Council Evidence, Rezoning - Manukau and Highbrook

BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL
IN THE MATTER
of the Resource Management Act 1991

and the Local Government (Auckland
Transitional Provisions) Act 2010
AND
IN THE MATTER
of TOPIC 081f Rezoning and Precincts

(Geographical Areas)
AND
IN THE MATTER
of the submissions and further

submissions set out in the Parties and
Issues Report
JOINT EVIDENCE REPORT ON SUBMISSIONS

BY ANNA JENNINGS, ROGER ECCLES AND DAVID WONG
SOUTH HIGHBROOK AND MANUKAU CENTRAL CITY BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY
26 JANUARY 2016
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Business Park
City Centre
Countryside Living
Future Urban
General Business
Heavy Industry
Height Sensitive Areas
Historic Character
Large Lot
Light Industry
Local Centre
Metropolitan Centre
Mixed Housing Suburban
Mixed Housing Urban
Mixed Rural
Mixed Use
National Grid Corridor
Neighbourhood Centre
Outstanding Natural Feature
Outstanding Natural Landscape
Pre-1944 Building Demolition Control
Public Open Space
Rapid and/or frequent service network
Rural and Coastal Settlement
Rural Coastal
Rural Conservation
Rural Production
Rural Urban Boundary
Significant Ecological Areas
Single House
Special Purpose
Strategic Transport Corridor
Terrace Housing and Apartment
Buildings
Town Centre
Volcanic Viewshafts
Abbreviation
BP
CC
CL
FU
GB
HI
HSA
HC
LL
LI
LC
MC
MHS
MHU
MR
MU
NGC
NC
ONF
ONL
Pre-1944 BDC
POS
RFN
RCS
RC
RCon
RP
RUB
SEA
SH
SP
STC
THAB
TC
VV
1.
SUMMARY
1.1
The purpose of this Joint Evidence Report (Report) is to consider submissions and
further submissions to the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) Topic 081
Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas) (Topic 081). This Report considers
submissions and further submissions that were received by Auckland Council (the
Council) in relation to zoning of Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and
Industry.
1.2
This evidence covers the geographical areas of Highbrook, Manukau and Puhunui.
These areas have similar zoning themes due to the large portion of land zoned Heavy
Industry and Light Industry. Highbrook is bounded by the East Tamaki River and
Manukau and Puhunui by the Manukau Harbour.
1.3
A total of 142 submission points have been received by the Council in relation to the
PAUP zoning within Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry. The
area has been divided into the following 2 sub areas:
S3 area Botany, East Tamaki, Highbrook (25 submission points)
S10 area Manukau City Centre, Rata Vine, Great South Road, Browns Road
(117 submission points)
1.4
The Report states whether or not we support the submissions, in full or in part, and
identifies what amendments, if any, should be made to address matters raised in
submissions.
1.5
In response to these submission points which either seek to amend or retain zoning,
an assessment was made against the relevant PAUP objectives and policies of the
relevant zone/s, the Regional Policy Statement (RPS), and local and regional context
to determine whether the requests are supported or rejected.
As a result of the
assessment, our position is broadly as follows:

Where:
(a)
Submissions seek retention of the zone and where this is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives and policies of the PAUP zone(s)
and gives effect to the RPS, retention is supported.
(b)
Submissions seek to rezone sites to a higher or lower residential zone,

consideration has been given to the PAUP objectives and policies of the
3
notified and sought zone(s), the RPS and local context. We support changes
to zoning where the zoning complements the local context, and/or is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives and policies of the zone, and/or
gives effect to the RPS.
(c)
Submissions seek to make changes to business zoned land, the requests are
assessed against the relevant zone objectives and policies, the RPS, the
context of the site and its surroundings and the potential economic growth and
viability of the area.
We support changes to zoning where the zoning
complements the local context, and/or is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives and policies of the zone, and/or gives effect to the RPS.
(d)
Submissions seek to rezone sites from Light Industry or Large Lot zone as a
consequence of the Councils position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui.
1.6
As a result of the rezoning analysis undertaken, we propose a number of zoning

changes. Where we have not supported changes proposed in submissions we have
outlined reasons to justify our positions.
1.7
Attachment B to this Report sets out the analysis and planners' position with regard to
the themes raised in submissions requesting relief in relation to the zoning of
Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry. Attachment C contains
the analysis and the planners' proposed position against each submission point and
proposed changes to the zoning maps.
Attachment D addresses area wide
submissions, on which we have relied in proposing a number of in scope area-wide or

street-wide changes to the notified zones.
1.8
Attachment E contains two maps for each of the geographic submission area units
within Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry: the PAUP zones
as notified but with properties identified that are subject to submissions; and the zoning
changes now proposed by the Council, with in-scope and out of scope changes
identified. Proposed changes that are within scope are shown as black outline, while
those that are out of scope are shown as blue outline. The out of scope changes
proposed are set out in Attachment F, together with the reasons for them.
PART A: OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND

2.
INTRODUCTION
2.1
The purpose of this Report is to consider submissions and further submissions that
were received by the Council in relation to zoning of Highbrook and Manukau Central
City Business and Industry (as shown in Figure 1). These areas have been grouped
together as they are predominately zoned for business or industry and have similar
zoning themes. The evidence of Mr Marc Dendale for Auckland Council Topic 081
Geographic rezoning includes a full description of the areas covered in this Report.
Figure 1: Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry
2.2
Highbrook is one of the largest industrial areas in Auckland and is located in the
Howick Local Board Area. It is bounded by Ti Rakau Drive, Ti Iriangi Drive and
intersected by Harris Road, Highbrook Drive and Springs Road. The area is relatively
flat and juts out into the Tamaki Estuary which provides a coastal edge. It has good
transport connections for trucks and goods to State Highway 1 heading north and
south. Connector bus routes run along Cryers Road and Highbrook Drive.
2.3
The centre of the area is zoned HI, surrounded by a sleeve of LI. The type of business
activity vary across the area from office/business park, warehousing, distribution to
heavy industry. Several large industrial companies have headquarters within
Highbrook.
2.4
Along the edges of the area fronting Ti Rakau Drive and Te Irirangi Drive the type of
use changes to larger scale retail and commercial including large format DIY
companies. Closer to Botany Town Centre, the zoning changes from industrial to
residential with THAB, MHS and MHU along Te Irirangi Drive and MU adjacent to the
Centre. Manukau City is the main commercial centre for southern Auckland. It is zoned
MC and serviced by two major transport routes, State Highway 1 and State Highway
20 and has a rail connection to the Auckland CBD. West and North of the Centre is a
significant area of GB zoning and to the South West Wiri provides a large are of
industrial zoned land. There are also residential areas around Rata Vine Drive, Trevor
Hoskins and Inverell Avenues to the South East of the Centre.
2.5
The Puhinui area comprises about 1,100 hectares and is located adjacent to the
South-Western Motorway to the east, and in close proximity to Auckland International
Airport to the west. It is largely zoned RP in the PAUP, and lies outside the RUB as
notified. The area includes the Manukau Memorial Gardens (Cemetery), Colin Dale
Park and Puhinui Reserve. The Council has undertaken structuring planning for the
Puhinui area, which has informed its position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui, and
to provide additional land for future urban development.
2.6
The structure planning work has confirmed that parts of the Puhinui area can be
urbanised, subject to robust and more restrictive planning provisions to recognise and
protect significant archaeological, cultural heritage, and environmental values and to
respond to development constraints associated with the operation of Auckland
International Airport and the capacity of the transport network.
2.7
Precinct provisions will apply to the live zones, which address when and how
development can occur.
6
2.8
Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry area contains seven
precincts as follows:
2.9
(a)
Waiouru
(b)
East Tamaki
(c)
Wiri 1
(d)
Wiri 2
(e)
Wiri 3
(f)
Manukau
(g)
Puhunui
We note that submission points on the precinct provisions are addressed in the
separate precinct Evidence Reports prepared by Michelle Perwick, Jeremy Wyatt,
Anna Jennings, Vrinda Moghe and Sukhdeep Singh.
2.10 This Report has been prepared Anna Jennings, Roger Eccles and David Wong. The
qualifications and experience of the Report writers are attached in Attachment A.
2.11 This Report states whether or not we support the submissions, in full or in part, and
identifies what amendments, if any, should be made to address matters raised in
submissions.
Analysis of Submissions by Planners
2.12 Submission points on sub area unit S3 (Highbrook) were addressed by Anna Jennings.
2.13 Submission points on sub area unit S10 (Manukau and Puhunui) were addressed by
Roger Eccles and David Wong.
3.
CODE OF CONDUCT
3.1
We confirm that we have read the Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses contained in
the Environment Court Practice Note 2014 and that we agree to comply with it. We
confirm that we have considered all the material facts that we are aware of that might
alter or detract from the opinions that we express, and that this Report is within our
area of expertise, except where we state that we are relying on the evidence of another
person.
4.
SCOPE
4.1
We are providing planning evidence in relation to Highbrook and Manukau Central City
Business and Industry rezoning submissions.
4.2
In preparing this Report we have relied on the Auckland-wide evidence of John Duguid
for Topic 080 Rezoning and Precincts (General) (Topic 080) and Topic 081, which
sets out the statutory framework, methodology, principles, and section 32 evaluations,
used to guide the development and application of zones and precincts.
4.3
In preparing this Report we have also relied on the statement of evidence of Marc
Dendale for Topic 081f Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas) - South, which
sets out a sub-regional overview of the South area including an area description of the
area, overview of key infrastructure and transformation projects, and a summary of the
precincts and rezoning outcomes in the South area.
4.4
The following expert statements of evidence have been relied on in preparing our
Report:
(a)
Alastair Cribbens, Steve Wrenn and Liam Winter, Public Transport (Auckland
Transport);
(b)
Mark Bourne, Water Infrastructure Planning (Watercare Services Ltd);
(c)
Anthony Reidy, Zoning of Roads;
(d)
David Mead, Flooding and Natural Hazards ;
(e)
Deborah Rowe, Historic Heritage and the Pre-1944 Overlay ;
(f)
Lisa Mein, Historic Character; and
(g)
Peter Reaburn, Volcanic Viewshafts and Height Sensitive Areas.
5.
STATUTORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK
5.1
The statutory framework is detailed in Section 5 of the evidence of Mr Duguid, dated 3

December 2015, and has not been repeated here.
5.2
Paragraph 5.12 of Mr Duguid's zoning evidence identifies the provisions of the New
Zealand Coastal Policy Statement of particular relevance to zoning, while paragraphs
5.13 to 5.21 address the provisions of the Auckland Plan. Section 6 then discusses
the key sections of the RPS, as amended by the Council's current position, which need
8
to be considered and given effect to through the application of zones (and precincts).
Again, we do not repeat Mr Duguid's evidence here. However, of particular relevance
to the planners' proposed positions relating to Highbrook and Manukau Central City
Business and Industry are the following RPS provisions discussed at paragraph 6.2 of
Mr Duguid's evidence (with specific paragraph references in brackets):
(a) B2.1 Providing for growth in a quality compact urban form Objectives 1 and 3
and Policy 2 (paragraph 6.2(a)).
(b) B2.2 A Quality Built Environment Objective 1B (paragraph 6.2(b)).
(c) B2.3 Development Capacity and Supply of land for urban development
Objective 2 (paragraph 6.2(c)).
(d) B3.1 Commercial and Industrial Growth Objective 1 (paragraph 6.2(g)).
(e) B.3.2 Significant infrastructure Objectives 5 and 6 (paragraph 6.2(h)).
(f) B3.3 Transport Objective 2 (paragraph 6.2(i)).
(g) B4.1 Historic heritage Objective 1 (paragraph 6.2(j)).
(h) B4.2 Special (Historic) character Objectives 1, 3 and 4 (paragraph 6.2(k)).
(i) B4.3.1 Natural character Objective 1 (paragraph 6.2(l)).
(j) B4.3.2 Landscape and Natural Features Objective 7 (paragraph 6.2(m)).
(k) B6.7 Natural hazards Objective 1 (paragraph 6.2(s)).
(l) B7.1 Subdivision, use and development in the coastal environment Objective
5 and Policy 2A (paragraph 6.2(t)).
6.
INTERIM GUIDANCE FROM THE PANEL
6.1
We have read the Panels Interim Guidance and in particular those relating to:
(a)
Chapter G: General Provisions, dated 9 March 2015;
(b)
Best practice approaches to re-zoning and precincts, dated 31 July 2015;
(c)
Air Quality, dated 25 September 2015; and
(d)
Chapter G General Provisions, dated 9 October 2015.
(e)
6.2
Chapter G: Regional and District Rules, dated 9 October 2015.
The Panels Interim Guidance on best practice approaches to re-zoning and precincts
sets out best practice approaches to changing zoning and precincts and Air Quality. I
support the Panels guidance.
7.
APPROACH TO ZONING WITHIN THE PAUP
7.1
As noted above, the Councils zoning principles are set out in Mr Duguids evidence
about zoning for Topics 80 and 81 dated 3 December 2015. The Councils approach
to zoning is also detailed in Mr Duguids evidence in paragraphs 5.3-5.11. We have
read and agree with this evidence.
Section 32 and 32AA
7.2
Section 32AA of the RMA requires a further evaluation for any changes that are
proposed to the notified zones since the original Auckland Unitary Plan Evaluation
Report (the Evaluation Report) was completed under section 32.
All of the
amendments to the notified PAUP zonings proposed in our evidence have been
assessed in accordance with section 32AA. Although not explicitly stated, the options
that we have considered in our assessment include the notified zoning, the amended
zoning as sought by submitters, and the zone we have proposed in each case. The
outcome of our section 32AA analysis is reflected in the reasons stated in (as relevant)
Attachments B, C and F.
7.3
The zoning issues to which this Report relates are not specifically discussed in the
Evaluation Report, however they reflect any recent decisions of the Environment Court,
if relevant, and have been the subject of a section 32 process.
Auckland Transport / Watercare / Stormwater Unit input
7.4
Watercare Services Limited (WSL), Auckland Transport (AT), and the Council's
Stormwater Unit (SWU) have provided technical input on rezoning. There was also
consultation on HC and Pre-1944 BDC matters and VVs / HSAs as required.
7.5
In particular, WSL has provided input on the known transmission capacity constraints
and planned investment of infrastructure in respect of their network. This information
was provided on the basis of WSLs understanding of capacity as at November 2015.
7.6
AT has provided input on planned infrastructure investment in line with the new public
transport network to be implemented from 2016, as well as more specific comments on
10
particular areas where other transport investment is planned. These infrastructure

factors have informed Councils consideration on appropriate zonings in Highbrook and
Manukau Central City Business and Industry area, with the view to reach alignment
between land-use and infrastructure provision.
7.7
SWU has also provided relevant input where there are flooding constraints on
properties. For instance, as noted in Attachment D to David Mead's evidence of Topic
080 on flooding and natural hazards, in some cases SWU has assessed a particular
site as being "in an area where flood plain hazards are considered to be inaccurate
and/or not significant". That advice, alongside the other factors / principles also listed
in Mr Meads Attachment D, has influenced our assessment of the appropriate zoning
of properties affected by a flood plain.
PART B: OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS

8.
SUBMISSION THEMES
8.1
A total of 140 submission points have been received by the Council in relation to the
PAUP zoning within Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry. The
area has been divided into the following 2 sub areas:
S3 area Botany, East Tamaki, Highbrook (25 submission points)
S10 area Manukau City Centre, Rata Vine, Great South Road, Browns Roa
and Puhunui (117 submission points)
8.2
Of the 140 submission points received, the following themes have been identified
across the Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry. Within these
themes submissions seek to retain or rezone, details of which are set out in the
analysis in Attachment B:
Any residential properties subject to a key overlay 31 submission points.
THAB isolated or new areas 16 submission points
Spot zoning 15 submission points.
Heavy Industry Zone (HIZ) and Light Industry Zone (LIZ) 12 submission
points
Rural Urban Boundary (RUB) and rezoning 10 submission points.
11
Centres/Terrace Housing Apartment Buildings (THAB)/Mixed Use

Expansion/Contraction 8 submission points.
Combined rezoning and precinct submission 6 submission points.
Special Purpose 5 submission points
Mixed Housing Urban/Mixed Housing Suburban/Single House

Expansion/Contraction 4 submission points.
Business to other business zone (excludes mixed use and centres zones) 3
submission points.
8.3
Centres Hierarchy 3 submission points.
Residential to other use 1 submission points.
Public open space 1 submission point.
The Auckland Council submission (no. 5716-2986) seeks to rezone 1 property within
S10 to correct a mapping error.
8.4
Full analysis of the changes requested by these submission points is included in

Attachment C to this Report. Maps showing proposed zoning changes are included in
Attachment E.
PART C: ANALYSIS
9.
ANALYSIS OF SUBMISSIONS
Attachment B
9.1
Attachment B contains an analysis and planners' position with regard to the themes
raised in submissions requesting relief in relation to the zoning of Highbrook and
Manukau Central City Business and Industry.
9.2
In undertaking this analysis we have had regard to the expert statements of evidence
listed at paragraph 4.4 above.
Attachment C
9.3
Attachment C contains an analysis and position on individual submission points. On

occasion, we have proposed the application of a new zone which differs from both the
12
notified zone and the zone proposed by a submitter, and which is not within the scope
of the submission. In those circumstances, we have recorded in the "reasons" column
in Attachment C that the proposed rezoning is regarded as 'out of scope' (in which
case further detail is provided in Attachment F and out of scope changes have been
identified on zoning maps in Attachment E)
Relevant Overlays, Precincts and Constraints.
9.4
The table in Attachment C has 16 columns for each submission point. The purpose of
each column is generally self-explanatory. However we wish to explain briefly the
content in the column entitled Relevant Overlays, Precincts and Constraints (the
constraints column), and clarify the relationship between the content of the
constraints column and the Reasons column:
(a)
Properties are often subject to a number of overlays and constraints.
(b)
As the word relevant in the heading of the constraints column suggests, we

have not always listed all overlays / constraints in the constraints
column. Instead, we have only listed those constraints that we consider may
have an impact on the zoning of the relevant property.
(c)
Consistent with (b) above, the use of N/A in the constraints column does not
necessarily mean that there are no overlays or constraints affecting a
property. In some instances we have reached the view that any overlays or
constraints are not directly relevant to the determination of the appropriate
zoning and have used the abbreviation N/A in those circumstances.
(d)
Moving to the Reasons column, it should be noted that we do not

necessarily discuss every one of the constraints listed in the constraints
column. Rather, we have generally focused our discussion on the key or
principal constraint(s) relevant to determining the appropriate zoning for a
given property.
Attachment D
9.5
Attachment D addresses area wide submissions, on which we have relied in

proposing a number of in scope area-wide or street-wide changes to the notified
zones.
13
Attachment E
9.6
Attachment E contains two maps for the Highbrook and Manukau Central City
Business and Industry area:
(a)
The PAUP zones as notified, but with properties identified that are subject to
submissions; and
(b)
The zoning changes proposed by the Council, with both in scope and out of
scope changes identified. Proposed changes that are in scope are shown as
black outline, while those that are out of scope are shown in blue outline.
9.7
Having regard to the requirements of sections 32 and 32AA of the RMA and the other
statutory criteria of the RMA outlined in the evidence of Mr Duguid and the matters
raised by submitters, we consider that the proposed zoning changes are appropriate
because:
(a)
The proposed amendments to the zones meet, and are the most appropriate
way to achieve, the relevant PAUP objectives and policies of the Residential
and Business zones.
(b)
The proposed amendments give effect to the RPS provisions of the PAUP.
(c)
The proposed amendments which are outside the scope of submissions are a
holistic and comprehensive approach, which enables Council to give effect to
the RPS, achieve the zone objectives and policies and which is in accordance
with best planning practice.
(d)
The proposed zoning of land is aligned with the provision of infrastructure; in

particular transport, wastewater, water and stormwater management and
planned investment of these infrastructure networks for the growth potential of
Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry area.
(e)
The proposed zoning of land takes into consideration the Councils approach
in determining the most appropriate zone, where the area/site is subject to the
pre-1944 and historic (special) character and SEA overlays.
(f)
The Councils position is to partially shift the RUB at Puhunui. Structure Plan
work has been undertaken. Light Industry and Large Lot zoning of the area is
considered most appropriate to achieve the objectives of these zones and
14
10.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF SUBMISSIONS
10.1 As outlined in Mr Duguids evidence, a number of amendments are proposed which

are outside the scope of the submissions in order to give effect to the proposed PAUP
RPS and to achieve the objectives (and policies) of the zones as proposed to be
amended in the Councils closing statements to the Panel on Topics 051-054
(Business) and Topics 059, 060, 062, and 063 (Residential). The out of scope changes
proposed are set out in Attachment F, together with the reasons for them.
10.2 Out of scope changes proposed by the Council are, as noted, shown as blue outline on
the zoning changes proposed by the Council map for each sub area in Attachment E.
10.3 Additionally, we have proposed a number of amendments to zoning(s) to correct minor
technical errors. There are no particular submissions to which these amendments
respond, and therefore they are technically also out of scope.
11.
CONCLUSIONS
11.1 We have considered the submissions received on the zoning of Highbrook and
Manukau Central City Business and Industry area and we consider that the zoning
changes proposed by the Council, as set out in the maps included within Attachment
E, most appropriately meet the statutory framework for zoning set out in the statement
of evidence of John Duguid about zoning for Topics 080 and 081, and the purpose of
the Act.
Anna Jennings, Roger Eccles and David Wong

26 January 2016
15
ATTACHMENT A: CVs of Report Writers

Career Summary David Wong
Career Period
Role
Organisation
2010 to present
Principal Planner
Auckland Council
2000 to 2010
Senior Planner
Auckland Council
1991 to 2000
Planner
Manukau City Council
Qualifications
Bachelor of Planning, University of Auckland, 1992.
Bachelor of Arts, University of Auckland, 1989.
Affiliations
Full member of the New Zealand Planning Institute.
Career Summary
I have over twenty years experience working in the former Manukau City Council, the former
Auckland City Council, and Auckland Council on designations, plan changes, and spatial
plans. For the last two years I have been Lead Planner for the Otara-Papatoetoe Area Plan,
and contributed to the development of the rural urban boundary at Puhinui in the PAUP.
Roger Eccles
Career Summary
Duration
Organisation
Role
November 2010 -
Auckland Council
Planner, Planning South
March 2008 October

2010
North Shore City Council
Planner
Jan 2006 Nov 2007
Transport, Auckland City

Council
Policy Planner
16
Qualifications
Bachelor of Planning, University of Auckland, 1991
Bachelor of Arts, University of Auckland
ANNA JENNINGS
EDUCATION AND AFFLIATIONS
Member of the New Zealand Planning Institute
Full Membership of NZPI granted in February 2011
Master of Planning (Honours), University of Auckland
July 2004 July 2005
Bachelor of Planning (Honours, Senior Scholar), University of Auckland
July 1999 July 2003
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
Principal Planner, Planning South, Auckland Council
Auckland, April 2013 to present
Regional Stormwater Policy Advisor, Melbourne Water
Melbourne, Australia September 2011 to December 2012
Planning Consultant, Hill Young Cooper
Auckland, New Zealand, March 2010 to May 2011
Major Projects Officer/Technical Specialist, Environment Agency
London, United Kingdom June 2006 to July 2009
Planning Consultant, Meridian Planning Consultants Ltd
Auckland, December 2004 to December 2005
Policy Advisor, Ministry for the Environment
Wellington, February 2004 to July 2004
17
AFFLIATIONS AND CONFERENCES

Stormwater Industry Association 2012 Victoria Excellence Awards
Merit award for Excellence in Research, innovation, policy and education
Healthy Cities Conference Geelong, June 2012
Presentation titled Improving Liveability through the Implementation of WSUD
Stormwater Conference 2012 Melbourne, October 2012
Presentation and paper titled Building capacity with regional and rural councils Water
Sensitive Urban Design and Integrated Water Management
18
ATTACHMENT B: ANALYSIS OF SUBMISSIONS BY THEME

S3 HIGHBROOK, EAST TAMAKI, BOTANY
THEME
OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS
PLANNERS POSITION
Centres/Terrace Housing and

Apartment Buildings/Mixed Use
Expansion/Contraction
Two submissions seek to rezone an area from THAB to

MU (on Ti Rakau Drive).
One submission seeks to retain the MU zone on Ti

Rakau and Te Irirangi Drive.
Position: Submissions seeking to rezone an area of THAB on Ti Rakau Drive to MU are not
supported. The site is already partly occupied by residential units, the site is on a RFN and
close to Botany MC. Immediately to the east of the sites is an area of THAB. Retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
One submission seeks to rezone all properties with

access from Bishop Lenihan Place from LI to MU.
Position: Support the retention of MU zone for land directly adjacent to Botany Centre.
Retention of the MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
This is already an established area of MU and retaining the zone gives effect to the RPS.
These sites are adjacent to and compliment the Botany MC and on Ti Rakau Drive, an RFN
that will be served in the future by a rapid busway being delivered by AMETI. Retention of the
MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS
Position: Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropriate zone is LI. Te
Irirangi Drive in this location creates a buffer between the developing residential areas to the
east (Flat Bush) and industrial land to the west. The current use on the site which includes live
work units is protected by existing use rights. Residential activities in this location have the
potential to create reverse sensitivity issues. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Business to other Business zone

(excludes Mixed Use and Centres
zones)
Four submissions relate to rezoning properties adjacent

to Te Irirangi Drive from LI to GB.
Position: Do not support submission points requesting a zone change from LI to GB.
Maintaining the site as LI zone reduces the potential of creating reverse sensitivity on adjacent
industrial sites and Te Irirangi Drive provides separation to the residential areas to the east.
Any new areas of GB are subject to a number of criteria, set out in Policy 7 and 8 of B3.1 of
the RPS, which includes distributional effects on centres, transport, effects on quality compact
urban form, and industrial land. These sites do not meet the criteria. Retention of the LI zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Combined rezoning and new

precinct request
Four submissions relate to rezoning sites from LIto MU

in line with a new precinct request, East Tamaki.
Position: Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropriate zone is LI. Te
Irirangi Drive in this location creates a buffer between the developing residential areas to the
east (Flat Bush) and industrial land to the west. The current use on the site which includes live
work units is protected by existing use rights. Residential activities in this location have the
potential to create reverse sensitivity issues. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. The new precinct
request for East Tamaki is not supported; refer to evidence of Michelle Perwick for Auckland
Council.
Heavy Industry Zone (HIZ) and

Light Industry Zone (LIZ)
Nine submissions seek to retain the HI or LI zone as

notified in the PAUP.
One submission seeks to rezone 90 Cryers Road from
Position: All submissions to retain the HI zoning as notified are supported. Retention of the HI
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Highbrook is one of the largest areas of industrial zoned land in Auckland and it is
important to retain current zoning that allows for continued use of the land for these activities.
19
THEME
Special purpose
PLANNERS POSITION
HI to LI.
Position: Do not support change of zone from HI to LI. Refer to evidence of Mr Roger Eccles
for Auckland Council Topic 051-054. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes
place in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and South Auckland in
particular. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the HI zone and give effect to the RPS.
One submission seeks to rezone 28 and 32 Bishop

Dunn Place to Special Purpose Places of Worship.
Position: Do not support change from LI to SP - Places of Worship. Council's position on the
SP - Places of Worship zone is to remove it from the PAUP. Refer to evidence of Trevor
Mackie Topic 055. No change is recommended and the notified zone of LI should be retained.
Existing use rights will allow the activities on site to continue. Retention of the LI zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS
S10 MANUKAU AND PUHUNUI

THEME
PLANNERS POSITION
Mixed Housing Urban/Mixed

Housing Suburban/Single House
Three submission points to retain MHS zoning.
One area-wide submission for SH zoning in areas

subject to potential reserve sensitivity constraints related
to HI zoning.
Position: Support three submission-points seeking retention of MHS zoning. These properties
are a significant distance from the RFN and are not close to the Manukau Metropolitan Centre.
This area is mainly of suburban dwellings. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Position: Support one submission point for retention of SH zoning where practicable to limit
reverse sensitivity constraints and loss of amenity in relation to HI zoning. The SH zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
Centres/Terrace Housing
Apartment Buildings
(THAB)/Mixed Use
Any residential properties subject

to a key overlay including
flooding
Six submission points seek to retain the zoning. Two

relate to a NC at Burnside Road, three relate to retention
of the MC zoning for Manukau and one relates to the
MU zoning at 736 Great South Rd.
One submission point seeks to rezone 286 Puhunui Rd

from NC to LI.
31 submission points seek rezoning of properties from

SH, and MHS to MHU or THAB. Two of these
submission points seek rezoning from MHS to MHU
and THAB in the area immediately south of SouthWestern Motorway and between Druces Road and
Position: All six submission points that seek retention of the NC, MC or MU zoning are
supported. Three relate to the MC zoning for Manukau, the zoning of which is in line with the
centres hierarchy strategy in the RPS. Retention of the relevant NC, MC or MU zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the relevant zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Position: Change of zone from NC to LI at 286 Puhunui Rd is not supported. The site is a
suitable location for a NC. There is a range of local retail businesses at the location. There is
also residential development in the area. Retention of the NC zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone, recognise local context and gives effect to the RPS.
Position: Support rezoning of 22 Pantera Way from a SH to MHS zone as managing the
flooding risk on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.
Position: Do not support 28 requests for rezoning from SH or MHS to MHS, MHU or THAB.
The submission points may be declined on the basis of flooding constraints, reverse sensitivity
20
THEME
PLANNERS POSITION
Great South Road
THAB isolated or new areas
16 submission points seek to rezone properties from SH

or MHS to THAB.
constraints related to the High Aircraft Noise Areas (HANA) or HI air quality. Rezonings in
relation to reverse sensitivity constraints were opposed this include HANA and air quality. The
proposed rezoning in Brown Street, Manurewa was opposed because of reverse sensitivity
constraints. Also considered was the distance to TC or THAB zoning and the distance to the
RFN. Retention of the SH or MHS zonings is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
Position: Two submission points seeking to rezone an area from SH and MHS to MH, MHU
and THAB are supported in part. This includes provision of MHU in Great South Road,
Manukau and THAB in Barrowcliffe Place, Manukau. Some parts of this area are subject to
flood constraints or are remote from the Manukau Metropolitan Centre or from the RFN. Some
sites are proposed to be rezoned where managing flood risks does not require maintaining the
SH zone. The mix of residential zonings provided is considered the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zones and gives effect to the RPS.
Position: 12 submission points were partially supported for rezoning from MHS to MHU. The
area is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent to the RFN .THAB is not
supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC zone. Rezoning to MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Position: Four submission points seeking to rezone from MHS to THAB were not supported
because of the distance from MC, TC and MU zonings and the RFN. Retention of the MHS
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Spot zoning
15 submission points seek to rezone from SH,MHS or LI

to MHU,THAB and LI
Position: One submission-point supported in part. Submitter requested LI to GB, however, it

is considered that MU zoning better reflects the existing use of the site and potential for
redevelopment next to the AUT campus. The MU zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Position: One submission-point supported at 3 Great South Rd to rezone from MHS to MHU.
The site is in close proximity to the RFN and rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to
Position: 13 submission-points were not supported as they create a spot zone and were
remote from a TC, MC or THAB zoning or the RFN. A spot zone in these locations will not
generally achieve the integrated management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the current SH or MHS zonings is considered the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
21
THEME
PLANNERS POSITION
Public Open Space
One submission point seeks to provide for parking at

boat jetties.
Position: Most ramps and jetties are in POS zones that allow for car parking areas or
reserve area that provided for supporting activities. Retention of the POS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Business to other Business Zone

(excludes mixed use and centres
zones)
Two submission points seek rezoning of properties at 2

Ryan Place from LI to GB and 277 Browns Road,
Manurewa from GB to LC.
One submission to retain GB zoning at 652 Great South

Rd.
Position: The two rezoning submission points are not supported. At 2 Ryan Place, retention
of the LI zone is supported. The RPS seeks the retention of LI zoning where practicable.
Rezoning at 277 Browns Rd is not supported. The GB to LC was not supported The GB
zoning is close to the Wiri HI zoning. To locate a LC zone would provide a zoning that would
be problematic in managing reverse sensitivity effects.
Position: Support the retention of the GB zoning at 652 Great South Road as the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the GPS.
Centres Hierarchy
Combined rezoning and precinct

submissions
Two submission points seek to rezone the Manukau MC

to a Super MC and surrounding GB and LI to MU.
One submission seeks to rezone an area of GB adjacent
to Manukau MC to MC zone.
One submission points seeks to retain the NC zone at 4
Noel Burnside Road in Wiri.
Two submission points seek to rezone land surrounding

the Manukau MC from GB to MC or MU.
One submission seeks to rezone 10 Pacific Events

Centre Drive and 834 Great South Road from MU to LI.
Two submissions seek to retain the MC zoning for

Manukau and one submission seeks to retain the GB
zoning for 55 Lambie Drive.
Position: Do not support two submissions seeking expanding MC zoning of the Manukau
Metropolitan Centre. The submissions seek to create a Manukau Metropolitan "Super' Centre
zone. Retention of the MC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the centres hierarchy strategy in the RPS.
Position: Do not support submission rezoning from GB to MC. The property falls within High
Aircraft Noise Area (HANA) overlay areas and is adjacent HI zoned area. Retention of the
GB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Position: Support retention of current NC zone. Retention of the NC zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone. This NC zoning at Noel Burnside
Road, Wiri can has a role and function for the surrounding Papatoetoe residential area and
gives effect to the centres strategy/hierarchy of the RPS.
Position: Do not support two submission-points to rezone GB zones to MU and /or MC.
These properties within the HANA, as such there are reverse sensitivity constraints.
Retention of the GB and MU zones is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and give effect to the RPS including the centres strategy/hierarchy.
Position: Do not support rezoning from MU to possible alternative business zone. The site is
in close proximity to a MU zone, Manukau MC and the RTN. While there is no direct
equivalent of Business 5 in the PAUP; the MU zone is the closest. The Auckland Council
District Plan (Manukau Section) Business 5 zone is a mixed used zone for industry, offices
and a limited range of retailing activity. Retention of the MU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Position Support the current MC zoning of the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. Retention of
the current MC zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the MC zone objectives and
gives effect to the centres strategy /hierarchy of the RPS.
Position: Support retention of GB zoning at 55 Lambie Drive. GB zoning in response to

HANA aircraft noise controls. Retention of the GB zone is the most appropriate way to
22
THEME
PLANNERS POSITION
Residential to other use
One submission point seeks to rezone land in the

Puhunui Road and Cavendish Drive area and the Burrell
Avenue area from SH to LI.
Position: Rezoning from SH to LI is not supported. Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone, recognise local context and gives
effect to the RPS.
Special Purpose
One submission points seek to retain Special Purpose

Major Recreation Facility zoning for 770R Great South
Road, Manukau
Two submission points seek to rezone land on Marble
Place, Manurewa from MHS to SP.
Two submission points seek to rezone land on Lambie
Drive and Druces Road, Manurewa from MHS and LI to
POS/SP.
Position: Support retention of SP-Major Recreation Facility zone for Pacific Events Cultural
Centre. This is the appropriate zoning for the Pacific Events Cultural Centre. Retention of the
SP - Major Recreation Facility zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Position: Do not support rezoning of land on Marble Place from MHS to SP. The land is in
private ownership and no agreement with the owner has been reached. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Position: Do not support rezoning of land on Lambie Drive and Druces Road from MHS to LI
and POS/SP. There is no land owner agreement for the change. Retention of the MHS zone
Position: Two submission points seeking to rezone from LI to HI zones were supported. This
related to the area immediately south of the Wiri Oil Terminal and west of Roscommon Road
Wiri. This large area of land was formal zoned Quarry Zone under the Auckland Council
District Plan (Manukau Section). The former Quarry zone operated under similar controls as
HI zoning and as a consequence it is less likely that reverse sensitivity issues will arise. This
provides an opportunity to extend the existing HI zoning with the former quarry area. Rezoning
to HI is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the HI zone and gives effect to
the RPS. (This position is consistent with the Council's Topic 051-054 evidence.). Part of this
area is the site of the Wiri Prison and the Youth Justice facility.
Position: Do not support rezoning from LI to HI at 195 Browns Road. Proposed HI zone
directly opposite Browns Road MHS. The LI provides a higher threshold for air quality
measures and better protects the amenity of residential areas. Retention of the LI zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning to provide for a range of activities
and gives effect to the RPS.
Position: Four submission points seeking to rezone from LI to HI were not supported.
Rezoning to LI would result in the loss of scarce heavy industrial land. The HI zone and the
associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of
employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area. Importantly, retaining the HI
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning to provide for a
range of activities and gives effect to the RPS. This include Plunket Avenue HI zoning with
provides for larger HI zoned block and a better protection against possible reverse sensitivity
effects that could arise. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Heavy Industry Zone (HIZ) and

Light Industry Zone (LIZ)
Three submission points seeks to rezone properties

from LI to HI including on the boundary of the Wiri Oil
Terminal boundary and at 195 Browns Road.
Four submission points seek to rezone properties from

HI to LI at 100 Plunket Avenue, 8 Diversey Lane and
around Kerrs Road.
Five submission points to seek to retain HI or LI zoning.
23
THEME
PLANNERS POSITION
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the Topic
051-054 evidence.)
Rural Urban Boundary (RUB) and

rezoning
Position: Support 5 submission points for the retention of LI and HI zones. RPS addresses
need to retain HI zoning within Auckland where possible. The HI zone and the associated
manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in
Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area.
Four submissions seek to rezone the block of land

bounded by State Highway 20 to the east, State
Highway 20B/Puhinui Road to the north, Prices Road to
the west, and Puhinui Stream to the south from Rural
Production to General Business zone. The Southern
Gateway Consortium constituting a number of individual
companies are the majority owners of this block of land.
Position: The request to rezone this block of land (i.e. the Southern Gateway Consortiums
land) from RP to GB is not supported as it will not give effect to B3.1 of the RPS. The Council
has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Councils
position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. LI zoning of this land is consistent with the
Councils position to rezone all the land South of Waokauri Creek (including the consortiums
land) to LI, and is compatible with the LI and HI zoning respectively of the nearby Noel
Burnside/Diversity Lane area, and Mclaughlins Road. Rezoning of LI is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the LI zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Two submissions seek to rezone 286 Portage Road,

Mangere from Rural Production to Mixed Housing
Suburban zone.
Two submissions seek to rezone Puhinui Peninsula from

Rural Production to Future Urban zone.
One submission seeks to provide residential and

business growth in Drury, Alfriston, Karaka, Flat Bush
and Puhinui. Reject development in Paerata.
One submission seeks to retain the Rural Production

zone in the Puhinui area on land either side of Puhinui
Road, east of the South-western Motorway and east of
the airport.
Position: Do not support the rezoning of 286 Portage Road, Mangere from RP to MHS. The
land is outside the RUB and is subject to the ONF overlay for Crater Hill, and has significant
cultural heritage and landscape value to Mana Whenua. Retention of the RP zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the RP zone and gives effect to the RPS,
including B8.2 by maintaining the sites capability, flexibility and accessibility for primary
production.
Position: Do not support the rezoning of Puhinui Peninsula from RP to FU zone. The Council
has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Councils
position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rezoning the land from RP to LI and LL, subject
to precinct provisions to manage the effects of future development on the cultural landscape
values of Puhinui, and to ensure that staged development of the land is co-ordinated with the
provision of infrastructure; is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the two
zones and gives effect to the RPS.
Position: The request to provide residential and business growth is supported in the Puhinui
Peninsula. The Council has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has
informed the Councils position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rezoning the land from
RP to LI and LL zoning (to provide for future business and residential development and
growth) is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the two zones and gives
effect to the RPS.
Position: Do not support the retention of the Rural Production zone. The Council has
undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Councils position
to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rural zoning is not appropriate within the RUB.
Rezoning the land to LI and LL, subject to precinct provisions to manage the effects of future
development on the cultural landscape values of Puhinui, and to ensure that staged
development of the land is co-ordinated with the provision of infrastructure; is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI and LL zones and gives effect to the RPS.
24
ATTACHMENT C: Zoning Analysis and Position for each Submission Point
HIGHBROOK AND MANUKAU

Attachment 'C': Zoning Analysis and Position for each Submission Point
Notes: The black text in the "summary" column of this Attachment is as notified. Occasional amendments have been made in red to take account of any re-notified SDR points and also for clarity, where necessary.
Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel
Submission Point Pathway Report
SUB
57162986
SUBMITTER
NAME
TOPIC
Auckland Council Highbrook
(Attn: Stephen
and
Manukau
Town)
City Central
Business
839-5039 Housing New

Zealand
Corporation
Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation
Zealand
Corporation
Zealand
Corporation
Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation
Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Auckland Council Evidence

Analysis
SUB
PROPERTIES
AREA
SUBJECT TO
UNIT
SUMMARY
SUBMISSION
S10
Rezone 22 Pantera Way,
22 Pantera Way,
Manukau Central (LOT 2 DP
Manukau Central
206110) from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban. Refer
to submission, Volume 4, page
14/35 and Attachment 712,
Volume 20.
S10
Rezone 226, PUHINUI ROAD,
226, PUHINUI ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Single House to Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing Urban.
Planner's Position
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
PLANNER'S
REQUESTED PRECINCTS AND
PROPOSED
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
POSITION
MHS
Flooding
SUPPORT IN FULL;
Constraints
CHANGE OF ZONE
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
Any residential
Manukau
properties subject to a
key overlay
PAUP ZONE
SH
Any residential
key overlay
Papatoetoe
SH
MHU
S10
Rezone 8, ATKINSON AVENUE, 8, ATKINSON

Any residential
Papatoetoe from Single House to AVENUE, Papatoetoe properties subject to a
Mixed Housing Suburban.
key overlay
Papatoetoe
SH
MHS
S10
Rezone 2, ISLAY PLACE, Wiri

2, ISLAY PLACE,
from Single House to Terrace
Manukau
Housing and Apartment Buildings.
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
SH
S10
Rezone 148, PUHINUI ROAD,

48, PUHINUI ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Single House to Papatoetoe
Any residential
key overlay
Papatoetoe
S10
Rezone 2, INVERELL AVENUE,

Wiri from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 28, INVERELL AVENUE,
2, INVERELL
AVENUE, Wiri
Any residential
key overlay
28, INVERELL
AVENUE, Wiri
S10
REASONS
Support rezoning from a SH to MHS zone. Managing the flooding risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character
and the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
CHANGE
CHANGE
MHS
Yes
CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENT
No
High Aircraft Noise DO NOT SUPPORT

Area/flooding
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
High Aircraft Noise DO NOT SUPPORT
Area/Flooding/Sen CHANGE; SUPPORT
sitive Area
RETENTION OF
Restriction
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. This property is within the High Aircraft Noise Area
No change
(HANA) and as such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. The SH zone also complements the
neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
(HANA). The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. To manage future
reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the SH zone.The SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No
No
No
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
No
No
MHS
Flooding
Constraints
No change
No
No
Manukau
MHS
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
No change
No
No
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
MHS
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The SH site and nearby properties are affected by
flooding constraints. The site is also remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and a significant
distance from the RFN. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. The site and nearby properties are affected by flooding
constraints. The site is also remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre. The SH zone complements
the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The site is also remote from Manukau Metropolitian
Centre and a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning MHS to THAB. The property is remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre
and the Great South Road Mixed Use zone. It is also a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS
zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
No change
SH
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No
Rezone 29, INVERELL AVENUE, 29, INVERELL

Wiri from Single House to Terrace AVENUE, Wir
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
SH
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
No
Rezone 32, INVERELL AVENUE, 32, INVERELL

AVENUE, Wiri
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
MHS
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and nearby properties are affected by flooding No change
constraints. The site is also remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre. The SH zone complements
the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Property is distant from Manukau Metropolitian Centre No change
and Great South Road Mixed Use zone. It is also a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS
zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No
S10
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No
No
S10
Rezone 41, CLENDON AVENUE, 41, CLENDON

Papatoetoe from Single House to AVENUE, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing Suburban.
Any residential
key overlay
Papatoetoe
SH
MHS
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
(HANA). The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. To manage future
reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the SH zone. The SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No
S10
Rezone
38,20,48,22,46,32,44,42,36,40,34
,52,50, TREVOR HOSKEN
DRIVE,2, DRUCES ROAD, Wiri
from Single House to Terrace
38,20,48,22,46,32,44,4 Any residential

2,36,40,34,52,50,
TREVOR HOSKEN
key overlay
DRIVE,2, DRUCES
ROAD, Wiri
Manukau
SH
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and nearby properties have flooding constraints. No change
Property is distant from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and more than 500 metres from good RFN
and the proposed Manukau public transport hub. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No
S10

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 11,13,1,3,5,7,9,
TOURMALIN PLACE,1A,3,
TREVOR HOSKEN
DRIVE,24,26,12,14,22,16,
DRUCES ROAD, Wiri from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Terrace
11,13,1,3,5,7,9,
Any residential
TOURMALIN
PLACE,1A,3, TREVOR key overlay
HOSKEN
DRIVE,24,26,12,14,22,
16, DRUCES ROAD,
Wiri
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from Manukau Metropolitian No change
Centre, more than 500 metres from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub. The
MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
No
No

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 21, TREVOR HOSKEN

DRIVE,10,5,7,8, ZIRCON PLACE,
Rezone 10,8,6, GRANITE
PLACE,11,1,3,5,7,9, MARBLE
PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing
Rezone 54,52, INVERELL
AVENUE, Wiri from Mixed
21, TREVOR
HOSKEN
DRIVE,10,5,7,8,
ZIRCON PLACE, Wiri
Wiri
MHS
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No
10,8,6, GRANITE
Any residential
PLACE,11,1,3,5,7,9,
MARBLE PLACE, Wiri key overlay
Manukau
MHS
THAB
No change
No
No
54,52, INVERELL
AVENUE, Wiri
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
MHS
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No
Rezone 1,9,7, ISLAY

PLACE,39,45,43,41, INVERELL
AVENUE, Wiri from Single House
to Terrace Housing and
Rezone 46,44,42,48, INVERELL
AVENUE, Wiri from Mixed
1,9,7, ISLAY
PLACE,39,45,43,41,
INVERELL AVENUE,
Wiri
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
SH
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No
46,44,42,48,
INVERELL AVENUE,
Wiri
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from Manukau
Metropolitian Centre, more than 500 metres from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public
transport hub. The MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone
Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from the Manukau
Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from the Manukau
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and nearby properties are affected by flooding
constraints. The properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre and more 500 metres
from the RFN route. The SH zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The properties are also remote from the Manukau
Metropolitian Centre and more than 500 metres from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public
transport hub. The MHS zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
No
No

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation
S10
S10
S10
S10
Any residential
key overlay
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Page 1

SUBMITTER
SUB
NAME
Zealand
Corporation
TOPIC
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business

Zealand
Corporation
839-7107
839-7108
839-7644
839-7955
839-8005
5277-243
1607-1
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Housing New
Highbrook
Zealand
and
Manukau
Corporation
City Central
Business
Housing New
Highbrook
Zealand
and
Corporation
Manukau
City Central
Business
Housing New
Highbrook
Zealand
and
Manukau
Corporation
City Central
Business
Housing New
Highbrook
Zealand
and
Corporation
Manukau
City Central
Housing New
Highbrook
Zealand
and
Corporation
Manukau
City Central
The Urban Design Highbrook
Forum New
and
Zealand (Attn:
Manukau
Graeme Scott)
City Central
Business
Mila Cheung
SUB
AREA
UNIT
SUMMARY
S10
Rezone 753,749,751,747, GREAT
SOUTH
ROAD,12A,12B,14,10B,10C,10A,
ISLAY PLACE, Papatoetoe from
Single House to Terrace Housing
and Apartment Buildings.
S10
Rezone 18, ILIAD PLACE,26,
INVERELL AVENUE,10,4, IXIA
S10
Rezone 10,12,14, INVERELL
AVENUE,5, ILIAD PLACE, Wiri
from Mixed Housing Suburban to
Buildings.
S10
Rezone 10,8,12,14,16, ILIAD
PAUP ZONE
SH
18, ILIAD PLACE,26,

INVERELL
AVENUE,10,4, IXIA
PLACE, Wiri
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The properties are also remote from the Manukau
No change
Metropolitian Centre and more than 500 metres from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public
transport hub. The MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS
No
No
10,12,14, INVERELL
AVENUE,5, ILIAD
PLACE, Wiri
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from the Manukau
Metropolitian Centre and a significant distance from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public
No change
No
No
10,8,12,14,16, ILIAD
PLACE, Wiri
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The properties are remote from the Manukau
No change
Metropolitian Centre and a significant distance from the RFN and the proposed Manukau public
No
No
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are remote from the Manukau
Metropolitian Centre and a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS suburban zone is separated
by a POS zone from a new THAB area. The MHS zone complements the suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH toTHAB. The SH site and nearby properties are affected by
flooding constraints. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri
HI zone. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects it is proposed that the area be retained as a SH
zone. The site and nearby properties also are affected by flooding constraints. The SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning inpart from MHS to MHU and THAB. This includes THAB for land adjacent to
Barrowcliffe Place, rezoning of 761 - 783 Great South Road to MHU and rezoning parts of Kerrs
Road to MHU. Other parts of this area are subject to flood constraints or are distant from the
Manukau Metropolitan Centre or from the RFN. Some sites are proposed to be zoned for higher
density where managing flood risks does not require maintaining the SH zone. This mix of residential
zonings is considered the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri
zone. The site and near properties are also affected vby flooding constraints. The SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH and LI to MHS. The area in question is also in close proximity to the
Wiri HI zone. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects it is proposed that the area be retained as
a SH zone. The SH and LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH and
LI zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
No
No
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
MHS
MHU
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
S10
Rezone 118 PUHINUI ROAD.

18 PUHINUI ROAD
Papatoetoe from Single House to
Any residential
key overlay
Papatoetoe
SH
MHU
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
S10
Rezone 36A PLUNKET AVENUE.

Puhinui-Manukau City Centre
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.
Rezoneland surrounding
Manukau Metropolitan Centre, as
shown in the submission [refer to
page 50/104]from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban and Terrace Housing and
Rezone 192 Puhinui Road,
Mixed House Suburban
36A PLUNKET
AVENUE
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
SH
MHS
N/A
Manukau Metropolitan Any residential

Centre
key overlay
Manukau
SH/MHS
MHU/THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
192 Puhinui Road,

Papatoetoe
Any residential
key overlay
Papatoetoe
SH
MHS
N/A
Rezone land on Browns Road,

Manurewa as shown in the
submission [refer to page 41/104]
from Single House and Light
industry to Mixed Housing
suburban.
page 50/104]from Mixed Housing
Urban and Terrace Housing and
Rezone land on Browns Road,
Manurewa as shown in the
from Single House and Light
industry to Mixed Housing
suburban.
Rezoneland on Puhinui Road and
Plunket Avenue, Manukauas
page 50/104]from Single House
to Mixed Housing Suburban.
Rezoneland on Puhinui Road and
Plunket Avenue, Manukauas
page 50/104]from Single House
Retain the Mixed Use zone on Ti
Rakau Drive and Te Irirangi Drive.
Browns Road,
Manurewa
Any residential
key overlay
Wiri
SH/LI
MHS
N/A
Manukau Metropolitan Any residential

Centre
key overlay
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
Browns Road,
Manurewa
Any residential
key overlay
Wiri
SH/LI
MHS
N/A
Puhinui Road and

Plunket Avenue,
Manukau
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
SH
MHS
Puhinui Road and

Plunket Avenue,
Manukau
Any residential
key overlay
Manukau
SH
451, 490, 475, 500 Ti

Rakau Drive and 550
Te Irirangi Drive and 5
Te Koha Road, East
Tamaki
Centres/Terrace
Botany
Housing Apartment
Buildings (THAB)/Mixed
Use
Residential to other use Manukau
S10
5280-245 The New Zealand

Institute of
Architects (Attn:
Graeme Scott)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
5277-223 The Urban Design

Forum New
Zealand (Attn:
Graeme Scott)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
5277-242 The Urban Design Highbrook
Forum New
and
Zealand (Attn:
Manukau
Graeme Scott)
City Central
Business
2575-67 AMP Capital
Highbrook
Property Portfolio and
Limited et al (Attn: Manukau
David Haines)
City Central
Business
S10
5294-349 Auckland
InterNotioNol
Airport Limited
S10
S10
S10
S3
Rezone land in the Puhinui Road Puhinui Road

andCavendishDrive area,
andCavendishDrive
Manukau, and the Burrell Avenue area, Manukau,
area, Papatoetoe, shown on the
plan attached to the submission
as Map 4 from 'Single House' to
'Light Industrial'. Refer to details
in submission at page 166/218.
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
REASONS
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and nearby properties are affected by
flooding constraints. The properties are remote Manukau Metropolitian Centre and more 500 metres
from the RFN route. The SH zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
CHANGE
CHANGE
No change
No
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
Any residential
Papatoetoe
key overlay
Rezone 20 DRUCES ROAD. Wiri 20 DRUCES ROAD

S10
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
753,749,751,747,
GREAT SOUTH
ROAD,12A,12B,14,10
B,10C,10A, ISLAY
PLACE, Papatoetoe
Planner's Position
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
PLANNER'S
PROPOSED
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
POSITION
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
S10
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
5280-225 The New Zealand Highbrook
and
Institute of
Manukau
Architects (Attn:
City Central
Graeme Scott)
Business

Institute of
Architects (Attn:
Graeme Scott)

Analysis
No
MHS, THAB Yes

and MHU
no
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Support rezoning inpart from MHS to MHU and THAB. This includes THAB for land adjacent to
MHS, THAB Yes
Barrowcliffe Place, rezoning of 761 - 783 Great South Road to MHU and rezoning parts of Kerrs
and MHU
Road to MHU. Other parts of this area are subject to flood constraints or are distant from the
Manukau Metropolitan Centre or from the RFN. Some sites are proposed to be zoned for higher
density where managing flood risks does not require maintaining the SH zone. This mix of residential
zonings is considered the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH and LI to MHS. The area in question is also in close proximity to the No change
No
Wiri HI zone. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects it is proposed that the area be retained as
a SH zone. The SH and LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH and
LI zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri No change
No
No
MHS
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri No change
No
No
MU
MU
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No
No
SH
LI
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Support retention of MU zone on Ti Rakau and Te Irirangi Drive. Retention of the MU zone is the
No change
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone. This is already an established area of
mixed use and retaining the zone gives effect to the RPS. These sites are adjacent to and
compliment the Botany MC and on Ti Rakau Drive, an RFN that will be served in the future by a rapid
busway being delivered by AMETI. The MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MU zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to LI zone. This part of Puhinui Road is residential in Nature and
No change
this stretch of Puhinui Road remains an important part of residential Papatoetoe. This is the same for
the Burrell Avenue area. The SH zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
No
No
Page 2
No

SUB
1386-1
SUBMITTER
NAME
TOPIC
Body Corporate
Highbrook
211277 (Attn: Neil and
Manukau
E Black)
City Central
Business
SUB
AREA
UNIT
SUMMARY
S3
Rezone 302 Te Irirangi Drive,
Flatbush from Light Industrial to
Mixed Use.

Analysis
PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
302 Te Irirangi Drive,
Flatbush
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
Combined rezoning and East Tamaki
new precinct request
PAUP ZONE
LI
Planner's Position
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
PLANNER'S
PROPOSED
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
POSITION
MU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
CHANGE
CHANGE
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
Do not support change of zone from LI to GB zone. Current activities on the site can operate under
No change
existing use rights. Any new areas of GB are subject to a number of criteria, set out in Policy 7 and 8
of B3.1 of the RPS which includes distributional effects on centres, transport, effects on quality
compact urban form, industrial land and reverse sensitivity. This site is in close proximity to Botany
Junction and the developing Flat Bush town centre to the east. Rezoning to GB will not give effect to
the centres strategy/hierachy in the RPS.
Support the retention of the LI zone. The site is suitable for LI, located on a main arterial route, and No change
surrounded by land zoned LI. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives on the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No
No
No
REASONS
Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropriate zone is LI. Te Irirangi Drive in
this location creates a buffer between the developing residential areas to the east (Flat Bush) and
industrial land to the west. The current use on the site which includes live work units is protected by
existing use rights. Residential activities in this location have the potential to create reverse
sensitivity issues. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to acheive the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropropriate zone is LI. Te Irirangi Drive in
Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropropriate zone is LI. Te Irirangi Drive in
Support the retention of LI. The site is adjacent to the industrial area of East Tamaki and on a main
arterial road. It is established as a Bunnings Warehouse which the Council proposes to be permitted
within the zone. Refer to evidence of Jeremy Wyatt for Auckland Council, Topics 051-054. Retention
of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives and policies of the zone and
Do not support change of zone from LI to MU. The most appropriate zone is LI. Te Irirangi Drive in
sensitivity issues. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
The submitter is requesting GB and cites the presence of large format DIY retail stores which are not
possible in LI zone. The Council proposes that trade suppliers such as Bunnings and Mitre 10 are
permitted in the LI zone. Refer to evidence of Jeremy Wyatt for Auckland Council, Topics 051-054.
industrial sites and Te Irirangi Drive provides separation to the residential areas to the east. Any new
areas of GB are subject to a number of criteria, set out in Policy 7 and 8 of B3.1 of the RPS, which
includes distributional effects on centres, transport, effects on quality compact urban form, and
industrial land. The site does not meet the criteria. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate
The submitter is requesting GB and cites the presence of large format DIY retail stores which are not
possible in LI zone. The Council proposes that trade suppliers such as Bunnings and Mitre 10 are
permitted in the LI zone. Refer to evidence of Jeremy Wyatt for Auckland Council, Topics 051-054.
industrial sites and Te Irirangi Drive provides separation to the residential areas to the east. Any new
areas of GB are subject to a number of criteria, set out in Policy 7 and 8 of B3.1 of the RPS, which
includes distributional effects on centres, transport, effects on quality compact urban form, and
industrial land. The site does not meet the criteria. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate
Do not support change of zone from LI to MU zone. While the site is located on an main arterial road
(Te Irirangi Drive), this road creatres a buffer between the residential development areas to the east
and the surrounding industrial land. The current use on the site which includes live work units is
protected by existing use rights. Sufficient residential growth is being planned and developed around
Botany Junction and within Flat Bush. Further residential development in this location has the
potential to create reverse sensitivity issues in this location. Retention of the LI zone is the most
approporiate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
1425-1
Body Corporate
344027 (Attn: Te
Irirangi Lofts)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S3
Reject light industrial Zoning for

Unit 13, 15 Bishop
Unit 13, 15 Bishop Lenihan Place, Lenihan Place, Botany new precinct request
Botany South, Manukau. Zoning South
should allow mixed use.
LI
MU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
2405-2
Broadway
Property Group
(Attn: Daniel L
Shaw)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S3
Rezone 308 Te Irirangi Drive, Flat 308 Te Irirangi Drive,

Bush from Light Industry to Mixed Flat Bush
Use.

LI
MU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
6096-75
Bunnings Limited Highbrook

(Attn: Bronwyn
and
Manukau
Carruthers)
City Central
Business
Colin Koh
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S3
Retain the Light Industry Zoning

at 320 Ti Rakau Drive, Botany.
320 Ti Rakau Drive,

Botany.
Heavy Industry Zone

East Tamaki
(HIZ) and Light Industry
Zone (LIZ)
LI
LI
Sensitive Area
SUPPORT IN FULL;
Restrictions, Sites RETENTION OF
and places of value NOTIFIED ZONE
to Mana Whenua
S3
Rezone 15 Bishop Lenihan Place, 15 Bishop Lenihan

East Tamaki from Light Industrial Place, East Tamaki
to Mixed Use.

LI
MU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
3091-1
Firmount Trust
(Attn: Philip
Ainsworth)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S3
Rezone 79 Ormiston Road, East

Tamaki from Light Industry to
General Business zone.
79 Ormiston Road,
East Tamaki
Business to other
Business Zone
(excludes mixed use
and centres zones)
East Tamaki
LI
GB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
3091-2
Firmount Trust
(Attn: Philip
Ainsworth)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S3
Rezone the western part of the

79 Ormiston Road,
property at 79 Ormiston Road,
East Tamaki
East Tamaki from Light Industry to
General Business zone, as shown
on Plan B attached to the
submission.
Business to other
Business Zone
(excludes mixed use
and centres zones)
East Tamaki
LI
GB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
1424-1
Gordon and Kaye

Porteous Family
Trust (Attn:
Gordon J C
Porteous)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S3

Unit 13, 15 Bishop
Botany South, Manukau. Zoning
LI
MU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
5676-1
Home Base
Botany Limited
(Attn: Iain
McManus)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S3
East Tamaki
LI
GB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
4274-108 Minister of Police Highbrook

(Attn: Justine
and
Bray)
Manukau
City Central
1427-1
S and G Gutry
Highbrook
Family Trust
and
(Attn: Steve
Manukau
Gutry)
City Central
Business
S3
Rezone 'The Bishop's Estate' - 16

Bishop Dunn Place, 1 and 5
Bishop Browne Place and 2
Bishop Croke Place, Flat Bush
from Light Industry to General
Business.
Retain the Light Industry Zoning
of 50 Ormiston Road, Flat Bush
50 Ormiston Road, Flat Heavy Industry Zone

East Tamaki
Bush
Zone (LIZ)
LI
LI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
S3

Unit 13, 15 Bishop
Botany South, Manukau. Zoning
LI
MU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support change of zone from LI to MU zone. While the site is located on an main arterial road No change
(Te Irirangi Drive), this road creatres a buffer between the residential development areas to the east
No
No

Institute of
Architects (Attn:
Graeme Scott)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S3
5256-119 The Roman

Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
Auckland (Attn:
Iain McManus)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S3
Rezoneland on Ti Rakau
Drive,east Tamakias shown in
the submission [refer to page
28/104] from Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings to Mixed
Use.
Rezone the Bishop's Estate at 28
& 32 Bishop Dunn Place, East
Tamaki (excluding the Korean
Parish land) to General Business.
1398-1
16 Bishop Dunn Place,

1 and 5 Bishop Browne
Place and 2 Bishop
Croke Place, Flat Bush
Business to other
Business Zone
(excludes mixed use
and centres zones)
53, 51A, 51, 49, 47C,

47B, 47A, 47V
Huntington Drive,
Botany
Centres/Terrace
Botany
Housing Apartment
Use
THAB
MU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support change of zone from THAB to MU. The site is already partly occupied by residential
No change
units, the sites is on a RFN and close to Botany MC. Immediately to the east of the sites is an area of
THAB. Retention of the THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
No
No
28 & 32 Bishop Dunn

Place, East Tamaki
Business to other
Business Zone
(excludes mixed use
and centres zones)
LI
GB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support change of zone from LI to GB zone. Current activities on the site can operate under
No change
existing use rights. Any new areas of GB are subject to a number of criteria, set out in Policy 7 and 8
of B3.1 of the RPS which includes distributional effects on centres, transport, effects on quality
compact urban form, industrial land and reverse sensitivity. This site is in close proximity to Botany
Junction and the developing Flat Bush town centre to the east. Rezoning to GB will not give effect to
the centres strategy/hierachy in the RPS.
No
No
East Tamaki
Page 3

SUBMITTER
SUB
NAME
Forum New
Zealand (Attn:
Graeme Scott)
TOPIC
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
53, 51A, 51, 49, 47C,
47B, 47A, 47V
Huntington Drive,
Botany
Bishop Lenihan Place, Centres/Terrace

East Tamaki
East Tamaki
Housing Apartment
Use
LI
MU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Rezone 2 Ryan Pl (also known as

607 Great South Rd), 5 Ryan Pl,
and surrounding properties (to a
depth of one lot), at Manukau
Central, from Light Industry to
General Business
Rezone the Manukau Supa
Centa, Manukau from General
Business to Metropolitan Centre
[specific sites identified in the map
in the submission refer page
10/48]. 72 and 100 Cavendish
Drive, 51 Lambie Drive, 55
Lambie Drive, 61 Lambie Drive
Rezone Manukau Metropolitan
centre and surrounds as identified
in the submission [page
78/80][refer points numbered 1,2
and 5 for new zones proposed].
Retain the General Business
Zoning at 55 Lambie Drive,
Manukau.
2 Ryan Pl, 5 Ryan Pl, Business to Other

Manukau
Business Zone
(excludes mixed use
and centres zones)
Manukau
LI
GB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
72 and 100 Cavendish Centres Hierarchy

Drive, 51 Lambie
Drive, 55 Lambie
Drive, 61 Lambie Drive
Manukau
GB
MC
N/A
Manukau Metropolitan Centres Hierarchy

centre
Manukau
MC/MHS/MU
M (Super
Centre)C / MU
55 Lambie Drive,
Manukau.
Combined rezoning and Manukau

precinct submissions
GB
S10
Rezone majority of Self land

(Puhinui) to be Mixed Housing
Suburban [specific site not
specified]. This site is specific,
referring to all land owned by Mr
Self.
286 Portage Road,

Mangere

(RUB) and rezoning
S10
Retain Mixed Housing Suburban

at 11,25,13,15,21,17,23,19,7,9,
PANTERA WAY, Manurewa.
S10
Udy Investments
Limited
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
123-1
A M Finnigan and
Ellis Gould Tinos
Trustee Limited
(Attn: J G
Goodyer)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
5883-1
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
Limited et al (Attn:
David Haines)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
1606-4
Benjamin Ross
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
(Attn: Bronwyn
and
Carruthers)
Manukau
City Central
David Tam
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
3821-2

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation
Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Planner's Position
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
PLANNER'S
PROPOSED
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
POSITION
MU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
SUB
AREA
UNIT
SUMMARY
S3
Rezone land on Ti Rakau Drive,
east Tamaki as shown in the
from Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings to Mixed
Use.
S3
Rezone all properties that have
access from Bishop Lenihan
Place, East Tamaki from Light
Industrial to Mixed Use.
2955-1
6096-78

Analysis
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
Centres/Terrace
Botany
Housing Apartment
Use
PAUP ZONE
THAB
REASONS
Do not support change of zone from THAB to MU. The site is already occupied by residential units,
the sites i on a RFN and close to Botany MC. Immediately to the east of the sites is an area of THAB.
Retention of the THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
CHANGE
CHANGE
No change
No
No
Do not support change of zone from LI to MU zone. While the site is located on an main arterial road No change
(Te Irirangi Drive), this road creates a buffer between the residential development areas to the East
Do not support rezoning of LI to GB. The RPS seeks to retain LI zoned land as a priority where
No change
possible. The GB zoning allows for a broader range of activity including retail and simlar functions.
The RPS seeks to provide for sufficient LI zoned land while limiting zoning available for retail, etc
outside the commerical centres. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the LI zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No
No
No
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from GB to MC. The property falls within High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA)
overlay areas and is adjacent HI zoned area. The MC zoning would allow for signficant residential
development and potential reverse sensitivity issues. Retention of the current GB zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the centres strategy/hierarchy in
the RPS.
No change
No
No
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support expanding MC zoning of the Manukau Metroplitian Centre. The submitter seeks to
No change
create a Manukau Metropolitan "Super' Centre zone. Retention of the current MC zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the centres strategy/hierarchy in
the RPS.
No
No
GB
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Support retention of GB zoning. The GB zone at 55 Lambie Drive provides an appropriate transtion No change
between the Manukau Metropolitan Centre and the LI and HI zoning to the west. Retention of the GB
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the GB zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No
RP
MHS
Precincts:
Mana Whenua
Management
Mangere Puhinui
Infrastructure
Overlays:
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Aircraft Noise
Notification Area
(57 dBA)
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Moderate Aircraft
Noise Area
Notural Heritage
Overlay:
Outstanding
Notural Features,
ID 22, Crater Hill
Historic Heritage
Overlay:
Sites and Places
of Value to Mana
Whenua
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support the rezoning of 286 Portage Road, Mangere from RP to MHS. The land is outside the No change
RUB and is subject to the ONF overlay for Crater Hill, and has significant cultural heritage and
landscape value to Mana Whenua. Retention of the RP zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the RP zone and gives effect to the RPS, including B8.2 by maintaining the site's
capability, flexibility and accessibility for primary production.
No
No
11,25,13,15,21,17,23,1 Mixed Housing

Manukau
9,7,9, PANTERA WAY, Urban/Mixed Housing
Manurewa.
Suburban/Single House
MHS
MHS
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No

at 3,5, PANTERA WAY,
Manurewa.
3,5, PANTERA WAY,

Manurewa.
Mixed Housing
Manukau
Urban/Mixed Housing
MHS
MHS
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No
S10

at 8,4,6, PANTERA WAY,
Manurewa.
8,4,6, PANTERA
WAY, Manurewa.
Mixed Housing
Manukau
Urban/Mixed Housing
MHS
MHS
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No
S10
Retain Neighbourhood Centre at 4 4 NOEL BURNSIDE

NOEL BURNSIDE ROAD. Wiri.
ROAD. Wiri.
Centres Hierarchy
Manukau
NC
NC
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No
S10

ROAD. Wiri.
Centres/Terrace
Manukau
Housing Apartment
Use
NC
NC
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Support the retention of the MHS zoning for these sites. These properties are a significant distance
from the RFN and are not close to the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. This area is mainly of
suburban dwellings. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
from the RFN and are not close to the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. This area is mainly of
from the RFN and are not close to the Manukau Metropoliian Centre. This area is mainly of
Support retention of current NC zone. This NC zoning at Noel Burnside Road, Wiri can has a role
and function for the surrounding Papatoetoe residential area and the Wiri industrial area. Retention
of the NC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the centres strategy and hierarchy in the RPS.
Support the retention of the NC zoning for this site. The NC zone provides for a variety of local
shops that service both residential and industrial areas.These properties are a significant distance
from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre. The NC zone complements the neighbourhood's built
character and retention of the NC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
No change
No
No
S10
Puhinui
Page 4

SUBMITTER
SUB
NAME
Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation
TOPIC
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business

Analysis
SUB
PROPERTIES
AREA
SUBJECT TO
UNIT
SUMMARY
SUBMISSION
S10
ROAD. Wiri.
S10
Rezone 4, ZIRCON PLACE, Wiri

Buildings.
4, ZIRCON PLACE
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
Centres/Terrace
Manukau
Housing Apartment
Use
Spot zoning
Manukau
PAUP ZONE
NC
Planner's Position
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
PLANNER'S
PROPOSED
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
POSITION
NC
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
MHS
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
CHANGE
CHANGE
No change
No
REASONS
Support the retention of the NC zoning for this site. The NC zone provides for a variety of local
shops that service both residential and industrial areas.These properties are a significant distance
from the Manukau Metropolitian Centre. The NC zone complements the neighbourhood's built
character and retention of the NC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change from MHS to THAB zoning. This property is remote from the Manukau
No change
Metropolitian Centre and significant distance from the RFN . In addition spot zoning in this location
will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context.
The MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB zoning. This property is remote from the Manukau
No change
Metropolitian Centre and asignificant distance from the RFN. In addition spot zoning in this location
will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context.
The MHS zone also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is close to the MU zone on Great South
MHU
Road and adjacent to the RFN. THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau
MC zone and the area does not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 14, CELADON PLACE,

14, CELADON PLACE, Spot zoning
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
767A-767D,765ATHAB isolated or new

765C, GREAT SOUTH areas
ROAD,14A-14D,12A12F, IONo PLACE,
Papatoetoe
Manukau
MHS
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 767A-767D,765A-765C,
GREAT SOUTH ROAD,14A14D,12A-12F, IONo PLACE,
Papatoetoe from Mixed Housing
Rezone 3, GREAT SOUTH
ROAD, Manurewa from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
3, GREAT SOUTH
ROAD,
Spot zoning
Manukau
MHS
MHU
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
CHANGE OF ZONE
Road and adjacent to the RFN route. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally
deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The MHU zone
S10
Rezone 8, TOPAZ PLACE, Wiri

Buildings.
8, TOPAZ PLACE,
Spot zoning
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No
No
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 5, TREVOR HOSKEN

DRIVE,2, TOURMALIN PLACE,
Rezone 13, ATKINSON AVENUE,
Mixed Housing Suburban.13,
ATKINSON AVENUE, P
5, TREVOR HOSKEN THAB isolated or new

DRIVE,2, TOURMALIN areas
PLACE,
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support change from MHS to THAB . The site is significant distance from Manukau
No change
Metropolitian Centre or TC zone. It is also a significant distance from the RFN. In addition spot
zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The MHS zone complements the suburban built character and retention of
the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB . The site is significant distance from Manukau
No change
Metropolitian Centre or TC zone. It is also a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS zone
complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No
3, ATKINSON
AVENUE, Papatoetoe
Spot zoning
Papatoetoe
SH
MHS
HANA
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No
No

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 15, COSTAR PLACE,

Urban.
15, COSTAR PLACE
Spot zoning
Manukau
MHS
MHU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No
No

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 4, CELADON PLACE,17- 4, CELADON

19, TOURMALIN PLACE, Wiri
PLACE,17-19,
from Mixed Housing Suburban to TOURMALIN PLACE,
Buildings.
Spot zoning
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support change from SH to MHS. This property falls within the High Aircraft Noise Area
No change
(HANA). The area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. As such there are
reverse sensitivity constraints. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the
SH zone. In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change in zone from MHS to MHU . The site is significant distance from the Manukau No change
Metropolitian Centre and THAB zone as well as a significant distance from the RFN. In addition spot
zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The MHS zone complements the suburban built character and retention of
the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change in zone from MHS to THAB . The site is remote from from Manukau
No change
Metropolitian Centre and a significant distance from the RFN. In addition spot zoning in this
location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The MHS zone complements the suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 12, BURRELL AVENUE,

Wiri from Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Spot zoning
Manukau
SH
MHU
HANA
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 25, FREYBERG

25, FREYBERG
AVENUE, Papatoetoe from Single AVENUE, Papatoetoe
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Spot zoning
Papatoetoe
SH
MHS
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 278,278A, PUHINUI

278,278A, PUHINUI
ROAD,6, BURRELL AVENUE,
ROAD,6, BURRELL
Papatoetoe from Single House to AVENUE, Papatoetoe
Spot zoning
Papatoetoe
SH
MHU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 8, BURRELL
AVENUE,272, PUHINUI ROAD,
Spot zoning
Papatoetoe
SH
MHU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support change in zoning from SH to MHU. The site is significant distance from the Manukau
Metropolitian Centre and is subject to the High Aircraft Noise Overlay (HANA) and as such there are
reverse sensitivity constraints. The sie is also not close to THAB. In addition spot zoning in this
context. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. This property falls within the High Aircraft Noise Area
(HANA). The area is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. As such there are reverse
sensitivity constraints. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the SH zone.
In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change from SH to MHU zoning. The site is significant distance from the Manukau
Metropolitian Centre and property falls within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA). The area is also
in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. As such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. To manage
future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the SH zone. In addition spot zoning in this
context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives
effect to the RPS.
effect to the RPS.
No change
No
No

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation
S10
12, BURRELL
AVENUE, Wiri
8, BURRELL
AVENUE,272,
PUHINUI ROAD,
Papatoetoe
Page 5
MHU

SUBMITTER
SUB
NAME
Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation
TOPIC
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
SUB
PROPERTIES
AREA
SUBJECT TO
UNIT
SUMMARY
SUBMISSION
S10
Rezone 8, BURRELL
8, BURRELL
AVENUE,272, PUHINUI ROAD,
AVENUE,272,
Papatoetoe from Single House to PUHINUI ROAD
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

Zealand
Corporation
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation

Zealand
Corporation

Analysis
S10
S10
S10
S10
Rezone 775,777,779,781,773,
GREAT SOUTH ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed Housing
Rezone
98,88,102,90,100,92,106,94,104,
96, TREVOR HOSKEN
DRIVE,55,57,51,53,49, KERRS
ROAD, Wiri from Mixed Housing
Rezone 11,10,13,12,15,14,4,6,9,
AMETHYST
PLACE,38,58,48,46,54,44,42,50,5
2,62,64, DRUCES
ROAD,77,61,73,79, KERRS
ROAD,1,3, CELADON PLACE,47,
TREVOR HOSKEN DRIVE, Wiri
from Mixed House Suburban and
Single House to Terrace Housing
and Apartment Buildings.
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
Spot zoning
Papatoetoe
PAUP ZONE
SH
Planner's Position
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
PLANNER'S
PROPOSED
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
POSITION
MHU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
775,777,779,781,773, THAB isolated or new

GREAT SOUTH
areas
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe
MHS
THAB
N/A
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
THAB isolated or new

98,88,102,90,100,92,1 areas
06,94,104,96,
TREVOR HOSKEN
DRIVE,55,57,51,53,49,
KERRS ROAD,
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
CHANGE
CHANGE
No change
No
REASONS
effect to the RPS.
MHU
Road and adjacent to the RFN .THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC
zone and the area does not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
No
Yes
No
Do not support change from MHS to THAB zoning. The sites in question are remote from the MC or No change
TC zoning and a significant distance from the RFN. Retention of the mHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No
Rezone
11,10,13,12,15,14,4,6,
9, AMETHYST
PLACE,38,58,48,46,54
,44,42,50,52,62,64,
DRUCES
ROAD,77,61,73,79,
KERRS ROAD,1,3,
CELADON PLACE,47,
TREVOR HOSKEN
DRIVE, Wiri
Rezone 1,9,5,7, RATA VINE
1,9,5,7, RATA VINE
DRIVE,11,13,11A,17,13A,3,5,7,9, DRIVE,11,13,11A,17,1
1/15,2/15, BEGONIA PLACE, Wiri 3A,3,5,7,9,1/15,2/15,
from Mixed Housing Suburban to BEGONIA PLACE,
Terrace Housing and Apartment Wiri
Buildings.
Rezone 10,8A,2,2A,6,8,4,
10,8A,2,2A,6,8,4,
BEGONIA PLACE,7A,1,3,5,7,9,
BEGONIA
ENID PLACE, Wiri from Mixed
PLACE,7A,1,3,5,7,9,
ENID PLACE, Wiri

areas
Manukau
SH
THAB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support change from MHS and SH to THAB zoning. The sites in question are remote from
No change
the MC or TC zoning and a significant distance from the RFN. The SH zoned sites are affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is appropriate Retention of the MHS and SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No

areas
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
Road and adjacent to the RFN . THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau
MC zone and does not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS
MHU
Yes
No

areas
Manukau
MHS
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS
MHU
Yes
No
Rezone 44A-44F,38,42,40, RATA 44A-44F,38,42,40,

VINE
RATA VINE
DRIVE,11,13,15,19,1,3,5E,5D,5G, DRIVE,11,13,15,19,1,3
5F,5A,5C,5B, AZALEA PLACE,
,5E,5D,5G,5F,5A,5C,5
B, AZALEA PLACE,
Suburban to Terrace Housing and Wiri
Rezone 8,2,6, LAURELIA
8,2,6, LAURELIA
PLACE,2,4B,4A, RATA VINE
PLACE,2,4B,4A, RATA
DRIVE, Wiri from Mixed Housing VINE DRIVE, Wiri
Rezone 24,10,12,20,14,22,
24,10,12,20,14,22,
LAURELIA PLACE, Wiri from
LAURELIA PLACE,
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Wiri
Buildings.
Rezone 1,3,5A,7, LAURELIA
1,3,5A,7, LAURELIA
PLACE,10,12,18,16, RATA VINE PLACE,10,12,18,16,
DRIVE, Wiri from Mixed Housing RATA VINE DRIVE,
Suburban to Terrace Housing and Wiri
Rezone 15, LAURELIA
15, LAURELIA
PLACE,24,10,12,20,14,22,16,18,8 PLACE,24,10,12,20,14
, FELICIA PLACE, Wiri from
,22,16,18,8, FELICIA
Mixed Housing Suburban to
PLACE, Wir
Buildings.
Rezone
11,25,13,27,15,21,17,2
11,25,13,27,15,21,17,23,19,39,31 3,19,39,31,37,26,35,29
,37,26,35,29,33,3,5,7,41, FELICIA ,33,3,5,7,41, FELICIA
PLACE,10,12,20,14,16,18,6,8,
PLACE,10,12,20,14,16
AZALEA PLACE,32,36,34, RATA ,18,6,8, AZALEA
VINE DRIVE,21, LAURELIA
PLACE,32,36,34,
PLACE, Wiri from Mixed Housing RATA VINE DRIVE,21,
Suburban to Terrace Housing and LAURELIA PLACE,
Wiri
Rezone 25,27,21,19,31,35,33,37A- 25,27,21,19,31,35,33,3
37E,1/29-4/29, RATA VINE
7A-37E,1/29-4/29,
DRIVE,4,1/6-6/6, ENID PLACE,
RATA VINE
DRIVE,4,1/6-6/6, ENID
Suburban to Terrace Housing and PLACE, Wiri

areas
Manukau
MHS
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
MHU
Road and adjacent to the RFN. THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC
zone and does not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Yes
No

areas
Manukau
MHS
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
MHU
Road and adjacent to the RFN . THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC
Yes
No

areas
Manukau
MHS
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
MHU
Yes
No

areas
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
MHU
Road and adjacent to the RFN .THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC
Yes
No

areas
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
MHU
Yes
No

areas
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
MHU
Road and adjacent to the RFN . THAB is not supported as the area is remote from the Manukau MC
Yes
No

areas
Manukau
MHS
THAB
Flooding
Constraints
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
MHU
Yes
No
Page 6

SUB
PROPERTIES
AREA
SUBJECT TO
UNIT
SUMMARY
SUBMISSION
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
S10
Rezone 17 RATA VINE DRIVE. 2 17 RATA VINE DRIVE. THAB isolated or new
Manukau
ENID PLACE, Wiri from Mixed
2 ENID PLACE, Wiri areas
SUBMITTER
SUB
NAME
Zealand
Corporation
TOPIC
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
839-7872 Housing New ZealaHighbrook and

Zealand
Corporation
978-2
5274-2
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
King Yu Law
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Manukau Central Highbrook
Business
and
Association
Manukau
Incorporated
City Central
(Attn: Charlotte
Business
McCort)
Minister for
Courts (Attn:
Justine Bray)
4274-107 Minister of Police
(Attn: Justine
Bray)
5723-371 Progressive
Enterprises
Limited (Attn:
AnNo
McCoNochy)
6257-31 Rockgas Limited
(Attn: Rosemary
Dixon)

Analysis
S10
S10
S10
S10
S10
4279-22
Highbrook and
S10
Highbrook and
Highbrook
S10
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
S10
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Highbrook
S10
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
4128-3
Runford
Investments
Limited (Attn:
James Hook)
3866-2
Self Trust (Attn:

Russell Bartlett)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
5064-1
Southpark
Properties Limited
(Attn: Daniel
Minhinnick)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 11 MEADOWCOURT
DRIVE, Manukau from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
11 MEADOWCOURT
DRIVE, Manukau
PAUP ZONE
MHS
Planner's Position
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
PLANNER'S
PROPOSED
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
POSITION
THAB
Flooding
SUPPORT IN PART;
Constraints
PARTIAL CHANGE
Manukau
MHS
MHU
Aircraft noise
(Mana)
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Papatoetoe
SH
MHS
Aircraft noise
DO NOT SUPPORT
(HANA)/Air Quality CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Manukau
MHS
THAB
N/A
Manukau
MC/GB//LI
MC/MU
N/A
Spot zoning
Rezone 26A BALLANCE
26A BALLANCE
AVENUE. Papatoetoe from Single AVENUE. Papatoetoe
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Spot zoning
areas
Rezone 18 Druces Road,

Manukau Central and surrounding
area to Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings
Rezone Manukau Metropolitan
Centre and surrounds from
Metropolitan Centre to Super
Metropolitan Centre zone [refer
submission point 1 for details of
this zone] and General Business
and Light Industry to Mixed Use.
Refer submission for map of
proposed changes [page 48/50].
Retain the Metropolitan Centre
Zone over the Manukau District
Court.
Retain the Metropolitan Centre
Zoning of 42 Manukau Station
Road, Manukau
Rezone the land at 277 [infer 229]
Browns Road, Manurewa [infer
from General Business] to Local
Centre or General Business.229
Browns Road
Rezone 286 Puhinui Road,
Papatoetoe from Neighbourhood
Centre to Light Industry
18 Druces Road,
Manukau Central
Rezone 10 Pacific Events Centre

Drive and 834 Great South Road,
Wiri, from Mixed Use to a zone
equivalent to Business 5 of the
operative District Plan - Manukau
Section 2002.
Rezone 'Self Trust' land [address
not given, assume it is in Puhinui]
10 Pacific Events
Centre Drive and 834
Great South Road
Rezone 622 Great South Road,

Papatoetoe to General Business
zone.
622 Great South Road, Spot zoning

Papatoetoe
Manukau Metropolitan Centres Hierarchy

Centre
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zoning. This would create spot zone within this block.
(This was the only submission within this area.) Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context. The MHS zone
complements the neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zoning. The property falls within the High Aircraft Noise
Area (HANA). The area is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. As such there are reverse
sensitivity constraints. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the SH zone.
In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change from MHS to THAB. The site is remote from Manukau Metroplitian Centre or
TC zoning. It is also a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS zone complements the
neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support expanding MC zoning of the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. The submitter seeks to
create a Manukau Metropolitan "Super' Centre zone. There are a range of constraints including
aircraft noise (HANA). The issue of a potential Manukau Super Metropolitan Centre has been
addressed previously in evidence on topic 051-054. Retention of the current zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the relevant zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
Support the current MC zoning of the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. Retention of the current MC
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the MC zone objectives and gives effect to the centres
strategy/hierarchy of the RPS.
Support the current MC zoning of the Manukau Metropolitan Centre. Retention of the current MC
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the MC zone objectives and gives effect to the centres
Do not support rezoning from GB to LC . Support the retention of the current GB zoning at 229
Brown Street. The GB zoning is next to LI zoning and close to the Wiri HI zoning. It will provide for
activities less appropriate for, or not able to locate in centres and will manage reverse sensitivity
effects. Retention of the current GB zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the GB zone
objectives and gives effect to the centres strategy /hierarchy of the RPS.
Do not support change from NC zoning to LI zoning. The site is a suitable location for neighbourhood
centre. There are a range of local retail businesses in the centre. There is also residential
development in the area. The NC zoning better reflects the existing use. The NC zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the centres
Do not support rezoning from MU to possible ALTERNATIVE business zone. The site is in close
proximity to a MU zone, Manukau MC and the RTN. While there is no direct equivalent of
Business 5 in the PAUP, the MU zone is the closest. The Auckland Council District Plan (Manukau
Section) Business 5 zone is a mixed used zone for industry, offices and a limited range of retailing
activity. The PAUP MU zone can also provide for residential development. The MU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the rezoning of 286 Portage Road, Mangere from RP to MHS. The land is outside the
RUB and is subject to the ONF overlay for Crater Hill, and has significant cultural heritage and
landscape value to Mana Whenua. Retention of the RP zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the RP zone and gives effect to the RPS, including B8.2 by maintaining the site's
capability, flexibility and accessibility for primary production.
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
Yes
No
REASONS
30 Manukau Station
Road, Manukau

MC
MC
N/A
42 Manukau Station
Road, Manukau

MC
MC
N/A
GB
GB/LC
N/A
Centres/Terrace
Papatoetoe
Housing Apartment
Use
NC
LI
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
MU
LI
Stadiums &
Showgrounds subprecinct Vodafone
Stadium
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE

(RUB) and rezoning
Puhinui
RP SP
MHS
Precincts:
Mana Whenua
Management
Mangere Puhinui
Infrastructure
Overlays:
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Aircraft Noise
Notification Area
(57 dBA)
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Moderate Aircraft
Noise Area
Notural Heritage
Overlay:
Outstanding
Notural Features,
ID 22, Crater Hill
Historic Heritage
Overlay:
Sites and Places
of Value to Mana
Whenua
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Papatoetoe
LI
GB
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
Support change from LI to MU zoning. The large is next to the RFN and close to the Manukau MC . MU
RETAIN; SUPPORT
The MU zoning provides for range of activities including business and residential. The MU zoning
ALTERNATIVE ZONE reflects current use of land which is used primarily as a caravan park that provides for medium term
accomodation. The proposed GB zone would not provide for residential use. The MU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
277 [infer 229] Browns Business to other

Road, Manurewa
Business Zone
(excludes mixed use
and centres zones)
286 Puhinui Road,
Papatoetoe
286 Portage Road,

Mangere
Manukau
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
CHANGE
CHANGE
MHU
Yes
Page 7

SUBMITTER
SUB
NAME
6386-223 Te Akitai
Waiohua Waka
Taua Trust (Attn:
Nick Roberts)
TOPIC
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
SUB
PROPERTIES
AREA
SUBJECT TO
UNIT
SUMMARY
SUBMISSION
S10
Retain the Rural Production zone Puhinui area
in the Puhinui area on land either
side of Puhinui Road, east of the
South-western Motorway and east
of the airport.

Institute of
Architects (Attn:
Graeme Scott)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

Forum New
Zealand (Attn:
Graeme Scott)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
2748-27
The Warehouse
Limited (Attn:
Paula
BrosNohan)
6851-1
Times Trust (Attn: Highbrook

S10
Deanne D'Souza) and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Toa Greening
Highbrook andS10
3371-21
Highbrook andS10
Van Den Brink

Highbrook
S10
652 Limited (Attn: and
Emma Bayly)
Manukau
City Central
2968-391 Westfield (New
Highbrook andS10
Zealand) Limited
(Attn: Francelle
Lupis)
4013-1

Institute of
Architects (Attn:
Graeme Scott)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Forum New
and
Zealand (Attn:
Manukau
Graeme Scott)
City Central
Business
S10

Institute of
Architects (Attn:
Graeme Scott)

Analysis
S10
page 50/104]from General
Business and Mixed Use to Mixed
Use and Metropolitan Centre.
page 50/104]from General
Business and Mixed Use to Mixed
Use and Metropolitan Centre.
Retain the Metropolitan Centre at
Cavendish Drive [between Lambie
Drive and Great South Road],
Manukau.
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
Rural Urban Boundary Puhinui
(RUB) and rezoning
PAUP ZONE
RP
Planner's Position
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
PLANNER'S
PROPOSED
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
POSITION
RP
Precinct:
DO NOT SUPPORT
RETAIN;
SUPPORT
Mangere Puhinui
ALTERNATIVE ZONE
Mana Whenua
Management
Infrastructure
Overlays:
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Aircraft Noise
Notification Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Moderate Aircraft
Noise Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
High Aircraft Noise
Area
Notural Heritage
Overlay:
Outstanding
Notural Features, ID
22, Crater Hill
Outstanding
Notural Features, ID
166, Pukaki Lagoon
Volcano
REASONS
Do not support the retention of the RP zone. The Council has undertaken structure planning for the
Puhinui area, which has informed the Councils position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rural
zoning is not appropriate within the RUB. Rezoning the land to LI and LL, subject to precinct
provisions to manage the effects of future development on the cultural landscape values of Puhinui,
and to ensure that staged development of the land is co-ordinated with the provision of infrastructure
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI and LL zones, and gives effect to the
RPS.
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
CHANGE
CHANGE
LI and LL
Yes
No
Manukau Metropolitan Combined rezoning and Manukau

Centre
GB/MU
MC/MU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support change in zoning from GB to MU and /or MC zoning. These properties are within
the HANA, as such there are reverse sensitivity constraints and are not suitable for residential
development. The GB and MU zones are the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zoneand give effect to the RPS including the centres strategy/hierarchy .
No change
No
No
Area Wide
GB/MU
MC/MU
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support change in zoning from GB to MU and /or MC zoning. These properties are within
the HANA, as such there are reverse sensitivity constraints and are not suitable for residential
development. The GB and MU zones are the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zoneand give effect to the RPS including the centres strategy/hierarchy .
No change
No
No
Manukau
MC
MC
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Support rentention of the MC zone. The MC zone provides for the Manukau Metropolitian Centre
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the centres
No change
No
No
Manukau
MU
MU
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Support retention of MU zone. The expansion of the MU zone under the notifified PAUP provides
support for the Manukau Metropolitan area and allows for residential development if appropriate.
The MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
No change
No
No
Manukau
MC
MC
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Support retention of MC zone for the Manukau Metropolitan area. The MC zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MC zone and gives effect to the centres strategy
/hierarchy of the RPS.
No change
No
No
Manukau
GB
GB
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Suppport retention of the GB zone. This property is within the HANA and as such there are reverse
sensitivity constraints. The GB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and give effect to the RPS including the centres strategy/hierarchy.
No change
No
No
Manukau
MC
MC
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Support retention of MC zone for the Manukau Metropolitan area. The MC zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MC zone and gives effect to the centres strategy
/hierarchy of the RPS.
No change
No
No
Manukau
MHS/LI
POS/SP
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning of LI and MHS zoned areas to POS zoning. This land for the most part is not No change
owned by Auckland Council. Part of this owned by Bethesda Residential Village, part byTransit NZ
and part by ACPL. POS is therefore not appropriate, especially in the absence of landowner
agreement. The LI, MHS and THAB zoning provide the most appropriate ways to achieve the
objectives of the relevant zones and give effect to the RPS.
No
No
Manukau
MHS
SP
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from MHS to SP zoning. The land is held as private property and the
surrounding sites are zoned MHS. The MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
No
No
Manukau
MHS/LI
POSSP
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning of LI and MHS zoned areas to POS zoning. This land for the most part is not No change
owned by Auckland Council. Part of this owned by Bethesda Residential Village, part byTransit NZ
and part by ACPL. POS is therefore not appropriate, especially in the absence of landowner
agreement. The LI, MHS and THAB zoning provide the most appropriate ways to achieve the
objectives of the relevant zones and give effect to the RPS.
No
No

Metropolitan Centre at Centres/Terrace

Cavendish Drive
Housing Apartment
Use
Retain Mixed Use Zoning of 736 736 Great South Rd,
Centres/Terrace
Great South Rd, Manukau
Manukau
Housing Apartment
Use
Retain the metropolitan town
Metropolitan Town
Centres/Terrace
centre zone for Manukau
Centre zone
Housing Apartment
Use
Retain the General Business zone 652 Great South Road, Business to other
for 652 Great South Road,
Manukau
Business Zone
Manukau
(excludes mixed use
and centres zones)
Retain Metropolitan Centre
Manukau Metropolitan Centres/Terrace
Zoning over Westfield's site in
Centre Westfield
Housing Apartment
Manukau, as shown in
'Submission 9 Schedule 2: Map of
Use
Westfield's site in Manukau' on p
27/43 vol 4 of submission. [23/43
vol 4]
Rezoneland on Lambie Drive and Lambie Drive and
Special Purpose
Druces Road,Manurewaas
Druces
shown in the submission [refer to Road,Manurewa
page 35/104] from Mixed Housing
Suburban and Light Industry to
Public Open Space and Special
Purpose Zone.
Rezoneland on Marble
Marble
Special Purpose
Place,Manurewaas shown in the Place,Manurewa
fromMixed Housing Suburbanto
Special Purpose.
Rezoneland on Lambie Drive and Lambie Drive and
Special Purpose
Druces Road,Manurewaas
Druces
shown in the submission [refer to Road,Manurewaas
page 35/104] from Mixed Housing
Suburban and Light Industry to
Public Open Space and Special
Purpose Zone.
Page 8

SUBMITTER
SUB
NAME
Forum New
Zealand (Attn:
Graeme Scott)
867-88
867-89
878-5
1221-1
2260-1
3159-1
4320-1
TOPIC
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
New Zealand Fire Highbrook
and
Service
Manukau
Commission
City Central
New Zealand Fire Highbrook
Service
and
Commission
Manukau
City Central
Waste Disposal
Highbrook
Services
and
Manukau
City Central
Counties
Highbrook
Manukau Pacific and
Trust
Manukau
City Central
Chalmers
Highbrook
Properties Limited and
Manukau
City Central
CDL Land New
Highbrook
Zealand Limited and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Drinkrow
Industrial Estate
Limited
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
5256-120 The Roman
Highbrook
Catholic Bishop of and
the Diocese of
Manukau
Auckland
City Central
Highbrook
5259-174 Hugh Green
and
Limited
Manukau
City Central
Business

Analysis
SUB
PROPERTIES
AREA
SUBJECT TO
UNIT
SUMMARY
SUBMISSION
S10
Rezoneland on Marble
MHS
Place,Manurewaas shown in the
fromMixed Housing Suburbanto
Special Purpose.
S3
Retainthe zoning at341 East
341 East Tamaki
Tamaki Road, East Tamaki (Otara Road, East Tamaki
Fire Station) as Light Industrial.
S10
Planner's Position
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
PLANNER'S
PROPOSED
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
POSITION
SP
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
REASONS
Do not support rezoning from MHS to SP zoning. The land is held as private property and the
surrounding sites are zoned MHS. The MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
CHANGE
CHANGE
No change
No
No
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
Special Purpose
Manukau
PAUP ZONE
MHS
Heavy Industry Zone

East Tamaki
Zone (LIZ)
LI
LI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Support the retention of the LI zone for this zone. Site is an appropriate location for LI fronting two
arterial roads and located adjacent to other sites zoned LI. Retention of the LI zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
No change
No
No
Support retention of Light Industry zone. The site is currently used by the Papatoetoe Fire Service. No change
The site has existing use rights. Emergency services, which includes fire stations, are permitted in
the LI zone. The LI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI zone and
Support the retention of the HI zoning for the site. The site carries out waste disposal activities which No change
have the potential to create odour and reverse sensitivity issues. As such it is an appropriate activity
in the HI zone surrounded by a buffer of LI zoned land. Retention of the HI zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the HI zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SP - Major Recreation Facility zone for Pacific Events Cultural Centre. This is No change
the appropriate zoning for the Pacific Events Centre. The SP - Major Recreation Facility zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No
No
No
No
No
No
Support retention of LI zone. The LI zone provides a buffer between the HI zone and the residential No change
zonings of the area. Retention of LI is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI
No
No
Retain the zoning at 15A Lambie

Drive, Manukau Central
(Papatoetoe Fire Station), as
Light Industrial.
Retain the Heavy Industry zoning
of the Waste Disposal Services
site at Neales Road, East
Tamaki.
Retain the Special -Purpose
Major Recreation Facility zoning
of 770R Great South Rd,
Manukau
Retain the zoning of 11 Dalgety
Drive, Wiri as Light Industry.
15A Lambie Drive,

Manukau Central
Heavy Industry Zone

Manukau
Zone (LIZ)
LI
LI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
33 Neales Road, East

Tamaki
Heavy Industry Zone

East Tamaki
Zone (LIZ)
HI
HI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
SP-MRF
SP-MRF
N/A
11 Dalgety Drive, Wiri Heavy Industry Zone

Manukau
Zone (LIZ)
LI
LI
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
S10
Rezone 8 Diversey Lane, Wiri

(Section 9 SO 64216 [infer
460605], Section 18 SO 433595
and Section 16 SO 433595), from
Heavy Industry to Light Industry.
Heavy Industry Zone

Manukau
Zone (LIZ)
HI
LI
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from HI to LI zone. Rezoning to LI would result in the loss of scarce heavy No change
industrial land. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are
important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area. Retention of HI
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
(This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)
No
No
S3
Retain Heavy Industry zone on

Drinkrow Industrial Estate land
[former East Tamaki Quarry]
8 Diversey Lane, Wiri

(Section 9 SO 64216
[infer 460605], Section
18 SO 433595 and
Section 16 SO
433595),
Harris Road and
Crooks Road, East
Tamaki
Heavy Industry Zone

East Tamaki
Zone (LIZ)
HI
HI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No
No
S3
Rezone 28 and 32 Bishop Dunn

Place to the new requested
Special Purpose - Places of
Worship.
Retain the Heavy Industry zone
for 210 and 216 Roscommon
Road, Wiri.
28 and 32 Bishop
Dunn Place, East
Tamaki.
Special purpose
LI
SP - Places of
Worship
N/A
No
No
210 and 216

Roscommon Road,
Wiri.
Heavy Industry Zone

Manukau
Zone (LIZ)
HI
HI
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
ACCEPT IN FULL;
SUPPORT RETAIN
Support retention of the HI zone. This cluster of HI zoning around the Drinkrow Industrial Estate
No change
provides an area for industrial activities. The area is surrounded by a band of LI to create a buffer to
residential sites. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change from LI to SP - Places of Worship. Council's position on the SP - Places of
No change
Worship zone is to remove it from the PAUP. Refer to evidence of Trevor Mackie Topic 055. No
change is recommended and the notified zone of LI should be retained. Existing use rights will allow
the activities on site to continue.
Support retention of HI zone. RPS addresses the need to retain HI zoning within Auckland where
No change
possible. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these zones are
important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area. Retention of the
HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning to provide for a range
of activities and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)
No
No
Do not support rezoning from HI to LI zones. Rezoning to LI would result in the loss of scarce
heavy industrial land The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these
zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area.
Importantly, retaining Plunket Avenue HI zoning provides for larger HI zoned block and a better
protection against possible reverse sensitivity effects that could arise. Retention of the HI zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This
position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)
Support the retention of the HI zoning for the site. This zone provides for activities with a reduced
level of amenity. The HI zone surrounded by a buffer of LI zoned land. Retention of the HI zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the HI zone and give effect to the RPS.
No change
No
No
No change
No
No
S3
S10
S10
S10
770R Great South Rd, Special Purpose

Manukau
Manukau
East Tamaki
5883-4
AMP Capital
Highbrook
Property Portfolio and
Limited et al
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone the land at 70 - 100

Plunket Avenue, Manukau from
Heavy Industry to Light Industry
[refer also to point number 3].
70 - 100 Plunket
Avenue, Manukau
Heavy Industry Zone

Manukau
Zone (LIZ)
HI
LI
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
5947-2
AML Limited and

Allied Concrete
Limited
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S3
Retain Tamaki Site (45 Cryers

Road, East Tamaki) as Heavy
Industry zone.
45 Cryers Road, East

Tamaki
Heavy Industry Zone

East Tamaki
Zone (LIZ)
HI
HI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
S3
90, 94, 110, 120

Cryers Road and 41
Trugood Drive, East
Tamaki
Heavy Industry Zone

East Tamaki
Zone (LIZ)
HI
LI
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support change of zone from HI to LI. Refer to evidence of Mr Roger Eccles for Auckland
No change
Council topic 051-054. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these
zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and South Auckland in particular. Retention
of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the HI zone and give effect
to the RPS.
No
No
6193-24
Goodman
Property Trust
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone 94 Cryers Road, East

Tamaki and the surrounding sites
fronting Cryers Road from 90
Cryers Road through to Trugood
Drive, from Heavy Industry to
Light Industry.
Rezone 70-100 Plunket Ave,
Manukau from Heavy Industry to
Light Industry.
70 - 100 Plunket
Avenue, Manukau
Heavy Industry Zone

Manukau
Zone (LIZ)
HI
LI
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No
6933-1
Frucor Beverages Highbrook

Limited
and
Manukau
City Central
PACT Group
Highbrook
(New Zealand)
and
Limited
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Retain Heavy Industry zone for 93 93 and 97 Plunket Ave Heavy Industry Zone
Manukau
and 97 Plunket Ave and 22 Orb
and 22 Orb Ave, Wiri. (HIZ) and Light Industry
Ave, Wiri.
Zone (LIZ)
HI
HI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No
S3
No change
No
No
PACT Group
(New Zealand)
Limited
S3

of 100 Harris Rd, East Tamaki.
ALTERNATIVEly rezone 100
Harris Rd and the surrounding
sites bounded by Harris Rd,
Neales Rd, Carpenter Rd and
Stonedon Dr, East Tamaki to Light
Industry subject to the
amendments to this zone
of 43 Cryers Rd, 63 Neales Rd
and 29 Carpenter Rd, East
Tamaki
No change
No
No
6096-76
7109-36
7109-42
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
100 Harris Rd, East

Tamaki
Heavy Industry Zone

East Tamaki
Zone (LIZ)
HI
HI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from HI to LI zones. Rezoning to LI would result in the loss of scarce
heavy industrial land The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places in these
zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau area.
Importantly, retaining Plunket Avenue HI zoning provides for larger HI zoned block and a better
protection against possible reverse sensitivity effects that could arise. Retention of the HI zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone gives effect to the RPS. (This
position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)
Support retention of rezoning to HI zone. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes
places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the
Manukau area. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)
43 Cryers Rd, 63
Neales Rd and 29
Carpenter Rd, East
Tamaki
Heavy Industry Zone

East Tamaki
Zone (LIZ)
HI
HI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Page 9

SUB
2466-31
SUBMITTER
NAME
Wiri Business
Association
Incorporated
TOPIC
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business

Analysis
SUB
PROPERTIES
AREA
SUBJECT TO
UNIT
SUMMARY
SUBMISSION
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
S10
Rezone Light Industry (south/west west of Roscommon
Heavy Industry Zone
Manukau
of the Wiri area (in the block to
Road and north of Kiwi (HIZ) and Light Industry
the west of Roscommon Road and Tamaki Road
Zone (LIZ)
north of Kiwi Tamaki Road; and
the area around to the west of
Hautu Road and Ha Crescent) to
Heavy Industry, as stated in the
submission [refer page 16/49 a
2466-32
Wiri Business
Association
Incorporated
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
3698-66
Atlas Concrete
Limited (Wiri)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
3698-67
Atlas Concrete
Limited (Wiri)
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Manukau Harbour Highbrook
Restoration
and
Society
Manukau
City Central
Business
Wiri Oil Services Highbrook
Limited
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Require residential areas within

Area Wide
the Air Quality Sensitive Activity
Restriction overlay buffer areas to
be zoned single dwelling.
S10
Rezone land in the vicinity of

wharves, jetties and boat ramps
around the Manukau Harbour
foreshore to provide for parking
and other support activities.
Amend the zoning of sites to the
south of the Wiri Oil TermiNol,
between the termiNol boundary
and Hautu Drive, from Light
Industry to Heavy Industry.
Fletcher Building
Group
S3
Retain the Light Industry zone at

27 Smales Road, East Tamaki.
S10
S10
3738-11
5682-16
5819-6
5791-61
1889-9
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
Carter Holt
Highbrook
Harvey Limited
and
Manukau
City Central
James Kirkpatrick Highbrook
Group Limited
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10
Rezone the Heavy Industry area,

bound by the railway line in the
east, Dalgety Drive and Kerrs
Road, Hobill Avenue in the west,
and Wiri Station Road to the
north) to Light Industry, as stated
and shown in a map in the
submission [refer page 17/49].
Retain Heavy Industry zoning on
101 Roscommon Road, Wiri.
PAUP ZONE
LI
Planner's Position
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
PLANNER'S
PROPOSED
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
POSITION
HI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
CHANGE OF ZONE
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
REASONS
CHANGE
CHANGE
Support rezoning from LI to HI under the Operative Plan the area is zoned Quarry zone. The former HI
Yes
Quarry zone operated under similar controls as HI zoning and as a consequence it is less likely that
reverse sensitivity issues will arise. This provides an opportunity to extend the existing HI zoning
within the former quarry area. Rezoning to HI is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the HI zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)
No
railway line in the

Heavy Industry Zone
Manukau
east, Dalgety Drive
and Kerrs Road, Hobill Zone (LIZ)
Avenue in the west,
and Wiri Station
Road., Manukua
HI
LI
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Do not support rezoning from HI to LI zoning. Support retention of rezoning to HI zone. Rezoning to
LI zone would result in the loss of scarce heavy industrial land. The HI zone and the associated
manufacturing that takes places in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland
and particularly in the Manukau area. Retention of the HI zonings the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the
051-054 evidence.)
No change
No
No
101 Roscommon
Road, Wiri.
HI
HI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No
Mixed Housing
Auckland Wide SH/MU/LI
Urban/Mixed Housing
SH
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No change
No
No
Area Wide
Public Open Space
POS-IR
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
CHANGE; SUPPORT
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
Support retention of rezoning to HI zone. The RPS address the need to retain HI zoning within
Auckland where possible. PAUP aims to provide enough HI zoned land to meet Auckland long term
business and employment needs. The HI zone and the associated manufacturing that takes places
in these zones are important sources of employment in Auckland and particularly in the Manukau
area. Retention of the HI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)
Support retention of SH zoning where practicable to limit reverse sensitivity constraints and loss of
amenity in relation to residential zoning. In reality this can only be applied where there is an existing
SH zone and this is not always the case as there may be other residential zoning with existing use
rights in an area with reverse sensitivity constraints. The SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
manage reverse sensitivity effects, to achieve the objectives of the zoning gives effect to the RPS.
Most ramps and jetties are in POS zones that allow for car parking areas or reserve area that
provided for supporting activities. The notified POS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
relevant objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
No
No
Hautu Drive
Heavy Industry Zone

Manukau
Zone (LIZ)
LI
HI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
CHANGE OF ZONE
Yes
No
27 Smales Road, East Heavy Industry Zone

East Tamaki
Tamaki.
Zone (LIZ)
LI
LI
N/A
SUPPORT IN FULL;
RETENTION OF
NOTIFIED ZONE
No
No
Rezone 195 Browns Road,

Manurewa from Light Industry to
Heavy Industry.
195 Browns Road,

Manurew
LI
HI
No
No
Submission incorrectly coded to

Topic 017 - RUB South. As
identified in paragraph 5.1 of the
Council's evidence in chief for the
Southern RUB in the vicinity of
Puhinui, the submission will be
considered in the Council's
evidence for Topic 081 Rezoning
and Precincts (Geographical
Areas). Submission seeks to
rezone the block of land bounded
by State Highway 20 to the east,
State Highway 20B/Puhinui Road
to the north, Prices Road to the
west and Puhinui Stream to the
south, Wiri
from Rural Production to General
Business.
The block of land

bounded by State
(RUB) and rezoning
Highway 20 to the
east, State Highway
20B/Puhinui Road to
the north, Prices Road
to the west, and
Puhinui Stream to the
south. The Southern
Gateway Consortium
constituting a number
of individual
companies are the
majority owners of this
block of land.
RP
GB
Yes
No
Heavy Industry Zone

Manukau
Zone (LIZ)
Auckland wide. POS-IR
Heavy Industry Zone

Manukau
Zone (LIZ)
Puhinui
Support rezoning from LI to HI Under the Operative Plan the area is zoned Quarry zone. The former HI
Quarry zone operated under similar controls as HI zoning and as a consequence it is less likely that
reverse sensitivity issues will arise. This provides an opportunity to extend the existing HI zoning
within the former quarry area. Rezoning to HI is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the HI zone and gives effect to thee RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)
Support retention of the LI zone. The site is located within the East Tamaki industrial area where
No change
there is a heavy industry core surrounded by light industry activities. Retaining this cluster of
industrial activities is supported with light industry creating a buffer between HI and residential
areas. Retention of the LI zone is the most appropriate way to acheive the objectives of the LI zone
N/A
DO NOT SUPPORT
Do not support rezoning from LI to HI. Proposed HI zone directly opposite Browns Road MHS area. No change
CHANGE; SUPPORT The LI zone provides a higher threshold for air quality and better protects the amenity of residential
RETENTION OF
areas. Retention of the LI zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
NOTIFIED ZONE
and gives effect to the RPS. (This position is consistent with the 051-054 evidence.)
Precinct:
DO NOT SUPPORT
The request to rezone this block of land (i.e. the Southern Gateway Consortiums land) from RP to
LI
Mangere Puhinui CHANGE; SUPPORT GB is not supported as it will not give effect to B3.1 of the RPS. The Council has undertaken
Infrastructure
ALTERNATIVE ZONE structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Council's position to partially shift the
Overlays:
RUB at Puhinui. LI zoning of the land is consistent with the Councils position to rezone all the land
Aircraft Noise
south of Waokauri Creek (including the Consortiums land) to LI, and is compatible with the LI and HI
Auckland Airport
zoning respectively of the nearby Noel Burnside/Diversity Lane area, and Mclaughlins Road area.
Aircraft Noise
Rezoning to LI is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LI zone and gives effect
Notification Area
to the RPS.
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Moderate Aircraft
Noise Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
High Aircraft Noise
Area
Historic Heritage
Overlay:
Sites and Places
of Value to Mana
Whenua
Page 10

SUB
4813-1
SUBMITTER
NAME
Tunicin
Investments
Limited
and Airface
Limited
TOPIC
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business

Analysis
SUB
AREA
UNIT
SUMMARY
S10
State Highway
20B/Puhinui Road to the north,
Prices Road to the west and
Puhinui Stream to the south, Wiri
Business.
PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
The block of land
bounded by State
(RUB) and rezoning
Highway 20 to the
east, State Highway
20B/Puhinui Road to
to the west, and
south. The Southern
Gateway Consortium
of individual
companies are the
block of land.
PAUP ZONE
RP
Planner's Position
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
PLANNER'S
PROPOSED
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
POSITION
GB
Precinct:
DO NOT SUPPORT
Mangere Puhinui CHANGE; SUPPORT
Infrastructure
ALTERNATIVE ZONE
Overlays:
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Aircraft Noise
Notification Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Moderate Aircraft
Noise Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
High Aircraft Noise
Area
Historic Heritage
Overlay:
Sites and Places
of Value to Mana
Whenua
REASONS
GB is not supported as it will not give effect to B3.1 of the RPS. The Council has undertaken
structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Council's position to partially shift the
to the RPS.
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
CHANGE
CHANGE
LI
Yes
No
4845-2
Southern
Gateway
Consortium
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

State Highway
Business.
The block of land

bounded by State
(RUB) and rezoning
Highway 20 to the
east, State Highway
20B/Puhinui Road to
to the west, and
south. The Southern
Gateway Consortium
of individual
companies are the
block of land.
Puhinui
RP
GB
Precinct:
DO NOT SUPPORT
Infrastructure
ALTERNATIVE ZONE
Overlays:
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Aircraft Noise
Notification Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Moderate Aircraft
Noise Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
High Aircraft Noise
Area
Historic Heritage
Overlay:
Sites and Places
of Value to Mana
Whenua
LI
to the RPS.
Yes
No
4938-1
Landplan
Property Partners
Manukau Limited
and Reading
Properties
Partners Limited
Highbrook
and
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

State Highway
Business.
The block of land

bounded by State
(RUB) and rezoning
Highway 20 to the
east, State Highway
20B/Puhinui Road to
to the west, and
south. The Southern
Gateway Consortium
of individual
companies are the
block of land.
Puhinui
RP
GB
Precinct:
DO NOT SUPPORT
Infrastructure
ALTERNATIVE ZONE
Overlays:
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Aircraft Noise
Notification Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Moderate Aircraft
Noise Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
High Aircraft Noise
Area
Historic Heritage
Overlay:
Sites and Places
of Value to Mana
Whenua
LI
to the RPS.
Yes
No
Page 11

SUB
5145-7
SUBMITTER
NAME
TOPIC
Auckland
Highbrook
Developers Group and
Manukau
City Central
Business

Analysis
SUB
PROPERTIES
AREA
SUBJECT TO
UNIT
SUMMARY
SUBMISSION
S10
Puhinui Peninsula
provide residential and business
growth in Drury, Alfriston, Karaka,
Flat Bush and Puhinui.
Reject development in Paerata
Planner's Position
SUBMISSION THEME
LOCALITY
(RUB) and rezoning
PAUP ZONE
RP

Forum New
and
Zealand
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

Puhinui Peninsula
rezone land on the Puhinui
Peninsula as shown in the
from
Rural to Future Urban.

(RUB) and rezoning
Puhinui
RP
5280-190 The New Zealand Highbrook

Institute of
and
Architects
Manukau
City Central
Business
S10

Puhinui Peninsula
rezone land on the Puhinui
Peninsula as shown in the
from
Rural to Future Urban.

(RUB) and rezoning
Puhinui
RP
RELEVANT
OVERLAYS,
ZONE
CONSTRAINTS
GB
Precinct:
Mangere Puhinui
Mana Whenua
Management
Infrastructure
Overlays:
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Aircraft Noise
Notification Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Moderate Aircraft
Noise Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
High Aircraft Noise
Area
Notural Heritage
Overlay:
Outstanding
Notural Features,
ID 22, Crater Hill
Outstanding
Notural Features,
ID 166, Pukaki
Lagoon Volcano
Historic Heritage
Overlay:
FU
Precinct:
Mangere Puhinui
Mana Whenua
Management
Infrastructure
Overlays:
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Aircraft Noise
Notification Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Moderate Aircraft
Noise Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
High Aircraft Noise
Area
Notural Heritage
Overlay:
Outstanding
Notural Features,
ID 22, Crater Hill
Outstanding
Notural Features,
ID 166, Pukaki
Lagoon Volcano
Historic Heritage
Overlay:
FU
Precinct:
Mangere Puhinui
Mana Whenua
Management
Infrastructure
Overlays:
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Aircraft Noise
Notification Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
Moderate Aircraft
Noise Area
Aircraft Noise
Auckland Airport
High Aircraft Noise
Area
Notural Heritage
Overlay:
Outstanding
Notural Features,
ID 22, Crater Hill
Outstanding
Notural Features,
ID 166, Pukaki
Lagoon Volcano
Historic Heritage
Overlay:
Page 12
PLANNER'S
PROPOSED
POSITION
SUPPORT IN PART;
PARTIAL CHANGE
REASONS
The request to provide residential and business growth is supported in the Puhinui Peninsula. The
Council has undertaken structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Councils
position to partially shift the RUB at Puhinui. Rezoning the land from RP to LI and LL zoning (to
provide for future business and residential development and growth) is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the two zones and gives effect to the RPS.
PROPOSED
ZONE
GIS MAP
CHANGE
CHANGE
LI and LL
Yes
No
DO NOT SUPPORT
The request to rezone the land from RP to FU is not supported. The Council has undertaken
LI and LL
CHANGE; SUPPORT structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Councils position to partially shift the
ALTERNATIVE ZONE RUB at Puhinui. Rezoning the land from RP to LI and LL, subject to precinct provisions to manage
the effects of future development on the cultural landscape values of Puhinui, and to ensure that
staged development of the land is co-ordinated with the provision of infrastructure; is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the two zones and gives effect to the RPS.
Yes
No
DO NOT SUPPORT
The request to rezone the land from RP to FU is not supported. The Council has undertaken
LI and LL
CHANGE; SUPPORT structure planning for the Puhinui area, which has informed the Councils position to partially shift the
ALTERNATIVE ZONE RUB at Puhinui. Rezoning the land from RP to LI and LL, subject to precinct provisions to manage
the effects of future development on the cultural landscape values of Puhinui, and to ensure that
staged development of the land is co-ordinated with the provision of infrastructure; is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the two zones and gives effect to the RPS.
Yes
No
ATTACHMENT D: Analysis of Area-Wide Submissions

SUBMISSION POINT
SUBMITTER NAME
SUMMARY
3698-67
Atlas Concrete Limited (Wiri)
Require residential areas

within the Air Quality
Sensitive Activity
Restriction overlay buffer
areas to be zoned single
dwelling.
3738-11
Manukau Harbour
Restoration Society
Rezone land in the vicinity

of wharves, jetties and
boat ramps around the
Manukau Harbour
foreshore to provide for
parking and other support
activities.
ATTACHMENT E: Planning Maps
Pakuranga, Farm Cove,

Pakuranga Heights,
Burswood, Golflands
Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan

Submission Area Unit
Zoning submissions and zones as notified
South
Tr
ug
oo
d
sm
Op it
o
Lane
Dr ive
Le ixl ep
Road
sleton
Lis
Lushin
Cotte
D riv
e
n gi

Mixed Housing Urban
liam A
yD
rive
llawa
wa y D
se
Local Centre
Town Centre
lly
Ba
Lan
Gr ansna
City Centre
Mixed Use
General Business
Business Park
do La
n
ce
n Rise
Pla
Light Industry
Heavy Industry
ne
ga
Metropolitan Centre
Botany, Point View

Drive, Dannemora,
Flat Bush
do
Rural Conservation
Countryside Living
venso
ce
P la
ce
F een
Cr e
e
ron
Bally
Green Infrastructure Corridor
Wan
Ba
sa
lt
Barmac Pla c
e
Sir W
il
Road
rd Clos
sh Place
Future Urban
Ke lla
Ke
Fransh
eS
Lad y Ruby Driv
lcoo
Be R
e dc astle D riv
e
n Close
rr
e
Place
Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings
Sprin
gs
ce
Lif
fey
Harris
Road
Driv
ad
urn R
o
ackb
Pl
in
Pla
la
c
Ca r
e
k Driv
deric
Road
Hilbo
rn
e
ac
Drive
Ca
pt
a
Single House
ofin Driv
dro
me
d
y Crescent
Co
An
lace
Be
rni
gP
er
rw
C lo
n k ill Pl a
or
ti
Kil
ba
ha
Bl
venu e
Avenue
Sh
a
an
n D ri v
Cr
esc
en
t
r Plac
e
Dr ive
pente
r R oa
d
R on
e
Pla
c
Ha
li
da y
St
Ora D
rive
Ra
Ros
s
Smales Roa d
a
yw
rk
ad
ll
Ba
ani
a
Large Lot
Srah Pl ac
scent
ro
resce
nt
ell C
resce
n
t
Saye
s
ki p
hb
Lil y
Hig
Place
Ke
rw yn
at a a
r
Special Purpose
rive
nk C
Road
Allens R
o
Zel
Unitary Plan Zone - As Notified
ri en
Croo
ks
Zelanian Driv
Retain
Road
er
Close
Lo
enu
e
ba
d Av
Amend
Waih
i Wa
y
On
er
oa
R oa d
Have
n D rive
Gu y s
Neil p
d
Re i
ce
Properties subject to a submission
Ro
ad
c
Pla
orestea
ce
iki
P la
iw ir
u nt D r i v
is
ar e
ac
et
ek
r ik
lace
h a us
Gree
nm o
Pl
e
Str
rive
k
Pu
ke
Pu
i
k iw
c
Pla
Plac
e
O ffe n
od
rw o
s C
rD
nt
r e sce
o ba
El K
o
Sir W
olf
riv
rD
he
s
i
F
Ro
Anali
eP
de
Un
ok
e
riv
Drive
Br uce
Highbrook
Ech
elo
n
Road
l
Po
iv e
Neale
s
on D
r
Pla
lac
gto n P
Riplington R
oad
M
od
n ed
Dr
iv
e
Park
wo
eP
Way
to
Place
to
n
o ha
Te K
enue
i ll i
Bosto
ck
rs Road
Crye
LEGEND
or
ad
Ro
ort Place
n sp
Tra
orth
eN
rad
Pa
ru
W aiou
ve
Nan
dina
Av
Hun tingto n
ad
ive
Dr
Ro
i
Dr
ur u
s
es
sin
Bu
io
Wa
onedon
ul
Ste
Rural Coastal
Pa
c
Ac
Mixed Rural
r iv
tD
en
e
lac
g
Re
v
Sa
Rural Production
lace
yP
or
Public Open Space - Conservation

Public Open Space - Informal Recreation
Public Open Space - Sport and Active Recreation
Pl
ace
Kor
d
el
Be
a le
Public Open Space - Community
rk P
Bi
sh
o
Road [i]
Defence [rcp/dp]
Dun n P
am
gh Road
Newa
lace
Public Open Space - Civic Spaces

Birm
in
Otara
S3
Highbrook
Ferry Terminal [rcp/dp]
lac
e
Minor Port [rcp/dp]
Way
Papatoetoe,
Hunters Corner,
Middlemore, Mangere
East, Wymondley
Papatoetoe
Herit
ag
sive W
General Coastal Marine [rcp]
ay
O rm
e Wa
Water [i]
Lenihan P
la c e
lace
Mooring [rcp]
Bish
o
Progr
es
Jarvis
Amuri P
Laidla
w Wa
y
Marina [rcp/dp]
n
isto
d
oa
Coastal Transition
Flat Bush, Botany Junction

Flat Bush and
Botany Junction
Hauraki Gulf Islands

Rural Urban Boundary [rps] as notified
Indicative Coastline
Note : Submissions mapped include Topic 080 and 081
150
300
Date: 19/01/2016
600 m
Pakuranga, Farm Cove,

Pakuranga Heights,
Burswood, Golflands

Revised zones
South
Tr
ug
Road
D riv
e
Lif
fey
Harris
Road
Drive
er
Future Urban
rive
ay D
Fransh

Ke
lla
w
ad
rn Ro
ackbu
Pl
Roa d
Car
pen
t er
Road
Hilbo
rn
e
ac
Local Centre
Town Centre
ce
eS
n k ill Pl a
Crescent
liam A
lcoo
Be R
e dc astle D
Sprin
gs
La d y Ruby Driv
Place
r ro
Ba
sa
lt
Barmac Pla c
e
Sir W
il
Road
en
t
res
c
ny
Cr e
Drive
Pla
ce
Mixed Housing Urban
Bl
an
n D ri v
Avenue
r om
ed a
n gi
e
Ha
lid
ay P
lac
S
ve
Ra
rk
Sh
a
Fe e
Ros
s
Smales Roa d
scent
ad
ki p
nd
Single House
rive
Metropolitan Centre
Botany, Point View

Drive, Dannemora,
Flat Bush
City Centre
Mixed Use
General Business
Business Park
fin D
riv e
Large Lot
k Cre
scen
t
ell C
resce
nt
Saye
s
Co
rw
rwy
n
Special Purpose
Ma
tara
an
Road
venu e
Ke
Revised zone
Road
Allens R
o
Zel
ani
a
Place
Area of change - out of scope
Waih
i Wa
y
On
er
oa
R oa d
Haven
D rive
Li l
Ora D
ri
Riplington Ro
ad
Close
d
Rei
riv
e
Area of change
yb
u nt D
e
riv
r ien
Road
nmo
Ro
ad
Gu y s
et
tre
a
Neil p
Lo
Gree
Crook
s
ace
Hu n t
S
od
e
lac
iP
iri k
w
i
ek
uk
Park
wo
e
ac
lace
n ha u
a Pl
in
gt
on
Pl
Plac
e
Said
i
Road
Neale
s
Of f e
Anali
eP
wo
Place
LEGEND
enue
od
Ech
elo
n
de r
Un
olf
rive
rD
oba
El K
o
Sir W
Cryers
Nan
dina
Av
oha
Te K
orth
eN
rad
Pa
Bosto
ck
Highbro ok
Drive
riv
rD
he
s
i
F
Dr
s
es
sin
Bu
ru
W aiou
ve
S3
Highbrook
ive
Dr
tonedon
ad
Ro
oo
d
Light Industry
Heavy Industry
Rural Conservation
Countryside Living
Rural Coastal
iv e
Dr
nt
ce
Ac
Rural Production
e
lac
g
Re
P
ry
vo
Sa
lace

Pl
ac
e
Ko
rd
P
el
Mixed Rural
ale
Be

Birm
ingh
am
Road [i]
Bi
sh
op
Dun n P
Road
Otara
lac
Defence [rcp/dp]
Minor Port [rcp/dp]
Marina [rcp/dp]
Papatoetoe,
Hunters Corner,
Middlemore, Mangere
East, Wymondley
Papatoetoe
Laidla
w Wa
y
Herit
ag

Water [i]
Coastal Transition
Way
Plac
Jarvis
Amuri
Mooring [rcp]
e Wa

Flat Bush and
Botany Junction

Revised Rural Urban Boundary
Note : Zone changes include Topic 080, 081 016 & 017
150
300
Date: 19/01/2016
600 m
rive
at D
tre
Re

R etr e
Papatoetoe,
Hunters Corner,
Middlemore, Mangere
East, Wymondley
Papatoetoe
at D
e
riv
ki
R
S10a
LEGEND

Amend
Pu
ka
South
Puhinui
oa
Retain

Pu
ka
Special Purpose
ki
Ro
ad
Large Lot
Single House
Mixed Housing Urban
So
ut
es
-W
Future Urban
te
rn
M
ot
or
R
oa
d
Local Centre
Town Centre
Metropolitan Centre
oad
Or
rs
wa
y
R
ices
Pr
oad
aR
p an
Cam
Mangere
City Centre
Mixed Use
es
Pric
General Business
R oa
d
Business Park
Light Industry
Heavy Industry
Rural Conservation
Countryside Living
Manukau
Central
and Wiri
Rural Coastal
Mixed Rural
Rural Production
Road [i]
Defence [rcp/dp]
Minor Port [rcp/dp]
Marina [rcp/dp]
Mooring [rcp]
Water [i]
Coastal Transition
Manurewa,
Homai and
Clendon Park

175
350
Date: 19/01/2016
700 m
rive
at D
tre
Re

Revised zones
Papatoetoe,
Hunters Corner,
Middlemore, Mangere
East, Wymondley
Papatoetoe
South
S10a
Puhinui
LEGEND
Area of change
Revised zone
Pu
ka
k
Special Purpose
iR
oa
Large Lot
Single House
Mixed Housing Urban
ou
Future Urban
th
-W
t
es
Mangere
M
ot
or
w
er
p
Cam
Town Centre
Metropolitan Centre
d
Roa
R
oa
d
Local Centre
ic es
Pr
d
R oa
ana
Or
rs
ay
City Centre
Mixed Use
General Business
Business Park
Light Industry
Heavy Industry
Rural Conservation
Countryside Living
Manukau
Central
and Wiri
Rural Coastal
Mixed Rural
Rural Production
Road [i]
Defence [rcp/dp]
Minor Port [rcp/dp]
Marina [rcp/dp]
Mooring [rcp]
Water [i]
Coastal Transition
Manurewa,
Homai and
Clendon Park
175
350
Date: 19/01/2016
700 m
le
l a ce
nt
ce
e
Rural Coastal
Pl
ac
ace
e D
rive
a
ici
el
Mixed Rural
Rural Production
Pla
ea
al
Rata
Pl
ureli a
La
e
w Plac
Countryside Living

C
on a
Ger
t
r
u
o
aC
om
Pal

c
re s
t
en
aR
om
Tac
Rural Conservation
Az
C a ve
n
nR
oa d
lac
t
ee
S tr
en
re
ts
ven
ific E
ce
Roa
Heavy Industry
n al
Light Industry
e
D riv
d
Roa
ce
Pac
tre
C en
Vi
Ke ll
P la
aP
Business Park
yst
eth
Am
rs
Ker
Ion
General Business
Ra
don
ce
Mixed Use
ff
tO
or
City Centre
rp
Ai
Ro
a
Metropolitan Centre
ff
R
p
Mc
Town Centre
am
lau
ghlin
s
Local Centre
ue
v en
re ll A
Inve
Ro
ad
lac e
ug
hlin
s
so
C ela
P la
ve
Dri
ard
ue
ven
nA
rb le
o sk e
ce
Mc
la
ay
W
Clis
ourt
dC
South-Western Motorway
Trevor
H
Ba
l
n
to

Road [i]
Defence [rcp/dp]
ge
Dal
ad
rive
ty D
yo
Ma
ad
Ro
A th
Bold
ood
erw
ce
Pla
yP
la ce
Ston
ehill
Driv
e
lac
Le y
Future Urban
cl
Ma
ce
Pla
Ro
Ro
ad
Ro
Sto n
Mc
v
ill
y
Ro
ad
Manurewa,
Homai and
Clendon Park
Minor Port [rcp/dp]

Marina [rcp/dp]
Mooring [rcp]
Water [i]
Coastal Transition
lD
onn
e
r iv
Ch
e h il
oad
ak i R
Tam
Kiw i
o ad
aki R
i Tam
Kiw
a
Costar Pl
yo
ce
Pla
od
o
rw
de
Bol
Mixed Housing Urban
Lake w o o
lace
iff e P
ad
Ma
ce n
ve
r iv e
tu D
Hau
oad
yR
gle
Lan
A sh
res
H au
ri
tu D
on
mm
sco
Ro
t
cen
C
Ha
s
Cre
Ha
Single House
gP
din
lad
Islay
ce
il
i
rm
Te
Large Lot
lace
Ea
d
Roa
nue
Ave
bill
Ho
lace
al P
ich
rl R
ld P
Ba rr
Jov
Oak
R
ces oa d
D ru
oad
nR
a t io
i St
rfie
C re s
P la
tio
ay
yW
To
ta
ne
Put
ay
yW
d
Roa
oad
sR
ay
W
urm a lin
ir i
Wi
Wir
ham
ers
B ake
Great South Ro
ad
O
ce
Dru
y
Wa
ies Ave nu e
Dav
riv
er D
oa d
Wilco P
lac e
ve
Dri
p
am
fR
Of
e
riv
bie D
LamLambie Drive On Ram p
ce
Pl a
Pla
ce
l
Vog
emi Way
ay
th H
e
Aven u
Ronwood
Stre
ad
Ro

Special Purpose
n
Stat io
Manukau
Ma na
Kei
y
rr
Retain
y
rke
F a l c on
Amend
ne
Put
y
Wa
sel
Ed
ue
LEGEND
Otara
y
Wa
nor
ven
rb A
endish Drive Off Ra m p

av
Je
a
Ele
vi s
ta
iv
Dr
ue
Ae
ro
h
dis
S10b
Manukau Central and Wiri
man
Am
e
lac
Sha
Drive
Cavendish
Puhinui
C
e
Fre
pa
l P lace
ad
Ro
ven
et A
id
e
v
w A enue
sgo
Gla
ue
ven
wA
slo
On
e
L an
ur
ns
P
r ek
Na
ue
ey
e rs
el
B
n
Av e
Div
No
nk
Pl u
s Place
d on
c he
Ar
n
Cle
Go
n
ld e
e
enu
Av
ale
sd
Ne
e
enu
l Av
Burr el
c
Pla
Me
ad
Ro
ue
ven
nA
yso
Gra
ly
fur
Ran
ue
ven
gA
ber
y
e
Fr
nue
Ave
ce
n
a
l
Bal
nue
Ave
on
d
d
Se
ue
ven
nA
o
s
in
Atk
ue
ven
tt A
Bre
Cir
e
n Plac
R ya
ue
ay A ven
Conw
ive
Dr
n
Rya
k
Ja c
u rt
Co
Pl
ac
e
aP
e
ka Plac
ie
mb
La
h
Leit
Iha
South
Iso
l
do a
m
Pe
tti
t

Flat Bush and
Botany Junction Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan
re s
yC
t
cen
140
280
Date: 19/01/2016
560 m
le
l a ce

Future Urban
d
Lake wo o
ourt
Local Centre
Town Centre
Great South Ro
ad
O
Metropolitan Centre
City Centre
ff
R
am
Mixed Use
e
la c
Pl
ac
ace
Mc
aR
om
Tac
Ba
l
ive
Ston
ehill
Dr

P
od
rwo
lac
Mc
v
ill
y
Blind and Low

Vision Education
Network N
Ro
ad
Homai
School
Manurewa
High School
Manurewa
Manurewa High
High School
School
t
en
rive
ty D
lde
Bo
c
re s
ge
Dal
ad
Ro
c
Pla
ad
Ro
o ad
ki R
ama
T
i
Kiw
Ath y
on
mm
sco
Ro
Wilco P
lac e
r iv e
tu D
Hau
d
Roa
yo
Ma
y
gle
Lan
ad
Ro
Rural Production
Pla
ea
on
Ger
rt
Cou
a
om
Pal
e
ac
Costar Pl
A sh
emi Way
ent
Mixed Rural
ce
e D
rive
a
ici
el
aC
oa d
c
res
aC
Rural Coastal
al
La
Pl
ureli a
Az
e
w Plac
Countryside Living
d
Roa
Heavy Industry
Rural Conservation
Vi
gh
Wiri
Central
School
Rata
rs
Ker
Light Industry
Ra
aP
Business Park
ff
tO
or
lau
rp
Ai
Ke ll
d
Roa
I on
ue
v en
re ll A
Inve
l
Ear
dso
h ar
Ric
ue
ven
nA
la c e
o
Trev r
General Business
Mixed Housing Urban
ay
W
ay
ske
Ho n Driv e
ad
gP
din
lad
Islay P
ce
Ro
Single House
n
to
W
ney
Put
P la
lins
ay
W
Le y
ham
a lin
lace
nue
Ave
bill
Ho
Wir
Oak
Wi
ood Av enue
Ronw
Tourm
ad
Ro
al P
Jov
e
Driv
oad
nR
a t io
t
S
i
Revised zone
Special Purpose
t
ee
Str
es
uc
Dr
Pla
ce
l er
Vog
South-Western Motorway
vi s
ta
Area of change
ive
ay
nW
p
am
fR
Of
l ac
Ha
Large Lot
Davies Avenu e
Ma
aP
Man
Ae
ro
th
Kei
rive
yD
ir
i Dr
ang
ad
n Ro
t atio
nu kau S
e
riv
bie D
Lam bie Drive On Ram p
Lam
i
vend sh Drive Off Ra m p
LEGEND
ue
Fa l
ad
Ro
c on
y
Wa
sel
Ed
e
e nu
y
Wa
nor
v
rb A
Ir
Te
a
eem
y
rke
Sh a
ven
onway A
kC
Jac
ive
Dr
ce
a
Ele
Pla
e
n Plac
ers
Am
Puhinui
Ca
ie
mb
La
rive
ish D
Ca vend
ue
ad
Fr
ven
et A
Ro
r ek
Na
v
w A enue
sgo
Gla
ue
ven
wA
slo
On
ur
ns
id
e
nk
Pl u
nue
Ave
on
d
d
Se
ue
ven
nA
o
s
in
Atk
R ya
S10b
Otara
n Spencer Drive
ad
Ro
ue
ven
eA
nue
Ave
ue
ven
nA
yso
Gra
tt
Bre
ue
ven
nA
ndo
Cle
el
B
c
la n
Bal
e
enu
Av
ale
sd
Ne
e
enu
l Av
Burr el
No
ly
fur
Ran
Fre
ue
ven
rg A
yb e
c
Ci r
lace
ka P
Ih a
t
ou r
hC
ma
Nor
Puhinui
School
o ma
Pl
ac
Iso
la P e
lace
Leit
South
nd
Pe
tti
t

Flat Bush and
Botany Junction Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan
Revised zones

Road [i]
Defence [rcp/dp]
Manurewa,
Homai and
Clendon Park
Minor Port [rcp/dp]

Marina [rcp/dp]
Mooring [rcp]
Water [i]
Coastal Transition
onn
Ch
cen
re s
yC
140
280
Date: 19/01/2016
560 m
ATTACHMENT F: Proposed Amendments outside the Scope of Submissions
SUB-REGION
SUB AREA
UNIT
South
Highbrook and Manukau City

Central Business
S10b
Alicante Avenue
Manukau Central
SH
MHS
South

Central Business
S10b
Browns Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Browns Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Browns Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
83
Browns Road
Manurewa
SH
MHS
South

Central Business
S10b
85
Browns Road
Manurewa
SH
MHS
South

Central Business
S10b
87
Browns Road
Manurewa
SH
MHS
South

Central Business
S10b
Costar Place
Manukau Central
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Great South Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Great South Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Great South Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Great South Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Great South Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Great South Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Great South Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Great South Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
MHU
Support rezoning of notified MHS zone to MHU. Managing flooding risks

on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The site is on a
RFN (Great South Rd). The rezoning is the most appropriate way to

Central Business
S10b
SUB AREA UNIT NAME
FULL STREET
NUMBER
REASON FOR CHANGE

Support rezoning of notified SH zone to MHS as although the SH zone
could be retained due to the site(s) being affected by flooding
constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone will
not generally achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise local context. Rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning of notified MHS zone to MHU. The site is close to an
RFN (Great South Rd) and a LC. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
RPS.
RPS.
Support rezoning of notified SH zone to MHS zone. Managing flooding
risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone
Support rezoning of notified MHS zone to MHU. The site is on a RFN
(Great South Rd) and close to a LC. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
effect to the RPS.
effect to the RPS.
effect to the RPS.
effect to the RPS.
effect to the RPS.
effect to the RPS.
effect to the RPS.
effect to the RPS.
South
TOPIC AREA
888
STREET NAME
Great South Road
SUBURB NAME
Manukau Central
Page 1
NOTIFIED ZONE
SH
PROPOSED ZONE
SUB-REGION
TOPIC AREA
SUB AREA
UNIT
SUB AREA UNIT NAME
FULL STREET
NUMBER
STREET NAME
SUBURB NAME
NOTIFIED ZONE
PROPOSED ZONE
REASON FOR CHANGE

(Great South Rd). The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
South

Central Business
S10b
890
Great South Road
Manukau Central
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
898
Great South Road
Manukau Central
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
902
Great South Road
Manukau Central
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Kerrs Road
Manukau Central
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Kerrs Road
Manukau Central
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Laurelia Place
Manukau Central
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
Orams Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
6A
Orams Road
Manurewa
MHS
MHU
South

Central Business
S10b
41
Pantera Way
Manukau Central
SH
MHS

Support rezoning of notified SH zone to MHS as although the SH zone
could be retained due to the site(s) being affected by flooding
constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone will
not generally achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise local context. Rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
South

Central Business
S10b
MHU

South

Central Business
S10b
MHU

South

Central Business
S10b
MHU

South

Central Business
S10b
MHU

14
20
22
24
Rata Vine Drive
Rata Vine Drive
Rata Vine Drive
Rata Vine Drive
Manukau Central
Manukau Central
Manukau Central
Manukau Central
Page 2
MHS
MHS
MHS
MHS


Council Evidence, Rezoning - Manukau and Highbrook

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Council Evidence, Rezoning - Manukau and Highbrook

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL

of the Resource Management Act 1991

of TOPIC 081f Rezoning and Precincts

of the submissions and further

JOINT EVIDENCE REPORT ON SUBMISSIONS

S3 area Botany, East Tamaki, Highbrook (25 submission points)

assessment, our position is broadly as follows:

Submissions seek to rezone sites to a higher or lower residential zone,

We support changes to zoning where the zoning

As a result of the rezoning analysis undertaken, we propose a number of zoning

Attachment D addresses area wide

submissions, on which we have relied in proposing a number of in scope area-wide or

PART A: OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND

Figure 1: Highbrook and Manukau Central City Business and Industry

Mark Bourne, Water Infrastructure Planning (Watercare Services Ltd);

Anthony Reidy, Zoning of Roads;

David Mead, Flooding and Natural Hazards ;

Deborah Rowe, Historic Heritage and the Pre-1944 Overlay ;

Lisa Mein, Historic Character; and

Peter Reaburn, Volcanic Viewshafts and Height Sensitive Areas.

STATUTORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK

The statutory framework is detailed in Section 5 of the evidence of Mr Duguid, dated 3

INTERIM GUIDANCE FROM THE PANEL

Chapter G: General Provisions, dated 9 March 2015;

Best practice approaches to re-zoning and precincts, dated 31 July 2015;

Air Quality, dated 25 September 2015; and

Chapter G General Provisions, dated 9 October 2015.

Chapter G: Regional and District Rules, dated 9 October 2015.

APPROACH TO ZONING WITHIN THE PAUP

particular areas where other transport investment is planned. These infrastructure

PART B: OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS

S3 area Botany, East Tamaki, Highbrook (25 submission points)

Any residential properties subject to a key overlay 31 submission points.

THAB isolated or new areas 16 submission points

Spot zoning 15 submission points.

Rural Urban Boundary (RUB) and rezoning 10 submission points.

Centres/Terrace Housing Apartment Buildings (THAB)/Mixed Use

Combined rezoning and precinct submission 6 submission points.

Special Purpose 5 submission points

Mixed Housing Urban/Mixed Housing Suburban/Single House

Centres Hierarchy 3 submission points.

Residential to other use 1 submission points.

Public open space 1 submission point.

Full analysis of the changes requested by these submission points is included in

Attachment C contains an analysis and position on individual submission points. On

Properties are often subject to a number of overlays and constraints.

As the word relevant in the heading of the constraints column suggests, we

Moving to the Reasons column, it should be noted that we do not

Attachment D addresses area wide submissions, on which we have relied in

The proposed zoning of land is aligned with the provision of infrastructure; in

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF SUBMISSIONS

10.1 As outlined in Mr Duguids evidence, a number of amendments are proposed which

Anna Jennings, Roger Eccles and David Wong

ATTACHMENT A: CVs of Report Writers

Manukau City Council

Planner, Planning South

March 2008 October

North Shore City Council

Jan 2006 Nov 2007

Transport, Auckland City

AFFLIATIONS AND CONFERENCES

ATTACHMENT B: ANALYSIS OF SUBMISSIONS BY THEME

Centres/Terrace Housing and

Two submissions seek to rezone an area from THAB to