Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
MISCARRIAGE
THESIS SUMMARY
THE DIPLOMATE OF NATIONAL BOARD
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
1. Name of Specialty
2. Area of interest
3. Title of Thesis
4.
Year of submission
7. Name of Hospital
Ethical Issue:
We have strictly followed PRE-CONCEPTION AND PRE-NATAL DIAGNOSTIC
TECHNIQUES (PROHIBITION OF SEX SELECTION ) ACT,1994 and did not
misuse trans-vaginal ultrasound scan for sex detection by any means.
Methodology:
A thorough history regarding including demographic features, detailed obstetric and
menstrual histories and pregnancy symptoms was taken. All women underwent a
Women with spotting or slight vaginal bleeding did not have significant
correlation with miscarriage(odds ratio of 1.483 and 1.625 respectively and
p=0.4512 and 0.4023 respectively)
Mean gestational sac diameter was significantly smaller in miscarriage(n 1)
group compared to continued pregnancy(n2) group(21.97+9.38mm vs
32.06+10.34mm, p<0.0001).
Gestational sac diameter less than 5th percentile, with other parameters within
5th to 95th percentile, had odds ratio 0.3541 and did not correlate significantly
with miscarriage.
Crown to rump length in miscarriage(n 1) group was significantly smaller than
in continued pregnancy(n2) group (11.18+9.02mm vs 18.67+10.40mm,
p<0.0001).
Crown to rump length less than 5th percentile, with other parameters within 5th
to 95th percentile, had odds of 1.478 for miscarriage (p=0.513). This suggested
that only small CRL less than 5th percentile was not a predictor of miscarriage.
Fetal heart rate was significantly slower in miscarriage group(n1) compared to
continued pregnancy(n2) group(117.68+ 23.96bpm vs 152.52+15.90bpm,
p<0.0001).
Fetal heart rate less than 5th percentile, with other parameters between 5th and
95th percentile, for corresponding gestational age had a sensitivity of 15.71%,
specificity of 98.18%, positive predictive value of 64.71%, negative predictive
value of 84.60% and odds ratio of 10.068 for miscarriage (p<0.001). This
suggested that fetal heart rate less than 5 th percentile, with other parameters
within 5th and 95th percentile, had significant correlation with miscarriage.
Receiver operator characteristic curve showed that FHR of 128bpm was the
optimum cut off for continuation of pregnancy.
The coefficient of determination(R2) was 0.2672.This suggested that there
was 26.72% chance of miscarriage for every 10 bpm decrease in FHR below
130 bpm.
Mean yolk sac diameter was significantly larger in miscarriage(n 1) group as
compared to continued pregnancy(n2) group(4.89+0.97mm vs 4.66+0.76mm,
p=0.031), except at 49 to 55 days and 63 to 69 days of gestational age (p=0.15
and 0.20 respectively).
Yolk sac diameter more than 95th percentile, with other parameters within 5th to
95th percentile, had odds of 0.061 for miscarriage (p<0.7408). Therefore, only
YSD more than 95th percentile, with other parameters within 5th to 95th
percentile, did not have significant correlation with miscarriage.
Gestational sac diameter-CRL difference was significantly smaller in
miscarriage(n1) group
as compared to continued pregnancy(n2)
group(10.89+5.68mm vs 13.85+4.73,p=0.001), but GSD-CRL difference was
not significant at 42 to 49 days and 70 to 76 days of gestation (p=0.1047 and
0.2257).
Prediction sensitivity for miscarriage was 14.29%, 40.00%, and 24.29% for
Gestational sac-CRL difference 5mm, 10mm and 15 mm respectively.
Specificity for prediction of miscarriage (96.67%) & odds ratio(4.883) was
highest for GSD-CRL difference <5mm.
Receiver operator characteristic curve for GSD-CRL difference showed that
GSD-CRL difference of 12mm was the optimum cut off for continuation of
pregnancy.
Evaluation of the combination of two abnormal parameters shows that CRL
less than 5th percentile alongwith FHR less than 5 th percentile, with other
parameters within 5th to 95th percentile, had the highest odds ratio for
miscarriage prediction( odds ratio:66.61). This combination had a sensitivity
of 8.57%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative
predictive value of 83.76 and a relative risk of 6.156 for miscarriage
prediction.
Evaluation of combination of three abnormal parameters shows that
combination of CRL, GSD and FHR less than 5 th percentile, with YSD within
5th to 95th percentile, had the highest odds ratio for miscarriage
prediction( odds ratio:34.2). This triple combination had a sensitivity of
4.28%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative
predictive value of 82.12% and a relative risk 5.92 for miscarriage prediction.
A combination of all four abnormal parameters, i.e.,GSD, FHR, CRL less than
5th percentile and YSD more than 95th percentile, had a sensitivity of 5.92%,
specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive
value of 83.12% and odds ratio of 34.27for prediction of miscarriage. High
specificity of above combination suggests absence of above parameters can
predict continuation of pregnancy.
Multiple regression analysis showed that CRL less than 5th percentile, FHR
less than 5th percentile and FHR less than 130 bpm are most significant factors
which affect continuation of pregnancy.
11. Conclusion:
This prospective study showed that pregnancies with crown to rump length less than
5th percentile, mean gestational sac diameter less than 5 th percentile, fetal heart rate
less than 5th percentile and yolk sac diameter more than 95 th percentile for
corresponding gestational age are at increased risk of miscarriage. Pregnancies with
gestational sac diameter- crown rump length(GSD-CRL) difference less than 5mm
and fetal heart rate less than 130bpm at any gestation were at increased the risk of
miscarriage.
Pregnancy at risk of miscarriage should have appropriate care. Till the date there is no
consensus in the most effective intervention for prevention of miscarriage. At risk
pregnancies identified by early ultrasound may form the basis for further intervention
studies evaluating prevention of pregnancy loss. So, there is a need of a multi-centric
study with larger sample size for confirming these findings.
12. Recommendations: