOVERED IN SEPTEMBER 1999, NEW SECRET ACCOUNT HE HAD
SET UP FOR THE YOUTH DEPARTMENT HE WAS AGAIN AFTER BEING
WARNED VIOLATING THE BY-LAWS AND THE FLORIDA STATUES

THAT BROWN SAID EACH PASTOR HAS THEIR OWN SECRET

ACCOUNTS AND I HAVE WARNED BROWN BEFORE THAT IS NOT
ALLOWED PER THE BY-LAWS AND FRAUD
THAT NOT REPORTING THESE SECRET MONEY ACCOUNTS TO THE
FINANCE COMMITTEE AS BROWN STATED THEY DID NOT KNOW,
WAS CAUSING ALL OF THEM EVERY QUARTER TO BE PRODUCING
FALSE RECORDS TO THE CHURCH BODY AND THIS IS A SERIOUS
CRIME----And one of the issues that caused the Former Pastor of
Administration to leave was also lying and not reporting money.
STOP LYING TO THE CHURCH BODY ABOUT THE REPORTS HE
FABRICATED FROM THE SPECIAL EXPERTS HE HIRED TO GIVE THE
CHURCH A GROWTH PLAN
THAT HIS DIRECTING DENNIS WILLIAMS THE MUSIC DIRECTOR TO
TAKE THE MICROPHONE FROM THE AWANA CHILDRENS KIDS
PROGRAM THAT I AS THE AWANA COMMANDER FOR THAT IT WAS
STEALING FROM KIDS ITEMS BOUGHT WITH DESIGNATED FUNDS
AND HE CANNOT JUST CALL IT A MISTAKE AND BLAME DENNIS
WILLIAMS FOR IT BECAUSE HE DIRECTED THE STEALING FROM
THE CHURCH KIDS I TOLD HIM THAT JUST PROVED HOW DIRTY
AND SNEAKY HE WOULD LIE TO COVER UP FOR HIS STEALING.
THAT HE PROMISED THAT MANY THINGS WOULD BE CORRECTED
FOR THE AWANA MEETING THAT PAST TWO WEDNESDAY NIGHTS
THAT WAS NOT DONE
THAT HE HAD BETTER STOP LYING ABOUT SOMETHING HE DOES
NOT KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT AND HAD CAUSED GREAT DAMAGE
IN MY MARRIAGE BY TELLING MY WIFE HIS ALLEGED POSITIONS
ON MY PERSONAL BUSINESS LAWSUITS AGAINST MY FORMER
ATTORNEYS IN ORLANDO
THAT WE HAD TO DEAL WITH WILLIAM BROWN LYING TO MY SON
AND OTHER YOUTH AND ABOUT SEVERAL OTHER MATTERS WITH
WILLIAM BROWN AS VIOLATING MY KIDS IN MY CHARGE HAD
GONE TOO FAR
THAT THE REMODELING PLAN THAT DENNIS WILLIAMS WANTED
TO DO WITH THE FELLOWSHIP HALL WAS A DISASTER
THAT HE HAD LIED TO MY PARENTS WHEN THEY CAME TO SEE HIM
ABOUT MARRIAGE COUNSELING OF KAREN AND MYSELF
THAT HE HAD BETTER COME CLEAN AND ANSWER FOR HIS
VIOLATIONS OF THE BY-LAWS AND ANSWER THEN TO ME AS PER
MY POSITION ON THE NOMINATION COMMITTEE FIRST AND THEN
TO OTHERS AS I PERSUED THESE VIOLATIONS PER MY DUTIES
OR HE MAY BE ASKED TO RESIGN WHEN THIS IS ALL MADE PUBLIC
IN A BUSINESS MEETING ONCE IT COMES OUT OF THE NOMINATION
COMMITTEE TO BE PRESENTED TO THE ENTIRE CHURCH (OR
MAYBE HIS STAFF RESIGN WITH HIM)
HE THEN STARTED HIS RETALIATIONS EVEN MORE AND LIED MORE
TO THE GROUP OF MEN HE BROUGHT TO THE SEPTEMBER 8, 1999,

10

MEETING WHERE I TOLD HIM IF HE TAKES THESE KEYS THEN YOU

DONT WANT THE TRUTH AND HE TOOK AWAY MY KEYS TO THE
PROPERTY AND FIRED ME FROM ALL MY DUTIES SO HE COULD
WORK OUT MORE OF THE COVERUP OF HIS CRIMES
AND HE THEN WENT IMMEDIATELY RIGHT FROM THAT EARLY
MORNING MEETING AND PULLED MY WIFE OUT OF TEACHING IN
HER SCHOOL ROOM AND LIED TO MY WIFE, KIDS AND OTHERS AND
TO A SHERIFF DEPUTY, (JOE HOWLETT) ALSO AS A NAVE TRUSTEE
OF THE CHURCH AND USED HIS PRIVATE NAVE DEPUTY WHO AT
FIRST WAS NAVE BUT AFTER BEING INFORMED TO MY CHARGES
AGAINST THE PASTORS, DEPUTY HOWLETT REALIZING HE HAD
VIOLATED HIS JOB AS TRUSTEE AND THEN DUTY AS A SHERIFF
DEPUTY DUE TO THE ENTRAPMENT LIES OF THE PASTORS, HE STILL
CHOSE TO PUNISH ME TO KEEP THINGS QUIET SO HE AND THE
PASTORS DID NOT GET FIRED AND JAIL TIME.
AND HE ALSO USED PINELLAS DEPUTY TIM JEFFERS AS HIS ROLE
WAS ON THE FINANCE COMMITTEE TO FRAUD THAT THE BOOKS
HAD NOT BEEN DOCTORED AND NO MONEY WAS MISSING BUT THEN
THE CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS ACCOUNTS SHOWED UP
AND HIS LIES INCLUDED TELLING EVERY ONE I HAD A STRESS
RELATED BREAKDOWN AND WAS ALLEGEDLY DANGEROUS
AND THAT IT WAS A FRAUD FOR HIM TO SAY THAT DUE TO HIS
PRIVATE KNOWLEDGE OF THINGS FROM HIS PASTORAL
COUNSELING HE COULD NOT SAY EVERYTHING HE KNEW!

WHAT KIND OF A PERSON CALLING HIMSELF A PASTOR DOES THESE

CRIMES? LOOK AT HOW MUCH HATE AND ADDITIONAL CRIME HE
HAS CAUSED!
HE HAS A LOT TO HIDE BECAUSE WHAT KIND OF PASTOR WOULD FIRE
AND ABUSE AND HARASS A GUY WHO DEVOTED AS A VOLUNTEER
OVER 10 HOURS A WEEK FOR OVER 7 YEARS?
SO I ASK WHY ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES PROTECT THESE CRIMINAL
ACTIONS OF AN ALLEGED PASTOR RUNNING A CULT LIKE PROGRAM
AND PUNISH ME FOR HIM LYING AND MAKE RON BECKS CRIMES GET
EVEN WORSE FOR NOW 10 YEARS HE STARTED IN 1995.
EVEN CATHOLIC PRIESTS VIOLATING THE LAW ONLY ONCE AGAINST
ONE YOUNG PERSON DID NOT GET EVEN THESE PROTECTIONS
ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES HAVE GIVEN TO RON BECK FOR HIS
MULTIPLE YEARS GREED OF POWER AND CONTROL OF MONEY AND
THEN OF HIDING MONEY, LYING TO THE MEMBERS AND LAWYERS AND
JUDGES AND OTHER CRIMES?
SOMEONE TELL ME HOW THE CRIMES BECK HAS DONE NOW FOR
YEARS TO ABUSE AND STEAL AND LIE TO GET AN INJUNCTION ON ME

11

SO MAYBE THE STATUE OF LIMITATIONS CAN EXPIRE AND NO ONE PUT

TOGETHER ALL THE VILE ACTS THIS ALLEGED PASTOR HAS DONE
AND KILLED MY FAMILY IS DIFFERENT THAT THE THREE KILLERS
LAST YEAR OF CARLI, SARA, AND JESSICA IN THIS STATE?
EVERY ATTORNEY LISTED ABOVE AND SELECT JUDGES,
(Listed in order of involvement--Raul C. Palomino Jr., Wayne S. Timmerman,
Marva Crenshaw, Frank A. Gomez, Monica L. Sierra and Chief Judge Menendez)
HAVE BEEN CAUGHT UP BY THE LIES OF AN ALLEGED PASTOR AND
HAVE ALLLOWED AND SOME KNOWINGLY CONTRIBUTED TO THE
PERPERTRATION OF A CONTINUING FRAUD SINCE 1996, RON BECK
STARTED AGAINST ME.
I HAVE DOCUMENTS AND EVIDENCE THAT CAN CONNECT EVERY POINT!
THE MOST MAJOR POINT OF THIS ENTIRE MATTER IS:
*****PER R.O.C.P 4-3.4(a) ALL ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES, DEFENDANTS
AND AN ALLEGED DOCTOR DR. LYNN, AND ALLEGED SHERIFFS IN
A SHERIFFS DEPARTMENTS THAT ARE SUPPOSE TO PROTECT ALL
PERSONS RIGHTS NO HARASS INNOCENT PEOPLE SO THEIR ACTS ARE
NOT UNCOVERED HAVE:
(a) UNLAWFULLY OBSTRUCTED ANOTHERS PARTYS ACCESS TO
EVIDENCE. MY DAUGHTER AND SON IS EVIDENCE OF THE ABUSE THIS
PRO SE FATHER IS TRYING TO REPORT, STOP AND REPAIR NOW SINCE
1996.
(b) BY NOT HELPING ME THEN GET THE CHURCH RECORDS AND ALL
THE CRIMES OF RON BECK AND OTHERS FULLY EXPOSED
(c) WERE WILLING TO TESTIFY EVEN UNDER OATH TO WORK THEIR
COVERUP OF CRIMES AND CONTINUED EXTORTION!
WHO GAVE THIS ALLEGED PASTOR THE RIGHT TO TAKE AWAY MY
CIVIL RIGHT TO SEE AND RAISE MY OWN SON AND DAUGHTER
CLAIMING I AM A CRIMINAL WHEN HE FOR 10 YEARS NOW CANNOT
SHOW EVIDENCE OF HIS POSITION AND WHEN UNDER OATH IN
NOVEMBER 2001, SAID NO VIOLENCE WAS DONE?
HE IS A HERETIC TO ALL HE SAYS HE STANDS FOR --BUT ACTUALLY IS THE WORST TYPE OF CRIMINAL!
EITHER HE AND HIS COHORTS ARE CONVICTED AND PUT IN JAIL OR
YOU ARE AS GUILTY AS HE IS!

BACKGROUND INFORMATION CAUSING THIS COMPLAINT--

12

THESE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES ARE ALLOWING WHAT I CALL AN

ALLEGED PASTOR
(BECAUSE HIS ACTIONS ARE NOT WHAT ONE KNOWS A PASTOR IS
DESCRIBED TO BE AND OPPOSITE THE WORDS HE USES VERY
DECEPTIVELY LIE AND EXTORT PEOPLE TO GET HIS WAY ),
RON BECK, OF FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CITRUS PARK TO CONTINUE HIS
ACTIONS AGAINST OTHERS AND ME, HE STARTED IN 1995, WHEN HE MADE
HIS PLAN:
TO REMOVE DR. BERRY THE SCHOOL PASTOR AND
REMOVE ME DUE TO MY LEADERSHIP OF THE BUILDING EXPANSION
PROGRAM AND
HIS JEALOUSY AND GREED
AND MY TELLING HIM HE NEEDED TO SHOW ME THE PLAN HE HAD FOR
THE EXPANSION PROGRAM AND HOW HE WAS GOING TO PAY FOR IT
AND WHAT MONEY HE ALREADY HAD IN ALL BANK ACCOUNTS TO PAY
FOR THIS PLAN.
WHEN HE DID FINALLY ALLOW ME TO COLLECT THE DETAILS OF THE
PLAN AND I RAN THE NUMBERS AT A $10 MILLION PROJECT AND AT
MOST A $3 MILLION FUND RAISING PROGRAM AND HE WANTED ME TO
GET IT DONE WITHIN 5 YEARS AND WHEN I TOLD HIM IN FRONT OF THE
COMMITTEE MEETING THAT THERE WAS NO WAY HE GREATLY
RETALIATED AT ME AFTER THE MEETING SAYING I INFLATED THE
COSTS OF THE PROJECT TO SCARE PEOPLE. I SHOWED HIM I USED THE
FORMULA APPROVED BY THE LATEST FIGURES FROM THE
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AT $77-80 A FOOT AND HE GOT MORE
ANGRY THAT I WAS SO PREPARED TO PROVE HIM WRONG! I CALLED IT
DOING MY DUTY AND HOMEWORK! THIS WAS ANOTHER REASON HE
WANTED TO PULL ME OFF THE PROJECT AND SLANDER ME THAT I WAS
TOO NEGETIVE AND NOT SUPPORTING HIS PLAN AND EXPLAIN HOW
THIS IS A ENTANGLEMENT IN RELIGEOUS BELIEFS ISSUE FOR HIM THEN
WANTING AN INJUNCTION TO KEEP ME FROM THE PROPERTY AND MY
KIDS?
BECK WANTED FULL CONTROL OF THE SAVING ACCOUNTS AND REVENUE
OF THE SCHOOL AND USE THAT MONEY TO BUILD ON A NEW PROPERTY.
BOTH DR. BERRY AND I HAD MADE STATEMENTS OF FACT THAT RON
BECK DID NOT WANT TO HEAR!
IT CAN ALSO BE SAID THAT ONLY BOTH OF US, DR. BERRY AND
MYSELF WERE NOT GUILTY OF BE A PART OF HIDING MONEY!
THEN IN AUGUST SEPTEMBER 1999 I TOOK HIM ON TO CONFRONT THE
ISSUES AS STATED ABOVE THAT HAD BREWED PRIVATELY FOR YEARS!
MANY HAVE GOTTEN AWAY FROM BECK ANY WAY THEY CAN WHEN
THEY GET THE FACTS OF HIS EXTORTION AND FRAUDS.

13

BUT I STILL HAVE BASELESS COURT ORDERED ACTIONS AGAINST ME

BECAUSE OF HIS SCHEME FROM 1995 TO FRAUD THE CHURCH AND
CONTINUING LIES TO THE COURTS AS THIS ALLEGED PASTOR TO DO
HIS CRIMES HAS STOLE MY FATHERS RIGHTS TO BE A DAD TO MY
KIDS!
HIS SCHEME AND ACTIONS TO DAMAGE ME NOW STILL INCLUDE:
AN INJUNCTION AGAINST ME THAT EVEN KEEPS ME FROM STILL
SEEING MY KIDS AS ANY NORMAL FATHER AND DAMAGING MY KIDS
AND MY REPUTATION TO COUNTLESS PEOPLE AS HIS RETALIATIONS
AGAINST ME SINCE 1995, WHEN I STARTED TO REPORT HIS ERRORS TO
HIM OF THE BUILDING PLAN-- HE TOOK FROM ME MY
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS A FATHER TO RAISE MY KIDS JUST SO HE
COULD HIDE HIS CRIMES AND LIE TO THE COURTS.
WHEN I TOLD HIM IN 1999 TO SHOW ME THE MONEY HE THEN
STARTED THE LIES THAT I HAD A STRESS RELATED BREAKDOWN
AND WAS DANGEROUS AND ALLEGED I HAD DONE CRIMINAL ACTS.
EACH OF THESE LAWSUITS HE CAUSED TO BE STARTED AS LISTED
ABOVE WHEN THE SMALLER LIES CAUGHT UP TO HIM. NOTE THE TRAIL
OF PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN ENTRAPED BY HIS FRAUDS. He and his
pastors are great at telling one thing to one group and then the opposite to the other
side.
MY DIVORCE AND RESULTING DAMAGES
SEVERE MENTAL ABUSE TO MY KIDS starting in 1995, when they were age 10
& 12
HATRED BY MANY PEOPLE AGAINST ME STILL JUST TELLING THE
TRUTH ABOUT HIS ERRORS ESCULATING TO HIS AND THEIR CRIMES.

AT FIRST NO ONE BELIEVED MY EVIDENCE THAT A PASTOR WOULD

LIE OF MISSING MONEY AND HIS LIES ABOUT THE BUILDING PROGRAM
AND HE WOULD LIE TO MY WIFE GIVING HER FALSE LEGAL ADVICE
AS PART OF THE EXTORTION PLAN AGAINST ME BUT I NOW HAVE
MANY PROOFS OF WHAT HE REALLY IS BY HIS INTENTIONAL
CRIMINAL ACTS from 1995, INCLUDING:
9 LIES UNDER OATH TO THE COURT OF JUDGE PALOMINO IN AN
AFFIDAVIT,
9 LIES IN VERBAL UNDER OATH TESTIMONY TO JUDGE PALOMINO,
9 LIES BY OTHERS THAT FLOWED FROM HIS LIES TO THEM (MY FORMER
WIFE TO JUDGES PALOMINO AND TIMMERMAN AND ATTORNEY DENNY
TO JUDGE CRENSHAW) and lies by his inner circle of alleged pastors and others
9 OVER $167,000.00 PROOF OF NOT PER THE BY-LAWS REPORTING MONEY
AND LYING TO THE CHURCH MEMBERSHIP BEING DONE IN 1999, AS IT
HAD BEEN DONE IN PAST YEARS THAT HE HAD BEEN WARNED TO STOP
9 EVIDENCE OF HIDDEN MONEY FRAUD TRAIL REVEALED AT PURCHASE
OF NEW 40 PLUS ACRES OF GUNN HIGHWAY PROPERTY BY PASTORS

14

9 STEALING FROM CHURCH KIDS THEIR PROPERTY AND THEN ACTS OF

COVERUP THAT HE ORDERED IT AND INCLUDED OTHERS IN HIS THEFT
9 WRITTEN FRAUDS AND STATEMENTS AND TRICKERY BY HIM IN MANY
CHURCH BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES AND OTHER MEETINGS AND
WRITINGS
9 VERBAL FRAUDS LEFT BY BECK ON MY ANSWERING MACHINE
9 PROOFS OF FRAUDS BY BECK AND MEISTER TO INDEPENDENT PERSONS
AT TWO DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS CHOSEN TO COUNSEL OUR
MARRIAGE
9 MULTIPLE RECORDS OF YEARS OF ABUSE BY HIM TO COVER HIS
INTENTIONAL FRAUDS AND EXTORTIONS
9 MANY EXAMPLES OF FRAUD TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
9 MANY EXAMPLES OF CONSPIRACY BY HIS STAFF AND TO HIS STAFF
9 MANY ADDITIONAL PROOFS OF VIOLATIONS OF ETHICS, AND LAWS
AND DAMAGES INCLUDING THE INJUNCTION RESULTING FROM HIS
ACTIONS THAT I WAS DANGEROUS IN ORDER TO STOP MY EXPOSURE
OF HIS CRIMES.
9 VIOLATIONS OF MISUSE OF DESIGNATED CORPORATION FUNDS
9 THAT THE ACTIONS BY THE PASTORS WOULD CAUSE PROBLEMS WITH
THE IRS AND FILINGS PER THE STATE CORPORATION GUIDELINES.
9 MULTIPLE EXAMPLES OF HIS CONSPIRACY TO FRAUD EVEN TO JUDGES.
9 PROOF OF EXTORTION ON MY NOW FORMER WIFE
9 PROOF OF EXTORTION AND ABUSE ON MY KIDS INCLUDING DOCTORS
REPORTS AND SCHOOL RECORDS AND COURT TESTIMONY AS PROOFS
9 PROOFS OF MANY LIES TOLD IN HIS PLAN HE USED TO PROMOTE THE
BUILDING PROGRAM CALLING ME A LIAR AND MY DATA A FRAUD
BUT MY POINTS PROVED TRUE NOW OVER THE YEARS
9 ADMISSIONS FROM PASTORS ON HOW HE SCHEMED TO FORCE OTHER
PASTORS TO LEAVE SO HE COULD GET POWER AND CONTROL OVER
MONEY AND PROTECT HIS CRIMINAL ACTS FROM BEING EXPOSED
WHEN MY WIFE REFUSED AFTER MY MORNING MEETING WITH RON
BECK AND HIS CRIMINALS ON SEPTEMBER 8, 1999, TO QUIT HER JOB
AND LEAVE THE CHURCH WITH ME AND THE KIDS TO:
STOP HER LYING (Finance issues, Tax Fraud as she had not told me her income for
1996, and 1997, and I had to end up telling her CPA I was going to report him for
fraud to the IRS because in filing her 1998 return which caused the argument on April
15, 1999 when I was trying to get the truth from her so I could file my taxes she was
found out to have lied about the 51% rule as to claiming the kids and she had claimed
the mortgage interest deduction on the home and she never made one penny towards
any house payment, SHE ENDED UP PAYING ME WITH A CHECK THE
DIFFERENCE IN THE AMOUNT OF MY TAXES AND IT TOOK A MAJOR
ARGUMENT WITH HER AND ME AND MY DAD FOR HER TO COME CLEAN
AND TELL US HOW SHE FILED THE MORTGAGE MONEY WHICH
AMOUNTED TO STEALING WHAT SHE WAS NOT ENTITLED TOO HAVE
CREDIT FOR, Lying about Vacations being gone most of the summer and then for a
February 2000 SKI TRIP that she said at first I could go and then lied to me that since

15

her parents were going that I was not invited but she used me to get Pastor Meister to
allow her the time off because I explained to him that as a family we really needed
that time together and he said okay but then when Karen got approval in August 1999
she then in September 1999 told me I was uninvited so this was another reason to get
her out of the house for lying-----One time Karen even told me the wrong airport to
go to when Jenny was scared to fly and then Karen lied to Jenny when I did not get to
the right airport on time. Also on more than one occasion I would take off work to go
to a school soccer or basketball game for Jason or a volley ball game for Jenny and
Karen would intentionally give me directions to the wrong school they were playing
at or the wrong directions to the wrong field and she played many wicked games like
this and I can prove these with affidavits from several people. I even bought her a
pager so I could get her to call me when she would lie to me and send me to the
wrong place because she kept saying it was a mistake but later I found out she lied on
purpose and the kids told me she did it on purpose to keep me away from the school
functions. I also caught her going on trips with other students and a man teacher and
this was very suspicious conduct. He was later fired and I was never told how my
wife was involved)
bottom line once she made her pack with the pastor in 1997 and started her own bank
account her lying and frauds to me was very routine AND
GET EXPERT COUNSELING FROM OTHER THAN THE PASTORS EITHER
TOGETHER OR JOINTLY DUE TO THE LIES SHE WAS TELLING ME
GET COUNSELING FOR HER EATING DISORDER AND STRESS
PROTECT OUR KIDS FROM ABUSE WILLIAM BROWN WAS DOING TO MY
SON, JASON AND
EXPOSE WILLIAM BROWNS VIOLATION OF HER
LISTEN TO ALL THE ABUSE WILLIAM BROWN WAS DOING TO ME IN MY
DUTIES OF LEADERSHIP
STOP HER MISUSE OF OUR FAMILY MONEY
QUIT TELLING LIES TO THE PASTORS AND SHERIFF DEPUTY HOWLETT
AS THAT PLAYED RIGHT INTO THEIR HANDS
ADMIT THAT THE CHURCH RECORDS I SHOWED HER OF THE TRAIL OF
MISSING MONEY FOUND TO THAT POINT WERE CRIMINAL ACTS AND
FRAUD BY THE PASTORS.
QUIT GIVING MEDICATIONS TO OUR KIDS THAT HER MOTHER SENT HER
SHOW ME HER TAX RETURNS AND 1099s FROM THE PAST 3 YEARS
STOP HER OVERWORK AND STRESS AND
STOP CANCELLING OUR TALKING SESSIONS
STOP THE LYING OF THE PASTORS FROM THEIR COUNSELING AND
GET AWAY FROM THE PASTORS MANY ACTS OF NEGLIGENCE AND
FRAUD AND ATTACKS ON OUR FAMILY AND THE LIES TO THE CHURCH
SHE CHOSE TO SAY I WAS LYING TO HER AND SHE CHOSE TO STAY
BECAUSE OF HER LOVE OF THE OTHER PEOPLE WITH HER JOB AND THE
KIDS DID NOT WANT TO LEAVE THEIR SCHOOL SINCE KINDERGARDEN.
I HAD NOTHING ELSE I COULD DO TO GET HER TO JUST LOOK AT THE
TRAIL OF FACTS OF LIES AND FRAUDS BY THE PASTORS AS COVERING
16

HER ILLEGAL ACTS WAS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE INTERESTS OF

THE FAMILY AND ME.
I KNOW NOW THAT HER MOTIVES TO LIE TO ME DURING 1997 OR BEFORE
WERE DUE TO HER SETTING UP OUR MARRIAGE TO FAIL AND SO SHE
COULD HAVE A DIVORCE AND CLAIM TO BE INNOCENT TO THE
PROBLEMS. AND INTENTIONALLY SHE USED THE SITUATION WITH THE
PASTORS TO HAVE THEIR SUPPORT SO SHE COULD FOR NO REASON OF
ACTS I DID KEEP THE KIDS AWAY FROM ME SO SHE COULD GET CUSTODY
AND UPON GRADUATIONS OR AS IT HAPPENED SOONER MOVE THEM WITH
HER BACK TO HER MOMMY. THE PATTERN OF HER ACTIONS SINCE 1997,
AND HER AFFILIATION WITH THE PASTORS AND ACTS DONE WITH HER
BROTHER SHOW HER PATTERNS OF LYING TO COURTS, THE I.R.S., SHERIFF
DEPUTIES AND TO MANY FRIENDS TRYING TO SET ME UP AS A CRIMINAL
TO MAKE HER LOOK ABUSED.
HER MOTIVES HAVE BEEN REVEALED WHEN SHE ATTEMPTED TO LIE TO
THE COURTS AND GET POSESSION OF THE HOME WHICH SHE HAD TOLD
JUDGE PALOMINO TO GIVE HER ALLEGED PORTION TO THE HUSBANDS
PARENTS AND HER GET NOTHING. THEN HER MOTIVES TO JUDGE
TIMMERMAN CHANGED TO HER NEW LIES SO SHE COULD STEAL MORE
MONEY! SHE EVEN ONCE LIED TO HER DAD TO GET A NEW CAR!
THE FORMER WIFE REPEATEDLY THROUGHOUT THE MARRIAGE ALWAYS
PUT THE FAMILY GOALS SECOND TO WHAT EVER HER MOTHER NORMA
AND HER BROTHERS STEVE AND KEITH TOLD HER TO DO. THEY HAVE
REPEATEDLY LIED TO ME AND ABUSED OUR FAMILY AND MY KIDS!
BASED ON THE FACT THAT SHE CHOSE TO PLAY INTO THE HANDS OF
BECK, MEISTER, LEATHERMAN, BROWN AND HOWLETT AND WAS WILLING
TO HELP THEIR EXTORTIONS AGAINST ME TO EVEN CALL THEM AND
MAKE UP STORIES TO HAVE ME PUT IN JAIL FROM MY OWN HOME TO HIDE
HER CRIMES WHILE SHE IGNORED THE FACTS AS STATED ABOVE, SHE
WAS INTENTIONALLY HURTING ME AND THE FAMILY.
AFTER ABOUT A MONTH (September 8, 1999- October 11, 1999) OF ADDITIONAL
CONVERSATIONS AND STRESS BY THE PASTORS AND OTHERS INCLUDING
HOWELTT AND JEFFERS, TURNING UP THE STRESS ON HER AND THE KIDS
AND MYSELF, AND HER TELLING MORE LIES AND TWO ATTEMPTS TO
CREATE AN ARGUMENT AND HAVE THEN THE SHERIFF CALLED TO THE
HOUSE AND PUT ME IN JAIL FOR ACTS SHE DID AS SHE ALLEGED WOULD
CALL TO BECK AND HOWLETT AND OTHERS, I TOLD HER RATHER THAN
HER CONTINUING TEMPER TANTRUMS AND LYING TO GET ME PUT IN JAIL
AS BECK HAD PRIVATELY WARNED ME HE WOULD ATTEMPT TO DO IF I
CAME TO THE CHURCH, SHE HAD TO LEAVE THE HOME AND THUS THE
LETTER OF OCTOBER 11, 1999, WRITTEN TO HER USED OUT OF CONTEXT BY
HER ATTORNEY STACEY TURMEL TO JUDGE TIMMERMAN AND PLAN OF
SILENCE BY SCRUGGS TO CONTINUE HIS FRAUDS SINCE 2000. THEY HAD A

17

PACK THAT BECK HOWLETT AND KAREN COULD PUT ME IN JAIL SO MY

ACTIONS HAVE BEEN SELF DEFENSE TO THEIRS AND HER TOTAL ABILITY
TO LIE.
KAREN WAS ALSO WARNED BY BECK AS HE TOLD SEVERAL PEOPLE IF
SHE DID NOT RECONCILE WITH HER HUSBAND THEN SHE COULD NOT
REMAIN A TEACHER AT THE SCHOOL. This was even told to me and to my
parents in separate meetings with Beck.
BECK HAD MET WITH MY PARENTS AND LIED TO THEM ON SEVERAL
MATTERS AS WELL!
KAREN HARROD TOWNSEND STILL ADDS TO HER CRIMINAL ACTS TODAY
AND STILL ADDS ONE LIE ON TOP OF ANOTHER AS SHE FEARS JAIL THEN
AND NOW AND COVERS UP FOR HER CRIMES THEN, DONE BY HER AND
HER MOTHER AND HER BROTHER AND HER INVOLVMENT TO HELP BECK.
PLEASE INTERVIEW MY KIDS AND THEY SHOULD TELL THE TRUTH
BUT THEY FEAR THEIR MOTHER AND HER FAMILY AND THEIR ABUSE!
THEY ARE SCARED STILL AND NUMB TO THE LIES OF THE PASTORS AND
THEIR MOTHER! THEY HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED SINCE AGE 10 & 12
BY THEIR MOTHER AND PASTORS AND TEACHERS AND THEIR
MOTHERS PARENTS AND FAMILY AND THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND
FULLY RIGHT FROM WRONG.
When in August -September 1999, I told Ron Beck the Senior alleged pastor, the years
of warnings, (SEE WARNINGS SECTION BELOW) were over and I was
investigating issues to make public against the pastors that may call for their resignation
and criminal charges, Ron Beck and his band of thieves began on the meeting day of
September 8, 1999:
First, saying he as a pastor could not say what was really going on due to his being a
pastor and he could not betray what he heard while counseling people but
everyone had to just trust him and Randy needed counseling
saying lies that I was potentially dangerous and
had a stress related breakdown and
lies saying I was making false charges about missing money and
saying I must be banned from the property and if seen notify the pastor or office
immediately---Karen admitted this was said in teachers meetings
pulled my wife out of her teaching class and gave her lies that I broke down
banned me even from my own wife and kids and
be removed from all my professional BY-LAW duties
illegal traffic stops and harassment by Deputies when I came to the property to see
my kids
physical assault abuse by Jeffers and Howlett when I was invited by a church member
to attend the July 2001 Business Meeting in which they were voting on William
Brown in his Administrative Position of the not for profit corporation and those that
knew what I knew was critical for everyone to know before they voted to keep Brown
and other staff members on the payroll as officers of the Corporation including the

18

Pastors. Ron Beck had Joe Howlett on the steps of the church to not let me enter and
then Howlett and Jeffers did assault and battery and used extortion to my wife and me
when she arrived and they said per the Fed EX letter Beck sent to me that I would be
arrested by Howlett if I entered the property
also I challenged how my membership was allegedly voted out based on Beck
misrepresenting a letter written to him by pastors from Idlewild Baptist as a tactic to
get Ron Beck from abusing and extorting my family
others had Beck for years say he would meet with me but never did
written letters from Beck telling me he would put me in jail for showing up to a
meeting others had invited me to attend
when some in leadership still nave about the issues would invite me to wait outside a
meeting so they could call me in to speak, Beck and Howlett would turn that in to a
situation of stalking
in one allegedly only Pastors and Deacons meeting, others were being told Howlett as
a deputy not a deacon or church official had to be there to keep me from being violent
and when I reached to the floor to get my notes from my brief case Howlett screamed
to get my hands on the table and then the meeting was ended as Beck and Leatherman
completing their fraud scene.
abuse by the inner circle of thieves at many public areas away from the property
which led to others from the congregation and alleged friends who only knew the
BAND OF THIEVES LIES
both children have had to have medical attention caused by the stress from this
situation from 1999 still up to now as they suffer from conditions that the mother has
caused by her giving them this stress and drugs she gave them
had the lawsuits filed against me by Beck on behalf of the Church/School and my
wife due to his illegal legal advice and his extortion on my wife and kids

so to stop the investigation of his criminal activities and negligence and torts to my
family from his earlier attempts to remove me from my position of Long Range Planning
Committee Chairman since 1995 and then the start of show me the money in hidden in
secret accounts and in hidden designated accounts in 1996.
Ron Beck spread these accusations in conspiracy to/with his assistant pastors, Meister
and Brown, who had helped him in his multiple frauds and to the Finance Committee
who had also produced publications of false records and speaking in Business Meetings,
helping him to hide the money from me asking as Long Range Planning Committee
Chairman and other Corporation Members and then to a church Trustee Howlett.
Two of the men Beck involved were on the Finance Committee and as a TRUSTEE.
These two men were also Sheriff Deputies who with their uniforms many times using
their role as SHERIFF to help Beck create scenes to make it looks like my peaceful
attending the church/school property or sons soccer game to see my kids was that I was
there to abuse someone alleging stalking.
They did this to block my finding more evidence or talking to more people of the
multiple crimes and the cover-up of the missing money and then proofs of conspiracy and
extortion they had conspired to hide and then the money they quietly put back into the
Business Reports after they had people afraid of me and while waiting for STATUE OF

19

LIMITATIONS TO EXPIRE and in the process create more of these alleged stalking
schemes to keep up the fear of people as a deflection from my proofs of the missing
money and lies about the GROWTH plan for the Church and School. Things Denny
continues to BLOCK illegally.
Alleged pastors and Gary Leatherman (Chairman of Finance Committee) and deputies
Joe Howlett and Tim Jeffers, conspired and used lies and extortion on my wife as a
teacher and kids as students that they would be kicked out of the school and loose their
jobs if they did not keep quiet and let the alleged Sheriff Joe Howlett and Tim Jeffers
handle their alleged potentially dangerous husband/father as this would protect the
pastors and finance committee and the ministry from what the pastors wanted to say was
false charges.
Ron Beck then spread these created actions allegedly by me with false testimony he
created and testimony that Leatherman and the Sheriff Deputies Howlett and Jeffers were
willing to use to keep them from being exposed for helping to hide Church money.

WARNINGS TO RON BECK IN AUGUST-SEPTEMBER, 1999

(1) Beck had no right to give legal advice to my wife or to others claiming what he
knew about my business lawsuits to protect my business rights when he never
asked me to even explain to him what the issues were of the business lawsuits or
their status but only took Karens version who herself did not show interest or
know the elements of the cases. He did this to undercut my own authority in my
own self employed business and family as he just wanted gossip. He said a
Christian should not do lawsuits but my matters in 1988 started as a
REQUEST FOR A DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT, and then in 2001 BECK
sent me the letter of July 26, 2001 as attached exhibit A in my 2002 lawsuit and
then he filed his lawsuit against me in November 2, 2001, and advised my wife
how to do her lawsuit and the records reveal his writings on the documents.
Judge Palomino proved his charges were wrong even though no evidence of his
false intentions to deceive the court about my actions was shown by me or
attorney Scruggs as Scruggs told me not to get into my proofs of

Becks or Karens frauds of the Church as my defense to

JUDGE PALOMINO.
(2) Beck had no understanding of my family business or needs or my legal business
or right to give legal advice to my wife regarding my personal finances and my
companys business and he guided her that his family and the school pastor
Herman Meister had separate checking accounts for the husband and wife and
she should do the same to stop me from using her money to run my business and
this was causing stress to the marriage as then money was missing and even
caused her to fraud me on our Income Taxes during 1996-1998. He just needed
gossip reasons to remove me from leadership because I was getting hot on his
trail of deceptions and frauds he had caused in the missing church/school money
and building project frauds.
(3) Beck had lied to the church about the stealing of the microphone from the
church kids program. He said was done by the music leader but was done at his
order to do so even though he was told how this act was illegal as the system had

20

been bought with designated funds and Beck had no right to steal from the kids
and I suffer retaliation from him and his pastors to shut up about their crimes.
The sheriff deputy Howlett, even later admitted it was a crime what Beck did
called it stealing but due to his other involvements to cover up the larger
hidden money and extortions he would not say it publicly or as a deputy file
charges.
(4) William Brown had been caught with another secret bank account he was using
for his youth programs and maybe other activities as I was denied to review the
actual trail of money because of the acts done by BECK ON SEPTEMBER 8,
1999 and since WITH THE HELP OF BROWN, LEATHERMAN, MEISTER,
JEFFERS AND HOWLETT but did later find out the fund was about $2000.00
per Gary Leatherman but that may have been another lie by Gary just to
deflate the extent of the damages. Pastors repeatedly had been warned to not
have Secret accounts and all money was to be reported every 90 days per the
BY-LAWS and go through the proper committees for approvals and reporting.
Brown was told he got his new title because of the violations of this rule by
Elbert Nasworthy, the previous Administrator. They had been told this since the
OLD school monies disappeared from the reporting in 1998. Then in May 2,
1999, report $43,400.81 comes up short in the December January CHURCH
ASSEST SALARY FUND and that same fund had during October November
had jumped $43, 685.37. Ron Beck nor any finance committee member nor the
church finance secretary Paula Powell would report to me where the money
came from and where it went yet to this day in November 2005! Also where did
the money used to by the CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS BOUGHT IN 1999, (if
this was the building fund accounts as Gary Leatherman advised) come from if
the total building fund in 3rd quarter March, 1998, were only $22,676.93 and the
C D accounts added up to $165,285.95 or a $163,018.02 difference when it
appears the growth of this account is from donations only $8000.00 a period of 3
months per the March 2000 statement. Note Church Business Meeting Minutes
as proofs many people for years were trying to get straight answers about
money in these accounts and no one wanted surprise accounts or trouble with
the State or the IRS. THE STAFF HAD BEEN REPEATEDLY WARNED BY
OPEN MEETINGS, AND ALLEGEDLY BY GARY LEATHERMAN AND BY
THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND BY MYSELF THAT CHARGES COULD
COME FOR THE PASTORS NOT KEEPING THE BOOKS CLEAN.
(5) IT IS BECAUSE OF ASKING THESE TYPE OF QUESTIONS OF THE
SALARY FUND AND WHAT IS IN THE DESIGNATED BUILDING FUND
AND ALL SECRET ACCOUNTS THAT BECK HAD ME KICKED OUT OF
THE CHURCH AND STARTED HIS CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF I HAD A
STRESS RELATED BREAKDOWN ON SEPTEMBER 8, 1999, lying to my
wife and others as his father and Gary Leatherman, on or about September 5-8,
1999 told Beck I demanded proof of the accounts or I may ask for the pastors to
resign. NOTE BECK LETTER OF SEPT. 13, 1999, SAYING HE RESIGN.
(6) I now had confessions on how Beck and Meister had hidden years worth of
money from School accounts. I did not learn until 2000, from Meister, how
Beck had forced Dr. Berry, the former school pastor who every one loved and

21

who built the school, to leave the ministry in their fight over how to spend
School designated money and how Beck and Meister had conspired to kick out
Dr. Berry. Meister told me this as a warning of what they would do to me but
also he did it as a form of he wished he had not helped Beck back then but it was
too late.
(7) William Brown admitted that the other pastors also had secret accounts, Music
Director Dennis Williams, School Pastor Herman Meister and Ron Beck himself
and they were warned many times this was not approved conduct. I even
watched Beck one time in a book store make charges on his Credit Card and
then watched the company financial reports/books the next quarter to learn
how the charges were paid for and then reported in the books but never found
out. This led me to understand maybe another secret account. As Awana
Commander they expected me to even divide out and report on receipts things
to down to about $5.00 yet they would keep thousands hid.
(8) A little girl got hurt that first Wednesday night of 1999, due to the negligence of
William Brown and Ron Beck himself not getting the Awana areas cleaned up
by the custodians as they both promised they might even do the cleaning
themselves but it would be done. They lied and I had to do things again myself
the next week as they were lazy and then lied about things again!
(9) I told him of William Browns lying to my son about the computer work Jason
did for him and the Church as a minor at no pay and then after all the work was
ready Brown in his negligence forgot to use the work and then lied on why the
work was not good enough hurting the feelings of my son! Possible child labor
law violations with not just my son.
(10) Even Meister had called the actions of Brown Incompetent and this was
causing stress on me getting my duties done.
(11) Ron Beck had been out of town on a vacation to Jeckyl Island he extended
without permissions of the personnel committee and had charged excess
personal expenses on his church credit card and while he was away his pastors
Meister and Brown got into a major fight what was later called the Ice
Machine War over secret money accounts and switching school use rooms for
youth rooms and other remodeling and their lying to each other. I got caught in
the middle of the assistant pastors lying to each other because as my role to over
see the room uses as Long Range Planning I had not been briefed on their
actions which lead to their fighting even to the point of harsh words and jabs
being said from the pulpit that August Sunday morning.
(12) The pastors had lied about having a bus ready for a kids camping trip of
about 45 kids and parents stranding us and thus forced a bus to be used that did
not have a tag, insurance, gas or was mechanically safe while they sat at a
Christmas Party Prime Rib dinner and then lied about the cover up of their
negligent acts to harm the kids and their violation of the laws regarding the bus.
(13) As Long Range Planning Chairman my presentation to the Church was
ready and the direction I was going to make personally was not to move to new
property but buy surrounding property and remodel some existing areas so we
could stay in budget. Beck brought in his experts with tainted and deceitful
information to make my data look flawed but actually my data later after I was

22

banned from the property my data was supported by their drawings. Beck
wanted only to move to the new property which was estimated at $10 million
verses my plan at about half that expense and could be done much quicker in
maybe 2-3 years with much less debt verses as it shows now they still have not
come even close to the pastors plan or timeline now almost 10 years later. Beck
could not let me present publicly my plan and costs numbers and timeline as it
would not cure his ego only to move to the new property and do it quicker than
Idlewild Baptist project. Idlewild now has done two projects and Beck has built
one building. His first attempt at having me removed from the Long Range
Planning Committee had failed as he tried to use the By-Laws incorrectly that
there were term limits for that position but the Deacons shot that down. Then
he had justified shifting authority from me by creating a new committee but my
voice remained strong and people were starting to see his frauds as I shared
thoughts in the meetings.
(14) Beck used the need to have the pastors and Leatherman and Jeffers and
Howlett to unite and stay out of jail and thus conspire against me in order for
them to stay employed or in leadership to cover up for their hiding money and
other crimes and for this they had to do as Herman Meister yelled at me one
night, We made a pack to deny and destroy anything you say! I guess that
even means lying. I went to Meister to find out why my daughter said she was
missing so many classes and that her Dr. Lynn was not treating her headaches
which was causing her to miss school. My former wife would not talk to me and
I thought that the school should know the frauds of their teacher on my
daughter and Meister got violent.
(15) Beck was going to be exposed for signing the settlement for the eminent
domain case when it had been shorted by mistake for $28,000.00 and the
committee did not review the draft before it was signed as I was promised we
would be allowed. I caught the error by Beck and he threatened me to stay
quiet that what was done was done.
(16) ONE MAJOR FACT THAT CAUSED RON BECK TO RETALIATE
AGAINST ME IS ONE OF MY BEST FRIENDS WAS HIS FATHER, Jr. Beck,
AND Jr. BECK KNOWING WHAT I KNEW AND THE EXTENT OF MY
ALLOGATIONS BEING INVESTIGATED. JR. BECK TOLD ME ON
SEPTEMBER 5, 1999, TO CONFRONT RON HEAD UP AND Jr. WAS SURE
RON WOULD COME CLEAN IF HE TRULY WAS GUILTY. JR. BECK
SAID MANY TIMES THAT IS NOT HOW HIS MAMA AND I RAISED
HIM Instead Ron Beck on September 8, 1999, went CRAZY! I told Ron and
his pastors in the meeting on September 8, 1999, If you take my keys (to 99%
of the doors on the property) you are telling me you do not want the truth. He
took my keys. Jr. was in shock at what happen and called me and spoke to me
in great sorrow one day at the mall and asked for forgiveness for what had
happened. Jr. was ready to tell the truth how he had already helped me expose
Ron and some of the missing money but died from a heart attack soon
thereafter.
(17) Ron Beck even made several lies to my parents who went to him to clear up
matters.

23

(18) Many other issues of his acts are reported in over 200 pages of documents
which Beck admitted to Judge Palomino he showed in court but greatly frauded
Judge Palomino to the intent and contents of these letters to the Church while
Scruggs kept silent to the Judge and lied to his client and said follow his plan.
WHEN RON BECK SAW IN SEPTEMBER 1999, HE HAD ME, MY PARENTS,
GARY LEATHERMAN AND HIS DAD, JR. AND OTHERS COMING TO HIM
AND EVEN MORE PEOPLE WOULD GET CURIOUS FOR ANSWERING THE
QUESTIONS I WAS RAISING HE RETALIATED AND CLAIMED I HAD THE
STRESS RELATED BREAKDOWN AND WAS DANGEROUS SO TO
SCARE EVERYONE TO STAY AWAY SO HE COULD SPIN THE TRUTH AND
LIE ALL THE MORE! People did not believe how he threatened to put me in jail
in 1999, but the letter arrived FED EX in July, 2001, the Day after the confrontation
on the steps of the church when I went as an invited person to show to the Church
members the reports of the frauds I had collected and this proved what actions he
said privately. Howlett, Jeffers, Shumate and others did the attack in front of the
church to the meeting I was invited to attend and Howlett said he would arrest me if
I stepped on the property. Jeffers and Howlett then assaulted my wife and took her
by the arm and led her to her car. These deputies were out of control to keep from
loosing their deputy jobs and going to jail as violations of their Sheriff and Trustee
duties.
MY KNOWLEDGE OF BUSINESS PRACTICES AT MANY LEVELS, FLORIDA
STATUES, YEARS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE COMMUNITY AND CHURCH
AND MY BY-LAWS MEMBERSHIP DUTIES TO THE CHURCH MEMBERSHIP
AND LEADER OF A GROUP OF ABOUT 200 KIDS REQUIRED ME TO ACCEPT
AND DO WHAT I WAS ASKED TO DO TO REPORT CRIMES AND TO:
1) LEAD THE GROWTH OF THE CHURCH AND SCHOOL AS LONG RANGE
PLANNING COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN SINCE 1992, when the Church was looking to
control its School and Church growth as a group of men including Deacons came to me
to ask me to serve as a member of the Long Range Planning Committee. This Committee
then elected me as Chairman and was put in charge while the Church searched for a new
pastor. Then Ron Beck arrived at the Church in 1994, and soon thereafter the lying
and frauds began as he will do anything to elevate his scheme, of pride and frauds.
(2)FIND MISSING MONEY FROM THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CITRUS
PARK AND CITRUS PARK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FUNDS AS FOR SEVERAL
YEARS THE NUMBERS REPORTED BY SENIOR ALLEGED PASTOR RON
BECK DONT ADD UP AND REPORTING ANSWERS TO MAJOR QUESTIONS BY
MEMBERS WAS BEING STALLED and the Finance Committee acted as if they were
being stalled by the pastors and
(3) As the AWANA CHILDRENS PROGRAM LEADER PROTECT THE KIDS FROM
MULTIPLE ACTS OF NEGLIGENCE BY THE PASTORS AND FIND OUT WHY
OUR NEW SPECIALLY BOUGHT MICROPHONE WAS STOLEN AND SWITCHED
FOR A SYSTEM THAT HAD MAJOR PROBLEMS in September 1999.
(4)REPORT OTHER ISSUES OF FRAUDS AND MISCONDUCT BY THE CHURCH
AND SCHOOL PASTORS AND OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (ONE OF WHICH
WAS MY WIFENOW FORMER WIFE)

24

FOR THE CHURCH MEMBERSHIP TO PROTECT THE INTERESTS OF THE

CORPORATION AND REPORT TO LEGAL AUTHORITIES AS NECESSARY PER
MY ROLE AS A CHURCH OFFICER IN CHARGE OF MANY DUTIES!
(5) INVESTIGATE THE ALLEGATIONS MADE BY THE FINANCE COMMITTEE
IN THEIR ANNUAL AND QUARTERLY REPORTS AS IN THE TOWNSEND v
BECK CASE FILE AS TO WHY THE PASTORS WERE NOT COOPERATING WITH
BEING PURE AS THE DRIVEN SNOW AS GARY LEATHERMAN SAID TO BE.
BASED ON THE FALSE LIES BY RON BECK I WENT IN JUST A FEW DAYS
FROM BEING IN THESE MANY DUTIES AND EVEN BEING THANKED FOR
AT THE LAST MINUTE STEPPING IN AS THE SOCCER REFEREE FOR THE
HIGH SCHOOL SOCCER MATCH WHEN STATE OFFICIALS DID NOT
SHOW UP AND THE MATCH DID NOT HAVE TO CANCELLED AND I HAD A
FLORIDA YOUTH SOCCER REFEREE LICENSE TO BEING BANNED FROM
EVERYTHING AND EVEN BECK SCARING MY KIDS TO NOT BE AROUND
ME!
I HAD BEEN INVOLVED IN FLORIDA YOUTH SOCCER FOR SEVERAL
YEARS AS A BOARD MEMBER AND RESPONSIBLE FOR RUNNING THE
DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM AT NORTHDALE SOCCER CLUB FOR
OVER 1000 KIDS A YEAR AND ORGANIZING THE TRAVELING TEAMS
FOR SEVERAL CLUBS INTERPLAY LEAGUE FOR THE DISTRICT.
I HAVE ALWAYS WORKED TO HELP EVERY KID EVEN COACHING AS
MANY AS 6 TEAMS AT ONE TIME UNTIL COACHES STEPPED UP AND I
HAVE NEVER HURT ANYONE!
I WAS ALSO VOTED FLORIDA YOUTH SOCCER VOLUNTEER OF THE YEAR
FOR 1995.
I WENT FROM HIGHLY RESPECTED TO HAVING A BUNCH OF
CRIMINALS CALLED PASTORS TRYING TO KILL MY REPUTATION AND
MY FAMILY SO THEY CAN COVER FOR THEIR CRIMES AND STAY OUT
OF JAIL. WHAT PASTORS OR A CHURCH DOES THIS?
NO BODY OTHER THAN BECK AND KAREN CLAIM TO CALL ME AS
DANGEROUS. I SERVED COUNTLESS HOURS A WEEK FOR OVER 8
YEARS PROTECTING KIDS AND HELPING THEM LEARN TO BE VALUED
CITIZENS SO HOW CAN BECK KILL ME SO EASILY WHEN ONE DOES
LOOK AT HIS CRIMES.
I HAVE NEVER DONE ONE VIOLENT ACT TO NO ONE BUT ONLY THOSE
THAT BREAK THE LAW WILL ONLY FEAR MY WORDS AND PAPER
TRAIL OF THEIR CRIMES!
BECAUSE OF ATTORNEY FIGHTING AND LYING TO A JUDGE AND THEN
HIM COVERING UP HIS WRONGDOING AND OTHER JUDGES AND
ATTORNEYS COVERING UP THE MALPRACTICE I NOW HAVE NOT SEEN
MY KIDS NOW FOR OVER THREE YEARS! BECAUSE THE FORMER WIFE
STILL LIES AND THE QUESTION IS WHAT JUDGE OR ATTORNEY IS
GOING TO LIE NEXT TO COVER UP THE PREVIOUS LIES!

25

MY CORPORATION OFFICER DUTIES WERE

As the LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE CHAIRMANA Committee in
charge for planning and directing the Church/School to expand the current property to
acquire adjoining property or move the ministry to a totally new site from about 1992.
As the AWANA childrens program COMMANDERlead the childrens K5- 6th grade
Church program.
As a NOMINATION COMMITTEE MEMBERreview the ethical conduct and ability
to serve status of all persons in leadership positions.
As a member act per the duties of the BY-LAW of any member in good standing as a
binding written contract for all to observe.
Also as a State Of Florida, Security Officer with a Class D license.
Also as Florida Youth Soccer Volunteer of the Year in 1995 and several other civic
functions.
Also my uncle as a pastor helped start that church back in the 1940s.
When I brought my findings and concerns up to that point during August-September
1999, to someone other than the pastors themselves, to Gary Leatherman, as Chairman of
the Finance Committee to inform him how the Finance Committee was not being told
about money in secret accounts just admitted again by the pastors and thus the not
reporting truthful information in the Quarterly Business Meetings, he claimed he did not
know about secret accounts. But knowledge now shows he did and intentionally lied
to even help HOWLETT work his crimes.
I also went to Gary Leatherman asking how I could purchase the needed Awana Supplies
as I had been told by pastor of administration William Brown, that the church had no
money to buy the $1000.00 worth of yearly start up supplies needed August 1999 as
William Brown said didnt you read the bulletin and what the pastor wrote Sunday.
This bulletin is available and shows the church is behind budget. Just another evidence of
fraud.
I also inquired of Gary as to what money was actually in the BUILDING FUNDS as I
had learned there were church funds and school funds being set aside and no reporting.
I also got conflicting answers from Finance Committee member, Tim Jeffers as he told
me he did not know but would get back to me. I told him the numbers in the Church
bulletin do not look right verses the latest Quarterly report.
I also reported several other violations the pastors were doing and he confided in me as
we both were trying collecting all the data for each of the pastors violations of By-LAWS
and Florida Statues.
Gary played dumb and acted that he as a Corporation Officer, would help me get the
proofs still needed for final conclusions and then proceed with me with the process as
necessary to protect the Corporation as per his recorded words in the minutes from the
Business Meetings.
Gary Leatherman rather than help with connecting the dots on all the proofs of the
violations as he promised he told me he was going to do himself and was glad I was there
to support and work with him and his committee in concert with my knowledge instead
joined in with the conspiracy and illegal acts and this formed the BAND OF THIEVES of

26

the Senior Pastor Ronald Lee Beck; Pastor of Administration William Brown; School
Pastor/Principle of the School Herman Meister; Finance Committee Chairman Gary
Leatherman; Trustee Joe Howlett, also a Hillsborough County Sheriff Deputy; Trustee
Tim Jeffers these men to cover up the fact that for 2-3 years the Quarterly Business
Reports and the YEARLY Summary of Business Reports were not truthful but in fact
showed multiple events of fraud. Later joining the frauds was Bob Giles and Mike
Shumate and Mark Nunes. Gary at first, denied he knew about the missing money and he
and his committee were looking into these matters also, but he actually knew of that and
much more internal fraud that only his finance committee had known about the additional
violations of the pastors. I alleged that at first based on Garys misinformation that he
nor his committee knew about the secret accounts it was just intentional fraud by Senior
Pastor Ron Beck and Assistant Pastors Herman Meister, William Brown and former
assistant administrative pastor Elbert Nasworthy as these men felt it not wrong to have
their own private funds to do with as they pleased and not within the approval programs
set up by committees overseeing the use of all funds but later I pointed out that Gary
working with me was only a betrayal and stall tactic while the funds were put in
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS and other trails hid. Also when the yearly
books were closed then these pastors would not report these OLD FUNDS and
however dipped into these old funds in secret accounts again without reporting these
funds for how the funds then were spent. Beck told me since it was not within the current
business year then these funds did not have to be reported in the Quarterly Business
Reports per the BY-LAWS. I suspect when Gary learned of these additional secret
accounts and then that maybe how these funds were not reported as the State laws and
IRS require then they had to conspire to get even himself clean without being criminally
charged as I planned to do to bring charges to whomever was involved.
I informed these pastors for about 2 years that this conduct was illegal to the BY-LAWS
and also I believed constituted fraud per the Florida Statues and they must clean up their
act immediately. The Business Reports that others were partly clued in on these acts but
no one truly knew how much money was involved.
EVEN TODAY DUE TO THE HELPING THEIR CLIENTS PERPETRATE A FRAUD
AND VIOLATE AND NOT RESPOND TO MY REQUESTS TO PRODUCE AND
REQUESTED SUBPOENAS, BEFORE THE COURTS, ATTORNEY DREW
GARDNER AND CHARLES DENNY HAVE VIOLATED THEIR CANONS AND
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEEDURE AS WILL BE LISTED HEREIN TO HELP BECK
AND OTHERS ESCAPE JAIL.
I HAVE AS THIS HAS BEEN ONGOING REPORTED THESE FACTS AND ACTS
TO MANY PEOPLE AS LISTED BELOW AND NOW TO THE FLORIDA BAR AND
THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMITTEE AND OTHERS:
INTERNAL AFFAIRS-- HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT.
INTERNAL AFFAIRS --PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT SGT. PAUL GUARINO
SEVERAL DEPUTIES AT DISTRICT THREE TO TELL HOWLETT TO BACK OFF.

27

SPENT A DAY IN SEVERAL MEETINGS WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES

OF THE COURT BEING DIRECTED BY LYNN MEEHAN COURT PROGRAM
MANAGER TALKING WITH LEGAL AND THE CHIEF JUDGE.
SENT LETTERS TO THE HILLSBOROUGH SHERIFF, STATE ATTORNEY,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OTHERS.
WENT TO THE STATE ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF MARK OBER.
NO ONE HAS YET TOLD ME MY ACTIONS HAVE NOT ONLY BEEN
HONORABLE AND THEY DO NOT KNOW WHAT ACT OR CRIME I DID TO
DESERVE THE WAY THE COURTS AND ATTORNEYS NOR PASTORS
SHOULD HAVE TREATED ME THIS VIOLENTLY BUT NO ONE HAS
STOPPED THE DANGEROUS RON BECK AND THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF
THE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS!
NOW IT IS TIME FOR THE FLORIDA BAR AND THE JUDICIAL
QUALIFICATIONS AND OTHER AGENCIES TO STOP THE CRIMINAL ACTS!
BASED ON THE FACTS ABOVE AND OTHER DETAILS THAT CAN CONNECT
MORE DOTS THESE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES BELOW MUST BE HELD
RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ADDITIONS TO THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF RON
BECK AND OTHERS INCLUDING THE LIES BY THE FORMER WIFE!
I WILL BE ALERT TO IMMEDIATE INTERVENTION OF THESE VILE CRIMES!
PART THREE:
SPECIFIC PERSONS TO INVESTIGATE FOR VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA
BAR RULES
ACTS FOR THE FLORIDA BAR TO INVESTIGATE OF RON BECK
Ron Beck practiced multiple times giving fraudulent legal advice through his
alleged but more like cult pastoral positions saying things he allegedly got from his
personal knowledge or the Christian Law Association (Gardner, Gibbs or others) or
Cary Gaylord as counsel in the eminent domain case. Beck was counseling my wife
privately as court transcripts to Judge Palomino and Judge Timmerman state and
infer their joint intent as Karen stated to Judge Timmerman in the transcript of
January 30, 2003, to send him a message which that message was a pure fraud to
cover for many yet totally unknown illegally conspired acts including using each
other (wife and pastor) to remove from me my fathers rights to see and raise and
protect my kids and he was making public statements in church meetings and
private meetings alleging he had support for his position but he did not many times.
Beck even had his wife lie to me one night at the mall and Beck even one time at the
convenience store tried to start a scene. He has even got in his car and chased me.
And in December 1999, even came to my house and made promises he did not keep
and even threatened me and then lied about the entire event when he sat right in my
home. He said we were going to meet with my wife when she returned from taking
my kids to Pensacola for Christmas in a meeting he did not keep because he went on
a cruise and had family in town and got too busy for our meeting.

28

But he was:
lying about business laws that affected my personal business ventures making my
then wife think I was lying to her about what my business attorneys were telling me.
This then lead to her intentionally trying to deceive me about our personal family
finances and tax returns based on Becks lies that I was lying to her. His own words to
me were I should not be suing anybody.
Lying to her that I had no right to sue to protect my business
Lying to her and others as to what produced alleged conduct that would lead to him
and my wife filing the REPEAT VIOLENCE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE as
stalking charges in case 01-15813 and 01-15814. My just normal acts of seeing my
kids Beck because of his guilt made to look like I was stalking but I never gave up my
right to see and raise my kids but he took those rights from me by having his own
private sheriff deputy harass me to exaggerate the issues on purpose by Beck and
Howlett and Jeffers and Tampa Police Officer Joe Kareras.
Lying to Church and school members and the public at large the words they twisted
from Judge Palomino allegedly November 15, 2001, saying that their next step was
file criminal charges against me in defiance to the transcripts of the actual testimony
in the trial and this is what Attorney Denny verified by his Affirmative Defense as a
lie misrepresenting what Judge Palomino actually said to Judge Crenshaw in October
2003 and this was all normal lay people needed to hear to continue to make me and
treat me like every act to see my kids as I being a criminal
But Beck using his alleged legal counsel to push his malice that there was a basis
for any injunction against me for anything I did in the first place just so he
would hide his criminal acts is the ultimate deception of all trying to exert his
legal skills to do harm and not for honorable reasons but to obstruct justice.
Ron Beck practiced giving legal advice in private counseling and then in actions he
and others took to the courts and he is not a lawyer. He even tried to tell me what I
needed to be doing in my business and that was none of his right to act like he knew
the law and tell me what to do as I was preparing papers to the Courts and his advice
was a fraud but his arrogance and pride as a pastor made his think he had the right to
tell people what to do or he got angry with them. In August 1999, I told him mind his
own business.
He is not allowed to represent a Corporation as he did before Judge Palomino.
Evidence is in the preparation of the affidavits by Ron Beck and Karen Townsend
filed November 2, 2001.
Evidence is in the transcripts of hearings before Judge Palomino by Ron Beck and
Karen Harrod Townsend that reveal his practice of giving legal council to Karen
Townsend and also he acted in violation of law as he represented a Corporation in his
role as pastor.
Evidence is in the transcript of the hearing before Judge Timmerman January 30,
2003 in testimony given by Karen Harrod confirm her directions came from Ron
Beck.
I took this information that Beck was giving false business records and using his
daughters and others to harass my kids and using a sheriff deputy to help him hide the
truth and also harass me and my family on multiple occasions as Deputy Howlett

29

used Becks alleged advise from the hearing of Judge Palomino and the Sheriff offices
at District III, SGT. Paul Guarino and others and at Internal Affairs Several
investigators( Luther Core). I WENT TO INTERNAL AFFAIRS SEVERAL
TIMES. BOTH PINELLAS COUNTY AND HILLSBOROUGH TOLD ME BRING
PROOF FROM THE JUDGE THAT THEIR EMPLOYEE WAS GUILTY. I TOLD
THEM I NEEDED THEIR HELP TO GET ALL THE FINANCE RECORDS SO I
COULD SHOW THE JUDGE AND THEY SAID JUST SHOW THEM PROOF AS
I SHOWED WHAT I HAD! When Howlett attended the November 2001, hearing
and tried to give false testimony, I went to Internal Affairs. I also wrote to the sheriff
himself Cal Henderson and was rudely treated by one deputy of his office staff telling
me to stop reporting these acts by Howlett and other deputies who were listening to
Beck. This deputy threatened me to never come back on the property or he would
arrest me himself for stalking the sheriff as I was asking for help. I went straight
from that encounter to the FDLE and reported the matter to Cynthia Sanz, Special
Agent Supervisor.
THE CHURCH FINANCE SECRETARY MRS, PAULA POWELL IS ALSO A
NOTARY AND SHE NOTORIZED FOR RON BECK HIS AFFIDAVIT USED TO
GET THE TEMPORATY INJUNCTION IN THE COURT OF JUDGE
PALOMION IN NOVEMBER 2001. PAULA POWELL NOTORIZED THIS
AFFIDAVIT EVEN THOUGH SHE NEW IT CONTAINED THE FRAUDS THAT
RON BECK WROTE IN HIS OWN HANDWRITING BECAUSE SHE KNEW WE
WENT TO HIGHSCHOOL TOGETHER!

The references herein to the Florida Rules of Court are the 1993 version printed by
West Publishing.
ONE EXPECTS THIS PROFESSION AND THE PARTICIPANTS BOTH
JUDGES AND LAWYERS TO ACT PER THE CHAPTER 4 RULES OF
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND THE PREAMBLE AND SCOPE SECTIONS
AND ALL SECTIONS THROUGHOUT THE FLORIDA RULES OF COURT!

ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF ATTORNEY DREW A. GARDNER & DAVID

GIBBS III
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT VIOLATED ARE:
RULE 4 --SUBPARTS
-1.2(d); -1.2(e); -1.6(b)(1); -1.7(b); -1.13(d); -1.16(a)(1); -1.16(b)(2); -1.16(b)(3);
-1,16(4); -1.16(d); -2.1; -3.2; -3.3(a)(1); -3.3(a)(2); -3.3(a)(3); -3.3(a)(4); -3.3(b);
-3.3(c); -3.4(a); -3.4(a); -3.4(b); -3.4(c); -3.4(f)(2); -4.1(a); -4.1(b); -4.4; -8.3(a); -8.4(a);
-8.4(b); -8.4(c); -8.4(d)
FLORIDA STATUES VIOLATED; Actions assisted criminal acts of the clients:
817 fraud and credit card crimes; 777 Conspiracy; 836.05 extortion; 837 perjury; 843
Obstruction of Justice; 871.01 & 871.02 Disturbing Religious and other assemblies;
836.11 allowing publication to expose person to hatred; 895 RICO; 458, allowing Dr.

30

Lynn to do medical malpractice; 914.13 and 914.22 and 914.23 Perjury and witness
tampering.
VIOLATING MY FEDERAL AND CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!
FLORIDA STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS
1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.1; 2.5; 2.7; 2.8; 4.11; 4.21; 4.31(a); 4.41(b); 4.51; 4.61; 5.11(b); 5.11(f);
6.11; 6.21; 6.31(a); 7.1; 9.22(b); 9.22(c); 9.22(d); 9.22(g); 9.22(h); 9.22(I); 9.22(j);
12.1(b).
It was the counsel of Drew Gardner who gave Beck the idea that a pastor or a church
is above the law and above the courts as the position of the Christian Law Association
was:
(1) a court did not have jurisdiction over a church and
(2) Christian Church members dont sue other Christian Church members in court
because Church members do not recognize the courts and should handle matters
internally
(3) As he counseled the school when I requested arbitration to stop the lying of the
Senior Pastor and School Pastor and a teacher my wife who were telling me that if I
came to a school function for my kids that Beck would have Howlett arrest me and
Gardner IN GARDNERS REPLY LETTER he said there were not issues to argue
about but his counsel was a pure lie and violation of my right as a parent and member
with an interest that the school was not doing illegal matters sufficient to get closed.
(4) I TOLD HIM TO READ THE PALOMINO TRANSCRIPT AND HE WOULD
KNOW HOW HE WAS PROTECTING AND HELPING HIS CLIENTS
CONTINUE TO DO CRIMINAL ACTS!
(5) THE SCHOOL HANDBOOK had granted me the rights to come to see school
functions of my kids and only because I could prove to people the lies of Ron Beck
and Karen and the other pastors that I was not violent at any time did HOWLETT
HAVE TO BE THE JUDGE JURY AND EXECUTIONER AGAINST ME.
(6) (My cautions of not reporting money to the members led to possible IRS and Florida
Statue violations and the cover up by Meister and Beck led to physical abuse and
mental abuse on my wife and son and daughter and harassments that an employer or
school are not to violate to have a safe environment for learning not abuse including a
daughter that incurred major medical mental needs. I told him to read my letters to
Beck and to Dr. Lynn sent registered mail so he would know the duress and mental
harms his clients were causing to cover for their stealing and hiding the money.
(7) My duties to report misconduct were blocked by the fact that BECK STATES IN HIS
ANSWERS TO HIS INTERROGATORIES TO QUESTION #2 THAT I called the
Christian Law Association (HEREINAFTER CLA) and explained that Randall
Townsend was circling the church repeatedly and waiting for me to leave. I was
advised that Mr. Townsend actions constituted stalking. DREW GARDNER HAD
MULTIPLE acts reported to him by that time that the frauds were being investigated
by me STILL AT THE REQUEST OF MEMBERS THAT HE HAD A DUTY TO
GET THE ANSWERS TO AS THE CHURCH MEMBERS AND NOT JUST THE
PROTECTION OF ONE CORPORATE OFFICER WHO WAS CAUSING ALL
THE ABUSE AND CRIMES AND THE CLA HAD A DUTY TO NOT LIE AND
THEN COVER UP WHEN THEY KNEW THEIR REPUTATION WAS ABUSED
BY BECK AND MIESTER AGAINST THE REST OF THE CHURCH!

31

(8) HE LIED TO ME AS I WAS STILL A CHURCH MEMBER ASKING FOR HIS

COUNSEL!
(9) And there were no proofs of my actions being but as a respectable citizen and church
member reporting additional criminal acts by the pastors in retaliation for their
original acts and per the KOND CASE, DOE v. EVANS MALICKI v. DOE and
others CASES violating every day my civil rights to see my wife and kids and
help them see the additional frauds BECK and MEISTER and others like his
band of illegal sheriffs willing to ignore the fact that over $300,000.00 of missing
money had been proved to have been hidden in the Corporation books by these
alleged pastors and finance committee and also in further violation of protecting
my rights and the rights of my wife and kids! ALSO TODAY EVEN NOW IN
2005 LOOK AT THE NEW PROPERTY ON GUNN HIGHWAY AND NOTE
THAT WHAT I SAID WAS TRUE AND THAT THE BECK PLAN WAS A
FRAUD! Beck saying I was stalking was a created lie! This also shows the BIAS of
THE CHRISTIAN LAW ASSOCIATION to protect a fraudulent pastor abusing
kids and the average church member doing hate crimes at all costs! JUDGE
PALOMINO RULED DIFFERENTLY ONCE THIS FATHER/HUSBAND
SHOWED JUST PARTS OF THE TRUTH! Gardner helped Beck still lie.
(10) NONE OF THE CASES NOTED AND CITED AT THE BOTTOM OF
THIS REPORT HEREIN AND USED BY DENNY AS AN EXTENTION OF
THE POSITIONS TAKEN BY GARDNER OR THE CLA PROTECT THESE
PASTORS FOR ABUSING THESE KIDS AND MY CIVIL RIGHTS AS
THESE ATTORNEYS HAVE NOT HAD THE TRUTH TOLD TO THEM BY
THEIR CLIENTS AND THESE ATTORNEYS HAVE NOT CHECKED THE
PAPERTRAIL TRUTH OF THEIR CLIENT PASTORS TO KNOW THAT
THE PASTORS STILL LIE AND COVER UP ALL THE METHODS OF
EXTORTION THAT THEY STILL DO!
This bought Beck time to do more fraud rather than allow us to get the court or social
services involved immediately knowing the underlying crimes the pastors and officers
and former wife did to continue their lies.
If Beck was not the guilty criminal that he has proved to be and was not covering up the
missing money he knew was fraudulent and had more than me telling his that and his
desire at all costs to build on new property moving the ministry rather than expanding to
adjoining property on the old site the damage from Gardners advice would not have
allowed Beck to continue to add more damages to his original criminal acts or torts and
frauds.
THIS STEP BY GARDNER TOOK AWAY MY FATHERS RIGHTS PER THE
SCHOOL BY-LAWS AND GAVE BECK AND MEISTER THE RIGHT TO SUPPORT
ONLY MY WIFES CARE OF THE CHILDREN WHICH LED TO THE MENTAL
AND PHYSICAL ABUSE OF JENNIFER MISSING SO MUCH SCHOOL(Jennifer told
me they doctored her school records to work it out.) THAT SHE ALMOST DID NOT
HAVE ENOUGH CLASSES TO GRADUATE AND ALSO LED TO HER MISSING
SCHOOL DUE TO HER HEADACHES WHICH REQUIRED SPECIAL
TREATMENTS BY SPECIAL DOCTORS. Dr. HOYOS, JENNIFERS DOCTOR
TOLD ME HER HEADACHES AND ILLNESS WAS DUE TO THE STRESS FROM
THE FAMILY BREAKDOWN AND PRESSURES AT SCHOOL! MY SON

32

SUFFERED STRESS AND ABUSE AND PEER PRESSURE WHEN I TRIED TO

WATCH A SCHOOL SOCCER OR BASKETBALL GAME FROM OFF TO THE
SIDE FAR ENOUGH AWAY THAT BECK COULD NOT HAVE ME ARRESTED AS
HE TRIED TO TELL JUDGE PALOMINO BY BRINGING DEPUTY SHERIFF JOE
HOWLETT TO COURT TO TESTIFY OF MY ALLEGED STALKING EVENTS
INCLUDING MY TRYING TO WATCH MY KIDS IN A SCHOOL SPORTING
EVENT. WHAT KIND OF AN ALLEGED CHRISTIAN SCHOOL CAUSES THAT
STRESS ON A FAMILY AND A STUDENT?
Men of honor following Florida Statues and Biblical resolution principles as stated in
the BY-LAWS for resolution of disputes would have met and dealt honestly with the
issues but Beck and his thieves could not take that exposure of there hiding Church
money and using the extortion and violations of other laws against my wife and kids and
violations to the membership of the Corporation. By hiding me to not expose that they
had 2 or more years NOT of telling the truth he was able to lie and conspire to cover
more.
An attorney is not allowed per his Canon to allow or help his client do more crimes
which the records show many examples of this being fact while Gardner threatened
me with Beck shouting him on to keep the attention off of Becks crimes and
Gardner refused to help me as a Church member get the truth about the
Corporation Books that I still have not seen!
The ECCLESIASTICAL LAW as explained by the recent Supreme Court rulings
do not protect Beck, Meister, Brown, Leatherman, Jeffers, Howlett or the
membership as a whole from their tort actions that violate the law. The Law of the
land is also the language of the Church BY-LAWS conduct which is the written
contract of their ECCLESIASTICAL LAW standing that these members acting for
themselves and for the Corporation as the Corporation were to obey.
Stealing, lying, theft, fraud, extortion and killing a family and harming children go
against all law and the BYLAWS and these are not accepted acts of any religion.
If the position of Gardner and Gibbs was everything the alleged pastors did fell
under the Ecclesiastical Law Standard the this defense should work to all the
Catholic priests who abused children. The abuse and damages these pastors did to
my family and the children is the same when one studies the police reports and the
medical reports and the fact that my children hate me for telling the truth and
confronting the illegal conduct of the alleged honorable mother and pastors and
Scruggs and Turmel and Timmerman using conspiracy to keep the kids quiet.
EXTREME ASSUALT HAS BEEN DONE TO ME AND MY KIDS AND
OTHERS!
Also Gardner was hired by the Corporation and paid with Corporation funds not private
funds of the individuals and therefore had a duty to the Corporation and not the
individuals as of the senior pastor Ron Beck or Herman Meister, or William Brown or
Gary Leatherman or Joe Howlett, or Tim Jeffers as what it shows his advice and actions
to threaten me not to sue as also a member in good standing shows he violated my
rights as a member being the one true to the Corporation and not the Band of
Thieves. Gardner became an accomplice to the crimes of select officers and did not do
yet anything to stop or reverse the damage of the individuals, Beck, Meister, Brown,
Leatherman, Howlett, Jeffers, Giles, Shumate, Nunes, my former wife and others.

33

CHURCH BUSINESS MEETING RECORDS SHOULD REFLECT WHERE

GARDNER SPOKE OPENLY TO THE CHURCH IN A BUSINESS MEETING AND
EXPLAINED HIS OBLIGATIONS TO THE OFFICERS SEPARATE FROM THE
MEMBERS IF HE OBEYED THE FLA BAR RULES OF WHEN HE FOUND
CORPORATION OFFICERS STILL VIOLATING THE LAW. Instead Gardner
conspired with the officers in violation of the membership at large. I can prove these
points in greater detail of Becks frauds. Gardner and David Gibbs, III were given many
updates by me of how their client was in violation of the law and continuing the crimes
Gardner taught him and he did nothing to stop it. Gardner and Gibbs were given several
opportunities to mediate or arbitrate meetings to resolve these legal matters and they
refused to do so but threatened me to stay quiet. They just warned me (VERBALLY
AND IN A LETTER) to stay away from court as a threat and also this allowed the crimes
by the individuals to get worse using their veil as alleged pastors and alleged Sheriff
deputies to work additional crimes behind the scene. The letter also tells me no
violations by the pastors were needing solved. THIS WAS A BOLD LIE AND FRAUD
TO A CORPORATION MEMBER!
THE DURESS AND STRESS AND DAMAGES OF THIS COUNSEL IS EVIDENT IN
THE DIVORCE TRANSCRIPT OF STATEMENTS BY STACEY TURMEL AND
KAREN AND THE TESTIMONY OF DENNY TO JUDGE CRENSHAW!
Gardner and Gibbs had a duty to protect my kids from abuse by the teachers including
their mother and counselors Mrs. Gayle Lynn and Dr. Lynn and alleged Pastor of the
School Herman Meister as the file of my daughter will show abuse by the school.
This is even after I had mailed to several people via mail and registered letters of the
mental and physical duress that they were putting on the family. Dr. Lynn was sent a
registered letter and he refused to comply with my demands as a father even though the
actions were per my rights as the father of the minor children and BAKER ACT concerns
were present regarding the issues with the Karen as the mother also under his treatment.
SUMMARY POINT---LETTERS SENT TO GARDNER AND GIBBS CAN BE
SUPPLIED AS THEY SHOWED EACH LAWYER OF THE BECK VIOLATIONS
AND WARNED THEM OF THEIR DUTY TO ME AND MY ROLE IN LEADERSHIP
TO THE CORPORATION AND GARDNER DID MALPRACTICE OF HIS DUTIES
AND THUS ALLOWED THESE FRAUDS!

34

ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF ATTORNEY CHARLES H. SCRUGGS III

SCRUGGS MUST BE DISBARRED!
ATTORNEY STANFORD SOLOMON SAID IN THE COURT HEARING
BEFORE JUDGE GOMEZ ON AUGUST 16, 2004 AND THE JUDGE AGREED
WITH WHAT STANDFORD SOLOMON SAID AS HE ADDRESSED HEATHER
GRAY NOT WANTING TO BE INVOLVED IN REPRESENTATION OF MY
FULL RIGHTS AS SHE ONLY WANTED TO HANDLE THE APPEAL.
SOLOMON SAID AN ATTORNEY CANNOT LIMIT HIS SCOPE OF
REPRESENTATION. HE SAID, AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A
LIMITED APPEARANCE; ONCE YOU ARE IN, YOU ARE IN.

THEREFORE FOR SCRUGGS TO NOT REPRESENT MY FULL

RIGHTS AND EVEN TO LIE TO ME ABOUT MY RIGHTS AND
THEN WORK EXPARTE TO SABOTAGE MY RIGHTS I DEMAND
HE BE PUT IN JAIL FOR HIS CRIMINAL FRAUD AND ABUSE OF
MY CHILDREN ALLOWING THEM TO SUFFER!
THE MORE I READ THE CASE LAWS AND READ THE RULES OF
CONDUCT AND HOW HE SHOULD HAVE REPRESENTED ME AND MY
DESIRE TO HELP MY KIDS AND NOT VIOLATED MY KIDS OR MY CIVIL
RIGHTS JUST SO HE DID NOT MAKE A CHURCH LOOK BAD AND LIED
TO ME ABOUT MY RIGHTS ------THIS GUY NEEDS PERMANENT JAIL TIME WITH NO OPPORTUNITY FOR
PAROLE DUE TO HIS CONSPIRACY TO HURT HIS CLIENT AND IN
ADDITION TO BEING DISBARRED FOR HIS CONDUCT OF LIES AND
FRAUDS HE DID IN THE COURTS BEFORE SEVERAL JUDGES!
THESE ARE ONLY PARTS OF HIS VIOLATIONS OF LAWS AND CANONS
AND RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CAUSING FRAUDS AND DAMAGES TO
HIS CLIENT AND THE COURTS:
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT RULE 4 --SUBPARTS
-1.1; -1.2(a); -1.2(c); -1.2(d); -1.2(e); -1.3; -1.4(a); -1.4(b); -1.5(a); -1.5(a)(2); -1.6(b)(1);
-1.6(b)(2); -1.7(a); -1.7(b); -1.8(b); -1.9(b); -1.13(d); -1.16(a)(1); -1.16(a)(2); -1.16(a)(3);
-1.16(b)(2); -1.16(b)(3); -2.1; -2.160; -3.2; -3.3(a)(1); -3.3(a)(2); -3.3(a)(4); -3.3(b); 3.3(c); -3.3(d); -3.4(a); -3.4(b); -3.4(c); -3.4(d); -3.4(e); -3.4(f); -3.5(a); -3.5(b); -3.7;
-4.41(a); -4.41(b); 4.4;
-5.1(c); -5.2(a); -8.2(a); -8.3(a); 8.4(a); 8.4(b); 8.4(c); 8.4(d); 8.4(f);
Florida Statues 837 Perjury and 777 Conspiracy and others as also as a former Judge he
had knowledge of additional violations by others and Juvenile Rules 8.675. And of 2.160
he knew the duty Timmerman had to resign and instead Scruggs assisted in additional

35

conspiracy to as he said not make the court any more mad at him in September 2003,
when he was fired.
FLORIDA STATUES; 836.05 Extortion, 843 Obstruction of Justice, 772.102 Pattern of
Criminal Activity, 895 RICO, contributing to 458 allowing Doctor Lynn do Medical
Malpractice, 914.13 and 914.22 and 914.23 Perjury and Witness tampering and more as
shown below.
FLORIDA STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS
1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.1; 2.2; 2.4; 2.5; 2.8; 4.11; 4.21; 4.31(a); 4.41(b); 4.51; 4.61; 5.11(b);
5.11(e); 5.11(f); 6.11; 6.21; 6.31(a)&(b); 7.1; 9.22(b); 9.22(c); 9.22(d); 9.22(g);
9.22(h); 9.22(I); 9.22(j); 12.1(b).
Complainant herein alleges all facts as stated in MOTION FOR REHEARING, filed
October 1, 2003, to the court of Judge Timmerman.
SCRUGGS WANTED ME BLOCKED FROM MY OWN KIDS OR WHAT OTHER
REASON SHOULD SCRUGGS EVEN WRITE TO JUDGE TIMMERMAN ON
OCTOBER 3, 2003, IN HIS PROPOSED JUDGEMENT THAT AN INJUNCTION
CLAUSE WOULD BE NECESSARY DUE TO HIS KNOWLEDGE FIRST HAND IN
THE HEARING BEFORE JUDGE PALOMINO IN 2001, AND HAVING HEARD NO
OTHER REASON FOR THE INJUNCTION BUT BY THE INJUNCTION HE IS
ABLE TO INSURE THAT THIS PLAINTIFF HIS CLIENT CANNOT GET TO THE
CHILDREN AND LEARN MORE OF THE FRAUDS AND DAMAGES DONE TO
THEM AND THEN BE FORE EVIDENCE OF HIS MALPRACTICE FROM NOT
DOING ACTIONS TO HELP HIS CLIENT AND THE KIDS FROM 2001 UNTIL THE
DIVORCE! THIS WOULD ALSO EXPLAIN WHY HE DID NOT PUSH
COUNSELING OR MEDIATION OR A GUARDIAN ATTORNEY OR ANY
DISCOVERY OR COUNTER EVIDENCE OF FRAUDS TOLD TO JUDGE
PALOMINO OR JUDGE TIMMERMAN BUT LET KAREN AND BECK RUN WILD!
Also not all the evidence of his damage may be stated in this section of the report but
may be supplemented in the others sections with whom he contacted and tainted and
conspired with them.
His violation of laws and Canons and procedure was:
1. His tort actions of lying to his client about his clients legal options and legal rights in
2000 and the days of and after the Palomino cases so he did not want to make a
church look bad which he did not confess until July 2003 and in September 2003,
2. in 2000 2003, lying of convictions about "not making a church look bad from me.
3. Trying to think he could satisfy my utmost desire to be with and protect my kids even
from their mother which meant exposing the frauds of the wife and pastor to the
fullest so I could be a dad to my kids. HIS LIES COST ME IRREPLACABLE
YEARS AND CUSTODY OF MY KIDS AND CONTINUED THE MENTAL
ABUSE ON MY KIDS AND ME AND COST MANY LIES TO MANY
JUDGES AND OTHERS!
4. Withholding my reasons from the court of Judge Palomino of why I was being kicked
out of the church and that Beck and Karen were right under the judges nose in
conspiracy to lie so they could hide their continuing criminal acts and Scruggs did
nothing to protect his clients rights or the rights of my kids who records show

36

continued and even to this day to suffer so much trauma as they sort through pastors
and mothers and attorneys in pure outright lies so they can steal money and persecute
a father just who they know is telling truth and trying still to find missing nor possibly
not reported money now up to over $300,000.00.
With that knowledge I would not have hired Scruggs and got another lawyer or I would
have known to get a second opinion much faster in 2000, nor asked him to represent me
still through the divorce because I did not suspect his frauds to me and still not be
confused about many legal things being covered up herein as reported:
to represent me or represent my kids in the matters before Judge Palomino or
in the Divorce case or
relied on his legal advice of as a lawyer in 2000 2003 or
as of his position as a former judge while I just watched and hurt that my kids were
hating me because of how they were brainwashed that I was not following the laws in
trying to help them since 2000.
With Scruggs not doing his duties to help get justice he was obstructing justice and
sending a message to my kids that dad was a liar otherwise the court would protect
our father child relationship.
This caused not solving several matters of my civil rights, fathers rights, childrens
rights and
maybe opened up the eyes of the former wife about Becks frauds before Judge
Palomino and
delayed my helping my children from abuse,
clearing my reputation and
stopping these additional damages incurred by the damages from Beck and then the
issues from the divorce.
5. This as stated in point one and two, has led to many violation and lies of and to his
client and to the courts and to other attorneys as he lets Beck and Karen run wild as
noted above herein which I believe makes him a co conspirator to their acts basically
including extortion on the kids, kidnapping and abuse on children and more
information to be shown of his violations in the Transcripts at trials and hearing and
by the case files showing his lack of proper legal actions and the fraudulent actions
Ex parte and lies to his client he took to protect his personal convictions which
damaged his client and my kids and others including the courts since 2000.
6. SCRUGGS NEVER AGREED WITH ME NOR TOLD ME HOW I COULD DO
IT PRO SE, THAT I SHOULD BE ABLE USING THE COURTS TO HAVE A
DEPOSITION OF MY KIDS DONE ON THE RECORD SO THE COURTS
WOULD KNOW I NEVER HURT OR ABUSED ANY ONE AS NOW THE
FORMER WIFE AND THE PASTORS CHARGE EVEN TODAY AND ALSO
THEY COULD SEE HOW MY KIDS WERE BEING ABUSED BY THEIR
MOTHER AND THE PASTORS AND OTHERS AT THE SCHOOL/CHURCH
AND MY KIDS WOULD BE ABLE TO NOT HAVE THEIR ABUSE
CONTINUED NOW FOR YEARS!
7. EVEN WITH THE DOCTORS REPORTS SHOWING PHYSICAL AND MENTAL
ABUSE ON MY DAUGHTER SCRUGGS DID NOTHING. ALSO THIS WOULD
HAVE ALLOWED ME TO STOP THE LIES THAT THE MOTHER AND THE
PASTOR CONTINUE TO TELL AS HEARSAY AND HERESY.

37

8. Scruggs had outside the court of Judge Palomino my parents to confirm my story of
the violation by Beck and Karen against me and my family and the kids and Beck and
Karens patterns of previous frauds and damage to the kids and he did nothing before
Judge Palomino and then did nothing to advise me that I could seek legal protections
for my kids in other courts so I could be a daddy and get these kids from Meister and
Beck and the mother and out of the pressures of that school who grew to hate me
more each day based on the repeated lying of the pastors and the wife and legal
counsel given to them by Gardner and Gibbs.
SCRUGGS MADE A FAST DOLLAR FOR HIS VERY LIMITED
REPRESENTATION OF ME BEFORE JUDGE PALOMINO AND FOR HIS LYING
TO ME AND FOR NOT EVEN IN FOLLOW UP HELP ME GET MY PROPERTY
BACK THAT HAD BEEN CONFISCATED!
9.When I informed Scruggs that after the November 15, 2001, trials before Judge
Palomino I had finally had a chance to read all the papers surprised on us that Karen and
Beck had produced late even the morning of the hearing to the Judge and read the
Affidavit Beck gave to Judge Palomino and that the Affidavit had at least two major lies
to prejudice the Judge and that I had wrote to Judge Palomino showing the frauds,
Scruggs scolded me for writing the Judge and said he would handle it with Judge
Palomino. I never was told what he did as we talked about it in 2002 nor when I asked
him about it again in 2003. I also never received from Judge Palomino a ruling on the
Sheriffs report sent to him with my school and parade pictures and proofs that Beck had
lied under oath when he wrote he only knew me since 1994, yet pictures of us on the
same football team and working on the Kash n Karry float in the Gasparilla Parade in the
1970s showed Beck would even lie under oath. Beck also knew my path to work took
me by the church and school property. Scruggs had church documents and the letters of
frauds by Beck and others as Beck sat there lying to Judge Palomino in 2001.
Scruggs must have had some type of Ex parte actions with Judge Palomino because
Scruggs then told me that I had to take over my own case and pursue the return of my
property through the courts by myself. This tells me maybe his conduct before Judge
Palomino after Judge Palomino saw the pictures and realized the fraud and incomplete
presentation of a case by Scruggs made Judge Palomino mad at Scruggs because it
seemed like Scruggs went into hiding now that I think about it.
Also now writing this report it makes sense that the response I got from Judge
Palomino when I presented my Motion that the actions by Beck and Karen were SHAM
PLEADINGS would have shown Judge Palomino that Scruggs had presented to the
Judge not the full facts of the case and thus allowed the fraud on the court. Judge
Palomino had a duty to confront Scruggs and advise me of the frauds and his rulings!
10. In the Divorce case I asked again as I had asked in the 2001 case that my daughter be
assigned her own lawyer as the former wife continued to tell hearsay evidence and these
accusations show that the kids are brainwashed but Scruggs did nothing.
SCRUGGS HAD KNOWLEDGE OF ALL THE FACTS AS STATED HEREIN.
11. By Scruggs also refusing to attend the follow up Court meetings with me in my
attempts to get my confiscated property back taken by the Sheriff while enforcing the
injunctions I now believe Scruggs was hiding from his malpractice and frauds on the
court of Judge Palomino.
MORE IN THE JUDGE PALOMINO AREA.

38

SCRUGGS ADVISED ME LEGALLY I HAD NO COUNTER ACTIONS LIKE

CALLING THEIR ACTION A SHAM PLEADING OR FILING A COUNTER
CLAIM TO BATTLE THE LAWSUITS FILED BY BECK AND KAREN IN 2001
OR GET MY LEGAL EXPENSES PAID BY BECK OR KAREN AND
MAINTAINED THAT POSITION AND IN 2003 WHEN I CONFRONTED HIM
ABOUT HIS LEGAL POSITION VERSES MY BEING GRANTED APPROVAL
FROM JUDGE CRENSHAW IN MY CASE AGAINST BECK FOR MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION, HE CALLED JUDGE CRENSHAWS RULING A MISTAKE.
HIS ADVICE TO ME WAS INTENTIONALLY FRAUD SINCE MEETING HIM IN
2000, AS MY LETTERS TO THE CHURCH CONFIRM SCRUGGS LIED AND HIS
FRAUD CONTINUES HARM AGAINST ME AND MY KIDS AND SHOWS
ELEMENTS OF HIS CONSPIRING BY SILENCE AND HIS EXPARTE
ACTIONS TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL HARM TO HIS NOW FORMER CLIENT
TO COVER FOR HIS CONSPIRING TO LIE TO ME, TO JUDGE PALOMINO AND
WITHHOLDING EVIDENCE IN THAT IN 2001 TRIAL WHICH THEN TO JUDGE
TIMMERMAN HE PLEADED HE WAS NOT PERPARED BUT HE WAS AND HAD
ARGUED WITH ME THAT HE DID NOT NEED ANYTHING MORE FROM ME.
Letters in the files show that Scruggs and I spoke on or about January 21-22, 2003, by
phone or even before as I contacted his office right after leaving the court of Judge
Arnold in the hearing with transcript available and filed with the court on JANUARY 21,
2003 and he delayed me all week that he was just going for a motion to delay the final
hearing and it was not my negligence as Scruggs told the Judge as a pure fraud on the
court. Also note that the original hearing was January 29, 2003, and Judge Timmerman
did not show up at chambers due to I think a doctors appointment. When Scruggs and I
spoke upon learning the hearing was rescheduled, I asked him then to meet and do more
prep for the case and he refused and got upset saying I told you to trust my strategy and
I plan to ask for a continuance.
IN WRITING THIS REPORT IT JUST HIT ME THIS MOTIVE THAT SCRUGGS
SEEKING A DELAY TO TIMMERMAN THAT HE DID NOT HAVE TIME TO
PREPARE WAS A TACTIC TO COVER FOR HIS MALPRACTICE THAT IF HE
PUT OFF THE HEARING ON THE DIVORCE UNTIL AFTER NOVEMBER 2003,
THEN HIS MALPRACTICE DONE IN NOVEMBER 2001, WOULD NOT BE AT
ISSUE FOR ME TO SUE HIM THEN IF I KNEW HOW HE LIED TO ME IN 2000
AND LIED TO JUDGE PALOMINO IN 2001 BY FRAUDS TO ME IN 2000, THAT I
HAD NO RIGHTS TO SUE BECK FOR HIS INTENTIONAL DAMAGES TO ME
AND TO MY FAMILY AND TO THE CHURCH! THAT IS WHY HE DELAYED ME
ALL WEEK NOT WANTING TO MEET FROM JANUARY 21-30, 2003!
NOTE SCRUGGS TESTIMONY TO THE COURT IN THE JANUARY 30, 2003,
TRANSCRIPT ON PAGE 8 LINE 17, AS A PURE DECEPTION ON THE COURT
ALLEGING, I just wonder about my status with the bar association representing a man
in trial that I have not had a chance to prepare for. IT WAS NOT AS HE TESTIFIED
BUT HAD BEEN OVER A WEEK AND HIS REFUSAL TO PREPARE! PLUS HE
HAD EVIDENCE RIGHT IN HIS BRIEFCASE THAT HE DID NOT USE! And this is

39

confirmed as a pure fraud that further angered the judge at the client. Later Judge
Timmerman with knowledge as stated in the MOTION FOR REHEARING, October 1,
2003, had a duty to know his prejudice against and punish the client for the frauds the
attorney did and Timmerman had a duty to overturn his rulings and also to report Scruggs
to the Florida Bar but this is proof of their collusion to protect each other at the expense
of Justice, the Townsend family and this complainant and even fraud the court.
Also the facts will show that by phone and letters Scruggs and I spoke several times
between the 2001 case and the divorce case as we talked about the court reporter
check being sent back and forth as my check was returned to me because they did
not know me but had the transcript charged against Scruggs account that then he
told me to pay. Berryhill & Associates invoice 114319 dated 11/30/2001.
The transcript of the Judge Timmerman divorce hearing on January 30, 2003, shows
many frauds by Scruggs and Turmel and the former wife as my Motions and letters show.
Timmerman was prejudice, bias and mad at me from the moment he walked in to
the room! THE VERIFIED MOTION FOR RECUSAL AND TRANSCRIPT
SHOW FRAUDS BY THE JUDGE, ATTORNEYS AND KAREN THROUGHOUT.
AS I JUST HAD IT HIT ME ABOUT THE MOTIVE OF SCRUGGS TO GET
THE HEARING DELAYED IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SCRUGGS ANGERED THE
JUDGE IN THE DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING AS A TACTIC TO GET THE
DELAY SO THE MALPRACTICE WOULD NOT BE UNCOVERED AND THAT
BACKFIRED ON SCRUGGS SO HE MADE IT LOOK LIKE HE DID NOT
HAVE TIME TO PREPARE RATHER THAN A WANT NOT TO PREPARE?
SCRUGGS HAD TRIAL TIME OF JANUARY 29, FOR PREP TIME BECAUSE
THE HEARING TIME WAS CANCELLED AT THE LAST MINUTE.
WHAT HAD SCRUGGS SAID TO TIMMERMAN IN THE DAYS BEFORE THIS
HEARING IN TRYING TO GET A DELAY THAT MADE THE JUDGE UPSET?
Turmel had talked to the judge before the hearing based on comments said before
we went on the record and she had him all prepped that I was an out of control
person for suing a church and trying to have an alleged innocent abused wife fired
and of course she had not read the case then before Judge Arnold as Townsend v.
Beck even though Judge Timmerman was aware of the case nor would she have
gotten the right information from the former wife as she still will not admit that the
pastors did not report over $300,000.00 from 1995 to 1999, was criminal fraud nor
did the former wife want to confess to the criminal acts that she and her mother and
her father had done to abuse the family and the children. Now learning my son
suffers from another cause of her abuse and I cant do nothing is very hard to swallow.
She deserves jail for a long long time! SCRUGGS GOT EVERY DETAIL OF THE
JUDGE ARNOLD RULINGS ON JANUARY 21, 2003, WHICH JUDGE
TIMMERMAN NEEDED TO HEAR TO DISFUSE THE TURMEL FRAUDS!
TO THEN DAMAGE ME AND PROTECT HIS ACTIONS NOTE THE EXPARTE
MEETINGS WITH JUDGE TIMMERMAN (AND GOMEZ STATED OF ONE
HIMSELF IN THE TRANSCRIPT WHEN HE RECUSED HIMSELF) AND THE
JUDGES ORDERS AND AMENDED JUDGEMENTS AS HOW THEY ARE WHAT
SCRUGGS TURNED IN AFTER HE WAS FIRED AND JUDGE TIMMERMAN
KNEW THAT SCRUGGS HAD BEEN FIRED AND THAT THE REASON SCRUGGS
WAS FIRED FOR MAJOR VIOLATIONS INCLUDING ACTS THAT JUDGE

40

TIMMERMAN SHOULD ALSO KNOW WOULD REQUIRE DISBARMENT. Judge

Timmerman after the September 22, 2003, hearing even had his Judicial Assistant bring
out down the hall after we had left chambers the RULES OF CIVIL PROCESS and
pointed her finger right at the rule she said Judge Timmerman wanted me to read! He
wanted me to know I had incompetent counsel.
JUDGE GOMEZ ALSO WAS MADE A VICTIM OF SCRUGGS EXPARTE
ILLEGAL CONDUCT AS NOTE THE TESTIMONY IN THE HEARING WHEN IN
THE TRANSCRIPT RECORD GOMEZ ADMITS SCRUGGS GAVE HIM A
VERSION OF THE CASE AND GOMEZ EVIDENTLY HAD NOT YET READ THE
CASE FILE OR MY VERSION OF THE FACTS UNTIL JUST BEFORE THE
HEARING AND HE KNEW HE HAD VIOLATE EXPARTE RULES AND KNEW
SCRUGGS HAD DONE MALPRACTICE AFTER READING MY MOTIONS IN THE
CASE FILE. SCRUGGS HAD BEEN FIRED AND NO LONGER ABLE TO TALK
ABOUT MY CASE PER THE RULES.
ALSO NOTE THAT HEATHER GRAY CAREFULLY STAYED CLEAR OF
SEVERAL CONFLICT POINTS OF THIS CASE TO JUDGE GOMEZ EVEN AFTER
HER WATCHING THE ABUSE BY THE MATERNAL FATHER AGAINST ME
OUTSIDE THE COURTROOM AND THIS SHOWS SCRUGGS HAD VIOLATED
HER ABILITY TO HONESTLY AND FULLY REPRESENT ME.
ALSO HEATHER GRAY CONTINUALLY USED THE EXCUSE AS TO WHY SHE
COULD NOT WRITE MY APPEAL WAS THERE WAS NO TRANSCRIPT OF THE
SEPTEMBER 2003, HEARING BEFORE JUDGE TIMMERMAN AND THERE WAS
NO TRANCRIPTS OF THE EXPARTE HEARINGS SHE TOLD ME SCRUGGS
TOLD HER HAPPENED WITH THE JUDGE SO SHE WAS HAVING A HARD
TIME RECREATING THE STORY FOR TH E APPEALS COURT BECAUSE OF
TURMELL AND SCRUGGS NOT RETURNING HER PHONE CALLS.
EXARTE ACTS BY SCRUGGS WILL BE DISCOVERED ON OTHERS TO
SHOW HIS INTENTIONALLY CREATED ACTS TO COVER FOR HIS OTHER
FRAUDS.
In the trial of January 30, 2003, Sgruggs did nothing to honor or remind the court
that on the wall outside the court of Judge Timmerman was a NOTICE saying that
no divorce would be granted especially with children involved UNLESS THERE
HAD BEEN MEDIATION AND COUNSELING. The first time any mediation,
arbitration or counseling was ordered was the mediation of August 19, 2005,
Ordered by Judge Sierra to side step her involvement in the deceptions in this case
was to stop overpayments of child support. Repeated attempts to have Judge
Timmermans order corrected have been ignored by Judge Timmerman and Judge
Gomez and Judge Sierra.
All I ASKED FOR IN THE JANUARY 30 2003, HEARING WAS COUNSELING
FOR MY WIFE AND KIDS AND NOTE THE RETALIATION BY JUDGE
TIMMERMAN AND SCRUGGS DID NOTHING!

41

Scruggs violated me again by delaying and never filing properly a MOTION FOR
REHEARING on the DIVORCE trial of January 30, 2003. Nor did Scruggs file the
action to Dismiss the judge against the judge properly.
*****Also based on the actions that Timmerman did, SCRUGGS HAD A DUTY
TO GO TO THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMITTEE and seek actions
for the extreme outrageous conduct by TIMMERMAN.
*****SCRUGGS HAD A DUTY TO GO TO THE FLORIDA BAR AND REPORT
THE FRAUDS PRESENTED BY TURMEL AS HE KNEW THEY WERE
FRAUDS FROM HIS 2001 to PRESENT KNOWLEDGE.
SCRUGGS WANTED ME TO FAIL AND FOR TURMEL TO MAKE ME LOOK
AS BAD AS POSSIBLE AS THIS WOULD HELP HIM HIDE THE
MALPRACTICE!
NOTED IN THE TRANSCRIPT IS A QUESTION BY STACEY TURMEL on page
10, of January 30, 2003 transcript saying, Do you need her to move to the end of
the table? AND LET THE WIFE MOVE CLOSER TO THE JUDGE. WHAT IS
NOT NOTED IN THE RECORD IS AT THAT TIME STACEY TURMEL WAS
WEARING A VERY LOW CUT BLOUSE AND SHE ADJUSTED HERSELF AS
THE QUESTION WAS ASKED! SCRUGGS SAW THIS BIG GRIN BY
TIMMERMAN!
ALL THROUGHOUT 2003, I BEGGED SCRUGGS MANY WAYS TO GET ME
HELP AND HE CONTINUED TO STALL BY BLAMING THE COURT OR
MATTERS OF LAW HE SAID I DID NOT KNOW! OR HE BLAMED TURMEL.
UNTIL the last week of September, 2003, and Scruggs told me no matter what my
wishes were for his representation of me that he was going to do his own plan.
My response was to get up from our meeting in his conference room and tell him he
was fired.
I then quickly went out and wrote the MOTION FOR REHEARING PRO SE of
October 1, 2003, and listed many of the issues of wrongdoing by the former wife,
attorney Scruggs , attorney Turmel and Judge Timmerman.
EVERY ONE KNEW I STARTED MY PRO SE ACTION and then the conspiracy
really took over when one reads the AMENDED FINAL JUDGEMENT and see that
it is generated by SCRUGGS AFTER HE KNEW AND THE JUDGE KNEW HE
WAS FIRED! There are over five judgements and drafts.
Note the MOTION FOR REHEARING THAT IN THE FIRST LINE SAYS, Now
having immediately fired, Respondents former attorney, Charles H. Scruggs, III,
Esquire, for reasons the court is already aware from pointing out in verbal
testimony and from the evidence presented by the Petitioners Attorney that the
court refused to read before ruling in the hearings in this case and for the
MULTIPLE reasons stated herein,
Also note a letter from Stacey Turmel of April 28, 2003, stating here are the exhibits
that had been presented in the rushed trial. Since they left the court with Stacey
Turmel and never to that point been put in the record then the Judge never had a
chance to even read the letters or exhibits that both attorneys asked Judge
Timmerman to take judicial notice of and he agreed to read if he wanted to as Judge
Timmerman argued with Scruggs in the transcript.
THESE FACTS SHOW EXTREME EXTRINSIC FRAUD!

42

There is a letter sent by Scruggs to Turmel that supports me on this point that she
had not for months put the exhibits in the court files and also it points out that she is
delaying just as she had accused me for this wrong doing in the trial. It still took
Turmel over a month to respond to Scruggs letter about the exhibits.
DETAILS OF THE OCTOBER 3, 2003 SUGGESTED AMENDED JUDGEMENT
Note the October 3, 2003, letter from Scruggs also alleged that the list of items
Karen wanted from the home had yet to be produced! So a fraud was presented to
the court as to how urgent the matter was and note that it still was not given to this
husband/plaintiff by the attorneys until 1 st quarter in 2004, over a year later!
SCRUGGS VERSION DOES NOT SAY TO SELL THE HOME! SEE THE EMAIL OF KAREN TO MY SISTER OF FEBRUARY 21, 2005, APOLOGIZING
FOR NOT LETTING US KNOW WHAT ELSE SHE WANTED FROM THE
HOUSE AND THIS IS AFTER A YEARS OF HER ALLEGED EMERGENCY TO
THE JUDGE IN THE DIVORCE HEARING OF JANUARY 30, 2003.
YET BY THE NOVEMBER 18, AMENDED VERSION IT SHOWS THAT
SCRUGGS HAD ADDED SELLING THE HOME INTO HIS AMENDED DRAFT!
Scruggs final draft version of the Amended Judgement ignores his clients version of
the facts presented on the ownership contract partnership of the home and that the
former wife owned nothing. SHE WAS VOTED OUT OF THE PARTNERSHIP
BY HER OWN WRITINGS AND HER OWN AFFIDAVIT!
Scruggs ignores the SIGNED AFFIDAVIT BY THE FORMER WIFE TO JUDGE
PALOMINO in 2001, willingly giving up any money she is owned from the home as
the affidavit says the money belongs to the Townsends her husbands parents due to
the debts she racked up over the 10 plus years.
ONE TIME I EVEN SAT OUTSIDE FAMILY COURT WITH SCRUGGS WHILE
HE WAITED TO GO INTO ANOTHER HEARING FOR ANOTHER CLIENT
AND WE DISCUSSED HOW HE GOT A GUARDIAN ATTORNEY FOR THAT
CLIENT AND HE COULD NOT GET ONE FOR MY DAUGHTER!
WITHHOLDING THE EXTENT OF THE MEDICAL CARE THAT THE DAUGHTER
AND SON NEEDED AND STILL NEED WAS A FRAUD TO THE COURT AND
PROVED THE POSITION THAT JUDGE TIMMERMAN EXPLODED ON THIS
FATHER THAT THE CHILDREN WOULD BE REQUIRED TO GET EXAMS FOR
PRIOR CONDITIONS IN ORDER TO GET INSURANCE WAS MERITED AS
SHOWN IN THE TRANSCRIPT OF JANUARY 30, 2003 on page 58. Over a dozen
reasons can be proved as to why medical and mental evaluations on the former wife and
children are necessary and a court order to honor the request of this father/husband was
the civil action to take.
SCRUGGS TOOK AS LONG AS HE COULD TO DELAY ME AND THEN HE
OPENLY SAID HE WOULD LIE TO ME AND THE COURT ON SEPTEMBER
29-30, 2003 AND I KNEW THEN I HAD TO FIRE HIM AND ALERT THE
JUDGE TO HOW HE HAD BEEN FRAUDED IN JANUARY 30, 2003 HEARING.
BUT NOW IT JUST HITS ME AS I JUST WROTE THAT JUDGE TIMMERMAN
ALREADY KNEW THIS AND COVERED THE MALPRACTICE OF SCRUGGS!
SUMMARY POINTSCRUGGS HAS DONE SO MANY LIES TO HIS CLIENT,
THE COURTS AND OTHER ATTORNEYS BY BEING QUIET HE IS THE
REASON FOR YEARS OF ABUSE SECOND ONLY TO BECK AND KAREN.

43

I DONT KNOW HOW HE SLEEPS AT NIGHT DUE TO THE GUILT HE

SHOULD HAVE ABOUT WHAT HE HAS DONE TO MY FAMILY AND KIDS!
I WILL GLADLY TESTIFY AND PRODUCE THE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY
TO SEE HIM LOCKED UP FOREVER!
HIS CRIMES THAT CAN BE PROVED ARE:
Withholding proper legal advice from his client because of his personal
convictions which damaged his client and his clients family and kids since 2000,
Withholding evidence from Judge Palomino which caused fraud to the court and
damaged his clients case in 2001
Fraud to Judge Timmerman in that he had just been hired and
Fraud to Judge Timmerman by his silence on the previous frauds by the wife
Fraud to his client in again what his personal convictions were and how this
prevented him from presenting his clients defense again in the divorce
His intentional frauds and stalling tactics
His malpractice and negligence in not doing the removal of judge Timmerman
properly
His exparte actions after he was fired to Judge Timmerman in October
December 2004 and maybe here after.
His exparte actions to Judge Gomez as in the transcript of the hearing.
His failure to not report the frauds done by the attorneys and the judges to the
Florida Bar and to the Judicial Qualifications Committee.
His failure to cooperate with Heather Gray for the appeal information!
And still more that I can prove at my trial against Scruggs for malpractice
against his client!
SCRUGGS MUST BE DISBARRED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SCRUGGS NEVER DID REPRESENT THE WISHES OF HIS CLIENT IN 2000,
AS FIRST HE WAS PROTECTING HIS OWN PERSONAL BELIEFS AND
WHEN HE SAW THE DAMAGES THAT THIS CAUSED IN 2001, HEARING
AND IN THE 2003, DIVORCE THEN HE WAS PROTECTING HIMSELF FROM
HIS OWN MALPRACTICE BEING CAUGHT BY HIS CLIENT AND FULL
EXPOSURE TO THE JUDGES!
ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF CHARLES W. DENNY IV and A. JAMES ROLFES
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT VIOLATED ARE:
RULE 4 --SUBPARTS
-1.1; -1.2(d); -1.2(e); -1.6(b)(1); -1.6(b)(2); -1.7(b); -1.13(b)(1-3); -1.13(c)-1.13(d);
-1.16(a)(1); -1.16(a)(2); -1.16(a)(3); -1.16(b)(1); -1.16(b)(2); -1.16(b)(3); -1.16(4);
-2.1; -3.1; -3.2; -3.3(a)(1); -3.3(a)(2); -3.3(a)(3); -3.3(a)(4); -3.3(b); -3.3(c); -3.4(b);
-3.4(c); -3.4(d); -3.4(e); -3.4(f); -3.5(a); -3.5(b); -3.5(c); -3.6(a); -3.7(a); -4.1(a);
-4.1(b); -4.4; -5.1; -5.2; -8.3(a); -8.3(b); -8.4(a); -8.4(b); -8.4(c); -8.4(d); -8.4(f);
Florida Statues 837.02 and Florida Statues 777.011 Conspiracy. Additional Statues are
836.5 Extortion, 837 Perjury, 843 Obstruction of Justice, 772.102 Pattern of Criminal
Activity, 895 RICO, contributed to 458 Medical Malpractice by Dr. Lynn, 914.13 and
914.22 and 914.23 Perjury and Witness Tampering and more as below.
FLORIDA STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS
44

1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.1; 2.5; 2.7; 2.8; 4.11; 4.21; 4.31(a); 4.41(b); 4.51; 4.61; 5.11(b); 5.11(f);
6.11; 6.21; 6.31(a); 7.1; 9.22(b); 9.22(c); 9.22(d); 9.22(g); 9.22(h); 9.22(I); 9.22(j);
12.1(b).
Charles W. Denny IV represents Beck and the Defendants listed in case TOWNSEND v,
BECK et al, CASE # 0203812. This case was filed to prove that Ron Beck the Senior
Pastor had committed fraud and to offset his continuing lies about my reputation and his
damages he was doing to me and my kids as he was blocking by his lying that I was not
allowed to see my kids! This action was necessary to offset his extortion as defined
above herein. IT IS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR DENNY TO REPRESENT
BECK AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND THE CORPORATION OF THE CHURCH AT THE
SAME TIME AS BECKS LIES TO THE CHURCH WILL AFFECT THE JURY
FINDINGS OF DAMAGES!
DENNY has assisted his client continue his frauds on me and his fraud on the court of
first Judge Arnold and then Judge Crenshaw and Dennys actions were used by Turmel to
the Divorce action then hurting Timmerman, Gomez and Sierra.
Denny has been warned several times (my notes specifically show June 24, 2003
outside of chambers) two points-- ***to have a long serious talk with his clients and get his facts straight and quit lying
to the judge with their frauds as his Corporate Officers as clients verses the general
church member are still using conspiracy and will lie more and many of the crimes
they still do had still not been exposed to him or others and that he should double
check all his facts before he continued to represent his clients and present more lies to
the Judges. Denny had to know his client would lie if he read the 2001 case #0115813 before Judge Palomino and know that the case files show Beck lied to get the
Temporary Injunction in the affidavit yet Denny still promotes that Injunction was
necessary even though Beck in the transcript said there was no evidence of physical
abuse or aggression by this Plaintiff. This then gives Denny at least thirty
evidences where his client BECK has lied to the courts. AND MANY MORE
LIES TO his church and to him and to my wife and my kids and done harm to
them. Yet Denny promotes the frauds to Judge Crenshaw that they need
criminal charges brought against me alleging violent acts. NOTE THE FIRST
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENCE FILED OCTOBER 2003, and it is a pure fraud
even misrepresenting the actual directive of Judge Palomino words per the
transcript because Beck and Karen intended to still promote their lies they were
bragging about to everyone and also is proof that what Karen was telling her
attorney Stacey Turmel as her damages she was responsible to cause in the
hearing for the divorce in January 30, 2003!
Denny was shown that I had standing against all the Corporation members based on
the acts of Beck 01-15813 case Beck filed and testimony of Beck in the transcript per
the case of PELLEGRINI v WINTER 476 So 2d 1363 (Fla. App 5 Dist. 1985)
Denny was told to Shepardize his cases as the SUPREME COURT reversed the
positions Denny tried to use in the court of Judge Arnold and then to Judge Crenshaw
and that DENNY MUST GET THE TRUTH FROM HIS LYING CLIENTS TO
KNOW THAT HIS POSITIONS TO THE COURTS WERE NOT BASED ON THE
FACTS FROM THE SUPREME COURTS POSITION ON THE CASES HE WAS
USING AND ALSO FROM THE FACTS FROM HIS CLIENTS BEING LIES!

45

The cases as he presented them to Judge Arnold were not protecting his clients and he
needed to get more facts that show his client was more guilty than he led the courts to
believe or was he intentionally willing to use their fraud. The Malicki v Doe case
#SCO1-179, MARCH 14, 2002 was in conflict with KOND v MUDRYK 769 So. 2d
1073( Fla 4th DCA 2000) and the position of Denny took using the District Court
rulings verses the Supreme Courts later rulings.
I SAID NEITHER OF THESE CASES WERE REDRESS CASES FROM
LITIGATIONS THE CHURCH STARTED ON THE OTHER PERSON AS MY
CASE UNDER MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WAS REDRESS FOR THE
DAMAGES THE ACTION OF THE PASTOR AND THE CHURCH DID TO ME
BY TAKING ME TO COURT AND LYING TO GET AN INJUNCTION!
My statements were put in several MOTIONS that a pastor cannot talk openly bad
about Political officials or the IRS can take away tax status and also a Pastor cannot
just openly libel someone as even the second rate newspapers do not have the right
for open and complete slander. It goes against the nature of what people to expect of
a pastor to go around telling frauds so when they do tell frauds and slander then no
alleged pastor title should protect them. No one has the right to pure slander and
fraud to a court as Beck did before Palomino as the transcript shows and as Scruggs
knew the frauds and had at that point just not informed the court because at that point
Judge Timmerman was in such a bad mood at the divorce trial.
Denny was shown in my Motion that the KOND case does allow the courts to review
if the Church Did follow its BY-LAWS to see that the actions done did follow the
rules in the BY-LAWS and this does not have any problem as the KOND case sees
with the ENTANGLEMENT CLAUSE
Denny was also told that per the Malicki case standard that per the Supreme
Court he had the burden to prove that 6. Constitutional law 84.2Before the
constitutional right to free exercise of religion is implicated, the threshold
inquiry is whether the conduct sought to be regulated was rooted in religious
belief. AT NO TIME DID DENNY DO THIS OR DID JUDGE CRENSHAW
REQUIRE DENNY TO ATTEMPT TO ANSWER MY POINTS TO THIS
ISSUE OF HIM PROVING WHAT HIS PASTORS DID WAS RELIGIOUS OR
ACTS FROM MALICE AND EXTORTION!
Denny was shown how the church financial reports were frauds and he was helping
his client promote extortion on me and my family to cover up for his clients frauds in
not reporting the money and many other acts now including giving false testimony in
an affidavit and verbal testimony to Judge Palomino yet Denny still promoted the lies
after even being given the transcript from the Judge Palomino hearings.
Denny was told face to face outside the first meeting at Judge Arnold court what I
tried to do to expose criminal acts by Beck and the persons named in the lawsuit and
several underlying factors and he continues to use deceptive tactics to evade
production of the documents that show I tell the truth even more than the Church
Business Records already submitted in the court files. Therefore, Denny knowing his
clients have data that will prove additional frauds has blocked production of those
needed Documents and then using false information gains an Order from the Court
that put me in Contempt because I could not get the information from his deceptive
tactics. Denny has been proved to be then in conspiracy to present fraud to the court

46

in violation of Rule 4-3.3. CANDOR TOWARD THE TRIBUNAL. Even now after
the $925.00 was paid, his latest ACTION also attempts to continue to block discovery
now even after the Transcript from the 2001 hearings before Judge Palomino have
been presented that shows his Affirmative Defense is a fraud to the court as are his
verbal statements in open court saying criminal charges were the next step for his
clients. Proving that Beck is still lying about the missing money should go to prove
that he is lying that I must still have an Injunction against me because he is lying of
alleged acts I have done when his is only still running from the law to expose his
extortion and hiding money and lying about stealing from kids.
Scruggs knew of these false accusations by Denny and Turmel as the next step was
criminal charges and refused in the September 2003 conference room meeting to
take action for me to clear my reputation. THIS WOULD EXPOSE HIS 2000-2003
FRAUDS AND MALPRACTICE TO THE CLIENT AND THE COURTS!
Denny is relying on testimony from his client from alleged acts that were back
in 1999-2000 that his clients were told by Judge Palomino were worthless
charges in 2001 yet these Defendants with the coercion of their attorneys
continues to present fraudulent testimony getting an injunction by fraud on the
misrepresenting opposite testimony of a judge! THIS INJUNCTION IS A
FRAUD! It shows how deceptive his clients will lie even before a judge.
Request for Productions of Documents have been ignored and evaded by deceptive
legal maneuvers. These records first requested to Judge Arnold and requested many
times since would lead to more proof for Judge Crenshaw to understand the crimes by
the Defendants and frauds by the attorneys and then for the award of damages.
Perjury by the Defendants and by the Attorneys is throughout these cases and has
been now why judges have violated their duties as they have treated this Pro Se with
not the same level of fairness that they have shown these attorneys presenting frauds.
This information would also give me more proofs to offer to the courts first to
Timmerman and then Gomez and to Sierra and any new court until this is over and my
reputation is cleared so I can have the injunction by Timmerman lifted so I can be a dad
to my kids and stop the lies the former wife and the church pastors have been lying about
since they started these lies many years ago to deflect attention from their criminal acts.
Charles W. Denny IV has also presented fraud to Judge Crenshaw in his verbal
statements of claims that I have made false accusations against his client(saying I
allegedly even calling Beck, Satan) while he blocks the requested documents that
show I am telling the truth.
Denny also has presented fraud in his First Affirmative Defense of October 23, 2003
in total contrast to the transcript from the trail of cases 01-15813 and 01-15814 as
those transcripts were not yet public and Beck and Karen did not know my ordering
of the transcript and it proved that again Ron Beck and Karen Harrod Townsend
being the source of the fraud information by misrepresenting the actual words of
Judge Palomino to many others for years and even to Attorney Denny and to Attorney
Turmel and Attorney Solomon which caused these attorneys to lie to the Judges.
Denny is now with knowledge helping promote a fraud which again hurts me having
the injunction removed and unravel the many frauds and conspiracy that Beck and his
cohorts including my former wife do to continue their frauds and crimes. Had
Timmerman read the case files as he refused to do the fraud would have been

47

exposed! BUT INSTEAD HE LET THE VERBAL POSITION OF TURMEL AND

KAREN BE THE LIE MISREPRESENTING THE ACTUAL TESTIMONY OF
JUDGE PALOMINO IN THE TRANSCRIPT HAD SCRUGGS PRESENTED IT
AND I HAD THE FILES WITH ME AND SCRUGGS KNEW I HAD THEM AND
WAS READY TO EXPOSE THEM BUT SCRUGGS TOLD ME TO WAIT AND
HE WOULD HAVE THE JUDGE REMOVED DUE TO HIS CONDUCT! Then
Scruggs messed up in the motion to have the judge removed!
Denny has also profited from his fraud to the court of Judge Crenshaw in that I had to
pay over $925.00, for allegedly being in contempt of court when in fact based on the
information I know at this time MY ANSWERS WERE TRUTHFUL UNTIL I SEE
DOCUMENTS THAT DENNY FINDS WAYS TO STILL HIDE!
Denny has argued cases that he thought protected his position to protect his clients
and then when additional facts are exposed it shows his client is even more guilty
of violations of additional crimes. He is trying to fit every act his clients still do
under the Ecclesiastical Law yet the BY-LAWS the church allegedly follows
confirm their actions are in violation and the ADDITIONAL TORTS they do are
HATE CRIMES AND RETALIATIONS not allowed under any law.
Even this week on the news it is reported that the IRS is trying to remove the tax
exempt status from a church in Los Angeles because of a sermon presented. So how
does the IRS get around the Denny version of the Ecclesiastical Law allowing these
pastors to do their criminal actions as explained above in the Gardner/Gibbs section.
Denny was alerted to this concern of mine AT OUR FIRST MEETING and thus had
a duty to investigate so he did not present additional fraud to the courts as he was
alerted to the matters that showed his use of several other lawsuits to defend his client
also had those same damaging elements against his client. DOE v. Evans; DOE v.
Malicki; Gracey v. Eaker and the evidence that Beck and Karen had told Judges
Palomino and Timmerman and the records in those files of evidence I had submitted
to those courts and the financial documents presented in the Townsend v Beck case
showing the trail of questions of missing money and then money in the Certificate of
Deposits that showed up after his clients began their lies that I was potentially
violent and dangerous.

SUMMARY POINT: DENNY HAS FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT HIS CLIENTS

HAVE LIED TO HIM AND TO JUDGE PALOMINO AND THEN HE CONTINUES
TO PRESENT THOSE LIES TO THE COURT WILLINGLY NOT AS A DEFENSE
ATTORNEY PRESENTING WHAT MAY BE A QUESTION FOR THE COURT OR
JURY BUT DENNY FULLY KNOWS HE IS LYING TO THE COURT WITH NO
ROOM FOR DOUBT AND HOW THIS CONTINUES THEIR CRIMES AND
EVADE PROSECUTION AND HIM BEING PROVED TO INTENTIONALLY LIE TO
COVER UP FOR THE FRAUDS HIS CLIENTS FIRST TOLD HIM!
DENNY ALSO KNOWING NOW SINCE THE FIRST HEARING BEFORE JUDGE
ARNOLD IN JANUARY 21, 2003, in the transcript of said hearing Judge Arnold said:
ON PAGE 17- Also on defamation, libel, and slander, you have to set forth, with some
specificity, what the libel is, what the slander is. If its written documents, what the
written documents are, attach them to the complaint as an exhibit.

48

ON PAGE 18- THE COURT-And then you file an action for injunctive relief where you
did the same thingreallege everything. And you prayed that the Court order support of
all discovery of documents.
WHAT DENNY IS TRYING TO PROTECT IS MY DISCOVERY OF THE
WRITTEN PAGES THAT HIS CLIENTS HAVE MADE AND PUT IN THE CHURCH
MINUTES FROM BUSINESS MEETINGS TO OUTRAGE NAVE MEMBERS TO
THE MONEY FRAUDS AND NOT RELIGIOUS SERVICES AND THESE
DOCUMENTS WILL SUPPORT TORT CLAIMS BY THIS PLAINTIFF THAT DO
NOT EVEN COME CLOSE TO THE VERY LIMITED EXAMPLES OF THE KOND
CASE!
MAJOR POINT!!!!!!!!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
THE KOND CASE:
WAS NOT A CASE TO SHOW REDRESS FROM A
COURT ACTION BY THE CHURCH AGAINST A PERSON BUT IN THIS CASE I
AM REDRESSING A COURT ACTION BY THE PASTOR, MY FORMER WIFE,
AND THE CHURCH MEMBERS THAT WERE EVEN IN THE COURT READY TO
TESTIFY AS CHURCH MEMBERS AND THE CHURCH TRUSTEE ALSO AS THE
SHERIFF DEPUTY WHO WITH HIS TESTIMONY BEFORE JUDGE PALOMINO
WAS THERE TO TESTIFY AND THE TESTIMONY REPORTED TO THIS
PLAINTIFF FROM THE OWN WORDS OF THIS DEPUTY WERE GOING TO BE
FALSE AND FRAUDULENT AND PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY TO JUDGE
PALOMINO.
MY CASE AS ALLOWED TO STAND IS A MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CASE TO
REDRESS THE ORIGINAL ATTEMPT OF THE FRAUDULENT INJUNCTION
BECK AND THE CHURCH MEMBERS TRIED TO GAIN BY PERJURY AND
FRAUD AND TORT ACTIONS AND SLANDER AND LIBEL!
Per the FLORIDA SUPREME COURT as REDRESS FOR MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION TO PROVE MALICE AND PROVE OUTRAGEOUS AND
ODIOUS CONDUCT NOTE THE FOLLOWING:
Matthew Bender & Co. Inc. (Rel.16-1/97 Pub. 565) FLORIDA TORTS Section on
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION Section 22.
This Publication quotes the use of Pellegrini v. Winter 476 So2d 1363 (Fla. 5th DCA
1985) and other cases and also states that same publication in the section for:
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS.
THE COURT OF JUDGE CRENSHAW HAS NOT ALLOWED THIS PLAINTIFF TO
GET DISCOVERY OF THESE PAPERS REQUESTED SINCE THE JANUARY 21,
2003, HEARING ACKNOWLEDGED BY JUDGE ARNOLD!
POINT ONE-----These actions by Judge Crenshaw have ignored many pleas of this
Plaintiff and as told the judge in hearings that this Plaintiff while he does not give up his
right to pursue individual new actions against these persons which may fall outside of the
alleged protected utterances as of KOND it is believed that these actions by this church as
an AT LARGE and as select individuals will prove the OUTRAGEOUS AND
ODIOUS that go way beyond the very frail argument of KOND and allow this
DEFENDANT TURNED PLAINTIFF to show just cause of action that goes to the
extreme action much more damaging than KOND that would allow TORT LAWSUITS

49

FOR LIBEL AND SLANDER AND PROOF OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS and PAIN
and MENTAL ABUSE AND TRAMA on me and my kids!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
POINT TWO-----KOND was not a case of REDRESS AS DEFENSE OF THE
ACTION THAT THE CHURCH CAME BEFORE THE COURT OF THEIR OWN
FREE WILL AND SUED KOND AS MY CASE IS REQUIRING DISCOVERY OF
SPECIFIC AS STATED DOCUMENTS.
POINT THREE---AFTER NOW SPEAKING WITH A CIVIL RIGHTS
ATTORNEY IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE IT IS CLEAR THAT
THE ACTS BY DENNY AND JUDGE CRENSHAW EVEN TRYING TO LET
THE CHURCH AT LARGE MEMBERS AND THE CHURCH AS A
CORPORATION HIDE BEHIND THESE CASES OF KOND AND MALICKI IT
IS CLEAR ABUSE OF MY CIVIL RIGHTS INTENTIONALLY BY THEM NOT
THAT MY COMPLAINT WAS NOT DETAILED FOR THE COURT OR THAT
THEY DID NOT ALLOW RECOVERY BUT THIS ATTORNEY AND JUDGE
DOING THIS IS A STALLING TACTIC AND JUST ALLOWING THE ABUSE
TO CONTINUE AGAINST ME AS THE ATTORNEYS TELL THE PASTOR
AND THE CHURCH THINKS THEY CAN NEVER BE SUED FOR THEIR
HATE CRIMES THEY CONTINUE TO PRACTICE FROM 1996 TILL TODAY
AS THE INJUNCTION IS A CONTINUING DAMAGE OF THE HATE CRIME
ACTS STARTED IN 1996 BY RON BECK WHEN HE WAS ABOUT TO BE
EXPOSED FOR HIS INTENTIONAL ACTS OF FRAUDS! JEFFERS
CONTINUED THESE ACTS OF FRAUDS AND NOT REPORTING THE
MONEYS AND THEN VIOLATED HIS SHERIFF UNIFORM AND STARTED
ADDITIONAL ACTS OF FRAUD AGAINST THIS PLAINTIFF!
MY REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONS ARE FOR MY DEFENSE FROM MY
DAMAGES FROM THEIR FILING THEIR FREE WILL LAWSUIT AGAINST
ME AND TO PROVE TO JUDGE CRENSHAW THAT IT WAS NOT JUST
BECK IN THAT COURTROOM BUT IT WAS THE ENTIRE CHURCH WITH
HIM AS THEIR PASTOR THERE TO MURDER MY REPUTATION SO THAT
THEIR VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA STATUES CANNOT BE PROSECUTED
BY THE STATE AS CRIMINAL FRAUDS AND ALSO ALLOWING ME TO
SHOW THE EXTENT OF THE NECESSARY PROOFS FOR OUTRAGEOUS
AND ODIOUS EXTREME CONDUCT! I HAVE SUFFERED THEIR HATE
CRIMES NOW FOR MANY YEARS DUE TO THE FRAUD OF ATTORNEY
GARDNER, GIBBS AND DENNY AND THEIR LAW FIRMS!
ALSO FOR MR. DENNY WHEN THE RULING OF JUDGE CRENSHAW WAS
APPEALED AS TO RELEASING SEVERAL DEFENDANTS FROM THE
LAWSUIT, MR. DENNY THEN PRESENTED FRAUD TO THE APPEALS
COURT AND THEIR RULING WAS THE CASE WAS UNTIMELY!
EVEN THOUGH THE REASON WAS CLEAR THAT WITH MOVING THE
COURTHOUSE IN TAMPA THE CLERK ADVISED THEY WERE BEHIND ON
THEIR FILING MY FEBRUARY 3, 2004, papers. THE CLERK ADVISED THIS
PLAINTIFF ON FEBRUARY 10, 2004, THAT THE FILE HAD NOT BEEN
RECEIVED SO PLAINTIFF GAVE THE CLERK A NEW COPY SINCE THE
MAIL DUE TO THE MOVING HAD NOT BEEN PROCESSED!

50

THE APPEALS COURT THEN DID NOT HONOR THE UNINTENTIONAL

ERROR BY THE FILING CLERK AND DENIED THE APPEAL AS BEING
UNTIMELY!
HERE AGAIN WE HAVE A GAME OF TRICKERY BY JUDGES AS THAT
THIS PLAINTIFF DID NOT DO ERRORS AS THE JUDGES WANT TO
MISREPRESENT PURE FACTS AND WITH BIAS ALWAYS TREAT THIS
PLAINTIFF AS AN INCOMPETENT LITIGANT!
MAJOR POINT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT IS ALSO EVER MORE CLEAR NOW THAT THE PREJUDICE OF THE
COURT AND INTENTIONAL ABUSE BY THE ATTORNEYS AND THE
JUDGES TO NOT ALLOW THIS PLAINTIFF TO DEFEND HIMSELF
AGAINST NOW HATE CRIMES THAT STARTED BY A SENIOR PASTOR
WHO ABUSED HIS CHURCH OPENLY IN A CORPORATION BUSINESS
MEETING NOT A RELIGIOUS CEREMONY OR MEETING BUT IN THE
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES AS SHOWN ON APRIL 28, 1996 AND OTHER
MEETING MINUTES OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS EVEN THROUGH THE
DEMAND MADE IN SEPTEMBER 1999 OF SHOW ME THE MONEY, NO
MORE EXCUSES (which discovery being blocked by Gardner then Denny will
show Beck still frauds and lies) AND THEN LIED TO HIS CHURCH MEMBERS
AND THIS INVESTIGATOR/PLAINTIFF AND THEN THESE CHURCH
MEMBERS IN THE LATE 1990s AND TO THIS DAY CONTINUES HATE
CRIMES AND ABUSE ON THIS INVESTIGATOR/PLAINTIFF WHEN
PLAINTIFF WAS ASKED TO FIND THE MONEY? AND THEN ABUSE AND
DISTROY HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH HIS CHILDREN DUE TO THE
CRIMINAL ACTS OF A HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPUTY JOE
HOWLETT ALSO AS A TRUSTEE OF THE NOT FOR PROFIT
CORPORATION BEING DISLOYAL TO HIS SHERIFF UNIFORM AND AND A
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEMBER TIM JEFFERS ALSO AS A PINELLAS
COUNTY SHERIFF DEPUTY ALSO VIOLATING THE OATH OF HIS
UNIFORM JOINED WITH THE PASTOR ON SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 AND
PUBLICLY STARTED THE ALLEGATIONS THAT THIS PLAINTIFF HAD A
STRESS RELATED BREAKDOWN AND WAS DANGEROUS WHILE IN
CONSPIRACY THIS ALLEGED PASTOR AND HIS CO CONSPIRATORS
HOWLETT AND JEFFERS TIRED TO QUIETLY EXPOSE PARTS OF THE
HIDDEN MONEY WHILE PLAINTIFF WAS BEING BANNED FROM THE
PROPERTY BY DEPUTY HOWLETT USING HIS SHERIFF DEPARTMENTS
CAR TO OPENLY PRESENT ALTERCATIONS THAT PLAINTIFF WAS
ALLEGEDLY SHOWING ACTS OF STALKING AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
THAT EVEN ATTORNEY DENNY USED TO THE COURT OF JUDGES IN
TOTAL VIOLATON OF THE UNDER OATH TESTIMONY OF BECK TO
JUDGE PALOMINO AND THEN THESE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES
WILLING AT ANY MOMENT TO IGNORE THAT THIS PLAINTIFF HAS NOT
VIOLATED ANY LAW REQUIRING JUDGE PALOMINO TO ORDER ANY
INJUNCTION BUT THEN LYING BY THESE SAME DEFENDANTS AND
THEN LYING BY ATTORNEYS AND LYING BY JUDGES ALL HAVE

51

CONTINUED TO PRACTICE ABUSE AND HATE CRIMES AGAINST THIS

PLAINTIFF AND THEN SO THESE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS CAN COVER
UP THEIR OWN LYING AND FRAUD AND MALPRACTICE PLACE ON THIS
PLAINTIFF AN INJUNCTION THAT IS SO LOOSELY WRITTEN FOR THE
BENEFIT OF THE EXTORTED AND ESSTRANGED FORMER WIFE AND
THESE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES THAT HAVE CONSPIRED WITH HER
THAT THIS PLAINTIFF FATHER IS SCARED TO DEATH THAT AGAIN
BASED ON THE INSAIN ACTS OF THE FORMER WIFE AND HER NEW
CRIMINAL FRIENDS ALLEGED PASTORS AND SHERIFF DEPUTIES AND
THESE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS THAT IF SHE WANTS TO CREATE
ANOTHER LIE ALLEGEDING THE FATHER ABUSED THIS DAUGHTER OR
SON OR HER THAT THESE EVIL JUDGES WILL SEND PLAINTIFF TO JAIL
FOR NO REASON AGAIN BUT BECAUSE THEY HAVE OVEREXERCISED
THEIR ALLEGED RIGHT TO BE CRIMINAL BUT WEAR ROBES! NO ONE
THINKS A CHURCH SHOULD BE THIS FULL OF HATE CRIMES TO HURT
AN INNOCENT MAN SAYING SHOW ME THE MONEY AND NO ONE
EXPECTS A JUDGE TO BE SO FULL OF HATE TO HURT AN INNOCENT
MAN BUT THESE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES!
THESE ACTS BY PASTORS, SHERIFF DEPUTIES, GARDNER, GIBBS,
DENNY, SCRUGGS, TURMEL, SOLOMON, TIMMERMAN, CRENSHAW,
GOMEZ, SIERRA AND THE APPEALS COURT IGNORING THE FILING
DEADLINE WAS MET AND THEN ALLOWING HEATHER GRAY TO ABUSE
HER CLIENT AND HAVE THE DIVORCE APPEAL DISMISSED SO THE
APPEALS COURT CAN SIDE STEP THIS ABUSE AND THEN FOR JUDGE
SIERRA AND JUDGE CRENSHAW TO CONTINUE TO ROADBLOCK THIS
PLAINTIFF WHILE THIS INJUNCTION AND THE ALLEGED CHURCH
STILL PRACTICES THEIR HATE CRIMES IN THE COURTS AND ON
PUBLIC STREETS MEANS ALL OF THESE PEOPLE SHOULD BE
DISBARRED AND PUT IN JAIL! THIS IS SUPPOSE TO BE A CIVIL LEGAL
SYSTEM NOT RUN BY JUDGES WHO USE FRAUD TO KEEP THEMSELVES
FROM BEING PROVED TO HAVE DONE MALPRACTICE AND FRAUD!
THE FACTS OF THIS CASE PROVES THE ORGANIZED CRIME OF THESE
DEFENDANTS, ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES IN AN ALLEGED CIVIL LEGAL
SYSTEM.
FROM THE LIES STATED BY THE PASTOR IN OPEN COURT BEFORE JUDGE
PALOMINO I MUST AS JUDGE CRENSHAW AND JUDGE ARNOLD STATE
PROVE THE CHURCH SUPPORTED BECK IN THE COURT OF PALOMINO THAT
DAY IN 2001!
I SEEK TO PROVE UNDER REDRESS FROM THEIR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
THAT THE MALICE AND TORT ACTIONS WERE SHOWING THE KNOWLEDGE
AND THE STILL TORT ILL WILL THAT THIS PASTOR AND THEN THESE
CHURCH MEMBERS AND AT LARGE OTHER MEMBERS INTENDED TO
IGNORING THE ACTIONS THAT THIS PLAINTIFF WAS ASKED BY THESE
SAME PERSONS TO DO FOR THEM TO FIND THE HIDDEN MONEY THAT
BEFORE THIS PLAINTIFF WAS ALLOWED TO PRESENT HIS FINDINGS TO THE
MEMBERS AT LARGE THAT THEN THIS PASTOR AND THE TRUSTEE AND

52

THE FINANCE COMMITTEE WITH THE PASTORS STAFF AND PERSONAL

FAMILY DID THEN START NEW FRAUDS, TORT ACTIONS, AGAINST
PLAINTIFFS WIFE AND KIDS AND THEN THESE SAME CHURCH MEMBERS
BEFORE PLAINTIFF WAS EVER ABLE TO GIVE HIS FULL PROOFS OF THE
NOW DISCOVERED OVER $300,000.00 that was not per Florida Statues being
reported as officers of a not for profit corporation and the corporation books by the
statement presented even to the courts from the words of the SCHOOL PASTOR
HERMAN MEISTER THAT THE CHURCH/SCHOOL RECORDS WERE NOT
BEING DONE LEGALLY PROVING MONEY WAS MISREPRESENTED!
SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTS WERE PUT ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL
COMPLAINT FILED IN APRIL 2002 TO PUT THE ATTORNEYS AND
COURTS ON NOTICE OF THE CRIMINAL FRAUDS BEING DONE BY THE
PASTOR PER HIS JULY 26, 2001, LETTER!
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS WERE PUT IN THE EXHIBITS TO THE COURT IN
THE TOWNSEND v BECK CASE ON DECEMBER 18, 2002, AND MAILED TO
ATTORNEYS FOR BECK AND THE CHURCH, DENNY, SHOWING THE
CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF BECK AND SELECT CHURCH MEMBERS! THESE
DOCUMENTS WERE ALSO REVIEWED WITH ATTORNEY SCRUGGS IN
NOVEMBER 2001!
SCRUGGS HAD WRITTEN AND VERBAL AND VISUAL PROOFS HIS CLIENT
WAS A VICTIM OF PASTORS AND SHERIFF DEPUTY AND OTHER CHURCH
MEMBERS FULL ABUSE BECAUSE HOWLETT MEISTER AND THE
ESTRANGED WIFE EVEN CAME TO THE COURT OF JUDGE PALOMINO TO
GIVE FALSE TESTIMONY!
EVERY ACT BY DENNY FROM THAT POINT SHOWS HE HAD SUFFICIENT
KNOWLEDGE AND IN EVEN PREVIOUS MEETINGS BETWEEN THIS
PLAINTIFF AND DENNY BEEN GIVEN SUFFICIENT VERBAL AND WRITTEN
PROOF THAT HIS ACTIONS WERE HELPING HIS CLIENTS PRACTICE
CRIMINAL ACTS THEY STARTED AGAINST AN INNOCENT PLAINTIFF JUST
SAYING SHOW ME THE MONEY HE WAS ASKED TO DO AS AN OFFICER IN
THE CORPORATION!
I HAVE CLEARLY IN MORE DETAILS THAN JUST THIS SHORT PARAGRAPH
ABOVE SHOWED THE COURT OF JUDGE CRENSHAW THESE POINTS AND
MANY TIMES EXPLAINED DAMAGES AND TORTS DONE BY THESE CHURCH
MEMBERS EVEN NOW MY FORMER WIFE IN THE ACCUSATIONS USED IN
THE COURT OF JUDGE TIMMERMAN WHO USED BECKS ACTIONS TO ANGER
AND FRAUD JUDGE TIMMERMAN AND I EXPECT TO BE ALLOWED UNDER
FLORIDA LAW TO REDRESS THE FRAUDS THAT THESE PASTORS AND
CHURCH MEMBERS STARTED WHEN THEY FILED FOR THE INJUNCTION
AND DIVORCE AGAINST ME! I WANT TO EXPOSE THEIR HATE CRIMES AND
TORT ACTIONS AGAINST ME EVEN WILLINGLY USING FRAUD TO JUDGE
TIMMERMAN AND JUDGE PALOMINO.
DENNY IN HIS LATEST ATTEMPT TO BLOCK DISCOVERY IN HIS

53

OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO PRODUCE, of September 16,

2005, again shows multiple issues of fraud by his statements and attempting to tell
the judge by allegedly reminding the judge of her own alleged actions which she has
not done as stated but in April 2004 said replead to show how the Church and
individuals have been involved so she may rule then if the Malicious Prosecution
should extend to the Church At LARGE and possibly then to select members as
stated in the lawsuit or others that still can be named as DEFENDANTS! UNTIL
THE JUDGE ALLOWS THEM TO BE ADDED I AM STUCK AND STOPPED AS
SHE RULED UNTIL I HAD PAID THE $924.00!
THE AMENDED PLEADING filed per the court within 20 days was filed APRIL
19, 2004 as advised and then the court based on the sanctions she said I had to pay
put all matters of this case on hold until the $924.00 was paid.
THE ISSUES BEFORE THIS COURT as to if now this Plaintiff still being not given
yet one document that had been requested since the court of Judge Arnold and now
requested through productions and through requests for sanctions motions and
showing how these documents will prove for Judge Crenshaw that the entire church
helped and supported Beck doing OUTRAGEOUS AND ODIOUS conduct even
to the point of their frauds to Judge Palomino being used in the court of Judge
Timmerman with the same frauds Denny stated in his FIRST AFFIRMATIVE
DEFENSE to Judge Crenshaw has led to the injunction that Timmerman did that
has kept me from my kids now as a father with full rights that the church and a
trustee out of control deputy from my kids now for over 3 YEARS of not being able
to see my kids and they are now 20 and 22 years old and this started as lies by Beck
when they were 10& 12.
BY ATTEMPTING TO BLOCK THESE NECESSARY PAPERS AS
REQUESTED IN 2003 and BEFORE TO SCRUGGS TO GET IN 2001 so to
present to Judge Palomino ---DENNY IS PROTECTING HIM AND HIS FIRM
AND HIS CLIENTS FROM SANCTIONS AND PROOFS OF HIS FRAUDS ON
THE COURT WHICH HAS ALLOWED HIS CLIENTS TO CONTINUE THEIR
FRAUDS AND DAMAGES AGAINST THIS PLAINTIFF AS THEIR HATE
CRIMES STILL HAPPEN IF I WALK DOWN THE MALL OR TO THE
POST OFFICE!
DENNY CONTINUED WHAT GARNDER SAID AND HAS HIS CLIENTS
BELIEVING BECAUSE WE WERE JOINT CHURCH MEMBERS THAT THEY
CAN NEVER BE SUED FOR DAMAGES FROM THEIR LIES FRAUDS HATE
CRIMES AND DURESS AND LIBEL AND SLANDER THAT THEY STILL DO
NOW FOR 10 years!
Denny had a duty to review the Judge Palomino case files before he told his frauds to the
court of Judge Arnold and then to Judge Crenshaw. THIS WILL INFORM DENNY
THAT BECK:
HAD NO CAUSE TO BRING THE LAWSUIT AGAINST ME in the first place
AND
IT WAS DONE AS AN ACT TO HIDE THE FACT THAT BECK HAD THINGS
TO CONTINUE TO HIDE FROM LEGAL PROCESS.

54

HAD ALREADY IN THE AFFIDAVIT AND IN THE COURT TOLD LIES TO

JUDGE PALOMINO

.
FROM WHAT WAS FIRST FILED WITH THE COURT DENNY WAS ABLE TO SEE
RECORDS THAT SHOWED HIS CLIENT IS A LIAR AND PRACTICES
DECEPTIONS WHICH IS NOT WHAT A PASTOR DOES!

THE CHURCH BUSINESS RECORDS THAT I HAD ALREADY PRESENTED

TO THE COURTS SHOW THAT BECK WAS NOT GIVING THE CHURCH
CORRECT BUSINESS RECORDS HIDING OVER $300,000.00, IN VIOLATION
OF FLORIDA STATUES AND THE CHURCH BY-LAWS!
DOCUMENTS REQUESTED FROM BECK WILL SHOW HE WAS TAKING
EXTENDED VACATIONS AND CHARGING THEM TO HIS CHURCH CREDIT
CARD ALSO A VIOLATION AND WILL SHOW ADDITIONAL ISSUES IN
PUTTING MONEY BACK INTO THE BUSINESS REPORTS AND WILL SHOW
WHO WAS INVOLVED AND HELPED BECK PULL OFF HIS CRIMES!
***NOTE THAT DENNY NOW HAS BLOCKED OR REFUSED TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS NOW AFTER I HAVE REQUESTED THESE DOCUMENTS MANY
MANY TIMES NOW SINCE FILING THE ORIGINAL LAWSUIT IN 2002.
***NOTE BEFORE THE FIRST LAWSUIT WAS TOLD TO BE REFILED THE
REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS HAVE BEEN IGNORED BY DENNY AS DENNY
KNOWS HIS REQESTS FOR ADMISSIONS POSITIONS WERE AND ARE A PURE
FRAUD TO THE COURT BECAUSE HE HAS LEARNED NOW THAT HIS CLIENT
IS A PURE LIAR ON EVERY DEFENSE HE HAS AND HE HAS KNOWN THIS
BUT STILL DURING 2004 PRESENTED MANY FRAUDS TO JUDGE CRENSHAW.
DENNY ACTIONS HAVE BEEN PURE ATTEMPTS TO DELAY AND ADD
HARMS AND ALLOW HIS CLIENTS TO CONTINUE THEIR FRAUDS AND
EVADE PROSECUTION FOR THEIR CRIMINAL ACTS THAT IF THEY WERE
NOT A CHURCH WOULD GET SEVERE PRISON TIME!
ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF STACY TURMEL
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT VIOLATED ARE:
RULE 4 SUBPARTS
-1.1; 1.2(d); -1.2(e); -1.6(b)(1); -1.7(a); -1.7(b); -1.16(a)(1); -1.16(a)(2); -1.16(a)(2);
-1.16(a)(3); -1.16(b)(2); -1.16(b)(3); -2.1; -3.2; (all parts)-3.3; -3.4(b)(c); -3.4(a);
-3.4(b); -3.4(c); -3.4(d); -3.4(e); -3.4(f)(1)-(2); -3.5 most; -3.7; -4.41(a); -4.41(b); 4-4; -5.1(c); -5.2(a);
RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION- 2.060(1).
Florida Statues 777 Conspiracy and 837 Perjury and 843 Obstruction and 772.102 Pattern
of Criminal Activity and 895 RICO, and assisting a Doctor with 458 Medical Malpractice
and 914.13 and 914.22 and 914.23 Perjury and witness tampering and more as shown
below.
FLORIDA STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS
1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.1; 2.2; 2.4; 2.8; 4.11; 4.21; 4.31(a); 4.41(b); 4.51; 4.61; 5.11(b); 5.11(e);
5.11(f); 6.11; 6.21; 6.31(a); 6.31(b); 7.1; 9.22(b); 9.22(c); 9.22(d); 9.22(g); 9.22(h);
9.22(I); 9.22(j); 12.1(b).

55

Complainant herein alleges all facts as stated in MOTION FOR REHEARING, filed
October 1, 2003, to the court of Judge Timmerman as.
-1.1; ALLEGEDLY TURMEL WAS REPRESENTING THE DAUGHTER JENNIFER
ALSO AND IN TESTIMONY TO JUDGE TIMMERMAN MADE
REPRESENTATIONS WHICH VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE MINOR
DAUGHTER ADVERSE TO THE FRAUD PRESENTED BY THE MOTHER.
Turmel by not allowing this father to see his daughter or counsel with his daughter
subjected the minor to brainwashing and mental and physical and emotional abuse by the
mother and her employer and the mothers family confirmed by Doctors reports and
violent outrages as shown by the grandfather Don Harrod, before Heather Gray and
Stanford Solomon outside the court of Judge Gomez and as stated multiple times by this
father that the maternal parents prohibited this father from the court ordered contacts
which were frauds and abuses in the first place as was told to Judge Gomez. The minor
daughter and minor son at that time had been brainwashed and confused since the ages of
10-12 by the pastors of the school/church as the Senior Pastor started his plan to ridicule
the father so this alleged pastor could get control of the building program and hide money
as stated above herein and also the additional brainwashing to discredit this father as
stated herein. I had also told Curtis Baughman that the mother had abused the children.
WITHHOLDING THE EXTENT OF THE MEDICAL CARE THAT THE DAUGHTER
AND SON NEEDED AND STILL NEED WAS A FRAUD TO THE COURT AND A
FRAUD TO THIS PRO SE REPRESENTING TRUTH AND PROVED THE POSITION
THAT JUDGE TIMMERMAN EXPLODED ON THIS FATHER THAT THE
CHILDREN WOULD BE REQUIRED TO GET EXAMS FOR PRIOR CONDITIONS
IN ORDER TO GET INSURANCE WAS MERITED AS SHOWN IN THE
TRANSCRIPT OF JANUARY 30, 2003, on page 58. Over a dozen reasons can be
proved as to why medical and mental evaluations on the former wife and children are
necessary and a court order to honor the request of this father/husband was the civil
action and legally required action to take.
MAJOR POINT---WHEN I TOOK OVER AS PRO SE THE ACTS DONE BY
THE FORMER WIFE AND BY STACEY TURMEL AND SCRUGGS AND
STANFORD SOLOMON LYING TO THE JUDGE AND ME THAT HE WOULD
HELP ME LEARN WHO THE DOCTORS WERE THAT WERE TREATING MY
KIDS AND TO BLOCK ME FROM MY DAUGHTER AND DISCOVERY OF
THE EVIDENCE OF HER BEING ABUSED BY THE MOTHER AND THE
CHURCH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES WAS A VIOLATION OF THE FLORIDA
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND NOT ALLOWING IN EVIDENCE THAT
PROVES THE FRAUDS BY THE DEFENDANTS AGAINST ME. THE PROPER
TESTIMONY OF THE DAUGHTER AND SON WILL PROVE THE FRAUDS OF
THE MOTHER, THE ATTORNEYS AND THE CHURCH /SCHOOL PASTORS AND
OTHER EMPLOYEES AS THESE KIDS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED!

PER R.O.C.P 4-3.4(a) ALL ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES,

DEFENDANTS AND DOCTOR LYNN, HAVE (a)
UNLAWFULLY OBSTRUCTED ANOTHERS PARTYS
ACCESS TO EVIDENCE. THE DAUGHTER AND SON
56

ARE EVIDENCE OF THE ABUSE THIS PRO SE FATHER

IS TRYING TO REPORT, STOP AND REPAIR NOW SINCE
1995 by the mother and the pastors. Ignoring me and then
putting injunctions on me so the mother can hide her criminal
violations of these children is abuse of law and my civil rights
as a father.
LETTERS as back up to my verbal requests also show I asked Scruggs to get my
daughter a Guardian attorney to protect her but he never acted per my demands. And I
allege this shows a conspiracy with Turmel to hide their frauds and negligence against the
children even since 2001 before Palomino continuing through Timmerman and Gomez.
The minor daughter cannot know that her alleged position per the counsel of the mother
and Turmel would contribute to fraud on the court.
BY BLOCKING ME KNOWING THE LOCATION OF MY DAUGHTER AND EVEN
TALKING TO HER THEN I WAS BLOCKED FROM GETTING HER A GUARDIAN
ATTORNEY TO PROTECT MY MINOR DAUGHTER AND PROVE THE NOW
FORMER WIFE WAS LYING AND HAS ABUSED MY CHILDREN!
I have told every attorney that the maternal grandfather and the grandmother have abused
my kids and that they prohibit me from talking to my kids and then I know my kids are
scared to talk to me because they will be retaliated against by the Harrods in order to
keep the grandmother for going to jail from her prescription drug violations on my kids.
MY SON NOW SUFFERS FROM THE MEDICAL RESULT OF THAT ABUSE THAT
CAN BE SUPPORTED WITH EVIDENCE AND AFFIDAVITS.
-1.2(a); -1.2(c); -1.2(d); -1.2(e); -1.3; -1.4(a); -1.4(b); were all violated per the above
facts as Turmel refused to honor the legal rights of the daughter as the daughter was
frauded that her only option to get out of the duress from the mother and the pastors was
to not finish her senior year at Citrus Park and had to move to Pensacola to stop her
abuse.
Since the daughter was a minor and I had just as much right to demand representation
independent counsel for the daughter, Stacey Turmel violated me and the daughter by her
actions to lie and give testimony that led to further harm and stress on the daughter.
-1.6(b)(1); A LAWYER MUST REVEAL INFORMATION(1) to prevent a client
from committing a crime; or (2) to prevent a death or substantial bodily harm to
another.
Doctors reports on both children show the mother and school has caused substantial
bodily harm to these kids and I have been blocked by the attorneys, the mother, the
school, the church, Curtis Baughman as I have called him several times for help.
Scruggs, Turmel and others know that the kids have been abused and they have kept me
from helping my kids.
Turmel from the time of her hiring to file the divorce case and when the mother took the
daughter to the North Florida area (May 2002) filed incorrect papers with the court to
block this father from finding his daughter and until court records submitted in January
2004, presented incorrect addresses for the minor daughter and the defendant in this case.

57

STACEY TURMEL EVEN WROTE A LETTER TO THE COURT APOLOGIZING

FOR GIVING THE WRONG ADDRESS BUT THIS WAS DONE INTENTIONALLY
SO THIS FATHER COULD NOT LOCATE THE KIDS AND GET THEM AWAY
FROM THE MOTHER AND GET HELP!
JUST THIS WEEK, in November 2005, I LEARNED THAT MY SON IS BEING
TREATED FOR A CONDITION THAT SOULD SHOW ABUSE BY THE MOTHER
BUT I KNOW THE SON OR MOTHER HAVE NOT TOLD THIS TO THE DOCTOR
TO HELP HIS CONDITION TO KNOW WHAT CAUSED IT. IF I HAD BEEN
ALLOWED AS A FATHER TO DO WHAT I TRIED TO STOP BACK IN 1998 AND
EARLIER BUT THE COERSION BY THE MOTHER AND THE PASTORS AND
CURTIS BAUGHMAN OF VICTIMS SERVICES AND THE COURTS BLOCKED
MY HELPING MY OWN KIDS! HIS BLOOD CONDITION AND HEART
CONDITION CAN BE TRACED BACK TO THE ACTS OF THE MOTHER AND
THE MATERNAL GRANDMOTHER GIVING MEDICATIONS PRESCRIBED FOR
THE GRANDMOTHER AND OVERDOSES OF OTHER DRUGS TO MAKE THE
KID SLEEP AS A BABY!
INTENTIONALLY PRESENTING FRAUD TO A JUDGE IS A CRIME YET
TURMEL REPEATEDLY HAS PRESENTED FRAUD AND ALLOWED HER
CLIENT TO TESTIFY USING FRAUD.
Turmel allowed misrepresented testimony by the wife about the January 2003, car
accident of the son and Turmel then changed the subject to protect the wife from lying
more and getting caught before the judge.
(1) The wife has no acts done by me that should allow any court to get an injunction.
(2) The presentation of the letter I wrote to her was taken totally out of context and as
presented by Turmel was a fraud on the court.
(3) The fact that Turmel did not present both contrasting sides of the true meaning of this
letter of October 11, 1999, shows her fraud to the court taking only select lines from
the letter out of context. THIS IS REQUIRED OR IS UNETHICAL CONDUCT IN
HER EXPARTE CONTACT WITH THE COURTS AND WITH HER DUTY TO
SPEAK TRUTH TO THE COURT AT ALL TIMES.
STACEY TURMEL ALSO ACTED WITH TIMMERMAN AND SCRUGGS IN JOINT
CONSPIRACY AFTER KNOWING THAT SCRUGGS HAD BEEN FIRED IN A
JOINT ATTEMPT TO HIDE HER CRIMINAL FRAUDS TO THIS PRO SE AND THE
JUDGE AND HER CLIENT WHO WAS A MINOR THE DAUGHTER!
AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS REPORT IS THE FULL DETAILS OF HOW TURMEL
INTENTIONALLY MISREPRESENTED EVEN THE AFFIDAVIT OF HER OWN
CLIENT AS REPORTED TO JUDGE PALOMINO AND KNEW THAT THIS
PLAINTIFF HAD SEVERAL WRITTEN COMMANDS FROM THE WIFE TO TAKE
HER NAME OFF OF ANYTHING INVOLVING THE HOME AND THAT SHE WAS
OWED NOT MONEY FROM THE HOME AND THE WIFE HAD MAJOR DEPTS TO
THE FATHERS PARENTS THAT SHE NEEDED TO PAY BACK WHICH
REMOVED ANY VALUE OR INTEREST THE WIFE MAY HAVE ORIGINALLY
AGREED TO HAVE WHEN THE HOME WAS PURCHASED. THE FORMER WIFE
HAD NOT KEPT UP HER PAYMENTS FOR THE LOAN AND HAD WILLFULLY

58

TOLD JUDGE PALOMINO OF HER OWN WILL IN FILING FOR THE

INJUNCTION TO JUST GIVE THE MONEY TO THE HUSBANDS PARENTS!
TURMEL SCRUGGS AND TIMMERMAN NEVER IN MY PRESENCE IN ANY
COURTROOM HEARING DISCUSSED THAT THE HOME HAD TO BE SOLD AND
THAT POINT PER ALL TRANSCRIPTS WAS NEVER RULED ON BY THE JUDGE.
THAT ENTIRE MATTER WAS DONE EXPARTE AFTER SCRUGGS HAD BEEN
FIRED! NOTE THAT THE OCTOBER 3, 2003 DRAFT FROM SCRUGGS EVEN
DOES NOT SAY THE HOUSE MUST BE SOLD AND SO THIS DECISION WAS
WELL AFTER ON OCTOBER 10, 2003, THAT JUDGE TIMMERMANS ORDER OF
DENYING THIS PRO SES MOTION FOR REHEARING THIS EXPARTE ACTION
WAS DONE BEHIND THIS PLAINTIFFS PRO SE BACK ON OCTOBER 31, 2003
the same day the judge signed the FINAL DISPOSITION ORDER AS ORDERED BY
THE JUDGE AS A PURE FRAUD AND VIOLATION OF CONTRACT LAW THAT
SCRUGGS NEW I WAS READY TO PRESENT. Then after this Final Disposition
Order the additional AMENDED FINAL JUDGEMENT IS signed and this PRO SE still
was not aware the judge was even taking phone calls or ex parte actions or hearing due to
the frauds coming out of Judge Timmermans Judicial Assistant!
THIS CONSPIRACY COST ME THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS LOST MONEY!
STACEY TURMEL EVEN LIED TO THE COURT OF JUDGE GOMEZ ADVISING
HIM THAT JUDGE TIMMERMAN HAD SIGNED AN ORDER TAKING CHARGE
OF THE CASE AND MY ISSUES FROM MY NEW MOTIONS SO THE JUDICIAL
ASSISTANT ANNICE GUNN CALLED ME AND CANCELED MY HEARING SET
FOR FEBRUARY 6, 2004. THIS AGAIN WAS A FRAUD AS WHEN I READ THE
ACTUAL PAPER IT WAS FROM THE APPEALS COURT AND NOT JUDGE
TIMMERMAN AND TURMEL HAD LIED!
I then had to get Heather Gray just to get the next hearing date set because of the turmoil
caused by Stacey Turmel with JUDGE GOMEZ and Annice Gunn.
This was again a delay caused by Turmel because of her fraud as to what the Order from
the court actually said in the paperwork that she misrepresented to the court. Annice
Gunn later apologized after the Order was received and read for what it really said, but by
that time the damage was already done and another delay meant more money and time
with my kids lost and delayed any chance to stop the abuse!
SUMMARY POINTSTACEY TURMEL
SHE MUST BE DISBARRED FOR HER INTENTIONAL FRAUDS AS FOLLOWS:
Misrepresentations and lying to the daughter a minor and not caring for her while her
mother is continually abusing the daughter and causing mental and emotional and
physical duress even requiring extreme medical attention if in fact she did get
permission to actually represent the daughter and mother at the same time. I would
like to see the written statement of approval and that it fully explains the potential for
conflict of interest. But as a parent with no limits on my rights to be a parent with full
custody from the date the Divorce Summons was issued to me on or about April
2002, until the limits by the Judge on January 30, 2003, which still did not limit my

59

right to require that Scruggs get separate counsel for my daughter still a minor until
July 8, 2003.
Multiple misrepresentations of frauds of evidence verses the Palomino case transcript
by her own client
Multiple misrepresentations and frauds verses the evidence in the letters and exhibits
presented by her to the court and even verses hand written documents that her own
client wrote and were not allowed to be put into evidence.
Multiple evidences of her conspiracy ex parte behind the back of this pro se after she
had full knowledge even from the courts own mailing the order to her that this
Plaintiff was pro se she acted in full conspiracy with the Judge Timmerman and the
fired attorney Scruggs.
Intentionally lying to and stalling her communications to this Pro Se and to Attorney
Heather Gray and to responding to letters from Scruggs as the paper trail proves.
Her conduct in the court to influence the judge by her body motions.
Her intentional misrepresentations and giving false address of the minor daughter and
the address of her clients to the courts and to this pro se for over 20 months.
Her intentional misrepresentation of the contents of the TOWNSEND v BECK
lawsuit to Judge Timmerman.
Her intentional misrepresentation to the court that led to the need for an Injunction.
Her intentional ex parte misrepresentations to Judge Timmerman in order to gain by
exparte actions the sell of the home for which her client had already told Judge
Palomino in the affidavit that she had no monetary interest because she had been
voted out of the partnership contract.
THIS IS ENOUGH TO SHOW HER MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS BUT I
CAN PROVE MORE FOR THIS BAR ASSOCIATION!

ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF STANFORD SOLOMON

RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT VIOLATED ARE:
RULE 4 SUBPARTS; -1.2(d); -1.2(e); -1.6(b)(1); -1.7(a); -1.7(b); -1.16(a)(1);
- 1.16(b)(2); -1.16(b)(3); -2.1; -3.2; (all parts) -3.3; -3.4(a); -3.4(b); -3.4(c); 3.4(f)(2); -3.5; -3.7; -4.41(a); -4.41(b); -4.4; -5.1(c); -5.2(a);
FLORIDA STATUES VIOLATED: 777 Conspiracy; 817 Fraud; 836.05 Extortion;
837 Perjury; 843 Obstruction of Justice; assisting a Doctor in 458 Medical Malpractice;
914.13 and 914.22 and 914.23 Perjury and Witness Tampering
Complainant herein alleges all facts as stated in MOTION FOR REHEARING, filed
October 1, 2003, to the court of Judge Timmerman.

60

ATTORNEY STANFORD SOLOMON SAID IN THE COURT HEARING

BEFORE JUDGE GOMEZ ON AUGUST 16, 2004 AND THE JUDGE AGREED
WITH WHAT STANDFORD SOLOMON SAID AS HE ADDRESSED HEATHER
GRAY NOT WANTING TO BE INVOLVED IN REPRESENTATION OF MY
FULL RIGHTS AS SHE ONLY WANTED TO HANDLE THE APPEAL.
SOLOMON SAID AN ATTORNEY CANNOT LIMIT HIS SCOPE OF
REPRESENTATION. HE SAID, AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A
LIMITED APPEARANCE; ONCE YOU ARE IN, YOU ARE IN.
WITH THIS BEING SAID AS HIS KNOWLEDGE THAT HE SHOULD BE
PREPARED IN ALL HIS REPRESENTATIONS OF THE FULL CASE WITH FULL
TRUTH BEING TOLD TO THE JUDGE LETS REVIEW HOW STANFORD
SOLOMON DID FRAUD THE COURTS OF JUDGE GOMEZ AND THEN JUDGE
SIERRA WHEN HE GAINED KNOWLEDGE THAT HE HAD LIED TO JUDGE
GOMEZ AND WHAT HE DID TO COVER UP HIS MISREPRESENTATIONS AND
THE DAMAGE CONTROL HE DID JUST TO PROTECT HIMSELF AND NOT
REPAIR THE DAMAGES DONE TO EVERYONE ELSE.
THE FEBUARY 6, 2004 HEARING BEFORE JUDGE GOMEZ HAD BEEN
CANCELLED AND MY MOTIONS FROM DECEMBER 2003, WERE
ALLEGEDLY THE FIRST TO BE HEARD AND HAD BEEN PUT OFF UNTIL
THE MARCH 29, 2004, HEARING.
IN THE MARCH 29, 2004 HEARING BEFORE JUDGE GOMEZ, ATTENDED BY
STANFORD SOLOMON, HEATHER GRAY, MYSELF AND THE FORMER WIFE
AND HER DAD AND MY PARENTS, THE JUDGE WAS COURTEOUS BUT NOW I
KNOW HIS ACTIONS WERE VIOLATIONS OF HIS CANONS.
MY MOTIONS WERE ALLEGEDLY NOT ALLOWED TO BE HEARD BECAUSE
OF THE APPEAL AND ALLEGEDLY JUDGE GOMEZ BELIEVED HE DID NOT
HAVE ANY JURISDICTION BUT I DO NOT NOW BELIEVE THAT THIS WAS
CORRECT THAT THE FULL MATTER FELL TO THE JURIDSICTION OF THE
APPEAL THIS IS A FRAUD BY GOMEZ, SOLOMON AND HEATHER GRAY
AS RULE 1.540 STILL ALLOWED GOMEZ TO ADDRESS THE FRAUD DONE TO
THE COURT BY THE ATTORNEYS AND TO DO SANCTIONS!
MAJOR POINT------- THIS JULY 22, 2004, MOTION HAS CAUSED THE
COURTS OF JUDGE SIERRA AND JUDGE CRENSHAW TO SHOW ABUSE
TO ME THIS PRO SE AND HAS SHUT DOWN THESE JUDGES FROM DOING
THEIR DUTY TO SANCTION THE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES INVOLVED
AND ALSO PUT THEM ON NOTICE THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE ALERTED
THE FLORIDA BAR AND THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMITTEE!
SINCE THIS MOTION BOTH JUDGES HAVE EXPRESSED ANGER AND
SANCTIONS TOWARDS ME RATHER THAN AT THE ATTORNEYS AND
THEIR CLIENTS WHO DID THE FRAUD TO THE COURT AND DID NO

61

ACTIONS TO BECK OR KAREN OR SCRUGGS FOR LYING ABOUT THE

PALOMINO ORDER!
WHERE IS THE JUSTICE IN THIS ACTION AGAINST ME---AGAIN BY THE
JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS?
ON JULY 22, 2004, this Plaintiff/Complainant filed his PRO SE MOTION FOR
CONTEMPT OF COURT AND SANCTIONS with the court and served copies on the
courts of Judges Palomino, Judge Arnold, Judge Crenshaw, the Court of Appeals, and
Judge Timmerman and others and showed proofs of the violations and frauds used by
Turmel, Solomon and Timmerman and Scruggs asking that Sanctions be filed against
these attorneys and courts and judges for the frauds still being done to this PRO SE
FATHER!
THIS MOTION SHOWS IN DETAIL HOW STANFORD SOLOMON, SCRUGGS,
TURMEL AND NOW HEATHER GRAY WERE ALL KNOWINGLY INVOLVED IN
FRAUD AND USING FRAUD TO THE COURT AS THE TRANSCRIPTS OF THE
2001 HEARING BEFORE JUDGE PALOMINO WERE PUT INTO EVIDENCE IN
THE CASE FILES OF THE DIVORCE CASE AND IN THE TOWNSEND v BECK
CASE!
THIS ALSO SHOWS THEY ALL KNOWINGLY ALLOWED AND THEN
WITNESSED A VIOLENT ACT BY THE GRANDFATHER DON HARROD AND
HOW THE EVIDENCE SHOWS IN THE LETTERS SENT TO STANFORD
SOLOMON IN THE MOTION FOR EXTENTION BY HEATHER GRAY OF
JUNE 4, 2004, SHOWS HE WAS GOING TO HELP THIS FATHER FIND OUT
ABOUT HIS CHILDREN AND THEIR MEDICAL CONDITIONS AND
STANFORD SOLOMON THEN IN HIS SEPTEMBER 24, 2004 LETTER LIED!
THIS SHOWS how Stanford Solomon now relying on the position of TURMEL AND
THE FORMER WIFE AND BECK AND THE SILENCE OF SCRUGGS had also
misrepresented the fraud of the former wife and her employer Ron Beck and thus
reported that BECK HIMSELF TOLD JUDGE PALOMINO THAT NO. AND THIS IS
NOT ABOUT PHYSICAL HARM, SIR. THIS IS ABOUT WHAT IVE STATED
PRETTY CLEARLY. So Beck himself stating the Plaintiff has not done PHYSICAL
HARM the attorneys TURMEL, SOLOMON, DENNY while SCRUGGS SAID
NOTHING even though he heard these words himself right from Beck have alleged that
the reason for the INJUNCTION AGAINST PLAINTIFF IS BECAUSE BECK AND
KAREN CLAIM I AM VIOLENT.
HOW EVER AFTER KNOWING BY BECKS OWN WORDS IN COURT AND BY
NO EVIDENCE EITHER FROM THE FORMER WIFE THAT I HAD DONE NO
HARM TO MY KIDS MY PLEAS THAT BECK AND THE FORMER WIFE
HAVE DONE HARM AND I AM IGNORED WHEN TRYING TO GET
SANCTIONS, VISITATION AND CUSTODY OF MY KIDS FROM THOSE
PASTORS AND THE FORMER WIFE WHO HAVE DONE MAJOR ABUSE TO
THESE INNOCENT KIDS SINCE 1995!

62

IF BECK HAD BEEN TOLD BY KAREN OF ANY VIOLENT ACT SURELY AT

THAT TIME BEFORE JUDGE PALOMINO ANY VIOLENT ACT WOULD
HAVE BEEN STATED TO HELP THEM GET A STRONGER INJUNCTION!
FOR JUDGE SIERRA OR GOMEZ OR CRENSHAW OR ANY OTHER JUDGE TO
LET THESE ATTORNEYS CONTINUE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES AND GET OUT
OF SANCTIONS OR DISBARMENT FOR THEIR FRAUDS ABOUT THIS
PLAINTIFF AND TO THE COURTS WITH NO BASIS FOR THEIR ALLEGED
DANGERS WHICH CAUSED ALLEGATIONS THAT CAUSED THE INJUCTIONS
IS A PURE CRIME AND SHOWS CONSPIRACY BY JUDGES TO PROTECT
LAWYERS NO MATTER HOW ODIOUS AND OUTRAGEOUS THEIR LIES AND
DAMAGES!
SOLOMON CLAIMS HIS POSITION OF KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING
WAS CREATED FROM THE CONVERSATIONS WITH KAREN HARROD
TOWNSEND, HER BROTHER STEVEN TYLER HARROD AND ATTORNEY
TURMEL. BUT IT IS HIS NEGLIGENCE THEN THAT HE DID NOT READ THE
CASE FILES!
Mr. Solomons own testimony in the transcript on August 16, 2004, before Judge
Gomez, is an attorney cannot take on just a portion of a case but must represent the
full case for the client as he claimed Heather Gray must handle the full case for the
husband.
THEN WHEN IT IS CONVENIENT FOR HIM HE CLAIMED IN HIS LETTER OF
SEPTEMBER 24, 2004, QUOTING EXACTLY herein
We represented Former Wife in a limited capacity for a limited period of time. We
neither intended nor agreed to become involved in any disputes between you and Former
Wife regarding your childrens welfare and the myriad of issues involving other counsel,
the judiciary and your former church. READ HEATHER GRAYS MOTION TO THE
APPEALS COURT AND LETTER TO SOLOMON TO PROVE THIS FRAUD BY
SOLOMON TO ATTORNEYS AND A JUDGE AND TO THIS PLAINTIFF PRO SE!
HE ALLEGES HE WAS ONLY HIRED TO HANDLE GETTING THE HOUSE
PAYMENTS MADE SO NOT TO DAMAGE HIS CLIENTS ALLEGED GOOD
FINANCIAL HISTORY! HE CANNOT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!
ALSO PER THE WRITTEN WORDS FROM HEATHER GRAY, CONFIRMING
SOLOMON AGREED TO HELP ME HAVE CONTACT WITH MY KIDS AND TO
LEARN WHO THEIR DOCTORS WERE.
On September 20, 2004, this Complainant filed with the court of Judge Monica Sierra in
case # 02-4974, a MEMORANDUM OF LAW A MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS
FEES AND SANCTIONS. These allegations were not heard in detail as the court
claimed they had not ordered the case files and had not recorded that the hearing had
been set with the Judicial Assistant.
AGAIN THIS IS EVIDENCE THIS PRO SE FATHER IS ABUSED BY THE COURTS.
On August 18, 2004, Stanford Solomon sent me a letter threatening me with Statue
57.105 unless I withdrew my MOTION FOR CONTEMPT from July 22, 2004.
THIS MOTION FROM SOLOMON CONFIRMS WHAT WAS AGREED TO IN THE
MARCH 29, 2004, HEARING THAT I WAS PROMISED SOLOMON WOULD HELP
ME CONTACT MY KIDS AND KNOW WHO THEIR DOCTORS WERE AND THIS

63

WAS CONFIRMED FROM A LETTER BY HEATHER GRAY! NO ONE EVER DID

ONE THING TO FOLLOW UP TO THIS OR GET ME ANY ANSWERS AS
PROMISED SO SOLOMON AGAIN LIED TO ME AND A JUDGE AND A FELLOW
ATTORNEY! INSTEAD SIERRA JUST LETS HIM RESIGN AND NO
PUNISHMENTS TO NOBODY! WHAT A MOCKERY TO JUSTICE AGAIN!
I sent him a reply letter.
IN THE SEPTEMBER 24, 2004, Stanford Solomon sent me this second letter as a threat
that I must withdraw my MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY FEES AND SANCTIONS or he would continue with his MOTIONS FOR
SANCTIONS AGAINST ME! I refused so the Judge Sierra stepped in a after hearing
the verbal arguments by Stanford Solomon without never hearing my argument in full or
reading my MOTIONS Judge Sierra shows her prejudice and dismissed Stanford
Solomon with no SANCTIONS ON HIM! THIS IS AN INJUSTICE THAT IN THE
SAME COURT HE THREATENED ME AND THE COURT REPORTER DENISE
BRADLEY OF BERRYHILL WAS STUNNED AND SHOCKED AT THE ABUSE
SOLOMON YELLED OUT AT ME. He said she could even use her machine to throw
at me to protect her and he said he wished he had a gun to protect himself as he expected
me to have a gun and come at him. HE FLIPPED OUT TOTALLY!
ON OCTOBER 12, 2004, Judge Sierra denied with prejudice my MOTION FOR
CONTEMPT against SOLOMON WITHOUT EVEN READING THE FILES
ALLEGING HIS ODIOUS AND OUTRAGEOUS LIES AND FRAUDS TO THE
COURTS AND THIS PRO SE AND FURTHER DAMAGING THIS PRO SE JUST
BASED ON THE FAST TALKING OF SOLOMON AS A LAWYER TREATING
THIS PRO SE LIKE AN IDIOT.
With this being said he incriminates himself to the issues he assumed and gladly argued
before Judge Gomez and before Judge Sierra.
ON OCTOBER 12, 2004, while the Judge had left the courtroom, Attorney Solomon
went out of control with verbal slander and abusive talk against this father/husband just
trying to obey the laws but Solomon resented the fact that his client and her brother had
lied to him and entrapped him in their fraud before the court. The Court Reporter, Denise
Bradley of Berryhill and the bailiff were present and heard the out of control lawyer
conduct. Judge Sierra was not in a mood to hear the matter and based on her ruling
against my motion for Sanctions and the proofs offered Judge Sierra was in violation of
the law and Rules of Court and her duties as a Judge.
MAJOR POINT---WHEN I TOOK OVER AS PRO SE THE ACTS DONE BY THE
FORMER WIFE AND BY STACEY TURMEL AND HAD NOW INVOLVED
STANFORD SOLOMON EVEN THOUGH HIS TESTIMONY TO JUDGE GOMEZ
WAS THAT HE WOULD HELP ME LEARN HOW TO CONTACT MY KIDS AND
TO LEARN WHO THEIR MEDICAL DOCTORS WERE SO I COULD HELP THEM
BUT INTEAD SOLOMON WORKED TO BLOCK ME FROM MY DAUGHTER AND
DISCOVERY OF THE EVIDENCE OF HER BEING ABUSED BY THE MOTHER
AND THE CHURCH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES WAS A VIOLATION OF THE
FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND NOT ALLOWING IN EVIDENCE
THAT PROVES THE FRAUDS BY THE DEFENDANTS AGAINST ME. THE
PROPER TESTIMONY OF THE DAUGHTER AND SON WILL PROVE THE

64

FRAUDS OF THE MOTHER, THE ATTORNEYS AND THE CHURCH /SCHOOL AS

THESE KIDS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED!
PER R.O.C.P 4-3.4(a) ALL ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES, DEFENDANTS AND
DOCTOR LYNN, HAVE (a) UNLAWFULLY OBSTRUCTED ANOTHERS
PARTYS ACCESS TO EVIDENCE. THE DAUGHTER AND SON IS EVIDENCE
OF THE ABUSE THIS PRO SE FATHER IS TRYING TO REPORT, STOP AND
REPAIR NOW SINCE 1995.
ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF HEATHER GRAY
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT VIOLATED ARE:
RULE 4 SUBPARTS
FLORIDA STATUES 777 Conspiracy, 836.05 Extortion, 837 Perjury, 843 Obstruction
of Justice, 895 RICO, 914.13 and 914.22 and 914.23 Perjury and Witness tampering
EXTRINSIC FRAUD AND FRAUD ON THE COURT.
Complainant herein alleges all facts as stated in MOTION FOR REHEARING, filed
October 1, 2003, to the court of Judge Timmerman putting Heather Gray on notice.
Heather Gray was hired as early as March 14, 2003, at a dinner meeting and paid a
retainer check when Scruggs advised I would need her services as he did not do appeals.
She was paid a $1,000.00 check as retainer and given full details of the case at dinner.
ACCORDING TO SCRUGGS ADVICE AND CONTROLS OF THE ISSUES STILL
BEFORE JUDGE TIMMERMAN TO GET THE REHEARING AND TURMEL TO DO
HER PART, I COULD NOT HAVE HEATHER DO THE APPEAL SOONER DUE TO
SCRUGGS AND TURMEL DRAGGING OUT NOT EVEN DOING THEIR DUTIES
FOR APPEAL OF JUDGE TIMMERMANS RULING. I EVEN WANTED A
GUARDIAN AND CUSTODY OF MY DAUGHTER RIGHTS APPEALED AND
SCRUGGS AND I DISCUSSED WITH HIM THAT WHAT ARE THEY WAITING
FOR, HER TO TURN 18, SO I CANNOT HAVE THE COURT ORDER HER FOR
COUNSELING? HE NEVER ANSWERED!
After the September 2003, meeting when Scruggs was fired, Heather was contacted and
advised to get the appeal ready for the court immediately. We had the draft then that
Turmel was sending to the court. I was advised by her to represent myself on the other
matters and she would just handle the appeal. We spoke often to keep her updated and I
even gave her the details of my trying to file the NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE FINAL
JUDGEMENT and my meetings with LYNN MEEHAN, Court Administrator.
HEATHER DELAYED STARTING AS FAST AS I WANTED HER TOO AND
BLAMED SCRUGGS FOR NOT TELLING HER WHAT WAS DONE IN THE
SEPTEMBER 22, 2003, or thereafter hearing that I had not been allowed to attend.
HEATHER GRAY NEVER FILED A NOTICE TO APPEAL THE AMENDED
JUDGEMENT!
AT HER DIRECTIVE I SIGNED HER EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT AND DID NOT
BACKDATE IT BACK TO MARCH 14, 2003.
HER FEBRUARY BILLING REPORT SHOWS THAT BETWEEN FEBRUARY 3,
2004, and FEBRUARY 12, 2004, numerous phone calls had to be made to the J.A.
Annice Gunn and to me her client and to opposing counsel as she did get involved in the
hearing with Judge Gomez as the unethical conduct and fraudulent conduct by Stacy
Turmel had my hearing with Judge Gomez cancelled and Stacy Turmel would not return

65

phone calls. All along Heather advised me she was working on getting the appeal
written. All along she advised me that she was trying to learn what actually happened in
the September 22, 2004 hearing (which I told her what happened as I was there and ready
to do my affidavit) and the SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER hearings done EXPARTE before
Judge Timmerman but since there was no transcripts, she stated that Scruggs and Turmel
were not talking to her or talking to me as we later learn to unravel their ongoing criminal
exparte conspiracy acts with the Judge. She then started her stalling and she also then
blamed the moving of the courthouse as delaying the court getting the file ready for the
Appeals Court Records as she wrote in one letter. Heather Gray then never got the
appeal filed and the case was dismissed before I could correct her negligence brought on
by her trying to protect what she learned was the malpractice of Scruggs and Timmerman
and Turmel. I asked her several times how she was coming with the appeal and get
around not showing the frauds by Scruggs and Turmel and Timmerman. She never
answered the question until by her actions to not file the appeal and she stopped returning
my phone calls. She wasted out my retainer letting Scruggs and Turmel and Solomon
practice their stalling tactics. I told her to help me request and file for SANCTIONS on
Scruggs and Turmel and Solomon to get the legal fees covered and she told me to write
those, WHICH I DID only to have Judge Sierra IGNOR THEM and release Solomon
without even reading my paperwork or listening to my points in the hearing as the
transcript confirms. SIERRAS PREJUDICE WAS OBVIOUS!
The $1000.00 paid to Heather Gray in March 2003, per what she said should easily have
got the appeal done for this simple case she said!
I now see that her not filing the NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE AMENDED
JUDGEMENT as another complaint of the frauds she did to me while she was covering
for Scruggs malpractice. These at least six drafts and signing of the judgements were not
even sent to me by the attorneys or judges while I was pro se as another proof of the
conspiracy to fraud me and not expose their crimes or appeal their crimes timely.
HER LETTER AND PHONE CALL SAID FOR ME TO PAY HER ADDITIONAL
MONIES AND THAT SHE WOULD FILE FOR AN EXTENTION TO ONCE AGAIN
DELAY THE HEARING ON THE APPEAL SINCE SCRUGGS AND TURMEL
WERE STILL NOT TALKING. SHE THEN TOLD THE APPEALS COURT
DIFFERENT THAN HER LETTER AND OUR AGREEMENT BECAUSE SHE SENT
THEM A RESIGNATION LETTER AND ALSO DID NOT IT APPEARS FILE FOR
THE EXTENTION SO THE APPEAL WAS DISMISSED AND NO REVIEW OF ALL
THE CRIMINAL ACTS WAS DONE WHICH TO A JURY WILL LOOK LIKE SHE
BECAME PART OF THE CONSPIRACY! THIS IS CONFIRMED IN HER MAY 23,
2004 LETTER STATING THE HEARING FOR MAY 24, 2004, HAD BEEN
CANCELLED AND SHE WAS GOING TO FILE FOR AN EXTENSION! EVEN
BEFORE I COULD WASTE MORE MONEY AND GET HER A CHECK TO ALLOW
HER TO CONTINUE TO STALL SHE HAD THE APPEAL DISMISSED BECAUSE
OF HER INSIDE CONNECTIONS AS SHE BRAGGED ABOUT WHEN I HIRED
HER ON HER CONTACTS WITH THE APPEAL COURT!
NOW LOOKING BACK SHE HAD TOO MANY TIES WITH AND LOYALTIES
WITH SCRUGGS AND THE GOOD OLD BOY NETWORK AND GOT CAUGHT BY
ALL THE LYING TO HAVE WRITTEN A FAIR APPEAL IN THE FIRST PLACE.

66

SHE DID NOT NEED THE HELP OF SCRUGGS OR TURMEL AS THE TRAIL OF
CONDUCT AS SEEN JUST ON MY PAPERWORK COLLECTED HEREIN IS
SUFFICIENT PROOF TO SHOW THE ANGER OF THE JUDGE AND THE
CONNIVING AND DECEPTIONS WITH THE OVER 6 ATTEMPTS AT THE FINAL
AND AMENDED JUDGEMENTS AND THE DECEPTION AND ABUSE ON THE
KIDS AND THE DECEPTION ON THE SALE OF THE HOME AND ALL THE
TRANSCRIPTS SHE HAD MORE THAN SHE NEEDED!.
SHE WANTED OUT AND SHE LIED TO ME AND TO THE APPEALS COURT TO
GET OUT! SHE DID NOT SEND TO ME HER RESIGNATION LETTER AS SHE
SENT TO THE APPEALS COURT BUT NOTE THEIR WORDING OF THEIR
DISMISSAL ORDER AND IT PROVES HER PLAN!
HEATHER GRAY WAS AT THE HEARING WITH JUDGE GOMEZ ON
MARCH 29, 2004 AND HEARD THAT HE WAS GOING TO ALLOW THE
APPEAL TO CORRECT THE ERRORS MADE BY TIMMERMAN AND THEN
HIS COURT WOULD THEN GET JURISDICTION BACK FROM THE
APPEALS COURT AS WE ALL HAD DISCUSSED WHAT ANNICE GUNN
TOLD US HOW THE JUDGE WAS SO UPSET OFF THE RECORD WITH
WHAT HE HAD READ HAD HAPPENED! The transcript will confirm that Judge
Gomez showed his adversity to the Judge Timmerman ruling but the Appeals court
had jurisdiction he alleged.
It is my position and I believe it can be proved with the supporting evidence that
upon learing the issues and the position by Judge Gomez as to how he felt the file
showed proof that the case should be overturned by the Appeals court that had my
Appeal be sent to the Appeals court and they reversed the orders of Judge
Timmerman that this entire coverup and conspiracy by Defendant, Turmel, Scruggs
and Timmerman would require that these attorneys and Judge be disbarred for all
the frauds that were done. AND NOW IT SHOULD LEAD TO THE OTHER
ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES THAT HAVE DONE THE CONTINUING FRAUDS
AND HARMS TO ME AND MY KIDS.
Judge Gomez and Judge Sierra can see that Heather Gray nor Scruggs had filed the
NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE AMENDED JUDGEMENT and this also shows
that Scruggs was not cooperating with me or Heather Gray to keep my interests
protected but was proof of covering his EXPARTE actions.
MY MOTIONS FOR EXTENTIONS OF TIME TO THE APPEALS COURT
SHOW THAT MY ATTORNEYS AND STACEY TURMEL WERE IN
VIOLATION OF THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BY NOT RETURNING
PHONE CALLS AND NOT SENDING ME DOCUMENTS AS A PRO SE.
THE MOTION FOR EXTENTION OF TIME, sent by Heather Gray to the Appeals
Court June 4, 2004, is great proof of the actions of TURMEL to never return phone calls
as she did to ignore me during all of 2002-2003 while I was PRO SE and she knew her
bias and prejudice with the court would call my actions a lie as Timmerman did against
this Pro Se. Included in these court records also are letters( February 26, 2004; April 6,
2004 to Turmel and one to Solomon) from Heather Gray that were sent to Turmel and to
Solomon showing numerous requests for information and the confirmation of what
Stanford Solomon agreed to outside the court on March 29, 2004, regarding the status of
my kids health and how I could reach their doctors.

67

SOLOMON ADVISED ME HE WROTE TO THE FORMER WIFE AND

REQUESTED THE INFORMATION ON THE CHILDREN!
REQUESTING THIS INFORMATION OUTSIDE THE COURT OF JUDGE GOMEZ
IS WHAT CAUSED THE GRANDFATHER DON HARROD TO TRY TO ATTACK
THIS FATHER AND STANFORD SOLOMON AND HEATHER GRAY HAD TO
GET INBETWEEN THE GRANDFATHER AS HE STARTED TO COME AT ME TO
ATTACK ME!
SOLOMON HAD AGREED TO GET US THIS INFORMATION EVEN THOUGH IN
HIS THREAT LETTER IN SEPTEMBER 24, 2004, HE CLAIMS HE NEVER MADE
THIS PROMISE! SOLOMON IS A PURE LIAR AGAIN WITH THE WRITTEN
PROOFS TO JUDGE GOMEZ, TO JUDGE SIERRA AND TO HEATHER GRAY
AND MYSELF!
SUMMARY POINT:
IT IS MY POSITION THAT HEATHER GRAY INTENTIONALLY DID NOT
APPEAL THIS CASE AS TO ASSIST IN THE COVERUP AND PROTECT
ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES.
SHE NEVER FILED A NOTICE OF APPEALS OF THE AMENDED
JUDGEMENT!
AS PROOF NOTE HER OWN EXHIBITS PRESENTED IN THE JUNE 4,
2004, MOTION FOR EXTENTION TO THE APPEALS COURT AND WHAT
IS MISSING FROM HER PRESENTATION IS A LETTER OR MENTION
THAT SCRUGGS WAS ALSO NOT ALLOWING INFORMATION TO
RECREATE THE FILE ON WHAT HE DID IN SEPTEMBER 22, 2003
HEARING NOR HIS PARTICIPATION IN THE OCTOBER 1, DECEMBER
2003,
NOR IS MENTION FROM HER AS SHE TRIED TO DODGE IT WHEN SHE
HEARD SCRUGGS EXPARTE CONDUCT WITH JUDGE GOMEZ.
SHE KNOWS HIS VIOLATIONS REQUIRE HIM TO BE DISBARRED AND
SHE DID NOT PLAN TO CONNECT THE EVIDENCE THAT SHOWED HE
WAS CRIMINAL TOWARDS HIS CLIENT AND THE COURTS!
SHE LIED TO ME THAT THE APPEAL WAS READY TO BE FILED AND
YET SHE HAD NOT SHOWN ME THE DRAFT AS SHE AGREED TO DO
DURING THE PROCESS!
SHE SOUGHT WITHDRAWAL LEAVING ME NO TIME TO GET THE
APPEAL CASE FILES AND EVIDENCE FOR THE APPEALS COURT DUE
TO HER STALLING TO COVER FOR THE CRIMES OF SCRUGGS AND
TURMEL AND TIMMERMAN AND SOLOMON AND THEN HERSELF
AND JUDGE GOMEZ.
SHE AFTER AGREEING TO HELP ME GET CONTACT WITH MY KIDS
PER HER LETTER WRITTEN TO SOLOMON SHE THEN IGNORED MY
PLEAS TO HELP MY KIDS EVEN THOUGH SHE WITNESSED A
VIOLENT ACT OUTSIDE THE COURT OF JUDGE GOMEZ BY DON
HARROD THE GRANDFATHER OF MY KIDS!

68

THE IS PART OF THE CRIMNALS THAT CONTINUE THE ABUSE ON MY

KIDS AND FOR THIS EVEN HER BEING A MOTHER SHE SHOULD
UNDERSTAND MY GRIEF AND THE GRIEF OF MY KIDS AND OUR
ABUSE AND SHE DID NOTHING BUT BURY EVIDENCE.
SHE WAS TOLD AND MANY TIMES SHOWN MY MOTIONS AND
EMERGENCY PETITIONS OF ALL THE CASES OF THE DIVORCE AND
OF MY APPEAL ISSUES AGAINST THE CHURCH AND THE ISSUES IN
THE MOTIONS BEFORE JUDGE CRENSHAW FOR HER ALLEGED PREP
OF MY ISSUES AS RELATED FOR THE DIVORCE APPEAL!
I FIND NO EVIDENCE WHERE SHE NOTIFIED THE APPEALS COURTS
OR THE FLORIDA BAR OR THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS
COMMITTEE OF THE VIOLATIONS STATED HEREIN FOR WHICH SHE
BECAME AN ACCOMPLICE AND SHE HAD A DUTY TO REPORT
LAWYERS AND JUDGES FOR THE CRIMES AND VIOLATIONS AS
STATEDIN THIS REPORT PER THE TESTIMONY OF STANFORD
SOLOMON AND MYSELF! SHE BECAME A CRIMINAL WITH THEM!
SHE MUST BE DISBARRED!

ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF JUDGE PALOMINO

RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT VIOLATED ARE:
RULE 4 SUBPARTS
Judge Palomino was very wise in the hearing of cases 01-15813 and 01-15814 but my
only concern was that when he was sent by the Sheriffs Department and my letter
showing the complaint showing how Beck had given two false statements on the
Affidavit to get the temporary injunction Judge Palomino never did nothing to my
knowledge and based on Scruggs saying he would discuss this with the Judge something
should have been done on the fraudulent statements in the Affidavit and even more once
this unveiled with hard evidence Beck would lie to the Judge.
Judge Palomino was sent the photos of my high school football team picture showing
Beck and myself and also showing Beck and myself in the GASPARILLA Parade
standing by the float. We have known each other since the 1970s but BECK LIED IT
WAS 1990s when he returned to be the Church/School pastor. This is to prejudice the
judge that Beck only knows me as a pastor and not as a friend he had betrayed and had
know of my character and integrity for over 20 years!
Beck also knows my path to work allowed me to pass right by the School and
My needs to be a dad to my kids and protect them from the still continuing abuse conduct
by the pastors and teachers due to the lies Beck was telling his employees and sheriff
deputies to practice against me for no reason!
NOT DOING NOTHIING LET BECK, KARENS AND SCRUGGS FRAUDS
CONTINUE TO DAMAGE ME AND MY KIDS WHO HE AS A FAMILY JUDGE
SHOULD KNOW HIS COURT MUST DO TO PROTECT AND HAD SANCTIONS
AND INJUNCTIONS AND BENCH WARRANT OPPORTUNITIES BASED ON MY
REPORTS THIS WAS A SHAM!

69

I alleged that it is very probable that Scruggs got Palomino to ignore my follow ups about
the frauds done by Beck and Karen to cover up for Scruggs frauds by not present the full
case before Judge Palomino on November 15, 2001.
IF he had EXPARTE contact with Scruggs after Judge Palomino knew I was pro se
trying to inform him of the frauds and then also to get my property back after the case
was dismissed then he violated several Canons!
ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF JUDGE TIMMERMAN
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT VIOLATED ARE:
RULE 4 SUBPARTS AS A JUDGE HE IS ALSO TO ACT AS A LAWYER AND
KNOWS THE RULES THAT HE AND THE ATTORNEYS UNDER HIM IN HIS
COURT ARE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW. BUT THE ACTIONS HEREIN WILL
SHOW HE DEFILED HIMSELF, THE LITIGANTS, THE ATTORNEYS AND THE
COURT.
RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION RULE 2.160
JUVENILE PROCEDURE RULE 8.675Timmerman should have required the
mental exam of the mother and daughter due to the issues of this case with even what was
presented to him.
CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
CANONS: I; II A; II B; III A(1); III A(2); III A(3); III A(4); III A(5); III B(1);
III B(1); III B(2); III B(3); III C(1)(a); III C(1)(b); III C(1)(c); III C(1)(c)iii;
III C(1)(c)iv;
FLORIDA STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS:
1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.1; 2.2; 2.4; 2.5; 2.8; 4.11; 4.21; 4.31(a); 5.11(b); 5.11(e); 5.11(f);
6.11; 6.32; 7.1; 9.22(b); 9.22(c); 9.22(d); 9.22g-j; 12.1(b)
AS EVIDENCE OF THE ACTS OF MISCONDUCT PLEASE NOTE:
(1) MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on October 1, 2003, to the court of Judge
Timmerman. NOTE THAT JUDGE TIMMERMAN DENIED THIS MOTION and
the OCTOBER 10, 2003, DENIAL ORDER OF THE JUDGE IS EVEN MAILED
BY HIM TO THE ATTORNEYS TURMEL AND THE TERMINATED SCRUGGS
SO ALL HAD FULL KNOWLEDGE SCRUGGS ACTIONS WERE STOPPED and
then still did his acts in conspiracy with Scruggs despite the first line of this motion
stating, COMES NOW RANDALL TOWNSEND, NOW PRO SE, now having
immediately fired, Respondents former attorney, Charles H. Scruggs, III Esquire,
for reasons the court is already aware from pointing out in verbal testimony and
from evidence.
(2) WHEN I TRIED TO GET MY NEXT STEP A MOTIOIN FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, Judge Timmerman would not grant a
hearing and the deceptions began that his being reassigned stopped me getting the
hearing yet Turmel and Scruggs got their deceptions through due to their conspiracy
to cover up their crimes.
(3) JUDGE TIMMERMAN ENTERED THE COURT ROOM ON JANUARY 30, 2003,
ALREADY UPSET AND PREJUDICED AND BIASED AGAINST THIS
RESPONDENT HUSBAND AND THEN HIS ANGER GOT WORSE WITH THE
FRAUDS OF THE ATTORNEYS.

70

(4) Judge Timmerman is the most out of control judge I have seen verses about 20 other
judges I have argued cases before and every word out of my mouth to him started a
vile attitude and prejudice. I QUESTION THAT SINCE HE HAD JUST COME
FROM A DOCTOR THAT MAYBE HIS PAIN AND MEDICATION WAS
AFFECTING HIS ABILITY TO LISTEN AND NOT BE SO ARGUMENTATIVE!
(5) ONCE ONE TAKES FROM JUDGE TIMMERMAN THE FIRST FRAUD
THAT HE HAD BLAMED AGAINST THIS FATHER/HUSBAND THAT
SCRUGGS WAS NOT PREPARED BECAUSE SCRUGGS DECIDED TO
NOT BE PREPARED FOR OVER A WEEK AND THAT HE NEVER
INTENDED TO DEFEND HIS CLIENT BASED ON HIS FOLLOWUP
ACTIONS, THEN THE ENTIRE BIAS AND FRUSTRATION OF THE
JUDGE MUST GO TO THE ATTORNEY AND THE RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEEDURE DO NOT ALLOW FOR A CLIENT BEING PUNISHED DUE
TO THE ILLEGAL CONDUCT AND MALPRACTICE BY THE ATTORNEY!
BASICALLY, THE JUDGE TRYING TO DO THE DIVORCE AT THAT TIME
AS QUICKLY AS HE DID WITH EVERY ORDER THAT HE MADE AS
HOSTILE AS HE ACTED WAS MY SANCTIONED PUNISHMENT WITH HIS
WRATH DUE TO THE FRAUD BY SCRUGGS THAT HE CHOSE NOT TO
PRESENT A DEFENSE AND NOT BECAUSE HIS CLIENT WAS ALSO
DEMANDING HE BE MORE PREPARED AND USE THE EXHIBITS HE HAD
IN HIS BRIEFCASE!
THE FACT THAT THEN THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE YEAR THEN THIS IS
PROOF THAT HE CONTINUED HIS WRATH ALL YEAR AND EVEN THE
ACTIONS AFTER THE MOTION FOR REHEARING SHOULD HAVE
PROTECTED THIS FATHER FROM ADDITIONAL DAMAGES AND NOT
THEN PUNISH ME BY MAKING ME SELL MY HOME AND DOING THIS
BEHIND A PRO SES BACK!
(6) The next series of events was the argument by Scruggs that he wanted an extension
and that exchange in the transcript shows where many frauds based on the facts above
in the Scruggs section show that Timmerman was outraged even more against this
respondent husband due to the frauds by Scruggs. Judge Timmerman refused to
listen and if he heard what Palomino, Arnold and Crenshaw knows based on their
listening then it went in my favor as the real victim.
(7) Much of what I was entrapped to do to prepare for this Divorce action that according
to the wife up until the week before the hearing was to be cancelled as out of one
side of her mouth she was saying just show me proof of what Beck did and
maybe we can reconcile. And this is what I was trying to do with the lawsuit
against the alleged pastor and the damages of the church was in the case of Judge
Arnold and that hearing did not happen until January 21, 2003.(Transcript available)
Note that in that hearing was requested Discovery and Requests for Protection for my
kids as with this information finally I could present these TRUTHS on paper to the
wife and hopefully prove to her I was not lying about the evil of the church and
pastors and THUS SAVE MY MARRIAGE AS KAREN WAS TALKING OUT OF
BOTH SIDES OF HER MOUTH AND IN DECEMBER 2002 SAID SHE WAS
THINKING ABOUT CALLING OFF THE DIVORCE! I THOUGHT IT IS
BECAUSE HER MOTHER AND BROTHERS WONT LET HER BECAUSE AS

71

KAREN TOLD ME IN OCTOBER 1999, HOW CAN YOU BE SO RIGHT AND

ALL THESE OTHER MEN BE SO WRONG? NOW OVER 5 YEARS LATER
MY BEING RIGHT IS OVER 98% OF EVERYTHING I WAS ADVISING
REGARDING THE ACTS OF KAREN BEING ILLEGAL AND THE ACTS OF
THE PASTORS BEING FRAUDS. Counseling would help the marriage after we got
past the crimes she has caused. SCRUGGS AND I DISCUSSED THIS STRATEGY
AND HE DID NOTHING! Now I can realize Scruggs saw my actions with Judge
Arnold and Judge Crenshaw telling the truth a threat to him and his misconduct.
(8) THE ATTORNEYS WITHHOLDING THE EXTENT OF THE MEDICAL CARE
THAT THE DAUGHTER AND SON NEEDED AND STILL NEED WAS A
FRAUD TO THE COURT AND PROVED THE POSITION THAT JUDGE
TIMMERMAN EXPLODED ON THIS FATHER THAT THE CHILDREN
WOULD BE REQUIRED TO GET EXAMS FOR PRIOR CONDITIONS IN
ORDER TO GET INSURANCE WAS MERITED AS SHOWN IN THE
TRANSCRIPT OF JANUARY 30, 2003, on page 58. Over a dozen reasons can be
proved as to why medical and mental evaluations on the former wife and children are
necessary and a court order to honor the request of this father/husband was the civil
action to take.
(9) NOTE SCRUGGS TESTIMONY TO THE COURT IN THE JANUARY 30, 2003,
TRANSCRIPT ON PAGE 8 LINE 17, AS A PURE DECEPTION ON THE COURT
ALLEGING, I just wonder about my status with the bar association representing a
man in trial that I have not had a chance to prepare for. And this is confirmed as a
pure fraud that further angered the judge at the client.
(10) Later Judge Timmerman with knowledge as stated in the MOTION FOR
REHEARING, had a duty to know his prejudice against and punish the client for the
frauds the attorney did and Timmerman had a duty to overturn his rulings and also to
report Scruggs to the Florida Bar but this is proof of their collusion to protect each
other at the expense of Justice, the family and this complainant.
(11) JUDGE TIMMERMAN ALSO HAD FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT HE DID
NOT EVER HEAR EVIDENCE AS TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE HOME
AND THE NEED TO SELL THE HOME AND WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE
THAT I WAS A PRO SE WITH A LOT OF EVIDENCE HE WAS REFUSING
TO HEAR AND MULTIPLE COURT FILES HE DID NOT READ BY HIS
OWN ARROGANCE AND STUPIDITY HE DID THE EXPARTE ACTIONS
BEHIND THE BACK OF THIS PRO SE AND REVIEWED MANY
VERSIONS OF A JUDGEMENT AND SIGNED THE FINAL AND THEN THE
AMENDED JUDGEMENTS WHILE HIS JUDICIAL ASSISTANT WAS
LYING TO BE THAT THE JUDGE WAS PAST THIS CASE AND NOT
HEARING ISSUES! THE FINAL JUDGEMENT AND THE AMENDED
FINAL JUDGEMENT AND THE GARNISHMENTS AS A MATTER OF LAW
ARE NULL AND VOID AND EVIDENCE OF FRAUD BY TIMMERMAN,
SCRUGGS AND TURMEL AS PER THE LEGAL AID OFFICER!
(12) NOTE BELOW THE OCTOBER 1, 2003 through mid 2004 evidences of
actions done by Timmerman in his conspiracy to act fraud!
HOW TIMMERMAN VIOLATED HIS CANONS:

72

IJudge Timmerman has on the wall outside of his office a sign that says NO
DIVORCE UNTIL: (1) Counseling sessions and a certificate when minor children
are involved. (2) Mediation Certificate. And allegedly these are State Law
requirements. SO then Timmerman violated his own self and rules and also continued
the harm done on my kids as victims to the abuses by the former wife and these alleged
pastors! This again showed his bias and overlook his warnings and my request for
counseling for the kids and the former wife which would let everyone know if this was
dealt into that the real lies were from the actions by the wife and I have not caused this as
they allege. This would also have showed Scruggs had done malpractice in the 2001
matters which bond again another reason Scruggs and Timmerman had to violate the law
in their conspiracy. Had the judge listened properly to the testimony of the abuse of the
kids then he would have not retaliated against my statement of the insurance questions
and my son was a witness to my many attempts to provide insurance for them. His
cutting off my answers every time even made it more obvious to not try to represent
myself as all this judge did every time was want to argue at me! I said nothing to
aggravate him other than saying, YOU DONT KNOW WHO MY COUNSELORS
ARE! AND NOR ARE THEY ALL REVEALED IN THIS REPORT HEREIN AS IT IS
NECESSARY FOR ALL INVOLVED TO JUST DO THEIR JOB ETHICALLY AND
NOT WORRY ABOUT TRYING TO PLEASE PEOPLE IN THE CONSPIRACY TO
CONTINUE THESE FRAUDS DONE TO ME AND MY KIDS!
***JUDGE TIMMERMAN SHOULD HAVE BEEN TOLD MY SCRUGGS THAT
KAREN NOT WANTING COUNSELING AND THE KIDS NOT GETTING
COUNSELING WOULD LEAD TO MORE INFORMATION FOR HER TO BE
BLAMED FOR AS EVEN ILLEGAL AND THE KIDS DO NOT WANT THEIR
MOTHER TO GO TO JAIL BUT THEY ARE SCARED AND LIED TO ENOUGH
THAT THEY DO NOT KNOW THEIR MOTHER AND PASTORS ARE STILL
TRYING HAVE THIS FATHER PUT IN JAIL FOR YEARS TO COVER FOR THEIR
CRIMES!
INSTEAD JUDGE TIMMERMAN PLAYED UP TO THE WOMEN EVERY TIME HE
COULD!
The entire transcript of the January 30, 2003 hearing is proof of improper conduct and
abuse on me and my kids as victims to the abuse and lies of the mother and her attorney.
Then on the conduct after OCTOBER 1, 2003, after Scruggs was fired and my MOTION
FOR REHEARING was denied by the court and ignored my rights this show this is not
a Judge but a weak man out of control, thinking he is a judge.
ONCE TIMMERMAN FOUND OUT THE TRUTH THAT SCRUGGS HAD LIED
AND HE REALLY HAD NOT JUST BEEN HIRED TWO DAYS BEFORE AND
SCRUGGS KNEW MORE THAN HE WANTED TO TELL BECAUSE OF HIS
ALLEGED PERSONAL CONVICTIONS THEN WE HAD MULTIPLE CAUSES TO
HAVE THE CASE RETRIED BASED ON SCRUGGS MALPRACTICE AND THE
JUDGES OWN BIAS AS HE WALKED IN THE ROOM AND HEARD THE LIES
FROM TURMEL!
There was no decent and honorable conduct out of this court.
II A. I repeat the comments said above in section I and throughout this report.
II B. I repeat the comments said above in section I and throughout this report.

73

III A. (1) I also point out that this code says not be unswayed by partisan interest.
There are two points here in that Scruggs said he could definitely get the Judge to grant
him the continuance as they were old friends and that was his reason for not preparing.
And Second from the issues in the transcript one can easily see that he was biased to the
women.
Clearly the fact that this Husband was positioned as a litigant against a church did not set
well with judge Timmerman. Also he was persuaded that I tried to get the wife fired for
no reason but as stated above. The reasons were many that showed she was in violation
of the teaching code of conduct in her employment manual AND STUDENT
HANDBOOK which can be provided for this review process and is not entanglement in
religion but is conduct for a school to conform to state requirement.
It is hard to understand one would turn on their wife until you know the extent of her
crimes but that is what a divorce judge is paid to do ---hear both sides and then decide.
THIS JUDGE WAS BY THE CONNIVING AND CONSPIRACY OF TURMEL AND
HER CLIENT AND SCRUGGS PERSUADED TO TOTAL BIAS AGAINST THIS
VICTIM THE HUSBAND AND THE KIDS AND TIMMERMAN WENT FOR ALL
THE LIES BY THE ATTORNEYS HOOK LINE AND SINKER!
He actually has too many violations to count!
III.
A. (1) A judge should be Faithful to the law and maintain professional
competence in it.
III A. (2) This judge even to the point of yelling at this husband when the Judge ask
WHO AT KMART and YOU NEED COUNSELING sections. How is this using
proper conduct?
III A. (3) Judges are to be patient, dignified and courteous but this entire case with this
Judge shows a transcript and actions in full disgrace of this Canon.
WHERE IS THE DIGNITY IN KNOWING WHEN THE JUDGE REALIZED HIS
ACTIONS WERE UNFAIR TO HIS COURT AND TO THE PERSONS SETTING
BEFORE HIM THAT HE THEN USED THE DECEIPT AND FRAUD TO A PRO SE
WHO TOOK OVER HIS CASE TO TRY TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF HIS KIDS
AND HIMSELF BUT INSTEAD THIS JUDGE GETS HIS ATTORNEYS TO
SAGBOTAGE AND DO ADDITIONAL FRAUDS IN THE EVENTS OF NOVEMBER
AND DECEMBER 2003 AS STATED HEREIN?
III A. (4) The transcript shows my FULL RIGHT TO BE HEARD and AFFORDS
THE PARTIES REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND.:. was denied first by
the false information given by my own attorney Scruggs and the lying of Turmel and also
the fact that when I did try to speak judge Timmerman kept interrupting me and wanting
to argue with my testimony. He was in a hurry and then did not hear me out on many
answers to questions.
He had delayed the case from being heard the day before and was just trying to squeeze
this divorce into a cramped schedule and no one cared to call me to cancel when I left
work from the Ruskin store where I had over 65 people counting on my supervision as
they had just been told their store was being closed in a few weeks. They were looking to
me as their manager for major support and answers but I had to go get abused in court.
Also I had to return to work in Ruskin not to get home till after midnight over 50 miles
away from my residence and back up very early the next morning and change my
assistant managers schedule to make sure the store was protected but this judge again

74

shows his anger. He accused me of delaying from April when the case was served on me
until allegedly the last minute hiring an attorney and then note that the January 30, 2003
divorce hearing does not get a Judgement signed until 11-12 months later--- longer that I
had been scolded (April January) about and also the alleged list of things the former
wife had to get out of the home that night did not finally get delivered to me until over a
year later! Where is the justice in this?
III A. (4) A MAJOR POINT IS:
ALSO AS COVERED MANY TIMES IN THIS REPORT THE ACTIONS BY
TIMMERMAN TO DO ALL ACTIONS AFTER DENYING MY MOTION FOR
REHEARING SUBMITTED OCTOBER 1, 2003, IS PROOF OF MULTIPLE
EXPARTE ACTIONS IN VIOLATION OF MY RIGHT TO BE CONTACTED AND
EVEN OBJECT TIMELY.
I can prove his actions were to even make me miss the opportunity to file an appeal as he
was ignoring my PRO SE status and surely Scruggs based on his refusal to talk to
Heather Gray regarding September December 2003 showed he did not want an appeal to
happen either.
MY RECORDS ON FILE SHOW THAT THE RULINGS BY THIS JUDGE WERE
NOT EVEN FORWARED TO THIS PRO SE AND THIS PRO SE HAPPENED TO BE
AT THE COURT HOUSE AND PULLED THE FILES AND LEARNED OF THE
ORDERS ISSUED BY THE JUDGE AND WITH ONE DAY TO SPARE. THEN
WITH ONLY THAT ONE DAY THIS PRO SE HAD TO FILE THE APPEAL WHICH
HEATHER GRAY THEN DID NOT DO AS SHE WAS PAID TO DO! I STRONGLY
BELIEVE HIS INTENT NOT TO COPY ME CAN BE PROVED TO THE POINT
THAT IT WOULD NOT ALLOW ME AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO THE APPEAL.
LOOK AT THE CONSPIRACY TRAIL OF TIMMERMAN, TURMEL AND
SCRUGGS LOCATED AT THE END OF THIS REPORT!
THIS WAS ANOTHER ATTEMPT AT THE COVER UP THAT AN APPEAL
WOULD NOT EXPOSE THEM BUT THEN THEY ENTRAPPED HEATHER
GRAY TO DO IT FOR THEM!
THIS IS EVIDENCE THAT THE PAPERWORK WAS INTENTIONALLY HELD UP!
THE PAPERWORK WAS NOT SENT TO ME AND IT WAS DELAYED PUTTING IT
IN THE CASE FILE FOR ME TO EVEN REVIEW WITH THE CLERK OF THE
COURT AND BEING DENIED ACCESS TO THE JUDGE BY THE JUDICIAL
ASSISTANT! I WAS SENT BY THE CLERK TO THREE DIFFERENT OFFICES
BECAUSE THEY COULD NOT FIND THE FILES IN THE FIRST PLACE!
I ALSO MADE SEVERAL CALLS TO THE COURT AND WAS DENIED HEARING
AS THE JUDICIAL ASSISTANT TOLD ME THAT JUDGE TIMMERMAN WAS
BEING REASSIGNED AND WOULD NOT BE SETTING HEARINGS YET THESE
ACTIONS WERE DONE WHILE I AS A PRO SE WAS FRAUDED BEHIND MY
BACK.
III A. (5) PROMPT Note the issues stated above. How can this not be a double
standard and a misrepresentation of the court rules? When it takes Turmel months to file
the exhibits that allegedly this Judge should have read in detail before he ruled and thus
we have a double standard and bias again.
Also a Judge is to expect that the lawyers cooperate with him to that end and then how
is this being done promptly when Scruggs is dragging his feet for 11 months and also not

75

presenting the truthful evidence of how my case was never told and the lies was the
pattern for this court. It shows that Scruggs never intended to defend my case, EVER!
III A. (7): Based on the evidence of the transcript of January 30, 2003, Judge
Timmerman had no control over his courtroom. The evidence presented was false
and when he was told that and that he should read the Townsend v Beck case and
the actual exhibits in full as presented he got angry for being told what to do. He
continually even to the point of yelling at the victim husband father and tried to
hurt this father every way this alleged judge could out of his anger. When he was
told his conduct meant he should be disqualified he did not listen but then conspired
with the attorneys during the end of the matter 11 months later and violated every
rule he could against this PRO SE to the point of committing fraud to block this Pro
Se filing an Appeal.
III B.(1) This canon was violated many ways and has been explained thoroughly
herein.
III B.(2) This judge communicated no fidelity or trust of anything from this court.
It is proved he advocated and promoted using fraud, deceit and false evidence and
retaliation to me that showed him the attorneys and wife under his supervision used
fraud to him. Also by him granting the injunction he blocks this PRO Se access to
his own kids which Judge Palomino and Judge Crenshaw found disturbing and for
no reason and Palomino and Crenshaw do not yet know how vile the former wife
has acted on her own kids.
III B.(3) A judge should take or initiate appropriate disciplinary measures against
a judge or lawyer for unprofessional conduct of which the judge may become
aware. Upon reading my MOTION FOR REHEARING, October 1, 2003,
Timmerman had a duty to explore the frauds alleged to see if there was more proofs even
if he did not believe parts of the Motion. He new I was right and that the frauds did exist
but he had to cover up his own bias and prejudice and ill conduct as SCRUGGS had
pointed out in the Motion to Disqualify the judge.
****This created the bond that if you dont turn me in then I wont turn you in. SO they
all three had many reasons to protect each other and continue the conspiracy and do the
acts as described below herein as the trail shows.
MAJOR POINT---Timmerman upon reading the MOTION FOR REHEARING, was
faced with these choices:
Rehear the case and this shows Turmel and Scruggs played him for a fool based
on the lies Turmel told and proved the lies Scruggs told and his silence and
EXTRINSIC, CONSTRUCTIVE, FRAUD IN FACT, FRAUD IN THE
INDUCEMENT and INTRINSIC FRAUD WHICH ARE ALL SHOWN AND
CAN BE PROVED HEREIN TO A JURY IN MORE THAN SUFFICIENT
DETAIL.
This would also prove how he came quick to judgement and show his bias and
prejudice and these violations of these Canon of himself.
Or he could bond with Scruggs and Turmel and keep this hid as they did from
this PRO SE as outlined below so he could not do the appeal.

76

To further show the anger of Timmerman look at the facts presented in the
testimony of Karen and even Beck to Judge Palomino verses the even less details
of possible allegations of reasons for an injunction and not that with even
hearing no evidence of wrongdoing or abuse or potentional harm Timmerman
takes away from me my rights and enters an injunction that I cannot see my
kids. Karen and Beck has lied so much that I have been afraid to even hug my
kids for many years during her and Beck making their accusations and
assistance with Howlett and then Judge Timmerman that just by more lies I get
put in jail! What a mockery of this called court of justice run by Timmerman!
ASK MY KIDS! THEY KNOW THEIR MOTHER LIES! THEY KNOW
THEIR PASTORS LIE! WHY WOULD THIS NOT CONFUSE ANY CHILD?
So Timmerman sided with Turmel and this makes Palomino, Arnold and
Crenshaw wrong because they heard this Husband/FATHER side of the facts
and they listened and ruled in favor of this Husband/Father/Plaintiff but
Timmerman did not listen and shows himself foolish as the rulings of these
judges should be the same or
Side with Palomino, Arnold and Crenshaw and turn in Turmel and Scruggs for
their lying about the true facts as presented to Palomino, Arnold and Crenshaw
Also he should and DID limit my financial resources and run me out of money as
he ordered me to sell the home that I could have taken a 2nd mortgage on
possibly and but I had to pay the former wife who had no right per the affidavit
and agreements that she was owed nothing and also make me pay out child
support that the former wife only asked for after years of refusing my help when
by paying I could have gained greater rights to parent my kids and make me pay
her $500.00 a month for allegedly making her quit her job which was allegedly
due to my crimes and nothing she or the pastors brought on themselves as shown
herein. This was done with Scruggs knowing that I had in December 2003 many
additional expenses because of now working in South Sarasota and had an
apartment payment on top of the house bills and other charges and over a 97
mile one way trip to the house. With the garnishments I lost money every month
on expenses I could not cut! THE PLAN TO BANKRUPT ME WORKED!
THE THE ACTION BY TURMEL AND SOLOMON AND GOMEZ to make
me come up with another $3000.00 bond when I was already broke from the
frauds and the appeal was stalling just again shows the abuse of this alleged
justice system.
III C. (1): Disqualification: This is not a case where bias was just questioned but is
flagrant. The action by Judge Gomez to remove himself from the case was much
less reasons than Timmerman had even with Scruggs telling him to step out in the
January 30, 2003 hearing as Scruggs did tell him he was showing signs of prejudice.
Scruggs knew then that his lying to the Judge had caused the Judge to be prejudice.
What the evidence shows is the judge did not disqualify himself just so he could
control not being proved the fool and then used his powers to further hurt this
husband victim.
III C. (1)(a) He shows personal bias as stated herein. Also he has personal
knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceedings due to the
actions he took verses what the true evidence he was to read shows Judge Palomino

77

and Judge Crenshaw had views that supported this husband and not the injunction
issues of the former wife.
III C. (1)(b) He was and still is and will be a material witness in my lawsuits
required against Scruggs and Gray and Beck and the former wife and he put
himself in the middle due to his lying to me and not following state laws about the
mediation and counseling she needed and then the expert reports would confirm my
story since 1995!
III C. (1)(c) He knows he has a financial interest now in this case as his actions
should cost him his job if these attorneys and judges do not keep covering for him
but exposure will drive him out of office as I can prove my daughter and son have
suffered abuse and based on the publics view of abuse on children as this judge and
scruggs and turmel allowed they brought these damages on themselves and do not
deserve to be out of jail for their abuse on this father and his children.
III C. (1)(d) (iii) and (iv)---As just stated above he knows his job is on the line and
also he knows he will be brought to testify in the above mentioned cases!
III D. His order not disqualifying himself did not satisfy me or Scruggs from what
Scruggs said as we left the court on that September 22, 2003, but Scruggs later told
me I had no recourse to fight it and that I know now is another lie as he and the
Judge had talked on or about September 23-30, and had made their pack to destroy
me and protect each other. He knew he would be called when I sued Scruggs as they
both knew it was coming.
THE PROOFS SHOW JUDGE TIMMERMAN NOT BE COMPETENT TO BE A
JUDGE AND HE HAS BETRAYED THE BENCH AND ALL THOSE BEFORE
HIM!
SUMMARY POINTS: Violations of Judge Timmerman
9 show abusive conduct throughout the January 30, 2003 transcript and the year
9 fraud practiced by the judge by not requiring mediation and counseling which
the state required to protect the children who now suffer many conditions due to
the violations of the pastors and the mother
9 frauds by both attorneys that angered the judge more than when he had just
walked in the room
9 many reasons this judge of his own knowledge knows he should have
disqualified himself but he had many motives to control his criminal acts on this
court and this husband victim
9 proof with the events as listed in the conspiracy section below that he directed
additional criminal actions by the attorneys and he himself acted to violate the
Rules of Courts and without hearing evidence that he knew he had been lied to
by Scruggs and Turmel and the former wife he still required me to loose my
home and contact with my kids and requires me just to watch as they are
repeatedly abused
9 show that he deserves to be disbarred because he did more damage and ignored
more laws and he had the highest standard to uphold but he was the most
dangerous to the already victims before him as me and my kids
9 HE HAD TO LIE TO OTHER JUDGES AND INCLUDING JUDGE
MENENDEZ ABOUT THE EVENTS OF THIS CASE OR JUDGE

78

MENENDEZ HAD BY RULE THE REQUIREMENT TO FIRE HIM OR

BRING HIM UP ON CHARGES TO THE JQC FOR HIS CRIMINAL ACTS.

ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF JUDGE CRENSHAW

RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT VIOLATED ARE:
RULE 4 AS A JUDGE SHE IS ALSO TO ACT AS A LAWYER AND KNOWS THE
RULES THAT SHE AND THE ATTORNEYS UNDER HER IN HER COURT ARE
REQUIRED TO FOLLOW. BUT THE ACTIONS HEREIN WILL SHOW SHE
DEFILED HERSELF, THE LITIGANTS, THE ATTORNEYS AND THE COURT.
CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
CANONS: I; II A; II B; III A(1); III A(2); III A(3); III A(4); III A(5); III B(1);
III B(1); III B(2); III B(3); III C(1)(a); III C(1)(b); III C(1)(c); III C(1)(c)iii;
III C(1)(c)iv;
FLORIDA STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS:
1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.1; 2.2; 2.4; 2.5; 2.8; 4.11; 4.21; 4.31(a); 5.11(b); 5.11(e); 5.11(f);
6.11; 6.32; 7.1; 9.22(b); 9.22(c); 9.22(d); 9.22g-j; 12.1(b)
Judge Crenshaw started out a first to be a fair Judge but in our last few hearing starting
March 31, 2004, she has become biased protecting Denny right about the time that
Gomez heard all the Timmerman and Scruggs malpractice and when she sees Dennys
clients have lied to him and the cases he promoted KOND and MALICKI have
backfired based on the REVERSAL Position of the Supreme Court and verses the
position of the District Courts of Appeals which Denny first used.
The Supreme Court in Malicki v. Doe states,
We conclude that the First Amendment does not provide a shield behind which a
church may avoid liability for harm caused to an adult and a child parishioner arising
from alleged sexual assault or battery by one of its clergy, and accordingly approve the
Third Districts decision. We thus join the majority of both state and federal jurisdictions
that have found no First Amendment bar under similar circumstances.2
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HAS EXPLAINED THAT THE FREE
EXERCISE CLAUSE EMBRASES TWO CONCEPTSFREEDOM TO BELIEVE
AND FREEDOM TO ACT. THE FIRST IS ABSOLUTE BUT, IN THE NATURE OF
THINGS, THE SECOND CANNOT BE. CONDUCT REMAINS SUBJECT TO
REGULATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF SOCIETY CANTWELL v
CONNECTICUT 310 U.S. 296, 303-304(1940).
******Denny was also told that per the Malicki case standard that per the Supreme
Court he had the burden to prove that 6. Constitutional law 84.2Before the
constitutional right to free exercise of religion is implicated, the threshold inquiry is
whether the conduct sought to be regulated was rooted in religious belief. AT NO
TIME DID DENNY DO THIS OR DID JUDGE CRENSHAW REQUIRE DENNY
TO ATTEMPT TO ANSWER MY POINTS TO THIS ISSUE OF HIM PROVING

79

WHAT HIS PASTORS DID WAS RELIGIOUS OR ACTS FROM MALICE AND
EXTORTION!
THE POSITION OF THIS PLAINTIFF IS THAT TORT LAW GOVERNS THIS
ACTION AS THE TORT BY THE PASTOR AS AN OFFICER OF A NOT FOR
PROFIT CORPORATION OF THIS STATE AND TO ACT UNDER THE NOT FOR
PROFIT LAWS AND INSTEAD HIS TORT WAS TO VIOLATE THE FLORIDA
STATUES AND NOT REPORT MONEY OVER $300,000.00, WHICH IS
DOCTORING THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION. AND VIOLATIOIN OF
MISSAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. THESE ARE NOT INVASIONS ON HIS
RELIGIOUS BELIEFS BUT PURE VIOLATIONS OF BUSINESS LAWS AND
MAJOR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY TO FRAUD INNOCENT PEOPLE!
IT WAS THEN THE TORT ACTION BY THE PASTORS AND FINANCE
COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND TRUSTEES AND SELECT MEMBERS TO USE
DECEPTIVE AND FRAUDULENT TACTICS TO EXTORT MONEY FROM
INNOCENT VICTIMS AND USE EXTORTION AND USE HARRASSMENT AND
HATE CRIMES AND EVEN OF THEIR OWN CHOICE USING THE COURTS TO
HARASS AND ABUSE THE MAN WHO SAID THEY WERE IN VIOLATION OF
HIDING OVER $300,000.00, TO THE POINT OF CAUSING THE PLAINTIFF AND
THE SON AND THE DAUGHTER TO EXPERIENCE THE NEED FOR MEDICAL
ATTENTION ARISING FROM THE ABUSE AND EXTORTION TACTICS ON THIS
PLAINTIFF AND MY MINOR CHILDREN AND THE WIFE BECAUSE THIS
ALLEGED PASTOR AND A CHURCH WANT TO KEEP THE PASTOR OUT OF
JAIL FOR HIS STEALING MONEY WITH THIS BAND OF THIEVES ON THE
FINANCE COMMITTEE AND TRUSTEES.
IT WAS THEN THE PASTOR WITH PER HIS OWN TESTIMONY TO THE COURT
OF JUDGE PALOMINO STATING HE WAS THERE ON BEHALF OF THE
CHURCH IN HIS DUTY AS A PASTOR TO FRAUD THE COURT THAT THEY
HAD DONE NO VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW OR NO TORTS AGAINST THIS
PLAINTIFF AND THAT FOR NO REASON THIS PLAINTIFF WAS ALLEGEDLY
STALKING AND HARASSING THE CHURCH AND THIS ALLEGED PASTOR
AND OTHERS. AND THIS DEFENDANT BECK STATED IN THE TRIAL BEFORE
JUDGE PALOMINO THAT NO. AND THIS IS NOT TALKING ABOUT PHYSICAL
HARM, SIR. REFERRING THAT THIS PLAINTIFF HAS ONLY USED LETTERS
AND WORDS TO SHOW THE CRIMES OF THESE DEFENDANTS INCLUDING
SHERIFF DEPUTIES AND A DOCTOR AND YET THIS PASTOR STILL GETS THE
BENEFIT OF OPPOSITE THE RULING OF JUDGE PALOMIONO JUST BECAUSE
THE PASTOR AND THESE DEFENDANTS ARE WILLING TO LIE EVEN MORE
TO THEIR NEW ATTORNEYS AND NEW JUDGES!
THE MAJORITY OF THE EXTORTION CAUSED BY THIS PASTOR AND THE
CHURCH MEMBERS STATES IS WHAT THROUGH PROPER COUNSELING
WILL SHOW WHAT CAUSED MY DIVORCE!
THIS PLAINTIFF SEEKS COMPENSATION FOR THESE ACTS OF EXTORTION
AND HATE CRIMES AND ABUSE DONE BY THE PASTORS AND CHURCH
MEMBERS AND THE CHURCH AS A WHOLE!

80

JUDGE CRENSHAW HAS REPEATEDLY NOT RULED ON PLAINTIFFS

REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION AND MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS AND HAS
NEVER SINCE ALLOWING THIS PLAINTIFF TO REPLEAD THE AS IN THE
AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED APRIL 19, 2004, RULED THAT THE
INFORMATION REQUESTED DOES NOT GO TO REDRESS FROM MALICOUS
PROSECUTION AS IT EXTENDS TO THE CHURCH AND TO THE MEMBERS AT
LARGE! UNTIL THE JUDGE REMOVES HER ORDER TO STOP ALL ACTIONS
UNTIL THE $924.00 is paid this PLAINTIFF IS continuing to be damaged!
I REPEAT WHAT I SAID IN DENNYS SECTION AS IT APPLIES HERE!
MAJOR POINT!!!!!!!!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
THE KOND CASE:
WAS NOT A CASE TO SHOW REDRESS FROM A
COURT ACTION BY THE CHURCH AGAINST A PERSON BUT IT WAS AN
ACTION BROUGHT BY THE PERSON AGAINST THE CHURCH AND THE
FACTORS WERE MUCH LESS THAN HERE!
BUT IN THIS CASE I AM REDRESSING A COURT ACTION BY THE PASTOR,
MY FORMER WIFE, AND THE CHURCH MEMBERS THAT WERE EVEN IN THE
COURT READY TO TESTIFY AS CHURCH MEMBERS AND THE CHURCH
TRUSTEE ALSO AS THE SHERIFF DEPUTY WHO WITH HIS TESTIMONY
BEFORE JUDGE PALOMINO WAS THERE TO TESTIFY AND THE TESTIMONY
REPORTED TO THIS PLAINTIFF FROM THE OWN WORDS OF THIS DEPUTY
WERE GOING TO BE FALSE AND FRAUDULENT AND PERJURIOUS
TESTIMONY TO JUDGE PALOMINO.
MY CASE AS ALLOWED TO STAND AND AGAIN BE REPLEAD ON APRIL
19, 2004, IS A MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CASE TO REDRESS THE
ORIGINAL ATTEMPT OF THE FRAUDULENT INJUNCTION BECK AND
THE CHURCH MEMBERS TRIED TO GAIN BY PERJURY AND FRAUD AND
TORT ACTIONS AND SLANDER AND LIBEL THAT STILL HAS LED TO A
COURT ORDERED INJUCTION AGAINST ME THAT REQUIRED ME TO BE
BANDED FROM MY KIDS NOW FREELY SINCE 1995 till WHO KNOWS
WHEN AND PROOFS OF PERMANENT DAMAGE TO OUR FATHER CHILD
RELATIONSHIP AND ALSO REQUIRED ME TO SELL MY HOME FOR
$10.00!
Per the FLORIDA SUPREME COURT as REDRESS FOR MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION TO PROVE MALICE AND PROVE OUTRAGEOUS AND
ODIOUS CONDUCT NOTE THE FOLLOWING:
Matthew Bender & Co. Inc. (Rel.16-1/97 Pub. 565) FLORIDA TORTS Section on
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION Section 22.
This Publication quotes the use of Pellegrini v. Winter 476 So2d 1363 (Fla. 5th DCA
1985) and other cases and also states that same publication in the section for:
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS.

81

THE COURT OF JUDGE CRENSHAW HAS NOT ALLOWED THIS PLAINTIFF TO

GET DISCOVERY OF THESE PAPERS REQUESTED SINCE THE JANUARY 21,
2003, HEARING ACKNOWLEDGED BY JUDGE ARNOLD!
POINT ONE-----These actions by Judge Crenshaw have ignored many pleas of this
Plaintiff and as told the judge in hearings that this Plaintiff while he does not give up his
right to pursue individual actions against these persons which may fall outside of the
alleged protected utterances as of KOND it is believed that these actions by this church as
an AT LARGE and as select individuals will prove the OUTRAGEOUS AND
ODIOUS that go way beyond the very frail argument of KOND and allow this
DEFENDANT TURNED PLAINTIFF to show just cause of action that goes to the
extreme action much more damaging than KOND that would allow TORT LAWSUITS
FOR LIBEL AND SLANDER AND PROOF OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS and PAIN
and MENTAL ABUSE AND TRAMA on me and my kids!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
POINT TWO-----KOND was not a case of REDRESS AS DEFENSE OF THE ACTION
THAT THE CHURCH CAME BEFORE THE COURT OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL
AND SUED KOND AS MY CASE IS REQUIRING DISCOVERY OF SPECIFIC AS
STATED DOCUMENTS.
MY REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONS ARE FOR MY DEFENSE FROM MY
DAMAGES FROM THEIR FILING THEIR FREE WILL LAWSUIT AGAINST
ME AND TO PROVE TO JUDGE CRENSHAW THAT IT WAS NOT JUST
BECK IN THAT COURTROOM BUT IT WAS THE ENTIRE CHURCH WITH
HIM AS THEIR PASTOR THERE TO MURDER MY REPUTATION SO THAT
THEIR VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA STATUES CANNOT BE PROSECUTED
BY THE STATE AS CRIMINAL FRAUDS AND ALSO ALLOWING ME TO
SHOW THE EXTENT OF THE NECESSARY PROOFS FOR OUTRAGEOUS
AND ODIOUS EXTREME CONDUCT!
FROM THE LIES STATED BY THE PASTOR IN OPEN COURT BEFORE JUDGE
PALOMINO I MUST AS JUDGE CRENSHAW AND JUDGE ARNOLD STATE
PROVE THE CHURCH SUPPORTED BECK IN THE COURT OF PALOMINO THAT
DAY IN 2001!
I SEEK TO PROVE UNDER REDRESS FROM THEIR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
THAT THE MALICE AND TORT ACTIONS WERE SHOWING THE KNOWLEDGE
AND THE STILL TORT ILL WILL THAT THIS PASTOR AND THEN THESE
CHURCH MEMBERS AND AT LARGE OTHER MEMBERS INTENDED TO
IGNORING THE ACTIONS THAT THIS PLAINTIFF WAS ASKED BY THESE
SAME PERSONS TO DO FOR THEM TO FIND THE HIDDEN MONEY THAT
BEFORE THIS PLAINTIFF WAS ALLOWED TO PRESENT HIS FINDINGS TO THE
MEMBERS AT LARGE THAT THEN THIS PASTOR AND THE TRUSTEE AND
THE FINANCE COMMITTEE WITH THE PASTORS STAFF AND PERSONAL
FAMILY DID THEN START NEW FRAUDS, TORT ACTIONS, AGAINST
PLAINTIFFS WIFE AND KIDS AND THEN THESE SAME CHURCH MEMBERS
BEFORE PLAINTIFF WAS EVER ABLE TO GIVE HIS FULL PROOFS OF THE
NOW DISCOVERED OVER $300,000.00 that was not per Florida Statues being
reported as officers of a not for profit corporation!

82

I HAVE CLEARLY IN MORE DETAILS THAN JUST THIS SHORT PARAGRAPH

ABOVE SHOWED THE COURT OF JUDGE CRENSHAW THESE POINTS AND
MANY TIMES EXPLAINED DAMAGES AND TORTS DONE BY THESE CHURCH
MEMBERS EVEN NOW MY FORMER WIFE IN THE ACCUSATIONS USED IN
THE COURT OF JUDGE TIMMERMAN WHO USED BECKS ACTIONS TO ANGER
AND FRAUD JUDGE TIMMERMAN AND I EXPECT TO BE ALLOWED UNDER
FLORIDA LAW TO REDRESS THE FRAUDS THAT THESE PASTORS AND
CHURCH MEMBERS STARTED WHEN THEY FILED FOR THE INJUNCTION
AND DIVORCE AGAINST ME! I WANT TO EXPOSE THEIR HATE CRIMES AND
TORT ACTIONS AGAINST ME EVEN WILLINGLY USING FRAUD TO JUDGE
TIMMERMAN AND JUDGE PALOMINO.
DENNY I STILL IN HIS LATEST ATTEMPT TO BLOCK DISCOVERY IN HIS
OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO PRODUCE, of September 16,
2005, again shows multiple issues of fraud by his statements and attempting to tell
the judge by allegedly reminding the judge of her own actions which she has not
done as stated but in April 2004 said replead to show how the Church and
individuals have been involved so she may rule then if the Malicious Prosecution
should extend to the Church At LARGE and possibly then to select members as
stated in the lawsuit or others that still can be named!
THE AMENDED PLEADING filed per the court within 20 days was filed APRIL
19, 2004 as advised and then the court based on the sanctions she said I had to pay
put all matters of this case on hold until the $924.00 was paid.
THE ISSUES BEFORE THIS COURT as to if now this Plaintiff still being not given
yet one document that had been requested since the court of Judge Arnold and now
requested through productions and through requests for sanctions motions and
showing how these documents will prove for Judge Crenshaw that the entire church
helped and supported Beck doing OUTRAGEOUS AND ODIOUS conduct even
to the point of their frauds to Judge Palomino being used in the court of Judge
Timmerman with the same frauds Denny stated in his FIRST AFFIRMATIVE
DEFENSE to Judge Crenshaw has led to the injunction that Timmerman did that
has kept me from my kids now as a father with full rights that the church and a
trustee out of control deputy from my kids now for over 3 YEARS of not being able
to see my kids and they are now 20 and 22 years old and this started as lies by Beck
when they were 10& 12 TO COVER FOR THE FACT THAT HE WAS HIDING
MONEY!
BY ATTEMPTING TO BLOCK THESE NECESSARY PAPERS AS
REQUESTED IN 2003 and BEFORE TO SCRUGGS TO GET IN 2001 so to
present to Judge Palomino ---DENNY IS PROTECTING HIM AND HIS FIRM
AND HIS CLIENTS FROM SANCTIONS AND PROOFS OF HIS FRAUDS ON
THE COURT WHICH HAS ALLOWED HIS CLIENTS TO CONTINUE THEIR
FRAUDS AND DAMAGES AGAINST THIS PLAINTIFF AS THEIR HATE
CRIMES STILL HAPPEN IF I WALK DOWN THE MALL OR TO THE
POST OFFICE!
DENNY HAS HIS CLIENTS BELIEVING BECAUSE WE WERE JOINT
CHURCH MEMBERS THAT THEY CAN NEVER BE SUED FOR DAMAGES

83

FROM THEIR LIES FRAUDS HATE CRIMES AND DURESS AND LIBEL AND
SLANDER THAT THEY STILL DO NOW FOR 10 years!
CRENSHAW IS NOT PROTECTING A CHURCH BUT IS PROTECTING A CULT
AND LAWYERS AND JUDGES WHO HAVE VIOLATED THE FLORIDA
STATUES AND MY CIVIL RIGHTS!
I HAVE NOW REVIEWED MY POINTS OF LAW WITH SEVERAL ATTORNEYS
AND UP TO THE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICES AND CRENSHAW
BLOCKING MY RIGHTS LETTING DENNY USE KOND AND MALICKI HAS
PROVED HER INCOMPETENCE TO BE A JUDGE!
A CHURCH AND THE INDIVIDUALS CANNOT BE EXEMPT FROM MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION AND CONTINUE HATE CRIMES DURING THE LITIGATION
WHEN THEY ARE THE ONES FROM THE COURT THAT SOUGHT TO INVOLVE
THE COURT IN THE FIRST PLACE AND THIS PLAINTIFF DEMANDS MY RIGHT
TO BE COMPENSATED FOR THESE EXTORTIONS AND DURESS AND HATE
CRIMES PRACTICED AGAINST MY CIVIL RIGHT TO JUST WALK DOWN THE
STREETS OF THIS COUNTRY! THIS CHURCH AS MEMBERS ELECTING THEIR
PASTOR TO SPEAK FOR THEM OPENLY TOOK AWAY ALL MY RIGHTS THAT
THIS CONSTITUTION AND UNTIL TIMMERMAN THE COURTS HAD NOT
RESTRAINED EITHER OTHER THAN THE NOVEMBER 2, -15, 2001,
INJUNCTION TIME PERIOD BEFORE PALOMINO HEARD THE PROBLEMS AND
THREW THE WIFE AND PASTOR OUT OF COURT ONLY FOR THE PASTOR
AND NOW FORMER WIFE TO LIE ABOUT THE RULING OF THE JUDGE TO
CONTINUE HATE CRIMES TO BE PRACTICED AGAINST ME!.
I STILL CANNOT BE FREELY WITH MY KIDS OR THESE PEOPLE WILL USE
THE COURT TO HAVE ME PUT IN JAIL AND I HAVE NO RECOURSE TO
ENVOKE MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BE A FREE FATHER!
JUDGE CRENSHAW KNOWS I HAVE TOLD HER TOO MANY WAYS FOR
HER TO NOT GET IT HOW I AM DEFENDING MY SELF TO REDRESS THE
CHURCH ACTIONS THEY STARTED AND CONTINUE AND JUDGE
CRENSHAW IS NOT STUPID THAT HER IGNORING MY MOTIONS AND
REQESTS FOR SANCTIONS IS ALLOWING DENNY AND SCRUGGS TO
STAY OFF THE HOOK AND HER ACTIONS MAKE HER AN ACCOMPLICE
TO ALLOWING THE HATE CRIMES THESE CHURCH PASTORS AND
MEMBERS STARTED TO STILL DO DAMAGE!
SHE IS A WILLING ACCOMPLICE NOT BY THE KOND CASE OR ANY
OTHER RULE OF CIVIL PROCESS SHE DOES NOT WANT TO VIOLATE
BUT BY HER NOT WANTING ME TO SHOW HOW THE ATTORNEYS AND
JUDGES BEFORE AND NOW INCLUDING HER ARE FRAUDS TO CIVIL
LAW!
I AM TIRED OF DANCING THROUGH HOOPS THAT THIS ALLEGED PASTOR
STARTED IN 1995 TO COVER UP THE FACT THAT HE WAS FRAUDING A

84

CHURCH! TEN YEARS OF A FREE RELATIONSHIP WITH MY KIDS IS GONE

AND THESE CRIMINALS WILL PAY GREATLY FOR THEIR ABUSE!
I HAVE AND STILL WILL BE LEGAL IN ALL MY EFFORTS BUT I AM TIRED,
VERY TIRED OF THIS ALLEGED LEGAL SYSTEM PROTECTING THIS
CRIMINAL STILL VIOLATE ME BEING OPPOSITE OF THE ALLEGED FAMILY
TEACHING HE DOES EACH WEEK FROM A PULPIT AND NOW FOR MANY
YEARS HAVE ALLEGEDLY TRUTHFUL LAWYERS AND JUDGES KEEP ME
THE VICTIM BY THEIR GAMES! THIS IS NO GAME YOU HAVE WASTED 10
YEARS OF MY FREE RELATIONSHIP WITH MY KIDS BY THE CRIMINAL
ACTIONS DONE AGAINST ME FALSELY! THIS IS ITSELF ALL THE PROOF I
NEED TO A JURY TO PROVE THAT MY REPUTATION WHICH WAS PERFECT
WITH HONORS FROM A STATE ASSOCIATION AND MANY OTHER PEOPLE
HAS BEEN DAMAGED BY THOSE THAT REMAIN VILE CRIMINALS TO COVER
UP THEIR CRIMES OR COVER UP ACTIONS OF THEIR FELLOW LAWYERS
AND JUDGES!
MAJOR POINT------- THIS JULY 22, 2004, MOTION HAS CAUSED THE
COURTS OF JUDGE SIERRA AND JUDGE CRENSHAW TO SHOW ABUSE
TO ME THIS PRO SE AND HAS SHUT DOWN THESE JUDGES FROM DOING
THEIR DUTY TO SANCTION THE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES INVOLVED
AND ALSO PUT THEM ON NOTICE THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE ALERTED
THE FLORIDA BAR AND THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMITTEE!
SINCE THIS MOTION BOTH COURTS HAVE EXPRESSED ANGER AND
SANCTIONS TOWARDS ME RATHER THAN AT THE ATTORNEYS WHO
DID THE FRAUD TO THE COURT AND DID NO ACTIONS TO BECK OR
KAREN OR SCRUGGS FOR LYING ABOUT THE PALOMINO ORDER!
WHERE IS THE JUSTICE IN THIS ACTION AGAINST ME---AGAIN BY THE
JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS?
FOR CRENSHAW TO TELL ME THAT BECKS AND THE CHURCHS ACTIONS TO
DESTROY MY MARRIAGE AND MY RELATIONSHIP WITH MY KIDS AND
THAT IS A FAMILY LAW MATTER IS A PURE FRAUD BECAUSE THIS IS
PROOF OF A DAMAGE THAT THE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CASE
REQUIRED ME TO PROVE PER presence of malice in instituting the proceeding,
and damage conforming to legal standards resulting to the plaintiff. CAUSED BY
BECK AND HIS ACCOMPLISES THROUGHOUT THE CHURCH WHO IGNORED
BECKS LIES BUT CHOSE TO EXTORT ME TO BE QUIET AFTER THEY ASKED
ME TO FIND THE MONEY IN THE FIRST PLACE!
TURMEL AND THE WIFE USED THE FACT THAT BECK AND THE CHURCH
HAD SUED ME TO THE POINT THAT THIS ANGERED THE JUDGE AND THIS IS
THEN PROOF THAT DAMAGE RESULTED WITH ME HAVE AN INJUNCTION
PUT AGAINST ME TO NOT SEE MY KIDS AND ALSO ALLOWED THESE
ATTORNEYS TO FORCE ME TO INCURE GREAT FINANCIAL LOSS AND HAVE
TO ALSO SELL MY INVESTMENT HOME AND HAVE ABUSED ME IN MY
COMMUNITY THAT I GREW UP IN SINCE 1965 BECAUSE THE NEW CHURCH
PROPERTY WAS LESS THAN 1/3 mile FROM MY HOME! I HAVE BEGGED

85

THESE CHURCH MEMBERS LEAVE ME ALONE NOW FOR YEARS YET THESE
ACTIONS BY THIS CHURCH STILL IN 2005 WORK TO KEEP A RESTRAINING
ORDER FROM ME SEEING MY KIDS WHO ARE NOW NOT 10 and 12 BUT 20 and
22.

DECEMBER 18, 2002, PLAINTIFFS MOTIONS:

TO COMPELL ANSWERS
FOR NOTICE OF PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO
SUPPORT OF CAUSES OF ACTION,
3)
FOR CLAIM FOR COURT INJUNCTION,
4)
FOR CLAIM FOR SUPPORTING PUNITIVE DAMAGES PER FLORIDA
STATUES
5)
FOR PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

1)
2)

CLEARLY ADDRESS MULTIPLE POINTS THAT WILL SHOW THE FRAUDS

DONE IN THIS CASE BY THE ATTORNEY AND THE DEFENDANTS AND
PROVE HOW THIS IS NOT JUST A RON BECK COVERUP AND ATTACK ON
ME BUT IT IS SPREAD TO THE ENTIRE ADMINISTRATION OF THE
CHURCH AS THEY DID NOT MANY OF THEM PUT THE DOTS TOGETHER
AND KNOW OF THE MISSING MONEY AS I TRIED TO REPORT BEFORE
BECK AND THE FINANCE COMMITTEE STARTED THEIR PERSONAL
ATTACKS ON MY SANITY CALLING ME POTENTIONALLY DANGEROUS
AND SUFFERING FROM A STRESS RELATED BREAKDOWN.
DENNY AGAIN GETS THE ATTEMPTS AT THIS DISCOVERY OF TRACK BY
HIS GAMES AND MY MOTIONS ARE NOT HEARD IN THE HEARING!

THE FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE FILED OCTOBER 23, 2003, BY

ROLFES/DENNY AND IS A PURE FRAUD AND CANNOT BE SUPPORTED BY
THE TRANSCRIPTS OF THE JUDGE PALOMINO CASE! BUT AGAIN THERE
IS PROOF OF THE EXTENT OF THE LYING THAT BECK AND THE FORMER
WIFE WILL DO AS THEY OTHER THAN SCRUGGS WERE THE ONLY ONES
IN THE COURT OTHER THAN THE JUDGE, THE COURT REPORTER, THE
BAILIFF AND CURTIS BAUGHMAN. MY ATTEMPTS TO HAVE SANCTIONS
BROUGHT ON THE PROOF WITH THE TRANSCRIPT THAT THE FIRST
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE HAS NO MERIT BUT BY BECK AND HIS COHORTS STILL RUNNIG AROUND TOWN MISREPRESENTING JUDGE
PALOMINO THIS CONTINUES TO CAUSE ME AND MY KIDS ABUSE!

Note PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL

DISCOVERY AND FOR SANCTIONS AND PLAINTIFFS AFFIRMATIVE
DEFENSES AND PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS, filed with the
court of Judge Crenshaw on March 23, 2004. Despite the facts showing the court that
Plaintiff has no intent to be in contempt of not replying to Interrogatories or Notices
to Produce but my answers were still within the law IF DENNY WOULD EVER
GET THE TRUTH FROM HIS CLIENT HE SOULD SEE MY ANSWER IS THE

86

INTERROGATORIES IS THE TRUTH AND NOT A LIE AS HIS CLIENTS ARE

DOING. My answers cannot be any more truthful than they are because of the threat
by Sheriff Deputy Howlett and Sheriff Deputy Jeffers and other people willing to lie
to have me put in jail for coming to the property as my membership rights allowed me
to do and to hear who heard Becks lies and the lies of these criminals lying about
hiding the money and their crimes of extortions on my family.
I was not allowed to put on a defense because my requests for production of
documents since back to Judge Arnold have been ignored by Denny.
MY MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS AND MOTIONS FOR REQUEST FOR
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS ARE NOT BEING ALLOWED TO BE
HEARD.
THE POSITIONS OF DENNY ARE TOTALLY OPPOSITE THE TRAIL OF
EVIDENCE OF THE ACTIONS TRUTHFULLY DONE BY HIS CLIENTS AND
DENNY IGNORS THE DOCUMENTS THAT THIS PLAINTIFF HAS
PRODUCED WHICH SHOW HIS CLIENTS WERE HIDING OVER $300,000.00
OF MONEY AND MAYBE MORE AND DO ADDITIONAL CRIMNAL ACTS.
THE EVIDENCE ALSO SHOWS THAT HIS CLIENTS HAVE PRODUCED LIE
UPON LIE TO THE COURT OF JUDGE PALOMINO AND TO THE COURTS OF
JUDGE ARNOLD AND JUDGE CRENSHAW AND JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE
ALLEGEDLY PASTORS AND LAWYERS AND SCRUGGS DID NOT PRESENT
MY CASE THESE COURTS HAVE TREATED ME AS SOME CRIMINAL. HOW
CAN BECK SAY I WAS UNSTABLE AND DID CRIMINAL ACTS AND WHILE
AT MY JOB AT THAT TIME I WAS A SUPERVISOR HOLDING DOWN
MANAGEMENT POSITIONS AT THE CITRUS PARK MALL OF SECURITY
GUARDS AND SHERIFF DEPUTIES AND A MAJOR CHAIN COMPANY WITH
50 PLUS PEOPLE AROUND ME?
RATHER THAN LOOKING AT THE EVIDENCE DENNY HAS JUST PUT
FORTH THE SAME DAMAGING LIES BECK HAS WITH NO ACT BY ME PER
THE STATEMENT OF BECK GIVING IT HIS BEST SHOT AND EVEN LYING
TO JUDGE PALOMINO. JUDGE PALOMINO THREW BECK OUT AND
NEVER STATED ANY ACT I HAD ALLEGEDLY DONE AMOUNTED TO
BEING CHARGED CRIMINALLY. HOW CAN DENNY PROMOTE FRAUDS
PRESENTED TO JUDGE PALOMINO THAT JUDGE PALOMINO THREW OUT
BUT DENNY STILL PUSHES THESE FRAUDS TO TAINT THE OPINION OF
JUDGE ARNOLD AND JUDGE CRENSHAW!!! A LAWYER CANNOT
TOTALLY MISREPRESENT THE FACTS PROVED IN ANOTHER CASE OR
COURT AND PRESENT OPPOSITE FACTS FROM THAT CASE TO A
DIFFERENT COURT!
As further evidence of the fraud by Beck to his attorney note the REQUEST FOR
ADMISSIONS prepared by Denny against this Plaintiff in November 2003, which the
position of Denny is a pure fraud to the evidence testified by Beck to the court and
from the Ruling of Judge Palomino to the Defendant. SINCE THE AMENDED
CASE WAS REFILED DENNY HAS YET TO SEND ANY REQUEST FOR
ADMISSIONS AND THOSE HE SOUGHT ARE PROVED TO BE HIS
POSITIONS HE TOOK TO JUDGE ARNOLD AND HE KNOWS NOW HE

87

PRESENTED PURE FRAUDS PROTECTING THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF HIS

CLIENTS.
JUDGE CRENSHAW WAS MADE AWARE IN HEARINGS THAT BECK HAS
CAUSED MULTIPLE LIES AGAINST ME TO EVEN RESTRICT ME FROM
SEEING MY KIDS AND SHE DID NOTHING TO STOP THIS ABUSE! NOTE
SPECIFICALLY THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE DECEMBER 15, 2003, HEARING
ON A MOTION FOR REHEARING HER DISMISSAL OF THE COUNTS OF THE
LAWSUIT AND DENYING MY ABILITY TO RE PLEAD AS THIS WOULD
ALLEGEDLY VIOLATE THE POSITION DENNY TOOK USING KOND AND
MALICKI--I EXPLAINED TO HER THEN AND IN EVERY HEARING IN 2004 YET SHE
ATTEMPTS TO WASH HER HANDS AND SAY THAT IS A FAMILY COURT
MATTER AND SHE IGNORES HOW MY KIDS HAVE BEEN HURT AND
ABUSED AND THIS FITS TO THE OPENING OF ABUSE THAT THE
SUPREME COURT ALLOWS A COURT TO REVIEW EVEN BY DENNYS
SMALL WINDOW! BUT ACTUALLY PER THE KOND AND MALICKI CASES
IT STATES: We conclude that the First Amendment does not provide a shield
behind which a church may avoid liability for harm caused to an adult and a child
parishioner arising from alleged sexual assault OR BATTERY by one of its clergy
EMPHASIS IS ON OR BATTERY! My Daughter and son express both physical
and mental and emotional battery from these acts of these pastors and their mom an
employee teacher at the school!
ALSO NOTE IN THE RULING BY JUDGE CRENSHAW THAT ALLOWING
THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH to benefit from the cause of action that Judge
Palomino threw out with no basis. This is saying I WAS BANNED FROM THE
PROPERTY BY THE DEFENDANTS EXTORTIONS, BUT I AM SUPPOSE TO
KNOW AND LIST ON INTERROGATORIES WHO WAS AT MEETINGS I
COULD NOT ATTEND OR BE ARRESTED AS A STALKER WHICH IS THE
BASIS OF THE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CASE. BECKS INTENTIONS
WAS KEEP ME FROM TALKING TO PEOPLE AND PEOPLE TALKING TO ME
AND THEN THIS JUDGE FINES ME FOR NOT BEING ABLE TO ANSWER A
QUESTION THAT I HAVE NO WAY TO ANSWER UNTIL THE CHURCH
BUSINESS RECORDS THAT DENNY HAS HID ALLOW ME TO START TO
KNOW WHAT WAS SAID ABOUT ME BEHIND MY BACK THAT THEY HAD
A ROBO COP OUT OF CONTROL SHERIFF DEPUTY THERE TO ARREST ME
TO PROTECT HIS TRUSTEE INTERESTS ALSO! THIS PROVES THE
CONSPIRACY!
In one hearing in March 31, 2004, the judge dismisses the action except for Beck
ignoring the PELLEGRINI v WINTER case cited herein and then when I go back just
a few short months later (JULY 9, 2004 AND AUGUST 10, 2004) this Judge states
that I have overburdened the court in just trying to do what the court said I need to
AMEND to do earlier. That was to connect the dots for the court how Beck acted on
and with support of others including permission with the whole church with approval
I can prove he gained with fraud and extortion on them and also this proving the
burden the court said as for one to scream ODIOUS AND OUTRAGEOUS by the
acts of all the participant defendants and staying within the alleged court ruled tight

88

restriction of the Malicious Prosecution rule that shows the mental, physical and
emotional abuse that all these defendants caused! I think that for a PRO SE this judge
has prejudice against me to make everything I do harder than Denny has had to do at
most hearings and also while I am not an attorney and trying to prove my divorce
case in multiple hearing at that 5 month period and also while trying to work about 80
hours a week! Denny gets caught telling lies that entrap me and he gets me to pay for
his work! This is a mockery and the bias that I have had to go to to prove malice and
the damages!
NOTE JULY 8, 2004, PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT
ON DEFENDANTS AND DEFENDANTS COUNSEL AND
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
And
MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE OF COURT COMPELING DEFENDANTS
TO ANSWER ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES
And
MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
And note that this was and still has not allowed to be heard as the tactic to allow
protections to the Defendant and his attorney even though the FIRST
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE STATEMENT IS A TOTAL FRAUD TO THE
TRANSCRIPT OF THE COURT OF JUDGE PALOMINO OF NOVEMBER 15,
2001.
ALSO NOTE PLAINTIFFS VERIFIED MOTION OBJECTING TO
DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT OF JANUARY,
2006, IN THE TOWNSEND V. BECK CASE 02-03812, AS PROOFS OF MORE
ISSUES AND FRAUDS STILL TO BE SETTLED!
SUMMARY POINT---ALL THE WAY UP TO THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OFFICE AND IN
OTHER STATE OFFICES LAWYERS CONFIRM CRENSHAW IS WRONG
ON KOND AND MALICKI BLOCKING ME SUING THESE MEMBERS AND
THE CHURCH AT LARGE BECAUSE OF THEY SUED ME FIRST!
THIS JUDGE IS BY HER ACTIONS EXPOSED AND ALERT TO THE
CRIMINAL ACTS DONE BY SCRUGGS, TURMEL AND DENNY AS THEY
LIED FOR THE PROTECTION OF THEIR FRAUDS TO THE COURTS. THE
ACTIONS BY JUDGE CRENSHAW CAN BE PROVED EVEN GREATER TO
SHOW SHE IS PART NOW OF THE COVERUP AND HARRASSMENT OF THIS
PRO SE TO IGNORE THAT THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THIS FATHER/HUSBAND/
DUTY BOUND TO THE OFFICES HE HELD AT THE CHURCH TO HOLD
HAVE BEEN ABUSED BY CRIMINAL ACTS BY THESE DEFENDANTS AND
ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES.
I DO NOT NEED TO SAY MORE AS THESE FACTS HAVE BEEN SAID IN
COURT PAPERS AFTER COURT PAPERS AND CRENSHAW IS JUST NOW
OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND STALLING BY HER OWN ACTIONS AND
ORDERS!
SHE HAS BEEN GIVEN EVERYTHING SHE NEEDED TO KNOW AND HEAR
FROM THE EVIDENCE IN THE CASE THAT SHOWED THE MALICIOUS

89

PROSECUTION ACTION IS REDRESS FROM BECK IN HIS OFFICE AS

PASTOR AND AS INDIVIDUAL AND TO PROTECT THE CHURCH THAT HE
BROUGHT INTO HIS LIES IS ALL OUTRAGEOUSLY AND ODIOUSLY
DOING ACTS STILL TODAY THROUGH THE INJUNCTION THAT ARE OUT
OF BOUNDS PER THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF WHAT CONDUCT THE BY-LAWS
TELLS THEM TO DO WHICH PER DENNY USING KOND THE SUPREME
COURT ALLOWS THE BY-LAWS TO BE USED TO SEE THAT THE
DEFENDANTS FOLLOWED THEIR OWN RELIGIOUS PROFESSED
STANDARDS AND DID CONDUCT THAT IS OUTSIDE THEIR RELIGIOUS
BELIEFS! THIS JUDGE KNOWS SHE HAS BEEN SHOWN AMPLE PROOFS!
ALSO WHEN DENNY DID NOT PRODUCE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT TO
HER RULING SHE GAVE HIM A CHANCE TO DO A VERBAL
ARGUMENT IN THE COURT THAT SAW HIM TRIP OVER HIS OWN
PRIOR WORDS BUT YET THIS JUDGE STILL RULED IN HIS FAVOR
SHOWING HER PREJUDICE AND ATTEMPT TO COVER UP THE
PROOFS DENNY NEEDS SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISBARMENT AND
HER AS WELL AS THEIR CONDUCT IS OUTRAGEOUS AND ODIOUS
AND NOT PER CIVIL PROCEEDURE!!!!!!!!!
ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF JUDGE GOMEZ
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT VIOLATED ARE:
RULE 4 AS A JUDGE HE IS ALSO TO ACT AS A LAWYER AND KNOWS THE
RULES THAT HE AND THE ATTORNEYS UNDER HIM IN HIS COURT ARE
REQUIRED TO FOLLOW. BUT THE ACTIONS HEREIN WILL SHOW HE
DEFILED HIMSELF, THE LITIGANTS, THE ATTORNEYS AND THE COURT.
CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
CANONS: I; II A; II B; III A(1); III A(2); III A(3); III A(4); III A(5); III B(1);
III B(1); III B(2); III B(3); III C(1)(a); III C(1)(b); III C(1)(c); III C(1)(c)iii;
III C(1)(c)iv;
FLORIDA STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS:
1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.1; 2.2; 2.4; 2.5; 2.8; 4.11; 4.21; 4.31(a); 5.11(b); 5.11(e); 5.11(f);
6.11; 6.32; 7.1; 9.22(b); 9.22(c); 9.22(d); 9.22g-j; 12.1(b)
JUDGE GOMEZ I CAN PROVE INTENTIONALLY COVERED UP THE
CONSPIRACY BY JUDGE TIMMERMAN AND TURMEL AND SCRUGGS AND
INTENTIONALLY LIED TO ME IN HIS COURT.
I did repeatedly requested hearings and did MOTIONS FOR:
REHEARING OCTOBER 1, 2003
Notarized PETITION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF FROM JUDGEMENT filed
February 24, 2004
REFERRAL TO GENERAL MASTER filed March 2, 2004
It was clear Judge Gomez disagreed with the rulings of Judge Timmerman as his words
to me through Judicial Assistant ANNICE GUNN was that the Judge was upset about the
facts of my case but that he did not have jurisdiction because of the appeal. HE ALSO
IN THE MARCH 29, 2004, HEARING EXPRESSED AN INTEREST TO GET THIS

90

CASE BACK WHEN THE APPEALS COURT HAD FINISHED THEIR RULINGS.
HE SEEMED INTERESTED THAT THE TIMMERMAN DECISIONS WERE SO
OUTRAGEOUS AS ANNICE GUNN TOLD ME!
I explained to Annice Gunn that due to the failure by Timmerman to notify me as a PRO
SE and his even after being told in the MOTION FOR REHEARING that I was PRO
SE he continues to work with SCRUGGS and TURMEL as if I dont HAVE ANY
RIGHTS TO DEFEND MYSELF. I now know that she had to inform Judge Gomez of
my accusations to her and that Judge Gomez did then act to continue the conspiracy as
Judge Gomez had Annice Gunn return to me his packet of the Motion For Referral to
General Master inclusive of the PETITION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF FROM
JUDGEMENT and copies prepared for him to send out to the parties about the referral.
MOTION FOR REFERRAL TO GENERAL MASTER WAS RETURNED TO ME
BY ANNICE GUNN BY HAND DELIVERY WHEN I WENT TO HER OFFICE AND
MY DEFENSE OF MY CASE WAS BLOCKED. Attached to the MOTION FOR
REFERRAL TO GENERAL MASTER, was the PETITION FOR EMERGENCY
RELIEF FROM JUDGEMENT which greatly again detailed as the MOTION FOR
REHEARING HAD DONE many elements of criminal acts by Timmerman, Scruggs
and Turmel and Judge Gomez just turned his head. Also now reading again the laws and
the transcripts of March 29, 2004 it is clear Judge Gomez and Turmel and Scruggs and
now Solomon and Gray joined into the conspiracy because GOMEZ saying he had read
the MOTIONS acted as if he did not know the basics of the case to even hear any issues
to get involved and later in the August hearing RECUSED himself allegedly before he
heard the acts and allegations of the case so he would not be in trouble with the Florida
Bar however his lies in the hearing that he does not know or want to know the case but he
does and had by his own words discussed the case EXPARTE with SCRUGGS per the
transcript and that SCRUGGS was not coming to the hearing.
ALSO JUDGE GOMEZ REALLY DOES NOT LET ME TALK BUT ONLY LETS
HEATHER GRAY AND STANFORD SOLOMON AND STACEY TURMEL DO THE
TALKING YET I WAS AS HEATHER GRAY TOLD THEM PRO SE AND HAD
MANY POINTS TO ARGUE ABOUT THE DELAYS AND ABUSE I HAD BEEN
GETTING IN TRYING TO GET A HEARING!
ALSO NOTE THE OCTOBER 12, 2004, TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING WITH
JUDGE SIERRA AND JUDGE SIERRA SHOWS CONFUSION THAT JUDGE
GOMEZ BELIEVED HE COULD NOT ACT ON A MOTION TO SET ASIDE OR AS I
CALLED IT A PETITION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF FROM JUDGEMENT!
WHO IS CONFUSED MORE BECAUSE THESE TWO JUDGES DO NOT EVEN
AGREE WHAT THEY CAN OR CANNOT DO AND IT SHOWS THIS AS JUST
ANOTHER EXCUSE TO GET OUT OF FINDING HOW THE JUDGES AND THE
ATTORNEYS CONTINUE TO AVOID GETTING MY FACTS HEARD NOT THE
FRAUDS CREATED BY SCRUGGS AND TURMEL AND KAREN AND HEATHER
GRAY AND THE JUDGES ACTING CONFUSED! THIS EVASION OF GETTING
TO THE FACTS CONTINUES TO JUST HURT THE POSSIBLITY OF ME GETTING
MY KIDS BACK! WHY DO I DESERVE BEING REQUIRED TO PROVE I AM NOT
VIOLENT OR HOSTILE WHEN I HAVE SHOWN NOW FOR 3 YEARS I HAVE
NOT EVEN SEEN MY KIDS AND I CAN SIT IN A COURT AND PUT UP WITH
ATTORNEYS ARGUING AND LYING ALL THE MORE JUST TO PROTECT

91

THEIR FRAUDS AND KEEPS ME FROM MY FAMILY AND RESTORING MY

INTEGRITY AND THEY WILL LOOSE THEIRS BECAUSE THEY TOLD THE LIES
AND I CONTINUE TO STILL TRY TO LEGALLY PROVE THE TRUTH!
I CONTINUE TO TRY TO GET THE INJUNCTION REMOVED FROM ME WHO
NEVER DID A VIOLENT ACT OR LIED OR STOLE FROM KIDS BUT THE ONES
WHO DID CONTINUE TO ABUSE MY KIDS! IS THERE ANY SANITY IN ANY
JUDGE!
SUMMARY POINT-----JUDGE GOMEZ VIOLATED THE LAW BY:
IGNORING THE ACTS DONE BY TIMMERMAN, TURMEL, SCRUGGS IN
CONSPIRACY ONCE THE CASE FILE WENT TO HIS CARE AND HE HAD A
DUTY TO TURN IN THESE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES TO THE FLORIDA
BAR AND TO THE JQC! HE ALSO HAD AN OBLIGATION AND RIGHT TO
GRANT AN INJUNCTION STOPPING THE RULINGS OF TIMMERMAN UNTIL
THE APPEAL COULD BE HEARD BASED ON THE RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 1.54. AND THE FRAUDS HE WAS AWARE OF BY
TIMMERMAN! NOTE THE REACTION OF JUDGE SIERRA ON OCTOBER 12,
2004 HEARING HIS BELIEF!
His stalling giving me a hearing until I had to get Heather Gray involved.
His openly in the transcript stating that he had EXPARTE contact with SCRUGGS
AFTER HE HAD READ THE FILE AND KNEW SCRUGGS HAD BEEN FIRED
AND FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURT RECORDS HE HAD READ
AND THEN IN OPEN COURT IN THE TRANSCRIPT TELL ME THAT HE AND
SCRUGGS DID NOT KNOW WHAT THIS IS ABOUT IS A PURE LIE AND
FRAUD!
IN THE MARCH 29, 2004, he would not let me even though there was disagreement
about my representing the facts as a PRO SE and arguing things that Heather Gray
had not even yet prepared for he blocked me by his trickery to not present or talk
since I was not one of the good old boy attorneys before him and from the transcript
one can clearly see I was shut up!
GOMEZ CLEARLY KNOWS WHAT RULES WERE BROKEN AND HE HAS BY
HIS OWN CHOICE JOINED IN THE CONSPIRACY TO COVER UP THE
CRIMES OF SCRUGGS AND THE OTHER ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES!
JUDGE GOMEZ MUST BE DISBARRED BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH HE
RECUSED HIMSELF HE KNEW ENOUGH THAT HE HAD A DUTY TO
REPORT THOSE WHO HAD VIOLATED THE COURT AND THE LAW AND
HE HAD A DUTY TO REPORT THESE VILE ACTS!

ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF JUDGE MONICA SIERRA

RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT VIOLATED ARE:
RULE 4 AS A JUDGE SHE IS ALSO TO ACT AS A LAWYER AND KNOWS THE
RULES THAT SHE AND THE ATTORNEYS UNDER HER IN HER COURT ARE
REQUIRED TO FOLLOW. BUT THE ACTIONS HEREIN WILL SHOW SHE
DEFILED HERSELF, THE LITIGANTS, THE ATTORNEYS AND THE COURT.

92

CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

CANONS: I; II A; II B; III A(1); III A(2); III A(3); III A(4); III A(5); III B(1);
III B(1); III B(2); III B(3); III C(1)(a); III C(1)(b); III C(1)(c); III C(1)(c)iii;
III C(1)(c)iv;
FLORIDA STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS:
1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.1; 2.2; 2.4; 2.5; 2.8; 4.11; 4.21; 4.31(a); 5.11(b); 5.11(e); 5.11(f);
6.11; 6.32; 7.1; 9.22(b); 9.22(c); 9.22(d); 9.22g-j; 12.1(b)

I CAN NOW PROVE THAT JUDGE SIERRA HAS KNOWLEDGE OF THE

CRIMINAL ACTS DONE BY THE WIFE, SCRUGGS, TURMEL AND
TIMMERMAN AND THE CONSPIRACY DONE BY GOMEZ AND TURMEL,
SCRUGGS, SOLOMON AND GRAY AND SHE CHOSE TO DO NOTHING TO
STOP THE ABUSE NOR DID SHE REPORT THESE ACTS IT APPEARS TO THE
JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMITTEE OR THE FLORIDA BAR. SHE
CHOSE TO PROTECT THE GOOD OLD BOY NETWORK AND VIOLATED THE
LAW!
First, things with her did not start out well in that her Judicial Assistant had given me a
hearing time and I confirmed it with her and forwarded the Notices. With the short
notice and the holiday the mail did not arrive but I had done my job correctly. It had
already been From August 16, 2004, when Judge Gomez removed himself and it took a
while for a Judge to be assigned. So once I found out which judge I had I jumped on the
first hearing time she had available. The Judicial Assistant was informed properly but
she failed to get the file ordered as I am a pro se and cannot order the file.
She has now had the case file for over a year and has been given multiple opportunities to
review my motions and my requests for her actions and every ruling by her is to avoid me
and not let me show how the crimes have been done in this case. Just because the
attorneys lied and I am trying to correct their damages is no reason for a court to ignore
the rights of this Pro Se handling the day to day needs of this case.
MAJOR POINT -------IN THE FILE WAS A MOTION FOR REFERRAL TO THE
GENERAL MASTER WHICH HAD BEEN BLOCKED BY THE COURT OF
JUDGE GOMEZ AND ALSO ATTACHED WAS A PETITION FOR
EMERGENCY RELIEF FROM JUDGEMEMT WHICH ALSO HAS NEVER
BEEN ALLOWED TO BE HEARD. THIS IS THE SAME THING AS SHE TOLD
ME AS A MOTION TO SET ASIDE AND DEALS WITH THE SAME ISSUES
THAT SHOULD BE ADDRESSED BY THE COURT IF JUSTICE IS TO BE
DONE AND THE FRAUDS BY KAREN AND TURMEL AND SCRUGGS AND
TIMMERMAN IS TO BE STOPPED!
Judge Gomez avoided this PETITION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF FROM
JUDGEMENT, saying he did not have jurisdiction yet this seemed to be questioned
by Judge Sierra as she wanted me to prove my statement that Judge Gomez
questioned that he had Jurisdiction in writing.
THESE JUDGES GET SO HUNG UP ON MY BEING A PRO SE AND IGNORE
WHAT I SAY WHICH ARE THE PURE TRUTHS AND LET THE ATTORNEYS

93

COME IN A LIE BUT BECAUSE THEY ARE ATTORNEYS THEY CAN ALL
LIE AS THEY HAVE DONE JUST LIKE THE JUDGES.
THE PETITION WAS THE RIGHT WAY TO GO WITH THE JUDGE BUT
AGAIN MY ATTEMPT AT JUSTICE WAS SIDESTEPPED!
DOES ANY ONE CARE ABOUT THE KIDS AND THE MESSAGE I BEG TO BE
HEARD!
MAJOR POINT------- THIS JULY 22, 2004, MOTION HAS CAUSED THE
COURTS OF JUDGE SIERRA AND JUDGE CRENSHAW TO SHOW ABUSE
TO ME THIS PRO SE AND HAS SHUT DOWN THESE JUDGES FROM DOING
THEIR DUTY TO SANCTION THE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES INVOLVED
FOR THE FRAUDS DONE TO THE COURTS.
ALSO THIS MOTION PUT THEM ON NOTICE THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE
ALERTED THE FLORIDA BAR AND THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS
COMMITTEE WHEN THEY BECAME KNOWLEDGABLE OF THE
WRONGDOINGS STATED THEREIN!
SINCE THIS MOTION BOTH COURTS HAVE EXPRESSED PREJUDICE
TOWARDS ME AS A PRO SE AND IGNORED MY REQUESTS FOR
SANCTIONS TOWARDS THE ATTORNEYS WHO DID THE FRAUD TO THE
COURT AND DID NO ACTIONS TO BECK OR KAREN OR SCRUGGS FOR
LYING ABOUT THE PALOMINO ORDER!
Her own words said she did not want to hear how Scruggs had lied to me his client
and then did not want to hear in full what Solomon had done before the court of
Judge Gomez!
WHERE IS THE JUSTICE IN THIS ACTION AGAINST ME---AGAIN BY THE
JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS?
On August 18, 2004, Stanford Solomon sent me a letter threatening me with Statue
57.105 unless I withdrew my MOTION FOR CONTEMPT from July 22, 2004.
ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2004, Stanford Solomon sent me a second letter as a threat that I
must withdraw my MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEY
FEES AND SANCTIONS or he would continue with his MOTIONS FOR
SANCTIONS AGAINST ME! I refused so the Judge Sierra stepped in a after hearing
the verbal arguments by Stanford Solomon without never hearing my argument in full or
reading my all my MOTIONS in full to understand the full case. Judge Sierra shows her
prejudice and dismissed Stanford Solomon with no SANCTIONS ON HIM! THIS IS
AN INJUSTICE THAT IN THE SAME COURT HE THREATENED ME AND THE
COURT REPORTER DENISE BRADLEY OF BERRYHILL WAS STUNNED AND
SHOCKED AT THE ABUSE SOLOMON YELLED OUT AT ME. HE FLIPPED OUT
TOTALLY!
I TOLD THE JUDGE WHAT HE AGREED TO DO TO HELP ME WITH MY KIDS
AS TOLD TO JUDGE GOMEZ AND I WAS TAUGHT THAT IF YOU MAKE A
PROMISE ESPECIALLY UNDER OATH AS ATTORNEYS ARE TO BE IN A
COURT TO A JUDGE THEN YOU SHOULD DO YOUR WORD OR BE IN
CONTEMPT! THAT IS WHY I SAID TO JUDGE SIERRA I COULD ORDER THE
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MARCH 29, 2004, HEARING AND PRODUCE THAT

94

EITHER HE LIED TO JUDGE GOMEZ THAT HE WAS GOING TO HELP ME

FIND MY KIDS OR HE LIED TO JUDGE SIERRA THAT HE NEVER MADE
THE PROMISE. THE LETTERS FROM HEATHER GRAY PROVE IN HER
APPEAL WITH EXHIBITS THAT SOLOMON DID MAKE THE PROMISES AND
THIS IS PROOF HE LIED TO JUDGE SIERRA IN HIS VERBAL REPLY TO HER!
THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING BEFORE JUDGE SIERRA ON OCTOBER
12, 2004, reveals Stanford Solomon presented a multiple of deceptions to the court but
Judge Sierra was so anti this pro se she was not willing to listen or read in full the
Motions sent by this Pro Se. It just appears again where a Pro Se is automatically a
victim no matter what the evidence shows the attorneys do to lie and then lie more and
the judges do not want the facts!
Her court has now refused to grant me hearings and nor has her J.A. returned phone calls.
Her attempt to stay out of this was to finally order the first mediation in this case as Judge
Timmerman should have done before granting the Divorce Judgements.
This ordering the Mediation was a side-step to not granting my MOTION FOR
EMERGENCY RELIEF to stop the expired due to time and amount of money paid on
the Garnishments of the Child Support.
Instead she lied to me that this did not amount to EMERGENCY status however
Solomon was able to get his EMERGENCY Motion hearing which was not even as much
dollars involved!
DO THESE JUDGES THINK I AM THAT STUPID!
THEY TREAT ME LIKE SOME DUMB IDIOT! I KNOW WHEN I AM BEING LIED
TO AT LEAST ABOUT THIS JUDGE BEING IN THE COVER UP AND LYING TO
ME! SHE HAD HER CHANCE TO BE HONEST AND DO RIGHT AND CORRECT
THE WRONGDOING BUT HAVE VIOLATED HER OATH!
SIERRA HAS BIAS TO ME AS A PRO SE AND HAS IGNORED THE
VIOLATIONS OF LAW IN MY CASE FILES THAT ARE STATED VERY
CLEARLY IN THE MOTIONS PRESENTED TO HER AND THE PREVIOUS
JUDGES! SHE HAS IGNORED THE FRAUDS BY THE JUDGES AND THE
ATTORNEYS AND THE FORMER WIFE!
JUDGE SIERRA LET SOLOMON OFF THE HOOK BASED ON HIS FRAUDS
TO HER ON OCTOBER 12, 2004 AND SIGNED THE ORDER AND SHOULD
HAVE AT LEAST READ THE FILE THAT THEY COULD NOT FIND
BECAUSE THEY THOUGHT IT WAS STILL WITH THE APPEALS COURT
AND MY MOTIONS TO PROVE HIS DAMAGES BEFORE SHE DISMISSED
HIM FROM THE WRONGDOINGS BASED ON THE PROOFS THIS PRO SE
HAD TO PRESENT INCLUDING VALID LETTERS FROM ATTORNEY
HEATHER GRAY!
Per the judges reasoning an attorney can be found in contempt of court when the
court finds proof the attorney is intentionally lying to the court! A court has power
over persons appearing before the court to protect its integrity!
Just again the week of November 4, 2005, Judge Sierra shows her prejudice and
refusal to listen to my MOTIONS as she denied my Motion that I have already
overpaid the former wife by over $2000.00 saying my MOTION was insuffient but

95

Solomon got an emergency hearing for a $900.00 house payment. Prejudice against
a Pro Se again.
She is scared to have me in her court for any hearing and continues to deny my
right to address how the attorney and judges have frauded me.
SHE HAS NOT RECUSED HERSELF AS SHE SHOULD HAVE DONE PER THE
CANONS NOW THAT WITH THESE LATEST MOTIONS SHE CAN SEE THAT
SOLOMON HAD TAINTED HER VIEWS BY HIS VERBAL REPLY IN COURT
ON OCTOBER 12, 2004.
SUMMARY POINT; JUDGE SIERRA BY HER OWN ACTIONS HAS SHOWN
HER PARTICIPATION IN COVER UP OF THE CRIMES DONE TO ME AS
THEY ARE IN THE FILES PLAINLY FOR HER TO SEE THE ABUSE ON ME
AND MY KIDS. SHE HAS AND CONTINUES TO BE WILLING TO HARASS
ME EVEN MORE AND REFUSES CONTINUALLY MY ACCESS TO THE
COURTS!
SHE SHOWED HER PREJUDICE AND REFUSED TO LISTEN TO THIS PRO
SE AND IGNORED THE LIES AND FRAUDS DONE BY THE ATTORNEYS
AND THE PRIOR JUDGES.
SHE ALSO DID NOTHING TO REVERSE THE DAMAGES OR REPORT
THESE LAWYERS AND JUDGES FOR THEIR FRAUDS ON THE COURT AND
ABUSE ON THE KIDS AND THIS FATHER!
SHE HAS AS A JUDGE SHOWED NO COMPASSION ON HOW THE KIDS
HAD BEEN TREATED AS THE FATHER SOUGHT TO KNOW!
SHE MUST BE DISBARRED!
ACTS TO INVESTIGATE OF JUDGE MANUEL MENENDEZ JR.
CHIEF JUDGE
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT:
RULE 4 AS A CHIEF JUDGE HE IS ALSO TO ACT AS A LAWYER AND
KNOWS THE RULES THAT HE AND THE JUDGES AND THE ATTORNEYS
UNDER HIM IN HIS COURT ARE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW. BUT THE ACTIONS
HEREIN WILL SHOW HE DEFILED HIMSELF, THE LITIGANTS, AND THE
COURT AND PROTECTED HIS JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS WITH PREJUDICE
AND BIAS!
CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
CANONS: I; IIA; IIB; IIIA(a); III. A(4); III. B(1); III. B(3);
It is now very obvious that my kids and I have been abused by the entire court system of
Hillsborough County. When Judge Timmerman practiced his violations of process and I
could not get a hearing from any judge or get the case assigned to a General Master or
Mediation or Arbitration and being told that only the Appeal was the route to use and that
that could take many months I went to the Administrative Offices and spoke with LYNN
Meehan multiple times and expressed to her the FULL details of the case. I ALSO
SHOWED HER THE PROOFS THAT JUDGE TIMMERMAN AND TURMEL AND
SCRUGGS HAD VIOLATED MY RIGHTS AS A PRO SE AND PROVED TO HER
THE EXPARTE ACTS DONE IN SIGNING THE AMENDED DISSOLUTION OF

96

MARRIAGE JUDGEMENT AND THE GARNISHMENTS AND THE LETTERS

THAT SCRUGGS DRAFTED THAT SHOWED HE WAS WORKING CONSPIRACY
BEHIND MY BACK! She informed me that as we interacted multiple times that
DECEMBER 2003, day that she was going back and forth to the office of Judge
Menendez and to the staff attorneys and they were going to look into the injustice in this
case and to how it broke down. It was very clear with the actions that Timmerman did
and then his transfer that Judge Menendez did his actions with my case in mind to protect
the court and not help me this victim of his courts. THIS IS NOT JUSTICE AND
MENENDEZ failed to do his duty to the FLORIDA BAR and the JUDICIAL
QUALIFICATIONS COMMITTEE and RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AS SHOWN
THROUGHOUT HEREIN.
JUDGE MENENDEZ has now had multiple months to watch and correct the actions by
Timmerman, Gomez, Sierra, and Crenshaw to ignore my rights and he himself ignores
my pleas in the MOTIONS AND MANY REQUESTS FOR HEARINGS.
HE MUST BE DISBARRED FOR HIS GROSS INCOMPETENCE AND
PARTICIPATION IN THE FRAUDS AS STATED HEREIN WITH THE PROOFS
THAT ARE IN CASE FILES AND CAN STILL BE ENLARGED!
PART FOUR:
After speaking with the Florida Bar, Ted Littlewood and others it was determined that
simple discussions could not cure these matters. Therefore, this report is now in your
care.
I HAVE SPOKEN TO MANY ATTORNEYS AND BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
IN THIS STATE! THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OFFICE AND OTHER
AGENCIES WILL BE LOOKING FOR THE FLORIDA BAR AND THE JUDICIAL
QUALIFICATIONS TO DISBAR THESE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES OR OTHER
SANCTIONS AS SHOWN HERE!
AFTER REVIEWING THE ISSUES HEREIN IT APPEARS MOST OF THE
ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES INVOLVED SHOULD BE DISBARRED AS NOW
REVIEWING ALL OF MY PLEAS TO EACH OF THEM THEY HAVE JUST
IGNORED THE SAFETY OF MY KIDS AND THE ABUSE THEY STILL INCUR
AND DO NOT EVEN KNOW HOW THEIR MOM HAD HARMED AND STILL
HARMS THEM AS I LEARNED OF EVIDENCE OF ABUSE THEY SUFFER JUST
THIS NOVEMBER 2005!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I HAVE EXPRESSED ENOUGH INFORMATION HEREIN TO REQUIRE THAT
IMMEDIATE ACTIONS BE TAKEN TO REMOVE THESE CRIMINALS FROM
CONTINUING THEIR ABUSE ON OTHERS AND MY CASE AS IT SHOWS THEY
HAVE GREATLY DEPARTED FROM CIVIL LAW AND ETHICS.
I WILL BE WATCHING WHAT ACTIONS THE FLORIDA BAR AND THE
JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMITTEE AND THE GOVERNORS OFFICE
DOES TO STOP THESE CRIMINALS IMMEDIATELY.
I WANT JUSTICE AND IF I HAVE TO GO TO THE LOCAL MEDIA AND THE
NATIONAL MEDIA TO GET THESE PEOPLE BEHIND BARS AND THE KEY
THROWN AWAY I WILL USE THE MEDIA AND ANY GOVERNMENT

97

AGENCY I CAN TO GET MY KIDS HELP!

LEGALLY!!!!!!!!!!!!! BUT YOUR
TIME TO ACT WILL BE CLOSELY MONITORED AS I AM NOT A PUSH
OVER AND WILL PURSUE THIS MATTER UNTIL I DIE!

PROOF OF THE CONSPIRACY BY TIMMERMAN, SCRUGGS,

TURMEL AND OTHERS AS PROVED HEREIN!
On September 22, 2003, was the last hearing before Judge Timmerman in which he
denied in the 15 minute hearing and ruled on ORDER ON HUSBANDS MOTION
TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE brought by SCRUGGS and not me as a PRO SE and then
had his J.A. chase me down the hall and show me the RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEEDURE BOOK AND THE RULE THAT JUDGE TIMMERMAN TOLD
HER TO POINT TO AND MAKE ME READ IT FROM HIS BOOK!
NO OTHER MATTERS WERE DISCUSSED!
On or about September 19, 2003, Stacey Turmel prepared and faxed to SCRUGGS a
Draft Divorce Final Judgement. THIS WAS DISCUSSED WITH SCRUGGS IN HIS
CONFERENCE ROOM AND A DEMAND FOR A NEW HEARING WAS
REGECTED BY SCRUGGS AGAINST THE WILL OF THIS CLIENT! NOTE:

This TURMEL draft does not say the home is to be sold.

ON SEPTEMBER 29-30 was the phone calls and meeting with
Scruggs in his conference room where he was fired after he told me
his plan to ignore my rights so he could stay on the judges good
side! THIS IS AGAINST THE DUTY TO HIS CLIENT! AGAIN!

On October 1, 2003, this Plaintiff filed his PRO SE, MOTION FOR REHEARING
On October 3, 2003, Charles Scruggs, having been FIRED and knowing he was fired
still prepared and sent to Judge Timmerman his proposed Draft of the Divorce
Judgement despite being told to stay out of the matters. Scruggs was fired in his
Conference room and instead chose to act EXPARTE with the COURTS.
October 10, 2003, Judge Timmerman Denied my PRO SE, MOTION FOR
REHEARING, and even mailed to this PRO SE and to TURMEL AND SCRUGGS
his ORDER DENYING THE MOTION CLEARLY INFORMING ALL THAT THIS
PLAINTIFF WAS PRO SE. The testimony of Stanford Solomon in his testimony to
Judge Gomez alerts Scruggs and Turmel and TIMMERMAN to DEAL WITH ME
AS A PRO SE not behind my back AS THEY DID FROM SEPTEMBER 30 EVEN
TILL NOW BY MANY EXPARTE MEETINGS WITH THE JUDGES!
OCTOBER 21, 2003, Stacey Turmel sends another version of a FINAL
JUDGEMENT to the judge saying our FINAL JUDGMENT for Dissolution of
Marriage which more adequately reflects the Courts ruling BUT IT ALLEGED
FACTS NOT DECIDED BY THE JUDGE IN MY PRESENCE AS A PRO SE!
THIS HAS IN A HANDWRITTEN NOTE HOLD 10/29 WHY?!!!!!
ON OCTOBER 31, 2003, TIMMERMAN SIGNED A FINAL JUDGEMENT OF
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE THAT I HAD NEVER AS A PRO SE SEEN
BEFORE IT WAS SIGNED OR PRESENTED TO THE COURT AGAIN BY
EXPARTE ILLEGAL COMMUNICATIONS AND

98

 ON OCTOBER 31, 2003, Judge Timmerman signed the FINAL DISPOSITION

FORM and removed himself from the case!
NOVEMBER 3, 2003, the FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR DISSOLUTION OF
MARRIAGE is stamped as filed by the clerk of the court. A NEW VERSION
THIS PRO SE HAD NOT BEFORE SEEN UNTIL AFTER IT WAS FILED!
NOVEMBER 3, 2003, the FINAL DISPOSITION FORM is stamped as filed by the
clerk stating, with the box marked (x) Disposed by Judge.
November 11, 2003, another conformed copy of the Final Judgement is sent to the
court of Judge Timmerman by Samaira Cervantes, legal assistant to Stacey
Turmel.and not sent to this PRO SE or to Scruggs.
********NOVEMBER 14, 2003 I have a receipt from the clerk of the court for two
pages of copies which were the FINAL DISPOSITION FORM and the
OCTOBER 21, 2003 letter from Stacey Turmel to Judge Timmerman alleging to
be forwarded to the Judge a final judgement that more adequately reflects the
courts rulings. I HAD NOT AS A PRO SE BEEN SENT OR BEEN COPIED
ON EITHER DOCUMENT TO KNOW THEY EXISTED AS STATED
HEREIN.
NO COPY OF THE PROPOSED ORDER IS IN THE COURT FILE AT THAT
TIME OR I WOULD HAVE PAID TO HAVE A COPY OF THAT ENTIRE
LETTER AND PROPOSED ORDER SO I COULD KNOW WHAT TO
ARGUE ABOUT THE CONTENTS BUT ONLY THE COVER PAGE
LETTER IS PRESENT. THE COURT OF JUDGE TIMMERMAN WITHOUT
MY KNOWLEDGE OF THIS PRO SE SIGNED IT AND IT WAS NOT IN
THE CASE FILES I REVIEWED IN THE CLERKS OFFICE ON
NOVEMBER 14, 2003.
ON THE ORDER LATER SIGNED AND ENTERED IN THE COURT ON
DECEMBER 3, 2003, is stamped RETURN TO FAMILY LAW so the
suggested order was in the care of the judge and I could not get to it as I was
being denied anything from the Judicial Assistant of TIMMERMAN.
The cover letter of October 21, 2003 is stamped received at the court but has a
handwritten note on the top of the letter written HOLD 10/29.
THE AMOUNTS OF GARNISHMENT FROM THE FINAL JUDGEMENT
BEING AT $653.63 jumped to $747.87 in the AMENDED FINAL
JUDGEMENT
DECEMBER 15, 2003 was the first garnishment from my paycheck and I did
not receive any prior notice of this right before Christmas when put a total hurt
on my buying presents for the family
December 17, 2003 is the date stamped on the letter from Judge Timmerman
with enclosed is the CHILD SUPPORT INCOME DEDUCTION ORDER only
showing it was stamped by Judge on December 15, 2003 behind the back of this
pro se by the fraud of judge Timmerman, his judicial assistant, Turmel and
Scruggs.
On November 20, 2003 a letter from Scruggs is sent to this Pro Se including an
AMENDED FINAL JUDGEMENT OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
stamped by Judge Timmerman on November 18, 2003, and since I HAD NOT
YET SEEN THE ALLEGED FINAL JUDGEMENT I HAD NO IDEA WHAT
99

THEY WERE DOING TO TRICK ME NOW WITH AN AMENDED FINAL

JUDGEMENT THAT WAS NOT MAILED TO ME PRIOR TO SCRUGGS
PRESENTING IT TO THE JUDGE KNOWING HE HAD BEEN FIRED! AND
SO THIS IS EVIDENCE OF EXPARTE CONTACT WITH THE JUDGE
AFTER THE CLIENT FIRED HIS ATTORNEY!
IT WAS NOT UNTIL DECEMBER 2, 2003, that I was able to from the Clerks
file get a copy of the FINAL JUDGEMENT stamped as file November 3, 2003, so
I immediately went home and prepared the NOTICE OF APPEAL and filed and
paid the APPEAL charges to stay within the 30 day appeal rule otherwise the
trickery of JUDGE TIMMERMAN AND STACEY TURMEL AND CHARLES
SCRUGGS WOULD HAVE LOST MY RIGHT TO APPEAL WHICH LATER
HEATHER GRAY MESSED UP ANYWAY TO COVER UP THIS FRAUD
DONE BY HER FRIENDS AT THE ILL WILL OF HER CLIENT.
I attended every noticed hearing from January 29, 2003, through September 30,
2003 and at no time was the sale of the home requested by either party to be
done immediately as I was living in the house in January 30, 2003, when the
hearing was done. NO evidence was ever allowed to be presented as to the
former wifes written claims on the home which Scruggs had full possession of
those documents including the affidavit the wife presented in 2001 to Judge
Palomino claiming the money should go to the husbands parents and also note
the October 3, 2003 proposed draft to Judge Timmerman by the Scruggs letter
in point 6 states That the parties own the former marital home along with the
Husbands parents, and therefore if the former marital home is sold both the
Husband and the Wife are entitled to one-quarter (1/4) of the net profit. The
Husband currently resides in said home and has been paying all bill associated
with this home.
SO TO SEE VERSION 2 and 3 and 4 and 5 and 6 or more DRAFTS as the final
and amended Judgments shows that there was much done behind the back of
this PRO SE THAT THE COURT NOTICED BY MAIL EVERY ONE FROM
OCTOBER 10, 2003 that this RESPONDANT/PLAINTIFF/VICTIM/FATHER
was PRO SE for his rights and for the rights of his children!
IT APPEARS AS IF UP TO 6 or more versions of Judgments were done without
my consent and behind the back of this PRO SE and multiple phone calls being
done behind the back of this pro se with SCRUGGS AFTER HE WAS FIRED in
an attempt to cause me additional financial harm and cause the home to be sold
which Scruggs knew the wife had no financial interest in the partnership of the
home as he had even gone to the extent of in January 29, 2003 preparing for the
wife to sign a quick claim deed releasing her from the home. His secretary
messed it up and had it reversed me selling to her and Scruggs took it back to
have it redone. So Scruggs intentionally went from her having no interest to
giving her interest and ignoring the fact that the wife and husband had
incurred about $100,000.00 debt from the asset value of the home to the
husbands parents! WHAT ANOTHER FRAUD!
By law a billing showing these hours and minutes of work and phone calls
should have been supplied to me but as yet SCRUGGS had hid these records of
his deceptionS!

100

 AS A FUTHER ACT TO SO COERSION TO VIOLATE MY RIGHTS I WAS

DENIED GETTING A HEARING ON ANY MATTERS WITH THE COURTS
OF JUDGE TIMMERMAN OR JUDGE GOMEZ AS A PRO SE! IT WAS
NOT UNTIL HEATHER GRAY CONTACTED THE COURT AFTER MY
REPEATED FAILURES AND GOT A HEARING FOR FEBRUARY 6, 2004,
AND THEN THIS HEARING AT THE LAST MINUTE WAS CANCELLED
BY ANNICE GUNN CALLING ME AND SAYING SHE HAD BEEN TOLD
THAT STACEY TURMEL HAD AN ORDER FROM JUDGE TIMMERMAN
THAT CANCELLED THE HEARING BEFORE JUDGE GOMEZ AND
TOOK IT OUT OF HIS JURISDICTION. THIS IS LATER TO BE PROVED
AS A FRAUD AND AN INTENTIONAL DELAY TACTIC. IT IS THEN
THAT EFFORTS TO RESCHEDULE WERE DONE WITH HEATHER
GRAY AND JUDGE GOMEZ AND RESCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH 29,
2004 HEARING IN WHICH STACEY TURMEL DID NOT ATTEND AND
THE SERVICES OF STANFORD SOLOMON WERE RETAINED AND HE
WALKED INTO THIS MATTER CARRYING FOR THE FRAUDS AND LIES
DONE BY EVEN THE JUDGE TIMMERMAN AND STACEY TURMEL AND
CHARLES SCRUGGS AND THE FORMER WIFE AND THE CHURCH
PASTOR AND MEMBERS NOW UNDER HIS NEGLIGENT CONTROL!
EVEN THE FORMER WIFE WAS TO APPEAL TELEPHONICALLY ON
MARCH 29, 2004, BUT SHOWED UP WITH HER DAD WHO OUTSIDE THE
COURT STARTED TO ATTACK THIS PRO SE AND HE HAD TO BE
RESTRAINED BY STANFORD SOLOMON AND HEATHER GRAY!
STANFORD SOLOMON DID A MOTION TO PUT ME IN CONTEMPT FOR
THE RULINGS THAT TIMMERMAN, TURMEL, SCRUGGS DID BEHIND
MY BACK WHILE I WAS A PRO SE! STANFORD SOLOMON HAD
OPPORTUNITY AND WAS REQUIRED TO READ THE MOTIONS
SUBMITTED BY THIS PRO SE IN THE COURT FILES BUT
NEGLIGENTLY DID NOT READ THE FILES BEFORE THE MARCH 29,
2004 HEARING BASED ON HIS WORDS TO ME AS HE SAID HE TOOK
FROM THE BROTHER OF THE FORMER WIFE TOLD HIM AND HAD
SENT TO HIM AS THE BROTHER IS EMPLOYED BY ONE OF HIS
LARGER CLIENTS AND HE TOOK THE CASE BLINDLY AS A FAVOR!
On February 3, 2004, I also as a PRO Se filed by mail the appeal on the
Townsend v Beck Case which to ignore the issues the court ruled them as
untimely however this position of Judge Crenshaw ignored:
Pellegrini v. Winter that the other defendants and the entire church have been
involved in HATE CRIMES against me and my children and have involved
themselves to promote and require RON BECK AS THE PASTOR TO FILE
THE CHARGES BEFORE JUDGE PALOMINO WHICH WAS THE BASIS
FOR THE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CLAIM
AND WOULD POINT OUT THAT DENNY HAS YET TO PROVE ANY
SUPREME COURT REQUIRED THRESHOLD PROTECTIONS THAT
KOND OR MALICKI REQUIRE TO PROTECT THESE TORT HATE
CRIME ACTIONS FROM BEING UNDER THE ENTANGLEMENT CLAUSE
AND THAT THE ABUSE ON MY KIDS BY THESE PASTORS OF A

101

PRIVATE SCHOOL ARE NOT INTENTIONAL HATE CRIMES TO ABUSE

CHILDREN THIS WAS NOT PREMATURE BUT IS LETTING CRIMINALS
CONTINUE TO ABUSE MY KIDS WHO NEED MAJOR HELP EVERY
DAY!
EVERY ATTORNEY AND EVERY JUDGE NEEDS TO BE DISBARRED
DUE TO THE EVENTS FROM JANUARY 30, 2003 STILL TO NOW THAT
HAVE BEEN DONE AND REPORTED IN THE FILES OF THE VILE ACTS
BY THESE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS IN MY MANY MOTIONS AND
NOT ONE OF THEM HAVE STEPPED FORWARD TO CORRECT THIS
GROSS ERRORS OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
I HAVE POINTED OUT FRAUDS AND SEVER DAMAGE DONE TO THE
CHILDREN AND THESE ALLEGED ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES JUST
MAKE CRIMES EVEN WORSE ON MY KIDS WHO I HAVE NOW NOT
SEEN FOR OVER 3 YEARS BECAUSE THESE CRIMINAL JUDGES HAVE
THE POWER FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN TO COVER UP FOR
THEIR CRIMES THAT THEY ORDER AND PUT ME IN JAIL AND
CONTINUE TO IGNORE MY RIGHTS AS A FATHER!
PER THE LEGAL ADVICE I HAVE RECEIVED-----ALL ACTS DONE BY
SCRUGGS, TURMEL AND TIMMERMAN INCLUDING SIGNING THE
FINAL JUDGEMENT, THE AMENDED FINAL JUDGEMENT AND THE
GARNISHMENTS AND ANY ACT THEREAFTER SHOW THEIR ILLEGAL
CONSPIRACY AND FRAUD AND EACH OF THESE DOCUMENTS ARE AS
A MATTER OF LAW------NULL AND VOID AND PROOF OF TORTS!
THESE ACTIONS SHOW THE CRIMINAL FRAUDS DONE BY SCRUGGS ON
HIS OWN CLIENT SINCE 2001 AND HOW HIS MALPRACTICE WORKED
THE CONSPIRACY WITH THE JUDGES AND THE ATTORNEYS FOR THE
WIFE AND FOR THE ALLEGED PASTOR IN PURE DECEPTIONS FIRST OF
THE COURT AND THE CLIENTS AND THEN WITH FULL COOPERATION
OF THE COURT OF JUDGE TIMMERMAN AND GOMEZ AND SIERRA AND
ATTORNEY GRAY AND ATTORNEY SOLOMON AND OTHERS THAT
ALLOW THIS FRAUD! SINCE THE RECORDS SHOW THAT THE COURTS
OF CRENSHAW AND PALOMINO AND CHIEF JUDGE MENENDEZ, JR AND
ATTORNEY DENNY HAVE BEEN NOTICED OF THESE FRAUDS AND NONE
HAVE YET TRIED TO REPORT THESE FRAUDS THEY HAVE ALL
PRACTICED OBSTRUCTIONS OF JUSTICE AND SHOULD BE TREATED AS
CRIMINALS!
I HAVE ALREADY REVIEWED HOW OTHERS HAVE BEEN DISBARRED
FOR LESS TO STOPPING SHORT OF DISBARMENT AND CRIMINAL
CHARGES BEING FILED IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!
CITED CASE LAWS AND FLORIDA STATUES AND PRINCIPLES OF LAW:

102

Jane Doe v William Dunbar Evans, III Church of Holy Redeemer, Inc; the Diocese
of Southeast Florida; and Calvin O. Schofield, Jr. SC94450 of Florida March 14,
2002.
Doe v. DORSEY, 683 So. 2d 614, 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
Donna Gracey v. Donald W. Eaker SCOO-153, 837 So2d 348 (Fla. 2002)
MALICKI v. DOE 814 So2d 347 (Fla. 2002) SC01-179
KOND v MUDRYK 769 So. 2d 1073;
OKEEFE v. OREA 731 So2d 680 686 Fla, 1st DCA 1998
GOODMAN v. TEMPLE SHIR AMI, INC, et.al. 712 So 2d 775; FLA 1998. App.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v ERNEST D. McCARSON,
Sr. 467 So. 2d 277; 1985 Fla.
LEVIN et.al v United States Fire Insurance Co. 639 So2d. 606; 1994
WRIGHT 446 So2d at 1164
FLORIDA STATUES:
415--- Protection from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation
455--- Regulation of Professions and Occupations;
458--- Medical Practice
607--- CORPORATIONS
617--- CORPORATIONS NOT FOR PROFIT
617.10 CORPORATIONS NOT FOR PROFIT- Bylawsbefore membership
shall cease against his consent he shall be given an opportunity to be heard,
766--- MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND RELATED MATTERS
768--- NEGLIGENCE, Civil action for Punitive damages
770--- Civil action for libel
772--- Civil Remedies For Criminal Practices
777--- Principle; Accessory; Attempt; Solicitation; Conspiracy
784--- Assault; Battery; Culpable Negligence
787-- CUSTODY OFFENSES
812--- THEFT
817.15Making false entries, etc., on books of corporation.
817.21BOOKS to be evidence in such cases.
817.29---Cheating /gross fraud
817.61---Fraudulent use of credit cards
817.49False reports of commission of crimes; penalty
827-- Abuse of Children
836--- Defamation; Libel; Threatening Letters and Similar Offenses
836.11Publications which tend to expose persons to hatred, contempt, or ridicule
837--- Perjury

103

839--- Offenses by Public Officer and Employees

843--- OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE
870.02--- Affrays; Riots; Routs; Unlawful assemblies
871.01---Disturbing schools and religious and other assemblies.
871.02---Indictments or informations for disturbing assembly
876---Criminal anarchy,
877--- MISCELLANEOUS CRIMES
895---Offenses Concerning Racketeering RICO
914 ---Witnesses, witness tampering, perjury
PRINCIPLES OF LAW:
ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
ECCLESIASTICAL LAW
ENTANGLEMENT RULE
THRESHOLD RULE
IN SUMMARY:
I, RANDALL C TOWNSEND, represent matters, true, herein to the best of my
ability and also remind these offices that these defendants, attorneys, and judges
have blocked many requests for discovery, did many exparte acts behind the back of
this pro se and did intentionally misrepresent acts and case laws that would greatly
affect the understanding of this PRO SE. I confirm that the facts as presented in
light of the information available to me is true and later production of documents
and testimony may enlighten and expand the scope of understanding and then the
need for additional comments and actions.
Further, in making inquires of key questions of law pointed out herein, some
answers were even conflicting.
An example of this point even goes to if the Divorce is GRANTED, as since the Final
Judgement and the Amendment Judgement and Garnishment was done Exparte
and (1) this Pro Se had never seen the Documents as multiple drafts (2) due to the
frauds by these attorneys and judges (3) after counsel had been fired (4) and an
Amended Judgement with the same conditions precedent as pointed out in (1-3),
was signed after the Judge signed the order of Dismissal then these JUDGEMENTS,
AMENDED JUDGEMENTS AND GARNISHMENTS and the actions by Gomez
and Sierra enforcing resulting actions from these documents of fraud may appear to
be null and void! With Judge Gomez not allowing this Pro Se to pursue the Motions
before his court and with Judge Sierra now since October 12, 2004, taking evasive
actions and even not returning phone calls or granting court hearings from this Pro
Se then this matter is if proved Null and Void would confirm the frauds of the
courts and the attorneys! This then results in flowing upstream to the root cause
which is that proof based on Turmel and Karen Harrod Townsend in presenting
frauds to Judge Timmerman were relying on fraud from Ron Beck and the
attorneys for the defendants in Townsend v Beck which then flows from Becks and
the Church frauds to cause the damages of this divorce action. These actions then
prove further rights of this Plaintiff/father so redress as damages from the
Malicious Prosecution! NO ATTORNEY WANTS THIS MESS! BUT I HAVE A

104

RIGHT TO KNOW AND HAVE ACCESS TO THE COURTS TO PROVE AND

RESOLVE THESE ISSUES AND OTHER MATTERS AS STATED HEREIN!
RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the above herein has provided by U.S.
Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested this ________________ day of November,
2005, to THE HONORABLE JEB BUSH, via Raquel Rodriquez, General Counsel,
Legal Affairs, PL05 The Capitol 400 South Monroe Street, Tallahassee, FL 323990001, and to The Judicial Qualifications Commission, 1110 Thomasville Road,
Tallahassee, Fl, 32303, and to The Florida Bar Suite C-49 Tampa Airport Marriott
Hotel, Tampa, Fl 33607-1442.
BY:___________________
RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE
P.O. BOX 21,
ODESSA, FL 33556
(941) 350 - 2677

105