Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
to
be
globally
competitive
individual
for
the
thus,
hinder
themselves
in
future
career
ones
life
in
this
changing
world
entails
the
vehicle for developing students logical thinking and higherorder cognitive skills. It is our way to our dream since it will
make us smarter and have a great advantaged to those who hate
Math. Students should really continue enhancing their Mathematics
skills.
Learning Mathematics is fun and exciting. Instead of mere
memorization
of
formulas
and
procedures
and
general
facts,
2. Is
there
performance
significant
in
solving
difference
complex
on
numbers
the
of
the
level
of
selected
Statement of Hypothesis
1. There
is
no
significant
difference
on
the
level
of
findings
of
this
study
bear
significance
to
the
complex
numbers
in
terms
of
addition,
subtraction,
this
study
is
only
limited
on
answering
Definition of Terms
The following terms was operationally defined for further
understanding of the study.
1. Addition
is
the
process
of
combining
two
or
more
imaginary
number.
3. Competency
Level
it
was
the
researcher
wants
to
is
adding
the
number
to
itself
in
is
an
operation
that
undergoes
to
the
Theoretical Framework
Logic
without
which
any
requires
theoretical
no
specific
framework,
and
thinking
is
positive
research
without
any
uncontrolled
imagination,
reverie.
Based
on
this
Also,
solving
curriculum
skills
should
through
the
foster
the
development
processes
of
inquiry
of
and
future
behavior.
The
future
behavior
may
or
may
not
cognitive
and
associative
learning
play
an
because
these
processes
involve
continuous
learning
teaching
by
organizing
concepts
and
learning
by
Lewins
Theory
of
Learning,
as
cited
by
Ceraspe,
and
life
experiences
(nurture).
The
behavior
of
an
are
influenced
by
psychological
forces
such
as
how
the
education,
especially
his
concept
of
the
zone
of
Piaget
focused
on
how
learners
interact
with
their
their
constructivist
application.
classroom
During
learn
this
concepts
application
while
process,
exploring
students
10
Conceptual Model
On the basis of the forgoing theoretical framework, the
Conceptual Framework is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Hypothesized difference among the variables of the
study.
Level of Performance in Complex Numbers
of the selected dormers of MinSCAT Main in terms of:
Addition,
Subtraction,
Multiplication, and
Division
numbers.
These
are
measured
in
terms
of
addition,
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Related Literature
Dicdican (2007) stressed that pupils performance lies on
the expertise of the teacher, his effectiveness to attain the
objectives of the lesson, willingness to provide varied learning
activities for interactive or cooperative learning and initiative
to ask questions that develop critical thinking skills.
While, according to Zanzali (2006), the levels of content
mastery and the skills necessary to carry out certain standard
algorithms
are
satisfactory.
The
mastery
of
problem
solving
12
data
generated
by
this
research
can
contribute
towards
the
educators
that
students
need
to
acquire
problem
the
interconnectedness
between
mathematics
and
other
did
not
show
the
use
of
problem
solving
strategies
as
13
teachers
practicing
and
the
necessary
changes
mathematics
instruction
at
other
Fisico
in
planning
teacher
and
training
departments.
On
should
the
be
extensively
given
in
hand,
more
(2005)
opportunities
mathematical
and
suggested
to
expose
logical
that
pupils
and
engage
problem
solving
in
held
the
and
process.
Today,
intensified
in
14
mathematics
the
competitions
elementary,
secondary
are
and
tertiary
levels
to
motivate
and
arouse
students
interest,
of
the
equal
sign
was
associated
with
success
on
the
Related Studies
Berguera (2009) in her study entitled Level of Performance
in Solving number and Word Problems in Algebra of Second Year
Students in Selected National High Schools in Naujan South and
East District found out that student respondents from Naujan
South
have
better
performance
than
student
respondents
from
Naujan East in solving number problems while they have shown the
15
in
interpreting
mathematical
problems
to
further
Selected
Public
Intermediate
Schools
in
Bongabong
South
difficulties
by
introducing
varied
activities
and
problem
solving
interesting,
allow
pupils
to
experience
16
three
schools
have
varying
levels
of
performance
in
solving
word
based
on
the
finding
on
the
study
Level
of
it
was
prism
concluded
and
volume
that
of
in
terms
triangular
of
volume
prism,
of
pyramid,
cylinder and sphere, the both School A and B got a low and very
low performance respectively.
Furthermore, in the study conducted by Montana (2011), the
Level of Performance in Signed Numbers, gender, dialect, family
income and organizational involvement do not affect the mastery
and
competency
level
of
the
students.
Also
the
educational
17
would
be
great
help
with
their
studies.
The
study
level
where
males
have
outperformed
the
females.
She
18
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
The descriptivecomparative method of research was employed
in this study to describe and compare the level of performance of
the students in solving complex numbers.
This research design describes systematically, factually,
accurately and objectively a phenomenon. Zulueta (2003) defined
this design as a method which considers two entities without
manipulating
their
values
but
rather
establishing
formal
19
Research Locale
This
study
was
conducted
in
Mindoro
State
College
of
Respondents
Population
Sample
Dormers
680
15
Sampling Technique
A systematic random sampling technique was used to determine
the number of the respondents of the study.
20
Research Instrument
The major instrument of the study used is a set of forty
(40) item test. This set of test was selfstructured and other
was
generated
from
the
lessons
in
complex
numbers.
This
is
scored as 10 points.
Part II contracts with subtracting complex numbers with 10
items scored as 10 points.
Part III deals with multiplying complex numbers with 10
items scored as 10 points.
Part IV contracts with dividing complex numbers with 10
items scored as 10 points.
21
Score
Description
910
Very High
78
High
56
Average
34
Low
1-2
Very Low
researcher
distributed
personally
the
set
of
22
23
2. Mean
Formula:
where:
= mean
= symbol for summation
X = nth individual observation
n = total number of observation
Degree of
Freedom
Sum of
Squares
Mean of
Squares
Between
Groups
Within
Groups
Total
Formula:
24
F-ratio
Critical
Value
Results
25
CHAPTER IV
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
level
of
performance
in
adding
complex
numbers
of
the
dormers.
It can be noted that 10 or 66.67% of the respondents got
scores between 9 to 10. Three or 20% obtained scores between 78.
Only 2 (or 13.33%) scored between 56.
Based
on
the
foregoing
results,
it
implies
that
the
26
Table
1.1
Frequency
and
Percentage
distribution
of
the
Level of
Performance
Frequency
Percentage
Description
910
10
66.67
Very High
78
20
High
56
13.33
Average
34
Low
12
Very Low
Total
15
100
Mean: 8.57
Description: High
27
it
can
be
inferred
that
majority
of
the
respondents got the correct answer since they know the rules
involved in subtracting complex numbers.
Table
1.2
Frequency
and
Percentage
distribution
of
the
Level of
Performance
Frequency
Percentage
Description
910
10
66.67
Very High
78
13.33
High
56
20
Average
34
Low
12
Very Low
Total
15
100
Mean: 8.43
Description: High
28
Frequency
and
percentage
distribution
of
the
level
of
29
Table
1.3
Frequency
and
Percentage
distribution
of
the
Level of
Performance
Frequency
Percentage
Description
910
10
66.67
Very High
78
13.33
High
56
Average
34
Low
12
20
Very Low
Total
15
100
Mean: 7.63
Description: High
Table
1.4
illustrates
the
frequency
and
percentage
30
got scores between 9-10 and also, between 56. Only 1 (or 6.67%)
was scored between 34.
Based on the findings, it entails that the respondents have
a high level of performance in dividing complex numbers as shown
by the computed mean of 7.23.
This can be meant that the most of the respondents managed
to get the correct answers because they were acquainted with the
rules in division of complex numbers.
Table
1.4
Frequency
and
Percentage
distribution
of
the
Level of
Performance
Frequency
Percentage
Description
910
13.33
Very High
78
10
66.67
High
56
13.33
Average
34
6.67
Low
12
Very Low
Total
15
100
Mean: 7.23
Description: High
31
Source of
Variation
Degree of
Freedom
Sum of
Squares
Mean of
Squares
Between
Groups
28.87
9.62
Within
Groups
56
238.7
Total
59
267.57
F-ratio
F
Critical
Value
Results
2.26
2.77
Not
Significant
4.26
32
33
CHAPTER V
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This
chapter
presents
the
summary,
conclusions
and
Summary
8.57.
34
35
Conclusion
The researcher has come up with the following conclusions
based on the findings of the study.
36
Recommendations
Based on the findings and conclusions of the study, the
following are recommended:
37
BIBLIOGRAPHY
38
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. BOOKS
Dayrit, B. and Yap, A. (2002) Modern College Algebra (Revised
Edition 2002) Philippines: REX Book Store, Inc., Sampaloc,
Manila
Partible, Fe G. et. al. (2013) College Algebra (2013 Edition)
Philippines: MUTYA Publishing House, Inc., Malabon City
B. UNUBLISHED THESES
Montaa, M. D. (2011) Level of Performance in Signed Numbers
of the Second Year High School Students in Eastern Mindoro
College
Buergera, L. H. (2009) Level of Performance in Solving Number and
Word Problems in Algebra of Second Year Students in Selected
National High Schools in Naujan South and East Districts
Castillo, A. C. (2009) Level of Performance in Problem Solving in
Mathematics
of
Grade
Six
Pupils
in
Selected
Public
39
40
APPENDICES
41
APPENDIX A
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
42
Name:
Date:
I. Addition
1. (5+11i) + (7+4i) =
6. i + 7i + (4) =
2. 15 + (-2+3i) =
7. 25 + 4i =
3. (2+5i) + (6+7i) =
8. (2+3i) + (16)+7 =
4. (3+2i)+(45i)+(5+8i) =
9. 3 + (72i) =
5. (1511i)+(45i)+2i =
II. Subtraction
1. (1+6i) (8+2i) =
6.
2. (52i) (35i) =
7. 15 (3i21) =
3. (27i) (313i) =
8. 3
4. 4 (i+7) =
9. 25 6i (2i) =
5. 25 i =
43
4 + 7) (2+3i)=
7 4 )=
III. Multiplication
1. (7+2i)(2+7i) =
6. (4+7)(3i) =
2. 2i(5+6i) =
7. (i+7i)(4) =
3. (73i)(4+25) =
8. 3(7+4) =
4. 100 (38i) =
9. (256i)(4+2i) =
5. 6(5+i) =
10. (14+5i)(6+i) =
IV. Division
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
(-4+2i)
25
(
24i)
3i
i
3i
7.
8.
i2 +2i+1
i+1
6.
-2
9.
10.
44
(-36)
2i
(
5
24i
3
i+3) i+1)
i+1
66i
11
APPENDIX B
CURRICULUM VITAE
45
CURRICULUM VITAE
Personal Data
Educational Attainment
Undergraduate Course
Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in Mathematics
Mindoro State College of Agriculture and Technology
Main Campus
Alcate, Victoria, Oriental Mindoro
46
Secondary
Aurelio Arago Memorial National High School
Main Campus
Leido, Victoria, Oriental Mindoro
S.Y. 2012 2013
Salutatorian
Academic Excellence in Mathematics Awardee
Most Outstanding Researcher Awardee
Active Girl Scouts of the Philippines Awardee
Elementary
Simon Gayutin Memorial Elementary School
Malayas, Poblacion III, Victoria, Oriental Mindoro
Salutatorian
47