Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 19

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:241

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10

Ketan S. Vakil (#191043)


kvakil@swlaw.com
Jeffrey M. Singletary (#233528)
jsingletary@swlaw.com
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
600 Anton Blvd, Suite 1400
Costa Mesa, California 92626-7689
Telephone: 714.427.7000
Facsimile: 714.427.7799
Glenn W. Trost (#116203)
gtrost@swlaw.com
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
350 S. Grand Ave., Suite 2600
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: 213.929.2500
Facsimile: 213.929.2525
Attorneys for Plaintiff SKITS, LLC

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

SKITS, LLC, a California limited


liability company,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21
22

v.
LTD COMMODITIES LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company;
ACI, INC., a New Jersey corporation;
DOES 1-10,
Defendants.

Case No. SACV1501591 JLS (DFMx)


The Honorable Josephine L. Staton
Ctrm.10A
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
FOR DAMAGES AND
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (PATENT
AND TRADEMARK
INFRINGEMENT; UNFAIR
COMPETITION); DEMAND FOR
JURY TRIAL
Trial Date:No Date Set
Initial Complaint Filed: October 2, 2015

23
24
25
26
27
28
Second Amended Complaint
SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 2 of 19 Page ID #:242

1
2

For its Second Amended Complaint herein, plaintiff SKITS, LLC (SKITS)
hereby alleges as follows:

PARTIES

4
5

1.

SKITS is a limited liability company organized and existing under the

laws of the state of California, having its principal place of business at 1801 East

Carnegie Avenue, Santa Ana, California 92705.

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

2.

SKITS is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that defendant

10

LTD Commodities LLC (LTD) is a limited liability company organized and

11

existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, having its principal place of

12

business at 2800 Lakeside Drive, Bannockburn, Illinois 60015.

13
14

3.

SKITS is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that LTD

15

regularly conducts business in, and has committed the acts alleged herein, within

16

this judicial district.

17
18

4.

SKITS is informed and believes, and thereon allege, that defendant

19

ACI, Inc. (ACI) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the

20

state of New Jersey, having its principal place of business at 950 3rd Ave., 20th

21

Floor, New York City, NY 10022.

22
23

5.

SKITS is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that ACI

24

regularly conducts business in, and has committed at least some of the acts alleged

25

herein, within the United States.

26
27
28

6.

SKITS does not know the true names and capacities of defendants

Does 1-10, inclusive, and therefore sues such defendants by fictitious names.
-1-

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 3 of 19 Page ID #:243

SKITS is informed and believes, and thereon allege, that each fictitiously named

defendant is in some manner responsible for the claims and causes of action alleged

herein and that the acts or omissions of said fictitious defendants proximately

caused damage and other harm alleged in this complaint. When SKITS ascertains

the actual names and capacities of Does 1-10, it will amend this complaint name

such defendants by their true names.

7
8

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

7.

SKITS is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that defendants,

and each of them, including defendants sued by fictitious names, are, and at all

10

times mentioned herein were, the alter-egos, parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners,

11

associates, joint-venturers, servants, employees, and/or other authorized

12

representatives of each of the remaining defendants, and in doing the things herein

13

alleged were acting within the course and scope of their authority, agency, and

14

employment, and with the knowledge, consent, and approval of their fellow

15

defendants, and each of them.

16
17

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

18
19

8.

This is an action for (A) patent infringement arising under the patent

20

laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 271 and 281; (B) trademark infringement

21

arising under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a); (C) false designation of origin arising under 15

22

U.S.C. 1125(a); (D) trademark infringement arising under the common law of the

23

state of California; and (E) unfair competition arising under the laws of the state of

24

California.

25
26

9.

This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 15

27

U.S.C. 1116(a) and 1121(a) and 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338 over the claims

28

arising under the laws of the United States. This Court has supplemental
-2-

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 4 of 19 Page ID #:244

jurisdiction over the remaining claims in this Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

1367(a) because the state law claims are so related to the federal claims that they

form part of the same case or controversy and derive from a common nucleus of

operative facts.

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10.

This Court has personal jurisdiction over LTD because LTD has a

continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this judicial district

including by regularly doing and soliciting business and deriving revenue from

goods provided to individuals in this judicial district, including but not limited to,

10

on information and belief, selling infringing cases directly to consumers and/or

11

retailers in this district and selling into the stream of commerce knowing such cases

12

would be sold in California and this district, which acts form a substantial part of

13

the events or omissions giving rise to SKITS claim.

14
15

11.

This Court has personal jurisdiction over ACI because ACI has a

16

continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this judicial district

17

including by regularly doing and soliciting business and deriving revenue from

18

goods provided to individuals in this judicial district, including but not limited to,

19

on information and belief, selling into the stream of commerce knowing such cases

20

would be sold in California and this district, which acts form a substantial part of

21

the events or omissions giving rise to SKITS claim. Moreover, on information and

22

belief, SKITS thereon alleges, that ACI has entered into an agreement with LTD to

23

indemnify LTD for actions related to the products ACI has sold LTD, including

24

products it it knew or should have known would be sold in California and this

25

district.

26
27
28

12.

Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)-(d),

and 28 U.S.C. 1400(b).


-3-

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 5 of 19 Page ID #:245

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

2
3

13.

SKITS, formerly known as Relief Pod International LLC, sells and

markets compartmentalized Tech Cases used to keep items such as cords,

chargers, and other accessories for electronic devices portable and organized. Since

the launch of these cases, including the SKITS Smart Tech Case shown below, in

March 2014, they have enjoyed substantial success and acclaim.

8
9

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

14.

The Smart Tech Case debuted in the widely read SkyMall catalogue

21

and has since been featured in national publications such as USA Today and Travel

22

Weekly, regional news outlets like The Seattle Times and The Dallas Morning

23

News, and almost a dozen other blogs, websites, and other online news outlets in

24

fewer than two years on the market. The Smart Tech Case is also offered by

25

national retail chains like Nordstrom, Best Buy, and Fred Meyer, and through the

26

SKITS website since at least as early as December 2013.

27

///

28

///
-4-

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 6 of 19 Page ID #:246

15.

SKITS has common law rights in the SMART TECH CASE trademark

in connection with organizing cases by virtue of SKITS widespread and

continuous use of the mark.

4
5

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

In light of the innovative design of the Smart Tech Case product, the

United States Patent and Trademark Office duly issued United States Design Patent

No. D739,655 (the 655 patent) on September 29, 2015, entitled CASE. A

copy of the 655 patent is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit A and incorporated

herein by this reference. SKITS is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and

10
SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

16.

interest in the 655 patent.

11
12
13

17.

SKITS has provided the public with constructive notice of its pending

and now issued patent rights pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 287.

14
15

18.

Defendants ACI and LTD are infringing by manufacturing, using,

16

selling, offering for sale, and/or importing into the United States cases that infringe

17

SKITS intellectual property rights, including SKITS rights in the 655 patent and

18

in the SMART TECH CASE trademark.

19
20

19.

LTD sells and offers for sale a Smart Tech Organizer Case that is

21

virtually identical to SKITS Smart Tech Case. SKITS is informed and believes,

22

and based thereon alleges, that LTD purchases the product marketed as Smart

23

Tech Organizer Case from ACI; that ACI imports that product into the United

24

States for sale to LTD and perhaps other US-based customers; and that ACI has

25

agreed to indemnify LTD for any infringement claims brought against ACI with

26

respect to that product.

27

///

28

///
-5-

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 7 of 19 Page ID #:247

1
2

20.

ACI and LTD neither sought nor received permission from SKITS to

use its 655 patent design.

3
4
5

21.

ACI neither sought nor received permission from SKITS to use its

SMART TECH CASE trademark.

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

22.

SKITS is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that LTDs

unauthorized use of the SMART TECH ORGANIZER CASE mark and 655 patent

design is intended to trade upon the goodwill and substantial recognition associated

10

with the Smart Tech Case and SKITS, and to cause mistake or deception as to the

11

source of LTDs cases.

12
13

23.

By virtue of the acts complained of herein, LTD has created a

14

likelihood of injury to SKITS business reputation, caused a strong likelihood of

15

consumer confusion, mistake, and deception as to the source of or origin or

16

relationship of SKITS and LTDs goods, and has otherwise competed unfairly with

17

SKITS by unlawfully trading on and using the SMART TECH CASE mark and

18

655 patent design without SKITS permission.

19
20
21

24.

SKITS is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that ACIs

and LTDs acts complained of herein are willful and deliberate.

22
23
24

25.

ACI and LTD have profited through infringement of SKITS SMART

TECH ORGANIZER CASE mark and 655 patent design.

25
26

26.

ACI and LTDs acts complained of herein have caused SKITS to

27

suffer irreparable injury to its business. SKITS will suffer substantial loss of

28

goodwill and reputation unless and until ACI and LTD are preliminarily and
-6-

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 8 of 19 Page ID #:248

permanently enjoined from their wrongful actions complained of herein.

2
3

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(PATENT INFRINGEMENT)

5
6
7

27.

SKITS repeats and re-alleges the allegations of the foregoing

paragraphs of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

8
9

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10

28.

This is a claim for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271 and

281 against all defendants.

11
12

29.

Defendants, through their agents, employees, and servants, have and

13

continue to knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the 655 patent by

14

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the Smart Tech

15

Organizer Case product that is covered by the claims of the 655 patent.

16

Defendants acts of infringement of the 655 patent were undertaken without

17

permission or license from SKITS. SKITS is informed and believes, and on that

18

basis alleges, that defendants knew, or should have known, of the 655 patent and

19

that its actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the 655 patent.

20
21

30.

As a direct and proximate result of defendants acts of infringement,

22

Defendants have derived and received gains, profits, and advantages in an amount

23

to be determined at trial. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289, SKITS is entitled to

24

Defendants total profits from its infringement.

25
26

31.

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 285, SKITS is entitled to damages

27

for Defendants infringing acts and treble damages together with interest and costs

28

as fixed by this Court, along with reasonable attorney fees.


-7-

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 9 of 19 Page ID #:249

32.

Due to the aforesaid infringing acts, SKITS has suffered great and

irreparable injury, for which SKITS has no adequate remedy at law. Defendants

will continue to infringe the 655 patent to the great and irreparable injury of

SKITS, unless enjoined by this Court.

5
6

SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(INFRINGEMENT OF UNREGISTERED MARK)

8
9

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

33.

SKITS repeats and re-alleges the allegations of the foregoing

paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.


34.

This is a claim for trademark infringement arising under 15 U.S.C.

1125(a).
35.

LTDs use in commerce of the SMART TECH ORGANIZER CASE

mark for organizing cases for earbuds, cords, chargers and more is likely to cause
confusion with SKITS use of the SMART TECH CASE mark for a nearly
identical case for cords and accessories for your electronic devices.
36.

SKITS is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that LTD

20

knew or had reason to know of SKITS ownership and use of the SMART TECH

21

CASE mark and that its use of the mark in connection with organizing cases would

22

infringe SKITS trademark in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15

23

U.S.C. 1125(a).

24
25

37.

SKITS is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that LTD

26

has derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive, gains, profits, and

27

advantages from the use of the SMART TECH CASE mark. By reason of LTDs

28

actions, constituting unauthorized use of the SMART TECH CASE mark, SKITS
-8-

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 10 of 19 Page ID #:250

has been damaged and is entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined

at trial.

3
4

38.

Due to LTDs actions, constituting unauthorized use of the SMART

TECH CASE mark, SKITS has suffered and continues to suffer great and

irreparable injury, for which SKITS has no adequate remedy at law.

7
8

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

39.

As a result of the trademark infringement as described above, SKITS

is entitled to relief, including injunctive relief, recovery of LTDs profits, actual

10

damages, reasonable royalty, enhanced profits, and damages, costs, and reasonable

11

attorney fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1125(a), 1116, and 1117.

12
13

THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

14

(FEDERAL UNFAIR COMPETITION &

15

FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN)

16
17
18

40.

SKITS repeats and re-alleges the allegations of the foregoing

paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.

19
20
21

41.

This is a claim for unfair competition and false designation of origin

arising under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

22
23

42.

Without SKITS consent, LTD has created and will create a false

24

designation of origin by using in commerce the SMART TECH ORGANIZER

25

CASE mark and/or other marks confusingly similar to the SMART TECH CASE

26

mark in connection with the distribution, sale, offering for sale, advertising, and/or

27

promotion of LTDs organizing cases, thereby causing a likelihood of confusion,

28

mistake, or deception as to an affiliation, connection, or association with SKITS or


-9-

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 11 of 19 Page ID #:251

to suggest SKITS as the origin of the goods, or that SKITS has sponsored or

approved LTDs commercial activities.

3
4

43.

SKITS is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that LTD

acted with the intent to unfairly compete against SKITS, to trade upon SKITS

reputation and goodwill by causing confusion and mistake among customers and

the public, and to deceive the public into believing that LTDs organizing case

products are associated with, sponsored by, or approved by SKITS.

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10

44.

SKITS is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that LTD

11

had knowledge of SKITS ownership and prior use of the SMART TECH CASE

12

mark, and without the consent of SKITS, has willfully committed acts of unfair

13

competition and false designation of origin in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

14
15

45.

SKITS is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that LTD

16

has derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive, gains, profits, and

17

advantages from LTDs false designation of origin, false or misleading statements,

18

false or misleading descriptions of fact, or false or misleading representations of

19

fact. By reason of LTDs actions, constituting false designation of origin, false or

20

misleading statements, false or misleading descriptions of fact, or false or

21

misleading representations of fact, SKITS has been damaged and is entitled to

22

monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

23
24

46.

Due to LTDs actions, constituting false designation of origin, false or

25

misleading statements, false or misleading descriptions of fact, or false or

26

misleading representations of fact, SKITS has suffered and continues to suffer great

27

and irreparable injury, for which SKITS has no adequate remedy at law.

28

///
- 10 -

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 12 of 19 Page ID #:252

FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(CALIFORNIA COMMON LAW TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT)

3
4
5

47.

SKITS repeats and re-alleges the allegations of the foregoing

paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.

6
7

48.

common law.

This is a claim for trademark infringement arising under California

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10

49.

LTDs acts complained of herein constitute trademark infringement

11

under California common law. LTDs acts complained of herein are willful and

12

deliberate and committed with knowledge that LTDs unauthorized use of the

13

SMART TECH CASE mark causes a likelihood of confusion.

14
15

50.

SKITS is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that LTD has

16

derived and received and will continue to derive and receive, gains, profits, and

17

advantages from LTDs trademark infringement. By reason of LTDs wrongful

18

acts as alleged in this Complaint, SKITS has been damaged and is entitled to

19

monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

20
21

51.

Due to LTDs trademark infringement, SKITS has suffered and

22

continues to suffer great and irreparable injury, for which SKITS has no adequate

23

remedy at law.

24
25

52.

LTDs willful acts of trademark infringement under California

26

common law constitute fraud, oppression, and malice. Accordingly, SKITS is

27

entitled to exemplary damages.

28

///
- 11 -

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 13 of 19 Page ID #:253

FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(CALIFORNIA UNFAIR COMPETITION)

3
4
5

53.

SKITS repeats and re-alleges the allegations of the foregoing

paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.

6
7

54.

This is a claim for unfair competition arising under California

Business & Professions Code 17200, et seq. and California common law against

defendants LTD and Does 1-10.

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10
11

55.

LTDs acts of trademark infringement and false designation of origin

12

complained of herein are fraudulent, unfair, and unlawful, and constitute unfair

13

competition with SKITS under the common law and statutory laws of the state of

14

California, particularly California Business & Professions Code 17200, et seq.

15
16

56.

SKITS is informed and believes and thereon alleges, that it has

17

standing to assert this claim under California Business & Professions Code

18

17200, et seq. because SKITS monetary and property interests have been

19

damaged by the aforesaid actions of LTD.

20
21

57.

SKITS is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that LTD has

22

derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive gains, profits, and

23

advantages from LTDs unfair competition. By reason of LTDs wrongful acts as

24

alleged in this Complaint, SKITS has been damaged and is entitled to monetary

25

relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

26

///

27

///

28

///
- 12 -

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 14 of 19 Page ID #:254

58.

By its actions, LTD has injured and violated the rights of SKITS and

has irreparably injured SKITS, and such irreparable injury will continue unless

LTD is enjoined by this Court.

4
5

WHEREFORE, SKITS prays for judgment in its favor against Defendants

for the following relief:

7
8

1. That the 655 patent be deemed willfully infringed by defendants;

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10

2. That a preliminary and permanent injunction issue enjoining

11

Defendants, its respective officers, directors, agents, servants,

12

employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or

13

participation with Defendants, from infringing the 655 paten;

14
15

3. That Defendants account for all gains, profits, and advantages derived

16

by their infringement of the 655 patent, and that defendants pay to

17

SKITS all damages suffered by SKITS pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284;

18
19
20

4. That SKITS have and recover defendants total profits under 35 U.S.C.
289 for LTDs infringement of the 655 patent;

21
22

5. That an Order trebling of damages and/or awarding exemplary

23

damages issue because of defendants willful conduct pursuant to

24

35 U.S.C. 284;

25
26

6. That an Order deeming this to be an exceptional case within the

27

meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285 issue, entitling SKITS to an award of its

28

reasonable attorney fees, expenses, and costs in this action;


- 13 -

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 15 of 19 Page ID #:255

7. That the SMART TECH CASE mark be deemed valid and willfully

infringed by LTD in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a), et seq.;

3
4

8. That a preliminary and permanent injunction issue against LTD, its

officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, representatives,

successors, and assigns, and all persons, firms, or corporations in

active concert or participation with LTD, enjoining them from

engaging in the following activities and from assisting or inducing,

directly or indirectly, others to engage in the following activities:

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10
11

a. using to market, advertise, promote, sell, offer for sale, and/or

12

identify as LTDs goods the SMART TECH CASE mark or any

13

mark that is confusingly similar to the SMART TECH CASE

14

mark or is likely to create the erroneous impression that LTDs

15

goods or services originate from SKITS, are endorsed by

16

SKITS, or are connected in any way with SKITS;

17
18

b. manufacturing, distributing, shipping, importing, reproducing,

19

displaying, advertising, marketing, promoting, transferring,

20

selling, and/or offering to sell any case products bearing the

21

SMART TECH CASE mark and/or any confusingly similar

22

marks;

23
24

c. otherwise infringing the SMART TECH CASE mark and/or any

25

of SKITS other trademarks;

26
27
28

d. falsely designating the origin of LTDs goods;


///
- 14 -

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 16 of 19 Page ID #:256

e. unfairly competing with SKITS in any manner; or

2
3

f. causing a likelihood of confusion or injuries to SKITS business

reputation;

5
6

9. That, because of the exceptional nature of this case resulting from

LTDs deliberate infringing actions, this Court award to SKITS all

reasonable attorney fees, costs, and disbursements incurred as a result

of this action, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117;

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10
11

10. That LTD be required to account for any and all profits derived by its

12

acts of trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair

13

competition complained of in this Complaint;

14
15

11. That SKITS be awarded damages for LTDs trademark infringement

16

pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117 in the form of LTDs profits, damages

17

sustained by SKITS and the costs of the action, together with

18

prejudgment and post-judgment interest;

19
20

12. That LTDs acts of trademark infringement, false designation of origin,

21

and unfair competition complained of in this Complaint be deemed

22

willful, and that SKITS be entitled to enhanced damages;

23
24

13. That LTD be adjudged to have willfully and maliciously infringed the

25

SMART TECH CASE mark in violation of SKITS common law rights

26

under California common law;

27
28

///
- 15 -

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 17 of 19 Page ID #:257

1
2

14. That LTD be adjudged to have competed unfairly with SKITS under
the common law of the state of California;

3
4

15. That LTD be adjudged to have competed unfairly with SKITS under

California Business & Professions Code 17200, et seq. and that

LTDs actions in so doing be adjudged willful and done knowingly;

7
8

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

16. That an accounting be ordered to determine LTDs profits resulting


from its infringement, unfair competition, dilution, and false

10

designation of origin, and that SKITS be awarded monetary relief in an

11

amount to be fixed by the Court in its discretion as it finds just as an

12

equitable remedy, including:

13
14

a. all profits received by LTD from sales and revenues of any kind

15

made as a result of its infringing actions, and said amount to be

16

trebled;

17
18

b. all damages sustained by SKITS as a result of LTDs acts of

19

infringement, unfair competition, and false designation of origin,

20

and that such damages be trebled; and

21
22
23

c. punitive damages stemming from LTDs willful, intentional, and


malicious acts;

24
25
26

17. That SKITS recover exemplary damages pursuant to California Civil


Code 3294;

27
28
- 16 -

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 18 of 19 Page ID #:258

18. That SKITS have and recover the costs of this civil action, including

reasonable attorney fees;

19. An award of prejudgment and post-judgment interest and costs of this

action against LTD; and

5
6

20. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.

7
8

Dated:

January 28, 2016

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

By: _/s/ Jeffrey M. Singletary_______


Jeffrey M. Singletary

600 ANTON BLVD, SUITE 1400


COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-7689

SNELL &L.L.P.WILMER

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff SKITS, LLC

12
13
14

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL


Plaintiff SKITS, LLC hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.

15
16

Dated:

January 28, 2016

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

17
18

By: _/s/ Jeffrey M. Singletary_______


Jeffrey M. Singletary

19
20

Attorneys for Plaintiff SKITS, LLC

21
22
23

23287824

24
25
26
27
28
- 17 -

Second Amended Complaint


SACV1501591 JLS (DFMX)

Case 8:15-cv-01591-JLS-DFM Document 35 Filed 01/28/16 Page 19 of 19 Page ID #:259

1
2

SKITS, LLC, etc. vs. LTD Commodities, LLC, et al.


United States District Court, Central District of California
Case No. SACV15-01591 JLS (DFMx)

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on January 28, 2016, I electronically filed the document
described as Second Amended Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief
(Patent and Trademark Infringement; Unfair Competition); Demand for Jury
Trial with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send
notification of such filing to the following:

10
11
LAW OFFICES
600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400
Costa Mesa, California 92626-7689
(714) 427-7000

Snell &L.L.P.
Wilmer

12
13
14
15

David M. Given, Esq.


Phillips, Erlewine, Given & Carlin LLP
39 Mesa Street, Suite 201
The Presidio
San Francisco, CA 94129

Attorneys for Defendant


LTD Commodities LLC
Phone:
(415) 398-0900
Facsimile: (415) 398-0911
Email: dmg@phillaw.com

16
17
18

Dated: January 28, 2016

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

19
20
By: s/Jeffrey M. Singletary
Ketan S. Vakil
Glenn W. Trost
Jeffrey M. Singletary
Attorneys for Plaintiff SKITS, LLC

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
SACV15-01591 JLS (DFMx)
23325434.1