Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Distress
Explanation
This stress results when people consider situations difficult or
impossible to deal with.
It is the bodys reaction to certain physical stressors.
It is a short term reaction to an immediate threat.
This results from ongoing situations.
Eustress is a positive stress resulting from meeting challenges and
difficulties with the expectation of achievement. This kind of stress is
energising and motivating.
As stress increases, it reaches a point at which the effects become
negative. If a high level of stress continues for a prolonged period,
distress or bad stress occurs.
Cons;
-
Potential Heart Attacks; high levels of pressure including changes in metabolism, increase of
heartbeat and breathing rate and an increase in blood pressure may lead to headaches and
potential heart attacks.
Dissatisfaction; employees who experience high levels of stress are those who are least satisfied
with their jobs.
Tension, Anxiety, Boredom, Irritability and Procrastination.
Rapid Speech
Sleep disorders
Low productivity and performance.
Topic 6
1) What are the stages of Group Development?
Forming
This is an ice-breaking stage, which is also known as mutual acceptance. During this stage, all
members of a group meet for the first time.
At this point of time, members usually tend to avoid interacting with one another and will try to
act independently. They will attempt to identify what needs to be done, what needs to be accepted
and things to avoid within the group. The existing discomfort diminishes when members get to
know each other better and accept their presence as members of a new group.
This stage is also a stage of uncertainty (about the purpose of the group, power relations and
interpersonal relations) and emphasis is placed on orientation and adaptation among group
members.
Storming
During this stage, group members begin to learn to accept each other, conduct discussions and
openly make decisions. Sooner or later, members will gain confidence to participate in group
related activities.
Intra-group conflicts will also occur at this point of time as a result of members beginning to
express their individuality by exercising leadership. As group rules become more established,
members begin to discover their respective role/s within the group.
Conflict ends when the group structure solidifies via the consensual appointment of a leader and
with each member understanding his/her respective role, responsibility and authority. This stage
will witness interdependence within members of the group.
Norming
At the norming level, all conflicts and disagreements are resolved, relationships develop and
members of the group demonstrate cohesiveness. There will be cooperation among members in
order to get the best results.
Cohesiveness develops because the goals, expectations and rules of the group are now clear.
Managers should encourage groups to maintain good working relations, as the setting of norms
and values is instrumental to the success of a group.
Performing
At this stage, all issues pertaining to the structure of the group are settled. The group now
functions as one unit. The group will now focus on the task at hand. The group is now productive
as each member goes about his/her set task.
Adjourning
Finally, the group gets to the adjourning stage. This is especially so for groups established for
specific purposes or with pre-determined and limited tasks, i.e. special committees or project
teams.
Dissolution or adjournment takes place after the pre-determined tasks have been accomplished
and the goals are achieved. Here members are once again free to pursue their own work.
Whilst not all groups necessarily undergo the stages mentioned, an understanding of these stages
will assist managers to form effective and productive groups. In addition, managers should note
that there are differences between new and mature groups with the challenge being in setting
productive targets for mature groups.
Storming
-
Group members may challenge their leaders authority, or jockey for position as their
roles are clarified.
Group members may resist taking on tasks.
Norming
-
As new tasks come up, the group may lapse back into behavior from the storming stage.
Performing
Adjourning
-
Group members who like routine, or who have developed close working relationships
with colleagues, may find this stage difficult, particularly if their future looks uncertain.
An interesting discovery made in these studies was that despite the fact that several of
these groups spent as little as an hour on their projects while others took six months, each
group experienced its transition at the same point in its calendar, which is precisely half
way between its first meeting and its official deadline. This transition makes the group
appear to have a midlife crisis. This midpoint appears to work like an alarm clock,
heightening members awareness that their time is limited and that they need to get
moving.
(d) A Transition Initiates Major Changes
This transition ends Phase 1 and is characterised by concentrated changes via the
dropping of old patterns and adoption of new perspectives. The transition sets a revised
direction for Phase 2.
(e) A Second Phase of Inertia Follows the Transition
Phase 2 is a new equilibrium or period of inertia. In this phase, the group executes the
plans created during the transition period.
f) The Groups Last Meeting is Characterised by Accelerated Activity
The final meeting is the last activity in accomplishing the task.
Topic 7
1) What is the difference between a manager and leader? Examples?
Leaders are people who can conceive ideas, ensuring the continuity of their organisation and meeting all
its goals. A leader strives to influence the people under him/her to accept and implement the ideas that
he/she produces.
A manager, in view of his/her authoritative position within an organisation, instructs subordinates to carry
out tasks in order to meet organizational goals.
Examples:
-
A manager ensures that things are done right. A leader ensures that the right things are being
done.
A manager magnifies corporate policies, processes and procedures. A leader magnifies the
person, their capabilities and their purpose.
A manager administrates. A leader envisions.
A manager maintains. A leader develops.
2) Types of leaders?
Transactional Leadership
Transactional leaders are task and relationship oriented, resulting in their ability to influence
employees to do as they (the leaders) wish in an effort to achieve organisational goals. Another
feature of this leadership is the exchange process or the use of reward and punishment to ensure
members follow orders. In this context, legitimate power, reward and coercion powers become
necessary attributes for this type of leaders. It has been said that transactional leadership only
works with followers who have a clear understanding of the organisational structure and are
currently performing specific daily and routine tasks.
Charismatic Leadership
A leader is considered charismatic if he has qualities that enable him/her to establish
exceptionally good relations with his/her followers.
Charismatic attributes refer to:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Leaders who are prepared to take personal interest for the benefit of their
followers and organisations.
Transformational Leadership
It has already been mentioned that transactional leaders are only effective in an organisation that
operates under average conditions (not complex) and are stable (as opposed to dynamic).
For complex and dynamic organisations, transformational leadership is more appropriate. What is
transformational leadership? While all the charismatic attributes embodied above are also
available in transformational leadership, leaders belonging in this category have a more extensive
intent and ambitions as compared to charismatic leaders. Transformational leaders are able to
inspire followers to transcend their own self-interests for the good of the organisation. This
results in followers being prepared to put in the extra effort to achieve organisational goals.
Transformational leaders are also able to encourage their followers to generate ideas to handle old
problems with novel approaches. In addition, according to Avolio and Bass as cited by Robbins
(2008), transformational leaders desire more than what is expected by the charismatic leader. The
transformational leader expects his/her followers to be able to question any views, including those
of the leader.
It is now clear that while transactional leaders are suitable for matters relating to the daily
management of an organisation, transformational leaders are needed to manage complex, unstable
and uncertain environment/s. However, both types are needed to ensure the smooth running and
stability of an organisation.
Moral Leadership
Leadership is not merely a set of practices with no association of right or wrong. All leadership
practices can be used for good or bad and thus have a moral dimension. According to Zaufderer
(1992), leaders choose whether to act from selfishness and greed to diminish others or in ways
that serve and motivate others to develop their full potential as employees and as human beings.
Moral leadership is about distinguishing right from wrong and doing right, seeking the just, the
honest, the good and the right conduct in practice. In this context, leaders have great influence
over others, and moral leadership gives life to others and enhances the lives of others. According
to Daft (2008), immoral leadership takes away from others in order to enhance oneself.
Servant Leadership
Much of the thinking about leadership today implies that moral leadership encourages change
toward turning followers into leaders, thereby developing theory potential rather than using a
leadership position to control people. According to Daft (2008), the ultimate expression of this
leadership approach is called servant leadership. This kind of leadership can be described by
comparing the category of leaders to other leaders.
There have been a few studies specifically on behaviour and its relationship to leadership. Among them
are:
The Ohio State Studies (OSU)
Studies conducted at The Ohio State University divided the behaviours of a leader into two
dimensions: consideration and initiating structure.
In order to understand these two dimensions you need to re-look the two forms of behaviour:
consideration and work relations. Consideration is a behaviour that has to do with being
considerate. This study identified the behaviours of certain leaders and how the said behaviours
affect the relationship between leader and subordinates. These include maintaining a two-way
communication, showing appreciation for the ideas that were put forward by the employees, not
being prejudiced whilst taking an interest in employee welfare and having empathy towards them.
What about the initiating structure dimension? This initiating structure, which shares the same
characteristics with Task Relationships, is job oriented. In this instance, a leader tries to structure
and provide detail explanation about the job and the role played by employees in accomplishing
their respective tasks to ensure that organisational goals are met.
Based on Figure 7.5, two dimensions are represented in this grid: concern for employees (people)
and concern for production. These are placed along two axes with each axis being made up of
nine positions, beginning from 1 to 9, which is the highest point. In total, there are 81 positions
representing the various leadership styles practiced by leaders.
For instance, a leader who is at position (1,9) is extremely concerned about his/her employees
welfare at the expense of their respective tasks. A leader who falls into position (9,1) overly
emphasises the task and rates very low pertaining to his/her concern for employees. Leaders who
are at (1,1) are neither concerned with tasks nor employees whilst a leader who is at (9,9) places
equal emphasis on employees and tasks. What about leaders who are at (5,5)? They place a
balanced and moderate emphasis on tasks and employees.
Topic 8
1) Why communicate? (Functions of Communication)
Communication acts to control the behaviours of members in several ways and organisations have
authority hierarchies and formal guidelines that employees are required to follow. For instance,
communication performs its control functions when employees are required to report (communicate) any
task related problems to their immediate boss, instructed to adhere to their job descriptions and comply to
company policies.
Communication fosters motivation by clarifying to employees what needs to be done, how well they
(employees) are performing on their job and what employees should do to improve performance.
Communication performs its motivational function in the processes of formulation of specific goals,
provision of feedback on employees progress towards goals, and reinforcement of desired behaviour
amongst employees.
In its function as a tool for emotional expression, many employees regard their work group as a primary
source of social interaction. This is in view of the fact that the communication which takes place within
the group is a fundamental mechanism by which members express their frustrations and feelings of
satisfaction. In this instance, communication provides a release for emotional expression of feelings and
fulfilment of social needs.
The final function of communication is related to its role in facilitating decision making by providing
information required by individuals and groups in order for them to make decisions. The data is used to
identify and evaluate alternatives in the decision-making process.
All the mentioned four functions of communication are equally important. For instance, organisations are
able to perform effectively when they are successful in maintaining some form of control over its
members, provide motivation for members to perform in a good way, provide a channel for members to
express themselves emotionally and allowing members to make decisions.
However, lateral communication is not without its problems. Firstly, it could lead to conflict
between the lower and upper management when the former fails to adhere to proper procedures
pertaining to issues that occur beyond the knowledge of the latter.
Topic 9
1) Importance of Organisational Culture? (Functions)
Organisational culture is a system of actions, values and beliefs that are developed in an organisation and
shared by all members of the organisation.
Function
Defining Boundaries
Providing Identity
Generating
Commitment
Serves as a Control
Mechanism that
Guides Employees
Behaviour and Attitude
Explanation
An organisational culture differentiates one organisation from another. This
is due to the fact that each organisation has its own culture that is practised
by its members.
Culture also provides members of an organisation with an identity that they
can call their own. For example, a culture that encourages employees to
come up with something new will promote creativity and innovation, in
addition to making employees feel that they stand apart from employees of
other organisations because of the values that they hold.
Organisational culture that consists of specific values can increase
commitment among members. For instance, when an organisation makes
employee welfare an important agenda, this will lead to the provision of
various benefits like medical insurance, scholarship and housing.
The stability of an organisations social system is reflected in the degree to
which the work environment is considered positive and conducive for
optimum performance in addition to how well conflicts and changes are
handled. This is due to the fact that organisational culture provides a
standard for the kinds of permissible actions that can be implemented whilst
handling all sorts of problems.
Social stability can result in a positive working environment, in which
problems and conflicts are amicably overcome.
Culture can influence an employees behaviour and attitude because it
determines what is acceptable and unacceptable in terms of behaviour and
actions. In addition, a strong culture would provide employees with a single
direction and/or guidelines on what to do. In fact, an employee-organisation
fit which is reflected in employee behaviour and organisational culture
compatibility, strongly influences decisions on who to employ, who is
appraised as a high performer and who is promoted.
Attention to Detail
Outcome Orientation
People Orientation
Team Orientation
Aggressiveness
Stability
Description
This refers to the extent an organisation encourages its employees to be
innovative and to take risks. Organisations that rank high on this
characteristic strongly encourage their employees to try something new, such
as making decisions by intuition, irrespective of the fact that these
organisations are uncertain of whether the intuitions will be profitable to the
company.
This refers to the degree to which employees are expected to give attention
to detail in the course of their work. Organisations characterised this way
place a lot of emphasis on details and expect their employees to conduct
detailed analysis on any decision prior to implementing those decisions.
In this characteristic, the management focuses on results rather than on the
techniques and processes. In this instance, the management believes that if
the process is good, the outcome will be equally good. However, there are
also organisations that concentrate more on the quality of their products and
services rather than on techniques and processes.
This refers to the level in which an organisation is concerned over the effect
of its decisions on its employees. A management that is people-oriented
would always obtain the participation of its employees in the decisionmaking processes.
This refers to the number of teamwork activities in an organisation. An
organisation ranks high on this characteristic if it stresses on teamwork.
This refers to the degree in which members of the organisation are
aggressive and competitive. Organisations which emphasise on
aggressiveness like to encourage their employees to compete with one
another whilst offering merit based rewards.
Organisations with this characteristic prefer to maintain its status quo whilst
trying to avoid changes. Organisations such as this would most probably find
it difficult to adapt to changes occurring around them.
Achievement Culture
Clan Culture
Bureaucratic Culture
Explanation
This culture is characterised by strategic leaders encouraging values that
support the organisations ability to interpret and translate signals from the
environment into new behavioural responses. In this context, employees
have autonomy to make decisions and act freely to meet new needs; and
responsiveness to customers is highly valued. For example, leaders
encourage experimentation and risk taking as an everyday way of life.
An achievement culture is characterised by a clear vision of the
organisations goals, and leaders focus on the achievement of specific targets
such as sales growth, profitability, or market share. This is associated with a
result oriented culture that values competitiveness, aggressiveness, personal
initiative, and the willingness to work long and hard to achieve results.
This culture has an internal focus on the involvement and participation of
employees to meet changing expectations from the external environment.
Companies with a clan culture are generally friendly to work with, and
employees may seem almost like a family. The leaders emphasis on
cooperation and consideration of both employees and customers can avoid
status differences.
The bureaucratic culture has an internal focus and consistency orientation for
a stable environment. The culture supports a rational and orderly way of
doing business. Following the rules and being thrifty are valued. The
organisation will normally succeed by being highly integrated and efficient.
Topic 10
1) Explain power principle?
Power refers to a phenomenon that enables an individual to influence or force others to follow his/her
individual wishes or requests.
There are two principles from the general definition that can be put forward:
(a) The influential individual or the one exerting influence; and
(b) The influenced individual or the person who is being influenced.
In this matter, the individual who influences (identified as A) definitely has power. Whereas individual or
individuals who are influenced (B, C, D) are those who lack or are without power, unlike A, who is with
power. If B, C and D are influenced and follow the directions or wishes that A gives, this means A has
power over them.
Organisations are created to achieve certain objectives. For that purpose, human resources need to be
combined synergistically. This will only happen if there is power that can ensure human resources are
used optimally.
Powers that are created will enable individuals (power holders) to perform tasks for the good of the
organisation, such as taking disciplinary actions, giving rewards, implementing change, making decisions
and resolving conflicts.
Based on this explanation, we can say that power brings good to the organisation. However, some people
see power from a negative perspective. In this context, power is seen as a negative force since it can
always be abused.
In organisations, power can be abused by individuals for their self-interests. This is evident in instances
such as financial mismanagement, bringing down other people whom they do not like, nepotism, or
spreading influence and power domains.
In this aspect, it can be concluded that power does not only bring good, but at the same time can also
bring misfortune to organisations. Nevertheless, power is still being needed. More importantly, the higher
management should ensure that negative power is not allowed to be a dominant force in an organisation if
they cannot eradicate it totally.
Topic 11
1) What is mandated pressure to change?
Organisations today are faced with a dynamic business environment, which forces them (organisations)
to adopt changes in their quest to have a competitive business edge.
Organisations are forced to take on activities similar to those of other organisations because of outside
demands placed on them to do so. These mandated pressures or requirements may be either formal or
informal.
Unstructured group interactions are also meant to increase employees understanding on group
process whilst highlighting the significance of improving their individual listening skills.
Employees are also encouraged to note the importance of having an open attitude, as well as
conflict resolution and tolerance skills to better manage individual differences.
Surveys Feedbacks
Feedback from surveys conducted in an organisation is another method that can be utilised to
evaluate the attitude of its members, identify differences in perception among them and narrow
the gap between these differences.
In general, survey questions usually focus on employees perception and attitude on various
topics, which include decision-making practices, the effectiveness of the organisations current
communication process, coordination among units and employees satisfaction pertaining to
work, co-workers and immediate supervisors.
The collected data will be used to identify the current problems of the organisation including
employees grievances. In addition, these data can also be utilised by the management to provide
employees with a clear feedback on other issues that are ambiguous to them. Survey results are
also tools to encourage employees to hold discussions amongst themselves with the hope that via
these discussions, employees can reach a mutual agreement and/or solution to the problems that
are highlighted through the surveys.
Process Consultations
Consultants are engaged by the organisations to provide managers with better feedback and
understanding about themselves, their surroundings and other aspects of the organisation. With
the assistance of a consultant, the manager will gain skills to diagnose management processes that
require change and identify alternative solutions to selected problems and/or misgivings.
Team Building
Team building is a method that uses group interaction activities to increase trust and openness
among members of a team. This is done via goal setting activities, interpersonal development
among team members, role analysis to clarify the responsibilities of each team member and
analysis of the team process. In addition, activities to analyse the main process of the team tasks
are also conducted. These activities would be able to identify current weaknesses whilst
highlighting improved work process techniques that would increase team effectiveness.
Inter Group Development
Inter Group Development refers to the techniques used to bring forth changes in the attitudes and
perceptions of teams towards other teams. For example, employees in the human resource
department would have a stereotypical assumption of employees in the finance department as
being overly prudent when resources are required for the purpose of human resource
development. A negative perception such as this will make coordination efforts between these
departments difficult.